New Mars Forums

Official discussion forum of The Mars Society and MarsNews.com

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Announcement: As a reader of NewMars forum, we have opportunities for you to assist with technical discussions in several initiatives underway. NewMars needs volunteers with appropriate education, skills, talent, motivation and generosity of spirit as a highly valued member. Write to newmarsmember * gmail.com to tell us about your ability's to help contribute to NewMars and become a registered member.

#1 Re: Not So Free Chat » I'll take malaprops for *5* Bob - Apropos of Nothing continues. . . » 2006-07-24 16:33:44

One eyed hobo says the Falcon I will succeed and all will be surprised after Falcon 9 launches the Bigelow package.

Do not ask for more, lest you tempt the Fates.  lol

Satan (Dnepr) says "No!"

#2 Re: Not So Free Chat » I'll take malaprops for *5* Bob - Apropos of Nothing continues. . . » 2006-07-24 16:31:54

Well, tattooing bar codes on people is generally considered 'oppressive'.

This is all part and parcel of an anonymous society. Personally, I welcome our new silicon overloards.

Implanted wi-fi chipsets are so much more 21st century . . .

#3 Re: Human missions » hot damn! Bigalow is up there! » 2006-07-24 16:30:45

Burt Rutan told ISDC2006 that he did NOT see a solution for cheap soon orbital flight.

As for Bigelow, I betcha he ends up selling habs back to NASA.

#4 Re: Human missions » hot damn! Bigalow is up there! » 2006-07-24 16:29:08

It probably cost billions to develope the next-gen airliner, but your building a thousand of them

Economies of scale are not the answer either, they can only reduce the price so much until the profit margin becomes unsustainably small. Plus, the capital cost of making a massive mega giant rocket factory, fuel plant, and rapid-fire launch pad would be ruinous.

I recall reading somewhere that an RL-10 is no more complex than a gas turbine helicopter engine which cost about $100,000. Maybe the RL-10 is less complex than the gas turbine engine.

An RS-68 is a bigger engine, but how much more?

The difference between gas turbine engines and rocket engines? Assembly lines and demand.

Create demand and prices will fall.

#6 Re: Human missions » Sorry, its the Moon, not Mars » 2006-02-19 23:37:46

Some personal attention mongering trying to explore some near term benefits from space exploration.

Comments?

#7 Re: Human missions » Lunar Space Elevator » 2006-02-19 23:32:56

There are plenty of smaller, manageable bits of impacted asteroids on the Lunar surface; why oh why is it so hard to believe that mining and refining them there is inherintly and overwhelmingly superior to asteroid mining?

Wow! That is pretty much what I just posted here.

I am more sanguine that GCNRevenger about the long term prospects for asteroid mining. That said, mining fragments that have come to a nice stop, 3 days from Earth (on the moon!) seems like a much better place to start.

Okay, maybe we run out eventually. But not within the next few decades and practice on the moon will be invaluable.

#8 Re: Human missions » Jeff Bell hearts Mike Griffin » 2006-02-14 17:56:06

I seem to recall (too lazy to google it up) that Griffin was scathing about STS / ISS before becoming NASA Administrator. His reasons parallel the reasons you often recite.

Griffin by himself cannot "cancel" STS / ISS - its waay above his pay grade. But, if circumstances develop that allow him to make a case to Congress . . .

One can always hope.  wink

#9 Re: Human missions » Jeff Bell hearts Mike Griffin » 2006-02-14 16:59:44

Link

NASA critics like myself are often asked what they would do different if they were in charge. For the first time in many years I can honestly say: I would do nothing different from what the current Administrator is doing.

Wow! Just Wow!

#10 Re: Human missions » What should be the focus of human space society/exploration? » 2006-02-09 23:31:37

GCNRevenger, the Mormons might possibly be a group interested in being that non-profit organization you describe, except they probably haven't thought about it yet.

Otherwise, I cannot say I disagree much at all with your descriptions.

= = =

A MXER tether could allow bulk supplies to be transported at a relatively modest cost multiple over whatever Earth-to-LEO lift costs could be achieved.

#11 Re: Not So Free Chat » I'll take malaprops for *5* Bob - Apropos of Nothing continues. . . » 2006-01-18 22:06:29

William Shatner (Captain Kirk) donated a kidney stone to a charity auction. No joke.

Ain't America grand?

big_smile

#13 Re: Not So Free Chat » Uh.. I thought we were going to Mars within the Decade ? » 2006-01-13 11:28:07

Cobra White is an awesome name for toothpaste.

As RIZ4 now demonstrates, a while back NewMars did have this golden age, an age of spirited intelligent discussion. But clark is right. "It was bound to happen"

= = =

Remember, neo-cons began life as liberals not conservatives. Reading RIZ4 reveals the mechanism of their transformation.

#15 Re: Human missions » Post central for information on CEV IV - Before thread #3 melts down » 2006-01-13 09:20:24

I am not sanguine about recoverable lunar ice.

If its there, great. But its not a sure thing.

#16 Re: Human missions » Post central for information on CEV IV - Before thread #3 melts down » 2006-01-12 22:23:55

A methane RL-10 has already been built, as I recall.

Also, disposable LSAMs need to be temporary otherwise no sustained presence is possible.

At first I was dismayed by the cancellation of plans for a methane ascent engine but then realised (thanks, google!) that steam reformation is a leading method of creating pure hydrogen.  So? Well, store methane and then mix with water at 1100 C and pure H2 and CO2 comes out. The H2 comes from both the water and the methane.

Steam reformation might take less energy than cracking H2O by electrolysis and at least some of the steam production can be done (started?) by passive solar.

= = =

Edit to add: Pratt & Whitney doesn't seem worried that a methane RL-10 is any big deal. Or at least one author at P&W

http://pdf.aiaa.org/preview/CDReadyMJPC … 4_4210.pdf

#17 Re: Meta New Mars » Spammer » 2006-01-09 15:58:32

Just got one.

Deleted a "sex" spam thread, that is.

#18 Re: Meta New Mars » Spammer » 2006-01-09 13:04:20

Mars is a passing fancy for most.

Some outgrow it sooner than others.

When you register, you are in effect declaring your desire to belong (at some level) to the community. A lot of people, probably on a subconsious level, don't want to belong.

Classic persuasion / compliance technique. Get folks to agree to something modest and more significant compliance comes later.

I guess you could say that when you post, you end up trying to find something. You are seeking interaction of some sort. But why?

Cool! Ain't it.

When you read / say those words think about John Travolta in that otherwise bad move - - Broken Arrow. Travolta's partner says

"Whoa! You're crazy"

Yeah, I know. Ain't it cool!"

This is all rather strange when you think about it. People typing on keyboards. Staring at monitors. Interacting with strangers. The association? Some red planet no one has visited. But what do I know. lol

I once listened to an historical anthropologist discuss this very subject. Actually it was about watching television. But the comment applies to web fanatics as  well, IMHO.

He said that watching hours upon hours of TV was indeed weird but then in the 14th century people passed the time picking lice out of each others hair. Maybe its not progress, but maybe its no going backwards either.

#20 Re: Human missions » Nasa Shuttle, ISS Woes & To-Mars » 2006-01-07 09:30:24

GCNRevenger, do you "buy" the t/Space claim of being able to lift 4 astronauts for $20 million?

What about $50 million?

#21 Re: Not So Free Chat » I'll take malaprops for *5* Bob - Apropos of Nothing continues. . . » 2006-01-06 22:59:22

Hi, I'm drunk.

And I don't have a blog -sheesh I just remember: I do, but I forgot where, and it's all about Mars robots etc...-
er. anyways. So I post my teenage-angst here (I'm 36 BTW, so much for teenage angst)

Oh, yeah. Drunk. Wheeeeeeee!

Forgot how it felt (in fact: easily described asmoronical self complacency (is that a word?) ) mixed with ... fits of forgetting what you were about to drivel

Weird... In Belgium it's quite deeply ingrained in our culture, getting drunk... But I must say... People (i mean the regulars) in bars look scary!

Do you want a blog? There are some free ones out there.

Non PC blond joke

#22 Re: Human missions » Nasa Shuttle, ISS Woes & To-Mars » 2006-01-06 22:47:02

5x for wages makes sense.

Proton at $250 million ($50M x5) is about the same a Delta IVH, right? No magic here. Its the same story as paying computer folks in Bangladore $18K to do what a coder in Silicon Valley would charge $64K to do.

What we (America) do about this long term is too large of a question for me to ponder tonight.

#23 Re: Human missions » Nasa Shuttle, ISS Woes & To-Mars » 2006-01-05 16:14:58

NASA does deal for Soyuz

$21.8 million per passenger. Are the Russians

[a] Giving us a good price; or

[b] Charging a fair price; or

[c] Gouging on the actual costs?

I am not looking for the big picture just the small picture. Is $21.8 million a fair price of 1/3 of a Soyuz mission?

= =

This does give t/Space a price target.

#24 Re: Human missions » One man one way suicide mission... » 2006-01-05 15:54:03

If the gold is in relativly pure chunks, it could be.

For rare minerals, it all depends. If the current demand for Platinum and related metals continues to increase, its price will become high enough that harvesting it on the Moon would be competitive, provided we had some form of RLV on both ends of the trip. Platinum group metals (PGMs) on the Moon and perhaps asteroids are likly going to be the first space import.

Why do you need an RLV to bring PGM down. Just dump it in the atmosphere with a rudimentary heat shield and target a remote desert.

#25 Re: Human missions » One man one way suicide mission... » 2006-01-05 15:51:29

No Bill, no...

In any event, Mars has nothing tangible they could possibly offer the Earth save one and only one thing: a wilderness. Thats it. Thats all.

Well, that is my standard 2nd answer to this topic.  :?

Position value. Supplies for explorers going further out from Earth, perhaps.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB