New Mars Forums

Official discussion forum of The Mars Society and MarsNews.com

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Announcement: As a reader of NewMars forum, we have opportunities for you to assist with technical discussions in several initiatives underway. NewMars needs volunteers with appropriate education, skills, talent, motivation and generosity of spirit as a highly valued member. Write to newmarsmember * gmail.com to tell us about your ability's to help contribute to NewMars and become a registered member.

#26 2017-04-15 17:42:34

louis
Member
From: UK
Registered: 2008-03-24
Posts: 7,208

Re: What Are The Best Settlement Sites on Mars?

With the Chryse Planitia you're within striking distance.   You're away from good iron ore, water and PV territory if you head for VM first off.

I'd like to clear a "road" south from Chryse towards VM. 

Tom Kalbfus wrote:

How about sending some bouncers to the Marineris Valles? If they survive, they can survey the landing terrain and guide in further landers to a pin point precision landing. Now need for boring flat landscapes! The most interesting thing on Mars is the Marineris Valles, so lets go there!


Let's Go to Mars...Google on: Fast Track to Mars blogspot.com

Offline

#27 2017-04-15 18:07:14

Dook
Banned
From: USA
Registered: 2004-01-09
Posts: 1,409

Re: What Are The Best Settlement Sites on Mars?

louis wrote:

The Viking Lander site is fine.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viking_1

Those rocks don't look too big.  Better that then something that looks smooth but turns out to be less than solid.

As the MIT Paper specifies, 10,000 sq metres of ultra light PV panelling is not ridiculous. It's 100 metres by 100 metres and can be laid down in 17 hours. 




Dook wrote:
louis wrote:

Dook -

From the MIT Team's evaluation of the best latitude for PV systems:

"The results show that there is an optimum location for solar architectures around 30 degrees north latitude. The results also show that northern latitudes are always better then their southern counterparts."

http://systemarchitect.mit.edu/docs/cooper10.pdf

So for me, favouring PV, that would push it a little further north of the Viking 1/Pathfinder landing sites.


31 degrees north of the equator is the best spot for solar panels on Mars?  Okay, fine, sounds like that's where the settlement needs to be then for solar panel power making and for heating. 

This study suggests a 100 kw solar panel farm, that's tens of thousands of panels.  That's absolutely ridiculous.   

Can't land anywhere close to where Viking 1 is.  Have you seen the pictures?  You can't land in a rock field.

What size do these rolls of thin PV roll up into?   

I looked at Viking 2 pictures.  The Viking 1 landing site is probably okay.

Offline

#28 2017-04-16 03:10:42

louis
Member
From: UK
Registered: 2008-03-24
Posts: 7,208

Re: What Are The Best Settlement Sites on Mars?

The ultra-light arrays have efficiencies of 15% and a mass/area of 0.063kg/m2! So for 10,000 sq. metres that's 630kg.  I am guessing you can probably fit that into a couple of cubic metres, but with protection and roll out mechanism...perhaps they are talking about three  cubic metres? 


Dook wrote:
louis wrote:

The Viking Lander site is fine.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viking_1

Those rocks don't look too big.  Better that then something that looks smooth but turns out to be less than solid.

As the MIT Paper specifies, 10,000 sq metres of ultra light PV panelling is not ridiculous. It's 100 metres by 100 metres and can be laid down in 17 hours. 




Dook wrote:

31 degrees north of the equator is the best spot for solar panels on Mars?  Okay, fine, sounds like that's where the settlement needs to be then for solar panel power making and for heating. 

This study suggests a 100 kw solar panel farm, that's tens of thousands of panels.  That's absolutely ridiculous.   

Can't land anywhere close to where Viking 1 is.  Have you seen the pictures?  You can't land in a rock field.

What size do these rolls of thin PV roll up into?   

I looked at Viking 2 pictures.  The Viking 1 landing site is probably okay.


Let's Go to Mars...Google on: Fast Track to Mars blogspot.com

Offline

#29 2017-04-16 17:35:27

3015
Member
Registered: 2017-01-08
Posts: 30

Re: What Are The Best Settlement Sites on Mars?

Louis, the panels described in the paper are very light but they don't pack densely. The paper cited in the one you linked (with the 0.063 kg/m^2 panels) lists a volume of 0.055 m^3 per 35.3 m^2 of panel area. So for 10,000 m^2 of panels the volume would be 15.6 m^3.

Last edited by 3015 (2017-04-16 17:37:37)

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB