New Mars Forums

Official discussion forum of The Mars Society and MarsNews.com

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Announcement: This forum is accepting new registrations via email. Please see Recruiting Topic for additional information. Write newmarsmember[at_symbol]gmail.com.
  1. Index
  2. » Search
  3. » Posts by Void

#1 Re: Human missions » Starship is Go... » 2025-08-30 10:28:09

I thought your post was a good one.

I am thinking of the idea that the "Horrible Grunt" to Sub-Orbital, might be followed by a diagnosis period in Sub-Orbital, where an engine running on Ullage gas would keep a low orbit until, the diagnosis indicates a healthy ship.  So, if you have something like an engine skirt explosion, whatever that was, you do not produce long term space junk, in the orbits you want to use.

If you had a small engine, perhaps running on Ullage Gas, then you could proceed to orbit.

I consider it something to think about not a showstopper.  We know that the enemies of SpaceX progress will eventually seize on this to try to get into the way, so I am suggesting getting in front of it ahead of time.  Obviously over time the quality of the ships should increase, but the frequency of flights desired, may suggest that now and then there will be a clinker.

Ending Pending smile

#2 Re: Life support systems » Effects of Oxygen and other gas levels on Photosynthesis, habitats. » 2025-08-30 09:58:04

Biosphere 2 may be suitable for a study.  Perhaps it already has some data.
https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … ORM=VAMGZC
Quote:

Inside Biosphere 2: The World's Largest Earth Science Experiment
YouTube
The Good Stuff
2.4M views


Does not sound too encouraging, but maybe there is data to help confirm or refute what I said in post #1.

Ending Pending smile

#3 Life support systems » Effects of Oxygen and other gas levels on Photosynthesis, habitats. » 2025-08-30 09:04:23

Void
Replies: 1

My search engine will not find this: "Woke up History, What 35% Oxygen Did to Life on Earth | HISOTORY FOR SLEEP"

This phrase seems to work better: "Utube, HISTORY FOR SLEEP,  What 35% Oxygen Did to Life on Earth"

There seem to be similar videos, I cannot fetch the one I am listening to.

But in the video, a brief comment pushed me, it seemed to say that during the "Carboniferous" high Oxygen enhanced photosynthesis.

When I tried to confirm this my AI guide strongly disagreed.  It said for higher, plants lower Oxygen levels enhance photosynthesis.

I may have misunderstood, or perhaps multiple types of photosynthesis react differently to Oxygen level.

So, this may suggest that in making places to grow plants under light either, from the sun or artificial, a lower Oxygen level may be of a benefit.

Forgive me please if I am mistaken.  In C3 photosynthesis I read that Oxygen is a problem where it damages the process of Photosynthesis.  The plants can only partially counteract its interference with productive photosynthesis.  So, if may be that lower Oxygen levels make it easier for the plants.

The Oxygen levels of Earth are going down a tiny level due to burning  The Earth is greening, but that is most likely due to elevated CO2 levels.

But if we build habitats in space where we expect to grow green plants, we may not want the equivalent Oxygen level of our 21% atmosphere on Earth.  Lower Oxygen levels may promote plant productivity, it seems.

Lower Oxygen levels may also reduce fire risk.

But lower Oxygen levels may be problems for things like pollinating insects.  But lower gravity may reduce the energy they have to expend to fly.  I guess hummingbirds might be a substitute for insect pollinators.  Probably insects from Alpine flowery places would be a good place to look for suitable pollinators.

It would be nice to also satisfy human needs however: https://www.sciencing.com/minimum-oxyge … ing-15546/  Quote:

Minimum Oxygen Concentration For Human Breathing
By  Mallory Malesky Updated Mar 24, 2022

Read More: https://www.sciencing.com/minimum-oxyge … ing-15546/

My current notion is that humans may have Oxygen masks of some kind, perhaps that can enhance Oxygen levels in a low Oxygen mix.  Quote:

Humans need oxygen to live, but not as much as you might think. The minimum oxygen concentration in the air required for human breathing is 19.5 percent. The human body takes the oxygen breathed in from the lungs and transports it to the other parts of the body via the body's red blood cells. Each cell uses and requires oxygen to thrive. Most of the time, the air in the atmosphere contains the proper amount of oxygen for safe breathing. But at times, the level of oxygen can drop due to other toxic gases reacting with it.

Read More: https://www.sciencing.com/minimum-oxyge … ing-15546/

Oxygen Concentrator, (Removes Nitrogen to make a higher Oxygen level).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxygen_concentrator
Quote:

Oxygen concentrator

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
An oxygen concentrator is a device that concentrates the oxygen from a gas supply (typically ambient air) by selectively removing nitrogen to supply an oxygen-enriched product gas stream. They are used industrially, to provide supplemental oxygen at high altitudes, and as medical devices for oxygen therapy.[1]

Not all greenhouses would have to have low Oxygen levels, but perhaps to enhance productivity and avoid fires, low Oxygen levels might be used.  Perhaps just a bit lower.

This may suggest the levels tolerable without a Oxygen Mask: Quote:

Not Enough Oxygen: Side Effects
Not Enough Oxygen: Side Effects
Serious side effects can occur if the oxygen levels drop outside the safe zone. When oxygen concentrations drop from 19.5 to 16 percent, and you engage in physical activity, your cells fail to receive the oxygen needed to function correctly. Mental functions become impaired and respiration intermittent at oxygen concentrations that drop from 10 to 14 percent; at these levels with any amount of physical activity, the body becomes exhausted. Humans won't survive with levels at 6 percent or lower.

Read More: https://www.sciencing.com/minimum-oxyge … ing-15546/

I think this may open interesting methods to increase productivity while keeping risk to humans relatively low.

Ending Pending smile

#4 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Multi-Ship Expeditions, Starboat & Starship, Other. » 2025-08-29 13:33:28

If a heat shield scheme similar to the one in the prior post might have value, consider the moons of Mars, Phobos and Deimos.  Quote:

But I think I may see a way to do something that is a bit new.

dMreFqW.png

They can supply Oxygen which is going to be a maybe for a coolant.  But if they do have Carbon, then they could supply CO2 as a Dilutant.

The NOVA is expected to burn Hydrogen and Oxygen, but if you could add extra Oxygen or perhaps better yet, CO2, as a dilutant then the output might not be unreasonably corrosive.

Perhaps it could work.  I you could make the under-shields out of the materials of Phobos and Deimos, then even better as you could make those shields as large as you want to.

My suggestion is to transport the bulk of cargo to Mars orbit by electric propulsion and the get it down to the surface by a means like this, if it can prove to work.

The deorbit is a considerably lower speed than to come in from I.P. Space.

Granted, I see this as the continuation, not the start.

The stars need to be cargo Starships that can survive the whole trip direct, more or less.

Ending Pending smile

*Methane also could be a fuel or a dilutant.

Ending Pending smile

#5 Re: Not So Free Chat » Peter Zeihan again: and also other thinkers: » 2025-08-29 09:28:24

I have watched only the one video listed from this site: https://www.youtube.com/@MDVL_mindset

So, don't assume that other videos are equal to my ideas of whatever.

But this one I watched: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeePF0w … valMindset
Quote:

Why Europe Was BETTER After Rome Fell

Medieval Mindset
21.3K subscribers

I recall I was told in public school that indeed Europeans were so unworthy and only the Arabs were brilliant.

I have been a creature that haunted libraries, and then of course later, haunted the internet.

Things I already knew that are in this video, are:
-The "Irish", or their similar, sailed in skin boats deep in to the north sea.
-The Vikings later did Viking stuff to those monks in Iceland.
-Columbus spent time in Iceland before his famous voyages.

https://www.icelandicroots.com/post/201 … in-iceland
Quote:

Did you know Christopher Columbus stayed in Iceland for an entire winter? In 1477, he sailed to Iceland and stayed at the farm called Ingjaldshóll (Ingjaldshvóll).

There are various reasons why the Viking wave did not go too far into North America.  I recall a story that the natives "Skraeling's" had some sort of spear throwers, which gave them a technologically superior position.  However, when the
Europeans returned in about 500 years those people were not to be found, nor their weapons.  The Vikings were never that many people in Iceland and Greenland, and even Greenland had an acceptable climate at about 1000 AD.  Then of course the Mini Ice age helped wipe out the Greenlanders and almost finished the Icelanders.

I was also aware that Vikings were guards in Byzantium, and that Vikings went down to Bagdad to get silver.

An item of importance in the video that I did not know was that at some point, the plough was improved along with horse harnesses, allowing agriculture to expand in the North.

My own theory is that that Alpha Bed Hoppers are the downfall of civilizations.  That is, when the Chads and the Tyrones are allowed to play Coocoo bird with other men's women, then the skills disappear and so then also the wealth.

In the north, that could not happen as you had to have better skills to be powerful than to impregnate a peasants woman.  But if farming was enhanced, then there could be peasants for the Chads and Tyrones to impregnate.  So, a bloom of wealth, may be destined to be ended in poverty.

The resurgence of fossil fuels in the USA at least has balanced out the mischief money that was accumulated in the M.E.

The effort to de-industrialize the west, which was very likely promoted in the shadows by the Chads and Tyrones of Fascism, Communism, Socialism, and the M.E. oil money , is being resisted thankfully.

I was interrupted by a visitor during this post and have sort of lost the thread of thought, so I will end it here.

Ending Pending smile

#6 Re: Business Proposals » Maximum Use of Conductors, Distributed Electric Storage, Aspin Farms. » 2025-08-28 20:43:00

Exawatt: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPLxmpc … orgeEmpire
Quote:

Exawatt's Modular Power System: Cheap, Reliable, and Ready for the Future

The Forge Empire
197K subscribers

I think they limit themselves.  Actually, they could also suck in energy from the grid, especially if it is excess wind power,
or off-peak power.

Add Pyrolysis of organic matter, and also the ability to burn charcoal when necessary and yet being at least Carbon Neutral or better.

Ending Pending smile

#7 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Multi-Ship Expeditions, Starboat & Starship, Other. » 2025-08-28 18:51:08

I am thinking about accessories for the Starship such as a carry-in-cargo 3rd Stage.

Technically Star links will already be that as they have their own propulsion systems. 

Diameter of Starship 9 meters / 30 feet.  A new version may be significantly larger.

About NOVA again from Stoke Space: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stoke_Space_Nova
Quote:

Diameter    4.2 m (14 ft)

I will grant that it is a small ship.

https://www.space.com/stoke-space-hoppe … ght-photos
Quote:

A credible member here has opinioned that it could not do a return from the Moon with its existing heat shield.  I have no reason to suppose that that opinion is wrong.

But I think I may see a way to do something that is a bit new.

dMreFqW.png

In the case where the NOVA went to the Moon and the shield traveled with it, it might be left in Lunar orbit while the NOVA would land on the Moon.  Then be reattached for the trip back to Earth.

I have not provided propulsive means to transfer the NOVA to and from the Moon.  That would be extra.

Ending Pending smile


An atmospheric entry mode is suggested in the drawing.  Returning from the Moon, the Shield is added to the ship as shown.

The "Footprint" is larger than that of the NOVA, which may help.  The NOVA will ride in the wake of the forward heat shield.

The thrusters for the NOVA might be assistive in cooling.  One possibility I have in mind would be a high Oxygen Mix, which of course would be like a cutting torch, possibly.  But if the shield is of a material that resists Oxidation on it's inner surface, it might work.  The pressure and heat of the exhaust might be milder than that of a cutting torch.  The heat quenched by a lot of Oxygen perhaps.  Of course I am thinking of Lunar Oxygen as a coolant.

But dilutant gasses such as Argon, Nitrogen, CO2 could be added to the mix.  So, you would do a little combustion and then add a lot more Oxygen, Argon, Nitrogen, or CO2.

The shield will have to detach in the atmosphere after the heating is over.  It may have been manufactured on the Moon or lifted to orbit in a Starship.

It might be one time use, or just perhaps might be outfitted with a parachute to land like a Falcon 9 Fairing.

#8 Re: Not So Free Chat » Peter Zeihan again: and also other thinkers: » 2025-08-28 18:49:10

Thanks for your comments Calliban.  Just because I watch something does not mean that I entirely agree, or dissagree with it.

I think that feel that the Global Banking System is the inheritor of the British Empire.

Promethean seems to be anti solar and anti wind.  I am not so much that except in a case where it may cause a problem.

They feel comfortable with burning lots of coal as they feel that China is going to win the AI competition by having more electric power by burning coal.  They minimize the concern for CO2.  I remain neutral, as long as I feel we will be able to remove CO2 from the atmosphere if it turns out it has to be done.

I looking at this organizations presentations and that of others such as P. Zeihan or George Friedman, just because I look does not indicate that I accept strongly every things they say.

Thanks,

Ending Pending smile

#9 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Multi-Ship Expeditions, Starboat & Starship, Other. » 2025-08-28 10:11:43

For instance, if Starship will expand its diameter, and yet also keep the current diameter starships, then the larger Diameter Starship may be able to bring back an entire engine section of the smaller diameter Starship.

This would be a little like the logic for ULA's Vulcan where the tanks of the 1st stage would be disposed of after use, and then engine section and avionics would be brought back for reuse by some heat shield and landing method.

But in this case the Ships would be rendered into propellants, except for special parts like the Engine bay with engines.

Of course, that requires modified Starships.

Ending Pending smile

#10 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Multi-Ship Expeditions, Starboat & Starship, Other. » 2025-08-28 09:44:09

The question is not if we want a replacement for the Space Shuttle, where a flyback service is desirable and useful, but what in reality will be it's true cost.

I like the SpaceX effort to bring back Starships, and I expect that they will simply get better and better at it over time, but at this time, we don't really know how many repeats are possible, in reality at a reasonable price.  It is necessary, particularly for return of materials and perhaps for orbital refilling, however we don't yet know the true long term relative cost.

So, to me it makes sense to have a parallel project of repurpose of Starship structure in LEO and beyond.

As I have said such craft in rafts, may provide space junk collision protection and some radiation protection, and to protect from thermal fluctuations.  But if MagDrive and/or Neumann Drive work out at large scale, then after a term of service in that mode, they could be rendered into propellant pellets or rods, that could be stored in bags inside of a Starship as both radiation protection and propellant mass.

If it is economic to bring the raptors and other valuable parts back down to Earth by some means than that may make the method more desirable.

Ending Pending smile

#11 Re: Home improvements » Misc. Home Projects » 2025-08-28 09:41:47

I don't want to contaminate your purity of essence, but if wind is you motor on occasion, could it be possible to have a parallel source of motor from an electric grid?  Off peak power perhaps?

So with the wind you have to work when the wind blows, but with off peak power, you have your choices do, or don't' do.

I am not talking about your Hobbie project which is wonderful, rather, supposing Humanoid Robots become actually useful, then one could do some work around the homestead, but at times work with the wind or with off peak power, if that is available at a reasonable price.  This of course would be a different installation.

A robot could work at night, where most humans would not.  Wind may blow at night.

Ending Pending smile

#12 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Multi-Ship Expeditions, Starboat & Starship, Other. » 2025-08-27 18:57:08

Referring to the previous post, I have a scheme for a "Spin Cast" payload launch system.

ZQUeScZ.png

The payload is like a lure on a fishing rod.  Starting at the center of spin. 

The "Casting Rod", released from clamps might get a push from an electromagnetic launch device.

The "Casting Rod" with Payload will rotate on the "Swivel", and the "Fishing Line" is allowed out.

The "Payload" takes more and more of the inertia of the launcher, until it is extended full and some release mechanism, detaches the payload.  (We hope it travels then in the manner desired".

The "Fishing Line" is reeled in as in a fishing rod, and then you need some mechanism to bet the rod back to the original position.  As much of the spin has been taken by the payload, this may not be as hard to do as may be supposed.

I have not shown a mechanism to bring the "Casting Rod" back to a clamped position to take another payload.

Starships which are intended to be repurposed would be about 100 Tons of potential to store inertia.  So, if you have strong cabling you could make a massive "Spinning Raft" to store energy.

One method of spin-up could be from electric rocket engines.  But there can be other schemes.

The outflow of fishing line might be regulated by some method of "Drag" similar to a fishing rig.

Ending Pending smile

#13 Re: Human missions » Starship is Go... » 2025-08-27 18:38:33

I request tolerance that I can say a few things.

-I think that if Starship is going to shed materials, perhaps they should do the shedding in a suborbital mode and then go to orbit.  Hopefully leaving the shed materials behind.

-I think it might be wise to try to land a Starship on the old peg legs.  That way if they are successful, they might fully examine the ship.  This then allows them to make improvements before they risk a tower catch mishap.  It might be that if they can make a good enough landing pad on Mars some Cargo Ships could land on the peg legs, maybe improved peg legs.

At this stage in Starship development, they are probably making each Starship obsolete after one flight anyway.

And yes I would like to see them catch a newer Superheavy if it seems likely to be successful.

Ending Pending smile

#14 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Multi-Ship Expeditions, Starboat & Starship, Other. » 2025-08-27 11:47:00

I want make a note that offtherock has some interesting ideas here: https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?
pid=233875#p233875

I know what Elon Musk's favorite dream is and what NASA's is:  Mars, Moon.

But now consider Rafts of Starships and what could be done with them.

If you run "Disposable/Not Really Starships, in the current situation you can supposedly have a LEO cargo of 250 Tons.

Each launch might lift many Star links and some Argon, and maybe some refurbishment materials to make parts of a Starship more useful.

We could consider a static raft of Starships.  I will make a drawing: xTQA2qO.png

The Brown lines are solar panels, which may receive light from mirrors which can be very thin.

The ships may protect each other from some radiation.  For GCR, Ship #3 might be the best protected.  For Solar Radiation perhaps #4 or #5 might be better.

The solar panels may be a little protected from impactors, and also harsh radiation as the mirrors will not reflect hard radiation.

And I don't think we are limited to just 5 ships.

Not all part of all ships have to be pressurized, so for pressure protection #3 might be the best as impactors may likely hit something else on their way to #3.

The drawing is certainly not perfect and could be improved.

I am expecting that Argon Electric propulsion would be used from LEO.  And It may be that parts of the ships could be used in Magdrive or Neumann Drive electric propulsions as propellants.

A primary downside is that the mirrors may provide larger atmospheric drag.  But with electric propulsions then you may compensate.  In fact you might be able to cannibalize whole ships which would provide additional radiation protection until they were converted to propellants.


If you wanted a spinning raft then you could accumulate centrifugal force, and use a slide-tether to launch things with that spin force.

The payload would start at the raft and would slide down the tether gaining momentum as it went.

But I have not created a drawing for that.

So, my point is, a whole lot is almost available to us with just the reuse of the Superheavy, and the repurpose of the Starship to make rafts.

Ending Pending smile

#15 Re: Not So Free Chat » Peter Zeihan again: and also other thinkers: » 2025-08-27 11:15:46

It is needed for the reader to understand that I had a Scottish Canadian Grandparent, and a Yankee American Grandmother who was largely English with a bit of Scottish and French Huguenot.   I also had two Swedish Grandparents.

It is not my practice to hate the British, as they are in my ancestry and have not personally harmed me as I recall.

But I like this video, and hope that the British can also get a better situation for themselves.

https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … &FORM=VIRE  Quote:

Trump FIRES Fed Governor | London PANICS as Third American Revolution Begins - August 27, 2025
YouTube
Promethean Updates

I think we have had 4 American revolutions though.  WWII was the third, I feel, but we got entangled in the worlds degeneracy in that as well.

I see the democratic party as simply the Confederacy again, and their very valued urban hell holes are the plantations reimagined again.  Remember that not all slave owners were WASPS, in fact most WASPS were not slave owners.

A very great number of slave owners were in Africa itself and were themselves Africans of some sort.  They captured and sold both Africans and Europeans into slavery.

Ending Pending smile

#16 Re: Business Proposals » Maximum Use of Conductors, Distributed Electric Storage, Aspin Farms. » 2025-08-27 10:00:56

Yes it is encouraging.

If we can have electricity>Data Center>Heat>Slush Pond>Heat>Pyrolysis Oven>Pyrolysis Products,  Then I think we may have something of worth.

We could then make Hydrogen, Methane for Precision Fermentation, Tar? For what?, Carbon in the form of Biochar, to either inter into soil and bogs, or to burn for electricity and heat.

The Oven and Slush pond could also be used in heating and cooling dwellings, and to some extent perhaps for Industrial Heat.

For the slush pond:

Some info on RH% in the USA:

https://www.currentresults.com/Weather/ … -state.php

https://www.reddit.com/r/MapPorn/commen … _relative/
Image Quote: 7GYUeI98_ln_qIVF-yE7orFJNnEtuz3YTmGkbxEzCJ8.jpg?width=1080&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=4aa4e4c45bd324b411505423e4557ce954d148ff

Obviously summer months with high RH% would be the best times to condense water from the air into the slush pond.
Also this is probably when the best solar energy will be available to run the heat pumps.

As I recall a 20 degree Fahrenheit drop in temperature will double the RH% of the air.

So, if the slush temperature is about 32 degrees F / 0 degrees C, and the outside temperature is 52 degrees F with 50% RH% it is then at the edge of condensation potential.  The air will develop 100% RH%.  So, if temperature is higher and/or RH% outside higher condensation is a potential.

But of course you would have to choose between condensation or cooling a data center.

So, in the South in the warm months perhaps a lot of capability to do both at the same time.

It would not be a complete showstopper if the heat pumps cannot actually do what I am thinking they say they can do, but this looks rather good to me.

Ending Pending smile

#17 Re: Business Proposals » Maximum Use of Conductors, Distributed Electric Storage, Aspin Farms. » 2025-08-27 09:32:21

I have hopes that the heat pump in this post from elsewhere can create pyrolysis temperatures, and that I have not misunderstood what is actual about it: https://newmars.com/forums/search.php?s … 1667206299

Pause..............

If we can have a heat pump that cools a tank of slushy water and also a brick pyrolysis oven, then the cold side can both condense water out of the air, and the hot side can do pyrolysis on organic matter.

Data Centers might use the slushy water for cooling.

Then you use solar power with battery capacity that you desire.  You might also tap into a grid which may include wind power.  So, you would run the heat pump continuously or intermittently on the basis of energy availability.

This again: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torrefaction
Quote:

Torrefaction of biomass, e.g., wood or grain, is a mild form of pyrolysis at temperatures typically between 200 and 320 °C. Torrefaction changes biomass properties to provide a better fuel quality for combustion and gasification applications.

The heat pump claims to go to 400 degrees C: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uawATQk … ModoEnergy

I am watching it again to try to understand if I have misunderstood what they claim.

Pause..................

So, anyway, if you have a slushy pond covered with solar panels, then you might cool a data center with slushy cold water.  If you have humid air outside, you may use fans to blow that air though this to hope to condense water from the air and accumulate water.

The hot side, I hope can heat a brick oven hot enough for Torrefaction.  I feel scared that they do not actually have the ability to reach the necessary temperature.

https://www.synchrostor.co.uk/
OK, this is their verbage:

Decarbonising Heat
Higher performance and operating range (-100°C to +400°C); modularity & flexibility; hot and cold provision in compact package.

#18 Re: Business Proposals » Maximum Use of Conductors, Distributed Electric Storage, Aspin Farms. » 2025-08-27 08:43:09

I have taken a look.  A question like "Where can Aluminum replace Copper?".  It seems that it can do so in many things.

General Response: https://www.bing.com/search?q=Where+can … pc=EDGEXST

Similarly: "Motors that do not need copper?"

General Response: https://www.bing.com/search?q=Motors+th … pc=EDGEXST

And: "Substitutes for Copper in electric systems?"

General Response: https://www.bing.com/search?q=Substitut … pc=EDGEXST

This is also interesting: https://jasondeegan.com/the-u-s-discove … ificantly/  Quote:

A groundbreaking discovery by researchers at Stanford University has the potential to revolutionize the electronics industry. A material called niobium phosphide has been shown to outperform copper in conducting electricity at the nanoscale, offering a path toward more efficient and compact devices. This innovation could drastically reduce energy consumption in future technologies while addressing limitations posed by current materials.

And: "Carbon Windings in Motors?"

General Response: https://www.bing.com/search?q=Carbon+Wi … pc=EDGEXST

So, our atmosphere is full of Carbon, and the Moon is full of Aluminum.

Also new invention usually is mothered in our culture.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Another possible use for "Superpower" is in manufacturing and transporting water.

A future without problems? I would not promise that, but it looks like Copper is not going to make things impossible.

Ending Pending smile

And interesting invention: https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news/ho … i-AA1LdTVi  Quote:

How Elon Musk’s Latest Engine is Ending the EV War and Reshaping the Future of Electric Cars
The electric vehicle (EV) industry has been in a fierce battle for years, with automakers

Ending Pending smile

#19 Re: Business Proposals » Maximum Use of Conductors, Distributed Electric Storage, Aspin Farms. » 2025-08-26 10:54:58

Here is the set of solar maps that might suggest migration potential in the USA: https://www.nrel.gov/gis/solar-resource-maps  Image Quote: solar-annual-dni-2018-01.jpg?sfvrsn=73d2ae64_1

The lower set of montly charts are interesting.

Ending Pending smile

#20 Re: Business Proposals » Maximum Use of Conductors, Distributed Electric Storage, Aspin Farms. » 2025-08-26 09:36:27

So, the idea of sun following economic cycles may not be a wrong path.  "Superpower", or "Surplus Power", may be a gift that we will want to utilize.

Alright EV's and Robots, might migrate North and South with the sun.  Perhaps very large Semi Trucks with factory process inside of them.

Presumably they would be making things using electric power.

So, in a rational North America, they might be in Canada and Alaska in Mid Summer.  In the Mexican Deserts in Mid Winter.  Leaving Canada and Mexico out of it, the USA could do a lesser process.

Mid Summer in the North, Mid Winter in the South.  So, they would be soaking up excess energy from the local grids, to make useful product.

In some places in the south excess energy might be devoted to making clean water.  Recycled water, and maybe desalinization.  The new method of desalinization on the Ocean Floors, seems like it may be less disruptive of ecology.

And surplus electric energy in the south may allow pumping water to places like reservoirs, and to refill aquifers.

As far as humans go, then some migration of humans along with the machines might make sense as they also consume water and energy and may want the product that the machines would create.  So, perhaps some parts of housing could be mobile as well.

For America this may require some calculation of what the population is for use in the House of Representatives, and the Electoral Colledge.

Ending Pending smile

This would avoid moving electrical surges across the continent, and also to some extent moving water to satisfy humans.  Instead, you would move some of the humans and let them enjoy the best weather situations.  If you are not exposed to extreme weather, then you do not need as big a dwelling space as you may be outdoors more.

Ending Pending smile

#21 Re: Terraformation » Using a planet killer (Comet) to terraform Mars » 2025-08-26 09:07:26

I think my point was that this objects if it were alien would be a stupid thing for a sneaky alien civilization to do in a Dark Forest galaxy.

Sneaky would be to arrange for brilliant minds to discover things that were to lead to AI and Robots.  That might imply that they have a few agents among us already.  Perhaps software agents that they somehow infected our system with.

If they had to risk some sort of spaceflight where their ships might be observed the might arrange to meddle with humans on occasion to create red herrings.  For instance, practicing proctology on humans so that the humans would report silly stories.  That would help to discredit actual situations where they accidentally revealed themselves.

A slow boiled frog situation would have them direct the direction of our culture to suit their desires.  Slowly robots and AI would be more and more important on Earth and perhaps the solar system. 

Over time the existence of cultures similar to the one they caused us to develop might be revealed.  But in reality, that could be just a story we were told, they might give us a cleaned-up view of what they really were.  They might be partially robotic and partly organic and might consist of many types of organic on various worlds.  The entities that we supposedly see, may be of our DNA, because they collected it in the past and created organic robots that they could use in interacting with Earth.

In a Dark Forest this might be how they make sure that we will not be taken over by their predatory competitors.

Also with the notion of a "Random Walk", it may be that they will get some type of discovery by interacting with us.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Isaac Arthur has speculated that Civilizations will not want to send out colonies to other stars as those colonies might mutate into a hostile alien competitor.

A twist on that could be the Polynesian one.  They plant baby civilizations on various worlds, perhaps even using local "DNA" if that is the nature of the organism.   In order to keep the threat in control of these transplants they check up on them periodically and Wack them if they see more progress than they want.

This would be like a dead man switch.  If their core culture was still capable of monitoring us, then they would knock us flat periodically.  If they have fallen and cannot Wack us then one or more of their "Children" rise to power as a new civilization.

An evidence that we had progressed more than expected would be signs of activity on Mars, Venus, and the Moons of Jupiter.  That might indicate that they would not only have to Wack Earth but wipe out whatever we had place on Mars or around Venus or on the Moons of Jupiter.

I suppose that the good news is that they would probably limit the amount of destruction they inflicted on Earth.  And they might have to send agents of some kind to help make sure we fell into dark ages.

It is hard to say if any alien would think this is a good idea.  How would we know?  I guess the best we could do is think outside of what normal humans might think.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I do not expect that the object is hollow, but I suppose there is a small chance.  If it is, then they are not going to be Suttle, but will decide how much to Wack us, and have the confidence that they can make us superstitious of things in the sky, and degrade our "Civilization" in a desirable measure.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

But if it is a giant rock, then the aliens most likely are not behind it.  It would be overkill.

And that would mean that there may be much more baryonic matter between the stars than we have thought.

That would make going between stars harder as small impactors may be everywhere.  But it would also perhaps allow us to island hop on rogue worlds that we are not yet able to detect.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

So, it is exciting.  If it is aliens and they want to set us back, I don't think it is likely that we could resist the process very well.

Ending Pending smile

#22 Re: Not So Free Chat » Peter Zeihan again: and also other thinkers: » 2025-08-25 18:48:19

I don't know where else to put this.  Imagine if we ever meet Dinasaur Aliens:  https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … &FORM=VIRE  Quote:

Vinny the Galah Cockatoo is TALKING for 10 minutes straight!
YouTube
MARLENE MC'COHEN
40 views

I think it is actually true.

That little brain does a lot.  Imagine if a Dinasaur Alien had a brain our size?

I guess we inherited because of that Asteroid.

Ending Pending smile

#23 Re: Business Proposals » Maximum Use of Conductors, Distributed Electric Storage, Aspin Farms. » 2025-08-25 17:47:48

This is a long video and you may have seen it before: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHdUMDV … ithHerbert
Quote:

EXCLUSIVE: Tony Seba "AI Robots Will Change Our WORLD"

Brighter with Herbert
138K subscribers

In previous posts here, I have begun to involve "Torrefaction" with electric sources of energy to convert organic materials to Biochar and also Hydrogen, Methane, and Tar.

I would like to appeal to what I consider rational thinking.  At least from my point of view.

Now is it silly to let Northern Forests burn down because they were not managed or not?  I pollute air above the North American Continent.

Many of these are Canadian, and much of land that may go feral if Tony Seba is correct.  So, eventually we in America will have problems with forest fires where farm land used to be.  Unless the land is groomed.

Take a look at it do you want forests to burn down putting particle pollution into the air and also putting CO2 into the Air?  Does that make sense?  Canada says it wants to go green, but they let their forests burn, and put lots of CO2 into the Atmosphere.  And the USA will be in a similar situation if indeed, we allow a lot of farmlands to go feral.

The products of "Torrefaction" will yield Hydrogen and Methane which can be used in Precision Fermentation and also likely in Cellular Farming.  So, this will be a form of farming that will not so much depend on growing seasons.

The concept of Pleistocene Park hope to hold back the excessive thawing of permafrost in the north.  This may apply to our state of Alaska also.  https://pleistocenepark.ru/

The use of some animals and robots may allow a certain percentage of the Taiga: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiga
Could be converted back to Mammoth Steppe, to provide fire brakes and to reduce the thawing of permafrost.  The weeds and brush could be processed by Torrefaction to produce wealth and to reduce the release of CO2 into the atmosphere.  This would also be firebrakes.

America could have migrating robots to do this, possibly Canada would do it as well.

While Bison may be destructive to Solar Panels, and equipment I am tempted to consider processing Buffalo Chips.  Possibly a risk of stinky, but with good technology that perhaps could be avoided.

Lets say people in the North might burn 1/2 of the Charcoal produced in the less sunny months and put the other 1/2 into bogs and in the soils.

Robots would migrate north and south following the seasons.

The problem between the USA and Canada just now is from my point of view, a north culture that does not respect the individual.  Also, the USA culture has been "Sinning" against the American spirit for some time, but I think we are in reform under the "Orange Man".

So the compatibility of Canada and the USA is in question as I do not trust the efforts by global elites to replace Americans and to try to make us into surfs.  I think Canada is held more strongly in bondage by them than the USA is.

My current notions.  Everyone has notions.

Ending Pending smile

#24 Re: Business Proposals » Maximum Use of Conductors, Distributed Electric Storage, Aspin Farms. » 2025-08-25 10:11:16

Now, it becomes obvious that if you fall short of solar energy in a winter at high latitudes you could both burn charcoal in the brick oven and conduct "Torrefaction" (See previous post).

The gasses produced, Hydrogen and Methane could in another version support Precision Fermentation.

If you sequester 1/2 of the charcoal you create and burn 1/2 in the winter season, you have reduced the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, and yet have a burnable energy source for when necessary.

I suppose one could hope for some sort of fuel cell that could process Charcoal efficiently.

Ending Pending smile

#25 Re: Terraformation » Plutoids and Rogue Planets, Titanformation process, a cold treasure? » 2025-08-25 09:56:20

Continuing on similar lines to the previous post:
https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … &FORM=VIRE
Quote:

A JuMBO Mystery - This Shouldn't Happen!
YouTube
Cool Worlds
328.5K views
Jul 11, 2024

I think this can be solved by combining both sources of rogue planets.  Ejection and Collapse.

Ejected objects in a stellar nursery or thick dust cloud could have a secondary condensation.  They might also condense moons around them from something resembling a Oort Cloud or Kuiper belt.

Probably easier for ejections in a star nursery, to have a secondary accretion within that nursery, but I would not rule out a rouge planet drifting into a thick cloud and then having an additional accretion event.

This then might create something I want very much.  A Super Earth with its own moons, as a rogue too cool to see with our current technology.

If we could find these, and particularly if nearby, then good things could be done, in my opinion.
Quote from post #88:

But of course odds are rather low for that.  But a Super Earth or Earth sized with a significant moon would be useful.

We could establish robots on each of these, perhaps even the Super Earth, if there is one.  Geothermal from a Super Earth could be beamed up to a Moon where humans might better dwell.

Even if rockets could not escape the Super Earth robots assigned to work on the Super Earth would not be stranded there, as their minds could be beamed back and forth.  And Humans as well, could have robot bodies on that Super Earth.

So, as a rogue planet scheme that as well could be a useful pattern.

So, the Super Earth could have a rocky surface, or an icy surface or a liquid water surface.  It would have significant Geo heat.  It might have winds.  The atmosphere might be crushing, but even so with any type of surface, it might be possible to establish energy harvesting, and the energy could be beamed to a moon, which hopefully would exist.

Robots on the Super Earth even if physically stranded could beam their minds up and down from the moon or moons.
Humans might likely only live on the moons or in orbit, but they also could have telepresence on the surface of the Super Earth.  Ideally one or more moon would not have completely differentiated so that rocky materials would be available.

If it turns out that fusion becomes an economic form of energy, then the vast atmosphere of the Super Earth could supply fusion fuels, and again energy to be beamed up to the moons.  (I hope a thick atmosphere would not block that).

Ending Pending smile

  1. Index
  2. » Search
  3. » Posts by Void

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB