You are not logged in.
GUIYANG, March 4 (Xinhuanet) -- China's moon-probe program will pave the way for the country's high-tech breakthroughs and innovation and will help train a large group of top scientists, a senior space scientist said here Saturday.
Ouyang Ziyuan, an academician of Chinese Academy of Sciences and also the country's chief scientist on the moon-probe program, said at a symposium Saturday that China will benefit from its probe of the moon, particularly in the field of scientific innovation.
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2006- … 258055.htm
The moon probe demands lots of advanced technologies in the aspects of rocket communications, observing and control, remote sensing and manufacturing of lots of complicated instruments, the scientist said.
He said the research progress of the all the above mentioned technologies will also drive the development of some fundamental science research which will ultimately upgrade country's science and technology.
The Chinese launch vehicles of are much easier to follow and study than those of NASA/USA or Russia/USSR. Like the United States the USSR/Russians had a very complicated program with plans for a huge variety of rockets such as Protons, Rockot, Vostoks, Dnepr, Energia, Kosmos, Tsyklon, Molniya, Air-launch, Shtil, Zenit, Star-1, Soyuz-Fregats.....
The Long March rocket is pretty easy to follow, however the 1st LongMarch is sometimes described as 'CZ-I' because the Long-March-1 was also know as ChangZheng-1. Since then the Chinese rockets have been abbreviated both LM- and CZ in websites and textbooks.
Like the US and USSR, its space-rockets have had military implications - the Long March rocket is related to early versions of the Dongfeng ballistic missile and the DF-missile is the generic Chinese name for all of its land ICBMs. These Chinese potential as a Space power was only really first noticed after it launched the propaganda satellite 'East Is Red' back in 1970,
LM1 or CZI - in 1970 the LongMarch-1 or ChangZheng-I rocket launched its first satellite declaring "the East is Red", the LM1 could launch small payloads into LEO
LM2 or CZII - in 1975 the Chinese used the LongMarch2C or Chang Zheng-2C to launch a payload into LEO
CZIII or LM3 - in 1984 China with its ChangZheng-3 or LongMarchIII was now able to launch 1,300 Kg into GTO
LM-IV or CZ-4 - in 1988 these Chinese rockets ChangZheng-IV or LongMarch-4 were able to launch much larger payloads into orbit
All of the recent manned and unmanned-Shenzhou mission have been launch by a modified version of the early LongMarch-2 rocket family ( CZII ). The LM-2F or ChangZheng2F is the man-rated version of an earlier launcher and is now able to launch 8,000 kg into space or a spacecraft/capsule carrying two people.
China has been using LMII or CZ-2 for its manned missions, this rocket is good for manned flight to LEO but for Mars they could need something bigger - however I have also seen plans for a ChangZheng-5 and LongMarch-6 launcher.
The Chinese have declared plans for the Moon, launch of such large lunar payloads into low earth orbit would be within the capability of an upgraded version of the CZ-5 and could be available as early as 2010. During the International Astronautical Federation (IAF) annual congress in Rio de Janeiro, China unveiled deatils of its new CZ-5 heavy launch vehicle family. China hopes that the LongMarch-V rocket or CZ-5 will fulfill the requirement for large payload LEO and GEO missions for the next 20–30 years, with the first versions of the vehicle going into service by 2008. ChangZheng-5 (CZ-5, or Long March-5 in its translation) developed by China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology (CALT) is China’s next generation heavy-load launcher. They also announced plans to build a new launch pad - Hainan Spaceport will be the fourth and southernmost space center, manned grade, suited for the new CZ-5 Heavy ELV. Chief Designer for the CZ-5 was Long Lehao but a recent report says that according to Wu Yansheng at the China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology, Wu says 'capacity cannot satisfy the needs of our plans to develop a space station nor the tasks of our lunar project to land (on the moon) and return' Chang Zheng 6 is a planned next-generation Heavy ELV for lunar and deepspace trajectory injection (70 tonnes in LEO) but the CZ-5 was still awaiting final approval and would take about six years for development, being ready in 2012.
The Chinese have plans to use the Long March rockets to launch robotic craft to the Moon and launch their own space-station. A lunar landing stage developed from a Shenzhou-derived return vehicle could also be used on a one-way trip to place moon base payloads of about 11 tonnes on the lunar surface. Like the Russians and Americans the Chinese have a number of active launch pads. Taiyuan Satellite Launch Center was commissioned for sun-synchronous missions and thus supports all CZ-4 launches. TSLC is primarily used to launch meteorological satellites, earth resource satellites and scientific satellite on Long March launch vehicles. The Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center in the Gobi was China's first spaceport. The Xichang Satellite Launch Center is located in southwestern Sichuan Province, from where China launches powerful rockets and geostationary satellites. China does have plans for the Moon with the Chang'e Lunar mission and other China spacecraft. Chang'e will be an orbiter, the second stage of Moon exploration will be a soft landing on lunar surface with a rover much like the Russian Lunokhod-moonbot but with more recent technology such as NASA's Spirit and Opportunity Rovers but the Chinese Rover/Lander is still in early stage of design - Chinese organizations have showcased their prototypes and the winner will be selected through a nationwide competition. The third stage is a sample return mission such as Russia's robotic return craft or the planned NASA and ESA missions to Mars with MSR craft. A future Hainan Spaceport would be suited for the new CZ-5 Heavy ELV while the future ChangZheng-6 or LM-VI would be China's next generation Heavy ELV for lunar and deepspace trajectory or injection of 70 tonnes in LEO orbits, but we have yet to hear any news on the latest plans for CZ5.
another thread here
http://www.newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=4473
Can China go to Mars ? Dr. Zubrin will talk in August 06
http://eu.spaceref.com/news/viewsr.html?pid=19817
Transcript of Heads of Agency ISS News Conference, NASA KSC
Space technology has allowed the nation of India to move into the world of high technology, a place previously occupied only by more-developed nations. Indian launch vehicles include the Satellite Launch Vehicle (SLV), the Augmented Satellite Launch Vehicle (ASLV), the Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle (PSLV), and the Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle (GSLV). Indian cosmonaut Rakesh Sharma spent eight days in 1984 aboard the USSR's space station Salyut 7
Iran is planning to modify one of its powerful Shahab-3 ballistic missiles and use it to blast a satellite to space
South Korea decided to speed up development by joining with Russia, and cooperation began in 2004. South Korea first gained experience with missiles provided by the United States to counter North Korea. KARI is now developing the Korea Space Launch Vehicle, whose first-stage is based on the Angara rocket. First launch of the KSLV is expected in 2007. Russia is also helping to build a spaceport in Goheung County.
On the good side
Shuttle and ISS got their money, there was more money for Hubble
and CEV and the Stick appear to be doing ok.
On the very bad side :
Axed/Shutdown
- MTO is dead
- The outrigger Keck telescopes got axed
- Dawn got chopped down
On the bad side
In Danger of cutting or dealy/deferred
-TPF looks like it will be cut
-MSR looks delayed
-LISA and Constellation-X will be delayed indefinitely
-NuSTAR is in danger
-JIMO is unlikely
-Europa probe is indefinitely delayed
-TRMM & enviornmental sats are in danger
-Aeronautic designs for parachutes + Mars Airplane etc looks to be delayed
-SOFIA is held back
-Mars research has been cut by $243.3 million to $700.2 million
-SIM is in danger
-Juno is under threat
-Kepler is delayed
-SMEX might be cut
Just to put Mars in perspective for some - and some number of craft that got to Mars.
USA/NASA+JPL
The United States is the king of the red planet, although they had failures such as Mariner-3, Mars Polar Lander and the 1992-MarsObserver the USA hold the record for successful Mars missions. There have been many great missions like MGS, Mars Pathfinder, Viking 1 lander, the Viking 2 lander, the Mars Odyssey and we have the future MRO.
http://www.newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1590
Russia's partial success with the Red Planet
The Russian's had much better results with their Rovers on the Moon and Venus missions but got some fair results from Mars, most of their missions were a total failure except for MarsIII lander was a successful lander however contact was soon lost, while the Phobos-2 mission produced some good results
http://www.newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1583
The Japanese attempt
Japan's attempt with Nozomi was their big journey to the red planet, the Japan mission was scheduled to arrive at Mars on October 1999. They started ok but soon had poor results with loss of fuel, and later the JAXA/NASDA craft was cooked by solar flares, this Japanese space probe became too damaged to ever reach Mars. Japan has declared plans for a lunar base but they have no experience with manned flight.
http://www.newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1577
Europe/ESA
The European exploration of Mars can be seen with both Mars Express and the Beagle2 lander, Beagle is lost or destroyed on the red-planet and attempts to contact the lander failed. However the Mars Express Orbiter has been doing very well taking pics and confirmed the presence of water ice and carbon dioxide. Europe plans for Soyuz in Kourou and ESA have plans to explore Mars with the Aurora mission but the ESA has no experience with manned spaceflight.
http://www.newmars.com/forums/viewtopic … 69&start=0
discussion of Kliper
http://www.spacefellowship.com/Forum/vi … php?t=1551
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=38346
http://www.emoint.wbr.ru/forumall.php?i … 0&frmId=12
photos of Russia's new spacecraft
http://www.rol.ru/news/misc/spacenews/05/09/28_008.htm
http://www.tpprf.ru/ru/main/show/expo/foto/f14/
http://armsshow.itar-tass.com/?page=art … 624&cid=25
( Russian websites )
On Uranus all I know of was the past mission by Voyager 2
On Neptune see here
http://www.newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1442
Neptune Orbiter
some links, for those of you who may not have already read
Chang'e - the Chinese Moon mission
http://www.newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=4170
Robert Zubrin on the Moon & Mars
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/spacetravel-05v.html
China eyeing new HL
http://www.newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2565
I've heard some talk about how the talented Mr.Zubrin will be speaking to the Chinese on space exploration during a trip to China this year. Of course we all know the Chinese have a great history of building and invention but its potential as a Space power was only really first noticed after it launched the propaganda satellite 'East Is Red' back in 1970, these types of military/propaganda sats were common place by many during the Cold-war.
Today China has become a more free and open market, they do great trade with the USA and Europe. The Chinese have a strong economy and are now launching many foreign satellites for Australia, Brazil, the United States, ESA and the Philippines. The recent Shenzhou program has been developing for the past years, and in 2003 China became the third nation to launch a human into orbit. Shenzhou6 followed in 2005 which saw 2 more astronauts fly spending 5 days in orbit. The Chinese have plans to use the Long March rockets to launch robotic craft to the Moon and launch their own space-station. China has been using the the Long March II or CZ-2 for its manned missions, this rocket is good for manned flight to LEO but for Mars they might need something bigger - however I have also seen plans for a ChangZheng-5 and LongMarch-6 launcher.
do you think China has Mars plans ?
Here's what was up with LISA that big LaserInterferometrySpaceAntenna,
yes it looks like it will be axed
the point of LISA was not just to find gravitational waves, the whole purpose of LISA has very little to do with proving the existence of gravity waves - its real purpose is to utilize the waves to do astronomical observations , LISA would be used to look at pulsars, binary stars and blackholes
the most important year seems to be 2006 if we get past it
if they even survive NASAs 2006 Budget - so far we see NASA to pull the plug on Dawn asteroid mission, Mars research has been cut by $243.3 million to $700.2 million. This reflects the cancellation or indefinite postponement of missions such as the Mars Sample Return Mission and the Mars Telecommunications Orbiter. Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy (SOFIA) has been given no funding for the foreseeable future SOFIA (the 2.5-meter IR telescope carried on a Boeing 747) is teetering on the brink of cancellation, and the entire "Beyond Einstein" program of major cosmology and high-energy astronomy missions (staring with Constellation-X, LISA, and the Joint Dark Energy Mission) has been cancelled pending major reappraisal and another victim: Keck outrigger telescopes.
Letter from PSI Director Sykes to House Science Committee Chair Boehlert Regarding Cancellation of NASA's Dawn Mission
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewsr.html?pid=19838
I was shocked that after testifying before your Committee yesterday, the first thing Dr. Mary Cleave did upon returning to her office at NASA Headquarters was to cancel the Dawn Discovery mission. She made no mention of her intention to do this while testifying. At your meeting, missions were grouped into Flagship, medium and small, and all of your panelists accepted prioritization where they would delay or sacrifice larger missions in order to preserve basic research programs and smaller missions. In solar system exploration, Dawn is one of these small missions (the recently selected Juno mission falls into the medium category and the delayed Europa mission falls into the Flagship category). The Dawn PI, Dr. Christopher T. Russell, was notified of this action by NASA while attending his mother's funeral.
The Dawn mission was to be launched in June 2006 to rendezvous with two surviving protoplanets in the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter -the largest asteroids, Ceres and Vesta. Both objects were frozen in early stages of planet formation and evolution. Vesta accreted closer to the sun, was dry, and subsequently melted, resulting in the formation of a metallic core and basaltic volcanism on its surface. There is meteoritic evidence to suggest it's core may have produced a dynamo, like the Earth's. Ceres accreted at a greater distance from the sun and formed a rocky core with an ice rich mantle. Models suggest that Ceres may have a subsurface ocean, like Europa, which raises the question of whether life could have arisen beneath its surface.
Dawn was to be the first US science mission to use solar electric propulsion, first tested in interplanetary flight by the Deep Space 1 technology demonstration mission. Dawn represents another substantial European investment in a US solar system exploration mission. Germany is providing a double framing camera and Italy is providing a mapping spectrometer. The third instrument is a gamma- ray/neutron spectrometer provided by Los Alamos National Labs. Needless to say, the Europeans are furious with the US at this peremptory action by NASA.
Considering the concern raised at the hearing yesterday about the poor reputation of NASA as an international partner, which reflects poorly on the US, cancelling Dawn is a surprise at that level as well.
Space Adventures Ltd. said Monday it plans to develop an integrated spaceport in Singapore that will offer sub-orbital spaceflights and operate astronaut training facilities and a public education and interactive visitor center.
"Singapore is one of the best-connected countries in the world. It is home to one of the world's busiest air and sea ports. Singapore, with its superior geographical and economic infrastructure, is primed to be the hub of a new, revolutionary form of travel - in space," said Eric Anderson, president and chief executive officer of Space Adventures.
http://www.space-travel.com/reports/Spa … apore.html
The company, which arranged orbital flights for U.S. businessman Dennis Tito in April 2001, and South African Internet tycoon Mark Shuttleworth in April 2002 - both via Russian spacecraft to the International Space Station - said the focal point of Spaceport Singapore will be sub-orbital spaceflights. As the company’s Explorer spacecraft reaches its maximum altitude of 100 kilometers (64 miles), its maximum of five passengers will experience up to five minutes of continuous weightlessness.
"Countries around the world are only just realizing the enormous commercial possibilities of space tourism,” Anderson said. “The market potential for sub-orbital spaceflights alone is estimated at $1 billion annually.”
Ausonia Mensa remnant massif
http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/Mars_Expres … CIE_0.html
These images, taken by the High Resolution Stereo Camera (HRSC) on board ESA’s Mars Express spacecraft, show the Ausonia Mensa massif on Mars.
This has potential to be a fabulous method of distributing aid. High marks from me for this idea Treb. . .
With computers and the scanners, the card could be restricted to buying food, water and the like.
Katrina's searing images -- linking nature's wrath and the nation's wrongs -- have fanned the smoldering resentments of the civil rights, Reaganomics and hip-hop eras all at once. Once a Presidential Disaster Declaration has been made, the Federal Emergency Management Agency assumes the role of coordinating federal agency support to meet state requests for assistance.
Report Slams Katrina Disaster Preparation
The deaths and suffering of thousands of Hurricane Katrina's victims might have been avoided if the government had heeded lessons from the 2001 terror attacks and taken a proactive stance toward disaster preparedness, a House inquiry concludes.
But from President Bush on down to local officials there was largely a reactive posture to the catastrophic Aug. 29 storm — even when faced with early warnings about its deadly potential.
http://soundroots.org/uploaded_images/b … 779638.jpg
A 520-page report, titled "A Failure of Initiative," was being released Wednesday as
Homeland Security Secretary
Michael Chertoff testifies before a Senate committee conducting a separate investigation of the government's Katrina response.
The Associated Press obtained a copy of the report Tuesday night.
"The preparation for and response to Hurricane Katrina should disturb all Americans," said the report, written by a Republican-dominated special House committee chaired by Rep. Tom Davis, R-Va.
http://soundroots.org/uploaded_images/b … 779638.jpg
"Passivity did the most damage," it said. "The failure of initiative cost lives, prolonged suffering, and left all Americans justifiably concerned our government is no better prepared to protect its people than it was before 9/11, even if we are."
The hard-hitting findings allocated blame to state and local authorities and concluded that the federal government's single largest failure was in not recognizing Katrina's likely consequences as it approached. That could have prompted a mobilization of federal assets for a post-storm evacuation of a flooded New Orleans, the report said, meaning aid "would have arrived several days earlier."
It also found that Bush could have speeded the response by becoming involved in the crisis earlier and says he was not receiving guidance from a disaster specialist who would have understood the scope of the storm's destruction.
a bit more
http://www.flug-revue.rotor.com/FRheft/ … R0411f.htm
http://www.universetoday.com/am/publish … ml?2632004
ESA and it's Cargo Ship
*Dark-side Saturn and Rings. Thanks Cassini; if not for you we'd never have seen this.
--Cindy
what a great photo !
MSL looks ok now, but it might face a tight budget
http://www.newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=4056
Even planetary exploration's job-one that has seen the Martian landscape increasingly covered with rover tracks was also not immune to NASA's budget chops : NASA's Red Planet research budget has been cut by a few hundred million. This includes the cancellation MSR Mission and the Mars Telecommunications Orbiter ? The CEV/CLV budget is getting damn near close to the massive Shuttle budget. Cancelled/Delayed indefinitely - Mars research has been cut by $243.3 million to $700.2 million. This reflects the cancellation or indefinite postponement of missions such as the Mars Sample Return Mission and the MTO
Not cut down but Delayed indefinitely - the Terrestrial Planet Finder (TPF)
Article on the web
NASA Postpones Or Kills Several Major Projects
Most salient among the robotic mission cuts is the Europa exploration program that had been given the highest priority solar system science objective after Mars by the National Academy of Sciences and NASA advisory committees. And even planetary exploration's job-one that has seen the Martian landscape increasingly covered with rover tracks was also not immune: NASA's Red Planet research budget has been cut by $243.3 million to $700.2 million. This includes the cancellation or indefinite postponement of projects such as the Mars Sample Return Mission and the Mars Telecommunications Orbiter.
http://blog.sciam.com/index.php?title=p … &tb=1&pb=1
Not only did planetary geology pay, but so did astronomy: Also delayed indefinitely was the Terrestrial Planet Finder (TPF) slated to detect and study Earth-like planets
http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/NASA_ … jects.html
Responding to the announced indefinite postponement of TPF, the Planetary Society released a statement Monday saying the agency's budget "seriously damages the hugely productive and successful robotic exploration of our solar system and beyond." In addition, the statement said, NASA's budget "slashes funding for the fundamental space science that makes such missions possible and turns raw data into discoveries."
Outrageous attacks on NASA's science, George Deutsch the NASA public affairs guy has resigned his post at NASA, the Bush government is using its religion and influencing climate change studies and scientific results.
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/ame … 344220.ece
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/space/3644847.html
NASA's public-man who lacked degree resigns, there are also articles on the NASA scientists who were gagged by the government about reports on greenhouse gasses and global warming. The Bush man Deutsch, the whitehouse presidential appointee in NASA headquarters, had told a Website designers to add the word 'theory' after every mention of the Big Bang
NASA’s assault on the moon will start with survey of landing sites
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/11238355/
LRO is the first of the Robotic Lunar Exploration Program missions. After a planned launch by late fall in 2008, LRO will take four days to make its way to the moon and then orbit that chunk of "magnificent desolation" for nominally one year.
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) is a measurement-driven lunar orbiter mission, which will map the moon and measure the radiation levels. This is the 1st Moon mission from NASA’s New moon/mars Vision for Space Exploration, this could be launched 2008 by the Delta Rocket from Kennedy Space Center Florida. Will lower Lunar Recon Orbitor expectations of high tech instrumentation and could introduce delay in the 2008 launching.
http://www.aerospaceguide.net/lunar.html
http://www.newscientistspace.com/article.ns?id=dn8683
many researchers argue that the polar regions should be the top priority. A number of current and planned international lunar orbiting missions will help fill the knowledge gaps. NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, planned for launch in late 2008, aims to identify resources around the Moon that later missions might investigate.
old news item
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/china-04zq.html
http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/space/11/2 … p/?1122003
are they preparing for a manned mission ?
very nice website