You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
This topic is available for any NewMars member who might wish to call attention to a particular post of kbd512.
I'd like to lead off this new topic with a highlight of the post of 2021/12/10, offering perspective on the unique place of Elon Musk in the history of Earth.
http://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php … 57#p188557
(th)
Offline
Indeed, yes. One of our greatest contributors and one that I have learned much from.
"Plan and prepare for every possibility, and you will never act. It is nobler to have courage as we stumble into half the things we fear than to analyse every possible obstacle and begin nothing. Great things are achieved by embracing great dangers."
Offline
This is as good as we can do for the Thumbs up to post made....
Offline
Thumbs up for the http://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php … 13#p188613 logistics of build and launch site considerations when getting approval from the US alphabet soup of agencies.
Offline
Thumbs up for http://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php … 90#p188890 by kbd512 on the benefits of cultured meat.
(th)
Offline
solar reality post
https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 44#p189144
you need way more panels than what the business are selling you as they are not compensating for application
Offline
kbd512 is famous (in NewMars circles) for long, detailed, often emphatic posts. Often these are worth bookmarking for their value for reference.
However, in the post below, kbd512 has set a new record in the opposite direction ...
For sheer punch, with the smallest possible number of words, I hereby nominate:
http://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php … 80#p190680
(th)
Offline
tahanson43206,
Well, there wasn't much more to be said about that topic. If you want to know the outcome then you have to do the actual experiment, not some petri dish version of it. I'm reasonably sure that all adults know how and don't require any government oversight. First figure out if there's an actual problem before worrying about how to "solve it". The absolute best way to resolve that question is to have a child on the moon or Mars. If the child is healthy, then it doesn't matter in the slightest what medical scientists think about that.
If social and hard sciences want to improve outcomes for humanity, then they can cease and desist with their idiotic and self-destructive practice of inculcating anti-social personality traits in children, and stop inviting anti-humanists / nihilists / communists into their "science programs". The fake outrage / fake science / real misogyny / real misandry / real nihilism / real anti-humanism are incalculably greater threats to humanity's continued existence, both here on Earth and anywhere else we choose to go, than bearing a child under gravitational conditions of less than 9.8 meters per second per second. Science can't solve social issues, because science can only ever tell us "what is", never how to apply "what is" in a way that's useful to the individual / society / humanity writ large.
Offline
I happened on the post of automobile survival kit prep which applies other more but its a well put together list.
Offline
1. i personally respect kbd
2. this is fuc&king stupid
Offline
Agreed post #8. Eventually, children will be born in low G environments, assuming we ever get that far. We will then have first hand information on how it effects fetal and postnatal development. I cannot see it being catastrophic in the case of Mars. The problem is that people naturally tend to lose calcium and develop bone porosity problems as they age. If they start out with lower density bones due to lower G, then osteoporosis may be an even bigger health problem on Mars than it is on Earth.
"Plan and prepare for every possibility, and you will never act. It is nobler to have courage as we stumble into half the things we fear than to analyse every possible obstacle and begin nothing. Great things are achieved by embracing great dangers."
Offline
Osteoporosis as an issue in zero G has, from everything I have read, been resolved through a combination of space medicine, "vacuum trousers" and exercise regimes Presumably with 0.38 G on Mars it will be even less of a problem there. I think the foetal development issues are far more complex. There has been evidence of foetal damage, probably relating to embryonic parts being unable to orientate themselves in Zero G but again, it might be that 0.38 G is sufficient to overcome that. I have suggested before that it might become established practice for first trimester women to conceive in orbital 1G and stay up there for 3 months, as it is likely the earlier development stages are the most vulnerable.
Agreed post #8. Eventually, children will be born in low G environments, assuming we ever get that far. We will then have first hand information on how it effects fetal and postnatal development. I cannot see it being catastrophic in the case of Mars. The problem is that people naturally tend to lose calcium and develop bone porosity problems as they age. If they start out with lower density bones due to lower G, then osteoporosis may be an even bigger health problem on Mars than it is on Earth.
Let's Go to Mars...Google on: Fast Track to Mars blogspot.com
Offline
SearchTerm:gasoline solar manufacture of
http://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php … 96#p203696
In the post at the link above, kbd512 summarizes earlier more detailed posts.
Estimates of costs and income are provided.
Google came up with these snippets, when asked to find projects that cost $250 billion
Why China is investing $250 billion in Latin America
www.washingtonpost.com › news › monkey-cage › 2015/02/04 › why-chi...
Feb 4, 2015 · Most recently, China pledged to invest $250 billion in the region over the next 10 years. But why has China decided to make such a sizable ...Apple is America's richest company that isn't a bank, with ... - Vox
www.vox.com › new-money › apple-250-billion-cashMay 2, 2017 · In addition to its $250 billion in cash on hand, Apple is earning around $4 billion per month in profits.
ESG index funds hit $250 billion as US investor role in boom grows
www.cnbc.com › 2020/09/02 › esg-index-funds-hit-250-billion-as-us-inve...Sep 2, 2020 · Impact investing index funds have topped $250 billion, and the U.S. market is ... For example, the Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund
$250 billion in 'rebalancing' inflows could rescue stocks by the end ...
www.marketwatch.com › Markets › The TellMay 28, 2022 · Buying from mutual funds, pension funds and sovereign wealth funds is overdue, the bank's strategists say.
U.S. Investing $250 Billion in Banks - The New York Times
www.nytimes.com › Business › EconomyOct 13, 2008 · Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. told nine leading bankers they would have to accept government investment for the good of the U.S. ...
Annual Return on Investment Calculator | Ameriprise Financial
www.ameriprise.com › financial-news-research › investment-return-calcula...This investment returns calculator can help you estimate annual gains. Learn if you're on track to meet your long-term goals.
Watch This Is What $250 Billion Actually Looks Like - WIRED
www.wired.com › video › this-is-what-250-billion-actually-looks-likeMay 10, 2017 · [Narrator] Apple announced. their quarterly financial results. and revealed that they have a ...
Duration: 1:58
Posted: May 10, 2017CNY checks all the boxes for $250 billion federal tech investment ...
www.syracuse.com › opinion › 2021/06 › cny-checks-all-the-boxes-for-25...Jun 27, 2021 · Region can compete for semiconductor site, research hub and 5G priorities funded by Schumer's U.S Innovation and Competition Act.
[PDF] Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA): Department of Energy Loan ...
crsreports.congress.gov › product › pdfAug 5, 2022 · guarantee commitment authority would increase for both programs, including $250 billion for a temporary Section 1706 loan guarantee ...
Related searches
Pension fund rebalancing dates 2022
$250 billion
Month-end pension rebalancing
(th)
Offline
Pages: 1