You are not logged in.
I am all for a mass driver and it seems Elon Musk and Co. are considering it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afybjgW9JEc
Quote:
Elon Musk Just Revealed Starship’s Lunar Secret Weapon—600,000 Tons to Orbit Every Year!
TECH MAP
123K subscribers
I will hope they can make it happen.
But I still think that side engines can be considered of the types I previously mentioned in post #53: https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 77#p236377
Perhaps this could be prior to and auxiliary to the use of a Mass Driver.
Ending Pending ![]()
Here, as it happens is an update for Stoke Space: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … &FORM=VIRE
As I have said I have imaged that the engine nozzle setup could be made into a wrap around add-on for a Lunar Starship, allowing a Hydro-Lox assisted launch from the Moon. This would possibly be useful, if the Moon turns out to have a lot of water ice.
Some rockets do have parallel thrust methods. The Space Shuttle did, Falcon Heavy does.
This however would have multiple engine nizzles wrapped around the engine bay of the Lunar Starship, and of course it would need propellant tanks for them as well. However, the heat shield would not be included.
I have also suggested the use of Alice thrust as an alternative or perhaps a paste of LOX and Aluminum powder.
Ending Pending ![]()
Ending Pending ![]()
Well, I am going to completely agree with you that ground truth is needed, but there is this:
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/ice … tion-water
Quote:
About 22,600,000 results
Volcanic eruptions on the Moon have been suggested to have created large ice deposits at the poles. These eruptions, which occurred billions of years ago, released water vapor that could have condensed into ice under the lunar surface. The study by Andrew Wilcoski and his colleagues at the University of Colorado Boulder suggests that volcanic eruptions could have released enough water vapor to deposit ice at the lunar poles, especially in the frigid conditions of the poles. The research indicates that volcanic activity could have contributed to the formation of ice deposits, which may have persisted for billions of years due to the cold environment of the Moon.
Wikipedia
+1
Some articles I have read suggest that the Moon may have erupted vast amounts of water and CO, and that perhaps 41% of the erupted water could be in thick layers of ice at and near the poles. But it might be under several meters or regolith at this point.
But also now we seem to have this: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technolo … r-AA1SdiJk Quote:
Starlust
Earth's atmosphere hidden on the moon may prove to be life-sustaining for future astronauts
Story by Raj Naik • 1w •
3 min read
Quote:
Over billions of years, the magnetic field may have acted like a long-distance pipeline, guiding small amounts of Earth's atmosphere along its lines and depositing them into the lunar soil, known as regolith. Lunar soil samples brought back to Earth by the Apollo missions have shown the presence of certain volatile substances like carbon dioxide, argon, water, helium, and nitrogen.
But even absent abundant water, I also suggested propulsions using a paste of LOX and Aluminum powder.
Ending Pending ![]()
I like the author(s) of that.
I want to say that I am encouraged that SpaceX is thinking of a mass driver that could launch Satellites, and want them to do what they can in that direction.
But one size may not fit all.
I want to offer the idea of the HLS Power Belt. If HLS is out superhero of a cartoon, if we can strap auxiliary thrusters that use Lunar resources on it, then we may make a Lunar Starship as a viable method t lift mass from the Moon.
We have three options that I can think of Hydro-Lox, Alice, and Aluminum/LOX paste.
While SpaceX is avoiding legs for Starship to get to the Moon, I propose that legs made of Carbon and Plastics that are one time use might be engaged as well.
I see the idea of using electric Ion propulsion to bring them to Lunar Orbit as being sensible.
Have a look at Andromeda's engine: https://www.stokespace.com/introducing-andromeda/
Image Quote: 
This has a Hydro-Lox engine which could perhaps become a "Thruster Belt" that you could wrap around a HLS.
The point is that this could be strapped around an HLS and could be propelled by H2 and LOX from the Moon, if such does exist.
Once you strap a power belt on the HLS, you leave it on, most likely. So, this then allows HLS to become partially Hydro-Lox, without massive alterations.
This assembly then repeatedly takes cargo up to Lunar Orbits and receives a new dominantly Carbon and Plastic set of landing gear.
Each time it leaves the landing gear on the Lunar surface.
The Carbon and Plastics of the landing gear, plus perhaps some special metals included then support industrial intents on the Moon.
Then perhaps if you want to you can create an "Alice Thruster Belt": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ALICE_%28propellant%29
Quote:
Aluminum-Ice Rocket Propellant, or ALICE, is a rocket propellant that consists of a frozen mixture of nano-aluminum powder and water (i.e. aluminum and ice).[1]
When this thruster belt is to be refilled from the Lunar surface, it will burn itself out and most likely you do not want to detach it from the Lunar Starship. This is because the Lunar Starship is then used to land both itself and the attached "Alice Power Belt" back down to the Moon.
Finally we might be able some day to create a LOX/Aluminum paste engine. for a "Power Belt".
Some research has been done on it: https://space.stackexchange.com/questio … ant-source
And: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19940017287
While some of their research suggests squeezing a past out of a nozzle, I would be more interested in setting up something like a "Solid Rocket" method. So, then the "Power Belt" would be a burn up to orbit but no ability to land itself. But the Starship could carry it back down.
Adding a power belt to a Starship would broaden its base. Adding a one-time set of landing legs could broaden it more.
Shipments of propellants from Earth to Lunar Orbits might also be included using an electric Ion propulsion method. However, I anticipate that if this would be done it would be Methane only, and the refilling of Oxygen could be done on the Moons surface.
I will make the case that a Mass Driver is a mass projector that involves machinery and energy.
But a Starship with the "Power Belt" kit and the "Landing Legs" kit is also a matter projector that involve machinery and energy.
Perhaps both options may have value.
It is not yet certain that a Mass Driver is practical, I might point out.
Ending Pending ![]()
Here is more about Natural or Gold Hydrogen: https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/technol … r-AA1S24jl Quote:
Earth's crust hides enough 'gold' hydrogen to power the world for tens of thousands of years, emerging research suggests
Story by Sascha Pare • 1w •
7 min read
I have hopes that if Mars has icy permafrost at its deeps, that it may retain such Hydrogen as well.
The combination of such Hydrogen and CO2 from the atmosphere could be a terraforming tool and also support a form of farming and also a chemistry industry.
A Hydrogen well could also be a source of water if you reacted it with CO2 or Oxygen.
Ending Pending ![]()
I found the article you provided as very interesting/important Calliban.
It seems that P. Zeihan has some things to say that are at least partially true in a big way. I think that the China story can be modified by the interests of surrounding players, and what they see as worthwhile. I think that for the USA it may be partially worthwhile to prop up China to some extent, at last for a while. This can also be true for other pacific rim east Asian countries.
For example if East Asian labor is to falter per human workers, then if they convert partially to robots, to some degree those robot might make things that countries like the USA would want to buy. It is not only that American artificial labor might be of value but that of other countries also may be useful to maintaining out economy. So, the future might create strange bedfellows, I am guessing.
Here is some additional fun: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … d9909fe1ba Quote:
How Russia DESTROYED Europe's $245 Billion Theft With ONE Legal Move
YouTube
Egov Haze
2 views
And of course assets that Venezuela siezed under socialist/nationalist justifications, hints at another sort of international money games.
Ending Pending ![]()
Here is a related article: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … ajaxhist=0 Quote:
RUSSIA SUES EU FOR $230B, Brussels’ Asset Theft Exposed as Zelensky’s War Backfires |Times Now World
YouTube
Times Now World
74.9K views
Ending Pending ![]()
Here is something of a happy importance, I think: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technolo … r-AA1SBnvA Quote:
Morning Overview
30.6K Followers
Natural hydrogen jackpots may total trillions of tons beneath Earth
Story by Cassian Holt • 2d •
9 min read
If this proves out, then we should look for it on other worlds as well, and of course on Mars.
https://interestingengineering.com/spac … under-mars
Quote:
New evidence suggests Mars holds hidden water reserves 7 miles underground
To verify their findings, the scientists conducted tests on the diabase rocks, from Rydaholm in Sweden, which bear resemblance to the Martian rocks.By
Neetika Walter
Space
Mar 17, 2025 03:58 PM EST
Quote:
Recent studies suggest that Mars may host a significant underground reservoir of liquid water, potentially enough to fill oceans, located between 7 and 20 kilometers below the surface.
Evidence of Underground Water
Seismic Data: Research utilizing seismic data from NASA's InSight lander indicates that liquid water exists deep within Mars' crust. The analysis of seismic waves, particularly P-waves and S-waves, has revealed changes in the density and composition of materials beneath the surface, suggesting the presence of liquid water.
2
Reservoir Size: Estimates suggest that the amount of groundwater could cover the entire planet to a depth of 1 to 2 kilometers (about 0.62 to 1.24 miles). This water is not found in large lakes but is instead trapped within the tiny cracks and pores of volcanic rock.
2
Location: The detected water is located at depths ranging from 7.1 to 12.4 miles (11.5 to 20 kilometers) below the surface, making it challenging to access with current technology. The water is believed to be in a liquid state despite the frigid surface temperatures of Mars, which can drop to -170°F.
25 Sources
Implications for Mars Exploration
Potential for Life: The existence of liquid water underground raises the possibility of microbial life on Mars. Similar environments on Earth, such as deep mines and ocean floors, host various life forms, suggesting that Mars could also support life if conditions are right.
2
Geological History: Understanding the distribution and state of water on Mars is crucial for piecing together the planet's geological history and climate evolution. It helps scientists comprehend what happened to the water that once flowed on the surface billions of years ago.
24 Sources
Conclusion
The findings regarding Mars' underground water reservoirs provide exciting insights into the planet's potential for supporting life and its geological past. As research continues, these discoveries may guide future missions aimed at exploring Mars' subsurface and searching for signs of lif
This could explain quite a lot. If volcanic Eruptions might also cause the release of lots of Hydrogen in rare events, then for a short time Mars might warm up. This might have happened more often in the past than now.
If you can extract Hydrogen on Mars and access the atmosphere on Mars, big opportunities become available.
https://www.earth.com/news/breathing-wi … arly-life/
Quote:
Breathing without oxygen: How ancient microbes powered early life
Andrei Ionescu
ByAndrei Ionescu
Earth.com staff writer
Quote:
Microbes that life off of CO2 and Hydrogen
Microbes that thrive on CO2 and hydrogen are known for their ability to generate energy without relying on oxygen. These microbes have evolved unique metabolic pathways that allow them to convert CO2 and hydrogen into acetic acid, which can then be used to produce ATP. This process is crucial for life in environments where oxygen is not available, such as deep-sea hot springs. The discovery of these microbes offers insights into the early forms of life on Earth and potential applications in biotechnology and biofuel production.
Earth.com
+2
So then you can have lots of biological resources.
Pushing Hydrogen and Martian atmosphere under ice bodies, may even melt them if the microbes generate enough heat.
Then in such a world you might also have simple glass/plastic domes with a low pressure where Cyanobacteria might generate Oxygen.
The two processes would probably be very productive as agriculture assets, energy assets, and in chemistry in general.
Ending Pending ![]()
So, I will break my own rules, as sometimes is necessary. To speak is to be subject to potential predation.
But I like to examine, diagnose, and solve. This topic of the last post is the equivalent to me of figuring out how to do similar in outer space for a non-human situation. I am not as obsessed with this one as you might think. But this "File" in my mind is open so I choose to try to update it.
If it is true that hive minds are often dominated by certain types of females', and a narrow sliver of the male population, then such a hive mind relies on communication at the speed of conversation or it's equivalent.
For the human race to be competent to survive in its environment, it needs efficiency, and it needs capability. A hive mind can be more efficient and might also have sufficient capabilities.
In terms of the stone age, if you have 10 people with small bodies and extra fat on those bodies, they can survive better than 10 people with lots of muscle and body weight but low-fat levels. That is likely true, when the food supply runs low.
The exception to that is if the 10 stronger people take what food there is. But if that is done, then reproduction is inhibited because you likely killed off many of the female population.
The verbal collective of a hive mind is pitted against the partial autonomy of a collection of men and perhaps tomboys. That is if you excessively bulk up the brain, you can produce autonomous minds, but that comes at the cost of calories. Similarly, a bulking of muscle comes at a cost of calories. The point is, if you can have a collection of autonomous big brained and big muscled people, that can be afforded if the environment they are in offers rewards for those attributes. But if you are in a calorie restricted situation then you have to go to a lower powered hive mind.
Having the two genders (More or less), allows humans to access either of these options when it becomes necessary. Compared to most mammals, the human genders are most differentiated of all that I can think of. (I have also read that that is true).
I have read that all computers are female. Well, I really don't know, here is a response:
The statement that "All computers are said to be female" is a humorous and ironic reference to the historical and cultural perceptions of women in computing. Throughout history, women have played significant roles in the development and operation of computers, often working in roles that were initially feminized or associated with clerical tasks. This has led to a stereotype that computers are female, which has been challenged and corrected over time. The reality is that computers have been used by both men and women, and the gendered history of human computers reflects the diverse contributions of individuals in the field.
I suspect that as robots are created, the result will be more masculine, as to be animated in the material world. Males typically are more animated, as they have more muscle on average. I don't know that that is true, but we may find out.
So, what the computer has done for men is to give them a chance to be more communicative. And the produced network is a hive mind of sorts. And that may work faster than a purely verbal hive mind. Verbal hive minds might be slowed down by interpersonal contests. A computer being a high-speed idiot, (So far), even so a male which is often isolated from the core of verbal hive minds, gains a power he was unlikely to have by using computers.
We will see how gains what when humanoid robots emerge.
What I have at some point read is that in WWII, the Germans ordered that American officers should not be killed but rather be allowed to mislead the troops. It has been said that when the Germans would aim to kill the higher officers, then the Americans could start to improvise. So, if there are lower ranked troops with sufficient intellectual autonomy, the danger was that when the hierarch of the hive mind was killed, the Americans would then improvise something that the Germans would not be familiar with. I have read that some American men have an extra part of the brain that allows that. But they would not be selected to be the officers often as they do not easily comply with strict orders.
It is my notion that the American experience would have promoted the breeding of such men as opportunity and challenge existed here. In Europe, I expect that such men would be culled out for being disobedient.
More Coffee...............
I ran into an interesting video this morning: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8V21dm9Fuwk
Quote:
The Real Reason Beauty Standards Changed — And Why Men Pay the Price
Hannah Spier, MD
I am going to pause to listen to it again....................
I am very pleased that she seeks to understand and that she does have quite a lot of understanding.
Men's sexuality is their own. But the government has been bent to play pimp for those who want to turn it into a sex industry. I suppose that private enterprise often has value but, where it facilitates Royal thinking, and the damaging of the society, it has gone too far.
The women who she mentions only understand reality from their own shallow self-serving desires, which are actually perverted.
Unfortunately, things that are desired are manipulated by the succubus, by soliciting a pimping function from an incubus. It is much like the drug trade.
First you find out what is desirable.
Then you introduce it.
Then you withhold it.
Then you charge for it.
And you want to cripple the individual so as to be better able to exploit them.
We are in this stage where the product offered is not satisfactory, but the product desired is to be withheld.
The purpose is to produce an unsatisfied addiction. Male happiness would be the very last thing they would desire.
I have seen conversation that points to London for the drug trade. Opium Wars, American drug problems expanding in the 60's.
Royal thinking is that it is just fine for cause decay, and to feed off of it. Damage the lesser people and they will be easier to exploit.
You will find, i believe that the purpose of the current campaign against male sexuality, is to link male sexual satisfaction to the extraction of money and power.
I understand that when the government decided to figure out how to regulate this on the internet, they solicited advice from Priests, Feminists, and Pornographers.
Ha Ha, a Priest is the function of a pimp as to say who and how sex may occur. The Feminist has a desire to be satisfied endlessly, and a pornographer is a part of this.
So, instead of natural and voluntary depictions on the internet, those were smothered, and deviant and unhealthy things to be promoted for the extraction of money and power.
At any rate I need to move on to more useful things today. So, my summary is "Hands Off!". It is not yours and should not be yours. Get a job and do some useful work!
Stop assisting an unhealthy association of law enforcement with control of male sexuality to extract money and wealth.
I am as an old man who has little true interest in such things anymore. This was a postmortem of sorts.
I am very uninterested for the most part, but I hate irrational bumbling around while the ship is on fire.
And I am happier for it being able to dissociate myself again from the problem.
Ending Pending ![]()
Alright from the last post I have selected this video: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … de3f31dc76 Quote:
Wokeness and Intelligence with Edward Dutton
YouTube
Amazing Academics
34.3K views
I have found a refinement in my thinking that I confirmed in this video, I feel.
Starting at about 21.32 in the video we have a segment that differentiates intelligence emergence in the two genders. I feel that this is very important as they present it but I feel I have things of value to add.
I have held IQ as suspect, but it is a measurement. I have worked in association with Metrology, so I have perhaps a fair feel for how to evaluate measurements. They can be sneaky, difficult to understand under the surface.
I will list the stated items as I thought I heard them.
-Prior to puberty the boys and girls have about the same intelligence.
-Females have earlier puberty and their intelligence tops out at 15 years of age.
-Males have a later puberty, and their intelligence tops out at 21 years of age.
*If so then there is a period of time in the American public school system where girls are more intelligent than the boys.
*I feel that this has been exploited by the formulators of the public school system, to intentionally damage boys psychologically.
*Or it may be that boys need to learn how it is to be the inferior before they mature. (Not sure).
But the public school system was set up to stunt creativity, and to make assembly line type workers, and clerks and bosses to supervise them. The rich would own the supervisors, the supervisors then being above the clerks and the assembly line workers to be at the bottom or not employed in industry.
That is to become not a problem soon I hope as with robots and computers, if humans to exist with children, then the children can be tutored by robots, perhaps like the proposed Optimus Robot of TESLA.
We can get rid of all the damaged people who torment the children in schools.
It is claimed in the video that boys end up about 4 IQ points smarter than the girls once they grow to be men. That incidentally does not happen until about 3 years after the 12th grade.
I think that that only exists because of taking the values from the test at face value. I am not sayng that score has to be corrected but rather that its Apples to Oranges.
The speaker says that the females have a higher capability tilted to Language.
The speaker says that the males have a higher capability tilted to Math and Spatial Relations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spatial_i … sychology)
In my mind this begins to fit together.
While we let people with verbal skills manipulate society, as we may be lesser in that intelligence, now I see how it may be that the Neanderthals and perhaps Denisovans, receded and the surviving humans resemble early homoserines more.
The Neanderthals and perhaps the Denisovans, were in smaller groups. Often in challenging environments that would not support big groups. The males of the Neanderthals have been speculated to have had a lot of testosterones.
https://www.livescience.com/health/gene … -ancestors
Quote:
Neanderthals were exposed to higher levels of testosterone during development, which is likely to make them more unreconstructed in their behavior. This suggests that Neanderthals were more likely to start fights over mates and hierarchy in the group and more likely to have multiple partners. The study used the ratio of the two finger lengths for a range of ancient hominins, including four Neanderthals and an early modern human from 70,000 years ago. The findings indicate that Neanderthals were more testosterone fuelled than modern men, which could have made them more aggressive and promiscuous.
Live Science
+1
https://www.livescience.com/health/gene … -ancestors.
* Actually I think that the above passage may be false, as the hormone will promote strong bones and muscles. And old men of our age get crabby when their testosterone levels drop. Testosterone makes men friendly. But of course, if they have a masculine body and get angry then they can be a threat. If they are weak and get angry, then they may lack options to fight back.
Now let's have a look at the early Homo Sapiens females. Can you say "HIVE MIND!
In the wrong situation with a collection of females you might just as well jump into a sea full of sharks. Most men don't have much of a chance in that case. So be careful where you leap, stay to your own strengths do not play to theirs.
No, I do not think that a hive mind of females has to be evil, but it can be, just like some men can be a big problem.
So, can you measure the IQ of a hive mind? A hive mind can be of a collection of various people and now even computers.
My impression is that with the exception of when the young females migrate to another tribe, females stay closer to the village. So verbal competition and co-operation will matter there more than out in the hunting areas.
And the males if they go out to kill things, should be less reliant on language, as it does not pay to announce your presence in many cases.
And often unlike a village, things might jump down on you from a tree, or you might seek to hunt animals in trees. So, male thinking may be more 3 dimensional than female thinking I am guessing.
So, I am thinking that the subordination of the Neanderthal and Denisovan genomes to the early Homo Sapiens genome would be largely due to a large female hive mind. The Neanderthal females might not have been as competitive.
As for the dense bones and muscles of the Neanderthal and perhaps the Denisovan, with a bigger population, there might not have been enough food to keep them healthy in times of want.
There could be other factors as well of course.
How to deal with mentally ill dominantly female hive minds? I think we might want to have a look at Tomboys as potential allies.
They like to play with boy toys, and perhaps they could be helpful as they are still females.
I am guessing there is someone at SpaceX who is one. A very valuable one.
And we need to keep the wokeoids from trans gendering them and making the useless.
Ending Pending ![]()
I largely criticized the American society, but anther fault seems to exist in the British one. They seem to be infatuated with literally dividing the human race into ruler and servant sub species. This is damaging to the human potential, and should be wacked on the head with a shovel and then buried in the ground.
Ending Pending ![]()
I am putting this here for future review by me: https://www.bing.com/search?q=Wokeness+ … pc=EDGEXST
Articles by Professor Edward Dutton. One example is: "Wokeness and Intelligence with Edward Dutton
YouTube
Amazing Academics
34.3K views
"
I am not advocating or criticizing what he has said. I don't know that to think yet, but the samples I have of his speaking suggest that I will want to understand what he is claiming.
I was busy with plumbing and could not focus on the video I watched.
Ending Pending ![]()
Continuing from the last post, we could consider a rather absurd ring around the Moon or Mercury. The size makes it seem silly.
But what if you joined a series of "Cups" into a "Cup-Ring". It could spin faster than its occupied orbit. In doing that, it would have artificial gravity. If it ever broke, then rather than crashing, it would move to a higher orbit.
A very minimal drawing: 
So, a continuous ring rotating around the Moon or Mercury. I might also suggest dwarf planets or smaller moons, but perhaps space elevators would be better for those.
Anyway, if this were done, then we would likely honeycomb the Moon and Mercury with tunnels and vaults and fling the extracted materials to the ring.
But of course this is a very advanced capability that perhaps the human race will never archive.
Ending Pending ![]()
I found this to be worth a look: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNdMQtfoBec
Quote:
DNA Reveals the Genetic Ancestry of the Indians!
EvoBio-SJC
I think that someday it might be considered worthwhile to piece together Neanderthal, and or Denisovan genes into a genome, perhaps creating a 50% or more "Archaic" person.
I think that the idea that we are "Homo Sapiens" and out of Africa, with some genetic pollution from Neanderthals and Denisovans is very wrong. The wrong way to think of things.
It may be that the 30% of the Neanderthal genome that is said to be in the Indian genetics and the 20% in Europeans may not be the same.
Some people think that we will never meet Aliens, but we might create Aliens that are very close to our nature.
A more dangerous method would be to pull old genes out of the ground. I suppose that is full of chances of bad consequences. But I don't think that the testing reality gave in history caused everything that may have potential of utility to be retained.
Of course this would be to have sex with the dead. No, not contaxuality, but genetic mixing.
But this may be cursed. The Bible speaks of an entity that brings something that was dead to life. That entity is associated with condemnation.
Quote:
Revelation 17:8
In the Bible, the beast refers to an end-time entity described in Revelation 17:8. It is characterized as "the beast that was, and is not, and yet is," indicating its past existence, present nonexistence, and future return. This beast is associated with the woman who rides it, symbolizing a powerful and corrupt entity that will come to dominate the world before its destruction. The beast is often interpreted as representing a tyrannical empire or a form of world power that will rise again, ultimately leading to its downfall.
GotQuestions.org
+3
So, if you might think you are in a simulation, perhaps you don't want to be the one who causes a thing from past existence to annoy "God".
It is worth caring about I think. We don't want to do the wrong things.
But would it necessarily be a bad thing to work with Neanderthal or Denisovan genes to be able to speak with a form of human which might have a somewhat different brain, and so perhaps a different mind.
Ending Pending ![]()
I will show you something perhaps you have not seen.
Go to a map of the "Old World". Put your finger on the Caspian Sea. Imagine that you are looking at a puzzle. Now pick up all of the Indian Subcontinent including Iran and Pakistan and India of course. Now fold i on top of Europe, as is the Caspian Sea was a hinge.
Now put it back and fold Europe which also includes Russia and Siberia, on top of India.
I feel that to some degree, Europe and India are mirror images. If you are hooked on skin tones, get rid of that. If the Europeans were farming under the hot sun of the equator their skin tones would be darker.
They are both between Sub-Saharan Africa and China.
The genomes considered to be Caucasian tend to be between those poles.
And now North America and South America are mirror replicas.
So, if you are going to be hateful racists, even telling some people that they are living on stolen land, just shut up! Reality has a structure, that wants to exist. The idea that some evil "White People/Men" did not make this pattern repeat. It is baked into a structure which is way above your pay grade.
Some people think that causing people to murder each other can lead to an improved species by killing off the weaklings.
Among those who have screwed up our world with these philosophies are the NAZI, and the Communists/Socialists.
All this trouble. A stupid waste of time. And not superior race created from it, in my opinion. Just diminished capabilities.
I am neither interested in causing racial mixing or from preventing it.
It is not a task worth expending effort for.
So, there are domains, and the idiots who have tried to criminalize the America's for its mixing, should be ignored. They are just troublemakers with evil intentions.
I like this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C8dX5tEg2Wo
Quote:
Top Geneticist DISAGREES With Out of Africa Theory
Ancestor Vault
5.8K subscribers
Ending Pending ![]()
I am now interested in lowest useful Lunar orbits/frozen orbits.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frozen_orbit
Quote:
Low lunar orbits (LLO) are generally unstable, but there are frozen orbits that allow spacecraft to remain in low lunar orbit indefinitely. These frozen orbits occur at four inclinations: 27°, 50°, 76°, and 86°. The frozen orbits are characterized by their stability, where the orbital elements remain relatively constant despite perturbations from the Moon's gravity, allowing for long-duration missions without frequent station-keeping maneuvers.
Wikipedia
+2
I would want then to modify that to Actively Maintained Low/Frozen Orbits.
So, then if we choose an orbit, I suggest that by using electron beams, it might be possible to stabilize low or frozen orbits.
The electrons having very small mass, can be acerated to very high speeds to impact an orbiter or it's magnetic field.
The orbiter/platform could then emit those electrons again to modify its orbit as well.
The electron beams from the surface of the Moon, would have continuous power from solar powered systems in orbit with energy beamed down to each station.
If this can be the case, the Electron Fluid (Beams), are mass-like if not actually fully mass, and I think could be used as thrust as suggested, because more capable people than me think that interstellar probes could be accelerated by those means.
But elections cannot be made into solid objects.
So, I would like to try to find a method of projection of mass from the surface of the Moon and the accretion of mass to orbital platforms.
For the projectors I am looking at Neumann Drive or Magdrive. However it might be possible to have a mass driver that could project magnetic dust to the platforms.
So, now I am looking at an accretion process for the platforms.
For this I am going to start with something most people could understand could be an inverted spinning cup.
The output of Neumann Drive or Magdrive is only partially understood. I presume that it will involve fine powders, perhaps and I do not understand how well this could focus. The lower in orbit will be the platform the easier to maintain a focus, but also the higher speed will be the plume.
The spinning cup will have synthetic gravity inside of it and could use electrostatic and magnetic forces to try to accumulate the mass projected to it. I am also hoping to involve vacuum welding in the capture process.
As this mass is accumulated, this will drag the platform down, as the projected mass will only have partial orbital energy. But this can be compensated for with the electron beam flows. Also, with the electron ejection from the platforms. That ejection would also allow the maintenance of proper spin speed.
Because of the differential speed of the interior of the cup of the platform and the plume of materials sent up from the surface of the Moon, but Neumann Drive or Magdrive, we will want to do our best to accumulate mass rather than to have our platform sand-blasted out of existance. So, the platofrm's cup having access to magnetic properties, we will put larger magnetic objects to line the cup. These could be marble sized or larger. The point is the dust from the plume being of small sizes, impacting these objects will be relatively small in size, so their inertia should be insufficient to dislodge the much larger "Magnetic Marbles?". And the heat of impact may be small enough that the magnetic marbles do not heat up enough to rise above their magnetic curie point. Keep in mind also that the marbles will be subject to centrifugal forces from the spinning of the cup. But even if the magnetic "Marbles?" would be dislodged from the cup the magnetic field might bring them back to the platform.
The lining of the "Cup" being of "Marbles?", then can be rebuilt continually even if the captured mass is removed from them by some process. So, I think that this could have chances of working.
From the previous post: Just for visualization let's suppose a satellite of the Moon has a LC frequency of 1 minute. That is rather long but maybe calms the mind to think calmly. From the just previous post:
Using Capacitors, on the platform it might be possible to do an LC support for a magnetic field. Super Conductive Coils would also be wanted. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LC_circuit
Image Quote:
L = Superconducting Coil. It holds power temporarily as a magnetic field. The Current drops to zero when the magnetic field has expanded all the way.
C = Capacitor Bank. It holds power temporarily as a Capacitive field, using a static voltage. at the point of maximum filling of the capacitor of with electrons and holes.
So this is a tank circuit, and it is to flip flop between these two states.
An magnetic field that expands and contracts will still attract the "Marbles?". You could have some power losses as there will be inductive reactance. But there may be ways to reduce the eddy currents in the "Marbles?".
Here is my first attempt at a drawing for it: 
The "Cup" is spinning on a vertical axis, and so has centrifugal force holding the "Marbles?". But also if the "Marbles?" have magnetic properties, the magnetic field is also holding the "Marbles?".
The desire is for the plume of materials ejected from a Neumann Drive or Magdrive to accumulate to the "Marbles?" by vacuum welding, or even by centrifugal forxes, and in some cases even by magnetic forces.
Also, differential electric polarities might help to collect the Mass. If an electron beam has just struck the cup before a plume arrives, then the (-) charge may be attractive to a possible (+) charge or neutral charge of the particles of the plume.
Ending Pending ![]()
I have not completely revied this but want to later: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … d50f40545c Quote:
The Fabian Society: How Britain Engineered Communism & Controls The World
YouTube
CRYPTO RICH POLITICS
2 views
I don't know how much I believe what is said but am interested. If anyone wants to present opposing views, I have no problem with that.
Ending Pending ![]()
This post relies on the just previous post as reference.
https://www.thecollector.com/evolution- … ot-police/
Image Quote: 
Shield formations remind me of possible formations of solar panels, in the case where increased actuation would be implemented.
In the case where power can be beamed by infrared light from space, there could come a type of economics that might justify such strange efforts.
In reality at first instead of soldiers holding the multi-part formation of flat objects more likely a frame of posts and horizontal beams with privets might be implemented.
But with the advent of humanoid and other robots, I do not want to dismiss the idea the robots could reconfigure formations as might be advantageous.
And this might be useful on Earth or Mars.
Keeping in mind that energy from space may come 24/7 and arrive from various directions, then flexibility of orientation may have advantages.
A horizontal frame of beams supported on posts, with pivots might allow for special orientations for power beams from satellites in orbits.
This ability may also allow the panels to orient to deal with environmental problems like Snow, Hail, Winds, Rain.
Another factor might be that even in the day, an orientation for reception from orbital sources would be able to allow light in for plants to grow under the array. Then on rare occasion, in the night, if the orientation created a flat ceiling, this might ward off early and late frost.
Many may say that the cost of the hardware for this will be too high for the benefit provided. However, last thing I viewed indicated that our planet could support 1 billion Optimus Robots without space power. 1 billion do a maximum of 4 billion shifts of 8 hours all the time. I presume that with space power it could support much more than that.
In that case I would expect large scale deflation in hardware expenses.
Something to consider, I guess.
Ending Pending ![]()
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OKQMER75Vms
Quote:
China wants to mass-produce space rockets like cars
Inside China Business
I believe that SpaceX is already on that path, and I expect that many more could be as well.
So, China can stuff as much capitol into this as they want to, being the kind of government that they are.
SpaceX is apparently strongly considering a IPO to the Stock Market.
The government now seems to own 10% of Intel: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/t … at-to-know Quote:
Trump says U.S. has gained 10% stake in Intel for $11.1 billion in government funds
Politics Updated on Aug 22, 2025 7:17 PM EST — Published on Aug 22, 2025 4:31 PM EST
It is fairly obvious that if we believe that the space industry is going to be increasingly profitable, our government and other entities, even China perhaps may be able to buy SpaceX stock, or other space company stocks as a mechanism of wealth promotion and also as to some degrees have influence on company decisions.
So, this is a different route than NASA. However, the government might give some control of share voting to NASA, maybe.
If the government were to invest in space companies, then this could strengthen our national financial situation, presuming the ideas of Data Centers and Space Based Solar Power, Etc. are actually going to be profitable.
I am guessing that Elon Musk and others have already seen this potential, but if not, they need to consider the future nature of things as they may become, if these companies trade on the stock market.
I think the situation will be mostly upside, but maybe others understand this more than I do.
So, this could put SpaceX, Blue Origin, others on steroids more or less to both gain the country financially and to promote advanced technology.
Ending Pending ![]()
A useful article about space based solar energy beaming to the surface of Earth: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ne0tPQXzSps
Quote:
Overview Energy's Path to Orbital Solar Dominance: Beaming Unlimited Solar Energy down to Earth
Space Startup News
4.95K subscribers
Some specific information about altitude and methods.
https://www.overviewenergy.com/
Beaming "Wide Beam Infrared" to existing solar panel installations as the receivers.
I would speculate that some wasting would occur if the solar panels were not continuous.
I wonder if a sort of "Greenhouse" could be comprised of actuator driven solar panels that could mesh with each other on one "Pose", and during the day at times open gaps to let light into gardens under the solar installation.
So, when closed up, infrared shined on it during the night would moderate freezing temperatures. In the day a different pose might facilitate reception of natural sunlight and open up to reduce overheating.
Other poses might be deployed for an instance of snowfall, hail, or rain.
So, this would be a actuated robotic solar array system.
* Another factor is that orbital solar that sends power to the surface of Earth could also at times send power to rockets and other space plaforms. Maybe to places on the Moon?
Ending Pending ![]()
(th) I appreciate that you have a reply, but I feel it needs some correcting: https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 25#p236225 Quote:
tahanson43206
Moderator
Registered: 2018-04-27
Posts: 23,455
For Void re post on electrons as suitable for use as propellant...Thanks again for introducing this concept to the forum. I appreciate the learning opportunity and came away with an understanding that a space vessel that uses ionization will be in position to accelerate positively charged objects and an equal quantity of negatively charged objects so as to maintain a balance.
I had not considered this need before you brought the matter to our attention.
(th)
What you have stated could be an option but is not the limit of the utility of what I posted about.
I the case I have presented involving the Moon, it is amusing that old theories of electricity have some application to explain what might be done: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluid_the … lectricity Quote:
The fluid theory of electricity, also known as the two-fluid theory, posited that electricity was composed of two distinct fluids: vitreous and resinous. Vitreous electricity was associated with glass and other materials, while resinous electricity was linked to amber and other substances. These fluids were thought to carry electrical charges and interact with each other through frictional forces. The theory was widely accepted in the 18th century and was used to explain various electrical phenomena, including the attraction and repulsion of charged objects. However, the one-fluid theory, proposed by Benjamin Franklin, suggested that all electrical phenomena could be explained by a single fluid, which existed in a neutral state unless disturbed by frictional forces. This theory was later updated to include the effects of magnetism and the discovery of electrons. The fluid theories of electricity eventually evolved into the modern understanding of electrical charge and the behavior of conductors and insulators.
Wikipedia
+5
The evolution of electric understanding caused the development of electron involved processes to perform useful work, as we might define work.
The idea of using the mass of electrons at a relativistic speed, is new, at least to me, and there is a question of where the Voltage and Current are concealed in the power of the device. E * I = P It is in there I am sure, I suppose it may be [Velocity of Electrons] * [# of Electrons over a time period] = [A less than 100% efficient Thrust].
It is as if we might squirt water with a garden hose to a spacecraft, and then pressurize the water collected again and squirt it from the ship.
But even with that I am bringing back the Concept of a Fluid with Mass.
The Mass of Electrons was never something that I needed to consider in the level of work I did in the Electric and Electronic work I have done. Now I am quite interested.
We can collect Mass (If you consider Electrons to be Mass), from the Moon, and Squirt it to a Satellite, and then Squirt it yet again.
We might do that with Rockets, but it is complex and very low in efficiency.
We cannot do that the same way with Lasers as Photons have no Mass and do not flow though electrical conductors.
But that Mass of electrons is only useful for thrust, we cannot build things from it.
But if we can eject either (+) Ions or Neutral Atoms (Having their electrons), we may try to accumulate them to a Satellite, and then try to justify them to a circular orbit using their own inertia and the inertia we can generate by intercepting an electron stream and then ejecting the electrons yet again from the Satellite.
The (+) Ions or Neutral Atoms are to be ejected as another type of fluid perhaps in pulses from a Neumann Drive or Magdrive.
Definition of a Fluid: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluid
Gasses and Liquids are fluids. I think Plasma is a fluid. As I look at it a flow of electrons can be considered to be a fluid or at lease similar to a fluid. You can fluidize soil or sand. An earthquake can do that. A flow of a granular substance can be "Fluidized".
So the output of the Neumann Drive or Magdrive might be fluid like in nature where it may start as a plasma, but I am not sure, I kind of expect it to cool into atoms and molecules. These are all potentially fluid in nature.
But I am not ready to state that the concept of possibilities is set in concrete yet. Rather some interesting investigations of true results may justify investment of time and effort.
Just for visualization let's suppose a satellite of the Moon has a LC frequency of 1 minute. That is rather long but maybe calms the mind to think calmly. From the just previous post:
Using Capacitors, on the platform it might be possible to do an LC support for a magnetic field. Super Conductive Coils would also be wanted. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LC_circuit
Image Quote:
L = Superconducting Coil. It holds power temporarily as a magnetic field. The Current drops to zero when the magnetic field has expanded all the way.
C = Capacitor Bank. It holds power temporarily as a Capacitive field, using a static voltage. at the point of maximum filling of the capacitor of with electrons and holes.
So this is a tank circuit, and it is to flip flop between these two states.
It should be possible to squirt an electron beam to hit the Satellite itself, but I would rather have it penetrate the Magnetic field while it is inflated. My hope is that the field can become saturated with electrons. (But I am not sure this can work).
The big hope then is to collect the electrons as the magnetic field collapses, and to pass them into an electron gun and then pass the produce beam into a particle accelerator, to provide additional propulsion. My hope is that the beam of electrons can penetrate through the magnetic field by virtue of a very fast speed and that the magnetic field is collapsing.
It would be helpful if a time delay could be produced by some device, where the electrons could be collected and stored for some short period until the magnetic field is sufficiently collapsed, and then to accelerate them to an ejection using a particle accelerator.
A Leyden Jar has some of the characteristics I want: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leyden_jar
Quote:
A Leyden jar (or Leiden jar, or archaically, Kleistian jar) is an electrical component that stores a high-voltage electric charge (from an external source) between electrical conductors on the inside and outside of a glass jar. It typically comprises a glass jar with metal foil cemented to the inside and the outside surfaces, and a metal terminal projecting vertically through the jar lid to make contact with the inner foil. It was the original form of the capacitor[1] (also called a condenser).[2]
I think it is a form of a capacitor actually.
But in this case, I am hoping that the electrons that flow in the LC circuit will be distinct from the ones I hope to catch in the external magnetic field. But as the magnetic field collapses, I hope to convey by hook or by crook the electrons to a temporary storage "Jar" composed of yet another capacitor bank.
I believe that electrons and Ions can be captured into a magnetic field, so I have hopes that this would work. But if the magnetic field does not work then the electrons could be caused to impact the metal of the Satellite itself as an alternative.
There seems to be some hope:
https://www.spaceweather.gov/sites/defa … -FINAL.pdf
Quote:
Yes
Can electrons from the solar wind be captured into a magnetic field?
Yes, electrons from the solar wind can be captured into a magnetic field. This occurs through a process called magnetic reconnection, where the solar wind's magnetic field interacts with Earth's magnetic field. When the solar wind encounters the Earth's magnetic field, it can enter the magnetosphere and travel along the geomagnetic field lines in a corkscrew path. This path is influenced by the solar wind's magnetic field and the Earth's magnetic field, leading to the capture of solar wind particles into the Earth's magnetic field.
NOAA / NWS Space Weather Prediction Center
The question of when the (+) ions or neutral atoms could be sent to the Satellite. The (+) might be captured in the magnetic field, neutral atoms might vacuum weld to the Satellite (Fuse), particularly if the Satellite has a strong (-) charge at the time.
So we are attempting to propel with electrons as fluids and capture also atomic matter sent from the Moon.
The two processes do not have to happen at the same time. Perhaps the LC circuit pulses twice, and you send Electrons one time and Atoms another time in alternation.
I need to get some sleep.
Ending Pending ![]()
So, there seems to be more to think about for Electron Particle Accelerators on and around the Moon: https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 17#p236217
Quote:
I have been very pleased to see it said that a CRT is a form of Electron Particle Accelerator. My phone said so, but of course as always my computer is not the same.
Cathode Ray Tube: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cathode_ray_tube
Image Quote:The original televisions would use the CRT method shown above.
Electron particle accelerators are devices that accelerate electrons to very high speeds and energies. They are used in various applications, including fundamental research in particle physics, radioisotope production for medical diagnostics, and ion implanters for semiconductor manufacturing. The process involves generating a beam of electrons, which are then accelerated by electric and magnetic fields to achieve the desired energy levels. These accelerators are crucial for studying the structure and properties of matter and the fundamental interactions of elementary particles.
Wikipedia
+5An Electron Particle Accelerator that can send electrons at relativistic speeds, would need much more in the way of electric and magnetic methods to accelerate the electrons, I expect.
I am hoping the technology could be used to help propel spacecraft that travel interplanetary as well as the existing intention to make them travel interstellar.
I am thinking that a spacecraft surrounded by a magnetic field might receive the electrons. So, you might not be striking solid materials but magnetic lines of force.
Ending Pending
I am going to modify a drawing. Coffee and Pause................
This modified drawing includes a magnetic field as part of the Platform Target. I also indicate that the Lunar environment including the solar wind efficts supplies lots of Ions: 
Sunlight also ionizes certain substances as well from the Moon or in the Lunar environment.
For the moment I am imagining the equator of the Moon as having many Electron Projectors in a ring on its surface. They might operate even in the dark of the Moon, provided that Lasers provide power from orbit to the Electron Projectors.
We think that Electron Projectors could be made to provide electrons at relativistic speeds, but I think this application could do well with tamer speeds. The platform could be as little as 50 miles/km from the surface, or maybe 1000 or more. But it is a relatively short distance.
As for the Platform(s) there could be many of them. Someday their might just be a continuous ring around the Moon (Or Mercury).
The Electron Particle Accelerators on the Platform could be as strong as you can manage and want. In that case the "Return Electron Beam" might not strike the Moon at all but might disperse into the plasma of the Solar Wind in the Solar System.
But the Solar Wind striking the Moon would continue to provide replacement electrons to the Moon.
So, it is kind of weird, if this works, then you can supply mass from the Moon to orbital Platform/Magnetics as receivers. And the hope to expel that additionally modify your orbit. I see a conflict in the idea of expelling electrons from the magnetic field, but maybe just accelerating them more will do the deed. Or maybe it is an AC field, and you fire electrons on the moment of maximum field collapse.
Pause.........
Using Capacitors, on the platform it might be possible to do an LC support for a magnetic field. Super Conductive Coils would also be wanted. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LC_circuit
Image Quote: 
When your magnetic field was up, you could receive Electrons Projected from the Moon's surface.
When your magnetic field was down, you should Project Relativistic Electrons from your platform into deep space.
The cycle might not have to be that fast. We have a Frequency of 60 Hz, in the USA, typically, but maybe a much lower frequency would reduce energy losses and be more compatible with the reception and ejection of mass.
I hope that either (+) Ions of Atoms or Neutral Atoms could be projected to the Platforms using Neumann Drive or Magdrive. And that would likely be best done as pulses.
Absent the magnetic field, you might hope to impact the under surface of the platform and plate materials onto its attached receiver plates.
But when the magnetic field was expanded, this would be another method to catch at least the (+) Ions, I think, but that might become dust. Dust might cover your power source such as solar cells or a rectenna.
So, the create the whole package to be gainful, in results, economically, some things need discovery. Sorting out conflicting aspects to be more harmonious to a good purpose.
Good being our desire for gainful results.
Pause..................
With Matter Projectors to Lunar Orbit and Earth Orbit (Rockets are Matter Projectors also), the exchange of materials between Moon Orbit and Leo should be supported by Neumann Drive and/or Magdrive.
Lunar Oxygen is not yet included into this scheme. Pause...............
In creating conductive materials that might be Projected from surface devices such as Neumann Drive or Magdrive, free Oxygen will become available to refill Rockets.
But beyond that utility, it might be easier to carry rust or Magnetite as cargo in a ship to orbit.
About 1/2 of 1 % of the Moons regolith fines is expected to be magnetic Iron. So wheeled robots might be able to retrieve it.
If not then Iron is relatively easy to extract, along with some Oxygen from the general regolith.
You could manufacture Magnetite or Hematite.
These substances could be Projected to Orbit using rockets.
Maybe Magnetite could be projected using some kind of Mass Driver of a more classical type. Maybe it could be Projected to the Magnetic Platform. But again, dust may cause trouble for power supply systems like solar panels or rectenna's.
So, maybe some of these things can be possible.
SpaceX/Elon Musk seem to think they can build a Mass Driver to Project machines made on the Moon to orbit. That would be wonderful.
But there may be these other ways as well.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
We can next wonder about stony objects or objects that have some stony materials in them. (Most objects).
Phobos and Deimos seem like low hanging fruit, to me. It is possible that natural electrical charges can be "Harvested" to some useful purposes.
And I do not think it is that wild of an idea to think to manufacture things from those two moons of Mars and transport items to the Earth/Moon system from them. Using Solar Energy, Robots, and Raw Materials. Time is the other consideration. So, if you use some efficient space drives and it takes 5 years to move a cargo to Earth/Moon, is that so hard to consider as useful?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Then there are objects like Mercury and Stony Asteroids. Vesta is attractive.
Ending Pending ![]()
I have been very pleased to see it said that a CRT is a form of Electron Particle Accelerator. My phone said so, but of course as always my computer is not the same.
Cathode Ray Tube: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cathode_ray_tube
Image Quote: ![]()
The original televisions would use the CRT method shown above.
Electron particle accelerators are devices that accelerate electrons to very high speeds and energies. They are used in various applications, including fundamental research in particle physics, radioisotope production for medical diagnostics, and ion implanters for semiconductor manufacturing. The process involves generating a beam of electrons, which are then accelerated by electric and magnetic fields to achieve the desired energy levels. These accelerators are crucial for studying the structure and properties of matter and the fundamental interactions of elementary particles.
Wikipedia
+5
An Electron Particle Accelerator that can send electrons at relativistic speeds, would need much more in the way of electric and magnetic methods to accelerate the electrons, I expect.
I am hoping the technology could be used to help propel spacecraft that travel interplanetary as well as the existing intention to make them travel interstellar.
I am thinking that a spacecraft surrounded by a magnetic field might receive the electrons. So, you might not be striking solid materials but magnetic lines of force.
Ending Pending ![]()
I think it is important again to mention the future of Space Junk. While it might be recycled Apples to Apples to some extent, in some cases the original form will not be retained.
As an example, high quality solar panels, might be more possible to manufacture on Earth or maybe even the Moon, but not so much in orbit. In that case they might be converted into some other things.
I am not so much talking about Kessler syndrome junk, more about giant platforms for AI and Solar Power. But of course, if you can deal with that space junk, you probably would do so with the LEO junk as well.
It is likely that if high quality solar panels were to be made on the Moon, some substances for it would need to be imported to the Moon, either from other worlds, or from space junk.
It might be that some junk could be recycled to make heat engines, and radiation shielding, mirrors, and other things.
Neumann Drive and Magdrive will likely be able to use some space junk as propellants.
Ending Pending ![]()
(th) per your request: https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 80#p236180
I will make some attempts.
Keep in mind that Copilot is likely more of a mimic, (Which is clever at arrangements of information), than it is a composer at this point.
A composer and a mimic may both play piano. They are both important to the expansion of abilities.
But I have caught Copilot spouting dogma.it is a garbage in garbage out danger, which might compromise the ability to compose. Never-The-Less it is becoming a valuable resource.
Electrons may tend to be about as common as the Nucleus of atoms, as far as I know. For the whole universe, I don't know.
A bit like planets Electrons can be bound to a central mass of a star or collection of stars or "Rogue", as to be bound to a Galaxy or other possible attractor.
Similarly, it has to do with energy. More energy allows an electron to go more Rogue, I believe. But it's electron (-) charge, always wants to dance in some way with a atom nucleus (+) charge.
In some ways it is a pity that the transistor showed up. Vacuum Tube (Valve), technology was more similar to what we might do in space than transistors are.
I am old enough that I was minimally trained to repair old type televisions. Those had an electron beam which would be manipulated by magnetic fields from it's point of emission and would impact the phosphor on the screen of the TV.
These electrons would not have been as energetic as to be capable of accelerating a spacecraft (Much), and soon neutralized by hitting the phosphor.
Some matter allows electrons to more easily be borrowed, depending on the element.
A natural situation where electrons are borrowed from space plasma seems to occur with the Martian moon Phobos.
If I understand this properly the heavy [+) ions having more mass have a harder time getting to the leeward side of the moon Phobos but the Electrons (-) with lower mass can fill a sort of "Electron Cloud" on the leeward side of Phobos.
So the energy of the motion of the solar wind blocked by the moon Phobos causes a separation of (+) and (-) ions. They will then mix and sort of combine somewhere downstream.
The need for a particle accelerator to generate "Super Rogue Relativistic Electrons", is a daunting notion to me. But apparently someone thinks they could do it.
I have put my professional credentials at risk! (I have none), to suggest what I am going to suggest but here goes.
Coffee and a pause to make a diagram.....................
OK let's try this and hope we will discover that it might work, or discovery why it won't work, as to know what does not work may indicate what else might work.

I suppose I am thinking of the Moon as a reservoir of Ions of opposite charges. I am supposing that I can attempt to start with the electron beam I understand, which requires that the Cathode be heated and a strong (-) charge be applied to it. As the "Platform" gets overcharged (-) however, I am thinking we have another electron beam emitted from the platform which will bend to touch the Moon after a time of passage around it.
The platform being of a (-) charge, I am hoping that the neutral or (+) charged ions from the Neumann Drive or Magdrive will be drawn towards the platform. I am hoping that their energy level will be sufficient to cause the atoms to vacuum weld to the platform. The danger might be that the energy level would cause them to erode the platform.
The Electron Beam I have suggested may be insufficient for the task so perhaps indeed particle accelerators would be needed.
This might not be too distant from electroplating, which is done on Earth, if it can be made to work.
If the bottom of the platform had attached plates to accumulate plated materials onto, then those might be removed and replace periodically so that the accumulated mass may be further processed into a resource.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_deposition
Quote:
Vacuum deposition is a group of processes used to deposit layers of material atom-by-atom or molecule-by-molecule on a solid surface. These processes operate at pressures well below atmospheric pressure (i.e., vacuum). The deposited layers can range from a thickness of one atom up to millimeters, forming freestanding structures. Multiple layers of different materials can be used, for example to form optical coatings. The process can be qualified based on the vapor source; physical vapor deposition uses a liquid or solid source and chemical vapor deposition uses a chemical vapor.[2]
So, perhaps some future thinking would render something like this possible.
If so, then it will be a sort of Mass Driver or as I like to say Mass Projector.
I want to mention again that I think it is likely that the point where the return electron beam would impact the Moon could attract (+) and neutral Ions, atoms to itself. This could include Hydroxyl (+) and water molecules.
But it would be tricky to incorporate that feature into the main process of projecting mass off of the Moon.
Ending Pending ![]()
I am thinking about matter projectors.
-Rockets.
-Ion Electric
-Mass Drivers/Rail Guns/Etc.
-Electron Beams?
Quote:
Copilot Search Branding
Schematic of the experimental setup. Dimensions are given in Table 1. The used coordinate system is indicated in the centre of the exit plane.
Electron beam propulsion is an innovative method that utilizes high-speed electron beams to propel spacecraft, offering potential solutions for interstellar travel and efficient propulsion systems.
Overview of Electron Beam Propulsion
Electron beam propulsion is a form of beam-powered propulsion, where energy is transmitted to a spacecraft via directed beams of electrons. This method allows for the generation of thrust without the need for traditional propellant, making it a promising technology for future space exploration, particularly for interstellar missions.
How It Works
Acceleration of Electrons: Electrons are accelerated to relativistic speeds (close to the speed of light) using particle accelerators. This creates a high-energy beam that can be directed towards a spacecraft.
2
Propulsion Mechanism: The high-speed electron beam imparts momentum to the spacecraft, effectively pushing it forward. This method can generate significant thrust while minimizing the mass of onboard propellant.
2
Sustained Energy Delivery: Unlike traditional propulsion systems that rely on onboard fuel, electron beam propulsion can continuously deliver energy from a stationary source, such as a solar statite positioned near the Sun, to the spacecraft.
14 Sources
Advantages
High Efficiency: Electron beam propulsion can achieve higher exhaust velocities compared to conventional chemical rockets, leading to improved efficiency and performance.
1
Reduced Mass Requirements: By eliminating the need for large amounts of onboard propellant, spacecraft can be designed to be lighter and more capable of carrying scientific instruments.
2
Potential for Interstellar Travel: This technology could enable spacecraft to reach significant fractions of the speed of light, making interstellar missions feasible within a human lifetime.
24 Sources
Challenges
Beam Coherence: Maintaining the coherence of the electron beam over vast distances is a significant challenge. As the beam travels, it can spread out, reducing its effectiveness.
2
Material Limitations: The materials used in the construction of the beam emitter and the spacecraft must withstand extreme conditions, including high temperatures and radiation near the Sun.
1
Technological Development: While the concept is theoretically sound, practical implementation requires advancements in technology, particularly in particle acceleration and beam control.
24 Sources
Recent Developments
Recent studies and proposals, such as the "Sunbeam" mission, explore the feasibility of using relativistic electron beams for propulsion. This mission aims to propel a 1,000-kilogram probe to Alpha Centauri, demonstrating the potential of this technology for future space exploration.
nasaspacenews.com
+1In summary, electron beam propulsion represents a cutting-edge approach to spacecraft propulsion, with the potential to revolutionize space travel and enable ambitious missions beyond our solar system.
So, what I am wondering is if you could have "Targets" orbiting the Moon, at low altitude, and suck Electrons out of the Moon and squirt them at those platforms. Could the platforms in turn Squirt Electrons off of them to maintain or alter an orbit?
As I understand it also if each platform had a magnetic field the electron beam might push on it.
But anyway if the platform has a (-) charge,
And we squirted atoms at it using a Magdrive or Neumann Drive with a (+) charge, can we get the projected atoms to vacuum weld to the target device?
I believe that most conductive materials can be used in a Neumann Drive, and perhaps also in a Magdrive.
So, this would be a sort of Mass Driver system, or as I like to say "Matter Projection Method".
Quote:
Copilot Search Branding
What Is an Electron? Definition and Facts
Yes
Yes, electrons do have mass. The mass of an electron is approximately 9.10938 x 10^-31 kg, which is about 1/1836 the mass of a proton. While this mass is extremely small compared to protons and neutrons, it plays a crucial role in the behavior of atoms and the formation of matter.
So, an Electron Beam is a Matter Projector??? Well, it does have mass.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
A conversation about Data Bases in Space: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWkbXfdD1SU
Quote:
EXCLUSIVE: Elon’s Next Business Dwarfs Optimus
Brighter with Herbert
I am willing to entertain this: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … d57acfd544 Quote:
Out of Eurasia - Is Human Origins Reversed?
YouTube
Highly Compelling
4.1K views
I think that if the concentration of favorable genes though gene flow was a possible way to formulate part-populations that were efficient and capable of adaptation to a situation or set of situations, then the core of the collection of Africa and Eurasia, and India might be where this could be expected to occur more often.
You cannot have capability unless you are sufficiently efficient to still exist as a replicating pattern. Capability though can give good rewards to provide efficiency.
Rigor stimulates adaptation, but reward gives a desirable boost.
I have wondered about the ice age world, and if there could have been a more intelligent sea fairing group or groups of people in that time.
A flash of collective genius which faded for some reason.
Oxygen levels have been a matter of interest. Mountain peoples are impressive if they have adapted to low Oxygen levels. However, until now they could not modify that rigor with invention, they could only adapt to it physically it seems. The rigor has produced abilities that are to be respected. However, the reward was perhaps not that massive.
During the Ice Age the Coasts were as much as 400 feet lower than they are now. This then would have resulted in Oxygen displacement.
A person living on a coast then would have more Oxygen than a person that lives at an ocean coast now.
It might be a tiny difference but also it did probably matter. The extra Oxygen in an ice age coast, would have been at the expense of the Oxygen displaced by the continental ice Caps.
It may be that this does not matter, but every breath a human take involves the movement of muscles and blood systems. A body can endure the rigor of existing, but the balance between rigor and reward, may affect capability.
Perhaps you can think just a little better with just a pinch more of Oxygen. The rigor of the seacoasts runs parallel to the mastery of it with technology. Obviously, you might start with a raft then to a canoe, and then maybe Polynesian, Viking, or Innuit level technology.
The coasts would generally have lots of food, and also if you had to fear "Savages" you might want watercraft to move to an island refuge.
At this time we only have some below sea level areas, on the planet, and much of that is desert in nature, so not too rewarding.
But the Mediterranean Sea dried up due to geology at times so perhaps in those days, that could have been a good place to have a congregation of useful genes, and maybe a burst of genius. An extra pinch of Oxygen may have been available.
When the ice caps melted, people adapted for that extra pinch of Oxygen might have struggled against inland peoples who were used to a lower Oxygen level.
Ending Pending ![]()
This fellow named Tom Mueller is spoken of here as i am impressed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8QRZyNkkbzc
Quote:
The Visionary Who Made Rockets Reusable
Relicverse24
I am in a state of comfort as he is still active with "Impulse Space" it is said.
I also like that they seem to be partnering with Relativity Space with it's Terran-R.
Impulse space seems to want to solve for moving payloads beyond LEO.
Ending Pending ![]()
Other members now absent have suggested mushrooms in the past: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_GMXeJBzVg4
Quote:
How Mycelium Is Taking Over Manufacturing Industries
EyeTech
23.5K subscribers
Now add this:
https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 22#p236122
Quote:
This seems like fun: https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/compani … r-AA1S9stV Quote:
US firm plans to fire lasers from satellites to power solar farms at night
Story by Chris Young • 5h •
2 min readThis would be helpful on Mars also I expect.
Ending Pending
Now add this:
https://www.marscompany.com/data-centers
Quote:
Why Build Data Centers on Mars?
The Red Planet offers unique environmental advantages that support advanced computing:
Naturally Cold Climate
Mars’ frigid temperatures reduce cooling demands, enabling environmentally efficient data processing.Low Atmospheric Pressure
Ideal conditions for sealed, low-oxygen server environments that reduce fire risks and improve thermal control.Abundant Solar Exposure
The thin atmosphere allows high solar irradiance, powering next-generation energy grids for clean, sustainable operations.Physical Isolation
Off-world positioning creates the ultimate air-gapped environment for sensitive data, scientific simulations, and high-security computing.Mars is more than a destination—it’s a strategic frontier for the digital future.
Then consider other factors:
-Phobos and Demos to make power satellites out of, for beaming power down to the surface of Mars.
-Consider various large ice masses. The easy ones are at low latitudes, but the more valuable ones may be near or at the poles.
Mars is almost perfect, with the exception of dust storms.
Starting with Korolev Crater: and then graduating to the North and South ice caps.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korolev_(Martian_crater)
Image Quote: ![]()
If you have energy from Oribt and from the surface, you could use a laser beam to carve vaults and tunnels in the ice.
You could directly melt or evaporate the ice. There would be more efficient ways to do that however. You could route the water out of the ice body to a reservoir(s) perhaps around the edge of the ice body.
You then will have very large radiators.
Pressurized space in the ice modified with materials including those from mycelium, and heat pumps could make the spaces habitable for humans, robots, and Data Centers.
I think we might eventually find a way to modify the worst dust storms.
But perhaps at times the setup on Mars will hibernate until then.
So, why not make use of the cold and the expected waste heat to make Mars more valuable to the human race?
Even if Fission/Fusion becomes possible and competitive, we still have the cold of Mars as a resource.
Ending Pending ![]()