You are not logged in.
No, the underlying problems with the Soviet system put them out of business. You have no clue about the Soviet economics.
What Reagan did was create a credit-based economy, leaving Bush Sr. to clean it up, who in turn left it to Clinton to clean it up. After Clinton cleaned it up, the new Bush has brought it back.
I remember you saying some rather offensive things about the pope.
do you go to church every sunday? attend every necessary church service? know the bible front to back?
what is earth going to do when heavy industry is gone? stagnate.
i never said i have proof. it is, as i said, an opinion.
It would actually be a combination of children, teachers, parents, and other independent observers determining this. believe me, i thought of that. as many different perspectives as reasonable possible would be considered for each child.
I can't really do much for design, only offer theoretical ideas or thoughts, but I can write a letter. If I do well on my nuclear essay, I'll use that to add weight to my letters to politicians. If a national science essay winner writes a space advocacy letter, hopefully it will get some notice.
Good luck!
I guess nobody liked my idea ???
Depends. If the simpler solution costs us more money in the end, no. And if it costs so much that it stops us from getting to our destination, no again.
Cal: most of our economy is based on small businesses. 80% of companies in the country, approximately, are small businesses, and this is where the average joe works. giving the wealthy money so they can buy imported caviar and wine for their office parties isnt going to help bob the builder.
I'm fairly good at writing things, you may have seen my greenpeace letter.
I can also do a decent programming job, but my friend is incredible. he won the national pepsi website challenge last year, a national deca event.
there are a lot of other things i can do, which i will mention as i think of them.
http://www.highliftsystems.com/convert....ts.html
Also:
"We have received 10 CNT composite samples from Foster-Miller and those have been sent to Los Alamos for testing in an atomic oxygen chamber. We also received a 60 m length of CNT composite fiber from Kentucky that will be used for demonstration purposes among other things. We have already turned that length into a 2 ft length of 1/5 inch wide ribbon with tape interconnects. It certainly looks nice."
"We have also heard of some progress that indicates CNT composites are moving along more quickly than we had hoped.
Quantitative news will be a few months in coming but I just thought I would wet everyone's appetite. Now, two independent groups have reported kilometer-length CNT composite fibers with good interfacial adhesion in different matrices.
In addition we have done some modifications on the climber and spacecraft to improve the design. We have also begun planning for the ramp up in our efforts. We have looked at facilities that we will need, the numbers and types of people we need, where to locate, all those business type things. This has meant that Michael and I have spent more time on the road than at home but it is part of the process."
both from the highliftsystems website. can you tell that i like the idea of a space elevator?
No. If you give birth to a child, you have every right to raise it.
But I think, as I have seen before, that the best system would be apprenticeship combined with conventional schooling. If a child shows a special interest or aptitude in a subject or field, have him train in that field as an apprentice. this system worked in europe for centuries. when combined with normal schooling (say, 4 or 5 hours a day of each, or 3, 8 hour school days a week and 2, 8 hour work days a week), would provide a child with a practical and rounded education.
the children could beging apprenticeship at 13-15, around the work age for children now, except that they would be learning their career and helping society at the same time, rather than manning the window at McDonald's. Children could start at better positions or receive more benefits for better schoolwork, so that could be an incentive to pay attention in class
nobody I know misses the 80's. i just remember my grandfather yelling at the very mention of reagan, who cost him his job because of his porking of the rich.
no, the wealthiest 1% doesnt control the economy. stock investments dont help the average joe. the real estate industry is fueled by the middle class, not the upper class.
You really should take an economics class.
cal: you said that shes in the ghetto because of lack of education. what can she do in todays world with no education? many kids in the ghetto have missing fathers, and many have to take care of their families, and have to drop out of high school to take multiple jobs. i used to live in a neighborhood like this.
yes, i admit it, being white gives me an advantage. theres nothing wrong with being white, its just accepting that our society is based on the WASP (im half lutheran, so im not being racist here), and always has been, since the puritans landed in Plymouth. How many blacks do you see on the Forbes list?
You can say that some people dont seize the opportunities available, but not the whole race! I know some dumb kids in my, relatively rich neighborhood, who will always be rich, because their mommies and daddies made it big. will the housekeeper ever get ahead? no, theyre more concerned about meeting the bills. what opportunity do they have?
youre right cal, you shouldnt give women an opportunity to leave the kitchen. its her fault shes there in the first place. the logic is a perfect tautology, either way, she doesnt get ahead. i hold open the door for anybody, male or female, black or white, when they walk up behind me in the hallway. does that mean im a renaissance man?
like phobos has said, the space elevator could replace (1). (2) is good, but not as important to me, because in 10 years, when the elevator is due to be finished, ill be fresh out of college, and ready for action. i want to be in the first mars mission program!
(3) is good even if we use nuclear propulsion. reduce risks to null if possible. and send off an ion drive ship via the space elevator. assemble the ship in orbit, and fire the ion drives. the high thrust is, as far as i can tell, only important for lifting the material off of earth, and the space elevator gets rid of this need. could you use an orbital escape assist to provide a jumpstart?
nuclear propulsion is a good thing. combining ion and nuclear pulse in a single ship is even better-pulses can be used for quick manuvers, but for cruising, ion drives higher isp can be utilized.
I think this time around, funding from wherever possible is important. governments can provide a good percentage, but the private industry will be just as important. there is a LOT of money to be had in the private sector.
so, i think that we should follow (3) and (4), but with modifications.
I'm entering a dupont essay challenge. if i place in the top 50 (national contest for science sponsored by dupont), im going to send a modified copy to all my local and state politicians, along with bill o'reilly.
oh, about the orion. i have mentioned before that the space elevator could bring it up piecemeal, orbital assembly, and send off. no earth launch is needed for the orion to provide us the benefits of quick travel and huge payload.
no, how about this, america is easy to blame for everything, so lets blame everything on america!
alt, read something besides ultra-liberal media. try a refreshing look at an objective source.
There are green aliens living on every planet outside of our solar system that can be lived on. Well, Im right because you cant prove me wrong.
How come it didnt work for Raegan and Bush Sr. Cal? Why hasnt it done anything for our economy now? It just doesnt work. How many times does trickle down economics have to fail before we stop trying it?
And the vast percentage of businesses in this country are small business, not money fat corporations like enron, who the bush tax cuts help.
Thanks for rehashing the party line.
ah, using nukes on china, i see. theyre not people just like us? We decide who lives and dies based on our power monopoly on nukes? I completely disagree with this point of view.
When Iraq had the chance, it used its revenues for things completely different from oil. Like palaces. Saddam doesnt care about feeding his people, so the US gets the blame.
cal, thats not harvard economics, thats reaganomics. yes, it created millionares, but it made our poor poorer, and it created a lot more of them. it hurt our economy much more than it hurt.
and should north korea invade us because we have nuclear weapons? why havent we stopped china? im right on a lot of things, but this is bullying at its finest.
Who are we to keep tabs on anyone? why do we have a nuclear monopoly, along with russia?
and your post clearly states if they were overrun. as i said, having nuclear weapons doesnt necessarily mean we have to attack them. im divided on this issue. on one hand, sovereignty is at stake. on another WMDs are dangerous, and i think nobody should have them, including us.
the republican party wouldnt go for mccain because he actually wanted to, *gasp* change the way things were done.
i never criticized you for being from colorado. a weee bit defensive today, are we? but no, i was referring to the impoverished conditions that are mostly suffered by the minority. Lynchings, are, as you know, illegal. But it is statistically true, men make more money for the same work.
I would type more, but i must go.
no, not just ties. he was just as corrupt as anyone. his pockets are lined with dirty money.
go to the doe website. how deep do you have to dig to find out the nasty realities of fossil fuel? the guy cut funding to fuel cell and electric car research. he can build all the nuclear plants he wants, and i support that, he intends to keep our cars running on gas. not signing the kyoto treaty. why?
yes, how long am i going to have to be patient? if he draws it out long enough, it will be an obligation for the next president to fill. at this rate, he will only pay $10 billion during this term. The money was emergency relief. Next term, he will say the emergency relief is over and the money is no longer needed.
his tax cuts benefit the wealthy exponentially more than the average person. the average person receives a tax break of $300. A person making $100k+ receives around $10k+. explain how this helps the economy. People are more likely to stick the $300 in a bank than spend it on anything.
And yes, I do know this. Iraq has never mentioned Al-Qaeda, and vice versa. It's funny, Iraq is one of the few countries Bin Laden never talks about. I think bin laden views saddam as a secular guy, and a threat to his muslim supremacy.
if i were running for president...i would have a little self-control with regards to the media. At least wait until you get out of the room.