You are not logged in.
Everyone , every good citizen should have the right to vote
so this talk about only certain should go ahead is just silly
still it amazes me how the governator's can get into office
http://www.sacredcowburgers.com/parodie … rnator.jpg
http://www.johnshakespeare.com.au/caric … /arnie.gif
Wonder who'll be next to get elected ? Mickey mouse, Bart Simpson ?
Seems there could be a bit of trouble in the Bush camp, 380 tonnes of explosives missing in Iraq. Does that make you feel safe, Mr. and Mrs. America?IAEA Director-General Mohamed ElBaradei passed on the letter from Iraqi authorities informing the agency of the theft to the Security Council.
He told the council that the high explosives had been lost after 9 April 2003, during "the theft and looting of governmental installations". The IAEA was told about the loss over two weeks ago, Dr ElBaradei said, but he had hoped to give US forces and Iraqi officials time to try to recover the missing explosives before the matter became public knowledge. After the fall of Baghdad, american troops were assigned to guard the oil ministry, while they ingored the mass lootings that took place, not only in the museums and office buildings, but also in the nuclear research facilities- the very facilities that might have contained information about those oh-so-dangerous "weapons of mass destruction" that Bush had his underwear in a bunch about. One pound of this explosive, in an improvised explosive device, has the power to take out an american amrmoured veichle . Recall any Previous attacks of this sort but using weaker explosive have resulted in about a 50/50 fatality/casualty ratio, when successfull. Let's just say that, if the entire stolen cache were to be turned into IEDs, and only 35% were successful in taking out such a target...
well no need to do the math because the number is just massive ( if you're still curious the if these explosives are held by Terrorists then you could be looking at 532 thousand fatalities).Half a kilogram (1lb) of a explosive related to HMX was enough to bring down Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, in 1988, killing 170 people.
The amounts apparently taken from the al-Qaqaa site could have filled three trucks. US weapons experts are concerned the explosives could be used in bomb attacks against US and Iraqi forces in the run-up to Iraq's planned elections in January.
It is not the first warning the IAEA has given about potentially dangerous material going missing.
:down:
Check this guy he's got a wonderful image of the Lunar Eclipse
Bush will trash Kerry in the debates
So, who won ?
small video clip with highlights from the Bush Vs Kerry debate
You know I still admire much about what the USA stood for, and America has often been a place of greatness. However it also gets quiet messed up at times, and there are certain issues.
Its a shame how all the mud slinging goes on, and how people are trying to politically screw each other over. Now for the Kerry issue.
and what he ( Kerry ) said:
"I would like to talk to you a little bit about what the result is of the feelings these men carry with them after coming back from Vietnam. The country doesn't know it yet, but it has created a monster, a monster in the form of millions of men who have been taught to deal and to trade in violence, and who are given the chance to die for the biggest nothing in history; men who have returned with a sense of anger and a sense of betrayal which no one has yet grasped."
How the moron rightwingnutbags, like our Earthfirst twist it:
"Kerry said that Vietnam vets were ' Barbarian baby killers'!"
Let's get back to the Sinclair media issue and TV channels to rubbish Kerry as ' Traitor ' on eve of US election
TV channels to rubbish Kerry as ' Traitor ' on eve of US election
you can find reports at
thedailystar , morons dot org, and voice of America news have it
The Sinclair Broadcast Group is going to force other sations to show an anti-Kerry video calling the democrats Traitors .
Sinclair has ordered its 62 stations to air the program just a few days before the real election day - on November 2.
"No one has ever lost votes by lying to the American people!" In the ultimate Orwellian convolution, the draft dodger (Bush) has become the war hero, and the genuine war hero (Kerry) has become a war criminal! In the recently concluded Republican Convention at New York, the name of Osama Bin Laden, the real criminal, and Al Qaeda, the real criminal den were not mentioned even once. The message of the carefully choreographed convention was simple: Osama and Al Qaeda had morphed into a new enemy: Democratic Presidential candidate John Kerry! Bush and the Republicans' rallying cry was: forget Osama and Al Qaeda, America must destroy this new, even more sinister enemy, John Kerry.
The Sinclair Group has made large donations to President Bush's re-election campaign. The company made news in April when it ordered seven stations not to air another program that featured a roll call of U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq.
While Mr. Bush has spent $200 billion so far on the war in Iraq, average Americans are hurting. Bush's ill-advised tax cut for the wealthy has resulted in a record $422 billion budget deficit this year alone. Unemployment remains high, close to 6 per cent. Mr. Bush will go down in history as the first President since Herbert Hoover during the depression of the 1920s to record a net loss of jobs during his 4 years in office. Between January 2001 and November 2004, America will have lost at least one million jobs. The stock market is sputtering; the NASDAQ is down 60 per cent from its all time high. More Americans are without health insurance than ever. Mr. Bush has appointed the most rightwing judges to the nation's courts. His environmental record is atrocious. Last week, to please the gun lobby he let the ban on assault weapon lapse after ten years, infuriating the law enforcement agencies who will be the prime target of these weapons. Bush has no exit strategy for Iraq.
Federal election law prohibits corporations and labor unions from engaging in or funding "electioneering communication" within 60 days of an election.
Sinclair's markets clearly reach more than 50,000 people. They clearly intend to broadcast an anti-Kerry smear-umentary within very few days of the election. Few reasonable people would call "Stolen Honor" news any more than they'd call "Fahrenheit 9/11" news.
John Kerry's rise in the polls always seems to be quickly followed by the raising of the terror threat level by Attorney General Ashcroft and Homeland Security Secretary Ridge. This way Americans are scared into rallying around the commander-in-chief. Last weak, Vice President Cheney told Americans that if Kerry is elected, America will be hit again by terrorist. The press reported it as "Vote for Bush or Die!"
Sinclair Broadcasting Group, which owns the largest chain of TV stations in the United States, has told its stations to broadcast a documentary accusing Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry and democrats of betraying the United Sates of America.
I am not a lawyer, and if you think Federal election law is confusing, you're not alone. Having said that, it certainly appears to me that Sinclair Broadcasting intends to violate Federal election law, specifically the prohibition of corporate election campaigning within 60 days of an election
John Kerry has forgotten how vicious the Bushes can be.
In 2000, when the junior Bush's campaign was faltering and Senator John McCain's surging, the Bushies circulated lies that MCCain was a traitor against the United Sates, and that his adopted daughter from Bangladesh, Brigitte, is actually his daughter with a black prostitute!
CBS News apologized under pressure last month, saying it could not verify the authenticity of documents it used in a segment dealing with President Bush's National Guard service record.
The media and the entertainment industry have frequently been in the spotlight in the run-up to this year's presidential election.
Sinclair in April told its ABC-affiliated stations not to show a "Nightline" show on which the names of U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq were read.
News reports say The Sinclair Group has made large donations to President Bush's re-election campaign. The company made news in April when it ordered seven stations not to air another program that featured a roll call of U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq. Sinclair TV Group, who tried to block news on the Enron corruption , the stations that made little mention of Cheney's robbery
can you say Halliburton ?
and whose executives have given tens of thousands of dollars to President George W Bush's
They have revealed plans to show the smear film calling hima a traitor and attacking Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry just days before US the election
The United States founding fathers would be turning in their graves !!
:rant:
http://www.sbgi.net/index.shtml]http:// … ndex.shtml
:angry:
TV channels to rubbish Kerry as ' Traitor ' on eve of US election
:angry:
Check out this propaganda
Looks like the Bush camp will get some help in their smear campaign
QUOTE
One of America's biggest television companies has announced plans to broadcast a film days before the presidential election that portrays the Democratic candidate John Kerry as betraying his fellow soldiers in Vietnam
If it's true, that's the last nail in the coffin of America's media concentration. Fox news which has now become a tool of GW / Rumsfield thought to give as little coverage as possible to the stolen votes by Bush, fails to mention the terrible GW job on the economy or will give minimum reports on the torture in Abu Graib
Fox news a station that would have made Hitler proud. A newstation created by the radical Neo-Con Roger Ailes - media adviser to Bush. Maybe some might consider it low to argue/compare anyone to Nazis, but keep in mind that in June,2004, the Repubs (on GeorgeWBush.com) posted the faces(pics) of Kerry's democratic party: Kerry, Gore, Gephardt, and ....Hitler.
The conservative Sinclair Broadcast Group will reportedly present the film as news on the 62 local channels it owns nationwide.
The film will replace normal primetime programmes supplied by the national networks and reach up to a quarter of the electorate, many in critical battleground states, about a week before the election on November 2. Democratic senators have also said they will protest to the federal communications commission (FCC). The FCC is chaired by Michael Powell, the son of the secretary of state, Colin Powell !!!!
:rant:
The Bush plans for Mars, a real class act !!
http://www.globenet.free-online.co.uk/i … _small.jpg
http://cagle.slate.msn.com/news/BushLig … aughon.gif
George Bush tryin' a Fool us with a nice Martain stunt
http://politicalhumor.about.com/library … olbush.mov
The IMF warned that increased federal debt from the deficits would make funding social security and healthcare more difficult.Robert Rubin, former treasury secretary under Bill Clinton, along with other senior economists, last week published a report warning that the Bush administration's record deficits will have "severe adverse consequences" for all Americans and is unsustainable. Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW) is sounded a note of caution
"Cost estimates for the new programs range from $550 billion to $1 trillion," said CAGW President Tom Schatz. "Until the federal government brings the record deficit back down to Earth, it should not launch expensive new space programs of questionable scientific value."
The Congressional Budget Office estimated Monday that the federal budget deficit would swell to $477 billion this year, a record in terms of the sheer number of dollars involved
Bush hasn't offered any more specifics for cutting the deficit, and -- according to some analysts -- what plans he has proposed seem more likely to grow the deficit, including:
What's more, spending on Social Security and Medicare -- "mandatory" budget expenditures -- will skyrocket by the end of the decade, as millions of baby boomers begin to retire, de Rugy and other analysts say.
"This is like running up a credit card debt and asking our kids to pay for it in the future -- it's fiscal child abuse," de Rugy said.
NASA gets cut down on Apollo 11 Anniversary
I wonder why[
:angry:
Starttext from Clipboard Row 0 in Step: 36
He will be sadly missed, may he rest in peace
I recall him being a bit anti-Bush in his past few talks
GW
he had some right-wing ideas on stopping stem cell research, Chris Reeeve was trying to raise money for medical research for SCI and other nerve tissue related injuries and diseases. He lobbies the government for SCI research funding and funding for for stem cell research. The actor, who found film fame as "Superman," told Britain's Guardian newspaper the Bush Administration had caved in on the issue of embryonic stem cell research .
Reeve, paralyzed seven years ago when he was thrown from his horse, said he was "angry, and disappointed," that Bush had hampered developments in stem cell research which might have led to human trials aimed at rebuilding the nervous systems of quadriplegics.
"I think we could have been much further along with scientific research than we actually are," he said.
"There are religious groups -- the Jehovah's Witness, I believe -- who think it's a sin to have a blood transfusion. Well, what if the president for some reason decided to listen to them, instead of to the Pope, which is the group he really listens to in making his decisions about embryonic stem cell research ? Reeve was saying.
From what I have read about him, Christopher Reeve was politically active in high school, protesting the Vietnam War then went to Cornell and became involved in environmental issues as well. As an adult, he has championed First Amendment issues and funding for the arts, and is active in Amnesty International, Save the Children, The National Resources Defense Council, The Lindbergh Foundation and others
Embryonic stem cell researchers hope these microscopic blobs might be coaxed to grow into healthy aortas for people with heart disease, and into pristine spinal chords for the actor Christopher Reeves, whose backbone was shattered in accident, leaving him paralyzed.
The president had rejected the views of a large majority in the Senate, his health senator (Bill Frist of Tennessee), Secretary of Health and Human Services Tommy Thompson, former First Lady Nancy Reagan and actor Christopher Reeves. They all favored limited research on cells
Now how will George Bush answer the next star people and others who are in danger or need help like Mary Tyler Moore, or Michael J. Fox
On his deathbed, former President Ronald Reagan, a victim of Alzheimer’s disease, makes the strongest possible case for why government should not interfere with stem cell research.
It is quiet possible that
Neither Bush or Kerry will have anything great to do for NASA and getting people in Space
However the Bush ideas seem much worse, so Kerry wins out becuase the Bush plans are bad or just won't happen and Kerry would be better for space
http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/viewt … hp?t=15147
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ … ...RL=http
Some papers were just plain mean. Britain's Guardian documented Mars' irrelevance to everyone but red rock aficionados and then turned its biting sarcasm directly at Bush: "Take-off is planned for the year 2020, or later if they let Dubya do the final countdown from 10 to lift-off."
http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/edit/ar … 2003091871
So Kerry wins
Vote for the guy who has trouble with the basics of the English language. I've often listened to Chinese kids that have much better English than GW maybe he just gets jittery when speaking in public ?
done funnier blunders with his words in the past
old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once....
...he forgets the ' old saying ' and Bush comes up with a new eminem / snoop-dog impression to hide the verbal stupidity.
http://politicalhumor.about.com/library … olbush.mov
its going to be a close election between Bush and Kerry
Not a bad show
http://www.bushspeaks.com/img/Bush_Chen … n_Logo.gif
http://www.mediaresearch.org/stillshots … 012604.jpg
http://www.tylwythteg.com/enemies/Chene … heney1.jpg
http://www.csufresno.edu/Collegian/arch … ...ton.jpg
bechetel , parsons I must say it was a laugh listening to Dick trying to defend all the lost dollars in Iraq, and trying to defend those big companies which suck the life out of American tax payers
Is it any wonder the American economy is sinking in debt and from corporate madness
and the Chinese, the EU, S.Korean and other economies are growing nicely while the American surplus sinks into Trillions of debt
Oh yeah that's not just a few Billion of overspending it's TRILLIONS :down:
People may have been correct when they said the President candidate Kerry lacked charm,
but Cheney always reminds me of the beedy Mr Burns from the Simpsons
I don't mean to mock or laugh at the Americna president, but I was wondering if he has a mental problem such as difficulty with speaking or a slight reading disability ? I recall about 3 years ago some American doctor said something like after asking a third expert, who said, "Bush is probably dyslexic" or some problem like this. There are just so many gaffes, bungles and stutters when he talks or is he just nervous about talking in public ?
???
Over a year ago he caused a little madness in the Asian economies and US stock market when George W Bush made a statement about "devaluation" in Japan , he was meant to address the problem of "deflation", but because he brought up this other sudden-subject it caused cash to fall and stocks to drop, the next day of course Bush aides hastened to clear up the confusion, saying the president - in Japan as part of an Asian tour - had "misspoken
does Bush have some kind of slight disability ?
:hm:
It seemed to me that Bush got hammered during the debate. Or perhaps nailed, it's diffuclt to tell, but bottom line is it was a pretty dumb move for him to agree to do the debates in the first place. Kerry's job is to get up in front of the senate and debate; Bush just really doesn't stand much of a chance against him because he doesn't deal with this sort of thing regularly. Does anyone know how many times Bush said "How can you call this the wrong war, wrong place, righ- wrong time?" I counted five.
Throughout the debate Kerry made better points, defended himself well, and kept his composure. Several times Bush was caught off gaurd and was left pounding his podium stammering to come up with a decent response.
Kerry started off dull and without any material
while Bush started off fine, talking about getting Saddam out, all the usual catch phrases 'fighting the war on terror and making Iraq free'. But later into the debate Kerry had shaken him with some points about the lies on war, cost of instability in the middle East , over-spending and body-count in Iraq. After this Bush started to stumble , err and stutter.
I also counted Bush using the term 'you can't send mexed missages ' about twice
yes that's not a type-error it was Bumbles Bush saying 'mexed missages' and fighting vociferously !
now we have some more Bushisms to add to the list
He's done funnier blunders with his words in the past
old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once....
...he forgets the ' old saying ' and Bush comes up with a new eminem / snoop-dog impression to hide the verbal stupidity.
http://politicalhumor.about.com/library … olbush.mov
It was a big political mistake for him to have a live debate because his English is worse than mine.
No I don't think its Atlantis but Irish have some very old stuff
building about 5,000 or 6,000 years old ? Much older than pyramids, built many things by older communities and groups of people back then, and had much undersatnding of math, building and stars
http://www.photosite.de/ireland/Photos/ … s/17-3.png
http://evamd.gmxhome.de/Urlaub/Irland/4 … ..._26.jpg
The the way stones and rocks are in the place, on the shortest day of the year the light from our Sun goes down a massive chamber and lights up some tomb where some important person was buried
I have always heard Altantis is under the sea, so it would not be Ireland
Some will look down on Bush now...don't mention the French
kind of a shame having a president who speaks worse English than me.
good debate, lots happening
Kerry doesn't look solid enough with no real charm, points out many probelms but doesn't give answers, Kerry with no strong personality
Bush avoids questions and humms and errs like a school-kid, he was a bit shaken by some facts, Bush will use his old plan with no real outlook or new plan for dealing with the growing problems
http://www.jibjab.com/]http://www.jibjab.com/
' This Land '
The only way to look at an election that's going to get messy
London-based artist formerly known as Cat Stevens, was denied admission to the United States on national security grounds
He was met by federal agents and detained for interrogation, was denied entry to Israel also because of certain ideas Israel has about him.
http://www.thefreeman.com/opinion/index … ...d=22132
http://www.pressaction.com/news/weblog/ … o09232004/
Is he a terrorist ?
People have lost faith in the Bush plan, many say it was just a stunt and since he announced his idea there are a number of high people who have seen some problems with it plus many American magazines have made a joke of Plan-Bush to Mars
http://cagle.slate.msn.com/news/BushLig … aughon.gif
http://www.fakewiz.com/fakes/20040217_b … h_mars.jpg
'How do I get back' the cartoon looks like a silly joke but is it?
Bush had outlined a pay-as-you-go approach, NASA's portion of the $2.2 trillion federal budget will have to be $16.2 billion in 2005, up from $15.5 billion in 2004. However with the shakey economy, the cost of security and bombings in Iraq , congress cutting NASA on the Apollo aniversary and rising debt it looks like the Bush plan might have been a stunt. The Major components of the president's plan, must be approved by Congress for NASA to anywhere near Mars again, and after the Genesis crash there are some calling for more safety checks and better management from NASA.
Going to Mars is a wonderful idea but is plan-Bush the right way to do it?
Little by little it goes with very little thrust
, but it will have done a whole lot after a while, testing new designs and help us move forward with new engines. It's a nice new way to send stuff to space, plus we must now think about long term missions because sending stuff up takes time so having a fuel that will last the distance is good also
I recall a nice story by the ESA webpage, Smart one was looking back at Earth and it took a photo of the middle East. Pity there's so much trouble there now, but it looks so wonderful from outer space
http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/SMART-1/SEM … QWD_0.html
here's the link
Smart-one was a very good idea
That works out to about 100 flights a year, which means two flights a week. With one vehichle? That might be optimistic.
Yeah, I think I am being very optimistic. If such a vehicle could be developed for 10 billion it probably would already be developed. But then again technology is always progressing, and as time passes it should become easier to develop such a vehicle and hopefully the market for deuterium will grow. Maybe we should require the vehicle be able to haul at least 5 tones of deuterium to LEO. I know it will be easier to get to Low Martian orbit, but I want to leave some margins.
we have to learn how to make our stuff built in space long lasting, make them profitbale and self sustaining otherwise people will say we shouldn't be spending money on going to Mars
... worries about how quickly they might de-adapt. After all, a manoeuvre such as aerobraking into martian orbit may require an A-1-normal vestibular reflex condition and hand-eye coordination.
De- adapting could be a problem... But not for aerobreaking, etc. As much as we like the mental picture of a 'hot' space-pilot, doing incredible manoevring, it all should be totally automatic. Of course if things go totally SNAFU, there would be some manuall-override capabilities, but i don't think humans are capable to do all that high-precision stuff. The real steerin must be done with computers, some button-pushing by astronauts should be good to give them at least the morale-boosting impression they make a difference, but that'd be merely symbolical.
De-adapting on the surface, OTOH... imagine that all of a sudden you have to de-adapt AND put on your heavy suit, climb off a rickety ladder, and negociate a rock strewn plain... That could be one small stumble for a man, a giant circus for mankind... :laugh:
I feel there is still much work to be done, the direct route could be a way which causes many risks
Casualty Rate
Lack of Public Support
Damage to the Local Environment
Drain on the Economy
I would also say
Failure to win the global-political and propaganda, for example it's no good saying We are here to Bring Freedom to Iraq people
meanwhile Rumsfield's guys are doing crimes and torture in Abu-Graib :down:
this is another battle lost, the propaganda war going down hill :rant:
NASA has way more things done in the past. Chinese still have much work to do, before they can push out their new designs but there might be a plan to do something big by the Olympics 08' such as an updated Shenzhou as Aldrin thought
going in orbit but not landing
or maybe sending robotics to explore the Moon
They still have lots of work to do before they can make it happen but the China economy and aeropsace industry is growing fast
US House of Representatives panel has voted to cut the money given to fund space, environment and science programmes for next year. Just $372m was provided out of the $910m Mr Bush wanted for initial preparations for manned missions to the Moon and Mars.
That was bad, well maybe all these problems can be fixed soon
Time for another Irangate and iraq-gate to bring back to profit to the ranch, even if it means the cost of more American lives ?
I hear they are bringing back the draft anyway