Announcement

Announcement: This forum is accepting new registrations via email. Please see Recruiting Topic for additional information. Write newmarsmember[at_symbol]gmail.com.
  1. Index
  2. » Search
  3. » Posts by Void

#1 Re: Not So Free Chat » Transportation Issues and the Development of Worlds. » Yesterday 11:10:42

The structure I have suggested for the Moon might work well for Mars and maybe some other worlds.

From the just prior post:

AgeUYEB.jpg

Presuming that the Sand Silo's with the use of infrared solar panels, could provide electricity in a economic fashion, here is a partner technology for it on various worlds.

This is probably a video that is similar to the one I watched: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … &FORM=VIRE  Quote:

Utube America's New Invention Could Replace Oil Forever, 1h ago
18:21

America's New Invention Could End Petroleum Motor Oil Forever
YouTube
Ironclad Report

This on is the one I watched that is not available: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … &FORM=VIRE  Quote:

America's New Invention Could Replace Oil Foreve
YouTube
Sebastian Ovac

The video I watched suggested that the process was 40 times as efficient (40%), as Photosynthesis is at 1%

The cost of electricity is still too high for it, but not perhaps that bad in some favored locations.

On Mars this process might be very useful, maybe on the Moon as well.

Substances other than Oil can be made, and I suspect that Acetate would be in reach of it.

So, probably we are on our way towards a very good future.

However, for alien worlds, I expect that electric land vehicles are going to be better than those that need Oxygen to burn hydrocarbons.

Ending Pending :-)

I am not sure that the available video is very similar to the one that is not available.

Ending pending :-)

#2 Re: Not So Free Chat » Transportation Issues and the Development of Worlds. » Yesterday 10:09:21

Here is a notion of how to incorporate a thermal sand silo into radiation protection methods: sZhJBs9.jpg

A toroid vertical tube sand silo, might store heat, and yet not overheat the sheltered area, and protect to some large extent the sheltered area.

OK, I have added a pond above the sheltered area where perhaps Algae or Duck Weed might be grown.  Presuming water is available.

The formation may add some protection for the greenhouse from impactors.

AgeUYEB.jpg

So the Toroid Silo may hold temperatures 100 to 1000 or more degrees C, and the walls may be insulated by hanging curtains which may be drawn back to expose infrared solar panels, this then to produce electricity.

If you can make it better, please do so.

Ending Pending :-)

#3 Re: Human missions » Starship is Go... » Yesterday 08:37:54

Obviously, GW is the guy for a reply, but I will offer this:

Query: "Did the Falcon 9 cargo capacity increase over time?"

Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
Falcon 9 Cargo Capacity Over Time
Yes — the Falcon 9’s cargo capacity has increased significantly from its first version in 2010 to the current Block 5 configuration.

Original v1.0 (2010–2013)

LEO payload: ~10,400kg (22,900lb) when expendable
Wikipedia
Wikipedia

GTO payload: ~4,500kg (9,900lb)
Wikipedia
Wikipedia

Powered by 9× Merlin1C engines, with a launch mass of ~333,000kg.

This version was fully expendable, with no stage reusability.

v1.1 (2013–2016)

LEO payload: ~13,100kg (28,900lb)
Wikipedia
Wikipedia

GTO payload: ~4,800kg (10,600lb)
Wikipedia
Wikipedia

Upgraded to Merlin1D engines in an octaweb layout, longer tanks, and first attempts at first-stage landings.

Full Thrust (v1.2, 2015–2018)

LEO payload: ~22,800kg (50,300lb)
Wikipedia
Wikipedia

GTO payload: ~8,300kg (18,300lb)
Wikipedia
Wikipedia

Introduced densified, sub-cooled propellants, increasing fuel load and performance.

Block5 (2018–present)

LEO payload: ~22,800kg (50,300lb)
Wikipedia
Wikipedia
+1

GTO payload: ~8,300kg (18,300lb) expendable; ~5,500kg (12,100lb) when first stage lands
Wikipedia
Wikipedia

Designed for rapid reuse, with improved engines, thermal protection, and grid fins.

Fairing recovery also reduces cost and increases effective payload.

Summary of growth

From v1.0 to v1.1: LEO capacity increased by ~30% (10.4ton → 13.1ton).

From v1.1 to Full Thrust: LEO capacity more than doubled (13.1ton → 22.8ton).

Block5 maintains the same LEO rating as Full Thrust but improves GTO performance when reusability is factored in.

Conclusion:
The Falcon 9’s cargo capacity has more than doubled in LEO since its debut, driven by engine upgrades, propellant densification, and structural improvements. The Block5 version now offers the highest LEO payload of any Falcon9 variant, while reusability and fairing recovery further enhance its operational efficiency

Wikipedia
Wikipedia
+2
.

So, nothing guaranteed, but there is hope.

Your argument against Starship would have been appropriate for Falcon 9 in the beginning, but it would have been a disgrace for comments such as yours to have killed Falcon 9 in its infancy.

Ending Pending :-)

#4 Re: Not So Free Chat » Transportation Issues and the Development of Worlds. » Yesterday 08:11:54

Here is a proposal for a gas mobilized sand battery, perhaps for the Moon: MsZnVqw.jpg

I am presuming a mobilizer gas such as Oxygen or CO2, maybe H20. 

The gas at the top compressed into a pipe, the pipe spraying into a venturi like sand pickup device.  I expect vibrations to be induced as well to fluidize the sand.

The Sand and Gas mix goes into an oven where concentrated solar energy from heliostats heats the mix.

Then the sand/gas mix is vented into the top of the Silo, where they separate.  A pump with filter process compresses the gas again.

I consider this to be a starter notion, not a proven and experiment proven device.  Obviously much more is desired that what this could do.

We do have the problem of reactions with the substances of the "Oven", to the mobilizing gas at high temperatures.

It is just a try.

But a gasless method also may work, which might have mechanisms resembling how a grain silo works on Earth.

Ending Pending :-)

#5 Re: Not So Free Chat » Transportation Issues and the Development of Worlds. » Yesterday 02:51:39

There are things in existence on Earth that are already in the family: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … &FORM=VIRE  Quote:

Utube, Solar Is Already Dead? The Carbon Battery That Could Replace Solar Panels, Sept 12 2026
27:52

Solar Is Already Dead? The Carbon Battery That Could Replace Solar Panels
YouTube
Muskaan Khan
3 views

A device on the Moon that uses mobilizable "Sand", may have some relationship to these things.

We might imagine a Farm Silo that also has characteristics of a Thermos Bottle.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silo
Image Quote:
From Mexico: 1920px-Silos%2C_Acatl%C3%A1n%2C_Hidalgo%2C_M%C3%A9xico%2C_2013-10-11%2C_DD_02.JPG?utm_source=en.wikipedia.org&utm_campaign=imageinfo&utm_content=thumbnail

Grain Silo's:
Image Quote: 1280px-Port_Giles_silos.jpg?utm_source=en.wikipedia.org&utm_campaign=imageinfo&utm_content=thumbnail

Some of the solutions for "Flowing" grain might apply to flowing "Sand".  During flow it may be possible to expose the flow to the direct heat of Lunar sunlight or to output from concentrating Mirrors.

Here I would be imagining unpressurized systems It might be possible to pressurize a system with Oxygen, water vapor, or CO2.  It might be worthwhile to import Carbon for this purpose.  In such a system you may be able to have means to vacuum the "Sand" up from the bottom, and present it to a heating method and then deposit it on the top of the Silo. 

Of course these methods may be subject to "Jams", and so robotics are desired to substitute for a human to work those lose, or to repair the mechanisms.

I am starting to work on the notion that some form of silo might also offer radiation protection to humans and electronics.  Of course, high heat is in conflict with habitats, but if you arranged silo's around a habitat, they may offer some protection without overhating the habitat.

With a vacuum barrier, it may even be possible to keep a hot sand on one side of the gap and a habitat wall on the other side of the vacuum gap.

But this needs some more evaluation.  Perhaps there are things to discover in that area.

So, yes I think Sand Silo's on the Moon may be useful.

Ending Pending :-)

#6 Re: Science, Technology, and Astronomy » Geothermal and Geothermal Battery (Changed Title 12/21/23) » 2026-09-16 20:55:17

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fIYRh8MlFC0
Quote:

America Found Something Better Than Oil Underground
AI


Atlashade and ForgedOrigins

I have to wonder if soon we will have Geothermal, Solar 40%+, Wind that is practical, Nuclear Fission, Nuclear Fusion, Natural Hydrogen, And power beamed from orbit.

The arrogant Eloy in Europe and Canada will have destroyed the Industrial people as they demand that they should rule without having merit.
(Not all of the people just the idiots running things in those places now).

The Americas (Perhaps - Canada) prosperous from the Canadian border to the tip of South America.

I am thinking that it is possible.

As for Carbon in the Atmosphere, artificial wood from grass and Bamboo could pull it out of the atmosphere, and we can make structure for these new industries such as supports for solar panels from it.

My point is you don't kill your old industrial horse and then hope to get a new one.  You use all your horses and achieve a clean atmosphere faster.

Ending Pending smile

#7 Re: Not So Free Chat » Transportation Issues and the Development of Worlds. » 2026-09-16 18:19:44

So, yes, the idea of a sand battery for low gravity worlds.  As an alternative to pyramids as I previously mentioned.

On the Moon "Sand" must be extracted from regolith as a certain size, I suppose.  In its natural state it will likely be jagged and not rounded.

The Moon is not generous in gasses to use in it if a gas were to be used.  Water Vapor, Oxygen, and maybe CO2.  I think it might be worthwhile to import Carbon to create CO2.

So, how does a sand bath work in low G?

I suppose that what I am thinking of is only a bit like a sand bath: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sand_bath

In the ones I am familiar with the sand can be fluidized by flowing air up though it.  Quite hot possibly.

The Sand Battery is also something like what I am after: https://www.howtogosolar.org/sand-battery/

The Finns have been working on such: https://polarnightenergy.com/sand-battery/

I believe that they may heat with electricity.  I want to heat with direct or indirect solar, a Laser Beam, or Microwaves.

I am imagining "Sand" that moves, circulates from a point of heating to a point of storage, and then the means to make use of the heat as it leaks or by drawing it off from the sand battery.

I am anticipating low gravity as an advantage to fluidize sand so that it can flow.  Vibrations, a gas or perhaps a type of venturi pump may facilitate it.

I also see an advantage on the Moon of vacuum.  After all Thermos Bottles can hold heat of hot Coffee rather well.

I am also considering if it is possible to store energy in "Sand" and at the same time block radiation from shelters for humans.  That may be possible.

I think I will sleep on it.

I do think that massive sized "Sand Batteries" on the Moon could be very useful for places where the nights are very long, especially.

Ending Pending :=)

#8 Re: Not So Free Chat » Transportation Issues and the Development of Worlds. » 2026-09-16 15:36:05

So, the idea of a solar heated sand battery. 

I guess these could be particle flow only, or might be pressurized with Oxygen, CO2, or Water.

An interesting aspect of this would be that you could insulate these like a thermos bottle with curtain like blankets.  So, you could reduce thermal losses.  This likely would reduce electric output if Infrared Solar Panels are the method of electrical source.  But you could choose as you might like.

The method of heating might be direct solar to sand in the case of a particle only system, or perhaps a gas pressurized drum.  A gas pressurized drum might be only of metal or perhaps have transparent windows.  But I do not know if any transparent window can deal with very high temperatures.

Ending Pending :-)

#9 Re: Not So Free Chat » Peter Zeihan again: and also other thinkers: » 2026-09-16 10:18:42

I guess I can be an "Other Thinker".

There is something I want to expose in this post elsewhere: https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 56#p241556

Quote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>

I am coming to the conclusion that people achieve wealth either by appointment to it or by being useful to a productive task.

Most Communists, Monarchists, and some religious institutions, and Universities, are more towards wealth by appointment.  In order for an Unworthy person to have wealth appointed to them, first the wealth has to be taken from the people that it can be taken from, typically a Monarch is a taker, but also Stalin, Lenin, Mao, etc. were very similar to royal taking.

However not every taker is a scoundrel.  Those who are in such a system that are more worthy might assist a "Maker" such as Elon Musk in creating Wealth.  That could happen in a university, for instance, even though I think that mostly they are "Takers".

DEI is an example of the appointed "Taker".

>>>>>>>>>>>

I believe that this can be used in seeing societies as being ordered by contraction/extraction or expansion/creation.

I will argue that some parts of the MAGA movement are of the expansion/creation nature, and that much of the rest of the world is of the contraction/extraction nature.  It is very simply a situation where a part of a society in hierarchy becomes cannibalistic in that it feeds on the other parts, and does not create an offsetting benefit for that other part that they extract from.

While Communists have claimed that the Capitalists are the cannibals, it is to be noticed that the major thing they want to do is seize the means of production.  So, I consider them to be the same thing as kings and dictators.

A king could be benevolent and useful, but they certainly can be cannibalistic in their behaviors.

I think a root of this problem is the adoration of verbal skills and the ability to manipulate the direction and magnitude of violence.

The Verbal and Violent, if allowed will consume all other talents to the point of destruction of a society or for a society to become as a prison camp.

This is why I will turn my back on all Globalist Thinking and favor MAGA as one possible treatment for the problem of the Verbal and Violent.

A society that has been excessively modified by the Verbal and Violent will be very poor.  I believe I see examples of this in the Middle East.

Without having secured oil wealth by Verbal and Violent means these people would be completely in poverty.  I expect that their genome has been severely damaged by allowing a culture of lust and greed determine who will breed.  This then will displace other talents than Verbal and Violent ones.  I do not blame them as especially evil, but rather that they have a very old civilization which is like a zombie.  Seeking fresh cultures to violate and do the same damage to.

I see the British as pandering to this process at the expense of new cultures, which I hold against them.  It is a sort of Judas move.

Ending Pending smile

#10 Re: Not So Free Chat » Transportation Issues and the Development of Worlds. » 2026-09-16 09:59:18

A factor in having a body of heated materials is that the heat itself might be useful to protect humans and equipment.

While I understand that nuclear will have an initial place on the Moon, and other worlds, solar is a resource worth seeking uses for.
If you did have a battery system, then you could assure keeping the batteries warm all the time with an association with a thermal pyramid.
Sodium and Aluminum, maybe Iron may be possible for batteries.

The Moons Peaks of Eternal Light (Not quite eternal), seem like one of the best places to utilize Sun Chasing Heliostats.
Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
A night at a lunar peak of eternal light lasts about 14 Earth days.

On the Moon, a full day-night cycle is roughly 29.5 Earth days long because of its slow rotation. At a peak of eternal light — a high-latitude, high-elevation site near the Moon’s poles that receives sunlight for most of the year — the Sun remains above the horizon for a very long time. This means the night side of the Moon is visible for only a fraction of the total cycle.

Because the Moon’s rotation is so slow, the night at a PEL is essentially the same length as the lunar night at the equator: 14 Earth days
IMDb
IMDb
. This is because the Moon’s rotation period is about twice the length of its orbital period, so each point on its surface experiences 14 days of daylight followed by 14 days of darkness.

Key points:

Lunar day/night cycle: ~29.5 Earth days total.

Night at a PEL: ~14 Earth days (same as anywhere on the Moon).

Day at a PEL: ~14 Earth days of near-constant sunlight.

Why it’s “eternal” light: The Moon’s small axial tilt (~1.5°) and high elevation at the PEL keep the Sun above the horizon for most of the year, but the night still occurs for half the rotation
grokipedia.com
grokipedia.com
+1
.

So, while a PEL is a prime candidate for solar-powered lunar outposts, it still experiences a 14-day lunar night each year.

On the Earth a Sun Chasing Heliostat would have to move between East to West over a day's length and them back again in the night.
So, a 24 hour cycle. 

But the Moon, 29.5 days may make more sense for mobile Heliostats.

The Heliostats might have wheels on themselves, or perhaps more efficiently wheeled robots would pick them up periodically and move them to appropriate locations around the collection tower/pyramid, in accordance to the position of the sun over a month long period.

Unlike Earth and Mars, Moon Polar Sunlight at the peaks is clockwork in nature and not expected to be affected by weather.

Where objects like this might be moved around on a continuous basis, I expect that the ground would have been treated so as to remove the dust that might be scattered about by the moving process.

Ending Pending :-)

#11 Re: Not So Free Chat » Transportation Issues and the Development of Worlds. » 2026-09-15 08:58:09

I have another version of a Heliostat Heated Pyramid: F6vdAw9.jpg

At the top of a shaft is a heated "Bucket" into which you put Sand/Regolith/Pellets.  The materials are heated.  Materials are removed from the bottom of the shaft and dumped into the "Heated Bucket" repeatedly.

So, this is a method to use a fluidized flow of fluidized particles.

This I think could work on the Earth, Moon, Mars, Mercury, other worlds.

Post #11 has materials about Infrared Solar Panels.  It is my intention that the dark brown casing of the pyramid will be such.

This video also will suggest how a layer of strained Silicon and such infrared solar panels could harness the heat put into such a pyramid:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inoFpSyrPCc
Quote:

America's New Energy Breakthrough Is Shocking Everyone — Engineers Are Calling It Impossible

I will pause to review it again myself.................

The fluid is of particles, a Hourglass may demonstrate a similar process to what is in my drawing: https://www.bing.com/images/search?view … ajaxserp=0 Image Quote:  OIP.6zionP9Nh6Fe_l2najxvUQHaHa?w=213&h=213&c=7&r=0&o=7&dpr=1.3&pid=1.7&rm=3

So, not exactly the same process but similar.

Fluidization of "Sand" could be assisted by vibrations.  Both Earth and Mars have wind created sand dunes.  Such sand is not suitable for concrete, as the particles are rounded, but may work very well for this purpose.

On the Moon sieves might be used to extract a suitable quantity of proper sized particles for this use.  Also, it is possible that pellets could be manufactured for the purpose.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taconite
Image Quote: 1280px-TaconitePellet.JPG?utm_source=en.wikipedia.org&utm_campaign=imageinfo&utm_content=thumbnail

Pellets might jam up, but they might be considered, of a certain size.  Sand might be possible to vacuum up into the heating bucket from the base of the device.

So, if the infrared solar panels can be made, they will be relatively protected from weather conditions, such as UV light, impactors.  Although I don't know if they will be harmed by hail on  Earth.

The only electricity to power this device is for the Heliostats and also for the method of materials return from the bottom of the column to the top where the heating bucket is.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_power_tower
Quote:

Solar power tower

Image Quote: 960px-Brigthsource_Tower_Ashalim.jpg?utm_source=en.wikipedia.org&utm_campaign=imageinfo&utm_content=thumbnail

So, then add a pyramid.  This may require that the heliostats be in modified locations, but it should be workable.

On the Moon, the interior of the pyramid may be of slag blocks with spacers.
On Mars the abundant clay may fill the interior, but it might be good to put cast basalt piping in that material to allow for forced heat flow from the interior to the outside.

On Earth, various options may be practical.

Perhaps you could use Carbon Blocks if you could keep Oxygen away from the Carbon.  It might be a good way to sequester Carbon., and Coal Deposits will be worth some actual value.

Perhaps the Carbon Blocks could be wrapped in some kind of fire proof material.

I think that this has great potential.

These might be distributed in the countryside to provide charging for electric vehicles on any world.


Ending Pending :-)

#12 Re: Human missions » space x going to the moon instead of mars » 2026-09-15 07:49:39

One thing the Moon offers more than the ISS does is additional mass to build recycling methods with.

Query: "What Hydrogen containing compounds does the ISS dump overboard?"
Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
The International Space Station (ISS) does not “dump” hydrogen-containing compounds overboard in the way it handles water or carbon dioxide. Instead, hydrogen is a byproduct of oxygen generation and is either vented to space or recycled.

When the ISS produces oxygen, it uses electrolysis of water in its Oxygen Generation Assembly (OGA) and Elektron system. This process splits water (H₂O) into oxygen gas (O₂) and hydrogen gas (H₂)
issmonitor.com
issmonitor.com
. The oxygen is released into the cabin for breathing, while the hydrogen is not used for crew needs and is typically vented overboard to maintain safe cabin gas composition
issmonitor.com
issmonitor.com
.

In some cases, hydrogen can also be used in the Sabatier reactor to combine with carbon dioxide (CO₂) from the Carbon Dioxide Removal Assembly (CDRA) to produce water and methane, recovering more water for reuse
issmonitor.com
issmonitor.com
. If not used in Sabatier, excess hydrogen is vented.

Key points:

Hydrogen-containing compound dumped: Primarily hydrogen gas (H₂) from water electrolysis.

Source: Electrolysis of recycled water (from urine, sweat, and cabin condensate).

Fate: Vented to space; not released as a liquid or other compound.

No other hydrogen-containing compounds (like methane or water vapor) are intentionally dumped overboard — any such gases are either reused or part of closed-loop recycling.

So, the ISS “dumps” hydrogen gas (H₂) overboard when it is not needed for Sabatier processing, as part of its closed-loop life support system
issmonitor.com
issmonitor.com
.
Wikipedia
Wikipedia

So, on the Moon it would be sensible to roast regolith in hot Hydrogen, to extract Oxygen and to create reduced Iron.

So, you would not dump Hydrogen or Hydrogen compounds to the surface of the Moon except for some kind of exception that I am not aware of.  Maybe by mistake or system brakedown.

I recall that https://www.youtube.com/@Anthrofuturism expresses the opinion that just heating regolith will produce Hydrogen/water, in small quantities.  If you reuse the Hydrogen to do further roasting the Hydrogen accumulates  Even without waster from the poles. 

Carbon is not the same way.  You would lose some Carbon to the regolith each time you used it, but Hydrogen will accumulate.

So, actually it may be that recycling efficiencies will be close to 100% and that in fact you might get more back than you started with even without water ice from the poles.  There have also been found water in glass beads.

Query: "How Much water does the Moon have in water ice and in glass beads?"

Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
Water on the Moon: Ice and Glass Bead Stores
Recent research shows the Moon holds billions of tons of water in two main forms: water ice in permanently shadowed craters and water trapped in microscopic glass beads in the regolith.

1. Water ice in shadowed craters
Permanently shadowed regions at the Moon’s poles contain water ice mixed into the regolith, sometimes in small chunks less than 10 cm across. These ice deposits are not pure sheets but are embedded in dust and minerals. While the exact total mass of these ice reservoirs is still being mapped, they are known to be significant and are a major target for future lunar missions
Wikipedia
Wikipedia
.

2. Water in glass beads
A 2023 study of lunar samples from China’s Chang’e-5 mission revealed that microscopic impact glass beads in the soil can store water. Each bead can hold up to 2,000 micrograms (0.002 g) of water per gram of bead mass
ScienceAlert
ScienceAlert
+1
.
Scientists estimate that all such glass beads on the Moon could contain up to 270–300 billion tons (297.6–300 billion metric tons) of water
ScienceAlert
ScienceAlert
+1
. This water is thought to form when solar wind hydrogen ions bond with oxygen in the lunar soil, and the beads act as a reservoir, accumulating water in just a few years
ScienceAlert
ScienceAlert
+1
.

Summary of estimated totals

Ice in shadowed craters: Exact global mass not yet fully quantified, but confirmed in multiple polar locations.

Glass bead water: ~270–300 billion tons globally, based on Chang’e-5 sample analysis
ScienceAlert
ScienceAlert
+1
.

Why it matters
Both ice and glass bead water are potential resources for in-situ resource utilization — extracting oxygen, drinking water, and fuel for future lunar bases. The glass bead reservoir is especially important because it is widespread and accessible across the Moon’s surface, not just at the poles


Disputed!

This contrasts sharply with the estimate given by a source in the previous post #35, Quote:

How Much Water Is On The Moon?
Researchers estimate about 34 million tons of water exist on the moon. However they also noted this estimate might be "low" and used a 1 billion ton baseline to make their predictions.

Their estimate of ice may be low and they do not seem to include estimates for water/Hydrogen in the regolith/beads.

This also does not consider the possibility that the Moon may have deep water that is reachable, or that water could be imported if it was valuable enough in its results on the Moon.


>>>>>>>>>>>>

I am coming to the conclusion that people achieve wealth either by appointment to it or by being useful to a productive task.

Most Communists, Monarchists, and some religious institutions, and Universities, are more towards wealth by appointment.  In order for an Unworthy person to have wealth appointed to them, first the wealth has to be taken from the people that it can be taken from, typically a Monarch is a taker, but also Stalin, Lenin, Mao, etc. were very similar to royal taking.

However not every taker is a scoundrel.  Those who are in such a system that are more worthy might assist a "Maker" such as Elon Musk in creating Wealth.  That could happen in a university, for instance, even though I think that mostly they are "Takers".

DEI is an example of the appointed "Taker".

>>>>>>>>>>>

As for the Moon a population of just 5000 would be just fine, especially if they had a gene bank for backup.

But until we can deal with health issues, I don't think we can even consider permanent inhabitants for the Moon.  Going to the Moon and staying there may allow us to find a way to keep people healthy on the Moon.

It should be considered possible that 99.9999% of the animation/actuation on the Moon will be done by Industrial/Robotic Systems.  Those may need far less water than humans do.

Ending Pending :-)

#13 Re: Not So Free Chat » Transportation Issues and the Development of Worlds. » 2026-09-14 18:11:41

I have thought further about this matter.  Such a Pyramid might have multiple shafts with robotic insulated doors, allowing the more effective distribution of heat into it from laser sources: wvG1HIs.jpg

From a Mountain Top or Crater Rim position, it might be possible to distribute power to such Pyramids.

And temperatures higher than 400 degrees C might be attainable, if the infrared solar panels and shocked/compressed Silicon of the casings can endure it.

Faceted Mirrors that the laser beams might impinge on might split the beams, allowing distribution of the heat between the blocks and sets of blocks that would make the interior of such a pyramid.  As I have said before, these blocks would probably have spacers between the blocks to allow radiant heat transfers withing the whole interior of the body of the Pyramid.

The doors that would allow the laser beams in would be robotic and operate in concert with the laser system source.  The doors could block heat from radiating out of the portals when closed.  However, if a transparency that can endure the laser beam becomes possible, then that also could block radiating of heat though the portals.

Electric vehicles might be charged at such Pyramids, and so may not have to climb up and down in elevation as much due to the electricity sourced in relatively accessible locations.

Such Pyramids might even be built in areas where the sun seldom or never shines.

Ending Pending :-)

#14 Re: Not So Free Chat » Transportation Issues and the Development of Worlds. » 2026-09-14 07:10:47

There is not just one company that does or will make electric vehicles, trucks and other vehicles.

I think that the Japan dream of a solar ring around the equator is a good concept, but rings at higher latitudes would be shorter.  Particularly nearer the poles, you have "Land" that may have more or less than average amounts of sunlight.

Linking "Peaks of Eternal Light" may be relatively easy.  Linked by roads and those roads linking "Sanctuaries" together.
https://wonderdome.co.uk/peaks-of-eternal-light-moon/
Image Quote: Eternal-light.jpg

So, you might have a "Ring" at a high latitude around each pole, and perhaps a road that links the two poles and at least one location for a mass driver system.  More than a ring, this might be a patchwork of solar + situations that are in a ring around each pole.

Lasers are considered a method to transmit power.  Typically, it is intended to shine them on a solar panel tuned to a specific wave length.

But a pyramid on the Moon with a portal with a door could receive energy donations from a Light + situation such as an "Eternal Peak".

Dn5nuPb.jpg

But the power goes solar>Electric>Laser Beam>Heat Storage inside the Pyramid.  So, probably more efficient to deliver heat than is Laser Beam>Solar>Electric.

So, this "Thermal Battery" will want advances in some infrared solar power technology.
https://www.damienfrearson.com/blog/har … lar-energy
Quote:

Harnessing Infrared Light: The Next Frontier in Solar Energy

Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
Infrared solar cells are advanced photovoltaic devices designed to capture infrared light, significantly increasing solar energy efficiency and enabling electricity generation even beyond visible sunlight.
What Are Infrared Solar Cells?
Infrared (IR) solar cells are designed to harvest energy from infrared light, which has longer wavelengths than visible light and is invisible to the human eye. Conventional solar panels primarily convert visible light into electricity, leaving a large portion of the sun’s energy untapped. Infrared light accounts for roughly half of the solar radiation reaching Earth, making it a substantial untapped energy source
damienfrearson.com
damienfrearson.com
+1
.

Key Technologies
Thermophotovoltaic (TPV) Cells
TPV cells convert heat and infrared radiation into electricity. Unlike traditional photovoltaic cells, TPVs can absorb infrared heat, allowing energy generation even after sunset or from heat emitted by the Earth
damienfrearson.com
damienfrearson.com
+1
.
Quantum Dots
Quantum dots are nanoscale semiconductor particles that can absorb specific wavelengths, including infrared. Integrating quantum dots into solar panels expands the absorption spectrum, enabling panels to capture both visible and infrared light
damienfrearson.com
damienfrearson.com
.
Upconversion Technology
Upconversion converts low-energy infrared photons into higher-energy visible photons, which can then be absorbed by standard solar cells. This process effectively unlocks energy that would otherwise be wasted
damienfrearson.com
damienfrearson.com
+1
.
Thermo-Radiative Diodes
Experimental devices like thermo-radiative diodes exploit the temperature difference between the Earth and outer space to generate electricity from infrared emission at night, demonstrating potential for 24-hour energy generation
ScienceDaily
ScienceDaily
.
Advantages
Higher Energy Output: By capturing both visible and infrared light, solar panels can significantly increase electricity generation, potentially boosting efficiency by 20–25% or more
nextbigfuture.com
nextbigfuture.com
.
Night-Time Energy Generation: TPV and thermo-radiative technologies allow energy production after sunset, reducing reliance on batteries or grid power
damienfrearson.com
damienfrearson.com
+1
.
Enhanced Efficiency in Low-Light Conditions: Infrared-sensitive materials can improve performance in cloudy or shaded environments
damienfrearson.com
damienfrearson.com
.
Challenges
Material Limitations: Many conventional photovoltaic materials are inefficient at converting infrared photons due to their lower energy, requiring specialized semiconductors or nanomaterials
Ars Technica
Ars Technica
+1
.
Optimization Needed: Technologies like quantum dots and upconversion layers are still under development, and efficiency gains depend on precise engineering of nanostructures and light concentrators
nextbigfuture.com
nextbigfuture.com
.
Future Outlook
Infrared solar cells represent a promising frontier in renewable energy. With ongoing research in nanomaterials, multi-junction semiconductors, and heat-to-electricity devices, these technologies could double the energy output of conventional solar panels and enable continuous electricity generation, even at night or in low-light conditions
damienfrearson.com
damienfrearson.com
+1
.
By integrating infrared harvesting into solar systems, the next generation of solar panels could become ultra-efficient, versatile, and capable of providing more reliable renewable energy.

If you had a chain of Energy Storage Pyramids perhaps lower down the Mountain Heights, electric vehicles might transit between them.

It may also be possible that solar power stations in the "L1" and "L2" locations might feed laser power into Energy Storage Pyramids at various locations on the Moon.  Aiming may be more tricky, but it may be possible.

I think that this and other factors such as robotics suggest that a very high level of development could be done on the Moon, making it a very valuable asset to the humans who are future reaching and not managers of human decline.

Ending Pending smile

#15 Re: Not So Free Chat » Transportation Issues and the Development of Worlds. » 2026-09-07 08:45:05

I wasn't going to post today, but stumbled on this: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … &FORM=VIRE
Quote:

Utube, Apollo Astronaut Harrison Schmitt: What We Found on the Moon Shouldn't Be There,
27:16

Apollo Astronaut Harrison Schmitt: What We Found on the Moon Shouldn't Be There
YouTube
Starmus
180.2K views

But I have also been thinking about the materials of Post #9 further: https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 13#p241413
Quote:

As a continuation of the previous post I have this crude drawing: t0Yz6VS.jpg

I am now wondering if there can be ways to heat the interior of this device directly with sunlight from Heliostats during the Lunar Day.

I feel that one of the strengths of such a system is that solar cells that work with infrared, may be more durable than solar cells directly in sunlight, exposed to UV and impactors.

I want to avoid the use of fluids for now and try to work with vacuum compatible methods.

So, the idea is to spill light off of a collection of heliostats on the Moons surface to heat a pile of slag blocks, and to allow the infrared from those heated blocks to produce electricity even during the night.

For now, the pile of slag blocks would be similar to a pyramid in the greater part.  Fiber Optic's could be suggested, but I would rather be more primitive than that.

OK, here is my first try: rsCRXzo.png

So, presuming heliostats with mirrors are easy on the Moon, and that the Moon makes them a bit simpler by hot having very pronounced seasons, perhaps concentrated light can be conveyed to the sphere inside the protective insulated shroud, some amount of the heat might travel into the pyramid by infared radiation.

The stacked slag blocks will have spacers so that "Vacuum Gaps" will allow the radiation to equilibrate over time into various locations in the Pyramid.

The dark brown casing, will inhibit the movement of infrared radiation out of the structure except that it passes through it by Phonons and the out of it into space as radiation.

In the night the protective shroud will have doors closed to reduce thermal losses though the collector mechanism.

If you have glass that will tolerate large thermal shock, then perhaps the doors will be windows.

A Heliostat that is east of a pyramid may also be west of the next one in a line about the equator or a longitude of the Moon.  But they also could be somewhat north or south of the Pyramids.

The heated bulb could be Stainless Steel, but higher temperatures might be suggested by the following:
Query: "Highest temperature metal that does not melt?"
Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
Highest-Temperature Metal That Doesn’t Melt
The highest melting point of any metal is tungsten, with a melting point of about 3,422°C (6,192°F) at standard pressure
biologyinsights.com
biologyinsights.com
+1
. This makes it the metal that “doesn’t melt” under normal industrial conditions — it can withstand extreme heat without liquefying, which is why it’s used in applications like aerospace components, light bulb filaments, and high-temperature furnaces
www.bridgeseahardware.com
www.bridgeseahardware.com
+1
.

Why Tungsten Resists Melting
Tungsten’s exceptional heat resistance comes from:

Strong metallic bonds between its atoms, requiring immense energy to break
www.bridgeseahardware.com
www.bridgeseahardware.com
.

High density (19.25g/cm³) and good thermal conductivity, which help dissipate heat and reduce the chance of reaching its melting point in many processes
luxmetalgroup.com
luxmetalgroup.com
.

Excellent resistance to creep (deformation under stress at high temperatures)
luxmetalgroup.com
luxmetalgroup.com
.

Other High-Temperature Metals
While tungsten holds the record, other refractory metals also have very high melting points:

Tantalum: ~3,017°C (5,463°F)
luxmetalgroup.com
luxmetalgroup.com
.

Molybdenum: ~2,623°C (4,753°F)
luxmetalgroup.com
luxmetalgroup.com
.

Chromium: ~2,170°C (3,938°F)
NeoNickel
NeoNickel
.

Beyond Metals
If you’re looking for materials that resist melting even more, ultra-high-temperature ceramics (UHTCs) can withstand temperatures above 3,000°C, but they are not metals
biologyinsights.com
biologyinsights.com
.

In summary: For metals, tungsten is the one that “doesn’t melt” — it’s the highest-temperature metal available, capable of enduring extreme heat without liquefying, making it indispensable in high-temperature engineering applications.

I expect to lose a lot of energy from the Heliostats, but feel that it may be relatively cheap to have a lot of heliostat mirror space.

Anyway, this is a first try.

I think it would be good to sleep on it and see if better could emerge.

Ending Pending :-)

In case I seem to be getting "Off Topic" realize that if you are going to travel on the Moon or between Earth and Moon, you need energy.

Ending Pending :-)

#16 Re: Not So Free Chat » Transportation Issues and the Development of Worlds. » 2026-09-06 10:39:10

As a continuation of the previous post I have this crude drawing: t0Yz6VS.jpg

As I think it might work on the Moon, you could have blocks of slag but put spacers between them to allow infrared flows.  They yellow arrows suggest pushing heat into the array of blocks using a Lasser or Microwave method.

The Dark Brown Casing is like an envelope which does not allow the heat out unless it flows through the casing which is thermoelectric as mentioned in previous posts.

The spacing of the blocks not only may allow infrared photons to bounce around in the gaps but a quicker heating and discharge of heat than conduction only would provide should the blocs not be spaced.

I of course have not depicted many of the non-cubic blocks in the diagram.

Ending Pending smile

#17 Re: Not So Free Chat » Transportation Issues and the Development of Worlds. » 2026-09-06 08:53:34

It appears that the intention of Tesla and SpaceX are converging.  But also, I wonder if the plans of Japan may be implemented in parallel to what these companies might do with the Moon.

https://dailygalaxy.com/2026/02/japan-p … ound-moon/
Quote:

Japan Plans to Create a Solar Ring Around the Moon to Power Earth for Eternity
Shimizu Corporation’s Luna Ring concept could transform global energy by harnessing the Moon’s solar power and beaming it back to Earth.

Image Quote: img_index_05.jpg.webp

Just including Tesla electric vehicles and robots with Japan robots and other tech and then SpaceX notions of a Mass Driver, I think movement could occur in all these directions.  And of course the Artimis grouping and the China/Russia grouping would have to be included as well.

All those efforts could make the Moon a part of the economies of Earth.

And I am wondering about this: "Can electron beams be used to accelerate payloads in space?"
Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
Using Electron Beams to Accelerate Payloads in Space
Yes — relativistic electron beams are being proposed as a long-range, high-efficiency method to accelerate spacecraft in space, with potential applications for interstellar missions.

How it works
Relativistic electron beams are streams of electrons accelerated to speeds close to the speed of light. In space, these beams can carry large amounts of kinetic energy over vast distances, potentially delivering it to a spacecraft via a beam-driven propulsion system
Gadgets 360
Gadgets 360
+1
. The idea is to generate the beam from a fixed-position “statite” near the Sun, which can be powered by sunlight, and then transmit the beam to a probe in deep space
arXiv.org
arXiv.org
+1
.

Advantages over other beam methods
Longer range: Relativistic electron beams can propagate over hundreds or thousands of astronomical units (AU), far beyond the ~0.1 AU range of laser or microwave sails like Breakthrough Starshot
arXiv.org
arXiv.org
+1
.

Lower power requirements: Because the beam can be focused over greater distances, the transmitter can accelerate the payload more gradually, reducing peak power needs
arXiv.org
arXiv.org
.

High energy transfer: Electrons at relativistic speeds carry immense kinetic energy, enabling probes to reach significant fractions of light speed — e.g., ~10% c for a 1,000kg probe, cutting travel time to Alpha Centauri to about 40 years
Gadgets 360
Gadgets 360
+1
.
Key physics
At relativistic speeds, the relativistic pinch effect — where the beam’s interaction with ionized space plasma creates a self-focusing magnetic field — can help maintain beam integrity over long distances
Gadgets 360
Gadgets 360
+1
. This is a major advantage over photons, which spread out due to diffraction.

Challenges
Beam focusing and stability: Maintaining a tight, coherent beam over interstellar distances is difficult; space plasma and magnetic fields can distort it
rockymountaindispatch.com
rockymountaindispatch.com
.

Energy conversion: The spacecraft must efficiently absorb and convert the beam’s energy into thrust or reaction mass
rockymountaindispatch.com
rockymountaindispatch.com
.

Transmitter infrastructure: A large, stable, and power-hungry beam source near the Sun is required
Gadgets 360
Gadgets 360
+1
.

Deflection by magnetic fields: Interstellar and solar magnetic fields could alter the beam’s path
rockymountaindispatch.com
rockymountaindispatch.com
.
Outlook
While still in the conceptual and simulation phase, relativistic electron beam propulsion is seen as a promising candidate for interstellar-scale missions. It could enable faster, more cost-effective acceleration of payloads than current beam-powered concepts, provided the technical hurdles of beam control and energy conversion are overcome
arXiv.org
arXiv.org
+2
.

In short, electron beams can be used to accelerate payloads in space, especially for long-range missions, but they require advanced space-based infrastructure and beam control technologies to be practical.

Could electron beams from the Equator of the Moon be used to influence the orbits of objects/payloads?

The distances would be much shorter so the methods could be a bit different.

And I wonder if we could create energy storage devices that would be helpful during the Lunar night.

Processing regolith, probably using some heat, some parts may be extracted and the remainder, a Slag, might be cast into blocks which might be made to compose Pyramid like structures.

If you have vacancy channels in the structure you might heat the structure with Lasers or Microwaves.  If it is hot then it might be used to generate electrical power.  400 degrees C might be a good target.

Previously, elsewhere I have discussed a possible way to extract energy from such a "Pyramid": https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 56#p241356
"Index» Terraformation» Orbital Platforms"
Post #13 deals in part with this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inoFpSyrPCc
Quote:

America's New Energy Breakthrough Is Shocking Everyone — Engineers Are Calling It Impossible

Frontier America and 2 more

It may also be possible to heat the Pyramids with a fluid flowing though internal piping, but that is going to be some greater amount of trouble.  Imported Carbon could allow Carbon Dioxide as a working fluid, or perhaps a metal such as might be used in a nuclear reactor might work.  Perhaps a metal like Sodium.

The easier thing though if solar power is to beam power to Earth using Microwaves and Lasers would be to pump heat into the pyramids by passing energy into provided channels in the blocks of Slag that might be what the interior of the Pyramid would be composed of.

Quaise has a drilling method that if modified might be suitable.
https://geothermalinsider.com/learn/quaise-energy/
Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
Quaise Drilling Method Explained
Quaise Energy’s drilling method is a hybrid approach combining conventional rotary drilling with high‑power millimeter‑wave (MMW) ablation to reach superhot rock (over 300°C / 572°F) at depths beyond the reach of standard geothermal drilling
geothermalinsider.com
geothermalinsider.com
+1
.

How it works

Initial stage – Conventional rotary drilling
The process starts like traditional oil/gas drilling: a rotary bit cuts through softer rock to reach the basement layer of the Earth’s crust, where hard, hot granite or basalt lies
www.quaise.com
www.quaise.com
.

Second stage – Millimeter‑wave ablation
Once basement rock is reached, the system switches to millimeter‑wave technology. A gyrotron on the surface generates high‑power MMW beams that are guided through tubing to the drill point. These waves vaporize rock without mechanical contact, eliminating the need for downhole bits or cutting tools
geothermalinsider.com
geothermalinsider.com
+2
.

The vaporized rock is carried back to the surface by gas flow.

This method is designed to drill “perfectly clean” holes through some of the hardest rocks on Earth in record time
www.quaise.com
www.quaise.com
.

Key advantages

No mechanical wear from hard rock, reducing downtime and maintenance.

Access to superhot rock (≥300°C) at depths where conventional drilling becomes economically unviable
geothermalinsider.com
geothermalinsider.com
+1
.

Scalable for large‑scale geothermal plants like Quaise’s Project Obsidian, aiming for 250MW output by 2030
www.quaise.com
www.quaise.com
.

Demonstrations and milestones

First field test in July 2025 drilled 118m in Texas granite, with Quaise targeting ~1km depth
geothermalinsider.com
geothermalinsider.com
.

A July 2025 milestone reached 100m in Central Texas, marking the first real‑world application of MMW drilling
www.quaise.com
www.quaise.com
.

The technology is still in development; Quaise plans to upgrade gyrotrons to 10× more power for deeper penetration
www.quaise.com
www.quaise.com
.

Why it matters
By enabling access to the largest untapped geothermal resource — the “true geothermal” at 2–12 miles depth — Quaise’s method could unlock multi‑terawatt clean energy globally, potentially rivaling fossil fuels in scale and reliability
SciTechDaily
SciTechDaily
+1
.

In short, Quaise’s drilling method is a fusion‑inspired, hybrid system: conventional drilling to basement rock, then MMW ablation to melt through it, opening the door to ultra‑deep, superhot geothermal energy.

While the idea of a solar ring around the equator of the Moon is very interesting, it implies conducting electricity from the day side of the Moon to the night side.  It could be interruptible by a impactor, or a malicious entity.

Pyramid Batteries, may be useful and may be functional way before the whole ring is created.

And if power is to be there why not also put data bases on the Moon?

SpaceX wants a Mass Driver and Sun Synchronous Satellites, which is fine, but why not also build AI on the Moon?

Thermophotovoltaic panels as the casing of the Pyramids, and under that Strained Silicon with a pinch of Aluminum might be practical on the Moon.

Ending Pending smile

#18 Re: Terraformation » Orbital Platforms » 2026-09-05 19:29:55

Continuing with the theme of the previous few posts.......

I am presuming that this is approximately what a shell or set of shells should need to provide.
Query: "How much regolith is needed on the Moon for radiation protection?"
Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
Regolith Thickness Needed for Radiation Protection on the Moon
For long-term human presence on the Moon, lunar regolith is a key in-situ resource for radiation shielding, but the amount needed depends on the type of radiation and mission duration.

Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCRs)

NASA and Johns Hopkins University studies using the OLTARIS tool show that at least 2 meters of regolith is required to reduce exposure to acceptable levels for a permanent base
ResearchGate
ResearchGate
.

At 2m depth, exposure is about 150mSv per 180‑day mission; increasing to 3m reduces this to ~100mSv
ResearchGate
ResearchGate
.

There is a peak in secondary radiation dose between 1.0–1.5m, so optimal shielding often lies beyond that range
ResearchGate
ResearchGate
.

Solar Particle Events (SPEs)

Regolith is highly effective against SPEs, with protection improving with depth
ResearchGate
ResearchGate
.

For short-term storm shelters, lighter regolith layers (e.g., 0.5–1m) can be sufficient for emergency protection
sentinelmission.org
sentinelmission.org
.
Design strategies

Permanent bases often use thick regolith layers (2–3m) around sleeping and medical areas, sometimes combined with other materials like polyethylene or aluminum for mixed shielding
ResearchGate
ResearchGate
.

Underground habitats or lava tubes can further reduce required regolith thickness by using natural overburden
MDPI
MDPI
+1
.

Mixed crews can stay safely on the surface if total effective dose is kept below career limits (e.g., ~600mSv)
ResearchGate
ResearchGate
.

Practical considerations

Regolith is cost-effective compared to launching shielding from Earth, potentially saving billions in mission costs
ResearchGate
ResearchGate
.

Compressed regolith can provide both radiation and thermal insulation, reducing energy needs for habitat climate control
MDPI
MDPI
.

Secondary radiation (neutrons, gamma rays) must be accounted for in dose calculations, especially at intermediate depths
ResearchGate
ResearchGate
.
Summary table:

Radiation Type    Recommended Regolith Depth   
Approx. Dose Reduction

GCRs (permanent base)    2–3m   
~100–150mSv/180d

SPEs (emergency)    0.5–1m   
High protection

Underground (lava tube)    0–1m   
Very high protection

Bottom line: For a permanent lunar base, 2–3m of regolith is a common engineering target for GCR protection, with SPE protection achievable at shallower depths. Combining regolith with other materials or using natural overburden can optimize both radiation and thermal performance.

I am thinking that a "Long Sleeve" could be built of interlocking blocks resembling puzzle pieces, and that the cylinder or other shape might be wrapped in tensile materials like tensile metal bands or Carbon netting.

A serpentine or Helical tube shape might be possible.
https://www.dreamstime.com/serpentine-f … e276310057
Image Quote: serpentine-form-spiral-sketch-vector-illustration-decorative-ribbon-holiday-decoration-cute-curl-doodle-style-276310057.jpg?w=576

Having one or two ends open might allow infrared to drain out, but present an interrupted path for harmful raditation.

This is just a very quick doodle and only partially drawn as practical.  (Flat walls holding a differential pressure as shown are not practical)

kydItkl.png

A double shell of materials sintered shelters a metal rotating habitation cylinder.  The "Sleeve" is not long in the picture as per lack of space.

The gap between the two sintered walls is likely not pressurized, but with some work perhaps some of it could be.

I think that this could be a fair amount of fun as a lot of creativity might be innate in these fundamental structure options.

Ending Pending smile

#19 Re: Terraformation » Orbital Platforms » 2026-09-05 13:37:36

Referring to the previous two posts, it is hard to reconcile "Long Sleeve" which might host human activity from those that might be a sort of power supply.

gMcpMjN.png

So, a linear version could have segmentation for the two uses or parallel "Long Sleeves".

I desire to continue to see this as a very open archetecture.

Parallel Long Sleeves would give mutual protection each to each other, with the one in the center the most protected.  The outer parallels might have internal temperatures 100, 200, 400 C.

If there are Parallel sections then the parts in the center protecting humans does not have to do as much of the work of protection.

Generally, I do not see these things as being pressurized, but "Never say Never".

These structures might primarily be composed of excess amounts of Calcium Oxides and Silicon Oxides and any other scrap materials.

I feel this set of notions may work well for the materials of the moons of Mars.

Then later perhaps in the Asteroid Belts.


Ending Pending smile

#20 Re: Terraformation » Orbital Platforms » 2026-09-05 11:28:51

Referring to the "Long Sleeve" idea in post #18, could be very long, or in the form of a Toroid or figure 8.  Various ways to use Slag materials to build a protective platform.

You could make it serpentine for instance rather than strait linear.

Although in a straight line or serpentine "Long Sleeve", there are openings at two ends, there is no reason why ports could be passing though the walls of the device at intervals.

If you made one that was several km long, most of the interior would be very protected from the raw space environment.  So, you could hang various things like solar panels and mirrors on the outside of the "Long Sleeve".

Objects like Phobos, Deimos, and asteroids may relatively easily provide "Waste" materials to make a "Long Sleeve" from.


Ending Pending smile

#21 Re: Science, Technology, and Astronomy » Physics Topics » 2026-09-05 10:41:50

I guess I might use this (th), or you can move this post as you wish: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … &FORM=VIRE Quote:

America's New Invention Could Replace Iron Forever
YouTube
Hidden Globe
2K views

I do understand that this is "Tooting America's Horn".

Usually these claims are about China.  I value what China and others invent, but this video has quite a few new important items!

Adding a substance "Cerium" to Aluminum, raises the melting point quite a lot it seems, that is one.
Cerium seems to be a byproduct of obtaining "Rare Earths".

There are several items like that in this video.

Ending Pending :-)

#22 Re: Terraformation » Orbital Platforms » 2026-09-05 10:22:03

Here, I am trying to introduce the idea of a "Long Sleeve Protection Method": QPm9rcM.jpg

So, when building space habitats, there is bound to be a certain amount of materials that are "Tailings" or "Slag".

I am hoping that this is a useful way to utilize them.

The Brown in the drawing is intended to be a cylinder largely composed of sintered "Tailings or Slag".

Even if you eliminated sections #5, the sections 1, 2, 3, are having some large amount of protection from the raw space environment (Grey).

While the sintered tube, gives radiation protection and also impactor protection, it is partial but useful.  I have not included the means to make the radiation protection more complete as that would be various options.

If it is possible to put infrared photon panels on the surfaces of the "Long Sleeve", you might store heat in it.

From post #16, quote:

The casing then to be the mentioned Strain Cast Silica (With a pinch of Aluminum) then also covered by Thermophotovoltaic panels.

So, the heat stored leaking out slowly might serve as a battery.

Although the "Long Sleeve" could be made rotating, I instead imagine having many "Long Sleeves" interconnected into very large platforms.

I do not consider this to be well formed yet, but as a idea to stimulate new thinking.  So, I have not strongly defined it.

An object like Phobos or Deimos, might have materials processed to extract certain metals and Oxygen, maybe Carbon if there is any.  Then a "Long Sleeve" might be sintered from the Tailings/Slag, and would offer some "First Line" protection.

Ending Pending :-)

#23 Re: Terraformation » Orbital Platforms » 2026-09-05 09:05:57

There already exists a idea that is similar but operates at a higher temperature: Query: "Solar Storage with Hot Carbon"
Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
Solar Storage with Hot Carbon: How It Works and Why It Matters
Hot carbon-based thermal batteries can store solar (and other renewable) energy as intense heat in solid carbon blocks, then convert it back to electricity or process heat with high efficiency and low cost.

Core Concept
These systems use carbon blocks heated to extreme temperatures — often 1,500–4,350°F (1,900–2,400°C) — to store energy. The heat is generated by running excess electricity (e.g., from solar farms) through resistive elements or by using molten metals to transfer heat into the carbon
MIT News
MIT News
+1
. The carbon remains solid at these temperatures, making it durable and easy to handle.

Energy Conversion
The stored heat is then converted back to electricity using thermophotovoltaic (TPV) cells, which are tuned to capture the intense infrared and visible light emitted by the hot carbon. TPV cells function like solar cells but are optimized for high-temperature radiation, with recent demonstrations exceeding 40% efficiency
MIT News
MIT News
+1
. This allows the system to output electricity for 10 to over 100 hours at a fraction of the cost of lithium-ion batteries.

Key Advantages
Ultra-low cost: Carbon blocks are cheap, abundant, and non-toxic, with material costs around $1/kWh — about 50× cheaper than lithium-ion
New Atlas
New Atlas
.

High volumetric energy density: Solid carbon can absorb and store large amounts of energy in a compact form.

Long-duration storage: Ideal for grid-scale applications where batteries alone can’t meet demand for days.

Dual output: Can deliver both electricity and high-temperature industrial heat (up to ~2,000°C)
New Atlas
New Atlas
.

Scalable and modular: Systems can be containerized and deployed in large numbers.

Examples in Development
Fourth Power (MIT spinout): Uses molten tin to carry heat into carbon blocks, then TPV cells to convert light to electricity. Operates at record temperatures, aiming to cut balance-of-system costs
MIT News
MIT News
+1
.

Antora Energy: Focuses on carbon-based thermal batteries for zero-carbon heat and power, targeting heavy industry decarbonization
New Atlas
New Atlas
.

Applications
Grid storage: Storing solar surplus for use during low-generation periods.

Industrial process heat: Supplying heat for manufacturing, refining, and chemical processes.

Data centers and other high-load facilities: Providing backup or peak-shaving power.

Outlook
Hot carbon thermal batteries represent a promising long-duration, low-cost solution for integrating solar and other renewables into the grid and decarbonizing industries. With ongoing R&D, they could become a mainstream alternative to pumped hydro and lithium-ion storage, especially where cost, scalability, and long-duration capability are critical

https://cleantechnica.com/2025/11/11/gi … sil-fuels/
Quote:

Giant Blocks Of Steaming Hot Carbon Are Coming For Your Fossil Fuels

So, indeed those are good.  But it needs Carbon and very high temperatures.

For the Moon, Carbon is not available on the Moon, and for Mars, Clay is super abundant.

Also, I think the Carbon storage is relatively short term storage, and probably not that much help in a global dust storm.

For Earth?  Well most of the land is already used for something, and we do not have global dust storms or a 2 week Lunar night.

Ending Pending :-)

If stony asteroids are processed that are in elliptical sun orbits, the "Tailings" might be useful to incorporate into a thermal storage system.  This would allow the storage of energy when closer to the sun and the discharge of energy throughout the sun orbit.

Ending Pending :-)

#24 Re: Terraformation » Orbital Platforms » 2026-09-04 20:43:48

For the Moon a pyramid with the special solar panels mentioned in previous posts, might be composed of sintered blocks.

The casing then to be the mentioned Strain Cast Silica (With a pinch of Aluminum) then also covered by Thermophotovoltaic panels.

A way to inject heat into the mass might be related to drilling geothermal by Quaise.  So, you might modify their drilling method to heat the Sintered mass.  https://www.quaise.com/

Even if the original energy source were nuclear, you could stuff some energy into this pyramid so that the Pyramid would give a source of electricity, even in the Lunar night and even if other energy sources have failed.

But I do think that alternate sources of energy might be solar on the surface of the Moon, and also microwaved or laser delivered power from orbits.

So, I think that may have value on the Moon.

Ending Pending :-)

#25 Re: Terraformation » Bipolar Mars Terraform Plan » 2026-09-04 10:25:43

Pyramid Batteries on Mars.

In another topic I have been working on this: https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 63#p241363
"Index» Terraformation» Orbital Platforms" Post #14.

I feel I see an opportunity for Mars in this.  Mars has lots of clays it seems and it is said that you can compress the soil into a brick-like object.

Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
Compressing Martian Soil into Bricks
Scientists have shown that Martian soil (regolith) can be turned into bricks simply by compacting it under high pressure, without needing heat, additives, or complex chemistry
ScienceAlert
ScienceAlert
+1
.

How it works
Researchers at the University of California San Diego used a Mars-1a simulant — a material mimicking the composition of Martian soil — and found it was self-cohesive due to nanoparticulate iron oxide. This iron oxide coats larger basalt particles, creating flat facets that bond together under pressure
ScienceAlert
ScienceAlert
+1
.

The process
Enclose the soil in a flexible container (e.g., a rubber tube)
ScienceDaily
ScienceDaily
+1
.

Apply high pressure — roughly equivalent to dropping a 10‑lb hammer from 1 meter — to compact it
ScienceDaily
ScienceDaily
+1
.

The compacted material forms small round “pallets” about 1 inch tall, which can be cut into brick shapes
ScienceDaily
ScienceDaily
.

No baking or oven is required, and no extra binding agents are needed — the iron oxide in the soil acts as its own binder
ScienceDaily
ScienceDaily
.

Strength
The resulting bricks are stronger than steel‑reinforced concrete even without rebar
ScienceAlert
ScienceAlert
+1
. This makes them a promising candidate for in‑situ construction on Mars, reducing the need to transport heavy building materials from Earth.

Other approaches
While the UC San Diego method is simple and additive‑free, other research has explored mixed binders:

StarCrete: Combines Martian regolith with potato starch and salt to make bricks up to 72 MPa in strength — more than twice that of ordinary concrete
Astronomy Magazine
Astronomy Magazine
.

These starch‑based bricks could be produced from food waste, offering a dual benefit of construction and nutrition for astronauts.

Implications
In‑situ resource utilization (ISRU): Uses only local materials, reducing mission mass and cost.

Scalability: The compaction method could be adapted to robotic or human‑operated systems.

Radiation and weather protection: Bricks made from local soil could help shield habitats from Mars’ harsh environment
Astronomy Magazine
Astronomy Magazine
.

In short: Yes — Martian soil can be compressed into strong, durable bricks using just pressure and a flexible mold, with the soil’s own iron oxide acting as a natural binder. This could be a key technology for future Mars settlements.

https://www.zmescience.com/science/mars-brick-is-cool/
Quote:

It seems that we don’t have to do any of those things — making bricks on Mars is as easy as compacting soil. The surprising technology was developed by a team of engineers at the University of California San Diego, who initially started work with Mars soil simulant to try and reduce the number of polymers required in brick-making.

To their surprise, they found out that only two steps are needed to turn the red dirt into a resilient building material. First, you have to place the soil in a flexible container (the team used a rubber tube). Then, you press it really hard — for a small sample, roughly the same pressure generated by a 10-lb hammer droped from a height of one meter is enough, said Yu Qiao, a professor of structural engineering at UC San Diego and the study’s lead author.

Image Quote: 170427091723_1_900x600.webp

So, now we can pile up soil and compress it into a pyramid shape.

As this is created, we might embed Cast Basalt pipes in a network, inside of it.
https://www.basaltlinedpipe.com/abrasio … asalt.html
Quote: application_cast-basalt3.webp

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_power_tower
Image Quote: PS10_solar_power_tower_2.jpg?utm_source=en.wikipedia.org&utm_campaign=imageinfo&utm_content=thumbnail_unscaled

We might put a tower on top of the Pyramid and focus heliostat mirrors on it to produce a heated Fluid, perhaps compressed Mars atmopshere.

The faces of the pyramid may be encased in special panels of utilizing Strained Silica with a bit of Aluminum, and some Infrared solar panels.

A relatively simple process to heat the interior of the pyramid with a fluid heated at the apex, of the Pyramid/Tower.

Referring to post #13 of https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 56#p241356
Reference to the type of panels is given.


The heat leakages providing a continuous electrical power for some time even in a dust storm, I think.

This may allow for the utilization of relatively cheap solar thermal power, and not using turbines.

There would be lots of raw materials to do this type of creation, I expect.

Ending Pending :-)

  1. Index
  2. » Search
  3. » Posts by Void

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB