You are not logged in.
Deep fried... Mars Bars? Sounds positively dreadful. <insert "blech" emoticon>
I never cease to be amazed at what my fellow humans will seek out and ingest.
So what are we doing about it and what can be done, The first is a ban on smoking in all public places, resturants, pubs, buses in the street?
Too much tax revenue at stake, at least here in the states. Raising taxes on cigarettes is one of the knee-jerk responses to budget shortfalls at the state and local level, banning smoking undercuts too much revenue (as New York recently discovered). It's similar to the laws surrounding drunk driving, they're justified on public safety grounds but in reality they generate too much income for them to ever be allowed to succeed in their stated goal.
Better to just warn people and let them do as they will, whether it be sucking on a cancer stick or scarfing down a few deep fried Mars Bars.
But then our present healthcare structure encourages everyone to want to meddle in the affairs of others, bah, better cut this off before a rant ensues.
![]()
What makes someone stick a Mars Bar in a deep-fryer? :hm:
I think it does come down to money. In Scotland with a National Health Service all medical treatment for people suffering from the effects of smoking or poor diet control and people who are incapacitated as a result the state will pay for.
Medical bills are going up and up and with treatment costs it seems that expenditure versus tax raised is close to even about now. And there is the consideration that people who are healthier are more likely to be gainfully employed and so tax earners.
And the story is that the deep fried mars bar came about due to a bet between a fish bar owner and a customer that he could not fry everything and if he did the customer would not eat it.
What I'm saying is that any bodily trauma bad enough to justify transfusion would probably not be survivable on Mars anyway.
With the exception of amputations of course.
After all, Lord Nelson had his injured arm amputated in a tiny rowboat rocking violently back and forth.
But the Naval doctors had the ability to amputate, seal and sow the wound in the matter of a minute or so. In fact when it comes down to amputations the butchers on those ships where a lot lot faster than the doctors we have. Then again they had the practice, most wounds resulted in amputations.
But it still does not get rid of the problem that any severe injury caused to a crewmember would likely result in not one crew member being permanently unavailable but two. Someone has to look after the sick person.
Bulldozers rely on there weight and grunt to be able to scoop. For the front end of a Bulldozer to actually bite into the soil relies purely on the force downwards of their mass and gravity. So it is impossible for them to be scaled back in weight. If we find that Mars like the Moon has the regolith fairly loose for about 15cm then being very compacted it becomes a different matter.
If this is the case then a Martian Bulldozer to be able to function will have to be a lot heavier to be able to do the same amount of work. On the Moon Bulldozers will likely not work and this may be the case on Mars too. The gravity element will simply not be powerful enough.
Of course there are other ways to be able to scoop Regolith up like Draglines or even rotating brushes and it can allways be done by a lot smaller digging implements. But only going to there and trying it out will we find out.
edit
And dont forget the possibility of permafrost. in that case its a whole different matter this material will be so hard it becomes time for a little bit of a blast.
There is a serious side to the arquements about the deep fried Mars bar. In Scotland we do have a problem of Heart disease caused by inapropiate foods and smoking. Obesity though on the increase is still nothing like as bad as what the USA has to suffer. And frankly the modern way of working increases this risk.
So what are we doing about it and what can be done, The first is a ban on smoking in all public places, resturants, pubs, buses in the street? A serious increase in sports and activities available to the children and what seems to be the most confrontational a public health warning to be put on fast food. This is your mcdonalds, kfc etc.
It is from this that the deep fried mars bar gets its bad rep but then again if it is treated like what it is a luxury food it is not as if people eat it all the time only very occasionly.
And Shaun you are only jealous of Scots as it rains here all the time
Sunlight is available somewhere on the moon all the time and a simple circumfrential power grid will allow power to be deployed anywhere its required.
NEO asteroids are easier to get to than the Moon and Mars and it makes sense to get rid of these just so they no longer pose a threat to the Earth. The problem is though its these asteroids composition that makes them less valuable tending to be stony rather than the metal rich or carbaceous chondrites we really would prefer.
But pholtovoltaics will only power as long as they point to there power source the sun. This is not really a quarantee as they roll. Unlike the easy computations that tell us where lunar mass driver material will go to.
Hah, but in Scotland we tend to get a fish and chip shop to put batter on them and a half a minute in a deep fat fryer and then eat. There certainly is not anything sweeter especially glugging down Irn Bru at the same time.
Certainly reminds me of the last old firm game.
Of course this could be training for the day when GPS could be shot out of space by a hostile power or the US had to shut down its own system and needed to strike somewhere.
At the moment the EU is certainly an economic creature but I think momentum and a bit of push will make it more a political power. With its plan to create an EU police and army and with the constitution coming up its likely to either go superstate or to break apart.
I reserve comment on which i would prefer
THEY ARE GREAT!
But on the serious side the Health inspectors have decided to take them away as they are a serious concentration of calories. But i doubt they will have much luck.
The main asteroid belt is between Mars and Jupiter. At that distance the effectiveness of solar power is much reduced. This is not the case on the Moon where it is possible to make easily made solar cells which though only about 5% minimum effectiveness provide a lot of power.
This constant power is the lifeblood of Mass drivers and it makes them cheap, especially as the solar cells made on the Moon come from easily collectable silicon and are radiation hardened naturally and easy to make.
The military have a long history of testing new technology as a science project for the Moon. Clementine showed that the military are willing to do science but only if it will ultimatly benefit them.
If such an accident does occur on Mars it will likely prove to be either fatal or completely debilitating to the astronaut. We cannot use prosthetics to help such an astronaut prosthetics apart from the most crude versions require incredibly detailed adjustments to be able to work and be worn with a reasonable level of comfort. Not to mention such an injury so far from home would require endless hours of physiopherapy and aiding of the astronaut to be able to even to function.
One rather nasty but likely possibility is that Martian astronauts will find themselves at risk of frostbite. And this may result in loss of minor appendages ie fingers toes.
Another more dangerous possibility is damage to eyesight due to the effects of super dry martian fines and the risk of having blind astronauts,
Frankly we have to be aware of the risks of being so far from possible intervention and we have to design the mission scenario carefully and to do the research that ensure maximum survivability for amount of useful return. But sending prosthetics is a no go. We cant fit them and we certainly do not want to spare the mass. Id rather send a lot more tubs of petroleoum jelly. Something that will be a godsend to the first Martian astronauts.
There is another thread and it gives a bit on some other possible candidates.
Hoagland dont know the guy is he really that bad ???
It may work it really then just comes down to how much mass can be moved by such a device. And is it really worth it, of course we could always attach a solar power satelite on the top of the chord. Certainly would sort the long Day/Night power problem until a circumfrential power grid and soletta arrays are possibly in place.
Mass drivers as Naval weapons are pretty much going to be the Standard on surface combatants in western navies in the next 20 years. Both the US and Great Britain have done a lot of research into using this technology. Actually the Mass driver is a much more accurate weapon than the use of conventional weapons and it lends itself to in flight correction and reduces barrel wear to a fraction of a normal artillery piece. Another side benefit is the reduced risk of ammunition explosion either through enemy fire or accident as the main round of a mass driver being purely kinetic requires no explosives as propellant.
I think you will find that a mass driver on the Moon will make a better proposition than one located on an asteroid certainly at first. The Moon unlike most asteroids has an abundance of the most important ingredient that a Mass driver requires in this case, power. Of course we could use Mass drivers to redirect an asteroid into a better orbit for us to use its materials. But then we have the potential for serious political problems and a security nightmare.
NASA operates in a very political way(Yeah, I know im telling the initiated) to get funds, you must be able to gain and trade favours allways remembering that each time you make a decision to cut costs you will find half of the senate on your heels demanding that there special project in there state is saved. And when you are not you have us the space advocates and the press saying what a waste NASA does nothing except make taxes go up.
I really pity the poor man or woman who gets the job.
There has been many proposals for TSTO which use the efficiency of normal jet engines until they are much higher then either boost the jet engine through various fuel or afterburner effects or to actually have a rocket aboard that pushes the carrier plane to the required speed and height for seperation. Then the upper stage will use its rocket engine to enter LEO. Advantages to this is the carrier stage is completely reusable and only has to use its rocket or boosted engine for a short while. And the seperation of the two craft happens at a point where there is a reduced atmosphere to impact dangerously on the seperation operation.
Seperation of TSTO aircraft was always the most dangerous part of the launch. The saanger aircraft designed by Germany had real problems with this issue.
I favor dirt and worms, as soon as it becomes feasible to have them, over hydroponics for the first generations of Martian settlement because of the moving parts issue. If you can bring the microbes and worms from Earth along with the minimum of chemical fertilizer, then treat some regolith as described further up this thread, you have dirt. Dirt+organic waste+attention=more dirt. A hydroponics setup, however, has parts that wear out, and until the Martians can make replacements on Mars from raw materials, those parts will have to come from Earth. On the other hand, a hydroponics setup can produce lots more food in much less space, and don't some versions double as water purifiers . . . ? I think a permanent base should start with a double hydroponics/dirt setup, then go to all dirt as parts wear out, then back to hydroponics when Martians are doing their own manufacturing.
The main principle behind hydroponics is gravity it is the gentle running water flowing down hill that powers the system with the occasional astronaut pouring the solution in the lower bucket into the top one...simplicity.
Why use such a basic system, basically hydroponics lends itself to using lights etc to stimulate growth. And we will have to use these artificial lights just to top up the poor amount of light available naturally. And we cant really afford to have pumps drawing power as well and it is best to set up a system that requires as little mechanical devices as possible. We can also use hydroponics to break down the water that astronauts use for washing so called grey water into useful systems.
Quote RobS Dec. 07 2004, 19:03
Grypd, I dont think rare metals are that serious of a problem. I dont think basalt, for example has significant quantities of them. Most soils on Earth dont have them. There may be soils on Mars that have them, though.
We can be assured that trace rare metals will be spread across the martian regolith there is no soil or condensation to have kept it stuck to the ground and each dust storm will simply move it about. We cannot take the risk of astronauts being affected by the insidious ways that metals poison people. We do know the Regolith fines will get everywhere and pose a danger to a lot of systems. At least with Hydroponics these can be filtered to remove as much as is possible. What we also do know is the Mars has a lot of sulfur. These for plants are extremely dangerous and will damage them. Also the oxygen is bound up in the form of stable iron oxides so reducing two important needed elements to impossible to get at. Iron and free Oxygen. Bluntly the Martian soil is a salty mess with no biomass and it would have to be extensively treated to become useful. You put a worm in the Martian soil and it will become dessicated very very quickly.
International cooperation is one of the best ways countries can actually afford the expenses that will come of any advanced missions into space like manned missions to Mars.
The USA could probably do it on its own but with the costs it would always be at a risk of being cut to provide funds for something that a new administration considers more important.
ESA is an example of international cooperation it is a multi state operation but is independent in nature and functions very well. It may be possible to set up a new space organisation that could do the job instead of relying on the agreements between various states that made the ISS a fiscal disaster.
It seems that NASA will need a new leader soon it is expected that Sean O'keefe will hand in his resignation soon and take of to become the Chancellor of a university.
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewnews.h … 6]Spaceref article
So who will lead the team taking NASA into the Bush plan?
Plants that eat metal or store it in their leaves or stems are common. But if we use this method it still relies on no seepage of dangerous metals and chemicals from outside. You see the problem is that as stated most plants do actually store metals, it is when we eat them that we begin to store these dangerous compounds too. We have to find a way without needing the whole of mars terraformed to be able to plant and grow food plants for people. If as it seems likely that Martian soil contains chemicals which would slowly poison us ie arsenic then we must reduce our plants exposure to these chemicals. And Hydroponics is one of the easiest ways others include digging ditches lining them with triple barriers of materials to stop all chemical seepage then putting treated and fertilised soil back in. But this is for the future as any mission can easily just use hydroponics then we let the future decide which method gives the best yield for the lowest cost basis.
With Mars we have access to a lot of carbon it is though nitrates that we have a shortage off and human waste tends to be mostly carbon based. So we will need to find Nitrates to add to the mixtures to allow the plants to grow well. Anyone for a trip to the gas giants?
Little history lesson one of the most important materials man had on earth was the Bird droppings of the seabirds and bats. Quano was so important before the modern chemical industry that wars where fought over it.
So we will need to find Nitrates if we want to occupy Mars on mass.
What we have found is that not all asteroids are the same. Some are a collection of smaller bodies being held together by local forces and having a wek crust .Now if we use a nuclear weapon to attempt to shift it would likely have little effect, except one, the roque asteroid would break up and act like a gigantic sawnoff shotgun doing more damage to the Earth than a single strike on its own would do.
It is actually easier for us to reach NEO asteroids than the Martian moons or even the Moon. As these do in fact pose a threat it makes more sense to actually investigate these as they have what we would call the most dangerous kind amongst there numbers the stony irons etc. We should visit these as it is thought they pose our greatest threat (the next being comets) and see what it would take to move them.
Heh we could always use one if there is a comet on its way to hit us as the first intergalactic white pool ball and so knocking the threat away. (Then again doing it would be so hard and a such a technical nightmare that there is no chance)
We could break down Martian rock into small stones and then use it as a feedbed with nutrients supplied by hydroponics. The feedbed is slightly sloped so that it allows gravity to get the nutrient solution moving.
This will allow the maximum amount of food supplied with less loss to seepage etc of planting straight into ground. Also generally hydroponics will allow easier inspection and planting for the scientists. Also will stop possible poisoning if kept well of the surface from regolith being brought into the greenhouse on boots etc. This is important as it is possible that the regolith may hold chemicals that could act like long term poisons to the people and any buildup in the body has to be avoided. Other protection and incidentally cold protection is to have the plants inside tunnels of clear plastic inside the greenhouse. We can pump atmosphere inside the tunnels to make a highly charged co2 atmosphere and a slight overpressure so helping to keep fines out.