Debug: Database connection successful
You are not logged in.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7G_ChY0Tsxw
This is a really excellent video which I think makes a lot of sense of current developments. I like it not least because I think it backs up my optimistic take on BFR development which has been subject to some criticism here! lol
Last edited by louis (2018-04-22 05:23:00)
Let's Go to Mars...Google on: Fast Track to Mars blogspot.com
Offline
Like button can go here
Has Musk ever hit his initial stated timeline? Mid to late 2030, at the earliest.
Offline
Like button can go here
Totally irrelevant.
Like asking "Did Bell hit a few problems along the way? ", "Did Edison experience a few difficulties before he achieved major success?" or "Did Archimedes ever feel he wouldn't amount to much? "
See the video I posted about BFR development. They are a lot closer than you think.
Has Musk ever hit his initial stated timeline? Mid to late 2030, at the earliest.
Let's Go to Mars...Google on: Fast Track to Mars blogspot.com
Offline
Like button can go here
I paid you the respect of viewing the video before posting.
Your analysis is shallow.
Offline
Like button can go here
Some of the commentary is also inaccurate; the Raptor engine isn't to the production stage yet, and they need 42 of them. I would be surprised and pleased to see a BFS "Grasshopper" fly sometime in 2019. Ditto, the first Falcon 2 test flight and the launch abort flight.
And yes, I too, watched the video first before commenting.
Last edited by Oldfart1939 (2018-04-21 22:04:25)
Offline
Like button can go here
Elon Musk mentioned Falcon Heavy in a news conference in September 2005. First test flight was 2018, and hasn't launched payload yet. MCT/ITS was announced at IAC in September 2016. So should we expect BFR to fly 2029?
Offline
Like button can go here
There's no comparison. Space X was founded only in 2002. Space X had started from scratch. Musk may have indulged in some wild optimism in 2005 re the Falcon 9 Heavy but now we are in a different place. As the video makes clear, Space X are already well advanced on the engine testing, the propellant tank, and the machine tool for the body. Furthermore they now have a wealth of experience in rocket design which they didn't have in 2005. A 2022 cargo launch to Mars is clearly very ambitious and could be derailed if anything does not proceed as planned. However, I think the chances of them missing a 2024 date for that cargo launch are much more remote.
Elon Musk mentioned Falcon Heavy in a news conference in September 2005. First test flight was 2018, and hasn't launched payload yet. MCT/ITS was announced at IAC in September 2016. So should we expect BFR to fly 2029?
Let's Go to Mars...Google on: Fast Track to Mars blogspot.com
Offline
Like button can go here
See above - I think it's shallow to simply say "he's missed previous target deadlines by a mile so he will miss this one by a mile".
As the video makes clear, work on the BFR is already well advanced.
I paid you the respect of viewing the video before posting.
Your analysis is shallow.
Let's Go to Mars...Google on: Fast Track to Mars blogspot.com
Offline
Like button can go here
Louis, it is still my intention to very much limit my activity in most threads on this site. Still thanks for the video. I watched it, and then a second video about blue origins came on. I am going to discuss both in General System.
Void
End
Offline
Like button can go here
I look forward to the very unlikely event of being wrong.
Offline
Like button can go here
Most activity of space build from near scratch design takes about 6 years to get to a launch so I see no reason not to feel that the Space x timeline is being compressed to get to the launch target. Money and brute force can only go so far towards being successful for each launch.
Offline
Like button can go here
louis, watch Starlink. That is the long term funding source for the BFR, which means it is more likely to dictate timelines for BFR.
Offline
Like button can go here
Starlink will certainly be a potential source of funding for longer term Mars colonisation. But I don't think Mission One is dependent on it. For one thing, major sponsorship will be available for Mission One.
louis, watch Starlink. That is the long term funding source for the BFR, which means it is more likely to dictate timelines for BFR.
Let's Go to Mars...Google on: Fast Track to Mars blogspot.com
Offline
Like button can go here
Looks like Space X might get government funding for the BFR (from the USAF).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_3Vl78FY_3A
louis, watch Starlink. That is the long term funding source for the BFR, which means it is more likely to dictate timelines for BFR.
Let's Go to Mars...Google on: Fast Track to Mars blogspot.com
Offline
Like button can go here