You are not logged in.
Russia And ESA Sign Contract For Four Soyuz Launches From Kourou
A giant leap for space activities in Europe: ministers to adopt European Space Policy in Brussels
http://www.esa.int/esaCP/SEMICLV681F_index_0.html
16 May 2007
ESA PR 20-2007. Ministers in charge of space activities in ESA's Member States and those responsible for the internal market, industry and research in the European Union’s Competitiveness Council, are meeting in Brussels on Tuesday 22 May to adopt the European Space Policy
Space Policy Rises on EU Radar
http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?F= … C=thisweek
BROOKS TIGNER, BRUSSELS
Taboo for many years for reasons of national sovereignty, questions of space policy and security are rising rapidly on the European Union’s agenda. The threats of terrorism, organized crime, illegal immigration and global warming are pushing the 27 EU nations to cooperate on space assets and services that can serve both commercial and military users.
“We all agree that there is no security [in Europe] without space,” said European Commission (EC) space official Paul Weissenberg at a May 2 hearing on space organized by the European Parliament’s subcommittee on security and defense. “If we want to be independent, Europe must use space as an asset and it must offer a mixture of civil and military applications.”
Weissenberg heads the aerospace, security, defense and equipment policy office at the EC’s Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry. His office was largely responsible for steering to completion the commission’s new European Space Policy, unveiled here April 26 after two years of sensitive negotiations with national capitals and European institutions involved in space research and operations.
The policy was presented by Gunter Verheugen, European commissioner for enterprise policy, and Jacques Dordain, the European Space Agency’s (ESA’s) director general. Dordain said the new space policy was “an important step forward for Europe; it brings an EU dimension to space and a space dimension to the EU.”
The 17-page document was defined by the commission and the Paris-based ESA in the wake of their strategic partnership in 2003 to oversee development of the European Union’s two main space programs: Galileo and the Global Monitoring for Environment and Security (GMES).
Galileo will be a global navigation network of 30 satellites and ground stations funded by the union and ESA. The GMES is a pan-European initiative funded by governments to harmonize information services based on Earth observation data for public-sector users.
Both programs have had delays, but Galileo’s have been worse due to bitter disputes over work-share and other industry issues within the industrial consortium managing Galileo’s commercial operation. The in-fighting finally forced Verheugen’s fellow commissioner for transport policy, Jacques Barrot, to issue an ultimatum in March, warning the companies to solve their issues by September or be expelled from the program.
Despite the project’s setbacks, Verheugen said, “We don’t have the option of giving up on Galileo. That is out of the question. We have to decide what kind of budget we will devote to it.”
The commission said it will propose an “appropriate legal and managerial framework” this year to meet the needs of Galileo’s industrial partners.
Galileo and GMES await definition of their security and military dimensions. While Galileo is overwhelmingly commercial in orientation, a small portion of its satellite communication bandwidth will be reserved for encrypted public-sector use, including the military.
GMES’ security applications are potentially much wider since the program’s raison d’être is to create a harmonized satellite services distribution system for public-sector users based on common software, data-sharing protocols and standardized parameters for earth observation and environmental measurements.
“The potential intelligence applications are obviously vast,” an EU official said May 3. “But there are a hell of a lot of public sector actors involved, so the coordination will be complicated. We’ll get there, bit by bit, but we’ll get there.”
The new European Space Policy sets out a number of key initiatives for the short term. These include:
• Definition by the EU nations of security-related requirements for GMES before the end of 2007.
• Identification this year of Galileo’s panoply of applications.
• Pilot phase start-up in 2008 of GMES’ first three operational services covering land, marine and emergency-response sectors.
• New research and development projects for integrated space applications to be proposed before the end of 2008.
International conference on Moon exploration and utilisation
10 May 2007
http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/Aurora/SEM997V681F_0.html
The 9th ILEWG International Conference on Exploration and Utilisation of the Moon (ICEUM9-ILC2007), co-hosted by the Italian space agency ASI and ESA, will take place in Sorrento, Italy, from 22-26 October 2007. Abstracts should be submitted before 15 June 2007.
I read some people think it could have been caused by Colliding Blackholes
Methane Rocket Engine Successfully Tested
Colonel joins space shuttle Endeavor crew
http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2007/ … ew_070508/
Staff report
Posted : Tuesday May 8, 2007 18:06:46 EDTNASA astronaut and Air Force Col. Benjamin Alvin Drew will join the crew of the STS-118 space shuttle mission, targeted for launch Aug. 9.
Drew, born in Washington, will take a seat that opened when astronaut Clayton Anderson was moved to shuttle Atlantis’ STS-117 flight, which is targeted to launch June 8. Anderson will begin a long-duration mission on the International Space Station, and current station crew member Navy Cmdr. Suni Williams will return to Earth aboard Atlantis.
Shuttle Endeavour will carry Drew on his first spaceflight. He will serve as a mission specialist during STS-118, which will deliver another segment to continue building the station by 2010. Navy Cmdr. Scott Kelly will serve as STS-118’s commander, and Marine Corps Lt. Col. Charles Hobaugh will be the pilot. Mission specialists are Tracy Caldwell, Ph.D., Rick Mastracchio, Barbara Morgan, the first educator astronaut, and Canadian Space Agency astronaut Dr. Dave Williams.
The tourism thing looks interesting, it will capture the public imagination but that's all it is - tourism, and for people with money.
Rutan/Branson = Zero exploration
Thanks for these vids, they are great
News
http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/Venus_Expre … 81F_0.html
Venus Express’ infrared camera goes filming
This May 2006 document from the National Academies (8MB PDF) has some scary numbers:
in $ billions
Observatory .......... HST ...Chandra.... JWST (projected)
Development cost .. 4.1 ..... 3.4 .......... 3.3
Lifecycle cost.......... 7.5 ...... 3.8 .......... 4.5and space science doesn't get funded huh?
I agree that robotics and unmanned missions have enjoyed some nice funding over the past years, but what they get is still pocket change compared to what NASA was spending on it's recent manned flight program, the space station may have cost over 90 billion, the Space Shuttle costs about 1 and a half billion per launch and the program may have cost 200 billion by the time Shuttle retires.
Full scale model at GSFC -
wow, it looks great
So how is Sarkozy and his support for space exploration
I think this is a cheap shot by Weldon, he would not be saying this if election time were not around the corner. As far as I understand American politics both support for manned space flight is bi-partisan and the anti-NASA lobby can be found inside both the Republican and Democratic parties. The only real difference one could claim between both parties is that the GOP try to fly on an anti-pork ticket while the Democrats often appear pro-government. People like Howard Dean, Jeb Bush, Schwarzenegger, Lampson are going to support missions to Mars no matter what party is in power. As for the anti-NASA group, well they are just going to be anti-NASA. I think the next big event for the VSE is to see if it lives beyond the next 2008 election when the next President decides if America should put people on Mars.
There could be new leader in France
It looks like Nicolas Sarkozy was headed for victory over Socialist Segolene Royal.
http://www.hindu.com/2006/12/01/images/ … 721701.jpg
I image this could improve US-French relations and he seems to be more to the right,
will he support NASA's new VSE ?
photo with bush
Here is a video talking about science technology
I wonder what this means for European space exploration
(does anyone speak French )
>>> DonPanic where are u ?
The half billion dollars is still better spent on a replacement.
Replacements aren't so easy to build they were trying to build a replacement, the JWST, it has already clocked-up 3 $ billion but it has also cost over-run by about half a billion dollars, it won't be launched until 2013
Russia-Australian launch pad project unfeasible - expert
Thanks for the links
very good info
I think there is much hope for TPF, because people understand how foolish it would be to see this mission cancelled
TPF has also been mentioned in the news
http://www.american.com/archive/2007/ap … could-mean
As more exoplanets are discovered, the impetus builds for missions on the planning board for NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA). NASA’s Terrestrial Planet Finder (TPF) mission and ESA’s Darwin mission would launch telescopic instruments which would include a spectrometer, allowing us to image and obtain the chemical composition of atmospheres of Earth-like planets. Are we indeed a “rare Earth”? In the coming decades, we should prepare to find out.
http://blog.scifi.com/tech/archives/200 … lesco.html
The discovery of possibly habitable planet Gliese 581C last week by European astronomers (working from a telescope in Chile) caused a stir in the stargazing world. Some people are already wondering how they can get there. But let's not get ahead of ourselves: Nobody has actually seen the planet that's been calculated to be orbiting Gliese 581, a dim red star that's part of the Libra constellation. We just know its size (five times larger than earth), and its possible temperature range (0 to 40° Celsius).Times like these call for special space-based telescopes called Terrestrial Planet Finders (TPFs), which are made to detect Earth-like aspects of planets in other solar systems. Wired has posted a gallery of renderings of NASA's proposed TPF and the European Space Agency's proposed Darwin mission, which would serve a similar purpose. Both projects have run into "political, technical and financial difficulties," according to The New York Times. Perhaps the Gliese 581C discovery will inspire the people in charge to solve them.
I think this could be a great mission
It's also been mentioned in the news
In the near future, with the launch of NASA's Kepler Mission in 2008, we'll have the tools to seek evidence of Earth-size planets in the habitable zone of distant stars.
http://www.space.com/searchforlife/0704 … rsday.html
Scientists currently have a census of over 200 Jupiter-sized planets orbiting near stars, but no real idea how common Earth-size planets are. NASA Ames's Jack Lissauer explains the focus on the big boys isn't because gas giants are the most common but because they're most easily detectable with today's equipment.
"It would be like looking from a distance at a street light at night and concluding most of the insects in the area are moths. There could be far more gnats flying around but you couldn't know."
And, if we want to search for life, we need to stick to where we think it can flourish
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/04/12 … et_search/
http://www.sunjournal.com/story/209220- … rbor_life/
NASA plans to launch such a mission next year, named Kepler, to scour the skies for Earthlike planets."Kepler will monitor 100,000 stars for four years with enough precision to find Earth-size planets in the habitable zone," said William Borucki, a space scientist at NASA's Ames Research Center. Astronomers define a "habitable zone" as one that's not too hot or too cold, and not too near its star to permit life.
"Habitable," of course, isn't the same as "inhabited." Scientists say liquid water is essential for life, but its presence doesn't mean that anything is alive there.
So maybe the quoted price is off for the upper stage.
I am more concerned thou with how the contract will get written in that Nasa has a habit of not paying per piece but writting that the company delivers per request but is paid full contract value regardless how many get made. Of course the contract that Nasa writes for the contractors gets written for the largest quantity value and the dollars are inflated to cover that number. The contractor laughs all the way to the bank knowing that there is extra cash in it for them.
I've been reading the Ares-V is coming along great, crew are going to be launched the day after the LSAM/EDS stack, however I've also been reading about online rumors more talk of downsizing the CEV and the EELV fans are unhappy and there has been more chat on more of the CEV/CLV problems.
Let's hope NASA can fix this.
The next 2 years will prove to be crucial to the whole outlook of VSE
First there is too much politics in NASA and there are members of the Republican party like Richard Shelby and both Democratic leaders who are not happy with Griffin at the helm of NASA (I suspect these anti-Griffin Democrats and Republicans are just anti-Spaceflight period)
2 Big things need to happen for it to be clear sailing, if Griffin stay in charge at NASA with no more cuts, and if the next US President continues to support return to the Moon and putting people on Mars....then it's all clear sailing.
But those are two VERY BIG IFS
That's pretty amazing technology
Corot from science blogs
$230 billion is the BIG shock number invented by the GAO last year for the entire cost of VSE out to 2025.
I've seen bigger numbers printed in the US media,
big numbers that quote figures somewhere between 950 million and 1 trillion dollars for the next few years
Upcoming missions fix Hubble, launch JWST, do sample returns and manned missions to Moon and Mars...can cost over 1 trillion dollars say a number of US media outlets
Some priced the original SEI at half a trillion dollars