You are not logged in.
I intend to work with this very soon: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … f1341c34fa Quote:
“New Evidence” That CO2 Doesn’t Cause Global Warming? I Don’t Think So.
YouTube
Sabine Hossenfelder
302K views
I value the presenters offer to explain. It is a modification of the more simple common notion of the CO2 greenhouse effect. But blocked is blocked If all the light of a certain wavelength is blocked by CO2 in the atmosphere, then it does not matter, (Too much), at which altitude the last bit of it is blocked. However, I will give consideration to a companion effect which would be the altitude of condensation of water vapor. It seems logical that if CO2 retains more heat at a higher altitude, then it should raise the altitude at which rain and snow and Hail, will form.
This would then allow more water clouds to pass over mountains to the interior of continents.
But I have another set of interests to look into now and will pause this post for a time....................
In diagnosing competitor or Elite thinking, a problem could exist where climate change politics could be used as a tool in international competition, the horizontal, and Elite competition, the vertical.
For instance, I assume that many of the Elites feel that those who are below them are "Useless Eaters". And envy of those portions of the "West" that prosper, could encourage those who do not so much prosper to use environmentalism as a weapon.
So, those are potential circumstances of possible intentions of some of the people and organizations on this planet.
Then we have the accelerationists: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accelerationism
The attempt to wean the world from fossil fuels, could be a accelerationist scheme. And it would not be entirely immoral. If in fact we found out that the greenhouse effect is not that big a danger, new forms of power have emerged in part from that push and from the passage of time.
Among the power sources we are acquiring or about to acquire are solar, wind, geothermal (deep), and Natural Hydrogen.
It is obvious to me why the Communists and other horizontal competitors would like to deindustrialize America and other industrial nations.
The Western Europeans are a somewhat different case. I think that vertical control comes into play with them.
The line of cities, New York???<Dublin<London<Paris<Rome<Athens<others, is to some extent not really comfortable with a non-colonized USA. We have seen their contempt over the many years towards us. But rather than being clever, I think they sure know how to screw themselves up. But are they trying to get back to the Middle Ages, where the elite rule over a rabble? Is the USA in the way?
We must case a paranoid eye onto the British Elites. I have been told that Hittler, wanted to conquer Central Asia as it could supply him with an unlimited supply of soldiers. Are the western Elites inviting the illegal migrants in for this purpose?
Records say that the British put the Afrikaners into Concentration camps: https://www.up.ac.za/research-matters/n … real-facts
Now then are the Dutch and Scandanavian Royalty in conspiracy with the Elites of Britan?
Some evidence of sympathy of the NAZI in the Elites of the UK in and preceding WWII. (And in the USA also).
Yes, these are dark accusations, but now that I have done it, we can watch to see if further evidence will emerge.
I am not in the mood to have religious zealots be used by west Europeans to destroy the people who want representative governments. I am not in the mood to be subjected to such a genocide.
Anyway, that is the extreme possibility of Climate Politics.
Back then to Climate Science if possible.
Climate Science is measurements and theories, I suspect.
It should be useful, but I do not think that it justifies a static reality.
For instance, the Sahara has apparently repeatedly, naturally drifted from arid to green and back again. Well, that is climate change, and I expect that extinctions have occurred because of it. Also new creatures may have emerged from the stimulation that shifting has done.
So, an environmentalism that desires that we subordinate human emergence to a desire for a static climate, does not get support from me.
I support the improvement of the human race though technological advancement. But we want that to not be such an excessive burden on the world that a collapse of the world will result. The main reason we should not want that is that it might lead to the fall of humans.
The world can live on without us most likely, this is our window in time though. But with an estimate 1/2 billion years of life in the planet it could evolve new plants and animals when the world is done with us or when we are done with the world.
That is not to say that I favor extinctions.
It is very difficult to untangle actual Climate Science from Climate Politics.
So, I have suggested that if the predictions of RethinkX come true, then we can sequester Biochar, and allow the continued use of Coal to make solar panels. I think my plan is rather good. However (th) has given some evidence that high quality solar panels might be made without Coal. I will fetch that reference.
This: https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 15#p233715
And this: https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 20#p233720
Thankyou for that (th), we will probably want it for making panels on other worlds, if possible, and maybe on this world.
I will continue this post later..................Pause.................
Continued in next post....
Where I have spoken of Aspin Trees previously of course other trees such as apple, and other could be included.
Ending Pending
This is interesting: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … &FORM=VIRE Quote:
NASA SHOCKED! China's Electric Method Saves 800kg...ISS Can't Compete!
YouTube
Space Core
1 views
I expect that we will develop similar capabilities down the road.
Ending Pending
Centaur 29P
https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … dcf52e1bfe Quote:
Scientists Discovered the Most Active Comet, and It Breaks All the Rules
YouTube
Astrum
88.1K views
So, this is an object that already resembles a "Solar Moth": https://isaacarthur.net/video/solar-mot … lar-sails/
In 2038 the video says the object could be deflected into the inner solar system by Jupiter.
It would probably be a good thing if it could be tamed, into a "Solar Moth", and have it propelled itself to a useful and not destructive purpose.
I don't know if the gas pockets could be tapped and directed to a thrust method.
The materials of it would be very useful in the inner solar system. But Asteroids like Ceres and 10 Hygea might have equivalent resources.
Ending Pending
You might look at RethinkX and Tony Seba: https://www.youtube.com/@RethinkX
They think that solar power will be good even near the Arctic Circle.
Ending Pending
I would estimate that Solar Panels will max out at about 37% and be part Silicon and part Perovskite. The prices will likely be significantly less than it now is.
For Scotland, I would think that the sensible thing would be to have Ammonia Tankers, that would dock, and on the shore would be a power plant. The Ammonia would be bought from competing producers around the planet.
https://ammoniaenergy.org/topics/direct … fuel-cell/
Quote:
Ammonia fuel cells are emerging as a promising technology for clean energy, utilizing ammonia as a hydrogen source to generate electricity with minimal environmental impact.
What are Ammonia Fuel Cells?
Ammonia fuel cells convert ammonia (NH3) into electricity through electrochemical reactions. They can be categorized into two main types: Direct Ammonia Fuel Cells (DAFCs) and Ammonia Cracking Fuel Cells. In DAFCs, ammonia is directly used as fuel, while in ammonia cracking systems, ammonia is first converted into hydrogen and nitrogen before
Ignoring that there is wind power for Scotland, as you guys just don't accept that it is a good thing, then it would make a great deal of sense in Scotland, to convert the Ammonia to electric power on the shorelines and convey it by electric grid.
The distances are not that large.
I think that a thing that is emerging in my mind is local multiplication of value. The political trends of the 20th century permitted a vengeance against the "Rust Belt", by those who resented, and also a desire to capture it's industrial capacity to relocations to the Sun Belt, and overseas. America's Oil had run out. And it certainly looked like the rust belt was less desirable, and labor with less unionization was available in the Sun Belt/Bible Belt.
I do not hold much of a grudge about all of that, it was more or less a fluctuation in the pattern of reality.
Having a look at a post from elsewhere: https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 54#p233654
https://www.fs.usda.gov/wildflowers/bea … grow.shtml
Image Quote:
A question can be asked about solar power and "Aspin World" in North America. And a comparison could be made to the South West of North America.
The question is, "If Arizona thought Solar power was a good thing, at 19% efficiency a few years back, what about solar power below the Great Lakes, when efficiency becomes 37%. Even in many of those locations, the payback can be real.
But the surrounding assets are often better than for much of Arizona.
South of the Great Lakes was the Heart of the Rust Belt.
Global Solar power shows that the Rust Belt is pretty much similar in latitude to the Iberian Peninsula: https://globalsolaratlas.info/map?c=24. … 9.113286,3
But of course, it has more cloud cover than Spain/Portugal.
Map for USA included here: https://www.nrel.gov/gis/solar-resource-maps
Image Quote:
There are monthly maps in that web site that are quite interesting. April through September look rather good for the Rust Belt.
Robot labor to some significant amount could migrate with the seasons.
In the case of the reclaimed Dairy Farm that I suggested be groomed, in the early season trees could be worked with, and then clean up of left over growth from the fall. Then though summer and into fall "Weed" farming, (Not the wacky kind), could be implemented.
Penty of energy to do pyrolysis with.
So, I am anticipating making this old farmland groomed and a proper place for family people to have children away from the reach of Urban Loony Tunes, who want to exterminate the human race.
A portion of the population might be migratory as well. Sun following. A greater portion than now.
With Starlink and Humanoid Robots, teaching can follow the children, if they migrate. Due to AI and robots we are supposed to have an age of abundance. This would perhaps allow many people to have both summer and winter homes, if those were relatively modest in most cases.
A bulk of people leaving the rust belt in winter, would relieve the stress on water resources for the winter. And moving to more southern states, their water resources could supply a expended population. So, in the summer, the water resources of the southern states would get relief.
Also in the wintertime, in the Southwest, the still abundant solar would allow the creation of water resources from the seas or the air even.
So, for solar, I think it is less necessary to only use it in the Southwest. And the Southwest has a strain on it's water resources already.
The comparison would be Saudi Arabia, and Europe. Yes, Saudi has much better solar, but Europe has natural water in abundance, on average. Saudi have to make their water, using up their solar energy. Europe can use its solar energy for other things.
Ending Pending
By involving the Moon for comparison to the Earth, philosophy and value judgements emerge.
While Nuclear for each could have value, at least for now, for the Moon, Nuclear has to be an import and on from local materials. I do agree that at least for original energy setups on the Moon Nuclear is very desirable.
But we were talking about Silicon purity and the cost and results of various purities.
Blue Origin claims 99.999% or better purity. I looked it up and it seems that current solar requires 99.9999 or better purity. Blue Origin probably said, "Good Enough", there is lots of room on the Moon, and lots of regolith.
Philosophy: I have already stated that I am not anti-coal for making solar panels. First keeping the human race alive and improving technologically is more important than preventing climate change. I believe that means to sequester Carbon into Biochar are going to be practical, however. But I also believe that elevated CO2 levels are valuable to the fertility of the Earth. I think that it is likely that the Earth's CO2 level is saturated. Additional CO2 levels are not likely to increase planet temperatures. It may be that the planet is warming up from Elevated CO2, but the warming is likely a "Lagging" event responding to a previously established saturation of CO2 in the atmosphere.
Value: Looking it up, the payback on solar panels appears to be nice per energy consumed vs. energy return.
My AI assistant on my phone has a few things to say:
The energy payback time (EpBt) for solar panels is the time it takes for a solar photovoltaic (PV) system to generate the same amount of energy that was used to manufacture, install, operate and eventually dispose of it.
*(Note that it is not only about the creation of the solar panels).
Based on recent studies, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL)
reports that the EPBT for modern US utility-scale PV systems to be between 0.5 and 1.2 years. Depending on factors like location and the type of modules used. Arizona vs. Seattle, for instance.
I believe that I read that for home installations 1-3 years may apply.
So, presuming that you are going to run your panels for 25 years, best case at this time suggests at least 25 units of energy produced over 25 years for the 1 unit of energy originally used. (Very sloppy estimate).
But I read that solar panels could still be 60% efficient after 100 years. In many cases I have to ask why the usage would only be 25 years.
My idea has bifacial solar panels mounted on poplar wood structure. (Probably needs treatment and replacement over time).
So, that is perhaps a reduced cost if done with robot labor. (This would be on abandoned dairy farms for instance). Perhaps the wood could be cut in Callibans nonelectric windmill by electric robots.
So, we cannot build more possible coal mine locations. We can make more solar panels. If we eliminate most other coal use to the making of solar panels the 200 years of American coal supply should last much longer than 200 years.
So, then:
1) Energy Return.
2) CO2 Pollution/Fertilization.
3) Payback time for money.
#1, I think the energy return is good. The efficiency is expected to be about 30% by 2030, maybe 37% eventually, using Silicon and Perovskite tandems. (So, energy return will perhaps be 50% better than is now true).
#2, We would not be burning coal in power plants, but just to make solar panels. Is CO2 poison or plenty? (I expect it will be easy to sequester the amount of CO2 that making solar panels will create, using a biochar method).
#3, Prices are dropping all the time still.
Quote:
The payback time for solar panels typically ranges from six to ten years, depending on various factors such as system size, location, and available incentives. (Money Payback).
Ending Pending
This is a continuation of the previous post #241. The previous post included information on how to create low efficiency
solar panels.
But an evaluation in the following video, shows that heat engines are not a better deal at all. An evaluation of what energy you get out for the energy you put in. (This applies to solar heat engines, not nuclear heat engines). But we do not know where we could get materials on the Moon to make nuclear heat engines, at least not the nuclear fuel.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HUSa5Y5 … ROFUTURISM Quote:
Stirling Engines vs Solar Cells (+Transmission Lines)
ANTHROFUTURISM
30.8K subscribers33K views 8 months ago
Ending Pending
Building on the Moon is addressed in these videos: https://www.youtube.com/@Anthrofuturism
This particular video, addresses making solar panel power on the Moon. I think that in some ways this is more professional than many that have been done: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-1Dbqv … ROFUTURISM Quote:
Alex Ignatiev: Lunar Resources, Solar Cell Manufacturing, Electrolysis Refining, ISRU & NASA
ANTHROFUTURISM
30.8K subscribers8.7K views 1 month ago
Some points are that a 10% efficiency solar panel would be rather good for the methods available on the Moon.
I suppose a competition might be a heat engine. But for the Moon materials for a heat engine such as fluids might be expensive. I suppose CO2 might be best and maybe water.
It is a good video though, I feel. Alex Ignatiev seems to be very genuine.
Ending Pending
Per the Moon, https://www.youtube.com/@Anthrofuturism , has a lot of articles that may interest you Calliban.
I think that they use Calcium Oxide as the bath, but maybe not.
The British created Metalysis which uses CO2, the Europeans then modified it to not need Carbon, and I am not sure if Blue Origin uses a derivative of it or not. They don't say.
Perhaps more later.
Ending Pending
In the previous post I established that I think we can cope with the future without resort to things we do not have or cour not have.
But here seems to be a path to make solar panels without Carbon usage: https://www.blueorigin.com/news/blue-al … nar-future Quote:
News
|
Feb 10, 2023
Blue Alchemist Technology Powers Our Lunar Future
Quote:
Our process purifies silicon to more than 99.999%. This level of purity is required to make efficient solar cells. While typical silicon purification methods on Earth use large amounts of toxic and explosive chemicals, our process uses just sunlight and the silicon from our reactor.
This offers hope.
As I recall the efficiency of the produced panels will not be very good, perhaps because regolith simulant may not provide special materials that we have on Earth. However, also this may have sacrificed efficiency to provide endurance of the Lunar environment. I am not sure.
Some claims of highly efficient cells on the Moon exist on the internet, but they may require imports of materials to make Perovskite.
Anyway, a Carbon Free method may be possible, it seems.
However, in the previous post I have indicated that we can tolerate using Coal to make Solar Panels.
Ending Pending
I would like to post on this. You guys have some good and critical information, but I am somewhat optimistic. Solar Panels will likely become about 50% more efficient within 10 years, I suspect.
There seem to be 3 main concerns about the solar panel industry. (1) China dominates it. (2) They burn Coal. (3) They reportedly use abused labor.
Expanded robotic labor could address #1, and #3. As for burning coal, I am not sure we should care that much, if it give us a 1/25 or better return of power. (This presumes that it takes 1 year, (In the future), to payoff the energy to create the solar panel and that the solar panel lasts 25 years).
So, we can have a Carbon loop. If RethinkX/Tony Seba are correct that Precision Fermentation will replace dairy cows, then that land will perhaps go feral. I have contemplated having it be groomed instead of going feral: https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 50#p233650
In using "Superpower" to process organic matter to create Biochar, vast stretches of land can be rendered semi-wild but productive to produce both electric power and to bury Carbon into the soils of those lands.
Also, if it does turn out that vast amounts of Natural Hydrogen are to be found, enough for a century at least, then we have breathing space.
Biochar might eventually replace coal, but for now it is likely easier to simply use coal and draw CO2 out of the atmosphere using photosynthesis.
Also Elon Musk does not feel that global warming is likely to kill the planet or the human race. I agree.
Also, I regard elevated CO2 as a nutrient now more than before and a net benefit so far. There is some reason to believe that the CO2 level is saturated and has been for some time. I think kdb512 has previously agreed on that.
If Tony Seba is correct and much of the Dairy Cows go away then the Eco-Karens (Cows), can stop worrying about cow flatulence.
I think we may be in a good spot.
Ending Pending
Its Good.
That is useful information Calliban. It is a hard nut to crack, I have been thinking about it off and on for a long time.
A best guess on possibility is a tank of liquid air with perhaps 18% Oxygen, and then if you could cause that to burn with a fuel, such as Methane. But there would be thermal problems possible and poisoning from CO and CO2 would be major concerns.
A 4% CO2 is considered to be immediately lethal. But maybe a lesser exposure could be a preference to dying in a fire. If humans are not involved, then it would not be a big concern.
I am thinking of Stairwells in tall buildings and perhaps for homes some chance of suppressing a fire. But as you have mentioned the nature of the structure will make results variable or not possible.
For the stairwell, I am thinking of something like a jet engine running on the depleted air, using Methane fuel. But if you could use Hydrogen, that would be much better as to eliminate the Carbon compounds.
For Mars, I am imagining plastic envelops to contain somewhat depleted air inside of ice tunnels and vaults. It should be possible to make plastics largely from water from ice and from CO2 in the atmosphere.
I am thinking of maybe 16% Oxygen, and then humans will need to have a additional source of Oxygen perhaps from an Oxygen Concentrator. I hope that vast volumes of such tunnels and vaults could be created, but I do not want a runaway fire possibility.
As I understand it 16% is temporarily survivable. But humans more often would be in other chambers with greater amounts of Oxygen. Robots should do just fine in 16% Oxygen.
Ending Pending
At the gym, another piece of this occurred to me.
If you understand what "Superpower" is per RethinkX and Tony Seba: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … ORM=VAMGZC
It should be possible to heat bricks very hot with Superpower and to use that brick oven to conduct pyrolysis.
In the winter, you would have much less "Superpower", you would perhaps do more pyrolysis in the spring/summer/fall than winter.
It might however be possible to use the same oven as a storage of heat for houses when heat is needed more in the winter.
Some simple non-electric examples:
https://biochar-international.org/about … hnologies/
Image Quote:
Image Quote:
Image Quote:
http://www.eagri.org/eagri50/AENG352/lec10.pdf
Quote:
Lecture- 10
Principles of Pyrolysis
https://kindle-tech.com/faqs/what-is-th … is-heating
Quote:
Author avatar
Tech Team · Kintek SolutionUpdated 6 months ago
What is the temperature range for pyrolysis heating? Optimize Your Process for Maximum Efficiency
The temperature of pyrolysis heating varies significantly depending on the type of pyrolysis process, the materials being pyrolyzed, and the desired end products. Generally, pyrolysis temperatures range from 200°C to 1200°C. For example, slow pyrolysis of biomass typically occurs at lower temperatures (200–300°C), while high-temperature pyrolysis for producing pyrocarbon or syn-gas can reach 800–1200°C. Medium-temperature pyrolysis, often used for waste materials, operates between 600–700°C. The specific temperature range is determined by the feedstock, reactor design, and the intended outputs, such as pyrolysis oil, carbon black, or gaseous products.
So, some of this is probably in reach.
It might be possible to run an internal combustion engine off of the produced gasses in some cases to run an electric generator, but pollution is a potential but not huge problem.
As for the Biochar produced, it could be spread into soil as like they apparently did in the Amazon, or I think, hydraulically injected as a slurry deep into soil. Or you could use existing bogs, or even create bogs to store the materials, so long as you have a trusted source of water to keep that bob wet.
Ending Pending
You know that I have the greatest of respect for you Dr. Johnson. And I agree that if it is on Utube, on average, it is at least half under suspicion. I believe you that it might make sense to get these resources from the canal/vendors.
But the BE4 is Methane fuel. BE7, I think is Hydrogen.
I don't expect anyone to be perfect, especially not me.
I think we all appreciate your contributions here, sir.
Ending Pending.
A possible fire fighting method I have tried to arrive at would be to push Oxygen depleted air into a building to suppress the fire.
That would not be easy, though, as CO is a poison so using combustion to reduce O2 might be best done by burning Hydrogen. But Hydrogen is hard to handle and the "Burned Air" would be heated a bit, unless you could cool it with a water stream.
Ending Pending
Further thoughts on the prior post, "Wick Cooling".
A combination of external and internal "Wick Cooling" might be useful.
It is possibly in the nature of wick cooling that hot spots will draw more coolant fluid to themselves, so that if some failure occurs in the external heat shield, the internal wick shield might cover the problem well enough to allow the ship to survive.
We also could consider a "Squirt" gun in open spaces such as the Oxygen or Methane tanks, a robot that might squirt a coolant at a Infared visible hot spot. Mayb CO2 would work, maybe Nitrogen. Of course, you would not want to damage things with thermal shock either.
Ending Pending
I have added "Aspin Farms" to the title, as I anticipate that it could be an example of what to do with marginal farmland that Tony Seba says is likely to come into disuse. Tony Seba is associated with RethinkX.
RethinkX: https://www.bing.com/search?q=RethinkX& … pc=EDGEXST
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspen_parkland
Image Quote:
Image Quote: There is a tiny amount of it in N.W. Minnesota, I believe.
Where do Aspin grow in N. America? https://www.fs.usda.gov/wildflowers/bea … grow.shtml
Image Quote:
I am sure that there are more southern deciduous trees that could be grown further south. But I am thinking about converting farmland that may be abandoned to become feral, to be groomed instead to resemble Aspin Parklands.
Part of my logic is that you would have robotic groomers. Probably electrically powered, and you would grow Aspens and weed Medows, or if you like artificial prairie.
These lands are likely to have snow on the ground in part of winters, at least.
This could accommodate solar power, much of it being bifacial solar panels. In the summer the Aspens may shade solar to some extent. In the winter they will shade solar to a lesser extent. The snow on the ground will also reflect more sunlight onto the solar in the winter as well.
So, for solar in these higher latitudes this might make a bit of sense.
Mostly the land would not be ploughed, planted or have chemicals dumped onto it.
But some wood, and some organic matter, leaves, and weeds, could be harvested to conduct enclosed pyrolysis on to produce hydrocarbons and also Biochar from pyrolysis.
The Biochar could be incorporated into the soils with firebreaks so that if a patch burned, it could be controlled. I am actually wondering about deep injection of a biochar slurry where sandy or clay soils were available.
Should it be desired, using Aspin Parkland to try to cool off the Earth might be helpful both for Carbon removal from the atmosphere, and for changing the albedo, particularly in wintertime to reflect more sunlight into space, to some degree regulating albedo.
I also see this "Aspin Parkland" as being suitable for habitation in some places, due to Starlink and the existence of solar energy.
This to combat the urban monoculture which is said to be anti-human and to lead to population collapses.
An opinion: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … &FORM=VIRE
I say that these tools may exist, to try to use, if it turns out that RethinkX is correct and also that the Greenhouse effect is a serious issue going forward in time.
Ending Pending
Bifacial Vertical Solar Panels: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bifacial_solar_cells
Image Quote:
Ending Pending
An EV owner might also get financial incentive to slave the battery pack in their car to allow it use in stabilizing the grid.
Ending Pending
Thinking about post #1 a bit more, perhaps some homes might get a better rate if they could convert over to DC power for internal use in the house. If a Utility had a battery near or at their house, then it could regulate how power from that battery might enter the AC lines. A homeowner could mostly use DC inside their home perhaps. And DC from solar power installations could be sold back to the Utility as DC power.
I am hearing that some appliances such as refrigerators may become battery powered in the future, so perhaps this direction can be considered.
Ending Pending
There has been some chatter about lack of copper/conductor materials due to greater electrification of societies.
I think that to some extent this is already contemplated. For instance, Electric Cars might be used to store energy when plugged in. So, not only would a electric car extract energy from the grid, but at times it might distribute it back to the grid.
Homes and other buildings do not draw constant power though their concoctions to the grids. With increased distributed solar, this is going to become even more true.
So, could a utility put batteries at private locations, to utilize the excess capacity of the power lines? Sodium and Aluminum Batteries may work well for this, and would represent a reduced fire risk.
If the utility had data control of these devices, they could control if the batteries were charging or discharging into the main grid. So, to the limits of safety, the power lines could be kept working at near the capacity limits where possible.
Individual buildings would have their own solar systems or not, their own battery systems or not.
When some type of storm or other such disruption would happen, then individual homes might have a period of time when they could draw off of the utility's battery, even if it had been disconnected by problems with the grid.
I do understand that the downside of this would be line losses from sending electricity to a building and then back out of it. But if copper is to be so much in shortage, then this might reduce the amount of additional copper that would be needed in the future.
Most homes may or may not have roof-top solar installations, but in the future, we are hearing about notions of windows that are solar panels, or even paint that could be solar panels. So, continuous or normal draws though the power lines for these homes or buildings will not be as they are now, and an excess capacity to move electric power to storage though existing grid lines, may open up, to move that power to and from batteries that may be on private property but belong to a utility.
And as it is now, especially with solar the largest draw to a home would be in the early evening, and perhaps not so much otherwise.
Something to think about.
Ending Pending
I suppose that if you had a Rogue Mars, you might not need Plate Tectonics to access geothermal power: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZcHCAF5 … =SpaceSnap
Quote:
Mars Volcanoes Are More Dangerous Than We Thought!
SpaceSnap
14 subscribers
Ending Pending
Just a notion. It might use too much coolant though:
Maybe could be used for some things.
Ending Pending
An interesting story: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … 2807039880 Quote:
Elon Musk REVEALS: Ship 37’s Fuel Crisis Was PLANNED to Rule Space!
YouTube
SpaceX Report
Well!!!!!!!!!!!
Ending Pending