You are not logged in.
Lockheed Martin's animation of "Destination: Space 2050" vision
Offline
NASA Is Desperately Trying to Mine the Moon Before China Gets There
https://www.popularmechanics.com/space/ … ning-race/
or certain deep spooky gay clown gets repeatedly quoted
so why not quote him?
or is it wiser to quote Peter Zeihan Stratfor Charlatan Comedy Show, or just a globalist who misses the Bretton Woods Era?
a scammer!?
Don't worry Geo-analyst says, they will collapse any second now...honk honk!
Why did the guy delete 'A Step Back From the Brink' ...cultural genocide of islam? and why would sites on the net now have archived links that instead read 404 errors?
Return to Tiananmen the Holocausting Endings of Hong Kong?
This Is How the World Ends
https://web.archive.org/web/20180630130 … ds-part-i/
The State of the Pandemic: The United States
https://archive.fo/UlIWi
'The situation will not noticeably improve until such time as we have a widely distributed vaccine program.'
The Cutting Room Files
https://archive.fo/w1ygM
The Future of Canada
Simply put, from American point of view, the Mexican demography is the demography of the perfect partner.
Canada’s is not.
Economically, Canada isn’t a partner. It is a competitor, and that’s before one considers the Canadian tendency to subsidize industries as unrelated as dairy and aerospace and timber and electricity.
In a time when the Americans are pulling back from the global system and rewriting all their trade relationships, this alone would be cause for great concern in the Great White North. But the Canadian-American economic mismatch is only the first problem.
The second problem in Canadian-American relations is the Americans are having a change of heart about their northern neighbor not simply in economic terms, but overall.
When the Trump administration started its whole the-world-is-screwing-us-and-we’re-going-to-forcibly-renegotiate-all-trade-deals campaign, the Canadians took it as an opportunity to make demands of the United States. That clearly didn’t fit with TeamTrump’s understanding of what was supposed to be going on. Why in the world would the Canadians believe they have leverage over the government who controls the only market that matters to Canada, and global finance, energy and sea lanes to boot?
Canada’s confidence dates back to the Cold War. The flight path for the feared Soviet nuclear missile strike on the United States would have been over Canada. There was no version of American security that would not by default also guarantee Canadian security. The Canadians could have been security free-riders if they had chosen to, but to their credit they have fought and died alongside American soldiers in nearly every overseas endeavor the U.S. military has undertaken.
That does not mean the Canadians did not use their leverage, they just used it on issues of trade rather than security, leveraging their strategic position to gain concessions on market access for their products. The Canadians had a strong hand and they played it well. Repeatedly. Those trade victories were all folded into the original NAFTA accord back in the early 1990s.
It all fit with the times. The whole concept of the American-led global Order was that the Americans would create and subsidize a security and trade rubric to induce countries to join them in the fight against the Soviets. Guns-for-butter was the rule of the era. Canada’s position meant it had more to offer, and granting Ottawa some extra trade concessions for its cooperation was a price the Americans were eager to pay.
Times change.
Canadian negotiators resisted the Trump administration’s trade goals, thinking Canada’s leverage still existed.
But with the Cold War over, the Americans no longer fear Russian attack.
Canada is now just another country.
Last edited by Mars_B4_Moon (2023-03-02 09:37:30)
Offline
Technologies we could see by the year 2050
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-CUoJmNTDCs
A look at Japan’s demographic collapse, through the eyes of its youth
https://english.elpais.com/internationa … youth.html
Last edited by Mars_B4_Moon (2023-06-07 13:58:01)
Offline
Jean Raspail was probably one of the guys who predicted hordes of islamics outbreeding the French and Burning and Looting the cities of France in the French version of George Floyd riots.
LM has a happy 2050 vision
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KLBjdRKx-s
I'm not going to make a prediction
but I hope someone will have tested a Space Elevator from the Moons of Mars and maybe an Artificial Gravity Station.
that expensive SLS probably won't be around in year 2061
computer programmed personality chat-bots will over take the internet message boards, conversing and reacting to real people, as well as other chat bots.
User Clark correctly predicted a rise of 'Chatbots' and AI
Last edited by Mars_B4_Moon (2023-07-05 16:49:36)
Offline
'Visualizing the Future Global Economy by GDP in 2050'
Offline
People criticize NASA not not marking the 50th Anniversary of Apollo but what of Russia and 2007
How will Russian cultural presence in Space be in 2057 so many years after Sputnik?
A failed lunar mission dents Russian pride and reflects deeper problems with Moscow's space industry
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/failed-lunar- … 27355.html
An ambitious but failed attempt by Russia to return to the moon after nearly half a century
Offline
Saturn's moon Enceladus top target for ESA
https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration … et_for_ESA
A fresh, icy crust hides a deep, enigmatic ocean. Plumes of water burst through cracks in the ice, shooting into space. An intrepid lander collects samples and analyses them for hints of life.
ESA has started to turn this scene into a reality, devising a mission to investigate an ocean world around either Jupiter or Saturn. But which moon should we choose? What should the mission do exactly? A team of expert scientists has delivered their findings.
The mission would follow Juice, LISA and NewAthena as the first ‘large-class’ mission of Voyage 2050, ESA’s long-term plan for space science activities. Its overarching theme – ‘moons of the giant Solar System planets’ – was chosen back in 2021. To translate this theme into more concrete mission concepts, ESA selected a committee of top planetary scientists to pool their knowledge and expertise.
Offline