You are not logged in.
first of all, getting back to the first point...china is capitalist. the economy is almost a free market, now. only in the past 2 or 3 years has this been true. the old hard-liners are dying, and there is a real belief among analysts that china will move towards democracy.
i would be very surprised to see a Red Mars, pardon the pun.
they should have put congressional terms limits when the put presidential term limits. but congress isnt about to limit its own power ???
i dont think the article said, but since its non-weapons, i assume uranium
the oil was part of the treaty.
after the treaty, we made an unofficial promise to build two nuclear reactors, the kinds you cant make weapons from, i suppose. they want them, and they got pissed when we actually held them to their legal word.
now, you could always get a second hard drive, and pick which OS to boot. but people arent that smart.
no, youve got it backwards. the treaty never stipulated that we had to build the reactors. and not getting the reactors justifying building nuclear weapons is just stupid. where the connection between a and b is, i dont know.
any way you want to view it, the koreans are trying to bully us into new terms by building nukes. its a devious strategy, but we cant let it work. at least we got russian approval before breaking the abm treaty.
apparently north korea is using our failure to comply with a promise to build two nuclear reactors as a justification for their recent activity. i can see why theyd be angry, but nuclear weapons are not justified by a lack of power plants.
in any case, from my understanding, the korean reactor is a breeder reactor. this shows the risks these reactors carry, but they are still potentially extremely beneficial, with proper safeguards. it also seems suspiciously like a russian construction: the labels are all in korean and russian
using current technology, i doubt that. the space elevator would be more likely to cause a moon base than vice versa.
Semi OT: todays New York Times had an article about a huge study that says that "high stakes" tests (ex. a high school graduation test), are bad for the educational process...they cause the curriculum to degenerate and focus on that test, and academic achievement goes down.
hmmm, sounds a bit like what i said heheh.
if we used a space station as a counterweight, wouldnt it be kind of really easy to expand the station as much as we wanted? it would be like a permanent life line, if anything needed to be fixed, we could send up help right away.
and is there any maximum size to the counterweight?
a government in a capatilist system can bring the hammer down on monopolies or corrupt industries. look at microsoft. i think bill gates was just a genius businessman. others thought he was bad, so he was punished.
our government seems to have a cycle, more regulation, less, more, less, that continues depending on the situation.
i think if we get that elevator up, orbital development will be enough to spur space development. we dont need the moon to get to mars.
just read a new york times article. a nuclear expert says a decade of dormancy means that the reactor might not even work anymore. its a five megawatt reactor. and they claim to be using it for power purposes...riiight.
well see how it plays out. hopefully the reactor just doesnt work. save us a lot of trouble. but the government just gave lockheed a huge (multibillion dollar) extension on the f-16. you wont see that in the paper. thats one of those pre-war signs ive seen before...
yes, but actually, it would be somewhat inefficient to have them go short distances. like a plane, they have to accelerate and slow down, both of which take time, since they go hundreds of mph. so, there application would be in medium to long distance travel.
if we sign a treaty that keeps inspectors there, which he is allowing now, we can keep an eye on whether or not he is building nuclear weapons. that was half of my point.
no, you said you have nothing against mexicans
all mexicans are hispanics, not all hispanics are mexicans.
these people are making a living for themselves. and they are a tremendous part of our economy. the money they make filters back into our economy in stores, and many of them bring their families over. when they become naturalized, they pay taxes. their children grow up to be productive american citizens. they do jobs americans would never do, and by taking these jobs, other citizens can pursue more lucrative careers.
what i would do, as a show of good faith, is to establish friendlier terms with sadam. lift sanctions. show him that we're willing to work with him. any little thing we do to show our good intentions will bring a huge payoff.
sign a treaty with sadam that allows us to keep inspectors there, gives iraq aid money, and allows us to make sure the money goes to the people. then we cant be accused of starving people. there is no need for a war.
in south korea, offer a public apology for the actions of our soldiers. i believe the problem was that our soldiers killed a girl running across a street. discharge the responsible officers, and apologize. do anything to make amends. pay for a funeral. do community service.
when we have a few well-established martian towns and industrial operations, i think a maglev transport network would be a great idea. little fuel is needed to run the trains, they are extremely fast, and they can carry plenty of people and goods. they can run constantly. while air transport will be important, i think ground transport is also vital. some goods might be too large to carry in rocketplanes.
the cost of establishing a maglev system on mars would be much smaller than on earth. why? because here, we would have to build around pre-existing towns, cities, etc, and we would have to rip up old lines. there, we just have to build over open ground between towns. we could build our towns around the system.
I have plenty of faith in our government. i dont have faith in its ability to make real progress where it counts. congress has become too concerned over what will get them re-elected. this is why nasa gets very little funding, and trent lott got his state contracts to build naval vessels the navy said it will never use. anything they can use in their next campaign.
the problem is that north korea broke a treaty that they signed. Now, they play the all-powerful, "Evil American" card. It is a perfect way to rally support for an illegal action. What's in question isnt a nuclear power plant-it's their failure to follow a reasonable, valid treaty. They arent doing that, so they are getting spiteful. It's not our fault they violated the treaty.
And for the record, when we broke the ABM treaty, we got Russia's, somewhat reluctant, approval first. North Korea did no such thing.
i think the american military is around 7 years ahead of the "latest" american military technology. what you see is the declassified stuff...thats stuff theyve had for a long while.
We currently are researching and developing medications that can stimulate the production of proteins and cells of any type. If a trip in microgravity causes bone degeneration, there is no reason why we can't create a drug that stimulates bone growth, or calcium production. At the very least, we could develop drugs that supply the necessary nutrients directly to the body (bioengineered insulin and other proteins already exist).
This being the case, the issue of microgravity is really being overdone, to put it lightly. This is really the primary reason, besides cost, that people have said that Mars travel can't be done. That logic is ridiculous.
just take the US. obviously capitalism works here. the highest GDP, GNP, and the greatest world power status dont really lie.
i havent seen anyone building underground bunkers in case of nuclear war.
and people in israel fear going onto buses. thats the result of common strikes. no, common strikes dont reduce your fear, they just desensitize you to the reality of it. you accept the strikes as part of life. you give in, which is what the terrorists want.
er, where? where the system is abused by a corrupt government?
and where is socialism used, besides that little island of Cuba? socialism didnt work. germany was socialist, and there was a hell of a lot of starving there. Same for the soviet union. so what is the benefit of socialism?
socialism has a place in certain applications (i.e. healthcare), but as an economic system, it sucks.
isnt there any way to harness the waste heat? no way at all?