You are not logged in.
Orbital Water Platforms:
Expanding a bit on previous posting, It seems to me that water as a cargo to orbit could be rather ideal to a large extent.
A Starship lifting water, is less explosive than a Starship lifting extra Methane and Oxygen. So, there may be a degree of increased safety at a Earth Launch pad.
Water being liquid at temperatures often compatible with humans also has utility as it can shield from radiation and you also can use it to grow food. Growing food in it gives some complications to then make propellants but it could be done.
In cracking the water to make propellants you would perhaps get an Oxygen imbalance that you could use. Let's say you would split the water to Hydrogen and Oxygen continually. You might use some of the Hydrogen for station keeping or even to move the platform a little bit.
I am presuming that a high temperature thruster could be used to expel a trickling stream of Hydrogen for that purpose. So then you would accumulate LOX into tanks.
So, ignoring other means of transport for the moment and concentrating on Starship, you also be able to bring Carbon in a form usable but of a form that will not cause dust explosions if launch goes badly. Then if you do not want to dump all the Hydrogen produced you may make Liquid Methane from some of it.
So, water and Carbon Feedstock would be relatively benign in nature. And both may be useful for radiation shielding.
But such a platform may service a Stoke Space 2nd stage also, if you elect to make and store Liquid Hydrogen.
Some locations for such platformer might be LEO+, GEO, L1, and Lunar orbits.
Keep in mind that I am thinking that for many of these Magdrive and/or Neumann Drive would be used in transporting bulk cargos like water and Carbon. Neither Water or Carbon will require active cooling, I expect, so that makes the task easier.
https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … &FORM=VIRE
Quote:
Stoke Space Second Stage: High Performance and Reusable within 24 Hours of Landing
YouTube
Space Startup News
5.4K views
"Andromeda"
https://www.stokespace.com/introducing-andromeda/
Quote:
Introducing Andromeda, our rapidly reusable high-performance upper-stage rocket engine
Updated design upgrades performance, simplicity, and rapid reusability.
I have wondered if a "Supersized" Andromeda, might be lifted by SpaceX Superheavy.
But perhaps it is better to keep it small as then the batch of Liquid Hydrogen you have to maintain ot refill an Andromeda, would be of a smaller and more manageable size.
I think that there might be some advantages in refilling a ship in the vacuum of space outside the Earths atmosphere. Perhaps less risk of explosions from Hydrogen spills/leaks.
So, there would be a distinction between ships intended to lift Water, Carbon, Metal Propellants to LEO+ and ships intended to navigate further out.
The further out ships might have smaller propellant tanks, and so less dry mass from the container and from that which is contained. These might refill at LEO+, GEO, L1, and Lunar Orbits, and indeed on the surface of the Moon. They also might not normally land on the surface of the Earth.
While at first all the Water, Carbon, and Metal Propellants will come from the Earth, eventually some may come from the Moon, and then later even from Photos, Deimos, Asteroids, and Mars.
Again Water, Carbon, and Metal Propellants could be kept benign during long trips to the Earth/Moon from those remote locations.
Ending Pending ![]()
This alternate Moon formation theory is of some interest. It may suggest a different history and perhaps a different nature of raw materials on the Moon that can be made into resources.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technolo … r-AA1SkA7u Quote:
What really created the moon? Scientists say it’s not just one impact, but this many!
Story by Sarah Jones • 2w •
3 min read
That is interesting, so what if the far side and near side materials are largely from two different objects? And then perhaps some materials from the Earth?
Ending Pending ![]()
I have to appreciate what China has discovered on the Moon: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … f953b99849 Quote:
The Moon Is Lying to Us — What China Found
Lunar soil is speculated to contain "hundreds of billions of tons of water." (Stated a 9.22 in the video). And I believe this does not refer to possible polar ice deposits.
https://blog.sciandnature.com/2025/01/c … es-us.html
Quote:
HomeAstronomyChina's New Moon Discovery Leaves the U.S. Stunned and Rewrites History
China's New Moon Discovery Leaves the U.S. Stunned and Rewrites History
There is Nitrogen in the Lunar soil, perhaps from Earth: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature03929
So, with Water and Carbon in the Lunar soil it is possible to have agriculture on the Moon, I speculate.
So, perhaps if we have a refilling station at the Earth/Moon "L1", water might come from the Moon eventually maybe even Carbon.
Ending Pending ![]()
I thought I would have a look at the projected relative cost for Cybercab by Tesla. It is basically an "Other" robot, on wheels.
https://www.greencarreports.com/news/11 … ut-details
Quote:
Around 20 cents per mile
The cost per mile for the Tesla Cybercab is projected to be around 20 cents per mile in operating costs, with total costs estimated at 30 to 40 cents per mile when including taxes and other expenses. Tesla aims to keep the Cybercab priced under $30,000, making it a competitive option in the autonomous transportation market.
https://www.nerdwallet.com/auto-loans/l … 719e2f6ea5
Quote:
Approximately $11,577 annually
The average cost of owning a car is approximately $11,577 annually according to AAA's 2025 study. This figure includes various expenses such as insurance, maintenance, fuel, and depreciation. In contrast, the average cost of a new car is around $48,759, while used cars average about $26,446.
NerdWallet
+2
So, $11,577 / 365 = $31.71 a day ????
So, you can afford 105.73 miles per day in Cybercab to equal the expense of the average car, if Cybercab costs $0.30 per mile????
So, you can afford 79.29 miles per day in Cybercab to equal the expense of the average car, if cybercab costs $0.40 per mile????
I have to double check the above.
I don't know if there will be a difference between Cybercab and Robovan.
Perhaps Robovan may be more for between cities.
But if you ride in these you could read and text, etc.
So, a cultural change, if it works out. Many people may drop the ownership of a car, and perhaps not own a car at all. That may reduce CO2 emissions and energy consumption.
This will render the USA not so stupid after all compared to mass transit in other countries. This will be relatively pandemic proof.
Covid was not transmitted much by touch, and the cars will be cleaned I think I recall.
Also, as a method of travel for criminal activity it will be a poor choice as the records of who, when, and where will be extensive.
So, maybe easier for the police to diagnose criminal patterns.
Reprimand me if the math is wrong.
Ending Pending ![]()
Well (th) I will entertain your query: https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 55#p236755
Quote:
For Void re Falcon 1 landing on the Moon ....
I don't know the answer to this, and would be interested if you can find out.
My question is inspired by your recent post about possibly using Falcon 9 upper stage as a Moon lander.
Can the Falcon 9 upper stage land on the Moon?
How does the Falcon 9 upper stage land on Earth?
If the Falcon 9 upper stage cannot currently land on Earth, what would it take to give it that ability?
Is it technically feasible? I assume it must be because others than SpaceX have landed on the Moon.
In reading my question, I realized you might be thinking of the first stage as a Moon lander,. and that is why you suggested sending the stage to orbit using a Starship?
May I have your permission to revise my question? Can the Falcon 9 first stage land on the Moon?
Does the Falcon 9 use GPS to know it's position when it is landing? Does it use radio signals from the ground at the landing site to help it determine it's position?
Does the software in the Falcon 9 first stage use the force of gravity in computing burns?
Would the software have to be modified?
These are all interesting questions that our readers might appreciate your investigating.
There are really two questions there, because your post specifically suggests the second stage.
Question? Why would you not make Lunar Landers out of Falcon 9 2nd Stages?
(th)
Offline
Like button can go here
Questions from (th):
Can the Falcon 9 upper stage land on the Moon?
How does the Falcon 9 upper stage land on Earth?
If the Falcon 9 upper stage cannot currently land on Earth, what would it take to give it that ability?
Is it technically feasible? I assume it must be because others than SpaceX have landed on the Moon.
At one point Elon Musk was considering making it into a "Mini-Starship". That was abandoned in order to focus on much larger sized Starships. The 2nd Stage of Falcon 9, I believe is of an Aluminum/Lithium Alloy which is lighter than Stainless Steel, except that the heat shield would be much heavier than for Stainless Steel. The 2nd Stage of Falcon 9 would burn up very fast in the atmosphere without a very, very good heat shield. Therefore the Falcon 9 2nd Stage does not land on Earth at all but is either abandoned to a higher orbit, or sent to burn up in the atmosphere.
The Falcon 9 1st stage if it does land does a "Hover Slam". It is a very tricky maneuver where somehow, they can calculate exactly how to throttle the engine down and when to shut the engine off. If they calculate wrong the engine cuts off too soon and the ship crashes. If they cut the engine off too late, the ship rises up again and then crashes. They cannot throttle the engine down enough to simply hover.
Starship and Superheavy can both hover, which is an improvement.
It would not be practical to get the Falcon 9 1st stage into LEO on it's own power. Perhaps some sort of Starship could lift it to LEO, but I am not sure that that would have a value.
The reason I am interested in bringing the Falcon 9 2nd Stage to Lunar orbit and then filling it and then landing it is that is is otherwise a throw away item. Although the Merlin Engines coke up after a while, I am hoping that it would have one more burn in it, if it was a used engine. One more burn to land some robots or other instruments to a location. Maybe supplies to a base. It itself could be valuable at a base for its metals.
Let's suppose that we had a propellants depot in Lunar Proximity. You might use electric rockets to deliver RP-1 and water to it from LEO.
The depot would be capable of cracking the water into Oxygen and Hydrogen, in a quantity suitable to fill one Falcon 9 2nd stage. Then you could land it. (I have not stipulated any use for the Hydrogen Yet).
It would seem that the 2nd stage would have an even worse problem with throttling down the engine to land on the Moon, but that might be corrected by loading it down with a sufficient amount of Cargo. Legs would have to be added to the assembly, I propose that they be made of materials wanted on the surface of the Moon, perhaps of Carbon and Plastics as much as possible.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Another interesting use for such a 2nd Stage would be to boost a Starship back to Earth from Lunar Orbit. Merlins are not as efficient or powerful as Raptors, but there propellant "RP-1" can be stored and transferred much better than Methane.
Water Similarly could be transferred to a Lunar Proximate Depot much easier than Oxygen.
In both the case of RP-1 and Water, the vapor pressures being low at low temperatures you would not need active cooling during transfer by electric rocket. This is a benefit because electric propulsion is slow and if you had to have active cooling hardware on the ship it would be excess mass, and would demand some of the electric energy budget. If you had to spend tha extra electricity, then you have to have larger solar panels or a larger nuclear reactor, which then adds even more mass.
But if you bring RP-1 and water to a Lunar Proximate space station which largely holds position then that station can have a very large power supply which you might manipulate the propellants. In the case of Falcon 9 2nd Stage, the RP-1 just has to be warmed up a bot to be fluid enough to pump, The water can be split into LOX and Hydrogen. Since the Station does not move much it can have a massive power supply with a lot of inertia and can then be used to prevent the boil-off of the LOX.
We might microwave the Hydrogen to provide propulsion for station keeping.
Let's consider "L1" for the Station. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange_point
Quote: ![]()
Sorry, that is the Sun/Earth L1 not the Earth/Moon L1. I will seek a more appropriate diagram.
This perhaps: https://www.thespacereview.com/article/2882/1
Image Quote: 
Starship might be able to grab used Falcon 9 2nd stages from LEO, and bring them to a electric tug which would bring them and "RP-1" and water to the station at "L1". The Station at "L1" would warm the "RP-1" for filling the Falcon 9 2nd Stages. It would also crack the water into LOX and Hydrogen. The Hydrogen might be used for Station keeping, being ejectred for propulsion from a VASIMR engine.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variable_ … sma_Rocket
Some station keeping is needed at "L1" as it it a bit unstable.
Now this leaves the question, would then Falcon 9 2nd Stage have enough power to go to the Moon and actually land with a payload? Well, I am not sure. If not, then the Station needs to be in the orbit of the Moon, closer into it. In which case the Hydrogen thrust will also be wanted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
For the case of Hydro-Lox spacecraft the same method could be used but just with Water, no RP-1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In the case of Starship and other Metha-Lox methods, I am hoping that the station can take Hydrogen from the water and use it to cook the RP-1 into Methane. Not entirely confident for that.
But if you did have used Falcon 9 2nd stages you might use them to boost Starship while burning RP-1 and LOX>
But of course, Merlins get Carboned up.
I think that shipping a stable hydrocarbon and water to a processing refilling station might make sense. I already explained why that could be compatible with electric propulsion such as Magdrive or Neumann Drive. You might also ship Carbon or Dry Ice to get the proper balance of Carbon, Oxygen, and Hydrogen atoms to create the various propellants with.
I hope that that helps (th).
Ask for more if you like.
Ending Pending ![]()
Ending Pending.
This is an amendment to the just prior post #213.
Question? Why would you not make Lunar Landers out of Falcon 9 2nd Stages?
IF Firefly/Magdrive can resupply a fuel depot/maker in proximity to the Moon, you may be able to refill Falcon 9 2nd stages and put legs on them an use them as landers.
I think if you put enough cargo on them then you could throttle the engines so that you don't have to do a hoverslam???
Or so what if you do a Hoverslam and it works that is just fine.
The 2nd stages are made of a Lithium/Aluminum alloy, I believe and so they are relatively light.
You could attach the cargo to the landing legs so that the device will not be topple prone.
The Merlines Carbon up with use, but you would only be using them one time to land. You could reuse those want to LEO, or you could bring fresh ones up with Starship, and ship them to Lunar proximity with Magdrive.
Ending Pending ![]()
You could make the Falcon 9 system fully reusable in a way by selling Lunar landings using Falcon 9 modified 2nd stages to land in various places on the Moon for surveying purposes. This could be supported by a Starship that stays in Lunar orbit and then may return to Earth.
Ending Pending :
So, I am continuing to be interested in the concepts that Firefly projects, and that of Magdrive and Neumann drive. Those and of course the heavy lift capabilities in development such as SpaceX, Blue Origin, Rocket Lab Plus ULA?
The idea of depots in CIS Lunar Space, is growing. Blue Origin has the notion of actively cooled Hydro-Lox, and some have speculated on low boil off methods for SpaceX Metha-Lox.
I am wondering about stored Jet fuel and water. We already think about generating Oxygen and Methane on Mars from CO2 and Water.
Could you do it in Lunar Orbit, using Jet Fuel and Water? I said Jet fuel, but really, I indicate fuel for Merlin Engines. That fuel and water are low risk for boil off. They are the Low Maintenance companions, I think. Using Magdrive or Neumann Drive you might slowly move depots of them to a Lunar proximity, while having low maintenance costs for the preservation of the fuel and water.
Could you split the Hydrogen off of the water to produce Oxygen and then add that Hydrogen to the "Jet Fuel", to produce Methane?
Perhaps some kind of solar hot process might do that? I know that it might want to produce other Hydrocarbons, but I would have a look at it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_fuel
Quote:
Melting point −47 °C (−53 °F; 226 K)
Boiling point 176 °C (349 °F; 449 K)
So, it seems that in CIS Lunar Space, it might be possible to store both the Jet Fuel and Water as gel or ice. Neither one has a very high vapor pressure I expect. I think that makes them low maintenance.
And that brings up some interesting possible options as to if you could push either one of them out of a spaceship in the night side of the Moon during a landing event and then recover the substances before they evaporated. That way your landing legs do not have to be as strong. There could easily be locations on the Moon which will have no Carbon or Hydrogen to make fuel with. Oxygen is fairly ubiquitous on the Moon.
But my primary interest is in a orbital depot in proximity of the Moon where Jet Fuel and water can be refined into various propellants.
Propellants for a Merlin Engine.
Propellants for a Hydro-Lox Engine
Propellants for a Metha-Lox Engine.
I will note that the stored products, "Jet Fuel" and Water will make good radiation protection. So, the Merlin engines perhaps should be respected a little more as you can perhaps use "Jet Fuel" and Water as shielding before you use them for propellants. Yes, you can do that with Methane and Hydrogen also but then you are suffering boiloff and cryogenic burdens.
The Jet fuel might also be subjected to electrolysis, if necessary to produce various materials.
Firefly intends to transport hypergolic propellant as I seem to recall. I think that they could transport "Jet Fuel" and Water.
Also, it may be that water from the Moon will be worth lifting up to Lunar orbit, so then all you would send to Lunar Orbit would be Jet fuel.
In case you are new to this topic this post, #212, describes Magdrive: https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 13#p236713
So, if it can all work as I hope it can this would be a very good tool kit for expanding into Space.
We also might consider if "Jet Fuel" could be transported to Phobos and Deimos, using Magdrive. The two moons almost certainly can yield Oxygen so there would be no need to send water. So a refilling method could be established in Mars orbit, I feel.
Ending Pending ![]()
I am wondering if large metal shells could be made on the Moon using some sort of 3D printing methods. Relativity Space may have a process that could perhaps show a way.
But before large metal shells, you would need large amounts of suitable metals.
Stainless Steel? Chromium?
Well, here is something about Chromium on the Moon: https://lunarpedia.org/w/Chromium
Quote:
Geologic surveys of the moon have located vast deposits of chromite on the Sinus Aestuum, covering an area thousands of square kilometers in size[3]. It is believed that these deposits are located all across the moon, but are buried in deeper layers, and that the deposits on the Sinus Aestuum are the result of a meteorite impact blasting away the overburden.
This situation where a buried substance was exposed by an impact event also seems to be related to Orange soil that and Apollo mission found. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2 … 040233.htm
Quote:
Apollo 17
The Apollo mission that found orange volcanic soil is Apollo 17, which landed in the Taurus-Littrow valley on the Moon in December 1972. Astronaut Harrison Schmidt noticed the unusual orange soil near the landing site, which turned out to be rich in volcanic glass beads formed during ancient fire-fountain eruptions approximately 3.64 billion years ago. These tiny glass beads, each less than 1 mm across, provide valuable insights into the Moon's explosive volcanic history and its geological evolution.
S
So usually we do not think of "Ore Bodies" on the Moon, but it seems that there may be some. They may tend to be covered over with mixed up boring regolith.
But magnetic Iron may be available in that boring regolith in small amounts. Less than 1% is typical, I believe.
Now I stumbled on something Calliban might like: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8081250/
Quote:
Iron can be microbially extracted from Lunar and Martian regolith simulants and 3D printed into tough structural materials
Image Quote: 
Otherwise, I believe that roasting regolith in Hydrogen gas at significant temperature might also be used to reduce Iron. https://www.youtube.com/@Anthrofuturism actually thinks that such a process will gain and not lose Hydrogen as the regolith has some Hydrogen in it.
This is more complex than what I need but it is good: https://sites.wustl.edu/meteoritesite/i … unar-soil/ Quote:
Major Elements – In lunar rocks and soils 98–99% of the mass consists of 7 chemical elements
This one has a useful listing of materials in it: https://www.bing.com/search?q=Chart%20o … 8CF79273BF
Image Quote: 
Image Quote: 
Image Quote: 
So, it seems like if you want Iron and Oxygen the Maria maybe best. If you want Iron, Aluminum, and Oxygen then the Highlands are better, but you get less Iron.
If I understand things correctly it is easiest to get Oxygen off of Iron.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Now a little bet on Mars Derangement Syndrome.
It is my opinion that the Cake Eaters have programed you all for failure. Their agenda is that technological people will serve them to make cushy nests for them on Earth, where they can use their verbal skills to usurp the destiny of the human race to serve their low purposes of being pampered.
Therefore, the Mars Roach Motel.
The game is to say that the Moon is useless, and to say "Go fetch Mars". And then to make sure by various devices that humans to Mars is a dead end. They will allow technological development, as long as they can divert funds to their chosen few from it, but will again and again break the back of anything that seems to be about to achieve the goal.
And they play you for fools.
The Moon and Mars is not an "OR" function, it is an "AND" function.
Any Moon effort could provide Metals for Magdrive and Neumann Drive. It also can provide Oxygen, and maybe water for efforts to access small worlds.
Among these could be Bennu, and Ryugu, but also Phobos and Deimos.
So, you would be gaining capabilities to access Mars as well.
Do not let prancing academic princelings scam you into having them as your reward for space efforts. We should want hard results, not Ivory Tower Dwellers as our reward.
Ending Pending ![]()
By imposition and agreement, the focus of this topic> https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=11271
"Index» Business Proposals» Data Centers (Including Off World)"
Is kept narrower than I would like. So, since the Moon seems such a good case for it, I will seek to develop it further here.
The view now indicates that things are already under intentions:
1) Starlink like networks.
2) Sun-Synchronous AI networks for Inference AI.
3) Moon development, with Neuralink.
4) Asteroid Mining.
This full set of objectives, achieved would give a chance at a worthwhile existence, I feel.
An Oxygen Bubble Radiator with internally nested sub-radiator systems is what interests me at this moment.
Checking the inventory of materials on the Moon 40-45% Oxygen and the rest being mostly metals and Silicon. The total amount of Oxygen Bubble Radiators that could be created is vast.
Collecting solar power to electricity and dumping the heat from AI will require suitable heat sinks, and I think Oxygen Bubble Radiators may do well for the purpose.
From that mentioned topic I have this: https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 02#p236702
Quote:
I will add this attempt:
Quote:
So, we might consider a "Nested String Of Pearls Radiator Method":
On the Moon I am imagining very large Oxygen Cylinders laying on their sides.
I have previously suggested Oxygen at 1/3 bar, to be compatible with Humans and to decrease fire risk and to reduce the needed structural strength. But I suppose higher pressures could be used.
After all Oxygen Cylinders on Earth don't seem to catch fire from pure Oxygen inside, so there must be some method to provide for that.
But if people are inside, then fire risk and breathing methods would need addressing.
I do not intend long term human habitation as radiation protection would run counter to the desire to radiate heat.
Where previously I mentioned only the shadowed craters of the Moon, I think much of the high latitudes would do, as you can put up vertical or angled walls of solar panels to capture energy and to shade the radiators.
In realty Neuralink and Virtual Reality could allow a person on the Earth to have one or more robot bodies on the Moon that it could temporarily inhabit with the persons consciousness.
So, if you had 10 billion people on Earth, you might have 20 billion Robots on the Moon, and perhaps 10 billion Robots on Earth. People's minds may have one or more Avatars more than their human body.
There are various ideas for moving mass from the Moon. There are matter projectors, and there are Elevator and Tether lifting concepts.
I myself am a bit interested in Magdrive and/or Neumann Drive to project matter to a receiver. This might be done with conductive materials such as Metals, Iron, Aluminum, Copper, (Maybe other).
If by some means you can move mass from the Moon to its orbits, then Magdrive or Neumann Drive could be used for Asteroid missions to get materials from the asteroids to the Earth/Moon sub-system.
I have shown radiator fins to double as impactor protection. Solar panels might also do some of that.
Or you might employ rows of chevron fins.
Anyway, lets imagine that eventually 50% of the Moons surface would be mostly covered in Oxygen Radiators.
While solar energy might be collected on the Moons surface, it might also be beamed down to the Moon form power plants in orbits.
And I do not prohibit the use of other power sources as they may be available.
Ending Pending ![]()
I have been trying to evaluate the potential of MagDrive. This seems like a good introduction: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … &FORM=VIRE
Quote:
Scientists Test Revolutionary Space Thruster: Space Metals as a Fuel to Go Where No One Has Gone
YouTube
NASA Space News
32K views
Like other electric thrust systems, this one might suffer from the inertia of the power plant it needs. That could be solar panels or a nuclear reactor.
But if lasers could beam power from a power station to solar cells on the Magdrive, the efficiency can be rather good as I understand it. These solar cells would be tuned for the frequency of the laser beam. So, that could reduce mass and so reduce inertia.
SpaceX is considering one time use tanker Starships to support Lunar Activities. It is said that they can lift 250 to 300 tons of cargo to LEO.
The dry mass of the starship is perhaps 80 to 120 tons. So, maybe estimate 100 tons.
So, that is about 350 to 400 tons of metals to LEO.
And Magdrive is said to have an ISP of about 2000, which might be 5 times as good as raptor?
So, if that were sort of true, then ignoring the complications of Apples/vs/Oranges, perhaps the equivalent of 2000 tons of propellants in LEO while flying just one tanker ship to LEO.
So, a scheme where you might push depots of various propellants to Lunar orbits, and also various orbits of the Earth/Moon, might extend the capability of the Starship system quite a lot.
And if metal propellants can be got from the Moon for a reasonable cost, this would extend things even more.
I wonder if Starships on the Moon, refilled with Oxygen on the Moon and lifting Metal payloads, could then be refilled in Lunar orbit with Methane from Earth. I wonder if that would be worthwhile?
Ending Pending ![]()
I think that cold resource will of course be different for different situation.
The one I have suggested so far may be best suitable for the Shadowed Craters of the Moon.
I presume that power will be beamed into the crater, or alternately nuclear energy would be available to power the data centers.
There is some hope that the Moon may have some CO2 in the coldest spots. Otherwise, Carbon might need importing.
The hope is that canisters can be made that will be able to hold a compressed Oxygen volume, at low cost. This would be the outer shell radiator.
On the Moon, impactors might be a problem that could puncture the outer shell, but as I have said before, that shell could just be patched, and the shell be refilled with Oxygen.
https://scitechdaily.com/the-moons-top- … 000-years/
Quote:
Approximately 45%
The Moon contains approximately 45% oxygen in its regolith, which is the layer of rock and fine dust covering the lunar surface. This oxygen is trapped within minerals such as silica, aluminum, iron, and magnesium oxides, which dominate the Moon's landscape. If extracted, this oxygen could potentially support human life on the Moon for a very long time, with estimates suggesting enough oxygen to sustain billions of people for about 100,000 years.
So, using Oxygen in canisters as the outer stage radiator, therefore makes sense to me. Also, if Oxygen is needed for an emergency purpose, then these containers will hold some.
I have suggested Oxygen at 1/3 bar, only because I do not want to promote fire and do not want the chamber walls to have to hold a high pressure. But perhaps other pressures will be considered for an advantage after this might be tried.
Then running CO2 filled heat exchangers inside of the chambers, you might use forced convection and even heat pumps to distribute heat from the CO2 into the Oxygen.
At another point elsewhere a heat exchanger might dump heat out of water from a data center into the CO2.
So, perhaps this could be a money printer on the Moon, if it works.
https://3dprintingindustry.com/news/int … ng-241578/
Quote:
The concept of 3D printing metal shells on the Moon is still in the early stages of development, but several projects are paving the way for this ambitious goal. Here are some key points to consider:
Metal 3D Printing: The first metal 3D printer for space, developed by Airbus for the European Space Agency (ESA), is set to be tested aboard the ISS. This printer will enable the production of load-bearing structural parts that are more resilient than plastic equivalents, greatly improving astronauts' autonomy.
1
Lithography-based Metal Manufacturing (LMM): Incus, in collaboration with the ESA, OHB System, and Lithoz, has demonstrated the feasibility of using recycled metal waste for 3D printing in a lunar environment. This technology, known as LMM, uses photopolymerization to create advanced metal parts.
1
Sustainability and Zero-Waste: The LMM process is designed to be sustainable and zero-waste, making it a promising candidate for producing high-quality printed parts directly on the Moon. The project aims to turn lunar scrap metals and resources into high-quality printed parts, enabling the production of spare parts directly on the Moon.
1
In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU): The concept of ISRU involves leveraging available materials in space to support ongoing missions, such as creating fuel, building materials, or constructing spare parts. This approach aligns with the goal of establishing a viable lunar economy.
1
Challenges and Solutions: While 3D printing in space presents its own set of technical challenges, such as size and contamination by lunar dust, companies like Incus are working on solutions to overcome these obstacles. Their Hammer Lab35 printer uses recycled titanium powder and has shown strength comparable to conventional metal injection molded titanium parts.
1These developments indicate a promising future for 3D printing metal shells on the Moon, with the potential to significantly reduce the dependence on Earth for manufacturing materials and support a sustainable lunar economy.
33 Sources
Created canisters might have features which may be protective from punctures from impactors. Scale like radiator fins might absorb some impacts without impactors actually puncturing the Oxygen envelope.
It might also be possible to make structures out of glassy materials as well.
It might be possible to transmit power with lasers into the craters. The laser sources could be high spots on the Moon, or even orbital devices.
Special tuned solar cells can receive these laser beams with a fair efficiency.
https://interestingengineering.com/spac … y-to-earth
Quote:
The concept of transmitting power in space using laser beams is a promising technology that could revolutionize energy distribution. Here are some key points about this innovative approach:
Space-based Power Transmission: Companies like Aetherflux and Overview Energy are developing systems to harvest solar energy in orbit and beam it back to Earth, enhancing global energy distribution.
1
DARPA's POWER Program: DARPA's Persistent Optical Wireless Energy Relay (POWER) program has set records for transmitting power over distance, demonstrating the feasibility of wirelessly sending power across miles.
2
NTT Space Environment and Energy Laboratories: This research focuses on space solar power systems (SSPSs) that convert solar energy into laser light or microwaves on a geostationary satellite orbiting the Earth, transmitting it to the ground for use.
1
Laser Wireless Power Transmission: The Laser-based SSPS (L-SSPS) aims to send solar-powered laser energy from space to Earth, where it is converted into electricity.
1These advancements in laser technology and space-based power transmission are paving the way for a more efficient and sustainable energy future. [^image1^]
5 Sources
Of course, on the Moon you don't have to be concerned with atmosphere.
So, maybe Tesla & SpaceX and others can establish an industry on the Moon for AI training.
Ending Pending ![]()
I will add this attempt: 
I am donating the idea, just maybe it would have value or stimulate a better concept.
I you are on a stony world such as the Moon, then Carbon and Nitrogen are in short supply.
In the diagram I show I show a CO2 Pipe nested insider of low pressure O2 filled chambers.
In a gravitational field, we might rely on natural convection to flow cooled O2 against the CO2 pipe. But to hurry up the heat rejection, using fans to make the flow forced and higher speed.
So, we might consider a "Nested String Of Pearls Radiator Method": 
The thing is the Pearls protect the CO2 Linear Radiator from things like impactors. If a Pearl gets ruptured, then all you lose is some Oxygen, which on a Stony world or most worlds is extremely abundant and almost a waste gas except for things like humans breathing and fire.
Liquid CO2 might be a coolant for Data Centers directly or could cool water using a heat exchanger.
I believe that if Liquid CO2 freezes it may not rupture the pipes. But water very likely could rupture the pipes.
I hope that this will be a helpful tool for Data Centers in Space.
Ending Pending ![]()
I do not advise other people to invest in Tesla, or if a possible SpaceX, but I need to make the point that some people understand, that Tesla is not just a electric car company, but is expanding well beyond that, and is drifting towards, a partnership with SpaceX and other Elon Musk related companies.
The Data Center plan will be connectable with high capability robotics on the Moon. While having some humans on the Moon is a good plan, I think, most manipulation of objects would be done by such a community of AI guided robots.
Ending Pending ![]()
This is an interesting record: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … 9d95aa5451 Quote:
Apollo 17's Astronaut Harrison Schmitt Reveals Everything He Discovered On The Moon
YouTube
Top Master
So, I am guessing that there are "Ore Bodies" on the Moon in some places.
Ending Pending ![]()
If you want a possible business play, (th), "TSLA" (Tesla) may be partnered with SpaceX to build the space Data Centers.
If you own Tesla Stock, and SpaceX does an IPO, you might get consideration on getting a favorable opportunity to buy SpaceX IPO stock.
But that may be conditional on having the stock for some time period. I don't know.
Peter Zeihan seems to think that TESLA is worthless. But he also does not seem to be aware, that TESLA is working with Aluminum and Sodium Batteries. P. Zeihan seems to think that they are subject to Lithium scarcity.
So, for these stocks, "Buyer Be Ware". The danger is always actual. But rewards are also possible.
Ending Pending ![]()
(th) you can move this or clone it somewhere else if you like as I feel that this topic can also be useful to train members to understand the contents of the topic.
Ending Pending ![]()
If this is redundant then give me instructions and corrections can be made.
This seems to be useful for an introduction: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … 7af08cdd97 Quote:
Predicted Elon's Mars AI Plan One Year Ago
YouTube
Next Big Future
2 views
I a few weeks ago that "inference Compute" can tolerate space radiation fairly well.
Now I understand that "Training Compute", needs more shelter than that.
https://www.clarifai.com/blog/training-vs-inference/
Quote:
Two distinct phases in the AI lifecycle
Inference Compute and Training Compute
Inference Compute and Training Compute are two distinct phases in the AI lifecycle. Training Compute involves feeding labeled examples into an algorithm to learn patterns and relationships, while Inference Compute is when the trained model applies those patterns to new data. Training is typically done offline and involves high-performance GPUs or TPUs, whereas Inference Compute can run on diverse hardware, including servers and edge devices, and is often more resource-intensive due to its continuous operation.
Clarifai
+4
So inference in orbit is best with lower time latency, I believe I understand, but training can be useful even if on the Moon and/or Mars, if it is sufficiently protected from radiation and if abundant cooling and of course energy are available.
So, the cold of polar craters on the Moon and Ice bodies on Mars, are valuable if they are coupled with massive amounts of energy.
For the Moon orbital power stations probably could beam power to the craters, but surface energy would be good also.
For Mars, solar power satellites could make sense, as you have Phobos and Deimos for raw materials to build them out of. Of course dust storm activity is some degree of problem for Mars, at this time.
Ending Pending ![]()
I wanted to find this video, which I saw on my smart phone: "+Utube, He Walked on the Moon in 1971, Now David Scott Reveals What they Realy Discovered Up There, 1d ago"
But as often happens no.
I found a different video, but the one above pointed out that Hadley Rill had volcanic flow layers. That is many eruptions formed the layers.
Often I am given the impression that the surface of the Moon melted and then solidified. But it was not a one time thing:
Alternate videos:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J22hKd8SZp8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhLkDOEPWzA
So, the point is, I think that if sequential eruptions happened as the magma reservoirs solidified, the materials in each layer might be different.
There is some question about the idea that the Moon was bone dry. The 15 mission showed some water. And the video I could not get indicated that the Moon may have some amount of water in it's interior. I have to wonder if some lava flows might have more than others.
Ending Pending ![]()
I see that you expressed an opinion about the President and tariffs.
And then you have stirred in most of the tool kit of virtue signaling. NAZI, Racist, etc.
You reveal that you are not much different than us. You did not do the gender card yet though. I guess because you are of the "M" gender.
My message to you was mostly that the surface story is shallow and does not account for deeper processes that we both should more properly be concerned about.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
But lets have a specific look at Tariffs. I actually was a bit concerned about the actions taken by the President and his actions. I think I am still waiting to see how the Legislature and Supreme Court behave. Those two together have the powers to hobble what the President and company are doing if they want to. But they seem to be allowing it.
https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R48435
Quote:
The president has the authority to apply tariffs under certain conditions, primarily through delegated powers from Congress. The U.S. Constitution grants Congress the power to regulate commerce and levy tariffs, but since the 1930s, Congress has delegated some of this authority to the president through various statutes. For instance, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 allows the president to impose tariffs in response to national security threats. However, the president's ability to impose tariffs is subject to specific conditions and judicial scrutiny, ensuring that any delegation of authority is not unchecked.
I myself consider that economics is basic to security. So, I am willing to entertain that the President may do much of what he is doing with the understanding that the other powers could revise his permissions if they wanted to.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So, now lets talk about NAZI, Justice, and Mercy. The NAZI label is used with questionable evidence. The most appropriate attachment of labels is to the Ukraine ethnic group which historically as a read from the internet, not all of them but some of them at certain times. They worked in service for the WWII NAZI effort to make hostile actions against Jewish and Polish people.
I have not seen the MEGA expressing NAZI viewpoints. It is quite likely that there are some NAZI sentiments in various places, but the MEGA policy does not seem to support a hateful set of actions of that sort.
Justice says that America is reserved for its Citizens, with some pathways for other non-citizens to join. It is justified to remove violators, but it is not of a large mercy to do so.
When the process of exploiting mercy to judge America is used by outsiders such as from Brittain and West Europe, it is not moral. If they feel that people removed from America should have mercy, then they can go to a place like Somalia, and spend their money to give mercy to the people that have been expelled. Canadians are also permitted to spend their money, to help out people deported from America. You can spend all your money on Mercy if you want to.
Do, that before putting judgement on America.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Vertical and Horizontal domination.
If we were to view the world as I do, two special polarities can be observed. China and Sub-Saharan Africa could be considered for this.
All Caucasian genes and also the genes of Eurasians and Peripheral Africa exist between these two, and only marginally inside ot the two major polarities. Eliminate the Oceans and you will discover that "We are all surrounded" by other groups.
Examine China Domination methods. Minor ethnic groups are held in "Tribal" Zones. This is horizontal control.
Vertical Domination is done more by the Sub-Saharan Africans. There was a slave trade in the "Kongo", with or without any Caucasian "Genes". Massive profits were given to these core kingdoms in the "Dark" of Africa, until the Brits and French stopped them.
https://www.worldhistory.org/Kingdom_of_Kongo/
Quote:
The Kingdom of Kongo was a significant player in the Atlantic slave trade, with its kings observing a distinction between foreign-born captives and freeborn Kongos. Over time, this distinction blurred, leading to all Kongos becoming subject to enslavement and sale overseas. The internal conflicts within the kingdom contributed to the collapse of institutions and the redefinition of polity, affecting who could be enslaved and the nature of the slave trade.
World History Encyclopedia
+1The Kingdom of Kongo's history is marked by its expansion, military conquest, and centralization of power, which were driven by the desire to acquire slaves. The kingdom's wealth was bolstered by the slave trade, which was expanded by Portuguese traders in the late 15th century. The Kongo state collapsed in the early 18th century, but the kingdom's legacy as a strong power in west-central Africa remains a significant part of its history.
The first slave owner in the USA: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_J … (colonist)
Read about his background and ethnicity.
The Atlantic slave trade was an infection that pushed its way into America. Something like Mafia, with profits allowing its expansion.
In the USA you can find a contrast between Horizontal and Vertical Domination. The two do not always want to play nice together, and so the Civil War.
The Horizontal people do not want slavery for the reason that they might not want to be turned into "White Trash" and run off of their land by what they consider "Unfair Competition" by vertical slave owners.
And this slave culture is still trying to encroach on the Horizontal people. So, Dixie has been in a game of conquest since about the Great Depression. The Getto's, Slums, all an effort to encroach on the Horizontal people and give power to the "Owner Classes", who then exploit the the servant group that they sent to the Getto's/Slums.
The problem of West Europe is that it is mostly Vertical and so sees it's morality as supreme over that of North America and Russia/Eurasia.
The line of cities Dublin, London, Paris, Rome, Athens, Cario, all Vertical and feminine in nature. The Harlots actually. (At least some of the time).
So, at some point it should not surprise you that the USA does not want to be Western European. We have our Eurasian part as well.
"Plantation Owners", in their gated communities, virtue signaling to an extreme of how superior they are. They always think that they being the rich ruling class, they can master the situation to their advantage.
I have been told by a relative that the "Mansons" were of the opinion that a race war was to be, and that the so called "Blacks", would win it, but they would be so stupid that they would need the "Mansons" to rule over them.
And that is where I believe that the democrat party of course is the party of the Vertical. And some of the rulers of that structure could be the Obama's.
So, every place that Canadians might think themselves to a people of high morals above Americans, really you are just an import from London and Paris, in a soup of Native American people of horizontal power.
We in America have worked on making the joining of the two powers, Horizontal and Vertical. In Europe, they have done all they can to create basically an endless civil war between Eurasians and Eurafricans. Canada is poised between America and Europe and your desire to avoid American solutions to reality only pots you as outsiders to this continent.
It was easy for Canadians to Judge Americans for Segregation, as it was also possible to use servant peoples to fight in the wars of your empire. We in the North USA also Judged the ruling peoples of the "South" then we got what we disserved, judged by the world, which decided that they wanted to use any possible means to damage America.
So, per the Ukraine, at this time after all the wrong moves by West Europe and their fan people in the USA, a best solution is to split the land, and the ethnic parts, and bring an end to the killing. Later it may be possible to try yet again to stich Europe into a more advanced culture.
You see we don't see ourselves as your inferiors, just a troubled people who have had to ray to make a better world.
Ending Pending ![]()
Robert,
They might as well do 3 or 4 things that outrage you, because it is a case of "Show me the person and I will find the crime".
The people wo complain are the ones who are free riding on a showboat and will be sorry if and when it goes down and they discover that there are Alligators in the water.
Venezuela? Nigeria? Greenland? Trump might as well trigger all of them and eve more, because you have already judged him and choose to be ignorant about the actual structure of reality.
Playing Judge, Judas, executioner as often as you can find an excuse. Even the British and European churches playing Judas and trying to deliver us to crucifixion. Such evil with pretense to goodness.
Europeans, and yes maybe some Canadians and Americans, who want to take the car and drive us into disaster, because then can sell their brothers and sisters to a foreign power, just to beg for approval from people who want us gone and our lives destroyed.
You do not see the deeps, and you do not know the pitfalls.
You are not nearly as smart as you want to think you are.
Snap out of it and stand with honor, or you will be abandoned to your fate.
Ending Pending ![]()
Looking at Firefly's propellant methods, caused me to think about the Dragon Draco engines:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SuperDraco
Quote:
SuperDraco engines
The SpaceX Dragon spacecraft utilizes SuperDraco engines for its launch escape system, providing fault-tolerant propulsion. These engines are part of the SpaceX Draco family and are designed to be fired many months after fueling and launch due to their storable hypergolic propellant. The SuperDraco engines combine the functions of both a reaction control system and a main propulsive engine, offering increased reliability for the spacecraft. They are used on crew transport flights to low Earth orbit and were also projected to be used for entry, descent, and landing control of the now-canceled Red Dragon to Mars. The SuperDraco engines are capable of delivering over 100 times the thrust of the original Draco thruster engines, making them a significant advancement in SpaceX's propulsion technology.
Wikipedia
+2
And then there is this, for deorbit of the ISS: https://www.space.com/spacex-dragon-iss … n-revealed
Image Quote: 
Quote:
artist's impression of a cone-shaped spacecraft, powered by solar arrays, firing its engines while docked to the international space station. the curve of earth and black of space is visible behind
Artist's impression of the SpaceX Dragon variant that will serve as a deorbit vehicle for the International Space Station. (Image credit: SpaceX)
So, you would have Metha-Lox of some vendors, and Hydro-Lox of other vendors, and electric propulsion. and Hypergolic propulsions.
So, that might provide some interesting options.
Ending Pending ![]()
I like this: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … &FORM=VIRE Quote:
Space Tugs and Propellant Stations: Firefly's Blueprint for a Cislunar Supply Network
YouTube
Space Startup News
4 views
I think that the concept of crashing used propellant cartridges onto the Moon to recycle the Aluminum is rather interesting. "Poincare Basin" is mentioned for a crash location at about 8.23 in the video track,
So, the "Backbone" of it at first would be some kind of electric rocket moving Hypergolic propellants to refill stations, it sounds like. But later other liquid propellants that are subject to boil-off might be supported as well.
That makes me wonder if the propulsion method can be combined with that of Starship or other ships using Oxygen and Hydrogen or Methane. I presume that Starship is a major candidate to lift the firefly hardware and propellants to orbit, but then perhaps the Firefly thrust systems could be used to help move Starship from place to place.
That then modifies the travel process if it can be done at that scale.
Endind Pending ![]()
.
According to this video, the Orange Man cannot use the National Guard in sanctuary cities the way he was trying to.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4M9YbxGAqc
Quote:
The Supreme Court ACTUALLY DID IT.
MattMorseTV
Merry Christmas!
I want to balance the accounts a bit. The last post I made had a story about how a certain set of entities were the criminals of our history.
This one gives an idea of how reality at the international level is rather close to the "Law of the Jungle": https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … fff91c494c Quote:
The Secret History: How America 'Bought' The British Empire
YouTube
History Meets Economic
I was fairly aware of the bigger part of this already.
I guess I might attempt to claim that America's resentment for history and certain actors, made it desirable to make sure that such levels of power could not be exhorted on again. But I regret the burden that the British people had to endure.
I might try to argue that the method to conclude WWI as said to be enforced by France and Britain onto the Germans, may have brought Hitler to power.
Who is the chicken that laid the egg that hatched into a worse chicken? It goes on and on.
Ending Pending ![]()
Here is another article about Natural or Gold Hydrogen: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technolo … r-AA1SrJCA Quote:
Morning Overview
31.1K Followers
New hydrogen method could power humanity for millennia
Story by Cassian Holt • 1w •
8 min read
If it is true that Mars does have deep waters many km down and icy permafrost above it, then Mars may be very ideal for this
A point being that rather than pumping water up from so far down, if Natural Hydrogen from the water does exist, then you could create all the water you wanted anywhere on Mars by reacting the Hydrogen with CO2 from the atmosphere.
As a matter of fact, you could grow microbes that would do the reaction for you, producing food and heat.
This is an interesting article which deviates from the topic, as it says how to generate Methane from H2 and CO2 using a nuclear reactor.
https://www.earth.com/news/scientists-a … e-methane/
Quote:
Scientists added bacteria to a reactor and achieved something that seemed impossible
Jordan Joseph
ByJordan Joseph
Earth.com staff writer
subscribe
x
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/bi … 33753/full
Quote:
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 29 August 2021
Sec. Industrial Biotechnology
Volume 9 - 2021 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.733753
From Biogas and Hydrogen to Microbial Protein Through Co-Cultivation of Methane and Hydrogen Oxidizing Bacteria
Frederiek-Maarten Kerckhof,&#x;Frederiek-Maarten Kerckhof1,2†Myrsini Sakarika,&#x;Myrsini Sakarika1,2†Marie Van GielMarie Van Giel1Maarten MuysMaarten Muys3Pieter VermeirPieter Vermeir4Jo De VriezeJo De Vrieze1Siegfried E. Vlaeminck,Siegfried E. Vlaeminck2,3Korneel Rabaey,Korneel Rabaey1,2Nico Boon,
Nico Boon1,2*
So, if it is true that both Earth and Mars, may have enormous Hydrogen deposits', then that can be a source of electricity, food, and heat.
A form of thinking on this would be factories in diving bell buildings in ice covered bodies of water. If your industry occurs in such then then waste heat from the machines, can be distributed into the water.
And in addition, the waste heat itself might supply energy at times by rejecting it to atmosphere.
In a special case should it be possible to extract water from polar ice to such a body of water, you could vent steam to the outside to turn a turbine.
Anyway, it would be quite an asset to have on both planets.
Ending Pending ![]()
Happy winter solstice (About now), and Merry Christmas!
December 21
Winter Solstice – When Is Winter 2025 and 2026?
The winter solstice in 2025 will occur on December 21. This date marks the shortest day and longest night of the year in the Northern Hemisphere.