New Mars Forums

Official discussion forum of The Mars Society and MarsNews.com

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Announcement: This forum is accepting new registrations via email. Please see Recruiting Topic for additional information. Write newmarsmember[at_symbol]gmail.com.
  1. Index
  2. » Search
  3. » Posts by Void

#1 Re: Terraformation » Bipolar Mars Terraform Plan » Today 10:58:47

I want to briefly better define the direction of this.

I am being optimistic about Carbon on one or two of the Marian moon.  So, then I am hoping that for orbits of Mars, it may be possible to use CO and O2 combustion for propulsion.

Although it might be possible to spin up the tops with friction on Phobos or Deimos, I am moving towards a parent device that would spin the tops up with rotating magnetic fields.  So then the tops will become flywheels that store energy.

The parent devices might be powered in part with CO/O2 combustion, but for orbital position, and spin, other means may be available.  Perhaps Magdrive or Neumann Drive, perhaps an Oxygen mass driver that ejects Oxygen ice cubes.

So, these spinning tops would need a means to dip down to a small world like Phobos or Deimos, and gather some surface materials.

Then we need a means to rise back up to the parent devices.

We also have a need for a means to transfer the collected "Ore" from the "Flywheel-Tops"< and to the parent devices in Mars orbits.

The tops can also have electric systems in them including an energy source and perhaps batteries.

Some kind of thrusters sufficient for the linear path "Up and Down">

I would prefer to avoid use of combustion propellants, but do not exclude their use.

The parent devices would probably come in pairs, linked to each other so they would not continually build up more and more spin when the would push spin energy into the "Flywheel-Tops".

So, ideally this apparatus can at least partially refill various types of Spacecrafts with propellants.

Again, it may be needed to obtain Hydrogen from Mars itself.

Using mirrors in the orbits of Mars, the energy for this purpose should be relabel from solar energy, unlike the surface of Mars.

So, refilling ships in orbit may be better than to do so on the surface of Mars.  Although you will still want some refilling method on the surface of Mars.

A ship intending to go to Earth/Moon or the Asteroid belt would only need to rise up to orbit and be refilled there, so the refilling on the surface of Mars could be a "Small Partial" refilling.

Ending Pending smile

#2 Re: Terraformation » Bipolar Mars Terraform Plan » Yesterday 12:17:44

OK, I have this which may be more practical: c08zPt7.png

You get portions of the top filled with dust, and then you back away from Phobos and then you embed your crew compartments in the dirt.

You may have some synthetic gravity, and you may have sufficient radiation protection.  You may start processing the dirt, into various things.

The majority of the "Top" could be of fabrics, with some "Boning" added.

Ending Pending smile

#3 Re: Terraformation » Bipolar Mars Terraform Plan » Yesterday 11:27:55

So this device is beginning to look like a top: https://fity.club/lists/suggestions/Spinning-Top-Gif/
Image Quote: fake-spin.gif

We need to keep in mind that the gravity of Phobos and Deimos is rather low.

If it is possible to use the wheeled mouth method to draw dust into this spinning device.  If the bottom is too pointy and sinks in too much then it can be broadened out.

While dust will not naturally cling to all inner surfaces of the device, we can make slag bricks and put them into bags and fasten them to the inner surfaces, to create radiation protection.

I suppose it might even be possible to embed a Standford torus inside of the "Top".

NX2zTF4.png

It could be possible but perhaps not sensible.  But the "Top" dust eater is, I think a real possibility.

Ending Pending smile

#4 Re: Not So Free Chat » Void Postings » Yesterday 10:51:47

I would be willing to make an attempt which we might consider to be a precursor to a more professional work.  It is in my nature to do the minimum necessary, but I can try a little harder.

Paint allow some things well, other things not so much.  But perhaps I could try grinding on it a bit harder.

But I periodically change houses that I live in, and I am about to do so in the next days.  That takes up time. 

So, some patience is required.

Ending Pending smile

#5 Not So Free Chat » Greenland » Yesterday 06:47:15

Void
Replies: 4

A possible solution is to sell some of Greenland as for American National Interests.  Some money to Greenlanders, some to Denmark.

Let Denmark keep some of it for a price to be paid to the Greenlanders They may want some national parks, perhaps some monuments per the extinct Vikings.

Let the Greenlanders, establish their own state on what is left over.  And they may rent additional land that they choose to other actors.

The Greenlanders will be reasonably wealthy, and the Danes will not have to support them.

An agreement to keep out other actors who may be hostile to North America and possibly South America.  Currently Russian and China.

No Soup for them!  That is no hosting of hostile bases from other than the USA and Denmark and the Greenlanders.

I think that this could be satisfactory to America, Denmark, and the Greenlanders.

Monroe Doctrine reasonably satisfied as well.

Ending Pending smile

#6 Re: Terraformation » Bipolar Mars Terraform Plan » Yesterday 06:05:12

Continuing with the materials of the previous pos: CjVerbM.png

The wheels "Mouth" of the device do spinnies on the dirt of a world like Phobos.  They can also be steered to help spin the device; I guess.

But what grabs me now is the possible composition of the dust of Phobos.

Quote:

C-type rock
Phobos, the innermost moon of Mars, is primarily composed of C-type rock, similar to blackish carbonaceous chondrite asteroids. It appears to be covered with a layer of fine dust and fine-grained regolith, which is likely created by impacts from other bodies. The surface of Phobos has been heavily cratered and is characterized by a low density, suggesting a mixture of rock and possibly ice.

So without as much optimism if we presume some Carbon and some Oxidized Metals, we are quite close to what Starship needs for filling.

If it is presumed that Hydrogen has to come from the surface of Mars, but Photos does have Carbon and Oxygen, so math may help to understand.

In Starship the weight of Oxygen/Methane is about ~3.6/1

What is the weight of Carbon and Hydrogen?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon
Quote:

Standard atomic weight Ar°(C)
[12.0096, 12.0116][1]
12.011±0.002 (abridged)[2]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen
Quote:

Standard atomic weight Ar°(H)
[1.00784, 1.00811][1]
1.0080±0.0002 (abridged)[2]

So with math made crude, can I think that in CH4, the Carbon has 12 of the total weight and the four Hydrogens have 4 of the total weight of a Methane molecule?

So, by lifting Hydrogen from Mars, we are lifting the minority of the weight of the fuel which is the minority of the propellants for Starship?

Oxygen/Methane = 3.6/1
Carbon/Hydrogen = 12/4

So a process of refilling from Phobos may be very useful for Starship.

The Stoke Space 2nd Stage may be very useful to lift Hydrogen from the surface of Mars to assist this process to support Starship.

*If there is both Carbon and Oxygen and no Hydrogen in Phobos, it might be useful to have a Oxygen/Co2 propulsion system to use in orbit of Mars.  Perhaps the Dust Eater could use it to maneuver.

But this looks pretty hopeful, if Carbon is included in the dust of Phobos, and perhaps also Deimos.

Ending Pending smile

#7 Re: Terraformation » Bipolar Mars Terraform Plan » 2026-01-05 17:13:50

OK, I would like to take this a bit further.

Although I would like to Start with a Starship that could enter orbit that may or may not be an option.

1) In accordance with the current plans for Starship on Mars, we will expect to land a Starship on Mars, and refill it and then ascend to Phobos or Deimos to work with it.

2) Alternately using Electric Ion propulsion, we may push a Starship and the mining device from the previous post to proximity of Phobos or Deimos.  This would be stuffed with water ice and CO2 ice but no Oxygen or Methane.  We may need some kind of long term storage propulsion method included such as for the Super Drako's of Dragon.  When it is in place we might try to air brake a starship with humans in it to Mars orbit, or we have to do the method of #1.

If we have the Ice and CO2 Starship in orbit we can put a small cabin in it shielded by these that can host the humans and protect them from radiation.  So probably most of the Cabin and Cargo areas will be occupied by these.  The Oxygen and Methane tanks will be mostly empty, perhaps header tanks will be filled, using some of the water and CO2 and making Oxygen and Methane.

So, we attach this to one or more Starships in an assembly and begin collecting dust regolith into the collection bag.
(This is from the prior Post): NcEhtyT.png

We might have to consume some propellants to do this, to provide the spin and the action to press it into the target.

Once it is filled, we may park a Starship inside of it, and perhaps maintain just a little spin to keep the dust in place.  We need a power supply and a method to bring portions of dust into a maker of some kind, to process it into Oxygen, Iron, and Slag Bricks.

The objective is work up to something much bigger from another post from another topic: https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 28#p236828  A modification of something like this: PhdnSka.png

The work begins as tedious and slow, but over time this pyramid scheme grows and more and more humans and robots get aboard.

Dust Eather or a modification of it can extend from a much larger structure and go and take bites out of an object and disgorge them into the latest collection chamber.

It is thought by some that Phobos and/or Deimos have Carbon.  They will certainly have Oxygen and Iron.  Hydrogen is a bit of a wild card.  If necessary, it can be brought up from Mars itself by Starships as part of Ammonia which could be stored.

So, this sort of a skeleton of a notion.

If it could work out, then large amounts of Oxygen and Iron may be available as propellants in Mars orbits.  Having Ammonia and Oxygen various propulsion schemes may be possible, including Oxygen/Ammonia, and Oxygen/Methane.  These would not be dependent on surface solar energy, but more reliable orbital solar energy.

You would only need to make Ammonia, and enough Oxygen and Methane on the Surface to get to Phobos or Deimos.  Then you could be refilled for landing, rinse and repeat.  The Ammonia could be used to react with regolith and produce water, and I presume Nitrous Oxide.  Well once you had the water you could keep splitting it, to repeat the reduction of metal Oxides.

Perhaps it would make sense to have an Ammonia/Oxygen engine in the orbits of Mars?

Well, lets call it a "Maybe": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reaction_Motors_XLR99

Maybe Jet Fuel, or RP-1 would be good.  If you could make it on the surface of Mars, then lift it with raptors, then it could be reacted with regolith while heated, in order to reduce the regolith.

Well, I think I will leave it at that. 

I am in favor of having humans both on Mars and in orbit of Mars.  To be in orbit you need good life support with protection but in some ways, the environment is better, some ways worse.

Ending Pending smile

#8 Re: Terraformation » Bipolar Mars Terraform Plan » 2026-01-05 14:00:59

I am on to something now that involves several things.  I will provide several items of reference and then begin a proposal of device.

>>>>

In a polite manner I will ask that if I discuss a corset, the thought police will abstain from seeking sexualized power in relationship to that conversation.  To make that easier, I will mention a Male Corset.  Example: https://www.missleatheronline.com/blogs … orsets-101  Image Quote: mens-corsets-101_1200x.jpg?v=1711017710  (I think I look very nice) 

I I say "Boning in a Corset", this is what is indicated: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bone_(corsetry)
Quote:

In corsetry, a bone is one of the rigid parts of a corset that forms its frame and gives it rigidity.

>>>>

I am also interested in the outer profile of a Cone Snail.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cone_snail
Image Quote: 1280px-Textile_cone.JPG

>>>>

OK some very smart people came up with an idea that I would like to take further.
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/as … 45363/full
Image Quote: fspas-08-645363-g001.jpg

>>>>

I am hoping to devise a method to harvest dust from a dust pond on an asteroid: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dust_ponds
Quote:

Dust ponds are a phenomenon where pockets of dust are seen in celestial bodies without a significant atmosphere, like asteroids, comets and some minor planets. These are smooth deposits of dust accumulated in depressions on the surface of the body (like craters), contrasting from the rocky terrain around them.[1] They typically have different color and albedo compared to the surrounding areas. As there are no air around them, their method of formation is still debated. The phenomenon was discovered on 2000 October 28, by the spaceprobe NEAR Shoemaker on Asteroid 433 Eros.[2]

  Image Quote: Itokawa06_hayabusa.jpg

>>>>

Although I want to make this device sort of universal, my prime targets are Phobos and Deimos.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phobos_(moon)
Image Quote: 960px-Phobos_colour_2008.jpg

https://science.nasa.gov/solar-system/m … in-powder/
Quote:

100 meters thick
Phobos, the innermost moon of Mars, is covered with a layer of fine-grained regolith, which is believed to be at least 100 meters thick. This regolith is formed by impacts from other bodies and is composed of very small particles that lose heat rapidly due to the extreme temperature variations on the moon.
NASA
+2

>>>>

I wish to make a device that can "Eat" dust from the surface of such a little world, and make a radiation shield and also make the appropriated raw materials into a path to other resources.

A pause for a drawing.................

NcEhtyT.png

The device has multiple wheels which spin and can be steered.  The device is intended to make mouth contact with the dust source and in ingest it by spinning the wheels.  The Wheels can also impart additional spin or reduce spin of the whole device.

Vibrations induced may provide fluid flow of the dust.  Further internal robots may move some of the dust about th redistribute it.

The ability to manipulate the device while not in contact with the dust source is perhaps thrusters.  Or an arm that extends from a larger mass above the Dust Eater.

The Dust Eater might be constructed in Earth orbit of light materials such as a fabric.  It may be "Boned" in the sense of a corset with some stiffeners, perhaps wires.

It might be flown to a target object such as Phobos or Bennu and be used to ingest materials of the object.

When the ingestion is complete, spacecraft with people can be placed inside to provide radiation protection and to begin processing the materials.

Should this prove workable, then a Starship might land on Mars, generate a little Oxygen and a lot of Methane on Mars.  Fly to orbit and obtain Oxygen from this device.

Or Magdrive or Neuman Drive spacecraft may obtain Iron from it.

The materials of Phobos and Deimos most likely could make Iron, Oxygen, and Slag Bricks.  Over time the Briks could be used to make shelters in orbit.

So, this can probably use some improvements and planning additions, but I think it may have some merit.

Ending Pending smile

#9 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Multi-Ship Expeditions, Starboat & Starship, Other. » 2026-01-04 13:21:35

(th) per: https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 70#p236870

I am glad we have a mutual interest.  I did read "The High Frontier" so I understand to some extent what their proposals were.

They hoped to send sacks of Moon regolith by way of a Mass Driver from the Moon to one of the two stable "L" points.

They intended to fine tune the path of the sacks using an electron beam, I believe.  Then they hoped to have the sack rip open on a obstacle and the contents to spill into a rotating drum.

Probably not really workable, as it may cause a lot of trouble with equipment where it might get sand blasted.

But you have to start with a concept and try to make alterations until you can make it work, so they disserve lots of credit for their efforts.

I have seen notions that it is possible to accrete planets in an L4 or L5 zone, in this case Sun/Planet.  But I would like to try accretion into an L4 or L5 Earth/Moon situation.

We appear to have two candidate Matter Projectors the Neumann Drive and the Magdrive.  For sure they will both project Iron, Aluminum, and Copper.  The Neumann Drive can project most items in the Element Table, if they are conductive of electricity.

The High Frontier concept intended that bags of regolith flung off of the Moon would slow down as they approached the "L" point.  Perhaps to hundreds of miles an hour.

Now I will attempt to adapt that.  If we can tame our Matter Projector, to not go full throttle, perhaps we can get the spray to enter L4 or L5 at a reasonable speed.  IF we could use the solar wind to slow it down enough, we might get a capture into the orbit of L4 or L5.  So, the hope is to get is dusty and then accrete the dust.

Easier to say than do, I am sure.

If we can magnetize the dust, (In the case of Iron), then maybe we can get it to clump together).  Possibly an electron beam sweep could magnetize it, just a guess.  Where there is a electric flow, there should be a magnetic field.

But to use the Solar wind to break the dust, it needs to be of a small size, But if we can make it clump up perhaps the solar wind will not sweep it out of the "L4" or "L5" zone.  We also could think to make a massive magnetic field using superconductors, that device to orbit in a "L4 or L5.

So, in that case if we could get the solar wind to deflect the dust towards the magnetic field, it might spill into it an accrete.

For Iron which is below its curie point in temperature, this might work.  For other metals that may have eddy currents, this possibly might work, not sure.  I am not inclined to think that we could catch Oxygen or Oxide materials that I am familiar with.

But if we could project Iron from the Moon and Accrete it to a L4 or L5 location that would be huge.  Because it would be a building material and can be used as propellant in a Neumann Drive or Magdrive.

I might hope that Steel could be used in a Neumann Drive or Magdrive, and that the particles would be Steel, but I suspect that those alloys would be torn apart.  And Steel is typically not very magnetic.

It is possible that we could try to use electrostatics to accrete materials projected to L4 or L5, but I am relatively unsure.

If you wanted to keep either L4 or L5 clean for test equipment like Telescopes you might be able to do that as there are two of them.

Ending Pending smile

#10 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Multi-Ship Expeditions, Starboat & Starship, Other. » 2026-01-04 11:22:50

It may make sense at some point to bring back the "L4" and "L5" locations into our thinking, perhaps even without a Mass Driver(s) on the Moon. 

That if from the era of Gerard K. O'Neill: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerard_K._O%27Neill
https://www.thespacereview.com/article/2882/1
Image Quote: 2882a.jpg

"L4" and "L5" are like gravitational bowls as I understand ti.
"L1" and "L2" and "L3" are like upside down gravitational bowls.

You can center mass in the upright ones, and it will tend to stay in a sort of bowl like orbit.
You can center mass in the upside-down ones, but it will tend to move "Downhill" at increasing speeds.

This diagram may help to illustrate, but it is not proportional: TaaSBeH.png

So, "L4" and "L5" are like bowls, so objects with low speed will tend to orbit inside of them.  That way sloppy activities may keep the mess contained.  These might also be good places to travel to elsewhere in the solar system.

Ending Pending smile

#11 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Multi-Ship Expeditions, Starboat & Starship, Other. » 2026-01-04 10:23:52

Perhaps it is not known yet, for practicality, I am interested to understand if it is possible to extract Oxygen from the Moon to use even at LEO?

There is some feeling that a Mass Driver is needed to make that practical.  But a Mass Driver is like and Chicken and Egg puzzle.  IF you don't have a process on the Moon to produce a cargo of value then their is no reason for a Mass Driver.  But perhaps if you build a productive process on the Moon and don't have a Mass Driver, then what good is that productive process?

So, the I have a hope, of a transport method that is less than an Mass Driver that can service a productive process on the Moon, until a mass driver process is justified.

So, we might consider the products to move to LEO, from the Moon, Iron and Oxygen.  We could also consider Iron Oxide.

Oxygen if of considerable value, but if you have to make it as a liquid on the Moon, and then transport it to orbit.  Then you have to keep it from boiling off.  That then requires excess mass to keep it liquid.  But Iron Oxide, may bring the useful substances Oxygen and Iron to LEO.

It will not boil, but we face a problem to overcome, that if your Iron Oxide is in the wrong form you might crated a collision pattern if your transport ship explodes.  So, size may matter.  Perhaps dust would be swept away.  Perhaps large chunks could be salvaged and cleared. 

So, Medium size might be the worst.  You have to be aware of sabotage.  Some people see you are servants that should not be going into space but should be serving their desires.  They are slavers.  Sometimes they can even be Leftists.  Baby Kings, that see their poopy diaper as the best use for you.  You are here to change their poopy diapers.

So we want a best process that is not any more vulnerable to Baby Kings than is necessary.

So, if we can bring Iron Oxide to a LEO refinery, where Hydrogen and solar energy, could be used to separate the Iron and Oxygen.  So, then you can use the Oxygen for chemical processes, such as breathing and rockets.  You can also use Oxygen Ice Cubes for propellants in a certain type of Mass Driver propulsion system.  You may use the Iron for building structures, and for propellant for Neumann Drive and MagDrive.

These then can help then to send cargos outward to higher orbits, even to the Moon and beyond.

I do not know if this a virtuous or not.  Is it profitable?  Well we may want to find out.

We did something like that in the Taconite Mines.  We separated magnetic Iron from tailings.  Then we had a concentrate That would be glued with clay and baked into pellets.  So, then the pellets could be made primarily of Iron, Oxygen, and Silica.  It was then suitable to transport and be of a good shape and size for a blast furnace.

On the Moon we may or may not want other substances in the mix than Iron and Oxygen.  Pure Iron and Oxygen may be harder to make, but you may or may not want to have the Silicon in LEO.

Silicon has uses though.  And Silicon can be used in Neumann Drive, I am not sure it can be used in  Magdrive for propulsion.

Anyway, if shipping can be accomplished from the Moon from LEO, that is gainful in result, perhaps eventually when the productive processes on the Moon are large enough, a Mass Driver(s) will be justified, and so the investment money can be justified to build one or more of them.

This is why I have suggested that parallel engines be put onto a Starship.  Such parallel engines which may run on propellants, Hydrogen and Oxygen, or Water and Aluminum may be derived from local Lunar Resources.

While it might be said, "Why don't you just have a Hydro-Lox" ship?  Well, a possible answer if boil off.

IF you have Liquid Hydrogen on the Moon, you can afford to have massive active cooling for that.  But a ship which has both Metha-Lox and Hydro-Lox engines could work like this.  The Hydrogen would be filled into the Ship along with Oxygen from the Moon.  I presume for now that the Methane comes from Earth.  The ship uses both the Methane and Hydrogen engines to lift off from the Moon.  All the Hydrgen is consumed.  It has a lot of power but now it is gone.  You continue with the Methane.   You do not need active cooling for the Hydrogen on the ship or in orbit as it has all been burned.  The Ship lifted a cargo, perhaps of Iron Oxide, and delivers it to a transport.  The ship is refilled in orbit with more Methane and then it goes ahead and lands back on the Moon, using only then Metha-Lox Engines.  The empty Hydrogen tanks and Hydro-Lox engines ride along.

Rinse and repeat.

You might use Alice Engines instead of Hydro-Lox engines.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ALICE_%28propellant%29

Then of course you need nano-powder Aluminum and water Ice.

Ending Pending smile

#12 Re: Not So Free Chat » Peter Zeihan again: and also other thinkers: » 2026-01-04 09:23:15

https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … bed440366e  Quote:

Tom Luongo exposes what’s really going on with TRUMP & MADURO
YouTube
CRYPTO RICH POLITICS
2 views

Those who ware globally oriented, might think that just because I place this video here, I must be in their camp.

Yes, I see some of their perspective.  I am not against them but I am not yet willing to sign up to their hexarchy.  I expect that they don't want to run a Hierarchy.

I could tell you why the head of the church of England and the pope offend me.  They think that the world should be centered under their feet.  I do not dispute their religion, rather I dispute their authority to be justified to play Judas, and nail our people to crosses.  They are naturally globalists, so as they run parallel to the non-Christian Globalists.  When the give assistance to the enemy, they can never win my allegiance.

That only goes as far as I do not accept their criticisms.  I am offended by what they say.

We have plenty of Churches here that do not bless the Globalists.  I would prefer those, Christians.  And so my feelings are similar about the judgements that Europeans may cast against us.  I am repulsed and offended.

We tried Globalism, and may try it again someday, maybe 80 years from now, but it is deeply infected by parasitic processes.  Doing the opposite in this next 80-100 years, may offer a way to scrape the parasites off our bodies.

It is probably better that you adapt to this new reality.

Ending Pending smile

#13 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Multi-Ship Expeditions, Starboat & Starship, Other. » 2026-01-03 12:55:39

Please note that this post refers also to the prior post that was made today.

The value of Iron Oxide in space.

I wish to add Iron Oxide to the list of materials from the prior post:

So, now that we have slow-bulk propulsion methods, we then can begin in basic bulk cargo, and then expand that to less basic.

Basic:
-Metals, Carbon, Silicon (These can be use as propellants also, at least in Neumann Drive).
-Carbon (As a ingredient for Hydrocarbon Fuels).
-Water.

Expanded Basic:
-RP-1 Fuel.
-A water/Peroxide Mix (Needs to not be explosive).
-Other??? (To be determined).

Now:

So, now that we have slow-bulk propulsion methods, we then can begin in basic bulk cargo, and then expand that to less basic.

Basic:
-Metals, Carbon, Silicon (These can be use as propellants also, at least in Neumann Drive).
-Carbon (As a ingredient for Hydrocarbon Fuels).
-Water.
-Iron Oxide.

Expanded Basic:
-RP-1 Fuel.
-A water/Peroxide Mix (Needs to not be explosive).
-Other??? (To be determined).

If you have some Hydrogen and a source of heat, you may reduce the Iron Oxide and make water.
Then you may spilt the water and reuse the Hydrogen in the same manner.
Then if you have a mass driver that can expel Oxygen Ice Cubes, you may use Oxygen as a propellant.
Then you may use the Iron in a Neumann Driver or Magdrive.

So, it is my hope that Iron and Oxygen can be refined on the Moon and contrary to what some might think wise the Iron can be Oxidized.
Then if a Spaceship lifts the Iron Oxide to Lunar Orbit, you have lifted a "Pure" propellant to Orbit.

The cost for this then includes the propellants, the LOX from the Moon and the fuel from ???  (The Moon or Earth, or other).

But if the effectiveness of the Oxygen and Iron propellants is valuable enough then the propellants for the Spaceship may be justified.

Ending Pending smile

#14 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Multi-Ship Expeditions, Starboat & Starship, Other. » 2026-01-03 10:22:32

So, I think that a greater awareness of this can be verbalized.

Humans may prefer to cross distances at high speeds, but on Earth such high speeds are supported by slower bulk transfers.  The devices for these transfers can be Barges, Pipelines, Railroads, and other slow bulk traffic.

In space due to the perishable nature of humans we have focused on higher speeds for humans and also the bulk materials.  We have modified this with concepts of Insitu production on other worlds, but the high-speed movement of bulk cargo, is not a good way to do things.

The Australians have initiated the Neumann Drive, and the British have initiated the Magdrive.  My impression is that the USA is now partially involved in both.  These drives may be reasonable analogs in space for the means of bulk transfers that we use on Earth. (Barges, Pipelines, Railroads, and other slow bulk traffic)  We could still try to use Argon with a pinch of Xenon, but metal propellants are more universal, and more easily stored and obtained, I think.

So, now that we have slow-bulk propulsion methods, we then can begin in basic bulk cargo, and then expand that to less basic.

Basic:
-Metals, Carbon, Silicon (These can be use as propellants also, at least in Neumann Drive).
-Carbon (As a ingredient for Hydrocarbon Fuels).
-Water.

Expanded Basic:
-RP-1 Fuel.
-A water/Peroxide Mix (Needs to not be explosive).
-Other??? (To be determined).

The Basic and Expanded Basic are substances that are relatively low maintenance materials that can be kept inert with minimal efforts.

So, the Neumann Drive and Magdrive devices will mostly be robotic, I expect.

In general, these substances can double to provide radiation protection on platforms that will use solar energy or even nuclear energy to convert the substances into alternate substances such as fuels and Oxidizers.

A system of platforms then might support the higher speed traffic which at times may move humans.

In a prior post I have suggested various places for stations, but a ship on a path would not have to use all of them.  They would be options.
Each stop carries risks but also offers assistance.

A Ship from LEO, might be able to stop at a platform in LEO, GEO, L1, and Lunar Orbits, but Maybe it would only stop off at LEO and L1 to refill.

And of course a system like this could be expanded to include other worlds as well.

Pause................

I really hope that a Mass Driver for the Moon, or many of them can be successfully created.

But some people have said "Its the little things that count.

So I have a Space Mollusk concept for little worlds.  We can start with Phobos and Deimos, and then maybe some of the Earth crossing asteroids, and then perhaps the nearer main asteroid belt at about 2.1 AU.

I need a drawing......pause.............

PhdnSka.png

So the assembly has periodic uploading of raw materials, into partially completed chambers, and then the chamber is completed, it can be pressurized.  The cone has a very low partial gravity applied to allow Filling events.

As each filled segment has its raw materials processed, it converts from a raw material bin into an expanded location of factory production.  The next segment is then partial built from the processed raw materials that have become resources.

For larger objects like Phobos and Deimos, a method to fling materials into the new segment on a periodic basis is needed.

For the location in the asteroid belt at 2.1 AU, it may be that tiny asteroids can be captured into a segment, like as if it were a mollusks stomach.

https://www.nasa.gov/solar-system/aster … roid-belt/
Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Asteroid Belt
Recent observations using the James Webb Space Telescope have revealed a population of tiny asteroids in the main asteroid belt, marking a significant advancement in our understanding of these celestial bodies.
Discovery of Small Asteroids
A team of researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has identified 138 new asteroids in the main asteroid belt, which lies between Mars and Jupiter. These asteroids range in size from that of a bus to a small stadium, representing the smallest asteroids ever detected in this region. This discovery was made possible by repurposing data from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), which was originally collected for other astronomical studies.
NASA
+1
Significance of the Findings
The detection of these tiny asteroids provides valuable insights into the formation and evolution of asteroids in our solar system. According to Tom Greene, an astrophysicist at NASA, these small objects likely formed from collisions between larger asteroids in the main belt. Understanding their sizes and numbers helps scientists learn about the history of asteroid collisions and how some asteroids may escape the main belt and potentially become near-Earth objects.
NASA
+1
Implications for Planetary Defense
The findings have important implications for planetary defense. Smaller asteroids, often referred to as decameter asteroids (measuring tens of meters across), are more likely to migrate towards Earth. These asteroids can cause significant damage if they enter the atmosphere, as seen in events like the Chelyabinsk meteor incident in 2013. The ability to detect and track these small asteroids at greater distances enhances our capacity to assess potential threats to Earth.
Space.com
+1
Conclusion
The discovery of these tiny asteroids not only fills a critical gap in our knowledge of the asteroid belt but also aids in the ongoing efforts to monitor and mitigate potential asteroid impacts on Earth. The research highlights the capabilities of the James Webb Space Telescope in advancing our understanding of the solar system.
MIT - Massachusetts Institute of Technology

So, eventually if the segment cross section becomes large enough an object like Bennu might be enveloped inside of it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/101955_Bennu
Quote:

Dimensions    565 m × 535 m × 508 m (1854 ft × 1755 ft × 1667 ft)[1]
Mean radius    245.03±0.08 m (804±0.262 ft)
Equatorial radius    282.37±0.06 m (926.4±0.197 ft)
Polar radius    249.25±0.06 m (817.74±0.197 ft)
Surface area    0.782±0.004 km2 (0.302±0.002 mi2)
Volume    0.0615±0.0001 km3
Mass    (7.329±0.009)×1010 kg
Mean density    1.190±0.013 g/cm3
Equatorial surface gravity    6.27 micro-g[6] (61.5 μm/s2)

My drawing suggests that the walls between segments would be flat, but of course they would be curved, either concave or convex, to be able to hold air pressure.  But it might not be necessary to have a human rated air pressure.  The air inside might be toxic anyway.

A bulk airlock might move batches of materials from a raw materials segment to a processing segment.

The means of propulsion may very well be Neumann Drive, or Magdrive, or maybe mass driver.  After all a mass driver can through things out like excess Oxygen to do a propulsion.

So, then these "Space Mollusks" could export and import substances from other platforms in the solar system.

In order for such a platform to get materials from Phobos and Deimos, they might have a turntable under the raw materials segment, so that they could land on such an object and spin.   That of course has to be done correctly to be a gainful event rather than a disaster.

Ending Pending smile

#15 Re: Not So Free Chat » Peter Zeihan again: and also other thinkers: » 2026-01-03 08:52:21

I had a dream that was partly lucid about buying a new suit that was very heavy, and had at least 50 Dickies in it.
These seemed to be all different plaids though: https://www.amazon.com/turtleneck-dicki … eck+dickie

I wasn't sure I wanted it but I wondered after taking it apart if I could put it back together again.

Then I woke up and found an unexplained puddle of water on my kitchen floor.

Then I listened to a video that made me wonder if the world is about tiny, brained people behaving in bogus manners, not really understanding, but trying to out-bogus each other?

I will see if I can get the video: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … ac1e3bf29f  Quote:

Trump's Silver Bullet: The End of Britain's Financial Empire!
YouTube
CRYPTO RICH POLITICS

My brain is full.

Pause......................

So, if this had occurred before we had Shale Oil, I am thinking that we would have to buy Foreign Oil with weak dollars.  But this is not currently a problem.  We also have food and fairly good water.

I think I dimly understand.

Our dollar low is an encouragement for foreign people to convert their currency to dollars and buy American produces.  I think.  Tariffs, discourage Americans from buying foreign goods with our weak dollars.

I do keep trying from time to time but I the end I have to plead stupid.  I see glimmers, but not the picture.

Ending Pending smile





We might avoid too much inflation, as we have quite al lot of resources internal to our country.

#16 Re: Exploration to Settlement Creation » This title has no meaning » 2026-01-02 12:21:06

Here is an intrusion that you may ignore, as I do not wish to make the members unhappy: https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 90#p236790

Ending Pending smile

#17 Re: Terraformation » Bipolar Mars Terraform Plan » 2026-01-02 11:52:41

I feel compelled to interfere indirectly with this other topic: https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 70#p236770
Quote:

kbd512
Administrator
Registered: 2015-01-02
Posts: 8,380
Email
I think an ad-hoc / in-situ garage implies using a natural terrain feature that can function as a garage, such as a cave, or something carved into a rock face.  My assumption is that this garage primarily houses earth moving equipment.

Iron mining requires:
Drill rigs to create blasting holes
Excavators to scoop up the regolith
Drag lines for surface mining
Bulldozers to push piles of regolith around the job site
Haul trucks

To process the regolith into ore:
Rock crushers
Shakers and screens to separate larger rock chips from finer chips
Grinding mills to reduce the rock chips to a fine powder
Electromagnetic ore separators
Heaters to de-water hydrated minerals

Equipment used to drill wells would also be fabricated, repaired, and stored in unpressurized garages.

By necessity you will need to be near a large ice slab that can be 130 feet deep.

In the process of mining ice by shaft, you can make a garage.  You could create a ramp which you could surface deeply with sized regolith.

As the ice tunnel may experience mass wasting you might expand your tunnel and spray cold steam on the walls of the original "Garage", to replace what is lost.


While not perfect, this system would likely maintain fairly constant temperatures and would be somewhat radiation protected.

Non ice structure might be used to strengthen the arch of the tunnel arch,  For instance fibers of some kind could be pressed to the arch walls while you sprayed cold steam to condense and glue it to the arch walls.  You might also deploy vapor barriers to keep the mass wasting down in magnitude.

IF you had a door to close the tunnel entrance then you might use a heat pump system to pull heat out of the garage and to send it deeper in the tunnels to extend the tunnels.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

As for Iron Mining, it would be sensible to simply extract Iron from Mars soils.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Composition_of_Mars
Quote:

Iron oxides
The soil of Mars, known as regolith, is primarily composed of fine-grained basaltic rock fragments and minerals altered by water. It is enriched in iron oxides, giving Mars its distinctive red color, primarily due to ferric oxide (Fe2O3). The chemical composition of Martian soil includes elements like silicon, oxygen, iron, magnesium, aluminum, and calcium, with key minerals such as plagioclase feldspar, pyroxene, and olivine. The presence of iron in the soil is significant, as Mars has twice as much iron oxide in its outer layers compared to Earth, reflecting its geological history and the weathering of volcanic rocks.
Wikipedia
+4

You may eliminate much of the drilling, blasting and crushing, and just work with an "Ore" of fine materials that you can beneficiate.

Here might be a way: https://www.csiro.au/en/news/All/Articl … 0on%20Mars.  Quote:

Key points
Swinburne and CSIRO researchers are investigating ways to produce native metals using materials found on Mars.
Martian settlements will require large amounts of metal that are difficult to ship from Earth.
The team have successfully produced iron using regolith simulant that mimics what is available on the Red Planet.

Another way is to reduce the Iron in the soil by baking it in a Hydrogen bath or perhaps CO bath.  Then the reduced Iron can be extracted using magnetism.  The Concentrate then can be used is quality Iron ore and processed by a modern Hydrogen type Steel process, I think.

And here is a beneficiation process that involves biology: https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 47#p236747
Quote:

Now I stumbled on something Calliban might like: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8081250/
Quote:

Iron can be microbially extracted from Lunar and Martian regolith simulants and 3D printed into tough structural materials

  Image Quote: pone.0249962.g001.jpg

So, really all you may want is to screen Mars soils and to beneficiate them to then make Iron from the concentrated result.

And so you can better make your garage with or without ice tunneling.

Ending Pending smile

#18 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Multi-Ship Expeditions, Starboat & Starship, Other. » 2026-01-02 09:24:13

Orbital Water Platforms:

Expanding a bit on previous posting, It seems to me that water as a cargo to orbit could be rather ideal to a large extent.

A Starship lifting water, is less explosive than a Starship lifting extra Methane and Oxygen.  So, there may be a degree of increased safety at a Earth Launch pad.

Water being liquid at temperatures often compatible with humans also has utility as it can shield from radiation and you also can use it to grow food.  Growing food in it gives some complications to then make propellants but it could be done.

In cracking the water to make propellants you would perhaps get an Oxygen imbalance that you could use.  Let's say you would split the water to Hydrogen and Oxygen continually.  You might use some of the Hydrogen for station keeping or even to move the platform a little bit.
I am presuming that a high temperature thruster could be used to expel a trickling stream of Hydrogen for that purpose.  So then you would accumulate LOX into tanks.

So, ignoring other means of transport for the moment and concentrating on Starship, you also be able to bring Carbon in a form usable but of a form that will not cause dust explosions if launch goes badly.  Then if you do not want to dump all the Hydrogen produced you may make Liquid Methane from some of it.

So, water and Carbon Feedstock would be relatively benign in nature.  And both may be useful for radiation shielding.

But such a platform may service a Stoke Space 2nd stage also, if you elect to make and store Liquid Hydrogen.

Some locations for such platformer might be LEO+, GEO, L1, and Lunar orbits.

Keep in mind that I am thinking that for many of these Magdrive and/or Neumann Drive would be used in transporting bulk cargos like water and Carbon.  Neither Water or Carbon will require active cooling, I expect, so that makes the task easier.

https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … &FORM=VIRE
Quote:

Stoke Space Second Stage: High Performance and Reusable within 24 Hours of Landing
YouTube
Space Startup News
5.4K views

"Andromeda"

https://www.stokespace.com/introducing-andromeda/
Quote:

Introducing Andromeda, our rapidly reusable high-performance upper-stage rocket engine
Updated design upgrades performance, simplicity, and rapid reusability.

I have wondered if a "Supersized" Andromeda, might be lifted by SpaceX Superheavy.

But perhaps it is better to keep it small as then the batch of Liquid Hydrogen you have to maintain ot refill an Andromeda, would be of a smaller and more manageable size.

I think that there might be some advantages in refilling a ship in the vacuum of space outside the Earths atmosphere.  Perhaps less risk of explosions from Hydrogen spills/leaks.

So, there would be a distinction between ships intended to lift Water, Carbon, Metal Propellants to LEO+ and ships intended to navigate further out.

The further out ships might have smaller propellant tanks, and so less dry mass from the container and from that which is contained.  These might refill at LEO+, GEO, L1, and Lunar Orbits, and indeed on the surface of the Moon.  They also might not normally land on the surface of the Earth.

While at first all the Water, Carbon, and Metal Propellants will come from the Earth, eventually some may come from the Moon, and then later even from Photos, Deimos, Asteroids, and Mars.

Again Water, Carbon, and Metal Propellants could be kept benign during long trips to the Earth/Moon from those remote locations.

Ending Pending smile

This alternate Moon formation theory is of some interest.  It may suggest a different history and perhaps a different nature of raw materials on the Moon that can be made into resources.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technolo … r-AA1SkA7u  Quote:

What really created the moon? Scientists say it’s not just one impact, but this many!
Story by Sarah Jones • 2w •
3 min read

That is interesting, so what if the far side and near side materials are largely from two different objects?  And then perhaps some materials from the Earth?

Ending Pending smile

#19 Re: Terraformation » The Moon » 2026-01-01 22:18:28

I have to appreciate what China has discovered on the Moon: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … f953b99849  Quote:

The Moon Is Lying to Us — What China Found

Lunar soil is speculated to contain "hundreds of billions of tons of water."  (Stated a 9.22 in the video).  And I believe this does not refer to possible polar ice deposits.

https://blog.sciandnature.com/2025/01/c … es-us.html
Quote:

HomeAstronomyChina's New Moon Discovery Leaves the U.S. Stunned and Rewrites History
China's New Moon Discovery Leaves the U.S. Stunned and Rewrites History

There is Nitrogen in the Lunar soil, perhaps from Earth: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature03929
So, with Water and Carbon in the Lunar soil it is possible to have agriculture on the Moon, I speculate.

So, perhaps if we have a refilling station at the Earth/Moon "L1", water might come from the Moon eventually maybe even Carbon.

Ending Pending smile

#20 Re: Science, Technology, and Astronomy » Humanoid and other robots. » 2026-01-01 21:27:04

I thought I would have a look at the projected relative cost for Cybercab by Tesla.  It is basically an "Other" robot, on wheels.

https://www.greencarreports.com/news/11 … ut-details
Quote:

Around 20 cents per mile
The cost per mile for the Tesla Cybercab is projected to be around 20 cents per mile in operating costs, with total costs estimated at 30 to 40 cents per mile when including taxes and other expenses. Tesla aims to keep the Cybercab priced under $30,000, making it a competitive option in the autonomous transportation market.

https://www.nerdwallet.com/auto-loans/l … 719e2f6ea5
Quote:

Approximately $11,577 annually
The average cost of owning a car is approximately $11,577 annually according to AAA's 2025 study. This figure includes various expenses such as insurance, maintenance, fuel, and depreciation. In contrast, the average cost of a new car is around $48,759, while used cars average about $26,446.
NerdWallet
+2

So, $11,577 / 365 = $31.71 a day ????

So, you can afford 105.73 miles per day in Cybercab to equal the expense of the average car, if Cybercab costs $0.30 per mile????
So, you can afford  79.29 miles per day in Cybercab to equal the expense of the average car, if cybercab costs $0.40 per mile????

I have to double check the above.

I don't know if there will be a difference between Cybercab and Robovan.

Perhaps Robovan may be more for between cities.

But if you ride in these you could read and text, etc.

So, a cultural change, if it works out.  Many people may drop the ownership of a car, and perhaps not own a car at all.  That may reduce CO2 emissions and energy consumption.

This will render the USA not so stupid after all compared to mass transit in other countries.  This will be relatively pandemic proof.

Covid was not transmitted much by touch, and the cars will be cleaned I think I recall.

Also, as a method of travel for criminal activity it will be a poor choice as the records of who, when, and where will be extensive.
So, maybe easier for the police to diagnose criminal patterns.

Reprimand me if the math is wrong.

Ending Pending smile

#21 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Multi-Ship Expeditions, Starboat & Starship, Other. » 2026-01-01 14:52:24

Well (th) I will entertain your query: https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 55#p236755
Quote:

For Void re Falcon 1 landing on the Moon ....

I don't know the answer to this, and would be interested if you can find out.

My question is inspired by your recent post about possibly using Falcon 9 upper stage as a Moon lander.

Can the Falcon 9 upper stage land on the Moon?

How does the Falcon 9 upper stage land on Earth?

If the Falcon 9 upper stage cannot currently land on Earth, what would it take to give it that ability?

Is it technically feasible?  I assume it must be because others than SpaceX have landed on the Moon.

In reading my question, I realized you might be thinking of the first stage as a Moon lander,. and that is why you suggested sending the stage to orbit using a Starship?

May I have your permission to revise my question?  Can the Falcon 9 first stage land on the Moon?

Does the Falcon 9 use GPS to know it's position when it is landing?  Does it use radio signals from the ground at the landing site to help it determine it's position?

Does the software in the Falcon 9 first stage use the force of gravity in computing burns?

Would the software have to be modified?

These are all interesting questions that our readers might appreciate your investigating.

There are really two questions there, because your post specifically suggests the second stage.

Question? Why would you not make Lunar Landers out of Falcon 9 2nd Stages?

(th)

Offline

Like button can go here

Questions from (th):

Can the Falcon 9 upper stage land on the Moon?

How does the Falcon 9 upper stage land on Earth?

If the Falcon 9 upper stage cannot currently land on Earth, what would it take to give it that ability?

Is it technically feasible?  I assume it must be because others than SpaceX have landed on the Moon.

At one point Elon Musk was considering making it into a "Mini-Starship".  That was abandoned in order to focus on much larger sized Starships.  The 2nd Stage of Falcon 9, I believe is of an Aluminum/Lithium Alloy which is lighter than Stainless Steel, except that the heat shield would be much heavier than for Stainless Steel.  The 2nd Stage of Falcon 9 would burn up very fast in the atmosphere without a very, very good heat shield.  Therefore the Falcon 9 2nd Stage does not land on Earth at all but is either abandoned to a higher orbit, or sent to burn up in the atmosphere.

The Falcon 9 1st stage if it does land does a "Hover Slam".  It is a very tricky maneuver where somehow, they can calculate exactly how to throttle the engine down and when to shut the engine off.  If they calculate wrong the engine cuts off too soon and the ship crashes.  If they cut the engine off too late, the ship rises up again and then crashes.  They cannot throttle the engine down enough to simply hover.

Starship and Superheavy can both hover, which is an improvement.

It would not be practical to get the Falcon 9 1st stage into LEO on it's own power.  Perhaps some sort of Starship could lift it to LEO, but I am not sure that that would have a value.

The reason I am interested in bringing the Falcon 9 2nd Stage to Lunar orbit and then filling it and then landing it is that is is otherwise a throw away item.  Although the Merlin Engines coke up after a while, I am hoping that it would have one more burn in it, if it was a used engine.  One more burn to land some robots or other instruments to a location.  Maybe supplies to a base.  It itself could be valuable at a base for its metals.

Let's suppose that we had a propellants depot in Lunar Proximity.  You might use electric rockets to deliver RP-1 and water to it from LEO.
The depot would be capable of cracking the water into Oxygen and Hydrogen, in a quantity suitable to fill one Falcon 9 2nd stage.  Then you could land it.  (I have not stipulated any use for the Hydrogen Yet).

It would seem that the 2nd stage would have an even worse problem with throttling down the engine to land on the Moon, but that might be corrected by loading it down with a sufficient amount of Cargo.  Legs would have to be added to the assembly, I propose that they be made of materials wanted on the surface of the Moon, perhaps of Carbon and Plastics as much as possible.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Another interesting use for such a 2nd Stage would be to boost a Starship back to Earth from Lunar Orbit.  Merlins are not as efficient or powerful as Raptors, but there propellant "RP-1" can be stored and transferred much better than Methane.

Water Similarly could be transferred to a Lunar Proximate Depot much easier than Oxygen.

In both the case of RP-1 and Water, the vapor pressures being low at low temperatures you would not need active cooling during transfer by electric rocket.  This is a benefit because electric propulsion is slow and if you had to have active cooling hardware on the ship it would be excess mass, and would demand some of the electric energy budget.  If you had to spend tha extra electricity, then you have to have larger solar panels or a larger nuclear reactor, which then adds even more mass.

But if you bring RP-1 and water to a Lunar Proximate space station which largely holds position then that station can have a very large power supply which you might manipulate the propellants.  In the case of Falcon 9 2nd Stage, the RP-1 just has to be warmed up a bot to be fluid enough to pump, The water can be split into LOX and Hydrogen.  Since the Station does not move much it can have a massive power supply with a lot of inertia and can then be used to prevent the boil-off of the LOX.

We might microwave the Hydrogen to provide propulsion for station keeping.

Let's consider "L1" for the Station.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange_point
Quote: 960px-Lagrange_points_simple.svg.png

Sorry, that is the Sun/Earth L1 not the Earth/Moon L1.  I will seek a more appropriate diagram.

This perhaps: https://www.thespacereview.com/article/2882/1
Image Quote: 2882a.jpg

Starship might be able to grab used Falcon 9 2nd stages from LEO, and bring them to a electric tug which would bring them and "RP-1" and water to the station at "L1".  The Station at "L1" would warm the "RP-1" for filling the Falcon 9 2nd Stages.  It would also crack the water into LOX and Hydrogen.  The Hydrogen might be used for Station keeping, being ejectred for propulsion from a VASIMR engine. 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variable_ … sma_Rocket

Some station keeping is needed at "L1" as it it a bit unstable.

Now this leaves the question, would then Falcon 9 2nd Stage have enough power to go to the Moon and actually land with a payload?  Well, I am not sure.  If not, then the Station needs to be in the orbit of the Moon, closer into it.  In which case the Hydrogen thrust will also be wanted.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

For the case of Hydro-Lox spacecraft the same method could be used but just with Water, no RP-1.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

In the case of Starship and other Metha-Lox methods, I am hoping that the station can take Hydrogen from the water and use it to cook the RP-1 into Methane.  Not entirely confident for that.

But if you did have used Falcon 9 2nd stages you might use them to boost Starship while burning RP-1 and LOX>

But of course, Merlins get Carboned up.


I think that shipping a stable hydrocarbon and water to a processing refilling station might make sense.  I already explained why that could be compatible with electric propulsion such as Magdrive or Neumann Drive.  You might also ship Carbon or Dry Ice to get the proper balance of Carbon, Oxygen, and Hydrogen atoms to create the various propellants with.

I hope that that helps (th).

Ask for more if you like.

Ending Pending smile


Ending Pending.

#22 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Multi-Ship Expeditions, Starboat & Starship, Other. » 2026-01-01 11:50:10

This is an amendment to the just prior post #213.

Question? Why would you not make Lunar Landers out of Falcon 9 2nd Stages?

IF Firefly/Magdrive can resupply a fuel depot/maker in proximity to the Moon, you may be able to refill Falcon 9 2nd stages and put legs on them an use them as landers.

I think if you put enough cargo on them then you could throttle the engines so that you don't have to do a hoverslam???

Or so what if you do a Hoverslam and it works that is just fine.

The 2nd stages are made of a Lithium/Aluminum alloy, I believe and so they are relatively light.

You could attach the cargo to the landing legs so that the device will not be topple prone.

The Merlines Carbon up with use, but you would only be using them one time to land.  You could reuse those want to LEO, or you could bring fresh ones up with Starship, and ship them to Lunar proximity with Magdrive.

Ending Pending smile

You could make the Falcon 9 system fully reusable in a way by selling Lunar landings using Falcon 9 modified 2nd stages to land in various places on the Moon for surveying purposes.  This could be supported by a Starship that stays in Lunar orbit and then may return to Earth.

Ending Pending :

#23 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Multi-Ship Expeditions, Starboat & Starship, Other. » 2026-01-01 11:05:18

So, I am continuing to be interested in the concepts that Firefly projects, and that of Magdrive and Neumann drive.  Those and of course the heavy lift capabilities in development such as SpaceX, Blue Origin, Rocket Lab Plus ULA?

The idea of depots in CIS Lunar Space, is growing.  Blue Origin has the notion of actively cooled Hydro-Lox, and some have speculated on low boil off methods for SpaceX Metha-Lox.

I am wondering about stored Jet fuel and water.  We already think about generating Oxygen and Methane on Mars from CO2 and Water.

Could you do it in Lunar Orbit, using Jet Fuel and Water?  I said Jet fuel, but really, I indicate fuel for Merlin Engines.  That fuel and water are low risk for boil off.  They are the Low Maintenance companions, I think.  Using Magdrive or Neumann Drive you might slowly move depots of them to a Lunar proximity, while having low maintenance costs for the preservation of the fuel and water.

Could you split the Hydrogen off of the water to produce Oxygen and then add that Hydrogen to the "Jet Fuel", to produce Methane?
Perhaps some kind of solar hot process might do that?  I know that it might want to produce other Hydrocarbons, but I would have a look at it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_fuel
Quote:

Melting point    −47 °C (−53 °F; 226 K)
Boiling point    176 °C (349 °F; 449 K)

So, it seems that in CIS Lunar Space, it might be possible to store both the Jet Fuel and Water as gel or ice.  Neither one has a very high vapor pressure I expect.  I think that makes them low maintenance.

And that brings up some interesting possible options as to if you could push either one of them out of a spaceship in the night side of the Moon during a landing event and then recover the substances before they evaporated.  That way your landing legs do not have to be as strong.  There could easily be locations on the Moon which will have no Carbon or Hydrogen to make fuel with.  Oxygen is fairly ubiquitous on the Moon.

But my primary interest is in a orbital depot in proximity of the Moon where Jet Fuel and water can be refined into various propellants.
Propellants for a Merlin Engine.
Propellants for a Hydro-Lox Engine
Propellants for a Metha-Lox Engine.

I will note that the stored products, "Jet Fuel" and Water will make good radiation protection.   So, the Merlin engines perhaps should be respected a little more as you can perhaps use "Jet Fuel" and Water as shielding before you use them for propellants.  Yes, you can do that with Methane and Hydrogen also but then you are suffering boiloff and cryogenic burdens.

The Jet fuel might also be subjected to electrolysis, if necessary to produce various materials.

Firefly intends to transport hypergolic propellant as I seem to recall.  I think that they could transport "Jet Fuel" and Water.

Also, it may be that water from the Moon will be worth lifting up to Lunar orbit, so then all you would send to Lunar Orbit would be Jet fuel.

In case you are new to this topic this post, #212, describes Magdrive: https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 13#p236713

So, if it can all work as I hope it can this would be a very good tool kit for expanding into Space.

We also might consider if "Jet Fuel" could be transported to Phobos and Deimos, using Magdrive.  The two moons almost certainly can yield Oxygen so there would be no need to send water.  So a refilling method could be established in Mars orbit, I feel.

Ending Pending smile

#24 Re: Terraformation » The Moon » 2026-01-01 09:48:11

I am wondering if large metal shells could be made on the Moon using some sort of 3D printing methods.  Relativity Space may have a process that could perhaps show a way.

But before large metal shells, you would need large amounts of suitable metals.

Stainless Steel?  Chromium?

Well, here is something about Chromium on the Moon: https://lunarpedia.org/w/Chromium
Quote:

Geologic surveys of the moon have located vast deposits of chromite on the Sinus Aestuum, covering an area thousands of square kilometers in size[3]. It is believed that these deposits are located all across the moon, but are buried in deeper layers, and that the deposits on the Sinus Aestuum are the result of a meteorite impact blasting away the overburden.

This situation where a buried substance was exposed by an impact event also seems to be related to Orange soil that and Apollo mission found.  https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2 … 040233.htm
Quote:

Apollo 17
The Apollo mission that found orange volcanic soil is Apollo 17, which landed in the Taurus-Littrow valley on the Moon in December 1972. Astronaut Harrison Schmidt noticed the unusual orange soil near the landing site, which turned out to be rich in volcanic glass beads formed during ancient fire-fountain eruptions approximately 3.64 billion years ago. These tiny glass beads, each less than 1 mm across, provide valuable insights into the Moon's explosive volcanic history and its geological evolution.
S

So usually we do not think of "Ore Bodies" on the Moon, but it seems that there may be some.  They may tend to be covered over with mixed up boring regolith.

But magnetic Iron may be available in that boring regolith in small amounts.  Less than 1% is typical, I believe.

Now I stumbled on something Calliban might like: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8081250/
Quote:

Iron can be microbially extracted from Lunar and Martian regolith simulants and 3D printed into tough structural materials

  Image Quote: pone.0249962.g001.jpg

Otherwise, I believe that roasting regolith in Hydrogen gas at significant temperature might also be used to reduce Iron.  https://www.youtube.com/@Anthrofuturism actually thinks that such a process will gain and not lose Hydrogen as the regolith has some Hydrogen in it.

This is more complex than what I need but it is good: https://sites.wustl.edu/meteoritesite/i … unar-soil/  Quote:

Major Elements – In lunar rocks and soils 98–99% of the mass consists of 7 chemical elements

This one has a useful listing of materials in it: https://www.bing.com/search?q=Chart%20o … 8CF79273BF
Image Quote: Compounds-existing-in-lunar-regolith.png
Image Quote: Chemical-composition-of-lunar-regolith-Credit-L1-Space-Nexus-9.jpg
Image Quote: Composition-of-lunar-regolith-based-on-data-collected-in-the-highlands.png

So, it seems like if you want Iron and Oxygen the Maria maybe best.  If you want Iron, Aluminum, and Oxygen then the Highlands are better, but you get less Iron.

If I understand things correctly it is easiest to get Oxygen off of Iron.


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Now a little bet on Mars Derangement Syndrome.

It is my opinion that the Cake Eaters have programed you all for failure.  Their agenda is that technological people will serve them to make cushy nests for them on Earth, where they can use their verbal skills to usurp the destiny of the human race to serve their low purposes of being pampered.

Therefore, the Mars Roach Motel.

The game is to say that the Moon is useless, and to say "Go fetch Mars".  And then to make sure by various devices that humans to Mars is a dead end.  They will allow technological development, as long as they can divert funds to their chosen few from it, but will again and again break the back of anything that seems to be about to achieve the goal.

And they play you for fools.

The Moon and Mars is not an "OR" function, it is an "AND" function.

Any Moon effort could provide Metals for Magdrive and Neumann Drive.  It also can provide Oxygen, and maybe water for efforts to access small worlds.

Among these could be Bennu, and Ryugu, but also Phobos and Deimos.

So, you would be gaining capabilities to access Mars as well.

Do not let prancing academic princelings scam you into having them as your reward for space efforts.  We should want hard results, not Ivory Tower Dwellers as our reward.

Ending Pending smile

#25 Re: Terraformation » The Moon » 2025-12-31 07:22:07

By imposition and agreement, the focus of this topic> https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=11271
"Index» Business Proposals» Data Centers (Including Off World)"

Is kept narrower than I would like.  So, since the Moon seems such a good case for it, I will seek to develop it further here.

The view now indicates that things are already under intentions:
1) Starlink like networks.
2) Sun-Synchronous AI networks for Inference AI.
3) Moon development, with Neuralink.
4) Asteroid Mining.

This full set of objectives, achieved would give a chance at a worthwhile existence, I feel.

An Oxygen Bubble Radiator with internally nested sub-radiator systems is what interests me at this moment.

Checking the inventory of materials on the Moon 40-45% Oxygen and the rest being mostly metals and Silicon.  The total amount of Oxygen Bubble Radiators that could be created is vast.

Collecting solar power to electricity and dumping the heat from AI will require suitable heat sinks, and I think Oxygen Bubble Radiators may do well for the purpose.

From that mentioned topic I have this: https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 02#p236702
Quote:

I will add this attempt: kP0ELOT.png

Quote:

So, we might consider a "Nested String Of Pearls Radiator Method": RuUSla8.png

On the Moon I am imagining very large Oxygen Cylinders laying on their sides.
yMGgciR.png

I have previously suggested Oxygen at 1/3 bar, to be compatible with Humans and to decrease fire risk and to reduce the needed structural strength.  But I suppose higher pressures could be used.

After all Oxygen Cylinders on Earth don't seem to catch fire from pure Oxygen inside, so there must be some method to provide for that.
But if people are inside, then fire risk and breathing methods would need addressing.

I do not intend long term human habitation as radiation protection would run counter to the desire to radiate heat.

Where previously I mentioned only the shadowed craters of the Moon, I think much of the high latitudes would do, as you can put up vertical or angled walls of solar panels to capture energy and to shade the radiators.

In realty Neuralink and Virtual Reality could allow a person on the Earth to have one or more robot bodies on the Moon that it could temporarily inhabit with the persons consciousness.

So, if you had 10 billion people on Earth, you might have 20 billion Robots on the Moon, and perhaps 10 billion Robots on Earth.  People's minds may have one or more Avatars more than their human body.

There are various ideas for moving mass from the Moon.  There are matter projectors, and there are Elevator and Tether lifting concepts.

I myself am a bit interested in Magdrive and/or Neumann Drive to project matter to a receiver.  This might be done with conductive materials such as Metals, Iron, Aluminum, Copper, (Maybe other).

If by some means you can move mass from the Moon to its orbits, then Magdrive or Neumann Drive could be used for Asteroid missions to get materials from the asteroids to the Earth/Moon sub-system.


I have shown radiator fins to double as impactor protection.  Solar panels might also do some of that.

Or you might employ rows of chevron fins.

Anyway, lets imagine that eventually 50% of the Moons surface would be mostly covered in Oxygen Radiators.

While solar energy might be collected on the Moons surface, it might also be beamed down to the Moon form power plants in orbits.

And I do not prohibit the use of other power sources as they may be available.

Ending Pending smile

  1. Index
  2. » Search
  3. » Posts by Void

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB