Announcement

Announcement: This forum is accepting new registrations via email. Please see Recruiting Topic for additional information. Write newmarsmember[at_symbol]gmail.com.
  1. Index
  2. » Search
  3. » Posts by Void

#1 Re: Business Proposals » Data Centers (Including Off World) » Today 13:15:08

I recently viewed a video that indicated that recovery of the 2nd Stage (Starship Itself) is not necessary for data centers to be economic assets in orbit.

This leads me to speculate, as I often do that the used 2nd Stage in orbit could be put to other uses, such as scrap metal or parts for energy systems such as concentrating mirrors or radiators.

Eliminating the need to land an expendable (Not Really) Starship would relieve congestion on landing locations, and would allow the dry mass of such a Starship to be minimized. 

This then allows for more payload to orbit.

All of these factors may be important.

It is needed that some Starship 2nd stages can be recovered to Earth from orbit, but it is not required that all Starships 2nd Stages would be returned to Earth, at all.

Ending Pending smile

#2 Re: Terraformation » AquaWorlds (Water Holding and Water Transporting Methods) » Today 09:49:06

This may seem a strange place to put this video from Isaac Arthur, but my ideas are that Deimos/Phobos/Mars >>> Asteroids can be modified to Earth  >>> Moon >>> Deimos/Phobos/Mars >>> Asteroids.

Although with effort Hydrogen could be lifted from Mars and combined with Oxygen from Demos/Phobos, it is in the asteroid belts that we would obtain giant drinks of water that this topic is compatable with.

But if you can gain propellants from Deimos/Phobos, then it may be true that you could get similar types from our Moon.  Particularly if the Moon has a mass driver or other lift device such as rotavators or space elevator.

https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … &FORM=VIRE
Quote:

Isaac Arthur, The Great Lunar Boom - Building a Civilization on the Moon

Pause..............

The concept of a Mass Driver has the largest currency at this time as it is a stated objective of people like Elon Muak at this time.
Historically the idea is to send loads to a "L" location.  To do that you need a method to shave off residual speed.  In the era of "O'Neill", the idea was a rotating catcher where the bags of regolith would impact and the ore be collected.

In the newer visions the words "Satellites Launched from a Mass Driver", suggest the current intentions.  In that case, then you need some on-board propulsion and navigation included into the devices to be launched.

I am currently infatuated with Table Salt on the Moon.  It appears that Sodium and Chlorine are both going to be available on the Moon, but at first Table Salts delivered might be a relatively easy starter path.

Query: "Sodium on the Moon?"
Quote:

Like

Dislike
Yes — the Moon contains sodium, both locked in its surface minerals and present as free atoms in its extremely thin exosphere. Global measurements from Chandrayaan‑2 show an average of about 1.33wt% sodium in the lunar surface, and Earth‑based observations detect roughly 67 sodium atoms per cubic centimeter in the exosphere.
Where the Moon’s Sodium Is Found
1. In Lunar Rocks and Soil
Sodium is a moderately volatile element hosted mainly in plagioclase feldspar and pyroxene minerals.
Returned Apollo, Luna, and Chang’e samples show 0.3–0.72wt% sodium in lunar soils.
NASA
NASA
Chandrayaan‑2’s X‑ray spectrometer (CLASS) produced the first global sodium map, finding a global average of 1.33±0.03wt%, higher than earlier sample-based estimates.
NASA
NASA
2. In the Lunar Exosphere
The Moon has a very thin “surface boundary exosphere.”
Sodium was first detected from Earth in 1988 as faint glowing emissions above the lunar limb.
Typical sodium density is about 67 atoms/cm³, roughly four times more abundant than potassium.
scienceinsights.org
scienceinsights.org
Sodium atoms come from:
Solar radiation releasing loosely bound atoms from the surface
Meteoroid impacts
Sputtering processes
A long‑lived adsorbed reservoir on the surface that replenishes the exosphere
NASA
NASA
+1
Why Sodium Matters
Sodium helps scientists trace the volatile history of the Moon.
Its distribution reveals differences between highlands and mare regions.
Variations in exospheric sodium help study meteoroid streams, solar wind interactions, and surface composition.
Science | AAAS
Science | AAAS
The presence of sodium in both the lunar regolith and exosphere is now well established through sample analysis, remote sensing, and orbital missions.

Query: "Is there Chlorine on the Moon?"
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-42224-8
Quote:

The apatite grain in Dhofar 458 has an average δ37Cl value of +76‰, indicative of an extremely heavy Cl reservoir in the Moon. Volatile loss associated with the Moon-forming Giant Impact and the formation of lunar magma ocean could account for the large Cl isotopic fractionation of the Moon.

So, of the two, I suspect that the Sodium is the one to seek on the Moon first, as for the process I am going to suggest, Chlorine may be reused many time, but Sodium be used perhaps once.

But mining and transportation and processing of raw ores is a set of skills that should be developed over a period of time.  To begin with I suggest plastic bags filled with Table Salt be dropped from landing spacecraft just prior to the landing.

Query: "What happens if you expose Iron Oxide to Chlorine?  Is Oxygen produced?"
Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
Reaction of Iron Oxide with Chlorine
When iron(II) oxide (FeO) is exposed to chlorine gas (Cl₂), a redox reaction occurs in which chlorine oxidizes the iron and itself is reduced to chloride ions. The balanced equation is:

2 FeO + 3 Cl₂ → 2 FeCl₃ + O₂ Chemical Portal.

What happens
Iron oxidation: Iron in FeO is in the +2 oxidation state and is oxidized to +3 in FeCl₃.

Chlorine reduction: Chlorine gas (Cl₂) is reduced to Cl⁻ in FeCl₃.

Oxygen release: One molecule of oxygen gas (O₂) is produced for every two molecules of FeO reacted Chemical Portal.
Conditions
This reaction typically requires heat to proceed efficiently, as chlorine is not a strong enough oxidizer at room temperature to fully oxidize FeO to FeCl₃ without thermal energy scienceinsights.org+1.

The reaction is a single replacement (or redox) reaction, where chlorine displaces oxygen from iron oxide.
Key points
Oxygen is produced — yes, O₂ is a product of the reaction.

The product FeCl₃ is iron(III) chloride, a black crystalline solid that turns reddish-brown in the presence of moisture scienceinsights.org.

This is analogous to how chlorine reacts with other metal oxides, displacing oxygen and forming metal chlorides.

Summary: Exposing iron oxide to chlorine gas under heat produces iron(III) chloride and oxygen gas, with chlorine acting as the oxidizing agent.

The process may be corrosive, particularly against Iron products, as I understand it.

Query: "FeCl₃?"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron(III)_chloride
Quote:

Melting point    307.6 °C (585.7 °F; 580.8 K) (anhydrous)
37 °C (99 °F; 310 K) (hexahydrate)[1]
Boiling point   
316 °C (601 °F; 589 K) (anhydrous, decomposes)[1]
280 °C (536 °F; 553 K) (hexahydrate, decomposes)

So, it may be possible to apply Chlorine and heat to Lunar Regolith and produce O2 and FeCl₃
However perhaps other substances than Iron will absorb some of the Chlorine.  Recovery methods would be desireable.

Materials in this topic may suggest how to separate the Iron and Chlorine.
https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=11305
"Index» Life support systems» Flash Recycling, Salt Electric Mining"
Salt Mining here does not indicated carving salts out of the Earth's crust.  It is rather methods to perhaps use Chlorine and Electrolysis, to extract and recover materials from the Lunar Regolith.

Query: "Rocket using Sodium, Aluminum, and Oxygen?"
Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
Using Sodium, Aluminum, and Oxygen in Rocket Propulsion
A rocket engine can use sodium, aluminum, and oxygen as a propellant system if the sodium is used as an oxidizer and aluminum as the fuel. This is a form of bipropellant or hypergolic chemistry, where the oxidizer and fuel react to produce high‑energy gases for thrust.

How it works
Oxidizer: Sodium (in the form of sodium perchlorate, NaClO₄, or sodium metal) provides oxygen atoms for combustion.

Fuel: Aluminum (often as powder) burns with oxygen to form aluminum oxide (Al₂O₃), releasing large amounts of energy.

Reaction example:
8

Al
+
3

NaClO
4

4

Al
2
O
3
+
3

NaCl

Here, aluminum is oxidized from 0 to +3, and chlorine in perchlorate is reduced from +7 to −1 Numerade.

Performance considerations
High energy density: Aluminum has a high heat of combustion, and sodium perchlorate is a strong oxidizer, giving good specific impulse (Isp) potential.

Thermal management: Sodium is highly reactive and can ignite at low temperatures, so handling requires careful control.

Combustion efficiency: In subscale tests, aluminum–oxygen systems have shown good performance, but mixing and two‑phase flow effects can reduce efficiency NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS).
Applications
Lunar in‑situ propellant: Aluminum and oxygen (LOX) have been proposed for lunar ascent/descent and return missions because oxygen can be produced from lunar regolith water ice NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS).

Hybrid or bipropellant designs: Aluminum can be stored as a solid fuel, with oxygen or sodium‑based oxidizer supplied separately, allowing throttleable thrust and safer handling than all‑solid systems Wikipedia.

Safety and engineering challenges
Reactivity: Sodium metal is pyrophoric and must be handled under inert conditions.

Corrosion: Sodium compounds can be corrosive to certain materials.

Ignition control: Requires precise mixing and ignition systems to avoid uncontrolled combustion.

In summary: Yes, a rocket can use sodium (as oxidizer) with aluminum (as fuel) and oxygen (from sodium compounds or LOX) to produce thrust. This combination offers high energy density and potential for in‑situ resource utilization, but requires careful engineering for safety and efficiency.

OK, so I am going to offer that mixing Sodium with reactive metal fuels from the Moon, might be Oxidized to produce propulsion.
Quote: "Rocket using Sodium, Aluminum, and Oxygen?"
Quote: Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
Using Sodium, Aluminum, and Oxygen in Rocket Propulsion
A rocket engine can use sodium, aluminum, and oxygen as a propellant system if the sodium is used as an oxidizer and aluminum as the fuel. This is a form of bipropellant or hypergolic chemistry, where the oxidizer and fuel react to produce high‑energy gases for thrust.

How it works
Oxidizer: Sodium (in the form of sodium perchlorate, NaClO₄, or sodium metal) provides oxygen atoms for combustion.

Fuel: Aluminum (often as powder) burns with oxygen to form aluminum oxide (Al₂O₃), releasing large amounts of energy.

Reaction example:
8

Al
+
3

NaClO
4

4

Al
2
O
3
+
3

NaCl

Here, aluminum is oxidized from 0 to +3, and chlorine in perchlorate is reduced from +7 to −1 Numerade.

Performance considerations
High energy density: Aluminum has a high heat of combustion, and sodium perchlorate is a strong oxidizer, giving good specific impulse (Isp) potential.

Thermal management: Sodium is highly reactive and can ignite at low temperatures, so handling requires careful control.

Combustion efficiency: In subscale tests, aluminum–oxygen systems have shown good performance, but mixing and two‑phase flow effects can reduce efficiency NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS).
Applications
Lunar in‑situ propellant: Aluminum and oxygen (LOX) have been proposed for lunar ascent/descent and return missions because oxygen can be produced from lunar regolith water ice NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS).

Hybrid or bipropellant designs: Aluminum can be stored as a solid fuel, with oxygen or sodium‑based oxidizer supplied separately, allowing throttleable thrust and safer handling than all‑solid systems Wikipedia.

Safety and engineering challenges
Reactivity: Sodium metal is pyrophoric and must be handled under inert conditions.

Corrosion: Sodium compounds can be corrosive to certain materials.

Ignition control: Requires precise mixing and ignition systems to avoid uncontrolled combustion.

In summary: Yes, a rocket can use sodium (as oxidizer) with aluminum (as fuel) and oxygen (from sodium compounds or LOX) to produce thrust. This combination offers high energy density and potential for in‑situ resource utilization, but requires careful engineering for safety and efficiency.

ctsHuoP.png

The above drawing includes two joined one time fire engines.  The launch assist engine does just that.  The Mass Driver gives some of the energy to do a elliptical orbit of the Moon but the Launch Assist Engine gives the rest.  The device passes to the other side of the Moon, it has to then rotate and the other engine (Orbit Complete Engine) be used to circularize the orbit.

I am planning it this way to reduce the rigors applied to the Mass Driver Device.

In Lunar Orbit, propulsion that uses metal propellants would then retrieve the devices and tow them to a processing location.

You could go to a "L" location and then fire the Orbit Completion Engine, but that requires more propulsive efforts.

The "Brains" could be recycled back to the surface of the Moon for reuse.

In this concept the "Carcasses" of these devices could then be recycled into various types of Spacecraft and Satellites.

I anticipate the brains to be about as smart as drones that are being used, in wars at this time.  (Ukraine, Iran).

The engines would be started and could not stop, they would simply burn out.  The Oxygen might just be compressed Oxygen.

Of course, I am thinking that these would be involved in Mass Production of the devices on the Moon.  Robotic Labor in large quantities would be very much needed.


Ending Pending smile

#3 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Conductive/Metal Propellants with Electric Power » Yesterday 19:44:36

(th) said: https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 07#p240307
Quote:

tahanson43206
Moderator
Registered: 2018-04-27
Posts: 25,176
Email
For Void re study of propulsion using ions...

From quick glances at your many posts I get the impression you are trying to learn about many subjects, and you share little bits of the experience with your readers.

In your recent investigation of propulsion using ions, I was inspired to wonder if any atom (metal or not) might be used for acceleration if it is stripped of electrons.  My impression is that cosmic rays are a category of objects which have been accelerated by stellar forces.  My impression is that magnetic fields in space must be the force that provides the acceleration our instruments record.

In your study of this phenomenon, have you discovered anything that humans are doing to replicate what nature does?

(th)

A path to a possible increase in assesses to improved results is generally worth some investment of time and interest.

I do not fully understand still how a Hall thruster works.  Some of these things are using electric force, and some using magnetic force.

Yes, in sending a power pulse of voltage and current, that vaporizes and even turns the mass to plasma with a magnetic field we mimic Lightning.

But in these devices we might also, think that their maybe magnetic nozzles.  Possibly even a magnetic pulse that may cast the matter of the plasma into a "Action" direction to move a spacecraft into a "Reaction" direction.

It is quite understandable if we do not have all the nuts and bolts of these machines.  I have an idea of what they do and how they do it. but to do it wall must include art not generally casually given away.

But it was true, that typical electric rockets which were using inert gasses as propellants, were historically low powered and the propellants were expensive, such as Xenon.

They were not considered very practical for going to the Moon or Mars.  The were suitable to go to Ceres and Vesta, because given a long running time, they could eventually achieve some valuable things.

But now we are approaching much greater thrusts, and also the propellants generally being solids, are easy to store.

This may bring good results.

The "smell", (Current Indications), of it coming out of the oven is promising.  Of course, I think it needs attention.

Ending Pending smile

#4 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Conductive/Metal Propellants with Electric Power » Yesterday 07:38:14

To add to the just prior post.  It seems that molten salts can conduct electricity.  But I fear corrosion.

Query: "Can Molten salts conduct electricity?"

Quote:

Like

Dislike
Yes, molten salt conducts electricity because its ions are free to move, unlike in solid salt where they are fixed in a crystal lattice.
How Molten Salt Conducts Electricity
Molten salts are ionic compounds that, when heated past their melting point, transition from a rigid solid to a liquid state. In solid form, salts like sodium chloride have positively charged cations and negatively charged anions locked in a fixed crystal lattice, preventing them from moving and making solid salt an electrical insulator
scienceinsights.org
scienceinsights.org
+2
.
When the salt is heated to its melting point (for sodium chloride, around 801°C), the crystal lattice breaks down. The ions become mobile in the liquid, allowing them to carry an electric current. This process, called ionic conduction, differs from metallic conduction because it relies on the physical movement of ions rather than the flow of electrons
scienceinsights.org
scienceinsights.org
+2
.

Mechanism of Conduction
When an external voltage is applied across molten salt:

Cations (positively charged ions) move toward the cathode (negative electrode).
Anions (negatively charged ions) move toward the anode (positive electrode).
This coordinated movement of ions constitutes the electric current. Electrochemical reactions may also occur at the electrodes, where ions gain or lose electrons, forming new chemical species
scienceinsights.org
scienceinsights.org
.
Applications
The high ionic conductivity of molten salts makes them valuable in industrial processes and energy systems:

Aluminum production via the Hall-Héroult process uses molten cryolite to dissolve aluminum oxide for electrolysis
scienceinsights.org
scienceinsights.org
.
Metal purification and extraction of reactive metals that cannot be processed in water-based solutions
scienceinsights.org
scienceinsights.org
+1
.
Advanced energy storage systems, where molten salts serve as both heat transfer fluids and conductive media
scienceinsights.org
scienceinsights.org
.
In summary, molten salts are excellent conductors of electricity due to the freedom of their ions to move in the liquid state, while solid salts remain insulators because their ions are fixed in place
scienceinsights.org
scienceinsights.org
+2
.


But I fear corrosion.  Oxygen is bad enough if it is generated, and Chlorine is even worse.

But perhaps there may be a way.

Ending Pending smile

#5 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Conductive/Metal Propellants with Electric Power » Yesterday 06:24:38

I again will mention that I think that power supplies in orbits may become lighter and perhaps more efficient.  This could be true for Solar panels, and I think also for thermal electric generation.

Thermal Electric Generation could include Nuclear but also Solar.

Here is something that I think I might understand a little.

https://www.motorbiscuit.com/teslas-car … -heard-of/
Quote:

The payoff shows up in two places: the carbon sleeve rotor generates a stronger electromagnetic field than a metal-retained rotor – which is traditionally made from high-strength steel.

The other benefit is that the rotor can sustain higher RPM, since the carbon sleeve largely prevents the copper from expanding outward under radial acceleration.

Both of those things compound: a stronger EM field means more torque from the same amount of current, and higher sustainable RPM means more power from a physically smaller package.

Tesla’s design allows operation in the range of 20,000 rpm – roughly 25% higher than previous motor generations.

So, I am hoping that a similar thing might be done with electric generators, to reduce the dry mass, and increase the output per mass.

Actually, it is more that less eddy currents might be produced which produce heat, and more of the rotational energy might produce usable electricity.  (I hope).

My understanding is that supercritical CO2 can have a very small turbine.

But as I have said, it is also possible that better solar panels mass/output may also show up.

Ending Pending smile

Here is a bit about solar panels as an alternative:
Query: "Lighter weight solar panels for space?"
Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
Lightweight Solar Panels for Space Applications
Lightweight solar panels for space are ultra-thin, flexible, and often made from advanced polymers or thin-film cells, enabling deployment on delicate spacecraft surfaces and reducing launch mass.

Why Lightweight Panels Matter in Space
In space, every kilogram of mass affects launch costs and mission design. Traditional rigid panels with glass substrates are heavy and can damage delicate spacecraft surfaces. Lightweight panels reduce structural load, allow for more flexible deployment, and can be integrated into spacecraft skins or deployable structures Renogy+1.

Key Technologies
Thin-film photovoltaics: Materials like amorphous silicon, cadmium telluride, or copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS) are used to make cells thin and flexible Renogy.

Polymer substrates: Instead of glass, advanced polymers or ultra-thin glass reduce weight while maintaining durability Renogy+1.

Flexible cell designs: Apollo Power’s patented flexible solar cells show minimal efficiency loss after impact (0.7% vs. 4.9% for semi-flexible panels) Apollo Power.

Bifacial and high-efficiency cells: Some portable space-grade panels use N-type cells with up to 25% efficiency, capturing more sunlight in constrained orbits energyreservoir.com.

Space-Specific Benefits
Lower launch mass: Reduces fuel and cost for satellite and spacecraft missions.

Adaptability: Can be mounted on curved or non-load-bearing surfaces without structural reinforcement Apollo Power.

Durability: Designed to withstand space radiation, thermal cycling, and micrometeoroid impacts.

Integration: Can be part of deployable solar arrays or integrated into spacecraft hulls for dual-purpose energy and protection.

Examples & Innovations
Apollo Power flexible panels: Fire-resistant, ultra-lightweight, and suitable for industrial, transportation, and space-like mounting environments Apollo Power.

Starpath ultra-thin space solar panels: Recently unveiled, optimized for low-mass, high-efficiency space deployment Payload.

NASA SBSP research: While not yet operational, NASA studies space-based solar power systems that could benefit from lightweight, high-efficiency panels for in-orbit energy collection NASA.

Considerations for Space Use
Radiation hardening: Essential for long-duration missions.

Thermal management: Lightweight panels must handle extreme temperature swings in space.

Deployment reliability: Must unfold or integrate without snagging or damage.

Efficiency vs. weight trade-off: High-efficiency cells are preferred, but ultra-thin designs can match or exceed terrestrial lightweight panel performance Renogy.

In summary, lightweight solar panels for space combine advanced thin-film or polymer-based cells with ultra-low mass and high durability, enabling more efficient spacecraft design, reduced launch costs, and new deployment possibilities. For mission-critical applications, choosing panels with proven radiation and thermal resilience is key.

And then there is room for further discovery of the propulsion methods themselves.

>>>>>>>>>>

So, I was under the impression that Magdrive could only use Iron, Aluminum, or Copper, but I inquired further:
Query: "What propellants can Magdrive use?"
https://newatlas.com/space/super-magdri … metal-fuel
Quote:

Space Systems
Super Magdrive rocket thrusters run on heavy metal
By Joe Salas
October 05, 2024

Quote:

New metal-eating thrusters gobble iron to power spacecraft forever
Any metal, including iron
Magdrive, a space tech startup, has developed a new kind of space thruster that can use any metal, including iron, as a fuel source. The new thruster could, in theory, refuel on the hop by mining asteroids, providing near-infinite ranges if ever deployed.

The NASA drive focuses on lightweight Lithium to bring up from Earth, in contrast.

Neumann Drive can use almost any metal, and also Carbon and Silicon.

Generally any electrically conductive substance.

I have my eye on table salt.  The reason is that it is a relatively safe way to get Chlorine into space, but Sodium also.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium
Quote:

Melting point    370.944 K (97.794 °C, 208.029 °F)

Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
Sodium (Na) is a highly reactive, soft, silvery-white alkali metal with atomic number 11, essential for both industrial applications and biological functions.
Basic Properties
Sodium has the chemical symbol Na, derived from the Neo-Latin natrium, and an atomic number of 11. It has an atomic mass of approximately 22.98977 and consists of 11 protons, 12 neutrons, and 11 electrons arranged in three electron shells ([Ne]3s¹)
Wikipedia
Wikipedia
+1
. Sodium is a soft, silvery metal that can be cut with a knife at room temperature and is highly reactive, especially with water, forming sodium hydroxide and hydrogen gas
Wikipedia
Wikipedia
+1
. Its crystal structure is body-centered cubic (BCC) with a lattice constant of 4.23 Å
ChemicalAid
ChemicalAid
.

Occurrence and Compounds
Sodium does not occur freely in nature due to its high reactivity. It is commonly found in minerals such as halite (NaCl), feldspars, sodalite, and natron. Sodium compounds are highly soluble in water, making sodium and chlorine the most abundant dissolved elements in oceans
Wikipedia
Wikipedia
+2
. Common sodium compounds include:

Sodium chloride (NaCl) – table salt, used in food and de-icing roads.
Sodium carbonate (Na₂CO₃) – used in glass, detergents, and water softening.
Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) – used in soap and chemical manufacturing.
Sodium sulfate (Na₂SO₄) – used in paper, glass, and detergents
Encyclopedia Britannica
Encyclopedia Britannica
+1
.
Physical and Chemical Characteristics
Density: 0.97 g/cm³
Melting point: 97.8°C
Boiling point: 882.9°C
Mohs hardness: 0.5
Highly reactive with water and oxygen, forming oxides and hydroxides
Science Notes and Projects
Science Notes and Projects
+1
.
Sodium is lighter than water and must be stored under oil to prevent reaction with moisture in the air
Encyclopedia Britannica
Encyclopedia Britannica
.

Here is a topic on Newmars.com that deals with using Chlorine to extract substances from ore, perhaps even Iron.
https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=11305

So, now if Starship can lift Table salt to orbit, then perhaps in orbit of the Moon, Iron/Oxide from the Moon, can be treated with Chlorine extracted from Table salt, while the Sodium is used as a propellant.

This may liberate Oxygen???  Dangerous???  I am not a chemist.

In any case you could drop table salt or Iron Chloride out of a landing ship and recover the salts later, I think.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron(III)_chloride
Quote:

Boiling point   
316 °C (601 °F; 589 K) (anhydrous, decomposes)[1]
280 °C (536 °F; 553 K) (hexahydrate, decomposes)

So, heat of impact may matter and so would scatter.  High impact might scatter the salt.

But say you drop 100 tons of Salts, either Sodium Chloride or Iron Chloride off of a landing ship, then the landing legs do not have to endure the inertia of the 100 tons of salt payload.

Salts being soluble, extracting them from regolith might be facilitated usine water.

Probably high impact speeds are not practical.  But if you dropped the salts in a Lunar night into sized gravel, they might evaporate and then quickly condense on the gravel.

Chlorine and Sodium are available on the Moon, but then you have to mine and process the regolith.

If you deliver Chlorine as part of a salt, then it may be reused many times in the extraction of substances like Iron.  At least that is what I think has been said in the materials of: https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=11305
"Index» Life support systems» Flash Recycling, Salt Electric Mining"

I am hoping that it would be possible to manufacture an Iron Oxide on the Moon, using Chlorine to extract Iron and Oxygen from the Lunar regolith.

The Iron Oxide lifted or (Mass Driver) to orbit, Sodium Chloride from Earth, the Chlorine used to push Oxygen out of the Iron Oxide, and to produce Iron Chloride, and also in the process to produce Sodium metal to use as propulsions at, near, and from the Moon.

Maybe???

Ending Pending smile

#6 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Conductive/Metal Propellants with Electric Power » 2026-07-14 16:57:57

In post #2, (th), said:

A stream of fast moving Lithium atoms would be a hazard for space travelers who happen to be downstream from one of the more powerful engines as described.

Yes, that is somewhat undiscovered, the level of danger.  Of course you would not stand behind a running jet engine either.

Do, these ever throw chunks?  Or is it generally possible to send out just plasma?  The stream should move so fast that the stream would move into the distance at a very high rate.

I suspect that the Neumann Drive is relatively the more passive version of such devices.  (I think).

Query: "What is the ejection speed of the output of a Neumann Drive?"

Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
The Neumann Drive produces plasma exhaust with ejection speeds in the tens of kilometres per second EcoModder.com. This is achieved through its patented Centre‑Triggered Pulsed Cathodic Arc Thruster (CTPCAT) technology, which erodes a solid conductive fuel rod to create plasma that is accelerated away from the spacecraft in short, high‑current pulses EcoModder.com.

In terms of specific performance metrics, the drive has been reported to achieve an Isp (specific impulse) of up to 144km/s under optimal conditions, with a more typical value around 110km/s NASASpaceFlight.com. Specific impulse is directly related to exhaust velocity — higher Isp means higher effective exhaust speed — so these figures indicate that the Neumann Drive’s plasma plume can reach tens of km/s, well above conventional ion thrusters and competitive with some advanced electric propulsion systems.

Key points:

Exhaust velocity: Tens of km/s (exact value depends on operating parameters and fuel choice) EcoModder.com.

Isp range: Up to 144km/s (record), typical ~110km/s NASASpaceFlight.com.

Mechanism: Solid metal fuel rod eroded by cathodic arc discharge into plasma, accelerated without electrostatic grids or neutralisers EcoModder.com.

Advantages: High Isp, high fuel density, no hazardous propellants, quasi‑neutral exhaust, and rapid operational readiness Neumann Space+1.

In summary, the Neumann Drive’s output ejection speed is tens of kilometres per second, with performance metrics placing it among the highest for solid‑fuel electric propulsion systems.

Query: "what is the escape velocity for the solar system?"
Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
The escape velocity of the solar system from Earth's distance is approximately 42.1 km/s (about 26 miles per second)
stackexchange.com
stackexchange.com
+1
. This is the speed required for an object to break free from the Sun's gravitational influence and escape the solar system.

So, perhaps somewhat self-cleaning.  However, I think a magnetic plasma traveling though the Solar wind might get slowed down to it's speed eventually, but still headed out.

Query: "What is the speed of the solar wind?"
Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
Speed of the Solar Wind
The solar wind — a stream of charged particles (mostly electrons, protons, and alpha particles) flowing outward from the Sun’s corona — travels at very high speeds, typically 250–750 km/s (about 450–1,400 miles per second or 1 million–2.5 million miles per hour) when it reaches distances beyond a few solar radii Wikipedia.

Typical Speed Ranges
Fast solar wind: Around 750–800 km/s (≈1.7–1.8 million mph) from coronal holes near the Sun’s poles, especially during periods of low solar activity BIRA-IASB.

Slow solar wind: Around 300–400 km/s (≈600,000–800,000 mph) from streamers and equatorial regions NASA/Marshall Solar Physics+1.

Moderate/high-speed streams: Often 500–700 km/s (≈1–1.3 million mph), which can trigger geomagnetic storms and bright auroras auroramap.org.
Why Speed Varies
The solar wind’s speed depends on its source:

Coronal holes (open magnetic field regions) produce the fastest streams.

Active regions and streamers (closed magnetic field structures) produce slower winds.

Speeds can also change with the Sun’s rotation, creating corotating interaction regions where fast and slow winds meet BIRA-IASB.

Impact of Speed
Higher speeds mean more kinetic energy delivered to Earth’s magnetosphere, increasing the likelihood of auroras and space weather events auroramap.org. For example, speeds above 500 km/s with favorable magnetic field conditions often produce vibrant auroral displays.

In summary: The solar wind’s speed is not constant — it ranges from about 300 km/s (slow) to 800 km/s (fast), with most interplanetary speeds between 400–750 km/s, depending on solar conditions and location Wikipedia+2.

OK, if anything the solar wind may couple to the magnetic plasma plume and drag it out of the inner solar system faster.

In some cases, I think safety could be enhanced by shooting the plume slightly above and then below the orbital plane where the bulk of orbital machinery might "Live".

But the big thing about this is we are beginning to see "Rock Rockets".  That is rocks being converted into propellants.  Any stony or other object can be a propellant source.

And the power supplies available to drive these should continue to improve over time.

Ending Pending smile

#7 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Conductive/Metal Propellants with Electric Power » 2026-07-14 13:04:11

(th) said:

This topic would appear to have significant upside potential, as NewMars members track research and development of more powerful systems.

I agree with that.

Solar Thermal might be another path.  As I recall kdb512 indicated that supercritical CO2 turbines could be a way to get power in space.  I wonder if there will be a Carbon Wrapped Generator that could be more efficient, as the Carbon Wrapped Motor of Tesla.

That is also likely solar cells are still going to get to be better.

If fusion comes into effect or better fission, than there things may have room to improve as well.

As far as NASA doing Nuclear-Electric-Lithium, it is quite possible that some metal from the Moon might eventually be made to work.  Maybe not as well, but well enough.

Ending Pending smile

#8 Interplanetary transportation » Conductive/Metal Propellants with Electric Power » 2026-07-13 06:17:14

Void
Replies: 6

The management can of course give me directions to corrections for this.

Actually, a device reported to be from NASA has me excited.  What I have seen of it is that it uses Lithium.  Lithium is said to be light in the Earth's gravity field, and apparently can work in this device.

And then previously I was aware of Magdrive which champions Iron, Aluminum, and Copper propellants.

Also Neumann Drive reportedly can use most substances in the periodic table.

https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasa-fire … s-to-mars/
Quote:

NASA Fires Up Powerful Lithium-Fed Thruster for Trips to Mars
April 28, 2026

Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
NASA is developing lithium-fed magnetoplasmadynamic (MPD) thrusters, a high-power electric propulsion technology that could enable faster, more efficient missions to Mars.
Overview of Lithium Propellant Technology
NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) is testing lithium-fed MPD thrusters, which use lithium metal vapor as a propellant. Unlike conventional chemical rockets, these thrusters employ strong electric currents interacting with magnetic fields to accelerate lithium plasma, producing continuous thrust over long durations
NASA
NASA
+1
. This method is highly efficient, using up to 90% less propellant than traditional rockets, and allows spacecraft to gradually reach extremely high speeds, such as the 124,000 mph achieved by the Psyche mission’s solar-powered electric thrusters
NASA
NASA
+1
.

Recent Testing and Performance
In February 2026, JPL successfully tested a prototype lithium MPD thruster at 120 kilowatts, over 25 times the power of current high-power electric thrusters
NASA
NASA
+2
. The thruster operated inside the CoMeT (Condensable Metal Propellant) vacuum facility, a specialized chamber designed to safely handle metal vapor propellants and simulate space conditions
NASA
NASA
+1
. During testing, the thruster’s tungsten electrodes reached temperatures above 5,000°F, demonstrating both ignition stability and sustained performance at unprecedented power levels
dailygalaxy.com
dailygalaxy.com
.

Advantages of Lithium Propellants
High thrust and efficiency: Lithium plasma allows greater acceleration than conventional ion or Hall-effect thrusters
NASA
NASA
+1
.
Reduced launch mass: Efficient propellant use lowers the amount of fuel needed, enabling heavier payloads or larger crews for human missions
ScienceDaily
ScienceDaily
+1
.
Scalability: Future designs aim for 500 kilowatts to 1 megawatt per thruster, potentially supporting multi-megawatt systems for crewed Mars missions
NASA
NASA
.
Compatibility with nuclear power: Pairing lithium MPD thrusters with nuclear electric propulsion could sustain long-duration missions while maintaining high speeds and payload capacity
NASA
NASA
+1
.
Solid Propellant Applications
In addition to plasma thrusters, lithium-aluminum alloys are being explored as additives in solid rocket propellants for mass-limited in-space missions. These alloys can improve performance metrics such as delta-velocity and payload efficiency compared to standard aluminized composite propellants
NASA
NASA
.

Future Prospects
NASA’s lithium propulsion research is part of a broader effort to develop megawatt-class electric propulsion systems. Fully operational lithium MPD thrusters could significantly reduce travel time to Mars, support human exploration, and enable new mission architectures previously impractical with conventional propulsion
NASA
NASA
+2
. Challenges remain, including thermal management and long-duration operation, but ongoing tests provide critical data for scaling up these systems.
In summary, lithium propellants represent a promising frontier in electric propulsion, offering high efficiency, strong thrust, and the potential to transform deep space exploration and human missions to Mars.

I was a bit disappointed that Lithium is not very available on the Moon.

But I see that Lithium/Aluminum Alloys are being considered.  But the mention on that is a bit confusing.  It might be refereeing to solid rockets only.

Well, anyway Aluminum can come from the Moon.
https://ptable.com/?lang=en#Properties
https://www.chemistrylearner.com/the-periodic-table
Image Quote: Printable-Periodic-Table.jpg

In the evolution of this new technology, perhaps there may be a element or alloy, that can be obtained on the Moon and would still be light enough to lift from Earth.

If available on the Moon and Earth, then also available on other worlds including asteroids.

Query: "What elements is the Moon made of?"
Quote:

Moon elements

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
Elements and Composition of the Moon
The Moon is a differentiated rocky body made of three main layers — a crust, mantle, and core — with its chemistry dominated by silicate minerals and metals Science Mission Directorate+1.

Major elements
The most abundant elements in the Moon are:

Oxygen (O) – ~45% by weight, mostly in minerals like plagioclase feldspar and pyroxene Wikipedia+1

Silicon (Si) – a key component of lunar silicates sentinelmission.org

Magnesium (Mg) – common in the mantle and basaltic rocks sentinelmission.org

Iron (Fe) – in both silicate minerals and the metallic core sentinelmission.org

Calcium (Ca) – especially abundant in the crust (anorthositic highlands) Wikipedia+1

Aluminum (Al) – also prominent in the crust Wikipedia+1

Minor and trace elements
Other elements present in smaller amounts include:

Titanium (Ti) – concentrated in ilmenite in some mare basalts Wikipedia+1

Manganese (Mn), Chromium (Cr), Sulfur (S), Uranium (U), Thorium (Th), Potassium (K) Wikipedia

Hydrogen (H) – in trace amounts, likely from solar wind Wikipedia

Carbon (C) and Nitrogen (N) – in very small quantities Wikipedia

Mineral composition

Crust: Dominated by plagioclase feldspar (calcium-rich anorthosite in highlands) and anorthositic rocks Geology In+1

Mantle: Rich in olivine, orthopyroxene, and clinopyroxene; more iron-rich than Earth’s mantle Wikipedia+1

Core: Small, metallic iron–nickel alloy with some sulfur Wikipedia

Key differences from Earth
The Moon is depleted in water and volatile elements compared to Earth, and its crust is thicker on the far side Science Mission Directorate+1.

In summary, the Moon is made mostly of oxygen, silicon, magnesium, iron, calcium, and aluminum, with important minor elements like titanium, manganese, and chromium, arranged into a layered structure of crust, mantle, and core.

I wonder about Magnesium or Calcium.

The Neuman Drive can use both of those: https://neumannspace.com/metal-propellants/
Image Quote: Neumann-Space-Periodic-Table-2-Elements-Useable-for-Neumann-Thrusters.svg

But they are not nearly as light as Lithium I am seeming to understand.

Anyway, this could shift the way things might be done, if you could "Ping-Pong" between the Earth and Moon with propellants available at each end.  Particularly if a Mass Driver can move the propellants to an orbit.

Depending on safety issues, a Starship could be carried between LEO and Lunar orbit, and then only need a small number of Metha-Lox propellants to do it's work.

These propulsion systems have a long way to go, I am sure.

But they could be powered by:
1) Direct Solar, (OK for Earth/Moon?)
2) Laser Solar, (Lighter weight, and OK between proximate worlds.
3) Nuclear, Interplanetary.

I would wish I could live another century (Health), so as to see how these systems work out.

Ending Pending smile

#9 Re: Terraformation » AquaWorlds (Water Holding and Water Transporting Methods) » 2026-07-12 17:09:41

I think that quite often the transport of water on Mars may be done by Methane pipeline.  Where a major body of water ice exists, Methane may be produced.  Pipelines, perhaps of cast basalt, can convey it to various locations where it can be reacted with O2 from CO2, to make Water.

ajr1H00.png

Here in another topic is further information: https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=11387

While a little tricky, my hope is that a pure water atmosphere can be split into H2 and O2, and separate with the H2 floating on top.  At a low pressure, I hope that explosive conditions will not be an idea killer for this.

Spitting water if done in a pure way, will avoid the creation of CO which of course is a poison to creatures using Hemoglobin.

Using the Hydrogen and Mars atmosphere, various kinds of Precision Fermentation and Cellular Food Cultures could be done.

Using O2 and biomass created in that manner would support mushroom farming


So, by pipeline Methane moved, and then accumulations of water with an ice and mechanical covering in suitable sized craters.

Mechanical cover could be poly-films as vapor barriers and a manufactured simulation of pumice on top of that.

Manufactured chemicals added may grow things desired.

So, these may be put near points of economic interest such as a mineral deposit.

Ending Pending smile





.

#10 Re: Not So Free Chat » Chat » 2026-07-12 17:02:08

I really don't want to rude or arrogant.  But I think that Solar, Wind, Nuclear Fission, Nuclear Fusion, Natural Hydrogen, and if needed power from orbit are coming, and some of them not that far off.

The Green mentality is pretty much like treating common people like surfs.  They are there to be taxed, to shut up, and to understand that comfort and happiness for their kind is sin.

It is anti-industrial, because humans are a burden on reality anyway.

Never mind that Nature can have all the stars and planets in the galaxy to be "Natural" with.  Except perhaps a few that like us may host what we arrantly claim as intelligence.

I think we have chances of getting through this OK, and even with a raised standard of living for most people.  I think the Earth has endured much worse disruptions than us.  And now that we understand that we need to be better Stewarts, we can invent methods to do so that do not make is poor.

Ending Pending smile

#11 Re: Terraformation » AquaWorlds (Water Holding and Water Transporting Methods) » 2026-07-12 08:02:29

RobertDyck made a useful contribution elsewhere: https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 32#p240232
Quote:

RobertDyck
Moderator
From: Winnipeg, Canada
Registered: 2002-08-20
Posts: 8,467
Email Website
Mars Odyssey used a gamma ray sensor to detect thorium. It produced a map of thorium concentration across the surface of Mars. Again, this is based on gamma ray emissions, with assumption that gamma is produced by thorium. On Earth, thorium is used as an indicator element to find uranium. That means, when there's thorium, there's a good likelihood there's also uranium. I have argued thorium itself can be used as fuel in a nuclear reactor.

JPL March 2003: Map of Martian Thorium at Mid-Latitudes  https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/images/pia0425 … latitudes/

NASA same map, but 2 resolutions: Map of Martian Thorium at Mid-Latitudes https://science.nasa.gov/photojournal/m … latitudes/

As I understand it Uranium is soluble as a salt.  Thorium is not.

So, running water may have moved Uranium Salts to evaporation produced salt flats.  These may be covered to some extent by other weather induced effects.  But useful Uranium is not a guarantee.  However, because Mars has a lack of burnable resources, the value of Uranium or Thorium would be more than on Earth.  It might be worth extracting from "Seawater" or salt deposits.

Over time it is becoming apparent that cooling as well as energy matters for a modern technological society.

Well, the Mars polar ice caps represent a lot of cooling.  And tapping into that cooling might not be too hard.  But you need some tricks, and sources of energy to make it valuable.

While nuclear fission and fusion may well have a place as energy sources, we also have a more expandable energy source in orbit of Mars.

Query: "Could Microwave power beaming work for Mars, even in the dust storms?"

Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
Microwave Power Beaming Through Martian Dust Storms
Microwave power beaming — sending energy from a transmitter (e.g., in orbit or on Mars) to a receiver via a focused microwave beam — could work on Mars, even during dust storms, but with important caveats.

How it works
Space power beaming converts electricity into a directed microwave beam, aimed at a rectenna (rectifying antenna) that converts it back into usable power www.satnow.com+1. On Mars, a space-based transmitter could beam energy to a surface receiver, avoiding the need to carry large onboard power systems.

Why dust storms are a concern
Martian dust storms can block sunlight and severely reduce solar array output, as seen with the Opportunity rover in 2018 NASA+1. However, dust particles are small (about 3 micrometers) and the atmosphere is very thin (~6 mbar vs. Earth’s 1000 mbar) space.sciencearray.com. This means scattering of microwaves is less severe than for sunlight, especially at lower frequencies (e.g., 3–6 GHz) Reddit. Lower frequencies penetrate dust better and are less affected by particle size.

Efficiency trade-offs
Studies suggest that even under clear skies, microwave beaming efficiency from orbit to Mars is low — for example, a 6.28 MW satellite source might deliver only 100 kW at the surface Reddit. Dust storms could further reduce efficiency due to beam scattering and absorption, but the effect is likely less than for solar panels, which can be rendered nearly useless during global storms space.sciencearray.com.

Feasibility in storms

Advantage: Microwave beams are less sensitive to dust than sunlight, so they can remain operational during storms, unlike solar arrays Reddit.

Challenge: Atmospheric scattering still occurs, and beam alignment and receiver design must account for dust-induced signal degradation.

Comparison: Surface solar panels are still viable for short-term or local use, but for long-duration or remote operations, beaming could be more reliable Reddit.
Bottom line
Microwave power beaming can work on Mars during dust storms, especially at lower microwave frequencies, but it will be less efficient than in clear conditions. It’s a promising complement to solar power for missions that need continuous energy, but the system design must optimize for low-scattering frequencies, beam stability, and receiver robustness. For now, it’s more of a backup or supplement than a complete replacement for solar in most scenarios.

This reply downplays the efficiency, but again on a world where burning things is not a significant option an alternate energy source is needed.

In any case, it will be harder to get microwave power to the polar ice caps than to the equator.

But there is no particular rule against the use of ground based solar panels even on top of the ice caps.

In fact it may be a terraforming tool to change the albedo of the ice surface.

There would be various ways to extract coolant from the ice caps here is one.

kB49fBS.png

At some low point in an ice mass a tunnel is melted at an angle into the ice mass.  If needed some Mars air is also pushed in, to make a low pressure.  We only want ice water, nothing much warmer.

A river of water flows and caverns are created.

After the main shaft is created a robot with mirrors can travel into the tunnel and deflect the laser beam to carve significant sized vaults.

It is expected that water fill flow down to the Laser station so, means to handle that are needed.

Now that you have the fluid you may use it for various needs, amount them as cooling.  Either as evaporative cooling or to create ice covered reservoirs.

Fresh water at 0 degrees C can still be warmed a bit more.  3.88888889 degrees C.  This is the densest state for fresh water.  It can accumulate under colder water and that colder water can lie on top of ice water.

Shafts created by Laser mining of Ice could be abandoned, but various resources could be used to make them useful habitation, mostly for robots and machinery.

Carbon, it seems may serve as a electrical conductor, so transferring energy though VOIDS in the ice caps may be possible.

Query: "Carbon as an electric device?"
Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
Carbon in Electric Devices
Carbon is a versatile material in electrical engineering, used in both traditional and cutting-edge devices due to its unique combination of electrical, thermal, and mechanical properties.

Traditional electrical applications

Filaments in incandescent lamps: Carbon filaments (often from graphite or carbonized materials) have high resistivity and a melting point around 3500°C, making them suitable for lighting applications Electrical4U.

Electrical contacts: Carbon fibers or graphite enhance contact strength, reduce wear, and lower contact resistance in switches and relays Electrical4U.

Resistors: Carbon’s high resistivity, high melting point, and low temperature coefficient make it ideal for fixed resistors in electronic circuits Electrical4U.

Brushes for DC machines and alternators: Graphite carbon brushes offer high thermal stability and improved commutation Electrical4U.

Electrodes: Used in arc lighting, welding, electric furnaces, and battery cell elements Electrical4U.

Electromagnetic shielding: Carbon composites can block electromagnetic interference Personal websites at UB.

Modern and advanced uses

Conductive additives: Carbon black or fibers are added to polymers to improve electrical conductivity in composites Personal websites at UB.

All-carbon conductors: Carbon nanotubes, graphene, and carbon fibers can replace or supplement metal wiring, offering lightweight, flexible, and corrosion-resistant alternatives Frontiers.

Electronic devices: Functionalized carbon materials (graphene, CNTs) are used in sensors, supercapacitors, inkjet printer inks, and wearable electronics MDPI.

High-performance electronics: Carbon nanotubes are being explored as post-silicon transistors, offering high gate controllability and potential to overcome silicon scaling limits MDPI.

Why carbon works
Carbon’s electrical conductivity depends on its structure—graphite conducts well in-plane, while amorphous or low-crystallinity forms are less conductive but mechanically robust Personal websites at UB. Its high thermal stability, chemical inertness, and ability to be engineered at the nanoscale make it adaptable for both simple and complex devices.

In summary, carbon—from graphite filaments to nanotube-based transistors—plays a key role in electric devices, spanning from everyday lighting and contacts to next-generation flexible and high-performance electronics.

And on Mers with water and Mars atmosphere making plastics is possible.

Regolith can be sintered into objects basalt can be cast into objects.

5PymmUo.png

Tents with good insulation and heat pumps can manage a situation under ice.

One habitat is anchored to the Regolith.  The other is "Floating" in the ice.  You could ballast the floater with extra regolith or sinter blocks.

Laser tunnels could make sure that you could drain the setup into a sea, or evaporation cool some process such as a reactor.  Not only lasers but excess heat from machinery operating could be used to continually melt more chambers. 

Later on when cooling from digging tunnels was no longer practica as all space has been taken, up new snow accumulated on the surface of the cap could be dropped down shafts to provide coolants.

A vast city with enormous productive capability might be made to exist at each ice cap.  Also, Korolev Crater.

Liquid water output which served to cool the industrial activities could be routed to reservoirs of water covered with ice and manufactured materials.

Salts dissolved in the waters of these reservoirs may come to contain Uranium and Lithium Salts.

If there are salt domes under the reservoirs they can be drilled into and turned into storage devices for fluid products and for heat.

Ending Pending smile

From post #20:

Quote:

So, from my point of view we want all three options for Mars: IfZqon4.png

So, as I have previously thought, propellants manufactured in orbit.  Some habitations and some solar power plants to beam power down to the surface.  In the ice masses, large manufacturing cities.

At the Equator, Farming with a massive buried ice reservoir of water.

Ending Pending smile


.

#12 Re: Civilization and Culture » Civilization collapse, signs of the past and may be happening now » 2026-07-11 11:36:43

Has it ever occurred to you that the East India company had two ends?  The UK/Europe end and the places they went at the other end.  Do you think it possible that gangsters at that other end have control of your quislings at your end now?  Weaken you.  Colonize you, and then the Carbon can be burned.

My notions are that civilizations that start sweet end as vinegar.  In such cultures the game is for the rich to weaken the weak even more.
In a sweet culture, the elites produce more.  They are makers not takers.

Domination is Satanic.

A treatment to hope to keep a culture from becoming vinegar, is to bring genes and memes repeatedly back into that population.  Otherwise, you have to kill the vinegars, and the vinegars are very good at killing the wrong people.

When we get past this obsession of reducing the population, and if artificial wombs are possible, then brining more genes back to life may be possible.  In other words we do not have to kill the "Football Hearos" or the "Cheerleaders", we just create a bigger population not like them that they can hold in contempt.

The possibility might exist for 3 or 4 parent children.  So, instead of adopting a child that is no genetic part of you, you might adopt one that is 25% or 33% part of you.  Of course, certain religious constraints might need consideration.

But this might be a way of bringing back a bigger proportion of useful genes in the population rather than redundant escalation of types which all have to be the most important "Football Hero" or the prettiest "Cheerleader".

And it is possible that not all the genes in the ground belong there.

Nature is wicked.  It only values dominance.

We can see that breeds of dogs are not all of the same temperament or utility.

Do we want all dogs to be Pit Bulls?

Ending Pending smile

#13 Re: Terraformation » AquaWorlds (Water Holding and Water Transporting Methods) » 2026-07-11 10:15:24

(th) made a request after reading post #20 which I created today: https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 28#p240228
Quote:

tahanson43206
Moderator
Registered: 2018-04-27
Posts: 25,118
Email
For Void ... in a recent post, in mid July 2026, you offered an intriguing idea that Uranium might be found in the oceans of objects other than the Earth.

This is an idea that needs to be pursued to see if can be supported by evidence, or if it must be labeled as pure speculation.

Please see if one of the AI systems can find evidence to support your interesting idea.

(th)

So, far, AI is cautious and perhaps rightfully anticipates that the Uranium salts of Mars will be less than those of Earth.
But less is not necessarily a loss.  If the Uranium that could be found can be extracted for a benefit desired, less is not an issue.

I expect that as I think Mars may have more Lithium than Earth, it may well have less Urainium.  Mars in general is more composed of lighter materials than is the Earth.

https://newspaceeconomy.ca/2024/12/30/u … lications/
Quote:

Uranium on Mars: Potential and Implications
Author: NSE Staff | Published: 12/30/24

AI says:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
While uranium likely exists on Mars, there is no direct evidence that ancient Martian seas contained uranium salts, though geochemical conditions could have allowed trace amounts to dissolve or precipitate.
Uranium on Mars
Mars is known to contain uranium in its crust, though in lower concentrations than Earth. Geological studies suggest that volcanic activity, sedimentary processes, and hydrothermal systems could have concentrated uranium in certain regions of the Martian crust
newspaceeconomy.ca
newspaceeconomy.ca
+1
. Martian meteorites analyzed on Earth contain trace amounts of uranium, indicating that the element is present in Martian rocks
newspaceeconomy.ca
newspaceeconomy.ca
. Remote sensing has also detected elements like thorium and potassium, which often co-occur with uranium on Earth, suggesting that uranium may exist in similar contexts on Mars
newspaceeconomy.ca
newspaceeconomy.ca
+1
.

Ancient Martian Water and Salt Deposits
Evidence indicates that Mars once had large bodies of liquid water, including oceans in the northern hemisphere and lakes in craters like Jezero
Wikipedia
Wikipedia
+1
. Salt deposits on Mars, primarily composed of magnesium and sulfur compounds similar to Epsom salts, suggest repeated cycles of water evaporation and mineral precipitation
The University of Chicago
The University of Chicago
. These salts formed under conditions that allowed dissolved minerals to concentrate as water evaporated, but analyses so far have not identified uranium salts among them
The University of Chicago
The University of Chicago
.

Possibility of Uranium Salts
On Earth, uranium can form soluble salts in water, particularly under oxidizing conditions, and precipitate as minerals like uraninite or carnotite in sedimentary environments. If Martian seas were chemically similar to terrestrial waters, trace uranium could have dissolved and potentially precipitated as salts in localized areas, especially where hydrothermal activity or volcanic inputs enriched the water with uranium
newspaceeconomy.ca
newspaceeconomy.ca
+1
. However, the dominant salts detected on Mars are magnesium and sulfate-based, and no direct detection of uranium salts has been reported in Martian sediments or evaporites
The University of Chicago
The University of Chicago
.

Conclusion
While Mars has uranium in its crust and ancient seas existed, there is currently no direct evidence that uranium salts were a significant component of Martian waters. It remains plausible that trace amounts could have been present, particularly in regions influenced by volcanic or hydrothermal activity, but the primary salts identified in Martian deposits are magnesium and sulfate compounds
newspaceeconomy.ca
newspaceeconomy.ca
+1
. Future in-situ analyses by rovers or sample return missions may clarify whether uranium ever formed salts in Martian aquatic environments.

I think that these AI declarations should be taken with a pinch of salt.  It looks as though they try appearing to be wise by not taking risks.
If I don't take a chance I can never be wrong is the notion, but we are wrong to be that way.

I am surprised that AI tried to answer this query: "At its maximum axis tilt how warm might the North pole of Mars become?"
Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
Maximum Warmth of Mars’ North Pole at Extreme Axial Tilt
If Mars’ axial tilt were at its maximum historical value — around 80° — the planet would be nearly “pole-on” to the Sun, with the north pole receiving direct, year-round sunlight Mars Odyssey Mission THEMIS. This would be the opposite of today’s climate, when the north pole is in permanent winter darkness.

At such an extreme tilt, the north pole would be the warmest region on Mars, while the equator and southern hemisphere would be in prolonged darkness and extreme cold Mars Odyssey Mission THEMIS. The warmth would be driven by:

Direct solar irradiance: The north pole would be exposed to sunlight for most of the Martian year, avoiding the long winter shadows that dominate today.

Seasonal CO₂ ice sublimation: In spring, the CO₂ frost covering the north pole would sublimate into the atmosphere, thickening it and potentially triggering dust storms CompleteEra.

Atmospheric circulation: Warm air from the equator would flow toward the pole, but the extreme tilt would still keep the pole in the Sun’s direct beam.

While exact surface temperatures at 80° tilt are not directly measured, climate models suggest that the north pole could warm to several degrees Celsius above today’s average winter temperatures — perhaps in the –20°C to –10°C range in spring/summer — compared to today’s –125°C winter lows CompleteEra+1. This is still far colder than Earth’s tropics, but it would be dramatically warmer than the current Martian north pole.

Key points:

Current north pole winter: ~–125°C, permanent darkness CompleteEra.

At 80° tilt: Direct sunlight year-round, CO₂ ice sublimation, possible dust storms.

Estimated warmth: –20°C to –10°C in spring/summer, much milder than today’s pole.

In short, at maximum tilt, the Martian north pole could become a relatively warm, sunlit region — but still far colder than Earth’s equatorial zones — with seasonal CO₂-driven atmospheric changes.

It did not get it entirely right. the North Pole would have about 1/2 year of sunlight and 1/2 year of dark as it does now.  And the South Pole would have the inverse at the same time.  This might create conditions where the CO2 has nowhere to condense so the atmosphere may be thicker.  Continuous sunlight on dirty ice or snow could possibly melt water even at -10 or -20 C.

But also, during the time where ice is sublimating from the North pole and migrating to the Equator and South pole, the greenhouse gas H20 would be greater in the atmosphere, and may provide additional warming.

And then we can roll back time.  Billions of years ago the atmosphere was thicker, and the crust was warmer, and Volcano's occasionally erupted.  So, melting events at the North Pole may have been possible under the most extreme conditions to allow warming.

https://airandspace.si.edu/multimedia-g … r-cap-mars
Image Quote: PressRelease_Ice%20%28002%29_0.jpg.webp?itok=8OsFRPvb

Query:

Does the North Polar ice Cap of Mars press the crust of Mars down?

The AI answer here is very interesting!
Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
Yes — the North Polar ice cap of Mars does press the crust down, but the effect is much smaller and slower than on Earth because of Mars’s cold, stiff interior.

Recent geophysical studies using orbital radar data have shown that the ~3km‑thick ice sheet at Mars’s north pole bends the rocky crust beneath it at a rate of about 0.13mm per year DLR Portal. This is a measurable deformation, but it is far slower than the glacial isostatic adjustment seen on Earth, where ice sheets can depress the crust by many metres over thousands of years.

The reason for this slow response is that Mars’s mantle is highly viscous — roughly 10 to 100 times more viscous than Earth’s DLR Portal. This stiffness means the crust deforms little under the ice’s weight, and the depression is still not large enough to be easily detected from orbit. The ice cap itself is also relatively young, having formed only 2–12million years ago, so the crust has not had enough time to settle significantly TU Delft+1.

In short:

Yes, the ice cap depresses the crust.

The depression is small and slow due to Mars’s cold, stiff mantle.

The ice is young, so the crust is still adjusting downward rather than having fully settled.

This process is similar to glacial isostatic adjustment on Earth, but on Mars it’s a much more gradual and subtle effect.

Quote:

2–12million years ago

Query: "When did the mid latitude ice sheets of Mars form?"
Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
Formation Timing of Mars’ Mid-Latitude Ice Sheets
Recent research indicates that the mid-latitude subsurface ice on Mars is the remnant of a past ice sheet that formed when the planet’s obliquity (axial tilt) was higher than today, allowing ice to accumulate at lower latitudes arXiv.org.

Using improved Mars climate models, scientists estimate that the ice was emplaced about 630,000 years ago at latitudes of 40–55°N, when obliquity was around 35–40° arXiv.org. This timing explains why the ice today is buried 25–150cm (and up to 255cm in some cases) beneath regolith, with depth variations matching observations. The study concludes that the ice is younger than 4 million years arXiv.org.

However, broader geological and climate modeling shows that Mars was once covered by thick, widespread ice sheets during periods of high obliquity. Around 640 million years ago, the planet likely had a much wetter, colder climate with extensive ice coverage www.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp. Over hundreds of millions of years, obliquity cycles caused ice to advance and retreat, with the most recent major accumulation event occurring about 98 million years ago, when ice was deposited in localized “cold traps” in mid-latitude craters www.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp.

In summary:

Recent buried ice: ~630kyr ago, during a high-obliquity phase (~35–40°) arXiv.org.

Earlier ice sheets: As far back as ~640Myr ago, during a much colder, wetter climate www.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp.

Latest major accumulation: ~98Myr ago, in localized mid-latitude cold traps www.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp.

These findings show that Mars’ mid-latitude ice has a long, multi-stage history, tied directly to changes in the planet’s orbital and axial parameters.

So, I suggest that the argument between dust and exposed ice also have had effects at times.
Query:

High Altitude Clouds May have warmed Mars in the Past?

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2101959118
Quote:

Warm early Mars surface enabled by high-altitude water ice clouds
Edwin S. Kite https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1426-1186 kite@uchicago.edu, Liam J. Steele https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6611-0179, Michael A. Mischna https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8022-5319, and Mark I. Richardson https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9633-4141Authors Info & Affiliations
Edited by Mark Thiemens, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, and approved March 10, 2021 (received for review February 4, 2021)
April 26, 2021
118 (18) e2101959118
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2101959118

Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
High‑Altitude Icy Clouds May Have Warmed Early Mars
A new study suggests that thin layers of icy, high‑altitude clouds could have kept early Mars warm enough to support lakes and rivers for hundreds of years, despite the planet receiving only about one‑third of today’s sunlight University of Chicago News+1.

The Climate Puzzle
Mars today is a cold desert, but geological evidence shows it once had flowing rivers and lakes. Models of a simple greenhouse effect using CO₂ and water vapor alone predict temperatures too cold for liquid water. Earlier ideas, such as asteroid impacts, could not explain the long‑term warmth seen in the geologic record University of Chicago News+1.

The Cloud Greenhouse Hypothesis
The University of Chicago team, led by Edwin Kite, revisited the idea of radiatively active water ice clouds in the upper atmosphere, similar to cirrus clouds on Earth. These clouds can trap heat and create a greenhouse effect, even if they are thin SYFY Official Site.

Why Patchy Ice Matters
The key finding was that warm, stable climates only emerged when surface water ice was patchy, not widespread.

Extensive surface ice led to thick, low clouds that reflected sunlight and cooled the planet.

Patchy ice meant less surface moisture, allowing high‑altitude clouds to form and persist. These clouds warmed the planet by trapping heat, while the arid conditions prevented excessive cloud formation pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov+1.

How the Model Works
Using a 3D global climate model, the researchers simulated:

A dynamic water cycle with cloud particle sedimentation and snow‑out thresholds.

Sublimation of ice particles as they fell, moistening the subcloud layer.

Modest updrafts sustaining large amounts of high‑altitude cloud sseh.uchicago.edu.

The simulations showed Mars could reach average annual temperatures around 265K—warm enough for low‑latitude lakes—and stay that way for centuries pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

Implications
This mechanism supports the idea of a warm, arid early Mars climate, consistent with geological data. It also suggests that lakes could have been fed by groundwater upwelling or melting ice during a cold‑to‑warm transition sseh.uchicago.edu.

In short, high‑altitude icy clouds may have been the missing piece in explaining how Mars stayed habitable for so long before it became the cold desert we see today.

I have suggested a robot city be built inside the North Polar Ice Cap.  The waste heat would require disposal.  One method would be to vaporize water and expel it to the atmosphere.

Another way would be to melt vast vaults in the interior of the ice and flow cold water out to the edge of the ice cap to fill a sea that might ring the ice cap.

That might pick up salt deposits as it expanded, and those deposits may contain some Uranium salts.

Power beamed down by way of Microwave might also help to keep the ice covered sea melted under the ice.

By creating more moisture in the atmosphere doing this high altitude clouds may form, warming the planet.

So, there may be some virtue in creating such a sea, to extract Lithium and Uranium Salts from it and also to be "Farmable" waters.

Well, I am stopping now.  If you are tired, imagine how I am.

Ending Pending smile

#14 Re: Terraformation » AquaWorlds (Water Holding and Water Transporting Methods) » 2026-07-11 09:28:29

What I have been pondering is the economics of Uranium and Thorium.

While it is probable the much of these will be wanted on Earth, it appears that the Oceans of Earth are full of dissolved Uranium.  I presume that briny water all of the solar system may be similar.

The price of extracting Uranium from sea water may or may not become economical for use on Earth.  If it does not become economic on Earth, it may be worthwhile in space.

If Enceladus is lifeless, could Uranium be extracted from its Ocean?

What about Mars aquifers?

I am a big fan of Solar power in orbits.  But as you go further out into the solar system, Stationary solar power makes sense.  At Ceres, in orbit you could have a 10 to 1 mirror to concentrate light.  But as you mirrors get bigger and bigger they become cumbersome and even may have excessive "Dry Mass".

So, I have become a fan of fission, as it is going to exist if we use it or not.  Someone will use it and it might as well be us.

So, the value of Uranium or Thorium is different at different worlds, and also different on the surface than it is in orbits.

The water very deep on Mars might be worth seeking if the Uranium in it may be useful to power traveling spaceships.

If humans choose to turn the south ice cap of Mars in to a giant robot city, for the North Ice cap melting might be the thing to do.  If you could inflate a ocean in the North, it may bring life to the planet and also the Uranium might be made available in the sea water.

You might turn a mostly ice-covered ocean into a radiator.  Suppose you put rectenna's on top of the ice, and beamed power from space.

You could have manufacturing processes in the water and in the crust under the water.  The waste heat would percolate into the water and keep it melted.  The more heat you put into the sea, the thinner the ice would be.

But over time additional water may accumulate from this North Sea to the South Pole, so you would simply melt ice and snow (Cooling processes) and funnel the melt water down the south hemisphere to the North Ocean, and generate electricity from Hydro-electric process.

The Uranium could be very useful in reaching out to the outer solar system where you might get more materials to further terraform Mars.

If Lithium is also available from the sea water, then you have a propellant that the Uranium can drive.

https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasa-fire … s-to-mars/

Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
NASA is developing lithium-fed magnetoplasmadynamic (MPD) thrusters, a high-power electric propulsion technology that could enable faster, more efficient missions to Mars.
Overview of Lithium Propellant Technology
NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) is testing lithium-fed MPD thrusters, which use lithium metal vapor as a propellant. Unlike conventional chemical rockets, these thrusters employ strong electric currents interacting with magnetic fields to accelerate lithium plasma, producing continuous thrust over long durations
NASA
NASA
+1
. This method is highly efficient, using up to 90% less propellant than traditional rockets, and allows spacecraft to gradually reach extremely high speeds, such as the 124,000 mph achieved by the Psyche mission’s solar-powered electric thrusters
NASA
NASA
+1
.

Recent Testing and Performance
In February 2026, JPL successfully tested a prototype lithium MPD thruster at 120 kilowatts, over 25 times the power of current high-power electric thrusters
NASA
NASA
+2
. The thruster operated inside the CoMeT (Condensable Metal Propellant) vacuum facility, a specialized chamber designed to safely handle metal vapor propellants and simulate space conditions
NASA
NASA
+1
. During testing, the thruster’s tungsten electrodes reached temperatures above 5,000°F, demonstrating both ignition stability and sustained performance at unprecedented power levels
dailygalaxy.com
dailygalaxy.com
.

Advantages of Lithium Propellants
High thrust and efficiency: Lithium plasma allows greater acceleration than conventional ion or Hall-effect thrusters
NASA
NASA
+1
.
Reduced launch mass: Efficient propellant use lowers the amount of fuel needed, enabling heavier payloads or larger crews for human missions
ScienceDaily
ScienceDaily
+1
.
Scalability: Future designs aim for 500 kilowatts to 1 megawatt per thruster, potentially supporting multi-megawatt systems for crewed Mars missions
NASA
NASA
.
Compatibility with nuclear power: Pairing lithium MPD thrusters with nuclear electric propulsion could sustain long-duration missions while maintaining high speeds and payload capacity
NASA
NASA
+1
.
Solid Propellant Applications
In addition to plasma thrusters, lithium-aluminum alloys are being explored as additives in solid rocket propellants for mass-limited in-space missions. These alloys can improve performance metrics such as delta-velocity and payload efficiency compared to standard aluminized composite propellants
NASA
NASA
.

Future Prospects
NASA’s lithium propulsion research is part of a broader effort to develop megawatt-class electric propulsion systems. Fully operational lithium MPD thrusters could significantly reduce travel time to Mars, support human exploration, and enable new mission architectures previously impractical with conventional propulsion
NASA
NASA
+2
. Challenges remain, including thermal management and long-duration operation, but ongoing tests provide critical data for scaling up these systems.
In summary, lithium propellants represent a promising frontier in electric propulsion, offering high efficiency, strong thrust, and the potential to transform deep space exploration and human missions to Mars.

I also like the Magdrive and Neumann Drives, and they may be of value as well, but this one from NASA looks rather special.

Even Starships newly minted on Earth, might be brought to Mars orbits using Nuclear-Electric-Lithium-Plasma methods.
Then upon arrival to be refilled with Methane and Oxygen, to begin service, or to land and become housing.

Ending Pending smile

Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
Lithium on Mars
Lithium is a lightweight, reactive metal essential for modern batteries, alloys, and various industrial applications. On Mars, it is not abundant in the same concentrated form as on Earth, but it may have been concentrated in salt deposits during periods when liquid water was present marspedia.org. Some Martian meteorites have detected lithium chloride salts, suggesting that lithium could be preserved in certain mineral forms marspedia.org.

Possible Sources and Formation
On Earth, lithium is found in salt flats (brines) from ancient lake evaporation and in pegmatite igneous rocks. Mars’ volcanic history and widespread cratering indicate past geologic activity that could have produced similar environments. Magma cooling and hydrothermal processes on Mars may have concentrated incompatible elements, including lithium, in mineral veins or salt deposits Wikipedia. The presence of ancient water and brine systems could have left behind lithium-rich salts.

Research and Detection
While no large-scale, easily extractable lithium ore fields have been confirmed on Mars, studies of Martian meteorites and surface samples have found trace lithium in chloride form marspedia.org. This suggests that lithium could be present in small quantities in certain Martian minerals, but not in the economically viable concentrations for immediate mining.

Future Use in Mars Missions
Lithium is of interest for future Mars bases because of its role in energy storage. Scientists are developing lithium–Mars gas batteries (LMGBs) that can generate electricity directly from Martian atmospheric gases like carbon dioxide Phys.org+1. These batteries could be more efficient and less reliant on transporting fuel from Earth. Research has shown that Mars’ day-night temperature swings can be harnessed in a temperature-adaptive charging protocol to improve battery lifespan and performance Phys.org+1.

Summary
Presence: Trace lithium detected in Martian meteorites and possibly in salt deposits from ancient water systems marspedia.org.

Formation: Could have been concentrated in brines or hydrothermal veins during Mars’ wetter past Wikipedia.

Potential Use: Key for future Mars energy storage, especially in LMGBs that use local CO₂ Phys.org+1.

Status: Not yet in large, exploitable deposits, but research is ongoing for extraction and battery applications.

In short, lithium on Mars is not yet a major resource, but it may be recoverable in small amounts from certain minerals, and its importance for Martian energy systems is driving targeted research.

 

My understanding is that if Mars had a time period where its atmosphere was 2 bar, cosmic rays may have created a lot of Lithium.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1208.6311
Quote:

Lithium generated by cosmic rays: an estimator of the
time that Mars had a thicker atmosphere and liquid
water
Hector Javier Durand-Manterola
Space Science Department, Institute of Geophysics, National Autonomous University of
Mexico
hdurand_manterola@yahoo.com
Abstract
Lithium is overabundant in cosmic rays because protons impact on carbon and oxygen
nuclei and fission them. Among the products of this fission is lithium.

So, this makes me wonder if icy worlds may have lithium created in their ices?

We don't know yet I am sure.

Ending Pending smile

OK, this disputes the Cosmic Ray origination of Lithium as the major source.  Instead NOVA the major source.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswith … smic-rays/  Quote:

Lithium Mystery Solved: It's Exploding Stars, Not The Big Bang Or Cosmic Rays
Starts With A Bang
ByEthan Siegel,Former Contributor. The Universe is out there, waiting for you to discover it.
for Starts With A Bang
Jun 03, 2020, 02:00am EDTJun 03, 2020, 03:42am EDT

Well, that is good news if true.  As lighter elements were pushed away from the sun more easily, it may be that Lithium will in greater quantities on Mars.

Ending Pending smile

#15 Re: Civilization and Culture » Civilization collapse, signs of the past and may be happening now » 2026-07-11 08:33:59

OK, I will bite.  Or you may think I bite.  Doesn't matter to me.

You have to consider the set of genes and memes that existed at the time of the birth of a civilization.

If a fortunate period of material events occurs to people who have been weeded by a wilderness to have practical sets of genes and memes the perhaps something will emerge.  My thinking is that there has to be a certain amount of willing consent by the group of participants.

They have emerged from Humans against Nature, or Humans in tune with Nature, but now find a way to get more material goods out of there habitations.  If they succeed in warding off their natural predators, such as animals, diseases, and outsiders, they have a period of time to ride on their original set of genes and memes, which may be properly tuned for the weather, and other imposed circumstances.

But nature does not respect this.  Nature will try to tune a "Winner" out of the set of genes and memes, and so internal predation will occur.

Little by little the "Football Heros" will displace the other variations of types.  And the "Cheerleaders" will become more and more oriented towards wanting this "Best" sort of Man as he has privileges, he can dispense to them.

Over time consent is replaced with compulsion.  At some point it may make more sense for the original genes and memes to return to the jungle, and then the "Football Hero's" and Cheerleaders have no-one to compel to surrender wealth they may appropriate.

You would have thought that big Americans could beat the heck out of the Vietnam people, and sometimes they did, but the Vietnamese were tuned for the circumstances of their environment.

The Romans went through a period where the females basically felt that they disserved a free ride and were not going to consent to partnerships with men that could be trusted.

Our system is just enthusiastic for Sports hero's and fussy women.  Do that for too long, and you "Ain't got nutten".

Bigger is not always better.  If it were we might all be 20 feet tall.

And yes, they wore out the soil, and the climate may well have changed.  But they were no longer adapted to deal with change.  They only had gluttony as their guide to morality.  And who among the capable would want to save them from themselves?

Ending Pending smile

#16 Re: Terraformation » AquaWorlds (Water Holding and Water Transporting Methods) » 2026-07-11 07:30:22

From (th) & RobertDyck: https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 17#p240217
Quote:

tahanson43206
Moderator
Registered: 2018-04-27
Posts: 25,113
Email
For Void re post about possible use of CO as a propellant with LOX...

The post in which this item appears was interesting.  Thank you for doing the research to bring those ideas into view.

It is possible that you might have missed a detail due to the large quantity of information you collected.

Please investigate to see if the source for this quote was taken out of context?

Storage: CO liquefies at about -191.5°C, colder than LOX (-183°C), so LOX tanks would need to be insulated to prevent CO from freezing Space Exploration Stack Exchange.

That quote was pulled (apparently) from a web site where people without qualifications are free to make statements that make no sense. If you were willing to take the time to investigate, I would be interested in the facts of this situation.  The statement quoted seems to imply that the colder substance might freeze if brought into contact with a warmer substance, so the reader is left unsure of what is proposed.

(th)

Online

Like button can go here

Report Quote
#263Yesterday 21:54:45
RobertDyck
Moderator
From: Winnipeg, Canada
Registered: 2002-08-20
Posts: 8,461
Email Website
CO & LOX have a Specific Impulse (Isp) of 250 to 290 seconds in vacuum. That's poor. NASA looked at this as a means of Insitu Propellant Production before Robert Zubrin. His improvement was to bring hydrogen from Earth, used the sabatier process to convert to liquid methane. Which has Isp of 350 to 380 seconds. And LCH4 boiling temperature is -127.3°C at 10 bar pressure. So moderate pressure in the tank. Not even as cold as LOX. That makes it easy to work with.

Thanks for the inputs.  I am not supposed to respond at the topic where (th) posted his post.

So, here then (th):  Yes those numbers are puzzling.
CO Melting point    −205.02 °C (−337.04 °F; 68.13 K)
CH4 Melting point    −182.456 °C (−296.421 °F; 90.694 K)[3]
O2 Melting point    (O2) 54.36 K (−218.79 °C, −361.82 °F)

Boiling points?  May be pressure related?
CO Boiling point −191.5 °C (−312.7 °F; 81.6 K)
CH4 Boiling Point −161.49 °C (−258.68 °F; 111.66 K)[4]
O2 Boiling point    −161.49 °C (−258.68 °F; 111.66 K)[4]

Well, if you did need an insulated partition, the gravity of Mars is 1/3rd that of Earth. 
SpaceX likes to chill it's propellants below boiling point to avoid cavitation in pumps/turbines, and the shrink the size of the load.
-182 C might work for all.

And we have the question is the CO and Methane mixed together?  If so, then the melting point may be different than either, possibly a lower than temperature than either.

If you have three tanks, then of course you increase the dry mass and have to have two different types of engines (Likely).

But the gravity is 1/3rd that of Earth.

For Robert:  The idea of Mars Direct, and on site O2 and Methane production, is like an Olympic medal winner.  It rules out 2/3rds of the surface of Mars at the start, as 2/3rds do not seem to have large amounts of water resource.

The is the problem of binary evaluation for important decision making.  The choice is not wrong, it is well calculated, but only focuses on a narrow region of probable success.

For the moment I have had to make a best guess, as to which worlds have significant Carbon and Hydrogen.  I am expecting that Mars does have both, and that Phobos and Deimos have only Carbon in quantity and very little accessible Hydrogen.  We can expect that all three have Oxygen.

Again, all I am doing is seeking a list of options.  Particularly for Orbital operations of Mars, CO/O2 might be "Good Enough" to get something done.  And it is possible that a fuel mix may be "Good Enough" for communication between the surface and orbits. 

You could have a starship with 9 engines.  Maybe 6 Hydro lox, and 3 CO.  On the surface of Mars fill 3 tanks, CO, CH4, and O2.
At Phobos or Deimos fill only the CO and O2.

A tank of CO and 3 CO engines might be good enough to land the Starship.  It may even be possible that the CH4 tank could be filled with Liquid CO at times, but that would be tricky.  You could not run the CH4 engines on the CO without damaging them I expect.

>>>>>>>>>>>>

The problem is gluttonous thinking.  Size matters, and sizes matter.  Sometimes "Big" is impressive but interferes with capable.

I have hesitated to comment on your post about civilizations, but the above would-be part of my post if I did.

Ending Pending smile

I confess though my mind is now on the idea of Lithium Plasma drives that NASA is looking into.

Both Earth and Mars are expected to have Lithium, Mars may even have more.

In such a future we might not be using Methane or CO and Oxygen for transit between planets.

Ending Pending smile

#17 Re: Terraformation » AquaWorlds (Water Holding and Water Transporting Methods) » 2026-07-10 19:26:58

Continuing with the previous post:

Query: "Is there Carbon in Phobos and Deimos?"

Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
Yes — both Phobos and Deimos contain carbon, but it’s not in the form of free elemental carbon; instead, the carbon is part of carbon-rich surface materials that give them their dark, low-albedo appearance.

Reflectance spectroscopy of both moons shows abundant carbon, which is consistent with a composition similar to carbonaceous chondrites — a type of meteorite rich in organic compounds and carbon-bearing minerals NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS). This carbon content is not typical of Martian surface materials, suggesting that the moons’ bulk composition is different from Mars itself.

Two main origin scenarios are debated:

Mars-impact origin: The moons may have formed from debris after a giant impact on Mars, with carbon-rich material added later by interplanetary dust particles (IDPs). These IDPs are rich in carbon and are delivered in much higher flux to Mars and its moons than to Earth, so Phobos and Deimos have accumulated significant carbon-rich surface layers over time NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS).

Captured asteroids: They could be small asteroids from the outer solar system that were captured by Mars’s gravity, bringing their carbon-rich compositions with them.

In either case, the surface of both moons is coated with carbon-rich regolith from IDP infall, which explains their dark color and spectral signature. The carbon is chemically bound in minerals and organic compounds, not as pure elemental carbon.

In summary: Phobos and Deimos do contain carbon, primarily in the form of carbonaceous minerals and organic compounds, with much of the carbon delivered to their surfaces by interplanetary dust over time NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS). Wikipedia

Until informed otherwise I am going to go with a "Yes" for Carbon.

So, if you sent machines to Mars from the Earth/Moon that consisted of a nuclear fission reactor and used Lithium propellants to get to the Moon, the machine might also include, an oven to heat Carbon bearing regolith, which I expect would produce CO2.  The CO2 could probably be cooled, compressed, and condensed.  At some time to be processed to product CO and O2 as propellants.

Query: "Can a rocket engine burn a mix of Carbon Monoxide and Methane with Oxygen?"

Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
Combustion of CO and Methane with Oxygen in Rocket Engines
Yes — a rocket engine can burn a mixture of carbon monoxide (CO) and methane (CH₄) with oxygen (LOX), but the performance and practicality depend on how the two fuels are combined and the operating conditions.

1. CO/O₂ combustion
Carbon monoxide burns readily with liquid oxygen. NASA experiments have shown that CO and LOX can ignite and sustain steady combustion in rocket engine simulations, with ignition boundaries determined for various inlet temperatures NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS). The specific impulse (Isp) for LOX/CO is relatively low — around 200–290 depending on chamber pressure Space Exploration Stack Exchange — compared to LOX/CH₄ (~299 Isp) Space Exploration Stack Exchange. This means CO/O₂ offers less thrust efficiency per unit of propellant mass.

2. Methane/O₂ combustion
Methane is a well‑tested rocket fuel with LOX, producing high Isp and good stability. It is commonly used in engines like SpaceX’s Raptor.

3. Combining CO and CH₄ with O₂
If you mix CO and CH₄ before injecting into an LOX engine, the mixture will combust, but the performance will be intermediate between the two pure fuel cases. The exact Isp and combustion stability depend on the mole ratio of CO to CH₄, the oxygen enrichment level, and the chamber pressure.

Advantages: CO can be produced in situ from CO₂ (e.g., on Mars via photochemical reduction) without consuming water, unlike the Sabatier reaction for methane Space Exploration Stack Exchange.

Disadvantages: CO has lower energy density than CH₄, so adding it reduces overall Isp unless compensated by higher oxygen enrichment or staged combustion.

Ignition: Both CO and CH₄ ignite with LOX, so a mixture should ignite if the overall mixture ratio is within the LOX/CO ignition range and the CH₄ content is not so high as to shift the mixture outside the LOX/CH₄ range.

4. Practical considerations

Storage: CO liquefies at about -191.5°C, colder than LOX (-183°C), so LOX tanks would need to be insulated to prevent CO from freezing Space Exploration Stack Exchange.

Engine design: Mixing CO and CH₄ in the feed system requires careful control to avoid local fuel-rich or fuel-lean zones.

Mission use: On Mars, CO could be used as a supplement or primary fuel if water is scarce, but for high‑performance missions, LOX/CH₄ remains the preferred choice.

Conclusion
A rocket engine can burn a mix of CO and CH₄ with LOX, but the performance will be lower than pure LOX/CH₄ unless the mixture is optimized for LOX/CO combustion. For in‑situ propellant production on Mars, CO could be a viable alternative or supplement, but it will require careful engineering to match the performance and storage needs of conventional LOX/CH₄ systems

So, this possibly eliminates much of the Oxygen you have to lift from Mars to get back to Earth, and there could be two choices.  Either bring some Methane and burn it with CO, or bring Hydrogen up and use it to produce Methane from the CO.

I think the part were you can fly nuclear reactors to the proximity of the two moons, and the process the raw materials of the moons makes this vary attractive.

Ending Pending smile

#18 Re: Terraformation » AquaWorlds (Water Holding and Water Transporting Methods) » 2026-07-10 18:37:56

Quote:

So, from my point of view we want all three options for Mars: IfZqon4.png

So a great hope is that a Moon mass driver system will support the building of data centers in space.  If they do, then it would be a small project to divert a portion of the mass launchable by the Mass Drivers to send things to Mars orbits.

For instance, robots with nuclear fission electric drive, might use metal propellants to move loads to Mars.  The Lunar metals would make propellants.  I know of 3 types at this time.
1) Heuman Drive.
2) Magdrive
3) NASA's Lithium propellant system. https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasa-fire … s-to-mars/

Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
NASA’s Lithium Plasma Drive — A Breakthrough for Mars Missions
NASA has successfully tested a lithium-fed magnetoplasmadynamic (MPD) thruster at its Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) that could revolutionize deep-space travel, especially for crewed missions to Mars NASA+1.

What It Is
The lithium plasma drive is an electric propulsion system that uses lithium metal vapor as fuel. Inside the thruster, intense electric currents interact with magnetic fields to electromagnetically accelerate the lithium plasma to high speeds, producing thrust NASA+1. This is different from traditional chemical rockets, which deliver high thrust in short bursts, and from most current electric thrusters, which use solar power to ionize propellants like xenon.

Record-Breaking Test
On February 24, 2026, engineers ignited the prototype at 120 kilowatts of power — the highest level ever achieved by an electric propulsion system in the United States NASA+1. This is about 25 times more powerful than NASA’s current most advanced thrusters, such as those on the Psyche spacecraft Phys.org. The test ran for five ignition cycles, with the central tungsten electrode glowing white-hot at over 5,000°F (2,800°C) NASA+1.

Why It Matters
Efficiency: Electric propulsion uses up to 90% less propellant than chemical rockets NASA+1.

Speed & Range: Continuous, low-thrust operation over long periods can accelerate spacecraft to much higher speeds, reducing travel time to Mars and enabling missions farther into the solar system NASA+1.

Mars Readiness: NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman linked the test to progress toward sending an American astronaut to Mars NASA+1.

Long-Term Potential: The technology, researched since the 1960s, could also power robotic missions across the solar system The Daily Galaxy.

Next Steps
The data from this test will guide further development, including scaling up power levels, improving stability, and integrating the thruster into a nuclear electric propulsion system for even greater performance NASA+1. If successful, such drives could make Mars missions faster, cheaper, and more sustainable.

In short: NASA’s lithium plasma drive is a high-power, metal-vapor electric thruster that could dramatically shorten travel times to Mars and open new possibilities for deep-space exploration.

Sadly, it does not appear that the Moon will be an easy place to get Lithium from.  But the Moon may be able to supply some reactor parts, and some spacecraft parts.

Neumann Drive can use most substances on the periodic table, so perhaps NASA may be able to make a version that uses something other than Lithium.

But I feel that the beauty of this is that a Nuclear-Electric Reactor with thrust methods could move itself from Earth orbit to Mars orbits using Ballistic Capture.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballistic_capture
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1410.8856  (Earth>Mars)
Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
Ballistic Capture in Spaceflight
Ballistic capture is a low-energy orbital transfer technique in astrodynamics that allows a spacecraft to be temporarily captured into orbit around a distant planet or moon without using propellant for the insertion burn Wikipedia+1. It relies entirely on gravitational perturbations from the departure body, target body, and a third body (often the Sun) to transition the spacecraft from a hyperbolic trajectory to an elliptical orbit grokipedia.com.

How It Works
The spacecraft is placed on a trajectory ahead of the target’s orbital path in a region called the weak stability boundary (WSB) Wikipedia.

This WSB is a complex, fractal-like region in the planar elliptic restricted three-body problem, where the gravitational influences of the departure and target bodies balance with the third body’s gravity grokipedia.com.

The spacecraft “falls” into the target’s gravity well, becoming captured, and may require only minor low-power corrections (e.g., ion thrusters) to stabilize Wikipedia.

Key Advantages
Propellant savings: Can reduce capture Δv by 18–25% compared to a Hohmann transfer grokipedia.com.

No time-critical burn: Launch windows are not limited to narrow alignment periods, allowing almost any launch time Wikipedia+1.

Safer: Avoids high-speed, high-risk insertion burns.

Higher payload capacity: Less fuel means more mass for instruments or cargo grokipedia.com.

Limitations
Longer transfer times: Can take months to years instead of months for Hohmann transfers Wikipedia+1.

Precise targeting: Requires accurate injection into the WSB using stable manifolds in phase space grokipedia.com.

Temporary capture: The orbit is often unstable and may require further maneuvers to become permanent arXiv.org.

Historical Examples
Hiten (Japan, 1991): First demonstration of ballistic capture to the Moon, using an exterior ballistic capture transfer beyond the Earth–Moon distance Wikipedia+1.

SMART-1 (ESA, 2004): Used an interior ballistic capture transfer within the Earth–Moon distance Wikipedia.

GRAIL (NASA, 2011): Applied the same lunar capture method arXiv.org.

Earth–Mars proposals: 2014 studies suggested ballistic capture could reduce Mars capture Δv and extend launch windows arXiv.org.
Applications
Ballistic capture is being considered for:

Lunar and planetary orbital insertions

Sample return missions

Missions to asteroids and outer planets

Hybrid trajectories with low-thrust propulsion to further reduce energy grokipedia.com.

In short, ballistic capture is a powerful, flexible, and fuel-efficient method for reaching and orbiting distant celestial bodies, though it demands careful planning and longer mission durations.

So, the reactors could enter Mars orbits without heat shields or landing and perhaps serve as tugs but would not return to Earth.

Ideally, they could be involved in extracting materials from the moons of Mars, some of that for propellants.

These substances can easily be metals, silicon, perhaps Carbon, and Oxygen.

If we might think that a tanker could bring Methane to orbit then that or it's Hydrogen could be reacted with the materials of Phobos, either by pyrolysis or biomining.  This would produce water, and that could be split and the Hydrogen used again to extract more Oxygen, and to reduce the Iron in the materials.

I might wonder how well an Alice propulsion might work in orbits of Mars?  Nano-Aluminum and Water Ice.

If there is Carbon in the materials of the moons, then we could think to have a CO and O2 rocket method.  That might be improved if a pinch of Methane could be added to it.  Presumably the Methane from Mars.

The use of a paste of LOX and Nano-Aluminum has ben considered for the Moon.  Perhaps it could have value here as well.

So, you see the situation.  Someone put two small propellant tanks in orbit of Mars.  Tapping them would greatly reduce the drain on resources on the surface of Mars, to return ships to Earth/Moon and to expand into the Asteroid Belts.

Ending Pending smile

#19 Re: Terraformation » AquaWorlds (Water Holding and Water Transporting Methods) » 2026-07-10 09:20:39

So, from my point of view we want all three options for Mars: IfZqon4.png

I have done a lot with ice covered reservoirs in the past, so I will expand on that corner of the triangle now.

https://www.space.com/mars-water-ice-eq … ozen-ocean
Image Quote: EqtMyZH5SN8CxNSuVwJQ75-1200-80.jpg.webp

On the horizontal "Distance" measurement, there are two depressions that are interesting.  One at about 550 km and the other at about 950 km. 

950 might be a little more promising.  In places it looks like the regolith thickness may only be about 100 meters thick.

This is actually ideal.  The regolith layer may serve as a moderator and with care it might be possible to do a gradual melting, resulting in water percolating up through the regolith.

So, if the melting can be kept as long as several centuries, a way of life could be established and maintained, until it became possible to bring water down from the polar ice caps, (Probably the South Pole).

Perhaps two lakes established, A material needed for the surfaces to reduce sublimation.

Two means of melting would be heat injected, and/or salt brine injected.

A method to inject heat would be to heat brine and push it down a well, to then melt/dissolve ice deposits.  The layer of regolith will hold the ice deposits down but not prevent water seepage upwards through the regolith.

Water exposed will sublimate and freeze as well.  Then as the ice layer expands put down some poly sheets to be vapor barriers and put something like Vermiculite on top of it.  Pumice might do well.

https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/p … ting-rocks
Quote:

Scientists Have Figured Out How Floating Islands Work
Spongy rocks don’t exactly act like sponges.
by Kelsey Kennedy
May 26, 2017

Quote:

Pumice rafts
There are islands in the ocean that don’t show up on any map and that no one will also ever set foot on. Known as pumice rafts, these “islands” are made of volcanic rocks, and instead of being anchored to the seafloor they float wherever the currents take them.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-OOYzYG_Nz0
Quote:

The Rock That Floats – Inside Pumice Formation

A question is, can microwave energy from space be beamed into such a covered water pocket?  If it does not directly melt ice, and it can pass though poly-film and pumice, I would guess the answer is yes.

But you also could have nuclear power plants in the water under the covered ice.

It is one of those strange things that people could speculate on putting reactors and lighting into the ocean of Europa, but they get stuck on the idea of doing it on Mars.

Granted windows can be nice, but nuclear is much more reliable.

The expectation might be that the volume of ice would evaporate over time.  I hope it could be prolonged to a few centuries.  It is the volume of the Red Sea, I believe.

Some evaporated water will go into the atmosphere and be split into H2 and O2, with the O2 more accumulating and the H2 going into space.  But most of the evaporation will end up at the poles.

So, I feel that a lot of agriculture could occur in these waters with artificial light and chemicals.

The Polar Caps can be made into robot cities where massive manufacturing could occur.

Orbital Mars would be where propellants are provided both for returns to Earth and to move outward into the asteroid belts.

Ba5Kyyr.png

PwxzmIL.png

Generally, the idea is water provides pressurization, thermal moderation, and radiation protection.  It is hoped that it could support some sort of agriculture based on artificial lights, or fiber optic light, or chemicals, or combinations of things.

Ending Pending smile

#20 Re: Science, Technology, and Astronomy » Humanoid and other robots. » 2026-07-09 23:35:26

More robotic farm machines: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … &FORM=VIRE  Quote: 

This New American Farming Invention Is Making the Entire World Tremble

I think the fruit-Apple picker amazed me the most.

https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … &FORM=VIRE  Quote:

The Robots Are Here: Tevel & Kubota Showcase the Future of Fruit Harvesting
YouTube
Tevel
19.1K views


A commenter mentioned EMP devices.  Yes I hope these can be made resistant or easily repairable.

Ending Pending smile

I think that large portions of marginal land might be made into agrivoltaic with short fruit trees, and such harvesters could harvest fruit from them.  Of course, bears and perhaps some other animals might damage the solar panels and trees to get the fruit, so that might be a problem.

Utube, Harvesting the Future Tevel's Revolutionary Fruit Picking Robots, Mar, 30, 2023
https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … &FORM=VIRE  Quote:

Harvesting the Future: Tevel's Revolutionary Fruit-Picking Robots
YouTube
Tevel
17.1K views
Mar 30, 2023
Key moments in this video

Ending Pending smile

#21 Re: Terraformation » AquaWorlds (Water Holding and Water Transporting Methods) » 2026-07-09 15:45:16

Reviewing radiation protection again: ".How Much regolith is needed for radiation protection on the Moon?"
Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
Regolith Requirements for Lunar Radiation Protection
For long‑term lunar habitation, lunar regolith is the most practical radiation shield because it’s abundant in place and avoids the high cost of launching shielding from Earth ResearchGate. The amount needed depends on the target radiation dose, regolith density, and the type of radiation (Galactic Cosmic Rays vs. Solar Particle Events).

Typical thicknesses and doses

Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCRs): At least 2m of regolith is needed to reduce exposure to about 150mSv per 180‑day mission. Increasing to 3m reduces this to roughly 100mSv ResearchGate.

Solar Particle Events (SEPs): Regolith is highly effective at stopping SEPs; even 1–2m can significantly reduce dose, with effectiveness increasing with depth ResearchGate.

Optimal depth: NASA simulations show a peak in secondary radiation between 1.0–1.5m, so 2–3m is often used to balance GCR and secondary radiation effects ResearchGate.

Mass estimates

Loose surface regolith has a density of about 1.5–1.8g/cm³ agentcalc.com.

For a 2m layer over 1m²:

Volume = 2m × 1m² = 2m³

Mass ≈ 2m³ × 1.6g/cm³ × 10⁶ cm³/m³ = 3.2tonnes per square meter.

For a 3m layer: ≈ 4.8tonnes/m².
These figures scale with habitat area — a 100m² habitat with 2m regolith shielding would require ~320tonnes of regolith.

Engineering considerations

Compression: Compressing regolith increases density and reduces required thickness, improving both radiation and thermal insulation MDPI.

Mixed materials: Combining regolith with polyethylene or aluminum can improve GCR shielding efficiency ResearchGate.

Secondary radiation: Deeper layers reduce GCR dose but can increase secondary particle production; 2–3m is a common compromise ResearchGate.

Construction logistics: Excavating and placing regolith over large areas requires significant robotic excavation, power, and time agentcalc.com.

Summary table

Regolith thickness    Approx. GCR dose (180d)    Mass per m² (loose)   
Notes

1.0m    ~200–250mSv    1.6tonnes   
Good for SEPs, less for GCRs

2.0m    ~150mSv    3.2tonnes   
Common target for GCR/SEP

3.0m    ~100mSv    4.8tonnes   
Best for GCR, more mass

Bottom line: For a safe long‑term lunar base, 2–3m of regolith is a practical shielding depth, requiring ~3–5 tonnes per square meter of loose material. Compression can reduce this mass, but excavation and placement remain major engineering challenges ResearchGate+1.

Query: ".How much water is needed for radiation protection on the Moon?"
Quote: Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
Water Requirements for Radiation Protection on the Moon
On the Moon, there is no atmosphere or magnetic field to shield against space radiation, so lunar regolith (soil) is the primary shielding material. Water can be incorporated into regolith to improve its radiation shielding effectiveness.

1. Water’s role in shielding
Water is effective at absorbing ionizing radiation, especially secondary neutrons produced when high-energy particles strike regolith. Adding water to regolith can increase its shielding efficiency. NASA and other studies found that adding about 2wt% water to regolith particles can improve shielding by roughly 6% NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)+1. This is because water has a high hydrogen content, which is excellent for slowing down and absorbing neutrons.

2. How much water is needed
The exact amount depends on the target radiation dose reduction and the baseline shielding. For example:

A two‑meter regolith layer is sufficient for background radiation, but more is needed for major solar particle events lunarpedia.org.

If you want to enhance regolith shielding, 2wt% water (about 20g of water per kilogram of regolith) is a practical starting point for modest improvements NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)+1.

For larger dose reductions, higher water content or thicker regolith layers may be required, but water content is limited by the natural water content of the regolith (LCROSS found up to ~5.6wt% in some areas) NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS).

3. Practical considerations

In-situ water: If water is already present in the regolith (e.g., in permanently shadowed polar craters), it can be used directly.

Ex-situ water: If not available, water must be brought from Earth or produced via in-situ resource utilization (e.g., electrolysis of water ice).

Structural integration: Water can be mixed into regolith during construction or stored in water-rich regolith layers within habitat walls.

4. Summary
For modest radiation shielding improvements, adding ~2wt% water to regolith can boost protection by ~6% NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)+1. For full protection, a 2m regolith layer is the baseline, with water content optimized to enhance neutron shielding. The total water mass needed depends on the habitat size and desired dose reduction, but even small percentages can make a significant difference in long-term lunar habitation safety.

So, I was aiming for pure water, but I guess a mix is interesting.
I have wanted to simplify a survival method to less than a Stanford Torus.  So, I have this: MtzIr9F.png

So, in this diagram you might have 6 Special Starship shells joined together.

Water is the starting radiation protection and as you might build a "Cookie Jar" around it you might remove the water and use more of the space.

I have suggested:
-Asphalt
-Iron/Steel Encapsulated Stones.
-Sintered Blocks linked by Iron or Steel Fixtures.
-Encapsulated Regolith joined by fixtures of some kind.

These then to make the "Cookie Jars", perhaps.

Yes, it would be wonderful to have a Starford Torus, but you have to start with more basic methods long before you could build up to do a Starford Torus.

Ending Pending smile

#22 Re: Not So Free Chat » Heatlth Extension/Life Extension, on Earth or for Space » 2026-07-09 15:18:24

So, the long term wish is to turn back 75%, but it seems that is quite a way off.

But apparently, they are having success with Eyes, and have hopes of liver and lungs and more some time off if all goes well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m4umwimC2gg
Quote:

Dr. David Sinclair: The First Human Trial of an Age-Reversal Therapy #podcast #lifespan #longevity


James Altucher

So, the main idea is that by using 3 of 4 Yamanaka Factors and similar treatments by drugs, they seem to be able to do some age reversals in certain animals, and they are going to start testing on humans for eyes that are going to go blind anyway from Glaucoma.  Apparently the treatment works well in mice and primates?

Ending Pending smile

If I understand this, your epigenetics which give permissions on what genes a cell can act on become distorted over time and so cause aging and ill health.  These treatments are thought to allow the epigenetics' to be reset to a younger age.

So, a brain liver cell that has gotten confused as to what type of cell it should be is reinstructed to be a liver cell.

Ending Pending smile

#23 Re: Terraformation » AquaWorlds (Water Holding and Water Transporting Methods) » 2026-07-09 07:42:56

I think here so that readers will understand that my intentions with Mars/Phobo/Deimos are a pathway to vast amounts of water and other resources that are easiest found in the asteroids belts, the best way to think of why my various posts are tied to together, is that these worlds can be considered raw materials, and intentions are to refine them into useful materials.

An example of this would be to land Starship onto Mars and cook up propellants for it from CO2 and water.  The moons of Mars may have chemistry that is similar to some types of asteroids.  So, from a certain point of view, they are like having a petroleum reserve to tap on Earth.

Among greater concerns with these raw materials are to construct structures and propellants.

I feel that China has come up with something of great interest: Utube, China's New Ammonia Powered Engine Has Big Oil In Panic, 1h ago
https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … &FORM=VIRE  Quote:

China's New Ammonia Powered Engine Has Big Oil In Panic

Such a motor might be of interest on Mars, but I am thinking that in propulsion, it could make a more attractive set of engine methods of rockets, various kinds.  The Ammonia is slow burning it seems and if you split a little of the Ammonia into Nitrogen and Hydrogen, then put mix a pinch of Hydrogen into the Ammonia, the fast-burning Ammonia, serves to speed up the ignition of the Ammonia, and apparently to produce greater engine efficiency.

That could relate to a combustion process.  But I think that spiking a propellant that has a poor expansion, with a propellant that has a greater expansion rate, may be useful in a situation where you have a bulk of poor expanding propellant and only smaller amounts of greater expanding propellants.  This could matter for Nuclear-Thermal, Nuclear-Electric-Thermal, and Solar-Thermal propulsion systems.

Query: "Nuclear rocket using liquid Carbon Monoxide and Methane as propellants?"
Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
Nuclear Rocket Using Liquid CO and Methane Propellants
A nuclear rocket using liquid carbon monoxide (CO) and methane (CH₄) is a concept that blends nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) with methane–carbon monoxide–liquid oxygen (McLOx) fuel cycles. This approach is being explored for Mars ascent vehicles and other in‑situ propellant production (ISPP) applications.

Why CO + Methane?
Methane/CO mixtures are produced by Mars ISPP systems (e.g., Sabatier reaction byproducts) and can be used directly without costly separation Archive.

CO increases propellant density compared to pure methane, improving stage performance despite a slight drop in specific impulse (Isp) Archive.

Both CO and CH₄ are cryogenic, storable, and compatible with LOX, making them suitable for nuclear thermal engines.

Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) Basics
In NTP, a nuclear reactor heats a propellant (like liquid hydrogen or liquid methane) to very high temperatures before it expands through a nozzle.

This method can achieve Isp values above 900 s in vacuum, far exceeding chemical rockets (~300–450 s) newspaceeconomy.ca.

For McLOx, the reactor heats the CO/CH₄/LOX mixture, which is then expanded for thrust.
McLOx Advantages
Higher propellant density than pure methane or LOX, reducing tank volume and mass Archive.

Simpler ISPP — no need to purify methane from CO mixtures Archive.

Common storage temperature for CO, CH₄, and LOX allows lightweight, compact tanks Archive.

Potential for reprocessing organic waste from lunar or ISS operations Archive.

Performance Considerations
Isp: McLOx NTP could exceed 370 s in vacuum, with density benefits improving stage performance Archive.

Thrust: Depends on reactor power and propellant flow rate; NTP systems can deliver high, sustained thrust.

Efficiency: Higher Isp means less propellant mass for a given mission, but reactor mass and shielding add complexity.

Applications
Mars ascent vehicles using ISPP‑produced CO/CH₄ mixtures.

Lunar surface operations with waste‑derived propellants.

Future ISPP‑enabled missions where propellant production is done in‑situ.

Challenges
Reactor integration with cryogenic CO/CH₄/LOX handling.

Material compatibility at high temperatures.

Radiation shielding and safety for crewed missions.

Testing infrastructure for nuclear‑powered liquid propellant engines.

In summary: A nuclear rocket using liquid CO and methane is a promising hybrid concept that leverages in‑situ propellant production, high propellant density, and nuclear thermal efficiency for deep‑space and planetary surface missions Archive.

So, that looks like a conditional yes.

So, you might "Spike" a poor propellant with small quantities of a better propellant to to get good results.  The CO is dense and the Methane is perhaps more expandable with temperature.

Other options I am interested in are water and Hydrogen or Methane.  Can you inject a highly expansive substance into a substance like water and push it out of a thermal or plasma system?

My logic here is that if you have a Nuclear device that got you to Mars, then you don't have to cook up that much Methane for it.  (Hydrogen is probably impractical).

Bulk Materials like CO2 and H20 can be lifted.  If you have a chemical with Hydrogen in it that will be the easiest to pull Hydrogen out of you could spike water-thermal, CO-thermal, and maybe even CO2-thermal and put it though thermal or plasma thrusters.

You then only have to cook up enough LOX and CH4 to bring water and/or CO2 to orbit.

And then if you can involve the materials of the moons of Mars, you may be able to reduce the total amount you must lift from Mars.

We think that there may be Carbon available.  Some people even think Hydrogen in the form of water ice or Hydrated Minerals may be available.  We know that Oxygen and Iron are available.  At a minimum that is a lot.

If you could get Oxygen and Iron from these materials, then all you would have to lift to orbit would be Methane, and you could produce Water, CO, and CO2.  You also could lift some Ammonia to orbit if that is a good way to get Hydrogen to spike a thermal or plasma thrust method.

I mentioned Iron, not the best, but it could work in a Neumann Drive or a Magdrive.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Now I have ideas about Iron encapsulation of materials from Phobos and Deimos.

The materials of Phobos and Demos may be from several sources, and so, if you sort them by size, you might find variable chemestries.

So, if you sort by size you might have
1) Dust and small gravel.
2) Small rocks that you could incorporate into asphalt structures if you have a bitumen or Tar-Like substance.
3) Cobbles.
4) Things too big to use.

So, I have already entertained a method to encapsulate Cobbles into "Chicken Wire" Enclosures.  If you have Iron and Carbon and maybe a few other ingredients you might do this.

And at the beginning this might be a thing to risk.  The risk is if the stones get out of their encapsulation, and created a set of collision hazards.  So, at first this might be worth risking.  But later better practices may be wanted.

This is of course to create "Cookie Jars" as the outer defense of machinery protected internally by the "Cookie Jars".

This site has many good ideas: https://www.youtube.com/@Anthrofuturism
1) Heating a substance can release Volatiles, including some Oxygen.
2) Iron will sublimate and condense at lower temperatures in a Vacuum.

Where Iron and Steel are at risk of rusting on Mars, in the orbit of Mars, this concern might be very low.

Could a Iron or Steel foil be manufactured?  If so, then one path would be to wrap each cobble in Iron or Steel foil, and to press them together in a vacuum, to vacuum weld them to each other.

Query: "Iron Foil or Steel Foil?"
Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
Iron Foil vs Steel Foil
Iron foil and steel foil are both ultra-thin metal foils, but they differ in composition, properties, and typical applications.

Composition and Purity
Iron foil: Made from high-purity iron (99.5%–99.99% Fe) Goodfellow. It is a pure elemental metal, not an alloy, which gives it excellent magnetic properties.

Steel foil: Made from an alloy of iron and carbon (and sometimes other elements like chromium, nickel, etc.) www.astmsteel.com. Steel’s alloying improves strength, hardness, and corrosion resistance compared to pure iron.

Thickness and Form
Both can be made in very thin gauges (down to ~0.0005 mm for iron foil Goodfellow), but steel foil can be produced in a wider range of alloys and thicknesses, including ultra-thin precision foils for electronics Hamilton Precision Metals.

Iron foil is often supplied in light-tight, pinhole-free forms for sensitive applications Goodfellow.

Key Properties
Iron foil:

High magnetic permeability and low coercivity — ideal for magnetic shielding and electromagnetic devices Goodfellow.

High ductility and formability for thin fabrication.

Moderate electrical and thermal conductivity.

Used in transformers, inductors, magnetic yokes, particle accelerators, and as a substrate for material growth Goodfellow.

Steel foil:

Combines iron’s base properties with alloy-enhanced strength, hardness, and corrosion resistance.

Can be tailored for specific applications like strain gauges, precision resistors, medical devices, and aerospace components Hamilton Precision Metals.

Thicker steel foils may be used for structural or shielding roles, but ultra-thin steel foils are common in electronics and sensors.

Applications
Iron foil: Magnetic shielding, electromagnetic devices, scientific instrumentation, energy systems, and as a substrate for advanced materials Goodfellow.

Steel foil: Electronics (strain gauges, resistors), medical devices, aerospace, automotive sensors, and decorative or protective foils Hamilton Precision Metals+1.

Choosing Between Them
Choose iron foil if your application requires maximum magnetic performance and you can tolerate its lower strength and corrosion resistance.

Choose steel foil if you need strength, durability, and corrosion resistance in a thin form, or if you require alloy-specific properties (e.g., stainless steel for corrosion resistance).

In short, iron foil is the pure, magnetic specialist, while steel foil is the versatile, alloy-enhanced option for a broader range of engineering and industrial uses.

So, I would be my preference that the foils will be as greatly magnetized as is possible.  This may cause some trouble for some scientific equipment, but maybe that can be kept separated.

So, raising the temperature of the foil above the curie point of Iron and then allowing cooling in an induced magnetic field may do the trick.  But if the temperatures are too high for too long, the Iron may sublimate into the vacuum of space.

An AC Magnetic process may induce heat into the foils, and then a DC field may be applied as the cooling process is allowed.  I presume that vacuum welding will occur.

A wrapping of chicken wire will probably be desirable anyway.  If iron flakes off or stones drift away, there are pretty good chances that they will flock to the most magnetic field that is present.  Such a magnetic field might even have protective properties as per some kinds of radiation hazards.  The cobbles will be protective.

An parallel or alternate way to do this might be to electroplate Iron onto a collection of cobbles that are held together with Chicken Wire.

A "Cookie Jar" made of Iron Glued Cobbles (Encapsulated), may shed heat in a manner different than something that does not have the similar porosity.

So, then tricks and tactics developed, at Deimos/Phobos/Mars, may serve well in the asteroid belt and beyond.

Ending Pending smile

From post #16, substitute Asphalt for Iron glued Cobbles:

o get started humble beginnings are likely: Q8WvQBw.png

Ending Pending smile

#24 Re: Science, Technology, and Astronomy » Humanoid and other robots. » 2026-07-09 00:07:42

I think that (th) will like this material: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … &FORM=VIRE  Quote:

The United States Shocks the World with its New and Colossal Agricultural Machine
YouTube
Future Core
23 views

I think that humanoid robots of a high sophistication are going to take some time to perfect, (But be well worth the trouble).

But here we have really the example of robot devices of other kinds, doing the work that is very unpleasant, and also reducing the dangers of agricultural practices.  And I expect that these machines will get better and better at quality results.

I would expect that what can come next is robotics for Agri solar farms.

Really a pleasing set of results.

Ending Pending smile

#25 Re: Terraformation » AquaWorlds (Water Holding and Water Transporting Methods) » 2026-07-08 14:50:32

(th) Thanks for your enthusiasm towards the Stanford Torus.  It is probably true that it is going to be hard to achieve such a thing but it is a worth goal to seek after, I feel.  https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 66#p240166

I am now going to investigate if it would ever be practical to build things out of asphalt in orbit of Mars, on Mars, or in the Asteroid Belt.
If it turns out that the moons of Mars may have Carbon, they also have aggregate. 

I admit that in a vacuum or possibly on the surface of Mars, Bitumen or Tar may tend to dry out, through a sublimation process.  Colder is better I expect, but the structures built may have a limited lifetime unless some special tricks are discovered.

OK, I am cherry picking to my liking: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a … 3918305646
Quote:

Investigation of the Radiation Shielding Capacity of Asphalt and Sand for Fast Neutron Sources

Abstract
The internal wall of the cavity of experimental assemblies, involved with high energy fusion neutrons, can be covered by an asphalt-sand layer for radiation protection purposes. The calculations have demonstrated that asphalt has a radiation protection capability superior to that of concrete, on equivalent weight basis.

Query: "What is the average temperature for the surface of Phobos?"
Quote:

Like

Dislike
Phobos experiences extreme temperature variations, ranging from about −4°C (25°F) on the sunlit side to −112°C (−170°F) on the shadowed side.
Phobos, the larger and closer of Mars' two moons, has no atmosphere, which contributes to its dramatic temperature fluctuations between day and night
Wikipedia
Wikipedia
+1
. The sunlit side can reach temperatures comparable to a mild winter day on Earth, around −4°C (25°F), while the shadowed side plunges to −112°C (−170°F), colder than the harshest Antarctic nights
NASA
NASA
+1
. These extremes are intensified by the moon's fine regolith, which cannot retain heat, and its lack of atmospheric insulation
NASA
NASA
.
Because Phobos is tidally locked to Mars, the same side always faces the planet, but temperatures still vary significantly depending on whether a region is exposed to sunlight or in shadow
Answers
Answers
. The average surface temperature is estimated to be around 233K (−40°C)
Answers
Answers
. These conditions make the surface environment extremely challenging for potential landers or human exploration, as equipment must withstand both intense cold and rapid thermal changes.
Phobos’ small size and low gravity also mean it cannot retain heat, and its surface is heavily cratered, with features like the Stickney crater influencing local temperature variations
Wikipedia
Wikipedia
+1
. Overall, the moon’s temperature extremes are a direct result of its lack of atmosphere, small size, and proximity to the Sun, making it one of the coldest and most thermally variable bodies in the inner Solar System
Wikipedia
Wikipedia
+1
.

And that is without using a sunshield.

OK, now I imagine a Cookie Jar made primarily with asphalt.  I include metal framing,  Vapor barrier materials, and a sun-shield device for it.

To get started humble beginnings are likely: Q8WvQBw.png

If methods to create and maintain asphalt structures in space can be discovered, then it is uncertain what parts of the making can come from the moons of Mars, Mars, and from the Earth/Moon.

By putting a sunshield which may also be a solar collector as protection of asphalt structure, perhaps temperatures similar to that of the asteroid belt can be achieved.

Query: "Tar Like substances in Carbonaceous Asteroids?"
Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
Tar-Like Substances in Carbonaceous Asteroids
Carbonaceous asteroids — especially C-type asteroids and their meteorite counterparts like CI and CM chondrites — are known for their high carbon content, which includes organic compounds and water-bearing minerals. These materials can appear in forms that resemble tar or sticky organic residues when examined in detail.

Organic carbon and hydrocarbons
Carbonaceous asteroids contain complex organic molecules, including hydrocarbons and aromatic compounds, which can form viscous, tar-like substances under certain conditions. These organics are thought to have formed in the early solar system and may have contributed to the carbon inventory of Earth Science Times. In meteorite samples, such organics are often found in fine-grained, carbon-rich matrices that can look dark and sticky under the microscope.

Water-bearing minerals
Many carbonaceous asteroids host hydrated silicates (e.g., phyllosilicates) and other minerals that contain bound water. When these minerals are altered by heat or water, they can release water and organic compounds, sometimes leaving behind carbonaceous residues that resemble tar Wikipedia. This is especially common in asteroids that experienced aqueous alteration on their parent bodies.

Spectral and compositional evidence
Spectroscopic studies of C-type asteroids show absorption features consistent with both carbonaceous material and water-bearing minerals. The presence of these features supports the idea that their surfaces and interiors contain volatile-rich, organically complex materials Wikipedia. In meteorites, detailed chemical analysis confirms high abundances of carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, and sulfur — elements that are key to forming organic compounds.

Why it matters
These tar-like substances are not just scientific curiosities — they are potential sources of prebiotic chemistry and may have delivered water and organic molecules to early Earth. They also represent a class of materials that could be targeted in future asteroid resource missions, though their low density and fragility make mining challenging ScienceDaily.

In summary:
Yes — carbonaceous asteroids contain tar-like organic substances in the form of hydrocarbons, aromatic compounds, and altered carbonaceous minerals. These are part of their volatile-rich, organically complex makeup and are central to their scientific and potential resource value.

Query: "Tar Like substances in Bennu and Ryugu Asteroids?"
Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
Tar-Like Substances in Bennu and Ryugu Asteroids
Recent high-resolution infrared (IR) and spectroscopic analyses of samples from the carbonaceous asteroids Bennu (OSIRIS-REx) and Ryugu (Hayabusa2) have revealed a range of complex organic and hydrated phases, including carbonate-rich regions and hydrated ammonium-magnesium-phosphorus (NH₄Mg₂P₂O₇·nH₂O) grains pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov+1. These hydrated ammonium compounds are structurally and chemically similar to certain ammonium-based organics that can form in water-rich environments and, in some cases, resemble the molecular complexity found in terrestrial “tar-like” or keratinized organic matter.

What “Tar-Like” Means in This Context
In planetary science, “tar-like” substances often refer to complex, carbon-rich, hydrogen-rich organic compounds that are insoluble in water, often containing nitrogen, oxygen, and sometimes sulfur. They can form through aqueous alteration of simpler organics in the presence of water and ammonia, and are common in carbonaceous chondrites and other primitive solar system materials.

Evidence in Bennu and Ryugu
Hydrated ammonium-magnesium-phosphorus grains: Detected in both Bennu and Ryugu samples, these are rare in meteorites and suggest localized aqueous environments rich in ammonia and phosphorus pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov+1. Such compounds can be precursors to more complex nitrogen-containing organics.

Carbonate inclusions: Found in both asteroids, these indicate past interactions with water and CO₂, which can drive organic synthesis pathways Astrobiology.

Phyllosilicate-rich matrix: Both asteroids are dominated by hydrated silicates, which can host and protect organic molecules from degradation pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

Organic matter: Bennu samples contain interstellar organic matter and pre-solar stardust, some of which may have undergone aqueous alteration to form more complex, “tar-like” organics Science Mission Directorate.
Implications
The presence of these hydrated ammonium and carbonate phases, along with the organic-rich matrix, suggests that aqueous alteration processes on the parent bodies of Bennu and Ryugu could have produced complex nitrogen- and phosphorus-bearing organics—molecular analogs to terrestrial tar-like compounds. These materials may have been delivered to early Earth and contributed to the chemical inventory that eventually led to life.

In summary: While no exact “tar” has been directly imaged, the hydrated ammonium-magnesium-phosphorus grains and other complex organics in Bennu and Ryugu samples are strong indicators of the types of aqueous-altered, nitrogen-rich organic matter that could be considered “tar-like” in a planetary chemistry sense pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov+2.


Read less

I will take that as a sort or, almost, maybe.

Bitumen and Tar are not the same, but I will chase Bitumen around now.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitumen
Quote:

Bitumen (UK: /ˈbɪtʃʊmɪn/ BIH-chuum-in, US: /bɪˈtjuːmɪn, baɪ-/ ⓘ bih-TEW-min, by-)[1] is an immensely viscous constituent of petroleum. Depending on its exact composition, it can be a sticky, black liquid or an apparently solid mass that behaves as a liquid over very large time scales. In American English, the material is commonly referred to as asphalt. Whether found in natural deposits or refined from petroleum, the substance is classed as a pitch.[2] Prior to the 20th century, the term asphaltum was in general use.[3] The word derives from the Ancient Greek word ἄσφαλτος (ásphaltos), which referred to natural bitumen or pitch. The largest natural deposit of bitumen in the world is the Pitch Lake of southwest Trinidad, which is estimated to contain 10 million tons.[4]

Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
Bitumen is a complex petroleum-derived mixture of hydrocarbons, primarily composed of asphaltenes, resins, aromatics, and saturates, with carbon and hydrogen as dominant elements.
Chemical Composition
Bitumen is primarily made up of hydrocarbons, with elemental composition typically around 80–85% carbon, 8–11% hydrogen, and smaller amounts of sulfur, nitrogen, and oxygen. Trace metals such as nickel and vanadium may also be present in natural bitumen
Wikipedia
Wikipedia
+2
. Its molecular structure is highly complex, containing thousands of different molecules, which makes complete separation and identification nearly impossible
Wikipedia
Wikipedia
.

SARA Fractionation
Bitumen’s molecules are commonly classified into four chemical families, known as SARA fractions:

Saturates: Waxy, non-polar hydrocarbons that contribute to hardness and temperature sensitivity
goldbitumen.com
goldbitumen.com
+1
.
Aromatics: Ring-shaped hydrocarbons that provide fluidity and workability, balancing the stiffness of asphaltenes
goldbitumen.com
goldbitumen.com
+1
.
Resins: Semi-solid, adhesive molecules that enhance ductility, flexibility, and bonding with aggregates
goldbitumen.com
goldbitumen.com
+1
.
Asphaltenes: High-molecular-weight, solid-like molecules responsible for bitumen’s dark color, viscosity, and structural stability
goldbitumen.com
goldbitumen.com
+1
.
These fractions interact to form a colloidal system, with asphaltenes dispersed in a maltene (resins, aromatics, and saturates) continuous phase, which explains bitumen’s viscoelastic behavior
Wikipedia
Wikipedia
+1
.
Molecular Structure and Properties
Bitumen behaves as a viscoelastic material, meaning it exhibits both solid-like and liquid-like properties depending on temperature and time scale. Its adhesive and waterproofing properties arise from the balance between rigid asphaltenes and fluid maltenes
Vedantu
Vedantu
+1
. Functional groups containing nitrogen, sulfur, and oxygen influence viscosity, oxidation resistance, and adhesion to aggregates
Vedantu
Vedantu
. Over time, oxidation can make bitumen brittle, affecting its performance in pavements
Vedantu
Vedantu
.

Natural vs. Refined Bitumen
Natural bitumen occurs in deposits such as oil sands or ancient lake beds and may contain minerals like limestone in addition to hydrocarbons
Vedantu
Vedantu
.
Refined bitumen is obtained from crude oil distillation, removing lighter fractions like gasoline and diesel, and may undergo further refining to improve grade and performance
Vedantu
Vedantu
+1
.
Applications and Chemical Relevance
The chemical composition of bitumen directly affects its performance in road construction, roofing, and industrial applications. The proportion of asphaltenes, resins, aromatics, and saturates determines viscosity, temperature susceptibility, and durability. Understanding its chemistry is essential for modifying bitumen with polymers or additives to enhance properties such as rutting resistance, water damage resistance, and longevity
goldbitumen.com
goldbitumen.com
+1
.

Query: "Durability of polyethylene in a vacuum?"
Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
Durability of Polyethylene in a Vacuum
Polyethylene (PE) is generally highly durable in vacuum environments because its non-polar, saturated carbon–carbon backbone is chemically inert and does not react with most gases, including oxygen and nitrogen sciencewatch.blog. In a vacuum, the absence of oxygen and moisture significantly reduces the risk of oxidation, hydrolysis, and environmental stress cracking (ESC), which are the main degradation pathways for PE in air sciencewatch.blog.

Why PE Performs Well in Vacuum
Chemical inertness: PE resists most acids, bases, salts, and solvents, and in a vacuum, it is not exposed to reactive gases that could cause chain scission scienceinsights.org+1.

No moisture absorption: PE’s hydrophobic nature means it does not swell or degrade from water ingress, a concern in humid or atmospheric conditions sciencewatch.blog.

Thermal stability: HDPE, in particular, maintains its mechanical properties at elevated temperatures without rapid degradation in vacuum scienceinsights.org.

Impact and abrasion resistance: PE types like HDPE and UHMWPE can withstand significant mechanical stress without fracturing scienceinsights.org.

Potential Limitations
While PE is stable in vacuum, its long-term durability still depends on:

Material type: HDPE is more rigid and thermally stable than LDPE; UHMWPE offers superior wear resistance but is less crystalline, so oxygen can penetrate more easily if exposed to air scienceinsights.org.

Temperature: At very high temperatures, even in vacuum, PE can soften or degrade if thermal stress is applied.

Surface effects: In space-like vacuum, UV radiation from sunlight (if present) can cause photo-oxidation, but in a true vacuum without UV, this is not a concern sciencewatch.blog.

Practical Applications
PE is widely used in vacuum forming and vacuum-sealed products because it:

Maintains shape and integrity under vacuum pressure dtplx.com+1.

Resists chemical attack in sealed environments.

Is recyclable and environmentally stable over long service lives dtplx.com.

In summary: In a vacuum, polyethylene’s chemical inertness, moisture resistance, and mechanical strength make it extremely durable, with minimal degradation risk. Its performance is best when combined with proper material selection (e.g., HDPE for structural parts) and temperature control.

OK, and I think that plastics that have Chlorine or Fluorine in them do even better.  I have read that Carbonaceous asteroids may have salts of these substances in them.

Probably plastic bags have to come from Earth though at the startup around Mars.

If stony material with asphalt nuggets could be put into a plastic bag, and be heated, then I think the object could be formed and cooled.  A multiple of these could be joined by some means to form "Cookie Jar" walls.

We are hoping that Phobos and Deimos have significant amounts of Carbo in them, although not everyone agrees that it is there.  Mars itself does have very significant Carbon.

Some people think that there could be water ice inside of Phobos, but if so it will likely be very hard to access.

So, perhaps a best practice would be to bring Methane up from Mars and include its Hydrogen and Carbon into a bitumen-like substance, ideally most of the Carbon would come from Phobos and Deimos.

Query: "How much of Asphalt is Bitumen?"
Quote:

Like

Dislike
Asphalt typically contains about 5% to 10% bitumen, which serves as the binding agent that holds the aggregate together and provides durability and flexibility to the pavement.
Composition of Asphalt
Aggregate: Asphalt is primarily composed of aggregates, which make up about 90% to 95% of the mixture. This includes materials like gravel, sand, and crushed stone.
Bitumen: The remaining 5% to 10% is bitumen, a viscous black substance derived from petroleum distillation. Bitumen acts as a binder, providing essential properties such as waterproofing and flexibility to the asphalt
petronaftco.com
petronaftco.com
+1
.
Importance of Bitumen Content
The percentage of bitumen in asphalt is crucial for several reasons:

Durability: Proper bitumen content enhances the longevity of the pavement, reducing the need for repairs and maintenance.
Flexibility: Bitumen allows the asphalt to remain pliable under varying temperatures, preventing cracking and deformation.
Performance: The right balance of bitumen ensures that the asphalt can withstand different traffic loads and environmental conditions
petronaftco.com
petronaftco.com
+1
.
Factors Influencing Bitumen Percentage
Several factors can influence the optimal bitumen content in asphalt mixtures, including:

Traffic Load: Heavier traffic areas may require a higher bitumen content for increased durability.
Climate Conditions: In warmer climates, more bitumen may be used to prevent softening, while colder regions may require higher content to avoid cracking.
Project Specifications: Different types of roads (e.g., highways vs. residential streets) may have varying requirements for bitumen content to achieve desired performance characteristics
petronaftco.com
petronaftco.com
+1
.
In summary, the typical bitumen content in asphalt ranges from 5% to 10%, and optimizing this percentage is essential for creating durable and effective road surfaces.

Copilot said: "Bitumen is primarily made up of hydrocarbons, with elemental composition typically around 80–85% carbon, 8–11% hydrogen, and smaller amounts of sulfur, nitrogen, and oxygen. Trace metals such as nickel and vanadium may also be present in natural bitumen"

The bitumen is a small part of asphalt, the balance being aggregate, and Hydrogen is a small part of bitumen.

So, ideally Carbon and Aggregate will come from the moons of Mars, and only Hydrogen will come from Mars.
But in the beginning, I expect that Earh/Moon will have to supply the vapor barrier method.

If this can be developed for orbits of Mars, it will likely come in handy with suitable asteroid materials.

As for Mars it might have Tar.

Query: "Oil Spil on Mars, salt dome?"
Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
Oil Spill Feature on Mars and the Hebes Mensa Salt Dome
On Mars, the “Oil Spill” is a dark, flowing feature located at the eastern collapsed side of the Hebes Mensa salt dome in Hebes Chasma oilonmars.blogspot.com. The Hebes Mensa is a large, dome-shaped structure formed by diapirism — the upward movement of salt through overlying rock layers due to its lower density Wikipedia+1. This process can create domes that trap and sometimes release fluids, including hydrocarbons.

The “Oil Spill” Feature
The official interpretation from Adams et al. (2009) suggests the dark fluid is liquid brines tinted black by dust particles martinhovland.weebly.com. However, some researchers, such as Martin Hovland, argue that the physical characteristics — including the way the fluid flows and pools — are more consistent with crude oil seeping from the collapsed salt dome oilonmars.blogspot.com. On Earth, similar seeps occur in natural oil fields, such as the McKittrick oil field in California, where crude oil and bitumen emerge from the ground oilonmars.blogspot.com.

Why Salt Domes Are Relevant
Salt domes are important in petroleum geology because they can act as traps for oil and gas. As salt rises through sediment layers, it can create cavities and faults that collect hydrocarbons diversedaily.com+1. On Mars, the Hebes Mensa salt dome may have similarly trapped and released fluids, possibly including hydrocarbons, through collapse and venting.

Earth Analogues
Natural oil seeps on Earth, especially near salt domes, often show:

Braided or braided-branch flow patterns in brines or oil oilonmars.blogspot.com.

Pools that may solidify or corrode over time.

Vents where fluid emerges and spreads.

These features are used to interpret Martian seep-like formations, even though the Martian environment is vastly different.

In summary: The “Oil Spill” on Mars is linked to the Hebes Mensa salt dome, a geological structure that may have released hydrocarbons. While some scientists see it as brine-dust, others believe it is crude oil, drawing parallels to natural seeps on Earth where salt domes are known to host oil and gas martinhovland.weebly.com+3.

Brine or Oil, should we not look for evidence of life in it?

https://martinhovland.weebly.com/mars.html
https://oilonmars.blogspot.com/
Image Quote: OilSpillGoogleMars.jpg

Ending Pending smile

  1. Index
  2. » Search
  3. » Posts by Void

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB