Genetics

Void · 2025-06-25 12:37:52

The plot thickens..... https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technolo … r-AA1Hptf5 Quote:

Ancient DNA Reveals Mysterious New Group of Humans in Colombia With No Genetic Ties to People Today
Story by Margherita Bassi • 1h •
3 min read

Not related to "Native Americans?".

Interesting

Ending Pending

Last edited by Void (2025-06-25 12:41:09)

Void · 2025-07-15 13:56:47

I have encountered something that interests me about Neanderthals: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … ORM=VRDGAR
Quote:

Scientists Injected 40,000-Year-Old Human DNA into Mice What Emerged Has Left Everyone Speechless
YouTube
Awesome!

This could be important for the future of a space faring human race: https://nationalpost.com/news/world/nea … ntists-say Quote:

Reddit
X
Share on Linkedin
Open more share options
Neanderthals may have hibernated for months during harsh winters, scientists say
Scientists compared the bones found at the site with those of other animals that hibernate and found the same lesions and signs of damage in both
Author of the article:By Jelena Maric
Published Dec 21, 2020
2 minute read
8 Comments

If the genes to accomplish something like hibernation could be discovered from the genes of Neanderthals or Denisovans, it may be of use to future humans, I feel.

I suppose that first you might want to find out what genes allow some animals to hibernate or go into a torpor, and see, if anything similar existed in any ancient humans. (Neanderthals or Denisovans).

I think that it has been a situation of overcoming mistakes from arrogance, that has cast a darker view on ancient human types. Physical Fitness glorified in our culture is rather narcissistic as far as I am concerned and misplaced anyway. So, I do not regard the so-called archaic body types as being inferior.

It really is not right to call modern humans in Europe "Homo-Sapiens", in the same sense as "Homo-Sapiens" would have been prior to mixing with the so called "Archaic" types.

In order for modern societies to pander to elites of various kinds, idiotic tests are applied. The modern school system, at least in America supports idiot thinking, as this is to make common people useful idiots.

In a similar way, nature not particularly valuing intelligence, may not have applied the better tests to the human race but may have provided for less than what might have been possible.

The sad truth is that if there were two types of humans who would respond to stress in different ways:
1) Hibernate, or Torpor, or Estivate.
2) Cannibalism.

The Homo Sapiens could have caught the Neanderthals or Denisovans off guard and eaten them.

This test would be idiotic for the sake of the human race, but certainly it would be the survival of the fittest.

It is too easy for the fittest to be the most idiotic.

I think that is the sad truth of domination as the method of testing. It is essentially Satanic in nature.

But it is possible that things might be regained which have been lost.

I think that the Cave Bears also probably became lunch due to human appetite.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cave_bear

Ending Pending

Last edited by Void (2025-07-15 14:21:21)

Void · 2025-08-05 19:11:57

This is of great interest: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technolo … jg#image=1 Quote:

Scientists say human DNA is hiding a ‘super power’ we could unlock
©Metro
Professor Chris Gregg, senior author on the study, said: ‘There’s potentially an opportunity—by understanding these hibernation-linked mechanisms in the genome—to find strategies to intervene and help with age-related diseases. If that’s hidden in the genome that we’ve already got, we could learn from hibernators to improve our own health’ (Picture: Getty)

Some have speculated that the Neanderthals may have hibernated. I also if some form of Homo Erectus might have first developed that ability, since they were in Eurasia for some long time.

But it is also possible that some precursor to humans may have developed that skill a very long time ago.

Interesting to think that humans may retain the building blocks for it.

It could be very important for space travel in the future, if it can be revived in any form.

Ending Pending

Last edited by Void (2025-08-05 19:18:18)

Void · 2025-09-19 07:33:31

https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … &FORM=VIRE Quote:

Bret Weinstein Exposes the Dark Side of Your Genetic Programming
YouTube
Dad Saves America
51 views

Perhaps questions about gender xenophobia may produce a useful understanding.

The portion of the female population that cannot with any amount of material goods be satisfied. I like most people and society understand much more about the selfishness of men. But is a non-war situation ideal for the genes of most of the females? Or do they want to mate with the most bear-like men they can be conquered by.

Evidence is that there has been greater genetic pressure on the Male than the Female.

This is only one small facet on a complex structure, I think, but it seems to be one that is in a triggered status.

The aggravation produced, is being mirrored now by some of the male population.

The NAZI felt that causing groups to hate and kill each other would weed out the weaklings and produce a better human. I think that only has some value, and likely not for modern humans. It is more likely in my opinion to produce a fall in the quality of men and humans in general. Having achieved civilization, some people do not find prosperity to be sufficient. Rather, they emotionally "Think" to kill others and edit other kinds from the gene pool and take wealth from the killed.

Rape is disgusting to me, but a fact exists that a male that could do it has to be stronger than the woman or group of people who resist it. I suspect that a certain number of women or groups with women in them, want a worthy partner, emotionally. Ideally this kind of a woman can control an almost uncontrollable male. A beast of burden, that is strong, but can be controlled sufficiently that her offspring will have the advantage of consuming the materials that the male takes from other people while perhaps even killing them.

Getting better genes by excluding "Bad" genes, really is not in our interest now, not by the stimulation of violence as a method of selection. I think that this is how civilizations fall. It is simply entertaining to those who are happy to eliminate the competition rather than to cooperate to a civilized purpose.

Having said that, I want to be sure that it is said that I think that quite a lot of females can overcome this desire to promote hate in society. It is not evil to be one gender or the other. It is just that not all players on the field, consider their lot to be just payment to them. They feel they were born here and are entitled to push their demands to the limit.

So, they will not do Ozzy and Hariet.

As a resentful male, I have to confess to an emotion, of watching this emotional effort to push society into a stone age blood bath to a large degree end in their self-removal from the contest. The gender hate is one of the most despicable things that we will have witnessed in our lifetimes. But no that does not justify male errors, not at all. The Chads and Tyrones are among the turncoat perpetrators. Having the arrogance to believe that they are quite worthy of excessive replication, even if they really don't bring much to the table other than Stone Age skills.

Ending Pending

Last edited by Void (2025-09-19 07:54:03)

Void · 2025-09-29 03:21:44

Let's consider this to be an unpleasant medicine, but perhaps required at this point in the decay of our cultures: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-ACTKA8NZQ Quote:

How Does the Female Brain Work? How Do Women Think and Reason?
PsycheDepth

Some of this I have figured out on my own. But don't get me wrong, I am not so much seeking a victory of some kind, I am old and just not interesting to those who may care and myself not so interested anyway. The idiotic conspiracy between governing powers and the female population is just a bit annoying.

I now understand fully that public school was designed to make me a useful victim. Thankfully in old age, I can understand that it no longer owns my soul.

A shame of our current situation is that I think that some of the ruling classes don't care if they run the system into the ground. And some foreign entities have cracked our code and are collaborating with those in our ruling classes who do not care if our culture is destroyed.

It is said that a crowd of idiots is an idiot, and a crowd of geniuses is also an idiot. So, the crowd of either gender is an idiot, I suspect as well. Not necessarily idiotic in the same ways, but idiotic. And then when the entire collection of humans becomes a reactive crowd you may get an uber idiot.

But I do agree that if females have what they seem to actually want, then only stone age attributes will be retained. If males have what they seem to actually want too many stone age attributes will be exchanged for a kindergarten reality. No need to be conscious, and no need to be robust.

Look upon the cultures of the world where in "Reality" one of the genders has the upper hand over many generations. I suspect that you will find excessive robustness or excessive gracile dominance. My idea is that there is a "Sweet Spot" that sometimes human cultures achieve. Without that failure is definitely an option.

I guess the less I say, the less I poison what is in the video.

So, I will stop.

Ending Pending

Last edited by Void (2025-09-29 03:34:39)

offtherock · 2025-09-29 15:04:06

I think many here would like to read the book "The Selfish Gene" by Richard Dawkins.
Its very good and about exactly this.

Variety is needed for you never know what the future holds.
And even though we may feel we understand the world, we usually don´t.
Just ask the dinosaurs.

One very interesting thing.
From googling "brain size 40000 years ago".
"Evidence suggests that the average brain volume of Homo sapiens has actually decreased by roughly 10% over the past 40,000 years, a reversal of the earlier trend of brain expansion".

I think the moment we form civilizations, being intelligent becomes largely a burden.
You usually don´t want to be smart within the society.
You want to be obedient and fit in.
And never have your own thought about anything.

Last edited by offtherock (2025-09-29 15:04:58)

Void · 2025-09-29 19:52:31

I think that your words represent a set of valid measurements offtherock.

The question of smart must be answered by another human who may suggest that they are smart enough to measure another human being.

Now I am not wanting to suggest that I have all the mental assets that I wish I did, far from it. I am just happy if I discover that I have anything at all that may be of worth in that regard.

I grew up in a place where there were almost any ethnic group of Europe that you could imagine. And so called "Native Americans" as well.

At this point I don't particularly fault any of them for being bad, they do have some general differences, but they are all just trying to make something work. So, I want to make sure it is understood that I do not hate a particular religious group. At least as long as they are not involved in underhanded things. But I am at peace with all who I grew up with.

A story: A student kept harassing a teacher in a class, and said, how come people from my group have better grades than the other people?
The teacher resisted for quite some time, but upon becoming exasperated finally said "Because if I don't give you good grades, you parents will have me fired".

Well now then we may understand that intelligent might be defined by those who want to advertise their talents as the most important.

That is just a part of the puzzle though. There are so many things.

As for the Small Brains, they will tell you many things. The brains became more efficient. Tall people are more intelligent because they can have bigger brains. (Presumably their bigger brains are also claimed to be more efficient).

But the small brain has been associated with poor diets. That is agriculture, did not provide the same nutrients as Hunter Gatherer food, and was to some degree toxic. But it did allow hierarchy, and finally writing. Writing leads to libraries and evil librarians as well.

So, the super intelligent big brained Hunter Gatherers invented farming, and civilization and writing.

Then specialization occurred. A slow-moving hive mind of people rather than highly autonomous big, brained people. Specialists.

The priests could calculate the seasons and tell the surfs when to plant what. The surfs were experts at using s stick to plant crops.
The Pharoh banged his sister or mother and produced (Oops!). But being a deformed god-king, it was only appropriate that you should be able to grab anything you wanted. Perhaps not from the priests as much not directly.

So, if you are an inventor, and accumulate wealth from it pretty soon you are robbed and dead and perhaps the nobles are banging your women who have become low level servants.

So, yes stupid emerges from the most honored. And you better honor them or you are next.

The importance of wilderness is a template where nature will favor intelligence. Opportunities and problems to solve in order to survive gives you a large autonomous brain and if you can get yourself some leisure time, then you might reuse your large brain to think beyond just material needs.

There are other things to talk about in this regard, but the above is quite a lot.

Ending Pending

Oh there is one recent thing. Speculation that interbreeding with Neanderthals may have slowed down human evolution. Probably this is from the people with "Small Efficient Brains", and maybe they are tall with "Small Efficient Brains as well".

You see the problem is that they always have a need to be at the center of an ego they want to honor. It could never be that they the examiners may be examining things that may have been better in some ways then those who examine.

They seldom fail to do this.

Ending Pending

Last edited by Void (2025-09-29 20:38:29)

Void · Today 10:47:52

I will give comments to this later: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technolo … r-AA1NAVmh

Quote:

Archaeological evidence suggests that if Neanderthals were alive, they could outfight, outlift, and outlive everyone today.
Story by Peter Kinney • 3w •
5 min read

Pause..............

In my opinion the problem with the Neanderthals came from the egos of the discoverers of the bones, and that accident that the first discovery as of an individual in very poor health.

You need to understand that Industry was frowned on by the landed gentry. You either owned an estate, or you were a servant. People who worked with Coal and things related to it were dirty and worked with their hands, not their mouths.

In my opinion, ego told them that they had to be the flower of times flow, and what was before had to be inferior.

It also has helped to imagine that the human race originated in Africa but in Europe became much more evolved. So much better than the darkies. Neanderthals had to somehow be assigned to a lesser position. Asians have had this treatment as well historically.

Don't get me wrong I appreciate what Europeans are. They are well developed in some ways, but others are well developed in other ways.

Ending Pending

Last edited by Void (Today 11:18:16)

Void · Today 11:19:45

And now I can speak of a problem. In the prior post, Neanderthals get some appreciation.

What I say now is my opinion. Not proven but suspected.

It annoys me that I watch so much stumbling.

As I see it, the average Male, desires these attributes in a woman.
1) Juvenile Characteristics. (Higher voice than Men, more like a child, less body hair, smaller body but larger head). This as everyone knows can lead to a bad thing, I do not have to name. But it is good, if the male has these other traits. (Head Hair is sometimes used to simulate larger head size).
2) The ability to give birth to children. (Breasts, hips). (Girls often die if they get pregnant).
3) A helpmate. (Someone to help with the work this is in contrast to #1).
*Some men become imprinted to become homosexual or bisexual. I am not sure if it is childhood exposure to male imprinting or genetic).

So, what do women want?
1) Helpmate. Her upper mind wants someone who she can convince to be helpful to her needs. This is what she says she wants. And so Cucks and Betas are very welcome.
What do her genes want?
2) Killer Animal. Her lower brain wants something that will grab stuff from other people so that her offspring can prosper.
*The proper mix of #1 and #2, can win her children survival.
*You won't like this but I suspect that the current female allergy to men is possibly similar to how other allergies emerge. Perhaps lack of proper exposure to Men and Boys. Also, since they can "Cuck" the government. they don't have to negotiate nicely for #1. They can just concentrate on #2.

So, in my opinion the two balance each other, but the Male desire may lead to bigger brain size. The female desire may lead to bigger body size. Process control. We hope that the set point is set properly.

Neanderthals might have been better in some ways but could not deal with the so-called modern peoples improper unstable mating instincts.

You don't need men 12 feet tall. You don't need bigger. You need sufficient.

Ending Pending

Last edited by Void (Today 14:47:56)

Void · Today 14:29:33

I would recommend that if you view this you look back at the two previous posts: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rh-VbA5nKWE
Quote:

3-Million-Year-Old Pelvis Reveals Evolution’s Impact on Childbirth | BBC Timestamp
BBC Timestamp

This regulatory circumstance required the expansion of the pelvis, particularly birth, but limited brain size. Male preference desired the expansion of the pelvis. Females should have preferred it as well, but too big a head and too much trouble in birth, I suppose.

From post #109: Quote:

As I see it, the average Male, desires these attributes in a woman.
1) Juvenile Characteristics. (Higher voice than Men, more like a child, less body hair, smaller body but larger head). This as everyone knows can lead to a bad thing, I do not have to name. But it is good, if the male has these other traits. (Head Hair is sometimes used to simulate larger head size).
2) The ability to give birth to children. (Breasts, hips). (Girls often die if they get pregnant).
3) A helpmate. (Someone to help with the work this is in contrast to #1).
*Some men become imprinted to become homosexual or bisexual. I am not sure if it is childhood exposure to male imprinting or genetic).

Per #2, a male preference for a larger pelvis, being instinctive most likely it is a good selection if he is to be a father. Per the Breasts it is usually an exaggeration on the part of the female (Involuntary) but indicates that she could nurse the children.

The modern social instruction to hate men for valuing the items of #2, is actually quite criminal and should be condemned. The male is doing exactly what evolution has programmed.

About big hair and obesity. The male desire for a large brain (Head) in relation to body size relates to big hair which is like breasts which exaggerate the large head feature, and obesity, is against the attractiveness of the female as the body size expands more than the head size.

The idea that females are not to assist in home making is an action against #3.

This looks like some sort of social interference from a power that does not like our people at all. I am tempted to say Marxists, but it could be the Elites as well. Maybe both.

Things people may not like but I think may well be generally true.

My mind is sometimes compartmentalized. I think there is a good reason why we want the problem of the pelvis being too small for large heads, but at this time I am not able to access that information. I had it before though.

It is possible that it imposes the necessity of brain efficiency. Not sure.

Anyway, I will not live so much to see, when people are grown in incubators, and that cybernetic attachments will be placed in their brains.

Then then can have very big and efficient brains.

But I am pretty sure I will be quite dead by then. So, not my problem, if that is a problem. Ha Ha!

Ending Pending

Last edited by Void (Today 14:47:32)

New Mars Forums

Announcement

#101 2025-06-25 12:37:52

Re: Genetics

#102 2025-07-15 13:56:47

Re: Genetics

#103 2025-08-05 19:11:57

Re: Genetics

#104 2025-09-19 07:33:31

Re: Genetics

#105 2025-09-29 03:21:44

Re: Genetics

#106 2025-09-29 15:04:06

Re: Genetics

#107 2025-09-29 19:52:31

Re: Genetics

#108 Today 10:47:52

Re: Genetics

#109 Today 11:19:45

Re: Genetics

#110 Today 14:29:33

Re: Genetics

Board footer