You are not logged in.
For kbd512 re #350
Thank you for the reminder of the need to compare Apples to Apples.
I am calling for real numbers instead of hand waving in this forum.
The method reported for production of some result using a molecular jiggling method is one thing.
A method that produces the same exact result using another method can be compared to the first one.
Each method will have advantages and disadvantages.
One method will consume less energy than the other to produce a kilogram of product.
It seems possible to me that this forum is capable of placing into the public record information that is precise and actionable.
Update: I just renamed a topic in hopes our members will help to build up a collection of knowledge about CO2 in the Mars context.
https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=10930
If you have time, please create posts that contains all the information a person or group would need to implement one of the methods to work with CO2. Please keep each post tightly focused so that the reader can concentrate on one particular idea.
The jiggly method discovered by the folks at the university in South Wales might turn into an entire industry.
There are already entire industries developed or developing around carbon capture.
There are entire industries developed or developing around using pure carbon.
The NewMars environment can draw upon all existing resources and blend them into something a reader can use to solve a problem or create an entire infrastructure on Mars.
(th)
Offline
Like button can go here