You are not logged in.
Here are two "Libraries" I would choose to consul.
1) https://www.youtube.com/@SpaceStartupNews/featured
2)
I appreciate your curiosity (th). But I am very disappointed in you playing a race card and making a false assertion: "who took part in the storming of the Capital".
Your manner of behavior is also very suspect as you do not seem to have the moral standing that I should expect.
I only posted my last post to establish a limit to the false shading of the truth.
By Feds. we indicate Federal forces Ice, FBI, etc. So far they are mostly targeting both citizens and non-citizens who are involved in criminal activities.
There is no crime indicated if they were from that action in the capital. I do not believe that there is any way that they would just wholesale grab people, who took part.
But if they did and these "Feds" committed a crime in doing their task, then they too would be criminals to prosecute. But you must show evidence to prosecute them in that case. If someone committed such a crime it would not mater if they had ever been at the capitol or not. What would matter is that they committed a crime.
Let me ask you a question. Me being presumed to be so called "White", if I snuck into China or Zaire without the proper permissions, should I complain if the authorities there do not give me free benefits, and imprison me or expel me from their country? Never mind that it would be a fervor if they expelled me.
Criminal activity in this state and others, in association with those who have other bad purposes, have provoked the immune system of the immune system of the United States Federal Government, by getting way too far out of hand. My response is to be respectful of the authority represented and stay out of the way.
Anyone who is interfering should understand that they are very likely going into a data base, and the cars they drive are going into a data base along with their licenses. Even blowing a whistle to interfere with Federal authority is going to put them in a bad place. Technically is is a criminal act.
There is no Black or Brown or White, There are only skin tones. Your use of the race card is a very low behavior.
It is my opinion that some entities on this web site do not know how to walk on their hind paws yet.
In any cases the forces of the Democrats party are fighting a losing battle. The still inherit the Confederacy. These are people of various skin tones who seek to create lower classes that they can exploit from a vertical position. And as always they try to attack the republic people from a horizontal position.
It is the problem of slavery once again. Bring "Slaves" in from Somalia or other places, work with them to skim money out of the system, try to buy up all the land and make common people into trash.
The European descended people of this country, particularly the Eurasian ones, did not want that going on. Even the bulk of the people of what we now call the south reject the practices of the Democrat-Confederates now.
But these devils have set up nests for themselves in high trust cultures elsewhere in the union.
I will tell you something that you can believe or not. What you have seen emerge is only the beginning. Not because I might say that, but because I do not believe that the collections of humans are random particles, rather something like software persists in them.
No, you cannot call me a raciest, whatever that is, I have a neighbor family who have darker skin tones. They have pets and children and they cause me no trouble, and I wish them no harm.
You need to regard the "George Floyd" riots different than you have been presented. That was orchestrated to burn down neighborhoods so that modern day confederates could do real estate deals at favorable prices and pry their ways into our north communities.
I will only reluctantly if it all participates in your Not So Free chat. I don't care to interact with emotional and not truth-seeking people.
Reality is self-repairing. People usually call their own corrections to themselves by their own behaviors.
If you want, I could say that I believe that from abut 1925 to 2008, the Yin was in action and now we are in a very young Yang. They being contrary to each other, you should not expect as apparently the democrat "Used to be cool" of the Hippies will get their wish to have the '60's and 70's again. We are not plantation owners and don't want to be.
You should expect more and more the correction of the last "Confederate" Saeculum. (See the Fourth Turning).
I intend to harmonize with the new correcting Saeculum. Those who do not will go down.
Ending Pending ![]()
I can accept your curiosity (th). But I am that you played a race card and also did the
I want to say that I do not regard the governor here as Minnesotan. He is not from here. And of course, the immigrants that came here and are encouraged to criminal activity are also not like us.
Of course we are capable of sin and crime, but they are not us.
As for those stupid people harassing the feds, that is what they are is misguided stupid people. I have little doubt that they are incited by criminals that have gotten control of leftist organizations to lead these people astray.
I am quite well here 30 minutes away from that place. I contracted a relative who is closer, they are OK as well.
I will be entirely happy if the Feds lower the boom. I don't want those stupid people to get hurt, but it is on them for being stupid. I guess they have a rad lesson coming.
Ending Pending ![]()
My concern is for you Spacenut. Mine only lasted 2 hours, but it was scary. Probably a blood clot, maybe from covid?
Anyway they checked everything EVRYTHING! All good. No permanent damage. But I am on B. Pressure and Colesteral plus a baby aspirin.
The mini-stroke let me know that I could malfunction at any time. Maybe good to know.
It has been a year or two. But I avoid stressful burdens and try to keep happy.
Ending Pending ![]()
This video started to disappoint me about Neumann Drive and Magdrive, but later explains that they could be given nuclear power and be sized up, and indeed may well do what we could desire.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRDSbr5Fit0
Quote:
Nuclear Reactors + Metal Thrusters: The Game-Changer for Cislunar Supply Chains
Space Startup News
He also supports lithobraking some metal scrap onto the Moon for future use.
Here is a description of the crater proposed for the lithobraking: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincar%C3%A9_(crater)
Quote:
Poincaré (crater)
So, he seems to support some concepts that I support but he proposes nuclear reactors for the metal thrusters, (Nuclear Electric).
Scaled up Nuclear Arc Thrusters that use metals as propellants.
So, I am encouraged.
Ending Pending ![]()
Here is the parent site for the video: https://www.youtube.com/@SpaceStartupNews/featured
It looks like a good resource.
Here is a more detailed video about the Neumann Drive: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFtwrP1lrJQ
Ending Pending ![]()
I have expanded the title of this topic with the phrase ", and Roller Solar".
Both a rotator platform and "Roller Solar" can probably use ganged collective actuation for collections of solar panels mounted on them.
I will reference "Roller Solar" here now, bringing materials into this topic:
https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 39#p237139
https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 48#p237148
https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 54#p237154
https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 55#p237155
Buth turntable and roller schemes provide one axis of rotation.
I feel that either could implement rows of solar panels that can have that have mutual linkages that can orient them to the sun.
A visual for that might be vertical or horizontal window blinds.
While this may give the best pose to the sun's movements in the sky, it might also allow the panels to be posed in a manner to endure weather conditions that can cause damage, by wind or hail.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Window_blind
Imagine that this is a collection of solar panels: Image Quote: ![]()
Imagine that the sun is at the left of the image. The panels would be too close together. but the concept is represented.
The primary axis of rotation is to spin horizontal with the floating island, and between vertical and horizontal for the roller.
Each presents a flat surface upon which hinged solar panels can be attached. Linkages can "Gang" these panels.
So for the primary orientation, you could have a singular method of actuation and positioning.
For the flat island, that will be an orientation of the whole structure. For a roller system the roll is the primary be a roll, which will be controlled by a single method of actuation and orientation.
The will both present a flat surface to the sun, upon which a collection of solar panels can be linked to be actuated and positioned as a collection.
To protect from wind, perhaps the solar panels can be "Locked Down" to the flat surface.
To protect from hail, perhaps an approximately vertical position would be appropriate. But that might expose the panels to damage from the wind. So, not perfect protection.
Otherwise, orientation can be according to energy concerns.
A solar panel may have a cooling pigment on its back side, and in the night might lie flat with that cooling surface exposed to the sky.
So, if you have a water reservoir, you might cool it at night and use the cooled water to cool the solar panels during the day.
Ending Pending ![]()
Returning to a concept of a in-orbit booster, I think it could be competitive with Nuclear-Thermal.
Nuclear-Thermal-Hydrogen will do much better than Hydro-Lox, we are told, to get humans to Mars more quickly. But that has to assume that
You transported huge amounts of Hydrogen from a source.to go to Mars you need it from Earth or the Moon. The Moon would have to be developed first, And then to return to Earth from Mars, you need a lot of Hydrogen from Mars. You probably will not be aerobraking into Earth's atmosphere with a nuclear fission drive.
Two things I retain from Dr. Robert Zubrin are:
1) If you have more power, rather than to take a faster trip, take more payload.
2) Use a path to Mars with a "Free-Return" option.
Humans and Cargo can be handled to some extent as separate things.
You probably want humans headed to Mars to have a "Free-Return" option. But you might prefer to add consumables to such a mission, as if you are forced to do a "Free-Return", you will need them.
Cargo in bulk could be done on ships that do not access the "Free-Return" option so they may be slower than that.
Also Cargo, might be brought to orbits of Mars using efficient electric rocket propulsions.
The "Star-Kicker" could be useful to launch a Starship that would have extra supplies to survive a 2 year "Free-Return". That ship would likely be for human transport. In such a case, the Star-Kicker may or may not be expendable.
Here is that video again that mentions "Star-Kicker": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqERiN848DY
Quote:
How SpaceX Is Solving Starship’s Moon Landing Problem
Space Zone
39.5K subscribers
In early implementation of missions to Mars, it would almost certainly be expendable and abandon to a Ghost orbit somewhere.
But depending on the existence and nature of "Water Stations". the "Star-Kicker" could be dropped off at a higher energy orbit "Water Station" somewhere. If might be refilled and then fly back to another location to be reused.
I might assert, that more than one "Star-Kicker" could be stacked. Presuming that the structure could endure the thrusting, you could have two or more "Star-Kickers", attached to a Starship. I am not sure what the mission would be to justify that but it could be an available service.
And then if you want to play games, you could convert "Star-Kickers" into drop tanks. You would have to pull the engines out of them and plumb pairs of them to mount sideways to a Starship. So, for instance three times the propellants and using the engines of the actual Starship to burn it all.
That may give access to the deep outer solar systerm, I am guessing.
Ending Pending ![]()
I have been seeing notions that electrolysis of water is becoming more practical.
This article suggests such a gain: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=le4tH9qHjrw
Quote:
Breakthrough: Hydrogen Finally Cheaper Than Gas?
German Science Guy
70.9K subscribers
It seems sensible that over time the technology will improve not get worse, as long as social structures for technology are stable.
This would support making propellants on Mars, but of course will matter in other places in space.
Of course I am thinking of "Water Stations".
A "Water Station" might have "Storm Shelters" for radiation storms, but when the supply of water stored on the "Water Station" was large, resort to such shelters might be less important.
Water tanks can double as "Farms", and if electrolysis is getting better the production of acetate and Oxygen should become more efficient.
Acetate does require Carbon of course so a "Water Station" should have some. Maybe even a lot.
So, a "Water Station" might cook up Methane also.
As for Iron Oxide, it might be stored long term, and with the other assets of a "Water Station", It should be possible to reduce the Iron Oxide with Hydrogen and either biological or heating methods. Then you could have Iron and water and then you could split the water to produce Oxygen.
The Iron can be propellant for Magdrive or Neumann Drive, or you could be able to make some types of Steel, depending on the ingredients available.
So bulk items to store at a "Water Station" might include water ,Carbon or Carbon compounds, Iron Oxide, and other smaller amounts of substances.
A "Water Station" could cook up a batch of propellants for a mission, "Just in time". "An old catch phrase).
This would avoid having large amounts of stored explosive substances that will require active cooling.
Ending Pending ![]()
The idea of a floating island well sized to a pond which could rotate to follow the sun, allowing better solar panel performance, could be hindered by winter ice.
However, moving water can melt holes in ice, on rivers and even lakes.
https://www.elitedockbubbler.com/
Quote:
Bubbler systems are effective for melting ice by transferring heat energy from the water to the ice, causing it to melt. Here are some key points about their operation:
Heat Transfer: Bubblers transfer heat energy from the warmer water at the bottom of a lake or pond to the ice cover, which helps to melt the ice.
1
Controlled Melting: These systems can reduce ice thickness, allowing ships to pass through or causing ice to break up more easily.
1
Environmental Benefits: Using bubbler systems can also improve water quality by adding dissolved oxygen, benefiting aquatic life.
1
Installation Considerations: The effectiveness of a bubbler system depends on factors like water depth, temperature, and natural ice cover characteristics.
2For more detailed information, you can refer to the sources,, and.
33 Sources
So, a pond almost entirely covered by a floating island could retain considerable heat in the water at it's bottom provided the pond were greater than 6 feet deep as I recall.
If you included a means of melting the ice by swirling that warmer water onto the water at the perimeter, of the floating island, you might be able to keep ice from gluing the island in place to the shore. A bubbler method might work.
And during the winter, you might also add heat back into the pond using solar energy.
Such a pond almost fully covered by a floating island, might engage in a simulation of the pickling process of a natural bog. So the decay rate of the floating island might be slow.
While you could rely in part on decay to insert tiny bubbles into the mesh of the floating island, it could be that burning something and then pumping the exhaust under the floating island would do rather nicely, as it would be deficient of Oxygen.
I am not sure how artificial saltwater bogs would work, but the salt might be assistive in pickling the floating island.
As I have said before you might include vapor barriers to reduce evaporation from a saltwater or brine bog, floating island.
The idea of a floating island, is then that it can rotate during the day, helping to present an array of solar panels to the sun, with one degree of mobility, and a bio-bearing.
Ending Pending ![]()
As amendment to the just prior post, I again mention two other Moon fostered methods that could perhaps be used as parallel boosters to get a spaceship off of the Moon without the boosters themselves using Metha-Lox.
1) Alice: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ALICE_%28propellant%29 If I understand how this works, nanoparticles of Aluminum mixed with ice combust, producing heat and liberating highly expanding Hydrogen. At least for now I think that is how that works.
In any case if the Moon has sufficient water and the production of Nanoparticles from Lunar regolith becomes possible then it may be that such boosters could be strapped onto a ship like a Lunar Starship, to assist it to Lunar orbit. This would reduce the consumption of liquid propellants of the Starship to get to that orbit.
While the Alice Boosters could be expended, on the other hand perhaps they could be brought to the nearest "Water Station" to be repurposed as metal products. Or they might ride back down to the Lunar surface to be refilled and reused. But I think the casings might be heavy, so that might be propellant costly. Not sure.
Here is some support for what I have said: Quote:
ALICE rockets, or Aluminum-Ice Rocket Propellant, are a promising solution for lunar missions due to their unique properties. They are a frozen mixture of nano-aluminum powder and water, which allows for easier ignition and combustion compared to traditional solid rocket propellants. This makes ALICE suitable for on-site production on the Moon, where both aluminum oxide and water are abundant resources. The high propellant density of ALICE decreases the dry mass of the rocket, making it more efficient for lunar missions. Additionally, ALICE's ability to generate hydrogen as a working fluid during combustion can enhance the thrust and efficiency of lunar missions.
Wikipedia
2) A concept which has been investigated is a paste of LOX and nano aluminum as a propellant.
It has some problems as it has to be squeezed like a toothpaste into a combustion chamber and they had to use liquid Nitrogen to keep it from burning back into the propellant tank and causing a uncontrolled fire and/or explosion.
Perhaps Liquid Oxygen could be used, in a heat exchanger to keep the burn at bay.
I am tempted to suggest modifying the Mixture to be LOX, Water Ice particles, and Nano Aluminum. This would introduce some Hydrogen to the expansion of the burn. It may improve performance and conserve water on the Moon. As it is the LOX/nano particles mix will underperform the burning of Hydrogen or Methane but may be good enough for the Moon.
Here is some material from the internet related to #2 above:
https://space.stackexchange.com/questio … ant-source
Quote:
The concept of using a paste of Liquid Oxygen and nano-Aluminum as a lunar propellant has been explored by researchers and organizations. Here are some key points regarding this approach:
Aluminum Powder in LOX: Aluminum powder can be suspended in gelled LOX to form a monopropellant, which has been tested in small rocket engines. The engine was designed to keep the LOX from boiling off and to feed the propellant into the combustion chamber using a piston.
1
Hybrid Rocket Engines: A conceptual design for a hybrid rocket engine using solid aluminum and liquid oxygen has been proposed. This design involves a hexagonal array of aluminum bars fed with LOX for regenerative cooling before reaching the flame at the bar tips.
1
Performance Challenges: Despite the potential, the performance of aluminum and oxygen propellants has been estimated, but actual combustion tests have shown lower than predicted characteristic velocity and specific impulse performance efficiencies due to poor mixing and two-phase flow effects.
1
In-Situ Propellant Production: The idea of using lunar resources for propellant production, including aluminum and LOX, is part of In Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU). This approach aims to eliminate the need for costly imports of propellants and could be a significant boost towards lunar colonization efforts.
1These developments highlight the ongoing research and exploration of using lunar resources for rocket propulsion, with a focus on sustainability and resource utilization.
6
For the Hybrid concept, I wonder if a pre-burner which would mix a smaller part of something like Paraffin to combust with a larger part of LOX could then be fed to burn the Aluminum. That would then introduce Hydrogen into the exhaust which might improve the expansion.
Or perhaps somehow water steam might be injected into the heated Oxygen to introduce Hydrogen.
That might improve the results I would hope.
Ending Pending ![]()
To me this somewhat for amusement and learning. But I think it might lead to something useful, so if the administration tolerates it I will work on this. Otherwise, we can delete it.
I have noticed that certain people in the world have created floating islands to make farms on, so that is of interest. Also, Bogs could be places where Carbon could be sequestered, from the atmosphere. Ideally such sequestration could be in association with economically gainful activities.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinampa
Quote:
Floating islands for farming are innovative solutions that utilize water bodies for agricultural purposes. These islands can be constructed using various materials and designs, such as reeds, mud, or specialized floating structures. Here are some key points about floating islands for farming:
Chinampas: These ancient Aztec floating gardens are still used today in the Valley of Mexico. They consist of small, rectangular plots built on lake beds, surrounded by canals for irrigation and drainage. Chinampas are known for their ability to grow diverse crops and support a balanced ecosystem.
3
BioHaven Floating Islands: These islands are designed for farm ponds, treatment ponds, and more. They come in various sizes and can be customized with planting pockets for aquatic or terrestrial plants. BioHaven islands are also used for waterfowl nesting and can be placed in shallow or deep water.
1
Floating Riverbanks: These can be planted with edible crops, transforming canal and river banks into floating farms. They provide inspiration and food for local populations and can be positioned next to boats, cafes, or docks.
1
Floating Walkways: These can be combined with Floating Ecosystems to create larger floating farms, allowing for easy access for planting and harvesting crops.
1Floating islands for farming offer sustainable and innovative solutions for growing crops in water bodies, supporting both agricultural production and environmental conservation.
5 Sources
This may have paths to Mars.
Also, though this may have paths to solar energy.

A floating Island might support solar collectors and farming. It might be spun on the water to assist in making the installation sun facing.
https://engineerine.com/portugals-floating-solar-farm/
Quote:
Portugal’s Floating Solar Farm: A Renewable Energy Revolution
Last Updated on March 24, 2025 by Alex Ramirez
Image Quote: 
I think that the means of floatation of floating islands is partial fermentation and the pickling of the substance of the island. The Oxygen being consumed, decay is retarded. The mass if filled with gas bubbles.
So, I am thinking that you could put new vegetation under the island periodically and perhaps bubble Nitrogen or CO2 under the island to push tiny flotation bubbles under it.
You might put woven mats on top, and maybe bamboo frames on top of that.
Then Solar panels on top of that.
You may or may not promote agriculture on top of the island, under the solar panels.
You may be able to rotate the island during the day so that the solar panels face the sun.
If you are on top of a salt water body, even hypersaline, your flotation will be enhanced, and the salt may help to pickle the biomass under the island.
Should you want to inhibit evaporation, you might put a vapor barrier under the mats that would be put on top of the islands vegetation mass.
On Mars, if you had this in a dome, your pressure could be low inside the dome and you could have hypersaline water.
OK, that opens it a bit. The island is to primarily be made of biological waste.
If you are promoting agriculture on top of it then the nightly dews will settle on the vegetation helping to water it. This most likely would be done on fresh water, but maybe some salt tolerant crop could be grown on salt water.
Ending Pending ![]()
Well, that is appreciated. In the USA, it is the first applicant that can get the patent, I think. But this having military applications, likely it would be seized for national security.
I have had a Mini-Stroke, which left no permanent damage. I am medicated for it, so hope I will not get a repeat. But I am old, and cannot deal with the stress to do a patent, or to start a business. Those things are full of sharks anyway, if anything of value exists, you can bet some shark will find a way to take it.
But this is my idea of doing volunteer work as a senior. I hope to make recompense for poor works that I may have done in my earlier life. I do not like to remember the times I did not do a good job.
It is either this or do nothing. My understanding is that God does not like a talent given to be wasted.
And I like doing it anyway. Good chances someone will do better eventually, but then I will perhaps have stimulated that occurrence.
Ending Pending ![]()
There are two things I would like to explore further:
1) In-space boosters, uniform and mixed.
2) Expendable, (Not-Really).
Star Kicker would be a Uniform Fuel in-space booster. As described, the booster is one use and then abandoned, but could be used in a Expendable (Not-Really) device.
I have mentioned "Water Stations" and implied that they would be in circular orbits for the most part, but there also could be elliptical examples.
Using Star-Kicker, it seems that a Starship may be able to after the boost be able to continue to the Moon, land, and then come back to LEO.
But as was said, the Star-Kicker would be abandoned in a space orbit for now. But its reuse would be very desirable.
Although a "Water Station" might support Hydro-Lox, it also could perhaps support Metha-Lox. I am expecting that these stations will be resupplied by some type of electric rocket propulsion. I have mentioned Argon/Xenon, Magdrive, and Neumann Drive as possible options.
As the system developed it might have substances like Water, Carbon, and Iron oxide brought to orbit from Earth and to some lesser extent the Moon (Carbon is unlikely for the Moon).
SpaceX is rumored to want to be able to build 10,000 ships a year. Well, some can be made so that upon reaching LEO+, the ship is split into an upper part which can be used as a resource in LEO+, and the "Locomotive" which is the propulsion section, which can be used as a Star Kicker.
With these substances, and perhaps a few more minor substances, the "Water Stations" could synthesize Propellants. Hydro-Lox, Metha-Lox, Iron (For Magdrive and Neumann Drive).
Where electric rockets are efficient most bulk freight would be handled by them where they can operate.
Here is that video where "Star-Kicker" is mentioned: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqERiN848DY
Pause to watch again.............
Let's imagine that Star-Kicker does not use all of its propellants, to boost a Stubby Starship. It then may use the balance of it's propellants to join with a "Water Station". That "Water Station" could be in a circular orbit or a elliptical orbit.
Maybe a circular orbit in geosynchronous, maybe an Elliptical orbit that poised between LEO+ and some higher orbit where a "Water Station" exists in a circular orbit. So, the Star-Kicker could be refilled at a "Water Station", perhaps in an elliptical orbit. When it nets near either the low end of the orbit or the high end of the orbit it may do a burn to join with a circular orbit "Water Station".
An alternative that would take longer is for an electric tug to grab it on its path and bring it to a water station.
For instance, an electric tug bringing resources (Water, Carbon, Iron Oxide, etc.) to a "Water Station" on its way back to the source of those materials might be able to grab a used "Star Kicker" and bring it to a "Water Station".
So both sections of such a ship are put to further uses. The upper portion may become part of a LEO+ Space Station, or might become salvage for other purposes such as metal propellants for Magdrive or Neumann Drive.
The "Locomotive Section" might be more reusable than an Atmospheric or Lunar Starship might be.
So this type of in-space booster is serial in deployment. It is series with the Starship.
But a Parallel booster might be possible as well.
https://www.bing.com/images/search?view … ajaxserp=0
Image Quote: 
Parallel Booster system using H2:
The Starship O2 tank would service both the CH4 and H2 combustion processes, so would need to be sized appropriately.
Two distinct uses are to land on the Moon and ascend from the Moon, and perhaps to travel from "Water Station" to "Water Station".
The H2 tanks will not be intended for long term filling. You would fill them at a "Water Station", which could be on the Moon or in an orbit.
You would immediately burn off all the H2, and then fall back on CH4 as your fuel.
So, in landing on the Moon, the H2 tanks would be empty and would serve as part of the landing gear. The landing would be done with the CH4, and O2.
The H2 tanks would be designed to absorb damage is the landing was too hard. Of course, then they could not be reused. But if the H2 tanks were in good shape then the H2 tanks could be refilled just prior to launch from the Lunar "Water Station". The Oxygen tank could also be topped off on the Moon. The early part of the launch would burn all the H2, and the rest of the launch would depend on the CH4.
The assembly arriving at an orbital "Water Station" could be refilled with H2, CH4, and O2 as desired.
If needed or desired, after H2 is consumed, the parallel booster could be dropped off of the Starship to reduce dry mass, and perhaps then eventually a electric rocket system would grab it and bring it to a "Water Station.
So, I am sure there are other options that could be developed as well.
Some attention needs to be given to the possibility of material spills. If water, it will evaporate. If solid Carbon, it might become a set of collision hazards. Similar for Iron Oxide. So, size matters. I am not sure what is the best for size of Carbon and Iron Oxide pieces. I think it might be useful to add some magnetic materials to each part and magnetized them. Then a spill of solid parts, might clump together if the spill was relatively passive in nature and not explosive.
Obviously setting up a segmented travel method in space will be a thing that evolves like a living thing, having a seed type start and then expand to greater options.
Ending Pending ![]()
This post depends on prior post materials.
For now, I am more equipped to formulate useful questions than to give more solid definitions of answers.
Some people will get hooked on a binary contest Hydro-Lox vs. Metha-Lox. I Don't want to get hung up on that.
Metha-Lox is a good choice for Earth<>LEO, and Mars<>Earth. It is still useful elsewhere, and perhaps even materially supported elsewhere such as Carbon from Phobos or Deimos. But for the moment I want to contemplate a "In Space Backbone based on Hydro-Lox".
So, a question is, what are the possible sources of propellants for that, and what is the relative ease of use?
For the Earth, what is the most useful method to get LOX and Hydrogen in orbital situations? The current scheme for Metha-Lox is to have extra propellants of Methane and Oxygen on "Tanker" starships.
For Blue Origin it could be a similar method involving Hydrogen and Oxygen.
But I think we rapidly get to a condition where tanks of water may be more practical, presuming you have methods to process it somewhere in orbital space. For instance, a "Water Station" in LEO, or one in "L1" or one on the surface of the Moon. I think that those are the three most interesting. And if you wanted to do "Metha-Lox" as well you could also bring a Carbon containing compound with the water. But I am seeing a "Water Economy" in orbit as being simpler, so for now I will give it a Keep It Simple Stupid. (KISS).
As "Up-Mass", from the surface of the Earth to LEO, I think water to be much easier to handle than cryogenics. I think the avoidance of explosive potential, they moderation of substance temperatures, and perhaps the volume issue may be in its favor.
For instance, if you split water into Liquid Hydrogen and Liquid Oxygen, I am not sure, but I think the two substances will take up more volume than water will. And to store or move to "L1" and store, it will be much easier to handle. You could probably store it as ice in plastic bags inside of a cargo hold, if you kept the temperatures down., for transit.
Also water in tanks could support forms of bio-productivity, and also more conveniently serve as radiation shielding.
Pause...........
In prior posts "Star-Kicker" was mentioned, and I mentioned a wraparound "Hydro-Lox" belt for Starship.
Blue Origin might do the warp around "Hydro-Lox" Belt as well.
In the use of "Star-Kicker, it is said that it would be used as a Metha-Lox booster for Starship to go to the Moon, and when empty, "Star-Kicker" would be abandoned to a orbit. Well, when we get good methods of electric propulsion, a tug could go and get it and bring it to a "Water Station".
The wrap around Hydro-Lox belt thruster could be handled in a similar fashion. Once its Hydrogen was exhausted, it could be ejected to a space orbit and then retrieved efficiently by an electric propulsion device, to a water station.
But you could also not eject it and just carry it with you from "Water Station" to "Water Station". Very flexible.
Where I have specified three "Water Stations", LEO, "L1", and Lunar Surface, we could add additional ones such as low Lunar orbit, and geosynchronous orbit. So, then a trip could be segmented even more. For a "Water Station" in low Lunar orbit, it might need low level propulsion to maintain a more constant orbit. It could use electric propulsion methods or simply have a small Hydro-Lox engine. After all it is going to have means to cook up lots of fuel and Oxygen for spaceships.
So, lets presume that the Moon does have lots of water. If we launch a Starship from the Moon with a wraparound Hydro-lox power pack, you load liquid Hydrogen into the power packs Hydrogen tank, and then also fill the Oxygen tank as full as you consider prudent. The Methane tank may have residual Methane in it. Your cargo can be water or Iron Oxide as possibilities.
You launch towards the Low Lunar "Water Station". You exhaust your Hydrogen. At this point you may eject the Hydrogen power pack, or may carry it to the Low Lunar Orbit "Water Station". You refill with fuels, perhaps top off your Oxygen. If you ejected your power pack you might receive a fresh one. The power pack you ejected can be retrieved by a robotic electric rocket and brought over to the "Water Station for reuse in the future.
You Launch again from "Low Lunar Orbit" to go to the "L1 Water Station". Rinse and Repeat..... Moon>Low Lunar Orbit>"L1">Geosynchronous> LEO, or land on Earth.
The reverse orbit for Starship would be Launch to LEO, likely using Metha-Lox and Raptors alone.> To Geosynchronous with Hydro-Lox assistance> To "L1" by similar > To Low Lunar Orbit by Similar > To the "Water Station" on the Moons surface.
Multiple segment travel is more complicated, but it allows you to greatly reduce "Dry Mass" for your propellant tanks.
And under the surface of this you would have electric rocket propulsions more efficiently moving support substances between point in the path. For instance, moving tanks of water or ice, perhaps moving electric rocket propellants.
Types of electric rocket propellants I can think of now are, "Argon/Xenon", "Metals and Carbon" (For Neumann Drive or Magdrive).
If this system were expanded beyond Earth/Moon, it may be that substances would be transferred in a similar fashion along segments of paths to various points. It could result is substances being brought to the Earth/Moon from places like Deimos/Phobos/Mars, or the asteroids.
Ending Pending ![]()
This is thinking that I like: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqERiN848DY
Stubby Starship.
TLI booster (Could also be a form of Star-Kicker)
Star-Kicker: The "Locomotive" part of a Starship. (Tanks, engines, etc, but not nose, cabin, cargo holds).
But the 2nd half of the video about satellites might get a bit boring.
In my opinion, after the original setup on the Moon, the system could evolve to include a "Water Station" at "L1".
If you have water on the Moon you might have a "Water Station" on the Moon, one at "L1" and one in association with LEO.
These "Water Stations" would store water and have extensive power systems and could cook Hydrogen and Oxygen from the water to be used in refilling ships.
It is my opinion that a Stubby Starship could have an auxiliary propulsion system which would be Hydro-Lox added in orbit.
This could be a belt of thrusters and a Hydrogen tank that would be strapped onto a Starship, around it's girth, and could be plumbed into the Oxygen tank of the Starship.
Water could be brought up the LEO "Water Station", by Starships. We hope that the Moon will have water in sufficient quantities for a "Water Station on the surface of the Moon. For the "L1" "Water Station", we might hope to deliver water to it using electric rocket systems, at least at first, and possibly from the Moon, later if it turns out to be practical.
So, the Hydro-Lox Auxiliary Power Belt, would be used as a booster option. It would be filled just before launch from LEO, "L1", or the Moon. The Hydrogen would be completely consumed as soon as possible to not have losses from boil off. The "Water Stations" would be able to support anti-boiloff systems as they are not intended to be consuming much propellants to maintain their positions.
The Starship would then operate using the Metha-Lox system. The belt could be ejected in an emergency, but it would be preferred to reuse it.
Types of Electric Rocket to bring water to the "L1" water station could be "Argon with a pinch of Xenon", or the Magdrive or Neumann Drive.
Power supplies for them could be Nuclear, Solar, or Beamed power.
Ending Pending ![]()
The "Water Stations" could service Blue Origin, Stoke Space, and others that may use Hydro-Lox.
But those may need to prevent Hydrogen boil-off curing passage to the Moon and back.
Ending Pending ![]()
Dealing with the posts of the last few days, it should be apparent that the drum has a local load, but the apparatus might also export electricity. If it has local batteries, then it may export electricity, possibly 24/7 in favorable conditions. This would use power lines most efficiently as they could be run near capacity under optimum conditions.
The ability to generate Acetate is a method of storing energy as wall, even though it is used to grow "Crops".
I suppose that if you wanted to make a "Drum House" to live in, you could but you would have to deal with its tilting during the day.
At night it could stand still.
Ending Pending ![]()
If we depart from water as a support, the drum must be enhanced in strength.
It then is a roller with a flat solar surface: 
I have not shown actuation methods, as there may be many options.
The device could be for various purposes. It can be a greenhouse, or a thermal collector/reservoir. You would need linear concentrating mirrors and perhaps windows, to do thermal collection.
But things I read suggest that the ability to split water, and CO2 are to become lower cost, and that LED's will become more efficient.
The ability to generate Acetate and Oxygen to stimulate the growth of Algae is already considered to be 4 times better than Photosynthesis, but I expect that the need for special materials like Platinum will decrease and so drop the price of the activity.
For the growth of Algae or plants could be promoted by a mixture of LED's and Chemical (Acetate + Oxygen), method. Windows may be more trouble than they are worth.
As for managing heat fluctuations, I would expect that the daytime will promote a heating inside of the drum, but a special radiative coating of the drum may help dissipate heat, especially in the nighttime. OF course, on Mars, rather than Earth the retention of heat will be more desired.
The thermal mass in the interior of the drum, including water will moderate the extremes.
You could lay the drum North to South or East to West, depending on your purposes.
Unlike bifacial solar panels, the East to West orientation of the solar panels can capture morning noon and afternoon sunlight.
While the drawing indicates a flat surface, the solar panels might have degrees of freedom on hinges to better face the sun. Solar Flaps.
Prolonged freezing conditions may provoke a danger where the water freezing might damage the drum. So, that problem needs to be handled.
IF your algae are in plastic bags then that might reduce the problems.
The air pressure inside the drums can be towards "As Desired". Probably on Earth it would be close to atmospheric at the location. On Mars the interior of the drums, may likely have increased pressure imposed on them.
If temperature can be kept from extremes, then these drums can be sealed for the most part, and the water included is likely to stay inside the structure. So, it may be that this form of activity may be quite good in desert locations.
Ending Pending ![]()
From the last post:
My idea is to make very large Shade Balls or Shade Cylinders.
Cylinders could work well for Canals in Deserts.
For Something like the Salton Sea, then whole rows of Cylinders. It can partially sun follow either North South or East West.
So, I am imagining a future world, where AI and robotics might have dropped the cost of hardware, to say 10% or 5% of what it would be now.
To help justify adding CO2 to the atmosphere, it would be useful if you could pull CO2 out of the environment and with water and some other chemicals manufacture plastic for these devices.
For instance here are some ways to extract CO2 from seawater:
https://news.mit.edu/2023/carbon-dioxid … ation-0216
Copilot Search Brandingfigure 6
Recent advancements in technology have made it possible to efficiently extract carbon dioxide (CO2) from seawater, offering a promising approach to mitigate climate change and ocean acidification.
Methods of CO2 Extraction
Electrochemical Processes: Researchers at MIT have developed a membrane-free electrochemical cell system that can effectively remove CO2 from seawater. This method involves using reactive electrodes to acidify seawater, converting dissolved bicarbonates into molecular CO2, which is then collected as a gas under vacuum. The process is cyclic, allowing for the regeneration of the seawater back to its alkaline state before being returned to the ocean, potentially reversing local ocean acidification.
1
Direct Ocean Capture (DOC): This method involves removing dissolved CO2 from seawater for carbon storage or reuse. Companies like Brineworks and Captura are leading innovations in this area. Brineworks uses electrolysis to extract CO2, claiming a cost of less than $100 per ton when operating at scale. Captura employs electrodialysis to acidify ocean water, releasing CO2, which is then captured using membranes.
2
Ebb Carbon's System: A new system developed by Ebb Carbon at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory allows seawater to absorb and store CO2 from the atmosphere. This system is designed to mitigate climate change and ocean acidification by converting CO2 into bicarbonate, a natural storage solution, without increasing acidity in the ocean.
14 Sources
Implications and Future Directions
Climate Mitigation: These technologies aim to enhance the ocean's natural ability to absorb CO2, which currently accounts for about 30-40% of human-produced emissions. By improving extraction methods, it is possible to achieve net negative emissions, which is crucial for meeting climate targets.
2
Scalability and Environmental Impact: While these methods show promise, challenges remain regarding scalability and ensuring that the processes do not harm marine ecosystems. Ongoing research is needed to quantify the effectiveness of these technologies and their impact on marine life.
1In summary, extracting CO2 from seawater is an emerging field with significant potential for addressing climate change, leveraging innovative technologies to enhance the ocean's role as a carbon sink.
3 Sources
While it might be useful to simply use fossil fuels directly both the atmosphere of Earth and Mars carries CO2. It may be convenient to simply pull the CO2 out of water when by some means CO2 has migrated into the water from the Air.
Then to manufacture Acetate and Oxygen. Then to feed what is inside of the shading device as depicted in the above diagram.
I have provided that there could be windows or artificial light so whatever grows in the device will not be totally in the dark.
Then the notion is a pathway from organic matter to making plastics (A bit of a hand wave).
And I do not mean plastics the degrade fast. Rather I want stuff that can last 1000 years ideally.
The crops inside could be algae, or duckweed, or hydrilla. Or you could have floating gardens of something.
The interior of the device will have a fair amount of thermal inertia, and will also be largely shaded by the flat surface where solar devices will be installed.
The surface area of the device is greater than the surface of the water. So, I anticipate that both natural convection and winds will largely do a net cooling with air and not evaporative cooling.
I have also allowed the possibility that these would not even float on water. But the wear and tear on that may require special measures.
Obviously on Mars, you could pressurize the interior of the devices.
And on Mars it is said that if all the CO2 in the ice caps were evaporated, the atmosphere would allow snow melts and temporary streams of water. These devices on Mars then could reduce evaporation. But, on Mars, the ponds will likely need to be cold and very salty.
In the terraform of Mars, the earliest bodies of water possible might resemble this pond in Antarctica: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Juan_Pond
Quote:
With a salinity level of 45.8%, Don Juan Pond is the saltiest of the Antarctic lakes.[1][2] This salinity causes significant freezing-point depression, allowing the pond to remain liquid even at temperatures as low as −50 °C (−58 °F).
So, it is thought that the water is too harsh for life, but inside of the Shade devices the water could be warmer and less salty.
On Earth, perhaps the great basin, water bodies largely covered in shade devices of this type, might be sustainable from local rain and snow falls.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_St … limatology
Image Quote: 
So, also depending on evaporation rates, green areas on the Map seem more likely to be able to have lakes.
But Yellows and Browns might be helped in it by these giant shade device.
So, for instance for the Great Salt Lake, if you covered half of the water with shade devices, you MIGHT cut the evaporation rate by 50%. So the lake would inflate and cover more area until its natural evaporation rate is restored. Therefore, you would not really reduce the amount of open lake available for wildlife and humans. You would reduce the salt gradient level though. In theory you could inflate the lake until it was 2x the saltiness of sea water, in which case it might be possible to grow fish in it.
But the idea is to sequester Carbon from the atmosphere while doing farming inside of the shade devices. Also producing electricity which you might use in the farming and for other things.
You might want to space these things a bit in case of fire.
Anyway, that might be how we get away with the rising CO2 levels. I hope it can be a Win/Win/Win............Situation.
Ending Pending ![]()
Maximized Shade-Balls, Shade-Cylinders.
There are only two worlds where I think this technology might have merit. Earth and Mars.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shade_ball
Image Quote: 
What I am after is a means to special environments like deserts and others. The hope is to find an alternate use for Carbon in fossil fuel reserves and also the CO2 in the atmosphere.
My idea is to make very large Shade Balls or Shade Cylinders.

Cylinders could work well for Canals in Deserts.
For Something like the Salton Sea, then whole rows of Cylinders. It can partially sun follow either North South or East West.
The ball itself makes primarily of plastics, and the sundeck to keep UV off of the plastic for the most part.
The internal waters could be capable of supporting a crop. For instance, for the Dead Sea, you could put fresh water in and grow things like duckweed for instance.
Part of the game is to limit evaporation. So, if you did a lot of this you might be able to expand the Dead Sea, and cover the exposed toxic soils.
It would probably make sense to take water from the Colorado River and fill basins which will be evaporating prohibited. You could cover much of Lake Mead, I think.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Mead
Image Quote: ![]()
The green goblins with their anti-micro-plastics Hysteria, are most likely socialists and commie wanna-bees, who hope to cripple cultures they want to take over.
Tell them to cure micro-plastics for things like Car Tires and Synthetic Clothing before worrying about the Maximized Shade flotation devices.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
For Mars you might do it dry on flat soil. But later when the planet is partially terraformed it might be possible to convert over to very salty cold bring that they can float on.
Ending Pending ![]()
Here is an addition to the materials of the just prior post: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … 0cb2179c3f Quote:
1,000 Year Old Discovery In Greenland DESTROYS Everything We Knew
YouTube
Lost Evidence
47.2K views
Ending Pending ![]()
At least one flaw in the claims. Columbus did know about the Norse in North America. He spent a winter in Iceland studying their documents.
And the Catholic Church collected tithes from Greenland.
Ending Pending ![]()
I will make an exception here, as I consider Greenland to be part of my heritage, perhaps distantly but still I have a connection to it.
https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … df39541c77 Quote:
Ancient DNA Shows Vikings Were in America Much Longer Than We Thought!
YouTube
History Diary
51.9K views
Although my brother is 1/2 Swedish by family rumor., of that about half of it is Norwegian. I know that my Grandmother was from very close to Norway.
So, the Norse probably thought of the western settlements as being similar to the lands of Eurasia, that the Vikings also went into. Except that you could travel more by sea than by interior rivers.
The wood remnants and tar from North America seems tin indicate much more Viking activity in the west than was thought.
Indigenous genes from North America in the Greenlanders is an interesting find. I wonder if some of it got to Iceland? Iceland has some Denisovan genetic materials. Perhaps it came from North America?
https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-ev … ry-0013617
Quote:
The Far-Reaching Realms of Denisovan Ancestry Stretch to Iceland
Quote:
3.3%
Recent genetic studies have revealed that Icelanders possess a significant amount of Denisovan ancestry, approximately 3.3% of their genome. This ancestry is believed to have originated from Neanderthals, with possible additional contributions from Denisovans. The findings suggest that past interactions between the ancestors of Icelanders and either Neanderthals carrying Denisovan DNA or Neanderthals and Denisovans separately occurred, indicating that Icelanders may have inherited Denisovan genes from ancient populations.
Ancient Origins
+2
Someday, I would like to retrieve genes from the remains of the Greenlanders, and also the Dorset peoples, and to actually create children from them to include into our expansions into space.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorset_culture
It is common for human females to transfer into other families or groups, when they become fertile. I think we suffer some problems from not allowing it so early now. It may mess up girls to be kept as children so long in their birth families. I do understand why we delay that sort of thing now though, as humans may continue to evolve, puberty in girls may become more and more delayed.
But I think the most probable instance of a Native American going to Greenland with Vikings would likely be an orphan girl.
But perhaps they could also recruit an adult male Native American with skills.
I will be curious about the "Y" and Mitochondrial genes in the Greenlanders.
By the way Columbus spent a winter in Iceland before sailing to the Americas, probably consulting their records.
https://europeanconservative.com/articl … o-america/
Quote:
How Columbus’s Winter in Iceland Helped Him Get to America
But I will mostly try to avoid politics here now.
Ending Pending ![]()
I will say that if Europe breaks up we might consider an Arctic Ocean community including North America, the Nordics, and Russia.
If the Polar Sea is to melt more, we might as well use if until the climate can freeze it again.
Ending Pending ![]()
It is my suspicion that Scotland and North Ireland, are in Ethnographically Pacific waters, and that England, Wales and the rest of Ireland are in the Latin realm.
I believe that the injection of Latin associated genes modified the Americas so that there is a similar crossing point in Eastern Canida.
Ending Pending ![]()
I want to import this material from a topic about the Moon: https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 17#p237017
Quote:
I intend to try to have a discipline to avoid chat/politics. I will stay here (I hope) only for technological matters.
I really was excited about this: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … &FORM=VIRE Quote:
Railguns on the Moon? Elon Musk's Orbital AI Vision Could Build a Thriving Cislunar Economy
Yes, the story is rather optimistic, but it is good for the soul.
Ending Pending smile
So, my hope is that some of the content of that video, can be translated into efforts for Deimos/Phobos/Mars/Asteroids.
From post #28, I still am contemplating this: 
I want t
o describe better the "Mouth" of the collection process and then proposed chain of method to handle the "Ore".
So, you might imagine a stupid teen doing spins on gravel and tossing gravel into the air.
The tires can be rotated so that the air mis best to collect the ejected materials into the mouth of the Cone of the collector.
The Cone is spinning, so we are now handing, the "Ore" as "Pinned" by centrifugal force to the inside rim of the collector.
The wheels could be like those of a car with texture for traction, or perhaps a bit like riverboat paddles.
I have revised my notion as to hot have these free flying but to be attached to a larger device by a scissors type extender.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerial_work_platform
Image Quote: ![]()
OK POGO-TOP: 
The mouth part can be retracted into the bin, and gates at it's perimeter can open like on a train car that hauls iron ore. The regolith drops into the "Bin".
The device might be able to jump like a pogo stick up and down on the surface of a tiny world, using the scissors jack as the impulse.
The Bin and Mouth parts might spin in opposite directions like a top.
The Base of the Scissors Jack may have actuators that can move it to steer the bounces.
Of course, I have been formulating this while I did the drawing. So, alterations are expected. So, for instance the Bin, might resemble a larger form of the Mouth device. By doing Pogo and Spins, I hope to reduce the amount of thruster gas that might be necessary to manipulate the device.
When the Bin was "Filled", it would then by some means to a facility where it could be unloaded and the "Ore" be processed.
Ending Pending ![]()
I intend to try to have a discipline to avoid chat/politics. I will stay here (I hope) only for technological matters.
I really was excited about this: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … &FORM=VIRE Quote:
Railguns on the Moon? Elon Musk's Orbital AI Vision Could Build a Thriving Cislunar Economy
Yes, the story is rather optimistic, but it is good for the soul.
Ending Pending ![]()
I have seen Douglass McGreggor say that the Ukrainians have lost much more and the Russians not that much.
I cannot say it is a quote, but my impression is Ukraine 8 to Russia 1.
But this conversation is not useful it is only annoying you and wasting my time.
I think I will resign from the conversation. Reality will do whatever is will do and the future belongs to hose who will be there.
Relax, and believe what you want to believe.
Ending Pending ![]()