Peter Zeihan again: and also other thinkers:

Void · Yesterday 13:22:10

I am putting this here for future review by me: https://www.bing.com/search?q=Wokeness+ … pc=EDGEXST

Articles by Professor Edward Dutton. One example is: "Wokeness and Intelligence with Edward Dutton
YouTube
Amazing Academics
34.3K views
"

I am not advocating or criticizing what he has said. I don't know that to think yet, but the samples I have of his speaking suggest that I will want to understand what he is claiming.

I was busy with plumbing and could not focus on the video I watched.

Ending Pending

Last edited by Void (Yesterday 13:25:57)

Void · Yesterday 22:11:12

Alright from the last post I have selected this video: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … de3f31dc76 Quote:

Wokeness and Intelligence with Edward Dutton
YouTube
Amazing Academics
34.3K views

I have found a refinement in my thinking that I confirmed in this video, I feel.

Starting at about 21.32 in the video we have a segment that differentiates intelligence emergence in the two genders. I feel that this is very important as they present it but I feel I have things of value to add.

I have held IQ as suspect, but it is a measurement. I have worked in association with Metrology, so I have perhaps a fair feel for how to evaluate measurements. They can be sneaky, difficult to understand under the surface.

I will list the stated items as I thought I heard them.

-Prior to puberty the boys and girls have about the same intelligence.

-Females have earlier puberty and their intelligence tops out at 15 years of age.
-Males have a later puberty, and their intelligence tops out at 21 years of age.

*If so then there is a period of time in the American public school system where girls are more intelligent than the boys.
*I feel that this has been exploited by the formulators of the public school system, to intentionally damage boys psychologically.
*Or it may be that boys need to learn how it is to be the inferior before they mature. (Not sure).

But the public school system was set up to stunt creativity, and to make assembly line type workers, and clerks and bosses to supervise them. The rich would own the supervisors, the supervisors then being above the clerks and the assembly line workers to be at the bottom or not employed in industry.

That is to become not a problem soon I hope as with robots and computers, if humans to exist with children, then the children can be tutored by robots, perhaps like the proposed Optimus Robot of TESLA.

We can get rid of all the damaged people who torment the children in schools.

It is claimed in the video that boys end up about 4 IQ points smarter than the girls once they grow to be men. That incidentally does not happen until about 3 years after the 12th grade.

I think that that only exists because of taking the values from the test at face value. I am not sayng that score has to be corrected but rather that its Apples to Oranges.

The speaker says that the females have a higher capability tilted to Language.
The speaker says that the males have a higher capability tilted to Math and Spatial Relations.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spatial_i … sychology)

In my mind this begins to fit together.

While we let people with verbal skills manipulate society, as we may be lesser in that intelligence, now I see how it may be that the Neanderthals and perhaps Denisovans, receded and the surviving humans resemble early homoserines more.

The Neanderthals and perhaps the Denisovans, were in smaller groups. Often in challenging environments that would not support big groups. The males of the Neanderthals have been speculated to have had a lot of testosterones.

https://www.livescience.com/health/gene … -ancestors
Quote:

Neanderthals were exposed to higher levels of testosterone during development, which is likely to make them more unreconstructed in their behavior. This suggests that Neanderthals were more likely to start fights over mates and hierarchy in the group and more likely to have multiple partners. The study used the ratio of the two finger lengths for a range of ancient hominins, including four Neanderthals and an early modern human from 70,000 years ago. The findings indicate that Neanderthals were more testosterone fuelled than modern men, which could have made them more aggressive and promiscuous.
Live Science
+1

https://www.livescience.com/health/gene … -ancestors.

* Actually I think that the above passage may be false, as the hormone will promote strong bones and muscles. And old men of our age get crabby when their testosterone levels drop. Testosterone makes men friendly. But of course, if they have a masculine body and get angry then they can be a threat. If they are weak and get angry, then they may lack options to fight back.

Now let's have a look at the early Homo Sapiens females. Can you say "HIVE MIND!

In the wrong situation with a collection of females you might just as well jump into a sea full of sharks. Most men don't have much of a chance in that case. So be careful where you leap, stay to your own strengths do not play to theirs.

No, I do not think that a hive mind of females has to be evil, but it can be, just like some men can be a big problem.

So, can you measure the IQ of a hive mind? A hive mind can be of a collection of various people and now even computers.

My impression is that with the exception of when the young females migrate to another tribe, females stay closer to the village. So verbal competition and co-operation will matter there more than out in the hunting areas.

And the males if they go out to kill things, should be less reliant on language, as it does not pay to announce your presence in many cases.
And often unlike a village, things might jump down on you from a tree, or you might seek to hunt animals in trees. So, male thinking may be more 3 dimensional than female thinking I am guessing.

So, I am thinking that the subordination of the Neanderthal and Denisovan genomes to the early Homo Sapiens genome would be largely due to a large female hive mind. The Neanderthal females might not have been as competitive.

As for the dense bones and muscles of the Neanderthal and perhaps the Denisovan, with a bigger population, there might not have been enough food to keep them healthy in times of want.

There could be other factors as well of course.

How to deal with mentally ill dominantly female hive minds? I think we might want to have a look at Tomboys as potential allies.

They like to play with boy toys, and perhaps they could be helpful as they are still females.

I am guessing there is someone at SpaceX who is one. A very valuable one.

And we need to keep the wokeoids from trans gendering them and making the useless.

Ending Pending

I largely criticized the American society, but anther fault seems to exist in the British one. They seem to be infatuated with literally dividing the human race into ruler and servant sub species. This is damaging to the human potential, and should be wacked on the head with a shovel and then buried in the ground.

Ending Pending

Last edited by Void (Yesterday 23:02:30)

Void · Today 08:56:53

So, I will break my own rules, as sometimes is necessary. To speak is to be subject to potential predation.

But I like to examine, diagnose, and solve. This topic of the last post is the equivalent to me of figuring out how to do similar in outer space for a non-human situation. I am not as obsessed with this one as you might think. But this "File" in my mind is open so I choose to try to update it.

If it is true that hive minds are often dominated by certain types of females', and a narrow sliver of the male population, then such a hive mind relies on communication at the speed of conversation or it's equivalent.

For the human race to be competent to survive in its environment, it needs efficiency, and it needs capability. A hive mind can be more efficient and might also have sufficient capabilities.

In terms of the stone age, if you have 10 people with small bodies and extra fat on those bodies, they can survive better than 10 people with lots of muscle and body weight but low-fat levels. That is likely true, when the food supply runs low.

The exception to that is if the 10 stronger people take what food there is. But if that is done, then reproduction is inhibited because you likely killed off many of the female population.

The verbal collective of a hive mind is pitted against the partial autonomy of a collection of men and perhaps tomboys. That is if you excessively bulk up the brain, you can produce autonomous minds, but that comes at the cost of calories. Similarly, a bulking of muscle comes at a cost of calories. The point is, if you can have a collection of autonomous big brained and big muscled people, that can be afforded if the environment they are in offers rewards for those attributes. But if you are in a calorie restricted situation then you have to go to a lower powered hive mind.

Having the two genders (More or less), allows humans to access either of these options when it becomes necessary. Compared to most mammals, the human genders are most differentiated of all that I can think of. (I have also read that that is true).

I have read that all computers are female. Well, I really don't know, here is a response:

The statement that "All computers are said to be female" is a humorous and ironic reference to the historical and cultural perceptions of women in computing. Throughout history, women have played significant roles in the development and operation of computers, often working in roles that were initially feminized or associated with clerical tasks. This has led to a stereotype that computers are female, which has been challenged and corrected over time. The reality is that computers have been used by both men and women, and the gendered history of human computers reflects the diverse contributions of individuals in the field.

I suspect that as robots are created, the result will be more masculine, as to be animated in the material world. Males typically are more animated, as they have more muscle on average. I don't know that that is true, but we may find out.

So, what the computer has done for men is to give them a chance to be more communicative. And the produced network is a hive mind of sorts. And that may work faster than a purely verbal hive mind. Verbal hive minds might be slowed down by interpersonal contests. A computer being a high-speed idiot, (So far), even so a male which is often isolated from the core of verbal hive minds, gains a power he was unlikely to have by using computers.

We will see how gains what when humanoid robots emerge.

What I have at some point read is that in WWII, the Germans ordered that American officers should not be killed but rather be allowed to mislead the troops. It has been said that when the Germans would aim to kill the higher officers, then the Americans could start to improvise. So, if there are lower ranked troops with sufficient intellectual autonomy, the danger was that when the hierarch of the hive mind was killed, the Americans would then improvise something that the Germans would not be familiar with. I have read that some American men have an extra part of the brain that allows that. But they would not be selected to be the officers often as they do not easily comply with strict orders.

It is my notion that the American experience would have promoted the breeding of such men as opportunity and challenge existed here. In Europe, I expect that such men would be culled out for being disobedient.

More Coffee...............

I ran into an interesting video this morning: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8V21dm9Fuwk
Quote:

The Real Reason Beauty Standards Changed — And Why Men Pay the Price
Hannah Spier, MD

I am going to pause to listen to it again....................

I am very pleased that she seeks to understand and that she does have quite a lot of understanding.

Men's sexuality is their own. But the government has been bent to play pimp for those who want to turn it into a sex industry. I suppose that private enterprise often has value but, where it facilitates Royal thinking, and the damaging of the society, it has gone too far.

The women who she mentions only understand reality from their own shallow self-serving desires, which are actually perverted.

Unfortunately, things that are desired are manipulated by the succubus, by soliciting a pimping function from an incubus. It is much like the drug trade.

First you find out what is desirable.
Then you introduce it.
Then you withhold it.
Then you charge for it.
And you want to cripple the individual so as to be better able to exploit them.

We are in this stage where the product offered is not satisfactory, but the product desired is to be withheld.

The purpose is to produce an unsatisfied addiction. Male happiness would be the very last thing they would desire.

I have seen conversation that points to London for the drug trade. Opium Wars, American drug problems expanding in the 60's.
Royal thinking is that it is just fine for cause decay, and to feed off of it. Damage the lesser people and they will be easier to exploit.

You will find, i believe that the purpose of the current campaign against male sexuality, is to link male sexual satisfaction to the extraction of money and power.

I understand that when the government decided to figure out how to regulate this on the internet, they solicited advice from Priests, Feminists, and Pornographers.

Ha Ha, a Priest is the function of a pimp as to say who and how sex may occur. The Feminist has a desire to be satisfied endlessly, and a pornographer is a part of this.

So, instead of natural and voluntary depictions on the internet, those were smothered, and deviant and unhealthy things to be promoted for the extraction of money and power.

At any rate I need to move on to more useful things today. So, my summary is "Hands Off!". It is not yours and should not be yours. Get a job and do some useful work!

Stop assisting an unhealthy association of law enforcement with control of male sexuality to extract money and wealth.

I am as an old man who has little true interest in such things anymore. This was a postmortem of sorts.

I am very uninterested for the most part, but I hate irrational bumbling around while the ship is on fire.

And I am happier for it being able to dissociate myself again from the problem.

Ending Pending

Last edited by Void (Today 10:08:36)

New Mars Forums

Announcement

#301 Yesterday 13:22:10

Re: Peter Zeihan again: and also other thinkers:

#302 Yesterday 22:11:12

Re: Peter Zeihan again: and also other thinkers:

#303 Today 08:56:53

Re: Peter Zeihan again: and also other thinkers:

Board footer