New Mars Forums

Official discussion forum of The Mars Society and MarsNews.com

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Announcement: As a reader of NewMars forum, we have opportunities for you to assist with technical discussions in several initiatives underway. NewMars needs volunteers with appropriate education, skills, talent, motivation and generosity of spirit as a highly valued member. Write to newmarsmember * gmail.com to tell us about your ability's to help contribute to NewMars and become a registered member.

#1 Re: Human missions » Selling out Mars and Science? » 2007-02-20 11:47:56

Wow, I never thought I would ever stoop to the level of bashing in a post. I can't believe that I have actually read such a thread on this forum.

I think I am actually dumber from having read some of MR's gibberish. I cannot actually believe that anyone can truly believe what you have posted. But keep on thinking that everything was all happiness and light before the year 2000. Your paranoid drivel is better suited for a conspiracy theory page than a science site like this. Thanks for completely ruining any shred of credibility you had.

#3 Re: Human missions » Debris shedding on STS-45 » 2006-03-25 08:54:58

So if we assume that the damage was caused by a foam strike (does anyone seriously doubt that was it), then why did NASA management on three occations deny engineers' requests to image Columbia to determine the extent of damage? Didn't someone assume after the launch of STS-107 that the impact was non-critical? I guess I am having problems understanding why this problem was allowed to progress for so long.

I also think that Challenger was a different type of issue. Perhaps if Thiokol had acted on the engineers warnings in late 1985 when they were screaming about the o-ring problem, NASA wouldn't have pushed back when they were told about it at the literal last minute. I can't put the entire blame for this on NASA management, Thiokol had lots to do with Challenger flying that day.

But this foam issue has been around for a while, and seems to have been causing serious damage since at least 1992. I am one who is of the opinion that even if NASA had found out there was a gaping hole in Columbia's left wing, there was nothing they could have done to save the astronauts, so maybe it is a moot point. But this issue should have been addressed looooong ago, and I have trouble when people push back with "NASA never had a serious foam issue before this" mentality. I know of sites where if you posted what I just did, you would be labelled a troll, and a shuttle basher. I would like to see what you folks think about this...

#4 Re: Human missions » Debris shedding on STS-45 » 2006-03-24 19:03:31

After STS-45 landed, it was discovered that Atlantis' right number 10 RCC panel had sustained damage. Something had struck hard enough to nearly punch a hole in the panel. Investigation showed that the damage was caused by a man made object, probably during ascent. The panel had to be scrapped.

The not-quite hole was only approximately 2 sq. in., but seems to me to be a significant impact. I don't know if it was ever conclusively determined to be a foam strike, can anyone shed some light on this?

Were major foam strikes causing near misses in re-entry before the loss of STS-107?

#7 Re: Human missions » Ichabod » 2005-11-18 18:15:20

I would think that they would have to keep a minimum of two of the remaining shuttles operational, if they are going to use them, in case of a Columbia-like accident and a rescue mission must be scrambled...

#8 Re: Planetary transportation » Can anyone recommend the following books... » 2004-07-11 08:35:43

Interesting side note... I read the entire CAIB document, and it has pretty much everything that the shuttle book has in it. Very good read IMO, it is not biased either way.

It looks like even with the suggestions CAIB made, it will be nearly impossible for NASA to implement all of them before they attempt another launch in early 2005.

I am thinking about getting that LOST IN SPACE book, but I want to be sure that it is not too biased against NASA by someone who was burned by them. Anyone have any info?

#9 Re: Intelligent Alien Life » One question, what would it be? - Contact with an ET, what would you ask? » 2004-06-28 16:28:38

is the endpoint of evolution extinction???

It is definition dependent.
Evolution implies the death of the individual and group;
to be replaced by the better adapted.

Evolution allowed the capability of flexible responses.
Most importantly, the ability to try things out in our imaginations.

You're right, I shall restate my question....


Is extinction an inevitibility for all sentient beings???

#10 Re: Not So Free Chat » 102,004 A.D. - where will we be 100,000 years from now? » 2004-06-28 16:24:05

I think it will likely be either #2 or even #5. In all my life's experience, nothing that I have seen gives me any hope that humans have what it takes to survive their animalistic tendancies. I mean, seriously people, we can't get along with each other, because one person's "god" is called something other than someone elses. Not that it is our fault really, if not for the genetic instinct to outcompete and fight with each other, we may have never evolved to this point anyways. The number one question in the universe which I wish to know is whether or not this is the same for all sentient beings, or if the endpoint of evolution is really extinction. Are we too powerful for our own good, ready to erase ourselves for such petty reasons as religion?


Unfortunatly, I have to be the pessimistic one here, and say that we will either wipe ourselves completely out, or a plague wipes out 99.9% of the population, and we have to start over.

#11 Re: Human missions » Can we finish the ISS - using Delta IV Heavy? » 2004-06-28 16:10:28

Just let it burn in the atmosphere. Skylab and MIR told the scientists everything they need to know about long-term human presence in space and zero gravity.

I'm sorry but what the hell is going to come out of ISS that is not already known? How ants multiply in zero gravity?

OKay, thats one choice.  :;):

Yet Bush & O'Keefe seem determined to finish it. So why not figure out the cheapest way to accomplish that task?

Just give the ESA or Russian Space Agency the money that the USA was commited to and let them solve it. You know, buy off your stake in the project.

This way NASA:

1. Can concetrate on what's coming next.
2. Save money by decommisioning the shuttle now.

I was wondering the same thing. Why not let the ESA and the Russians finish the acursed thing? They are already the only ones currently sending modules up anyways. BTW, did they ever find that leak? If so, what was causing it?

I personally would love to see those flying disasters turned into diners like the Buran...

#12 Re: Planetary transportation » Can anyone recommend the following books... » 2004-06-23 19:22:53

I actually read some of the Shuttle book tonight.

It was obviously written by non-technical people, most likely journalists. However, it did give a bit more detailed explaination of things than one would obtain from a news site. From the portions I read, thier position seems to be that while NASA probably should not have dismissed the potential for severe damage resulting from the impact, there was not really much they could have done even had they had a high-res photo of the hole in the left wing.

What could have realistically been done if we had known beyond a shadow of a doubt that Columbia would not survive re-entry? Short of sending up another shuttle as a rescue ship in the days after Columbia launched, probably nothing... sad

#13 Re: Planetary transportation » Can anyone recommend the following books... » 2004-06-23 15:39:01

Greetings everyone,

Has anyone read the following books, and if so, what did you think about them:

1. Lost in Space by Greg Klerx
2. Com Check:The Final Flight of the Shuttle Columbia by Cabbage and Harwood.

Please advise, I need something to read....

#14 Re: Unmanned probes » Cassini-Huygens - Cassini-Huygens Discussion » 2004-06-22 17:30:29

quote]
Wasn't there any better way to approach the planet, than passing through an... asteroid field?!? :rant:   roll  yikes

Someone else will have to confirm this, but I think it is because space craft require less energy overall to launch in the ecliptic plane...

#15 Re: Intelligent Alien Life » One question, what would it be? - Contact with an ET, what would you ask? » 2004-06-22 17:26:43

I would ask...


How do we keep from killing each other? It seems that evolution has left us with so much hatred and fighting in order to survive that we can get away from it. I guess my real question is, is the endpoint of evolution extinction???

#16 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Spaceship 1 - going for it » 2004-06-21 10:56:40

Indeed a historic event!!! Congrats to Rutan and Scaled for a job well done. Now do it a few hundred more times!

#17 Re: Human missions » Might Shuttle C - save Hubble? » 2004-06-16 21:36:17

GCN,

Do you think NASA will allow this to happen? It seems they have pretty much written the Hubble off... sad

#18 Re: Unmanned probes » Cassini-Huygens - Cassini-Huygens Discussion » 2004-06-15 19:19:41

Wow, I am totally blown away by these images.


I like to think about how happy people like Kepler and Huygens would be seeing these...

#19 Re: Human missions » Sex on martian trip (serious) - NASA thinks about libido-lowering » 2004-05-06 19:59:55

Think what would happen to a love triange, compete with jealous rage, 30 million miles from Earth.

#20 Re: Human missions » Hello from a new member » 2004-04-21 17:08:30

Thank you for the warm welcome everyone. I am enjoying reading all of your posts, and am pleased to say that I have learned tons of stuff about this subject in my short time among you. I only hope I can contribute in some small way to the advance of our knowledge on this subject. After all, isn't that the job of science? To stand on the previous person's shoulders, thus increasing our overall knowledge base?

MC

#22 Re: Unmanned probes » Cassini-Huygens - Cassini-Huygens Discussion » 2004-04-19 16:27:12

Indeed those photos will be spectacular, I have been stoked about this mission since I heard about it prior to launch in 1997. And I think it is fitting that they named the probe after one of the most influential and enlightened minds of all time....Constantijin Huygens...

#23 Re: Life on Mars » Life... if there is or was, what was it like? » 2004-04-19 16:12:58

My ideas about this subject are not well defined, meaning I have not thought in great detail about it, however, I would say that it would be entirely possible for microbes to evolve on Mars, but little else.

I can't see how there would be enough time for evolution to progress to the point where sentient life could arise, simply because of the fact that most of the history of life on Earth was dominanted by bacteria.

I am not sure that there was time enough for higher lifeforms to evolve. But the only data we have is from Earth, and I try not to let my Earth-centric bias to influence my thinking. So what happened here may not be true for Mars...

About the images from Cydonia....my understanding on this matter are that MGS took high res images of this area, and the face was shown to clearly be a result of the limitation of the Viking imaging system and the lighting. I will try to find a link to verify this...

#24 Re: Human missions » The First to Mars - Who will it be? » 2004-04-19 16:01:50

*So hard to predict even the near future, given the current chaos.

Unless something REALLY goes drastically wrong, I think the U.S./NASA will because, given we were first on the Moon, I can't believe this nation and NASA will allow someone else the glory of being first on Mars.

And as long-time members know, I'm absolutely in favor of an international mission.  Heck, I just want to SEE humans walking on Mars before I kick the bucket...I don't care *where* they are from.  smile

--Cindy

I totally agree, all I want before I die is to see humans walk on Mars, regardless of where they are from. Secondly, for the question of life on another planet (my money is on Europa, Titan is another interesting local) to be definitively answered.

That's not too much to ask is it?

To answer the original question, I think it will likely be a combination of several groups, NASA, the international community, and the private sector. NASA will certainly not be left out of the deal, besides, they could bankroll much of the cost. I would think that as the first mission to Mars be undertaken in a world setting, with several countries contributing to the cause. The private sector is the unknown, it still remains to be seen what new advances they will contribute. I'm thinking inovative technologies like Dr. Zubrin's ISPP.

#25 Re: Human missions » Hello from a new member » 2004-04-19 11:17:30

Indeed I shall Clark....Looking forward to reading and catching up.... smile

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB