New Mars Forums

Official discussion forum of The Mars Society and MarsNews.com

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Announcement: This forum is accepting new registrations via email. Please see Recruiting Topic for additional information. Write newmarsmember[at_symbol]gmail.com.
  1. Index
  2. » Search
  3. » Posts by BWhite

#2026 Re: Human missions » Space tourism & - a shuttle C hotel? » 2004-10-26 11:00:39

Hee! Hee!

I got me my own http://news.scotsman.com/uk.cfm?id=1238892004]one eyed hobo!

Go back to the very first post in this thread!

Funding. Conseco has paid $120 million to name Mile High Stadium in Denver. How much would Hyatt or Hilton or that guy who runs Virgin Airlines pay to establish a branch hotel in LEO? Every TV ad, every magazine article could remind people that "our" hotel chain operates a branch in LEO.

Earn a billion (or ten billion) frequent flyer miles and win a trip. :-)


= = =

But now, I can say we do not need shuttle C to do this.

A 5 or 6 segment Thiokol RSRM with RL-10s or RL-60s could quite probably loft a Bigelow built space hotel to a low inclination orbit quite nicely.

#2027 Re: Interplanetary transportation » 6.6 Billion Tons Of Water On The » 2004-10-22 18:49:37

The ice was thought to be spread over 10,000 to 50,000 square km (3,600 to 18,000 square miles) of area near the north pole and 5,000 to 20,000 square km (1,800 to 7,200 square miles) around the south pole, but the latest results show the water may be more concentrated in localized areas (roughly 1850 square km, or 650 square miles, at each pole) rather than being spread out over these large regions. The estimated total mass of ice is 6 trillion kg (6.6 billion tons). Uncertainties in the models mean this estimate could be off considerably.

They are still just guessing.

#2028 Re: Human missions » Funding space - How much do Americans pay for sneakers? » 2004-10-21 21:58:52

Clark,

Thank you, Thank you

It just shows what I am telling the forum , that the public can't see the benefits out of the space program and we need to advertise those facts or create a TV channel, discussing all aspects of space and space developments, space exploration, planet finding projects and more.

Then the funding will be there , because you will excite the public.

I agree with you on this. We need either or both a NASA Nation Television Station/Private Space Television Station in the United States. Along with posibly clubs for people who are interested in space. That way it would be easier for us to get a crittical mass so we could push for new space mission and generally develop space. We would be able to 50% to 70% of the U.S. Population behind it and that would be enough to do it too.

Larry,

How do we pay for this TV station? How will it compete with all the other TV stations?

NASA TV does exist, by the way.

I am not against the idea (actually, the opposite) but my question is how do we pay for it?

#2029 Re: Not So Free Chat » Presidential Elections - ...and other political discussion. » 2004-10-21 11:29:03

You are blind, while killing Irakis, Al Qaeda has now active bases in 60 countries.

Precisely - - its not about whether to fight al Qaeda, its about how to fight al Qaeda.

#2030 Re: Not So Free Chat » Presidential Elections - ...and other political discussion. » 2004-10-21 11:27:37

Messianic Prophet, ca. AD 30 :-

Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote that is in thy brother's eye.

That quote cuts lots of different ways, Shaun.

#2031 Re: Not So Free Chat » Trading on the US election - Amusement or horror? » 2004-10-21 06:56:43

On further review it would appear that one can give them money to play on the fictious stock market...

They say they are affiliated with some bank in Ireland.

As for the Man on Mars futures... haven't you lost enough to me?  tongue  big_smile

Maybe I just short sell the option, tweak my arguments at NewMars, and collect on the arbitrage.

#2032 Re: Not So Free Chat » Trading on the US election - Amusement or horror? » 2004-10-20 19:48:49

read the fine print, it's infotainment.

'Ya think? tongue

#2033 Re: Not So Free Chat » Trading on the US election - Amusement or horror? » 2004-10-20 17:33:43

http://www.intrade.com/jsp/intrade/contractSearch/]This web site allows you to buy and sell "contracts" on whether George Bush or John Kerry will win the election.

Really.

Is it legal? I don't know. Sounds a lot like gambling, but maybe not.

What we need to do is to add a "Man on Mars" futures contract.

#2035 Re: Not So Free Chat » Any poets? - Comments, CONSTRUCTIVE critisism, ideas. » 2004-10-20 13:58:39

I edit myself:

A soldier’s blood, when first shed,
Glistens brightly and questions why
With gaping eyes that cannot cry.

And passions flare, bright and red,
Parsing cause for this pain and toil;
While dried blood covers sandy soil.

Chasing glory did cause this strife,
Offerings made for the vanity of kings.
Or perhaps fame mistook for eternal life,
Something freely granted when the poet sings.

#2036 Re: Not So Free Chat » Any poets? - Comments, CONSTRUCTIVE critisism, ideas. » 2004-10-20 13:52:08

Some say sincere poetry is usually bad. I offer proof:


A soldier’s blood, when first shed,
Glistens brightly and cries out why?

Another human spark is dead,
With gaping eyes that cannot cry.

And passions flare, bright and red,
Parsing cause for this pain and toil.

Evening comes; dried blood is tread,
By angry feet trampling soil.

Chasing glory did cause this strife,
Offerings made for the vanity of kings.

Or perhaps fame mistook for eternal life,
Something freely granted when the poet sings.

#2038 Re: Not So Free Chat » To Cobra, and you other Righties! - More politics, ye be warned! » 2004-10-20 09:12:15

Cobra, read this Pat Robertson quote.

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/10/ … ...ex.html

And comment.

"You remember Mark Twain said, 'He looks like a contented Christian with four aces.' I mean he was just sitting there like, 'I'm on top of the world,' " Robertson said on the CNN show, "Paula Zahn Now."

"And I warned him about this war. I had deep misgivings about this war, deep misgivings. And I was trying to say, 'Mr. President, you had better prepare the American people for casualties.' "

Robertson said the president then told him, "Oh, no, we're not going to have any casualties."

How are we going to win the War on Terror without casualties.

#2040 Re: Not So Free Chat » To Cobra, and you other Righties! - More politics, ye be warned! » 2004-10-20 08:27:36

Whoever wins, we need to hold their feet to the fire.

Cobra, are you saying elect Bush then keep quiet and support him or elect Bush and pummel him with criticism?

#2041 Re: Not So Free Chat » To Cobra, and you other Righties! - More politics, ye be warned! » 2004-10-20 06:43:49

Kerry, the man who will run us in circles, not off the cliff.

When being led by a blind man, its best to stop.

= = =

Answer B?

Diminish the importance of the Presidency in the affairs of state.

Read Shakespeare. Henry V was a great King followed by Henry VI and Richard III.

The West v Islam is a marathon, not a sprint. Bush will divide us more and weary us for the challenges that lie ahead.

#2042 Re: Not So Free Chat » To Cobra, and you other Righties! - More politics, ye be warned! » 2004-10-20 06:18:32

Bush has a mission (from God!) to secularize all Islam. That threat may well allow them to set aside their internal divisions.

Exactly as bin Laden planned and played for.

Which is what I'm trying to get across, all this terrorism is about getting us to stomp around their lands, an attempt to create that unifying threat. Even if we decide that we'd have been better off absorbing those attacks while they keep trying it doesn't matter now. We went in, we're there. If we deem it a mistake and leave, they get exactly what they wanted. The only other choice is to stick it out. That's how we need to look at this, identifying and correcting our mistakes from a long-term war and culture-building perspective, not a "we screwed up, how do we get out" perspective.

PS - - If we intend to secularize Islam, a Christian fundamentalist is the WRONG person to lead the charge.

I'm inclined to agree, only I have this nagging suspicion that any American President leading the charge will be perceived as a Crusader by the Islamic terrorists. They'd label me as a Christian fundamentalist for Christ's sake.  big_smile Unless we get a Muslim President leading the charge the perception will be the same, and even then this hypothetical figure would just be seen as a puppet of the Infidel anyway.

I really wish the Dems had nominated Lieberman.  big_smile

If we agree Sistani is the best we can do, actually, we could have left last year. Let him whack Sadr.

Whack Saddam and hand the keys to Sistani and say to the Shias of Basra, "Sorry we let you down when Saddam attacked you after we kicked him out of Kuwait. Here. Have the country."

The reason we are staying now is to avoid giving Sistani power. Prop up Sistani as a Shia semi-pacifist alternative to the Iranian Shia and especially to Sunni/Wahabi whack jobs like bin Laden.

Going more secular than Sistani is a bridge too far for this decade.

= = =

Sistani's people are the same ones George-I encouraged to revolt against Saddam only to have us abandon them.

#2043 Re: Not So Free Chat » To Cobra, and you other Righties! - More politics, ye be warned! » 2004-10-20 05:38:52

Shaun, Cobra, others.

I want to secularize Islam. All I am saying is that we need to replace the quarterback if we are to accomplish the task.

Lets argue about that.

#2044 Re: Not So Free Chat » To Cobra, and you other Righties! - More politics, ye be warned! » 2004-10-20 05:29:26

PS - - If we intend to secularize Islam, a Christian fundamentalist is the WRONG person to lead the charge.

PPS - - And since it will take a generation, or two, to secularize Islam, to begin the campaign under the banner of a fundamentalist Christian will set the effort back years and years and years.

Cobra, can you disagree?

#2045 Re: Not So Free Chat » To Cobra, and you other Righties! - More politics, ye be warned! » 2004-10-20 05:25:54

Concerning a Saudi / Iraqi / Iranian triangle balancing act:

Perhaps. Or it might have been seen as justifying the need for a pan-Arabic jihad against some outside force, which would need to be drawn in.

But we could have played on those divisions that to divide them.

Sunni hate Shia. Arabs and Persians distrust each other. If we weren't stomping around their lands, we wouldn't be the unifying element that allows them to overcome their mutual distrust.

Bush has a mission (from God!) to secularize all Islam. That threat may well allow them to set aside their internal divisions.

Exactly as bin Laden planned and played for.

= = =

I am a uniter and not a divider True. All too true.  ???

#2046 Re: Not So Free Chat » To Cobra, and you other Righties! - More politics, ye be warned! » 2004-10-20 05:18:16

Relative to the above, see today's http://www.juancole.com/]Juan Cole:

President Bush has said that he would "accept" an "Islamic Iraq," according to AP.

If free and open Iraqi elections lead to the seating of a fundamentalist Islamic government, "I will be disappointed. But democracy is democracy," Bush said. "If that’s what the people choose, that’s what the people choose."

Given that Bush has ensconced the Christian right in many of his administration's policies, I suppose we should just check with Iyad Allawi as to whether "if free and open American elections lead to the seating of a fundamentalist Christian government," he would be willing to "accept" that.Really, the president cannot help patronizing the Iraqis. A while ago he talked about them taking off their "training wheels," as though high-powered Iraqi physicists, lawyers and physicians were somehow reduced to little children just because the US has 138,000 troops in their country.

I think it can be fairly argued that the Bush "war on terror" has actually spread Islamic fundamentalism. (Bush coddling of Ariel Sharon's harsh policies in Palestine has also contributed).

Why cannot people see that this kind of talk by Bush will enrage moderate leaning Muslims who are proud of their religion even if they despise bin Laden?

Training wheels? Persia is the cradle of civilization.

Its not about being "fair" or "correct" - - its about being prudent. Don't stomp on a people's pride unless you are ready (and able) to kill them all. Since we are not ready, able or willing to kill them all, we had better start being respectful of the moderate Muslim.

#2047 Re: Human missions » Kerry's position on space *2* - ...continue discussion here (for now) » 2004-10-20 05:10:47

Mark Whittington has a strong dislike for anything Kerry. Period.

Shaun, the Bush plan does nothing between 2004 and 2008 that cannot be undone in 2008. Indeed, with the further shuttle delays and the cost of Hubble rescue, the Bush plan will be delayed even further.

If space is seen as a "Bush plan" then that makes it even more likely the Democrats will kill it out of spite as soon as possible. Therefore we must de-politicize the need for space exploration.

The title of a book by Roger Lanuis says it all IMHO:  "Spaceflight and the Myth of Presidential Leadership"

#2048 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Falcon 1 & Falcon 9 » 2004-10-19 15:08:42

I think that it is possible for the Falcon-V to launch people. It is a viable choice of launch vehicle for a small Gemini-sized manned orbital capsule, it can probobly do this... but this is not what we need it to do.

Bigger rockets? He hasn't even flown his little one yet, and the Falcon-V is already using a five-engine cluster for the first stage, he would basicly have to start from scratch.

What about sending up a big CEV without crew on a 5 segment SRB plus liquid upper stage. Then ferry 2 or 3 crew in a tiny Falcon V crew transfer vehicle. (3 crew and a big ship for less than $100 million, maybe less than $75 million. Dock the Falcon CEV to the orbiting ship and use it for Earth return at mission end - - return as little mass to Earth as possible.)

If Bigelow used 5 segment RSRM with RL-60 upper stages for on orbit assembly of a vacant space hotel, then ferrying up passengers in a Falcon V with a big upper stage might work.

#2049 Re: Not So Free Chat » To Cobra, and you other Righties! - More politics, ye be warned! » 2004-10-19 14:02:29

We gives the Kurds Kirkuk and their own country and the bastard Sunni/Baath get NO oil.

Is it really wise to punish the entire Sunni population? Winning the hearts and minds doesn't apply in the Sunni triangle?

Maybe its that, or civil war.

Okay, let the Sunni decide whether to be part of a Shia dominated Iraq, or not. No problem here.

But Bush says he is staying until we stand up a secular government (one that lacks a natural Iraqi constituency).

#2050 Re: Not So Free Chat » To Cobra, and you other Righties! - More politics, ye be warned! » 2004-10-19 13:44:58

If Saddam had continued to control Kuwait, 9/11 would not have happened.

bin Laden got angry at the US and the Saudis after they refused to let his Afghan fighters (the ones who fought the Soviets) attempt the liberation of Kuwait.

Oh, so that's it. We hurt his feelings by rolling up the Iraqi army without him.  roll

9/11 was a psy-ops mission tailored to a unique set of circumstances.

Had we secretly funded bin Laden to wage an insurgency against Saddam (with no massive build up in Saudi Arabia) then NO, he would not have attacked us.

A balance of power conflict between Iran / Iraq / Saudi Arabia without massive US involvement would have kept the Islamicists quite busy at home.

  1. Index
  2. » Search
  3. » Posts by BWhite

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB