You are not logged in.
Okay, I managed to rebuild the thread again so all the posts should now be back. Clearly it's unstable though, so I've locked it and created a new sequel thread.
Please continue discussion here - I locked the previous thread as it was corrupted.
This thread is corrupted - please continue discussion at 'Who Needs a Space Station 2?'
That article has very little to do with Zubrin - he's only mentioned in a footnote. It appears to be about Richard Hoaglund and the associated 'intelligent life on Mars' stuff. So I'm moving this to the appropriate forum.
Just deleted amadu and salame. Sorry to those who received spam, but I don't like deleting people's accounts until there is some independent confirmation that they are spammers - which this thread provided. Thank you all!
You know, I am a fan of Iain Banks, but that didn't occur to me when I wrote that title. Must have unconsciously remembered it from Inversions or something... :laugh:
King of Mars? King of Mars?! I am no less than Emperor and Lord-Protector of Mars, and its surrounding bodies!
Enough I've posted the appendix to part one of the story, and I may post the beginning of part 2 tomorrow...
Nah, I still have around twelve hours I reckon. It'll be online tomorrow, don't you fret!
Hey, the last two chapters were only posted five days ago - I still have two days left... :;):
I've long thought that the reason NASA does well at robotic missions is because they're far less politicized than human missions, and also inevitably because they are much smaller scale. While missions like Galileo and the Global Surveyor are obviously still worth hundreds of millions at least, they pale into comparison with the manpower and money - and bureaucracy and politics - involved in the Shuttle and the ISS.
At the MDRS we had real problems with helmet condensation. Not much we could do about it really - I suppose some kind of heated visor and air circulation system might work though.
As for itchy noses, we just had to live with it
I'm useless, I know! I have a free day tomorrow so I will definitely put them online - along with another article...
Okay, okay! Sorry again - been quite busy writing an article for somewhere else and designing websites. I'll put two chapters up to make up for it
One post is quite enough for an advert, thank you. I've deleted the other duplicates.
Moved to Life on Mars forum.
D'oh! Sorry, I completely forgot. I'll put the next chapter online this afternoon, and don't hesitate to remind me any other week if I'm late!
While in general I don't like fantasy (i.e. swords, magic, dragons, etc) I am perfectly happy with such weird stuff as magic and telepathy *as long as* they are handled in a consistent and logical manner. Take the example of Babylon 5 - they had telepaths there, but their skills worked in a very circumscribed and organised manner. However, in other fantasy shows you might see a telepathic hero being able to take control of someone else in one episode, but in the next he isn't because of some made-up rule or silly loophole that exists for only that episode.
And this applies for SF as well; I liked Star Trek: TNG, but I didn't like Voyager that much because they seemed to be making and breaking the 'rules' of the fictional universe as they went along.
Moved thread to Intelligent Alien Life forum.
Here's an article on Wired that debunks lifter technology, at least in the 'antigravity' sense.
I'm astounded that in almost 2000 posts, there are only 20 separating Josh from Cindy...
I'm rather skeptical myself, but as Clarke says, the payoff could be enormous. NASA has been wise enough to recognise this and has followed up all the promising leads, with a lack of success so far. Interesting to see that Armstrong is out and about again.
Clark - my mistake, I misunderstood what you meant. While I think the idea of a Million Miles March (as in, getting a million people to march) would be great, I honestly don't think that it could happen in the near future; there just aren't that many people who believe in space exploration that fervently. It's one thing to get people to march for gun rights, abortion or civil rights, but entirely another thing to get them to march for something that will not directly impact them or their health.
But yeah, getting a lot of people for the next Shuttle launch would be great. As would co-ordinating a lot of simultaneous parties for, say, the first of the three Mars landings that'll be happening next year...
Million miles march? Damn, that's a good idea. Wouldn't be too difficult to accomplish if we got a few tens of thousands (preferably a hundred thousand!) people to take part - and after all, we wouldn't expect the target to be reached in just a few days. It'll take time.
The question is ensuring that people actually tell the truth when they say, 'I walked x miles today'...
First of all, I'd like to apologise for the recent downtime on New Mars. The domain name registration for newmars.com expired sometime last week, which I missed, and we've spent a quick last few days adding another three years onto the registration. I'd like to reassure readers and members here that New Mars is not going away any time soon, and neither myself nor the Mars Society have any plans to abandon the website. In fact, now that I've managed to set up a new billing system, downtime should be kept to a very minimum.
Things that you'll be able to look forward to in the near future are the serialization of Robert Stockman's 'Mars Frontier' novel and a series of editorials by myself on the state of Mars exploration.