New Mars Forums

Sbird and others
I swear I will never attack idea of Roman rocky road on Mars.
Life on Mars is holly and nobody can't say anything against it.

Life live on Mars!!!
Life live on Mars for ever!!!

PB:Sbird citat "unusually high methane levels in the Martian atmosphere"
whats normal level?
:bars:

Nice link.
I am concern that we will not hear anything from cassini because ESA has made cassini. in a light what happened to Beagle I doubt. But maybe some miracle or something.

Hej Luca!
I choosed my nickname on this forum because I wanted to provoke people like you and others that flooding NASA with Mars 'discoveries'. And you get catched on mine nick.

I can just say  I didn't saw any evidence of primitive life on Mars so far and to put it mildly to start to speak of Roman like civilization on Mars is to early.

I will follow your advice to become a god scientist so I have allready bought a book with heading "Romans roads for dummies" so I am prepered in a case that opportunity sends picture of Julius Caesar.

Hej Luca
Post you made citat off is at same level as your post about ancient roman road on Mars and wheel. Do you mean roman road and wheels on side of crater is scientific approach to Mars debate?
:band:

Forget about ancient traces of water on Mars. There's a little white bunny up there.

And stone tools.

And dinosaur fossils.

Plants, art, even letters of the alphabet.
[http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepubli … ars08.html]Read more

yes pixel size at that resolution is ca. 0.03mm but one pixel is not enough because one pixel can't contain much information.
you need min. 3 or 4 pixel for se something and som optimum 6-7 pixel. That means  we can se object of minimum size somewhere between 0,1-0,2 mm.Therefore  we can't se microfosile at this resolution but only macrofosile.

35 1.We can say some places on the earth are dry but we can’t say that on Mars.
2.If Mars once had lakes today must be mud at that place.
3.On the earth light and dark sand can be dry or wet, but on Mars light sand is always dry and dark sand is always wet.
4.We even have trouble identifying fossils on Earth that are older than 3 billion years old despite sophisticated lab techniques but on Mars we only need couple of pictures.

:hm:

1. If something has spheric shape on Earth that can be product of biology but if something has spheric shape on Mars that can only be product of biology.
2. If sand on top has different color then sand on bottom that sand must be wet.
3.If sand is pres together appear to be lighter that sand must contain salt. We know that salt has only white color just look our salt in kitchen.
4.If something  on Mars looks different than stones or sand in our backyard or local beach that must be product of biology.
:band:

Bonneville panorama [http://images.spaceref.com/news/2004/03 … le.lrg.jpg]Bonneville

Citat fra space.com
NASA:
Don't expect any evidence of life to be detected by the current rovers, however. Scientists agree that if life ever existed on Mars, it did not get beyond simple, microbial stages. Remains of such life on Earth are typically detected not as conventional fossils but via mineral or chemical signatures only in very well preserved rock.

"Unless we find a dinosaur bed, we're not going to be able to [find signs of past life] in situ very easily," Craddock said. Instead, samples would need to be returned to an Earth lab for more study, he said.

:bars2:

Nothing! but ERRORIST saw yolk, blood vessels, cells etc.

Hello cassioli !
I think only person in this forum who can explain "Strange mars "artifacts"" is ERRORIST. You and ERRORIST should create homepage with this heading:
"We (cassioli and ERRORIST) can see things on Mars which never exist on Mars":p
or " Mars for dummies"  :band:
I want give some tribute to your homepage see at bottom center of this image I can see "big fat worm"