You are not logged in.
This seems like fun: https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/compani … r-AA1S9stV Quote:
US firm plans to fire lasers from satellites to power solar farms at night
Story by Chris Young • 5h •
2 min read
This would be helpful on Mars also I expect.
Ending Pending ![]()
This could apply here: https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/technol … r-AA1S9tWc
Solar-panel crops reveal a result that could change farming
Story by Cassian Holt • 6h •
8 min readMarkets today
This part excites me especially:
Apple orchards, vineyards and the “Apple Harvest” effect
While much of the early agrivoltaic work focused on vegetables and field crops, perennial systems such as orchards and vineyards are now emerging as some of the most promising test beds. Trees and vines already create layered canopies, and their long lifespans make it easier to justify the capital cost of solar infrastructure that will sit above them for decades. When panels are integrated thoughtfully, they can shape fruit development, protect blossoms from frost and hail and even influence flavor profiles.A French agrivoltaics specialist, Sun’Agri, has reported particularly striking outcomes from its 2024 Apple Harvest at two pilot agrivoltaic sites. According to the project data, the Apple Harvest results showed a yield boost of 20 percent to 60 percent in apples grown under the adjustable panels, which were programmed to optimize light and temperature for the trees. The same approach has been applied to vineyards, where grape yields under solar panels increased while irrigation needs were reduced and aroma profiles in the resulting wines improved, suggesting that agrivoltaics can be a tool not just for quantity but for quality in high value crops.
This Apple Tree especially. If you think about it, the solar panels will warm the air where the tree leaves are but cool the ground where the tree's roots are.
And the trees will shed their leaves for the winter which will be good for winter solar energy.
So, a bit more sunlight and infrared from the panels to warm the leaves, possibly extending the farming to somewhat higher latitudes, but the retention of soil moisture, perhaps extending the farming to somewhat water deficient places.
The emergence of robots could groom these lands, and they may be good places for people to raise children.
Ending Pending ![]()
A method to make useful buried ice at low latitudes that is not in a "Sheet" form could perhaps work to provide a utility to the Data Center technology that is being promoted by tech giants at this time.
https://phys.org/news/2024-01-mars-evid … dusae.html
Quote: 
At two locations the overburden seems to thin out. At about 500 km and 950 km on the chart.
Perhaps 100 meters or even less deep the ice body is evident.
I have several notions. I think drilling might initially allow the injection of heat to create melt water in the boundary between ice and overburden. If you had two drill sites, could you pass an electric current between them to continue the melting?
This situation may become unstable though, so perhaps you need to float on something such as an ice raft may be useful. But to stabilize an ice raft on Mars you might want to use, Solar Shades, Vapor Barriers, and perhaps heat pumps.
Unlike Earth where we might prefer data centers in orbit to shed heat and get solar power, on Mars we might use waste heat from data centers to melt water and produce ice rafts and might send power from orbit to these data centers.
It is in the nature of water ice to float on 32-degree water and for that 32-degree water to float on top of 39-degree water.
39-degree water is the heaviest fresh water then.
(0 degrees C, and 3.88888889 degrees C).
So, if you use 0 degree water to cool your data center, then you might mix your warm or hot output water with more 0 degrees water. If you have a resulting temperature of 3.89 degrees water it will fall to the bottom of the basin.
With an unstable bottom as ice melts, it even so may be possible to run electric currents though the the mud under the body of water, or it may even be possible to force circulate water into the mud above the ice.
There could be sudden upsets, but the best desire would be to keep the melt process moderated, with a slow expansion of ice covered bodies of water.
It might be possible to do farming under the ice, using chemicals from the atmosphere. Also, Oxygen, and Fuels like Acetate, Methane, and Hydrogen. There could be artificial lights imposed under the ice, and possibly a method for fiber optics might work.
It would be desirable to input as much energy from space to these ice platforms, but also at the same time keep the ice raft intact and not melted or evaporated.
>>>>>>>>>>>
Another location which might use this location could be in Candor Chaos.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-ne … 180979267/
Quote:
Beneath Canyons on Mars, Astronomers Find Potentially ‘Water-Rich Area the Size of the Netherlands’
A Martian orbiter located a large reserve of hydrogen in a mountainous area of the Red Planet
Elizabeth Gamillo
Elizabeth Gamillo - CorrespondentDecember 20, 2021
This ice does not seem to have as much overburden, but we do not know how deep it is.
So, actually while I do think about working with the polar ice caps of Mars eventually, it can be that we can do such work at lower latitudes prior to that and perhaps upgrade the climate of the planet before going to higher latitudes.
But I think that combining Ice, Water, Data Centers, and orbital power, could be very good for Mars, Note that instead of using our Moon to lift materials to orbit, Phobos and Deimos almost do not have gravity wells.
Ending Pending ![]()
This article can suggest how solar panels could be used to help protect ice rafts on Mars.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/technol … r-AA1S9tWc
Quote:
Solar-panel crops reveal a result that could change farming
Story by Cassian Holt • 6h •
8 min readMarkets today
Ending Pending ![]()
I do like the work of Peter Zeihan, but he is not perfect or (A god, nor should he need to be).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iG6j0eu … M&index=14
Quote:
Peter Zeihan doesn’t understand ... electricity.
Decarbonize!
But good for him, he does get a lot pretty close to right at times.
Ending Pending ![]()
I could not resist pushing the "10 Foot Sea" idea a bit further: 
The white rectangles between the above ice and lower liquid water, are both floats and thermal insulators.
Plastics as we know them are said to be able to last 1000 years, if buried and protected from UV and some other things that might break them down. The rectangles might be filled with a gelatin like simulation of whale blubber with entrained air bubbles perhaps.
A submarine is a means of transport; it may have propellers or just ride on the seabed with skids or wheels.
As much as 1/3 of Mars may have sufficient ice buried naturally, to attempt this with. Not all will be workable but large parts might be.
And some places not currently suitable might be made suitable.
For instance this large body of ice might be melted from energy from space orbit: https://phys.org/news/2024-01-mars-evid … dusae.html
Quote: 
This might create vast artesian springs, a large expanding body of water, and a raft of ice which might freeze on top of it.
To keep the ice from evaporating too much protection such as solar power devices may be place on top of the ice to provide shade, and vapor barriers created on top of the ice raft.
I would hope that this could be managed to be a gradually expanding body of water or several bodies of water.
Controlled melting of the ice body would be a desire.
Ending Pending ![]()
I need to give a chance to people to understand that the change in attitude of America about the world is not a chosen option. It is like the tide coming in or going out. You might have be used to it being one way and now it is going to go back to the other way.
You will be silly to try to stop the tide.
There are four domains of similar properties.
1) Europe (This does not only include the post Roman lands. It includes places like Hungary and Russia).
2) India (India is largely balanced unlike Europe).
3) North America (North America is in the process of re-acquiring its Eurasian half).
4) South America (This place has many Native American genomes even in the cone it is evolving).
These things are natural, I believe. Not only are their patterns, but they oscillate.
You cannot fight against such an oscillation as you might against a nation or set of nations.
It is extremely rude for Roman Europe to demand that the USA be only Roman in nature.
America is only claiming back what belongs to it.
Do not be so stupid as to think you Roman Europeans know how to play this game better than we do. We have the plan for survival, joy , and prosperity you have a plan for disaster. We have tried to work with you and you have been increasing levels of wrong.
Even if you could eliminate the MAGA, it would continue to rise. It is a natural tide. You must ride it does not stand in its way.
Why does this structure exist? Well, I am not sure, but I see it.
Don't be stupid.
We don't all want to die in flames with your stupid desire to fight the tide.
I think that the problem with the British is this.
The strip of land from England to Sweden was to some small degree one thing. But the Arfican/Asian polarity English/Swedish was too reactive. It could not be held together for more than a small amount of time.
The English in finally by force and bribe thinking that Scotland was an easy take-down, think that the entire Eurasian community must also bow to them.
But if you look on a global map you will see that the English did better around Africa than China.
America has with great trouble bridged this gulf we function on both sides where Britian is asymmetrical towards Africa.
We do not want to be dragged into your outdated stupid way of managing in the world.
We most likely can manage much better than that.
So, I would ask you to get rid of your colonial intentions towards the USA, as we don't want it.
Ending Pending ![]()
In relation to the regolith overburden on top of the ice, in the case where it is too thick it will need thinning.
Specific Gravity of ice: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals … A791140C52 Quote:
Professor P. L. Mercanton has sent the writer the results of some measurements of the density of clear ice at 0° C. in the Glacier de Saleinaz in 1917. These show densities of 0·9080, 0·9013, 0·9105 and 0·9050 respectively, giving a mean of 0·9059 gm./cc. Taken in conjunction with several measurements of ice with air bubbles, yielding values below 0·91, these results lead Professor Mercanton to the conclusion that for practical purposes it is preferable to use 0·90 rather than the usual 0·91 as the density of glacier ice.
If I try to estimate, then 9 feet of liquid fresh water could float on top of 100 feet of fresh water ice. (Ignoring that it would freeze and boil/evaporate).
I could not get the specific gravity of regolith on Mars, so:
Quote:
Copilot Search Branding
Images
Videos
Between 4 to 5
The specific gravity of regolith on Earth is a measure of its density relative to water. It is typically between 4 to 5, indicating that regolith is denser than water but lighter than solid rock. This property is crucial for understanding the mechanical behavior of regolith in various geological
So, that is a little rough on what I want to do, to be honest.
9 feet / 5 = 1.8 feet of regolith. I am going to suppose that 1 foot would be more trustworthy.
The natural amount of regolith on top of slabs of ice on Mars are considerably thicker. So, if you melted a 10 foot see at the base of the ice the weight of the regolith would weigh the ice down and the water would be squeezed up and out to the surface through cracks which would result from instability.
The necessity is that after the removal of excess regolith, probably a vapor barrier might need to be put down and then I hope a layer of compressed Mars regolith bricks/tiles.
In addition, it would be necessary to add solar equipment to provide sufficient shading to discourage mass wasting of the ice which has then been covered.
So, the total cannot weight more than a 1.8-foot layer of regolith would, and preferentially it would be less than a 1-foot layer would weigh.
So, not a free ride, but a possible method.
The excess regolith could be used to make berms, and otherwise might fill holes in the ice where all the water ice has been removed to manufacture things like rocket fuel with.
A different ice slab is looked at in this article: https://www.usgs.gov/news/national-news … ion-images
This one shows mass wasting on it's edge: ![]()
Quote:
The study, published in Science today, shows there is low rock and dust content in the exposed ice. This means that relatively pure water ice, capped by only a thin layer of ice-cemented rock and dust, may be readily accessible to future exploration missions.
Quote:
For the first time, high-resolution images show the three-dimensional structure of massive ice deposits on Mars. According to an in-depth analysis led by the USGS, the images reveal never-before-observed details about the ice sheets, including that some begin just a few feet below the Martian surface and extend to depths greater than 300 feet.
So, the ice is farily pure and may be 300 feet thick or so. So, maybe can allow for a "10 Foot Sea".
“There is ice under roughly a third of the Martian surface, which records the recent geologic history of Mars,” said USGS scientist and lead author of the study, Colin Dundas. “What we’ve seen here are cross-sections through the ice that give us a 3-D view with more detail than ever before. Having this degree of detail is an important contribution to the growing body of knowledge about conditions on Mars.”
Should we obtain salt, the sea water might float a regolith burden a bit better.
I have already said what some of the utility of a "10 Foot Sea" might be, but will add that with proximately 1 to 3 bars of weight on the water, a fair amount of Oxygen can be dissolved in the water. Since it is cold water this will be further facilitated.
On Earth, N2 in the water partially displaces the amount of Oxygen that could be dissolved in the water. If I suppose that the ratio is about 4 of N2 to 1 of O2, then for Mars we might reverse that. 1 of N2 & Argon to 4 of O2.
So, perhaps 4 times as much Oxygen in the water as would be normal for Earth at 1 bar. If the pressure would be 3 bar then perhaps 12 times as much Oxygen could be stored in the water.
If we input controlled amounts of O2 and Acetate/Methane/Hydrogen then we can store the Oxygen while facilitating the metabolism of the organisms in the water. Nitrogen/Argon could come from the Mars atmosphere by eliminating the CO2. In reality if you input some Mars atmosphere and Hydrogen, the CO2 would be consumed and a residue of Nitrogen/Argon may accumulate. However, some of the Nitrogen may be fixed by the living things, (We could hope).
So, it may be necessary to find a way to extract excess Argon from time to time. But the Argon would be of some value.
So, in the case of a winter or a dust storm a "10 Foot Sea" may be an Oxygen supply that could be accessed for various reasons. And Acetate might have been stored to distribute to the sea at such a time. But Mars being a natural freezer, food production during winter and dust storms should not be necessary.
As I have said previously, if the temperature of the water is 39 degrees F at the bottom of the sea, using a nuclear reactor, you could have not only the heat from the nuclear reactor but might use heat pumps to pull vibrations out of that water to produce even more hot water.
So, perhaps not all of the 1/3 of Mars that has ice sheets underground could have "10 Foot Seas", but much of it could.
Ending Pending ![]()
As a supplement, to the previous two posts, Lake Bakal in Russia may provide species suitable for a freshwater ecology in a "10 Foot Sea" on Mars.
Occasionally a part of the salt water ocean gets slowly converted to fresh water. This seems to be the case for Lake Bakal.
So, it has some ocean similar life that is now adapted to fresh water. And it is a cold lake.
https://baikalfoundation.ru/en/our-work … ke-baikal/
Quote:
Lake Baikal is home to many species that are found nowhere else in nature. Among green algae such endemics are more than half of the total number: 52,2%. These algae play an important role in the functioning of Baikal’s phytobenthos (a set of plant organisms living at the bottom of the lake).
However, it is extremely difficult to study them – Draparnaldioides, Ireksokonia and Myxonemopsis cannot be cultivated and maintained in artificial, laboratory conditions for a long time. It is still unknown to science how these algae evolved.
In 2023, the Baikal Museum of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences presented a project to study algae of the genera Draparnaldioides, Ireksokonia and Myxonemopsis. The scientists set themselves the task of studying phylogenetic relationships and reconstructing the ‘family tree’ of algae, as well as expanding information on these Baikal endemics and adding to the world databases on algae.
The Lake Baikal Foundation supported the project as part of the grant programme for the conservation of rare, endangered and endemic species of the Baikal Natural Area.
Ending Pending ![]()
Peter Zeihan has some things to say:
Well as is commonly true I cannot fetch this to my computer yet:
The Biggest Surprise in the Next Decade - Peter Zeihan, 2h ag
I think that something that is not typically supported by his side of evaluation of reality is that in the new circumstances there may be not reason to try to damage China. We may even want to see them supported to some degree, as long as they do not have claws and fangs for us today.
And the seme may be true for Russia.
Those who were eager for "The American Empire" and the "One Hegemon" to fall, may discover that we never liked that world anyway.
This could be much more suitable to our comfort.
Ending Pending ![]()
To append to the just previous post.
The heat in the "10 Foot Sea's" may increase too much. If you are dealing with fresh water then the water at the floor of the sea could be at as much as 39 degrees F, before turnover would happen. The water just under the ice would be 32 degrees F.
(3.88888889 to 0 C)
So we do not want to melt too much more of the ice above if we think that 10 feet is ideal.
So, if you have a nuclear reactor, you could use its electricity to run heat pumps to pull heat out of the bottom water. That could be used to heat things like habitats and Industrial Processes.
While you could melt the "10 Foot Sea's" with nuclear reactor water, the "10 Foot Sea's" will really be solar thermal heat storage.
First you generated chemicals that organisms could consume. Then the organisms gave off waste heat. The span of (3.88888889 to 0 C)
represents a mass storage of heat that a Heat Pump system could extract.
If you have saltwater things can get to be different. In fact it is possible to store much higher heats with salt gradients, but on the whole ice water may be very useful.
Ending Pending ![]()
To follow up on the previous post I have introduced a "10 Foot" sea. This in part is to annoy metric people. As it happens 1 foot of water on Mars exerts approximately 10 millibars of water column pressure. So, for Mars as this is important, I see a measurement of this sort as useful. Metric people are a little to arrogant anyway. Cheeze eaters! I like cheese also though.

Flat areas under a Mars ice slab could be "Diked" off using earthen berms.
A layer of water perhaps 10 feet deep could be melted. The pressure under the ice and dirt above it would be perhaps a bit more than a "Bar".
The water would be kept just as liquid, that warm only. So, Arctic in nature.
But diving bells could be warmer, perhaps comfortable for swimming or washing perhaps.
The "10 Foot Sea's" would allow transport of materials and would help to expose useful minerals. The "10 Foot Sea's" would also support life using chemicals, fiber optic light, and perhaps other artificial lighting.
Chemicals could include Oxygen, Nitrogen, CO2, Acetate, Methane, and Hydrogen. Those last two need to be prevented from coming out of solution, by limiting their amount.
The consumption of these chemicals will produce heat of biological origins.
So, this could be biologically productive.
Some useful microorganisms might be supported, and perhaps some macro-algae.
Articles:
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.10 … -33208-2_4
Quote:
Crucial part of the Arctic marine ecosystem
Polar macroalgae are a crucial part of the Arctic marine ecosystem, playing a significant role in primary production and supporting various marine species. They are adapted to the harsh conditions of the polar regions, including extreme temperatures and limited light availability during the Polar Night. These algae have developed unique adaptations such as low metabolic activity, lipid storage, and the ability to form resting stages to survive periods of darkness. They also have the capacity to grow new tissues in darkness, which allows them to resume growth rapidly once light returns. This ability to adapt and thrive in challenging environments makes polar macroalgae vital for the health and sustainability of the Arctic marine ecosystem.
So, very likely to provide chemicals for these life forms, Solar powered methods to generate the chemicals will work well. The water could be charged to the limits with Oxygen to get over periods where light is lacking. The chemicals like Acetate might be stored to have for such periods of time as well.
The "10 Foot Seas" then could provide much that could be useful to a Mars settlement process.
Ending Pending ![]()
A video that talks about AI data centers in space: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bne1Z_8j3uU
Quote:
Elon Just Confirmed His Mystery AI Was Real
Brighter with Herbert
The progression seems to be:
1) SpaceX or other capable.
2) Starlink
3) Sun-Synchronous Data Centers in space.
4) Moon
5) Mass Driver.
Sounds pretty good, I am rather comfortable with #1-#4.
#5 might be a teething problem.
Anthrofuturism has some videos about mass drivers: https://www.youtube.com/@Anthrofuturism
Here is one of their videos, I feel I should review some more: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxXbgalpheQ
It is actually quite beyond my paygrade. I am just not that mentally capable. Not so far at least. So, fine, if they figure out how to make a Mass Driver for the Moon, I will be delighted.
As a backup plan, I would like to speculate on an alternative that maybe would work.
1) SpaceX or other capable.
2) Starlink
3) Sun-Synchronous Data Centers in space.
4) Moon
5) Matter and Energy Projectors.
6) Retrieval of Deimos/Phobos/Asteroid mass to CIS Lunar Space.
For Matter Projectors, I would include:
a) Mass Drivers, if possible.
b) Electron Beam (Electrons have mass).
c) Lunar Lasers could project Photons which have inertia, I believe.
I wish....
d) Neumann Drive (As a matter projector).
e) Magdrive (As a matter projector).
I have already hoped that it might be possible to beam atoms of a conductive material from the surface of the Moon to impact on a orbital target device.
I do worry that the beam may spread too much.
The hope is that something like Iron atoms might vacuum welt to the target rather than to erode it. Silicon would be another material of interest, as well as Aluminum.
A question would be, can you use electron beams to manipulate this process?
https://www.space.com/space-exploration … ravel-tech
Perhaps the beams could push or contain the atom projections. Or perhaps if the target was charged to a very high (-) charge, it might attract the atoms.
I don't know these things.
If electrons could push a spacecraft to interstellar missions, perhaps then perhaps electron beams could push the targets to help maintain the orbits of them.
The atoms projected might also push the orbit of the targets that they would hit and we hop would weld to.
It this would work, then you would have matter to help make data centers with, and would also have matter in orbit that you could use to drive a spaceship to asteroids, using Magdrive or Neumann Drive.
At the asteroids with small gravity wells you might gain more Iron Silicon, Aluminum for propellants. But I would hope things like Hydrogen and Carbon that might be brought back to CIS Lunar Space. These may also be available from Demos and Phobos.
This would help integrate those moons into an early solar system economic structure.
Ending Pending ![]()
Perhaps however Carbon and Hydrogen might be available to CIS Lunar space instead.
Ending Pending ![]()
I hope you don't mind the intrusion.
It looks like China and Blue Origin will be able to "Top" Falcon 9 within a period of time. Just knowing something can be done allows them to skip many of the mistakes that SpaceX had to endure.
I am wondering if when the HLS is satisfied, SpaceX could adapt its reentry methods to the 2nd Stage of Falcon 9.
It would be a diversion. And Merlin Engines are not as good. But there may be many more Spaceports that an upgraded Falcon 9 could operate from. And if they had landing barges for Starship/Superheavy, they also could use them for the Falcon 9.
Not all payloads are Starship sized anyway.
They have the Heat Shield almost figured out and the flaps are pretty much understood. But I expect that a Falcon 9 2nd Stage would have to do a "Hover Slam" landing like the 1st stage does.
Maybe they could upgrade the 2nd stage to Metha-Lox???
Granted, it is a diversion but the competitors don't have these skills yet.
Ending Pending ![]()
If they made is correctly then it could also be lofted to orbit by Starship itself at times and be a 3rd Stage "Starboat".
Ending Pending ![]()
Void the evil has rebelled against (th) and is revising site selection. Back to this: https://www.space.com/30502-mars-giant- … y-mro.html
Image Quote: 
This ice slab seems to have "Splosh Craters".
Thise may allow for an Amphitheatre Solar Collection Scheme.
This scheme which might be applied to Korolev Crater could also be applied to some degree here: 
Unlike Korolev, there is not a pool of ice in the center, but the crater itself seems to be carved out of a giant slab of ice.
We might place solar devices on the south facing inner rim. This could be solar panels or a collection of mirrors.
Yes, solar power on Mars is not as good as on Earth, but it exists. The other options that might come into play might be Nuclear, Geothermal, or Orbital Solar.
Orbital Solar only makes sense as if we are to make Mars to some degree a "Second Earth", The Earth soon will be likely to have massive orbital solar installations to support data centers, and to some limited degree perhaps to transfer power to and from the surface of the planet.
Some very important specs for the ice sheet are listed here:
The ice the scientists found measures 130 feet (40 m) thick and lies just beneath the dirt, or regolith, or Mars.
"It extends down to latitudes of 38 degrees. This would be like someone in Kansas digging in their backyard and finding ice as thick as a 13-story building that covers an area the size of Texas and California combined," Bramson said.
Kansas is close to the latitude of Spain, which is a place which will have winter sunshine, and is likely suitable for solar energy.
While Mars has dust problems/storms, it also does not have snows, or hail that we know of and the atmosphere is thin. We would not expect many clouds to block the sun.
When solar works at this location it should work well.
An interesting solar setup for Mars could involve Heliostat mirrors, Solar Panels to receive light from the mirrors, and a heat pump to extract heat from the solar panels to keep them cool/cold.
It is evident on Earth at this time that Heat Pumps could generate heat as much as 180 Degrees C. Expectations are that they will do better in the future. While during day time both Electricity and industrial heat could be obtained, at night heat could be rejected by the heat pumps and solar panels.
The Ice Slab Scheme needs things to be solved, but might offer some level of promise: 
And keep in mind that this ice slab is the size of California and Texas.
We do not know what the regolith under the ice is like, perhaps sometimes it is rubble, (Icy or Dry), or a lava layer maybe with a lava tube, or Sandstone.
A Starship landed successfully in a VOID, without crash or cave-in then will instantly be much more protected from the Martian environment.
Once the VOID was sealed up it may even be possible to pressurize the VOID.
Some VOIDs could grow mushrooms, or maybe even Apple Trees.
Ending Pending ![]()
This seems to be good clean fun: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … &FORM=VIRE
Quote:
TRUMP vs EUROPE!: The New Cold War Begins | With Joaquin Flores and Blaine Holt
YouTube
CRYPTO RICH POLITICS
1 views
2 hours ago
I need to hear it again. I sounded really interesting in my car. Explaining current reality.
Ending Pending ![]()
An interesting re-conception of humans:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tI2BfoWDP4I
Quote:
Neanderthals Were Not Replaced
Highly Compelling
I am in agreement, to a large extent.
I have long considered that it was wrong to consider that the "Pure" "Homo-Sapiens" from Africa were the only true humans.
And I agree that the majority of genes which were common between Eurasian and African gene pools should not be called "Homo-Sapiens".
They belonged to the Neanderthals and Denisovans as well.
I think that European upper class arrogance, presumed that people who seldom went into the sunlight to do farm work, being pale to the level of being unhealthy, would be the blessed form that coming from Africa, were then the very bestest!
I think that even if African genetics had ceased to exist, with the invention of greater technology over time, the need for a Neanderthal body form would have relaxed. Heavy bones, massive muscles, and the need for lots of animal fats would relax, as the means of obtaining survival became less demanding per cold and the hunting of large animals.
People building better buildings and better clothing, could relax gradually from the need for extreme biology. Brain improvement over time and accumulated knowledge would have led to the creation of better shelter and clothing.
Ending Pending ![]()
So, at the core of this would be "Inflated, Frozen, Mud-Balloons".
Quote:
With an electric power source you might maintain proper temperatures using heat pump technology.
Probably the walls of the arch need to be much thicker than what I show here.
The Mud would be composed of dirt, water ice, and fibers. The fibers could be organic grown, or mineral wool, or plastic fibers of manufacture.
Regolith might be about 3.0 specific gravity, I think.
On Mars, about 100 feet of water can give a pressurization of about 1000 millibars. I believe that that is about 30 meters.
Ice is less dense so perhaps you need about 110 feet of ice to pressurize to 1000 millibars.
But dirty ice, will weigh more, depending on content. I intend to have a dominantly find regolith mix, with the minimum of ice to bind it together.
I will intend to include some fiber in the frozen mud mix.
I will go with the 3.0 number, so about 33 feet of mud will give 1000 millibars of pressure, if that were so.
There are certain pressure minimums.
Less than 100 millibars might be suitable to some non-vascular life such as Algae perhaps.
100 millibars is perhaps close to the tolerance for most vascular crops. It is not enough to sustain human life though.
250 millibars of Oxygen is probably about the minimum for human life to be sustained.
333 millibars of Oxygen may be more suitable for human life.
I think a mix of O2/N2 at 500 millibars or more would be better for human life.
Quote:
I will go with the 3.0 number, so about 33 feet of mud will give 1000 millibars of pressure, if that were so.
So, 16.5 feet for 500 millibars.
11 feet for 333 millibars.
8.25 feet for 250 millibars.
I would propose this sort of construction primarily to support agriculture, and to give extra space for human do things like walk around and run around.
The three sorts of agriculture I am aware of at this time are:
-Photosynthesis, natural light.
-Photosynthesis, artificial light. (LED's, Fiber Optics).
-Chemosynthesis.
The use of O2 and Acetate is the process of decay product simulation, supporting life.
Using an electrolyze process, O2 and Acetate are produced from CO2 and water.
These simulated decay world products apparently will support Yeast, Algae, and Mushroom life rather well, and vascular plants less well.
My hope is that by adding 1%, 5%, 10% lighting the vascular plants will do well. Artificial lighting is more expensive than natural light, but on Mars we cannot have natural light as you have to at least have a greenhouse glass.
O2/Acetate is less expensive than natural photosynthesis.
So, the balance of O2/Acetate dominant with a small amount of artificial light may be of an acceptable cost. Keep in mind that it is possible that fiber optics might work.
Ideally then you could grow crops which may provide not only foods but useful fibers.
Now, if someone wants to make glass domes, that is fine. But I am looking to provide bulk agriculture at a reasonable cost.
The mud domes will be filled with air, to help avoid collapse.
The domes may have a protective vapor barrier over them and may be shaded by solar panels as well.
The domes may have a poly type film inside of them to help hold air pressure and to help avoid freeze drying.
The domes may have additional supports if they can be afforded, made of stones, Plastics, and metals. Perhaps domes inhabited by humans may have this expense.
The domes will have a plastic dome inside of them that allows heat pumps to move heat away from the mud domes into a more interior space under such a plastic dome.
The domes may have water/ice pools inside or might have soils. Maybe soils to grow mushrooms, or soils to grow vascular plant crops.
I think it should be noted that Mars probably has lots of building materials for frozen mud domes.
Ending Pending ![]()
Frozen Mud Domes, do not prevent the creation of tunnels and vaults in the solid rock below: https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 19#p233319
This would be an extra safety feature.
Ending Pending ![]()
Continuing with the 4th Shale Revolution from the last post: https://zeihan.com/the-fourth-shale-rev … ajor-tech/
Search Quote:
The Fourth Shale Revolution refers to a significant technological advancement in the oil and gas industry, particularly in the U.S. This revolution is driven by ExxonMobil's introduction of a new type of proppant, which is a lightweight synthetic version made from petroleum coke. This proppant is designed to enhance well productivity by allowing for deeper penetration into rock formations and increased suspension in low-viscosity fluids, potentially leading to up to a 20% uplift in well productivity. This innovation is expected to reshape the energy landscape, similar to the previous revolutions in shale technology that focused on natural gas and liquid oil extraction.
I feel that it is important that if an income from Hydrocarbons is to occur on the planet, we should prefer that that income goes to the "Good-Guys" as much as possible.
We should want to starve evil entities of such an income, if that is reasonably a thing that can be done. And yes, as an American, of course I consider "Good" to be an American potential, and an ideal. So, then those who try to spread their "Not-Good", ideas by Verbal and Violent means, and those who intend to reform the world including the USA to something not "Good", are our enemies.
We are allowed to have our preferences, and if we are empowered we should support our preferences.
As for alternative energy, I welcome it.
I would like the Petrochemical industry to transition to making material goods more and fuels less, as it becomes economic to do that.
Ending Pending ![]()
(th) Made a request. I tried to comply. Since I am confused as to what was desired, I will put the existing work to satisfy his original request here. https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 66#p235966
Quote:
This on this macro-scale will be my design:
Rather than to put a convex dome into a crater, I prefer on the macro Scale to visualize the greater structure as concave to the sky.
I wish also to include this sort of thing on a smaller scale: https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=7514
Quote:
With an electric power source you might maintain proper temperatures using heat pump technology.
And from the just prior post this:
https://depositphotos.com/photo/a-grass … 48046.html
Image Quote:You would have to be able to grow some sort of vascular land plant, "Grass", and make artificial "Sticks" using those plants and some sort of glue.
My objective is to produce large amounts of structure using relatively low-grade materials to convert into resources.
But high-grade materials will also be used where it has merit.
It is late.
Ending Pending ![]()
I will consider participating. I had a look at the site, and I am not sure of water/ice availability, or radiation protection. I will presume Ice availability and will take the radiation problem as a challenge. I will hope to dominantly use bulk materials like soil and ice as primary construction materials.
This on this macro-scale will be my design: 
Although I show only the concave face pointing to the sky, sub-elements may be convex pointing to the sky.
I intend to be able to have arrays of mirrors that can concentrate solar energy to various points/towers.
Also, a power grid could involve laser/tuned solar panels that also can carry information.
Choose a spot on the site and I will participate.
Ending Pending ![]()
A "Fourth" Shale Revolution: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … &FORM=VIRE
Quote:
The Fourth Sale Revolution: Supermajor Tech || Peter Zeihan
YouTube
Zeihan on Geopolitics
357.8K views
Key word is "Proppant".
There is some notion I encountered on line that suggested that "Breakeven" price could be $45.00/Barrel. (Probably best case I think).
So, adding capacity each year.
So, I am also a fan of RethinkX which is about an electric economy more based on wind and solar.
And we apparently are going to have data base demand to satisfy. Even expanding into space. So, the energy sector is going to stay big, it looks like.
As I recall when I first encountered his materials, Peter Zeihan did not think that we would be able to do the "Electric Economy" for lack of materials. Things seem to have improved now. Aluminum and Sodium Batteries for instance.
The need for global commerce to obtain materials and the possession of a major market plus the avoidance of hookers seems to me now to be the most important aspects of the present situation.
The grooming of money so that "Good" money can be more dominant than "Bad" money. The avoidance of the emergence of "Mischief" money.
I give high marks to this administration and terrible marks to the previous administration.
"Mischief" money is typically money that is obtained without virtuous behaviors, and which is then applied by people of poor character to warp healthy societies.
Two significant camps for this are Old World Oil Money, and Money from Harmful Drugs. These are prominent at this time.
It has occurred to me that it is not only the drugs that have a harmful effect, but the conduction of money to the wicked that matter. Americans ar partially guilty for consuming and so then buying those drugs, but it is those who obtain money while not doing a good service, who entirely carry the blame for how evil money is spent.
Many would be eager to say that Americans are responsible for the drug trade for being the consumers of it. But during the Opium wars will you also say that it was the Chinese who were similarly responsible? Does that excuse the entities that support the illegal drug industry?
Oil and natural gas, also have cases of "Mischief" money. The better the USA satisfies it's own market the less of that there will be around the world.
Money easily obtained in some "OPEC" countries can often become "Mischief" money if the Verbal and Violent are allowed access to it.
So, to make a better world, the less "Mischief" money the better.
Globalization encourages "Mischief" money, and funnels it into the hands of those who only do evil deeds with their words, minds, and hands.
So, in the case of "Mischief" money LESS IS MORE!
Ending Pending ![]()
OK, this is mostly welcome!
https://www.msn.com/en-us/travel/news/a … sz#image=1
Quote:
Alien life on the moon? New findings say maybe
©Shutterstock
For decades, the moon was seen as a barren, bone-dry world with no atmosphere, no liquid water, no magnetic shield, and extreme swings in temperature. The idea that it could ever support life seemed far-fetched. But recent discoveries are changing that view.Thanks to new space missions and advanced analysis of lunar rocks and soil, scientists have found surprising signs of water—not just on the surface, but deep within. Some studies suggest the moon’s interior may hold as much water as Earth’s upper mantle, urging scientists to rethink its history and potential.
In this gallery, explore the latest discoveries that are transforming our understanding of the moon and revealing its unexpected potential to support life, whether in the distant past, the present, or the possibilities of the future. Click on for more.
Quote:
Our old friend in the sky
©Getty Images
For as long as we’ve looked up at the night sky, the moon has felt like an old friend, mysterious and full of wonder. It has inspired our stories, guided our dreams, and reminded us how deeply we long to reach beyond our own world.
Quote:
Water’s role in the moon’s birth
©Getty Images
Scientists believe the moon was born from a massive impact about 4.5 billion years ago. While it’s unclear how much water survived that violent event, new models suggest that some water molecules may have been trapped in the debris, eventually becoming part of the moon itself.
Quote:
How water may have reached the moon
©Getty Images
Evidence of water found in lunar basalt samples at concentrations of several hundred parts per million has scientists weighing two possibilities: either water survived the moon’s violent formation, or it arrived soon after through asteroid impacts.
Quote:
The moon’s fiery beginnings
©Getty Images
After it formed, the moon was likely covered in a deep ocean of molten rock. As this magma cooled, it released gases into space, creating short-lived atmospheres that may have helped shape the moon’s early environment.
Quote:
The moon’s ancient atmosphere
©Getty Images
New research suggests the moon’s volcanic activity may have created a temporary atmosphere that lasted around 70 million years. An earlier, thicker atmosphere, formed after the moon’s molten phase, could have lingered even longer.
Quote:
Where water might have lingered on the moon
©Getty Images
Instead of lingering on the surface, water may have been more stable underground. Scientists believe it could have collected in tiny pockets within the thick, broken rock layer created by ancient asteroid impacts, similar to subsurface environments found on Earth.
Quote:
Could the moon have had oceans?
©Getty Images
In the final stages of the moon’s molten phase, known as the lunar magma ocean, significant amounts of water were present. If just 500 parts per million of that water escaped as gas, it could have formed a surface layer up to one kilometer (0.6 miles) thick.
Quote:
Water in the moon’s molten past
©Getty Images
But without a thick atmosphere to hold it in place, much of that water would likely have escaped, especially after asteroid impacts. Still, it shows just how much water might have been there.
Quote:
A glimpse at lunar habitability
©Getty Images
According to Dirk Schulze-Makuch, an astrobiologist at Washington State University and the study’s lead author, if the early moon had both liquid water and a thick atmosphere for extended periods, its surface could have been briefly suitable for life.
Quote:
One theory of life’s origins
©Shutterstock
One theory suggests that once the basic ingredients for life came together, it may have taken less than 10 million years for cyanobacteria, simple, oxygen-producing microbes, to appear.
Quote:
Life may have sparked quickly
©Shutterstock
If the theory holds true, the leap from nonliving matter to a living system might have happened much faster than expected, possibly in just a few thousand years. To put it simply: if life can form quickly, then it’s possible the moon once hosted it.
Quote:
The mystery of life’s first spark
©Getty Images
On the other hand, some scientists argue that we still don’t fully understand how life began on early Earth, especially how it learned to replicate. Because of that, it’s nearly impossible to pin down how long the process might have taken.
Quote:
Could life have reached the moon?
©Getty Images
Another theory suggests life may have arrived from elsewhere, carried by meteorites flung across space during the Solar System’s chaotic early years, when giant impacts were common.
Quote:
Could life have reached the moon?
©Getty Images
During the moon’s early history and even later, the theory posits that meteorites launched from Earth by massive impacts likely landed on the lunar surface. Some of these space rocks may have survived the crash, possibly carrying traces of life with them.
Quote:
Could life have reached the moon?
©Shutterstock
Since life may have existed on Earth as early as 4.28 billion years ago, it’s possible that microbes hitched a ride to the moon on meteorites. And if the moon had even a thin atmosphere at the time, it could have slowed those impacts, giving the microorganisms a better chance of surviving the journey.
Quote:
Life’s building blocks from afar
©Getty Images
Of course, a livable environment needs more than just water and an atmosphere. While it’s unclear whether the moon had its own organic compounds, scientists believe they could have arrived from Earth, carbon-rich asteroids, or other sources.
Quote:
Searching for signs of ancient life
©Getty Images
If the moon ever had habitable environments, would any traces remain today? Unlike Mars, the moon doesn’t show signs of water-shaped terrain; there are no river channels or crater rims softened by flowing liquid. So far, the evidence is elusive.
Quote:
Ancient lunar water may have left no trace
©Getty Images
After four billion years of relentless exposure to solar wind, cosmic radiation, and micrometeorite impacts, it’s unlikely that any surface features shaped by early water have survived on the moon, at least based on current evidence, satellite data, and the lunar soil samples collected during past missions.
Quote:
Lava layers may hold water secrets
©Getty Images
While surface evidence may be scarce, scientists have found limited signs of oxidation and hydrothermal activity in lunar rocks. A promising next step is to search for water in ancient soil layers trapped between lava flows from the moon’s volcanic peak.
Quote:
Shared hydration history of Mars and the moon
©Getty Images
Interestingly, scientists believe that early Mars may have formed clay through water released by cooling magma. If that happened on Mars, the same process may have occurred on the moon, too.
Quote:
Lunar samples may still hold water clues
©Getty Images
Even if the early moon had far less liquid water than Mars, scientists haven’t ruled it out entirely. Future studies of lunar samples could still uncover signs that water once flowed across the moon’s surface.
Quote:
The moon’s brief window for life
©Getty Images
Based on current data, if the early moon had liquid water and a substantial atmosphere for millions of years, its surface was likely at least temporarily habitable and may have held the basic building blocks needed for life to take root.
Quote:
A distant possibility
©Getty Images
Whether life ever began on the moon or arrived from elsewhere is still highly speculative. Answering that question will require courageous and sustained lunar exploration in the years ahead.
Exploring ancient lava layers
©Getty Images
Quote:
The goal for future lunar exploration will be collecting samples from paleoregolith—ancient soil trapped between lava flows from the moon’s volcanic peak. These layers could reveal whether hydrated conditions or other signs of habitability existed during that time.
Quote:
Testing life in simulated lunar conditions
©Getty Images
To explore the moon’s potential for life, scientists could run experiments in Earth-based simulation chambers that mimic early lunar conditions.
Quote:
A new home for lunar and Martian missions
©Getty Images
One example of innovation in space habitation is Eurohab, an inflatable habitat designed for missions on the moon or Mars. Developed by Peter Weiss and Jean-Jacques Favier, co-founders of Spartan Space, the concept is part of CNES’ "Tech The Moon" program and is backed by the European Space Agency (ESA).
Quote:
Earth labs ready to test lunar life
©Getty Images
Many research institutions already have the facilities and tools to simulate early lunar conditions, and they can be adapted to test whether microbes could survive in the moon’s ancient environment.
Quote:
Simulating lunar life in Earth labs and orbit
©Getty Images
Moon-analog tests are already underway aboard the International Space Station, including the BIOMEX project, which studies how life responds to space-like environments.
Quote:
Secrets waiting to be discovered
©Getty Images
Whether life once flickered beneath its lava flows or drifted in from distant worlds, the answers still rest in its ancient soil. As we continue to explore, the moon might still surprise us, adding a new chapter to its story and changing how we see life beyond Earth.Sources: (NASA) (Euronews) (Astronomy Magazine) (Futurism)
So, let's find out.
So, I Forsee a contest between the Pioneer Nature and the Slaver Natures. The Slavers will try to use this as an impediment to Pioneer expansion into the solar system as they see all humans, especially trust cultures with talents as their food. They do not want their food to leave the planet and be out of reach.
So, we are just going to have to explain to them that we could make their lives very not nice.
Ending Pending ![]()
I suppose I may be annoying you Calliban, but if you could design a dome shaped frame that is reusable, then a mix of fine ice particles and Mars soil could be piled on it. And a organic fiber such as from a plant or Mycelium from mushrooms, might be added. A microwave warming process used with a method to tamp the melting mixture would allow a freeze dome.
When completed, shading might be added to the outside using solar panels as an option.
You could then remove the original frame for reuse.
Then you might put a poly film dome inside of that dome.
Then inside of that dome you might put habit or farm methods, such as ponds for Algae, or a Mushroom farm, or even farming with vascular plants.
With an electric power source you might maintain proper temperatures using heat pump technology.

https://modernfarmer.com/2022/07/artifi … synthesis/
Quote:
Consumption
Cultivating Crops, No Sun RequiredResearchers have discovered a new way to grow plants using artificial photosynthesis, requiring no sunlight at all.
#Plants & Crops
by Shea Swenson· July 28, 2022
Electricity from nuclear reactors also very welcome.
Maybe this could be tried in the Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine areas on Earth.
Ending Pending ![]()
I enjoyed the video. When I was younger I used to seek out information about the Inuit, the Norse, and the Polynesians.
As I recall, the Igloo was a temporary shelter.
They would have an oil lamp, perhaps made of carved soapstone: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qulliq
Image Quote:
I think a woman maintained it.
How they managed keeping it lit or relighting it I don't strongly recall. That would help to retain heat.
They may have fixed a blanket or skin above them in the igloo. I seem to recall that. Not 100% certain.
They usually would not have endured the coldest winters such as Yakuts does, Yakuts is a continental climate where often the Inuit would be near the sea.
Rather than bring their outer coats into the interior of the igloo, they would brush the snow off of them and store them in the cold of the entrance as I recall. This was to keep them dry.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I agree that there is much to learn. In space generally where there will be water, it will be cold.
A multi-layer scheme can work. Something like Icecrete for an outer structure, with some protection to it from ice evaporation, and then
an inner structure.
But we can combine these sensible notions with some modern technology. I would consider grass huts if you could grow something like grass, and heat pumps instead of oil lamps. Where heat pumps will not consume Oxygen and yet could pull heat out of the "Igloo" air, and pump it into a "Grass Hut".
For flooring perhaps Patio Bricks with something like Styrofoam under it.
Nuclear Reactors to churn out electricity also very desirable. Solar as an additional contribution.
Thanks,
Ending Pending ![]()
There is a new discovery about the metabolism of the Inuit. They have something similar to the Denisovans. They can eat a lot of animal fats to keep warm. Neanderthal may have been similar. I think that their diet might not be good for us.
And that might have been the secret of the replacement of Denisovans and Neanderthals. If fatty food was not available, they would starve more than people who had our diet.
https://blog.everythingdinosaur.com/blo … rvive.html
Quote:
Extinct Human Cousin Helped the Inuit Survive According to New Paper
So, it might be sensible to give such an inheritance though gene grafting to many people who will go into space, provided that technology could generate a large supply of healthy fats to eat. This might allow for less life support heating. It might be possible at the same time 'Tweek" sensory structures to not feel cold at a lower temperature.
Similarly adaptations to thin air might be considered, from Tibet, the Andes for low Oxygen content, and those people who have an enlarged spleen who dive a lot, for temporary lack of Oxygen.
]https://www.zmescience.com/science/biol … en-042432/
Quote:
‘Sea nomads’ evolved abnormally large spleens to dive to unheard-of depths
Natives of Indonesia can dive up to 70 meters thanks to a genetic adaptation.Tibi PuiubyTibi Puiu November 17, 2022 in Biology, News
A A
I think that possibly a biomechanical artificial spleen might be considered.
Ending Pending ![]()