You are not logged in.
So, the idea of sun following economic cycles may not be a wrong path. "Superpower", or "Surplus Power", may be a gift that we will want to utilize.
Alright EV's and Robots, might migrate North and South with the sun. Perhaps very large Semi Trucks with factory process inside of them.
Presumably they would be making things using electric power.
So, in a rational North America, they might be in Canada and Alaska in Mid Summer. In the Mexican Deserts in Mid Winter. Leaving Canada and Mexico out of it, the USA could do a lesser process.
Mid Summer in the North, Mid Winter in the South. So, they would be soaking up excess energy from the local grids, to make useful product.
In some places in the south excess energy might be devoted to making clean water. Recycled water, and maybe desalinization. The new method of desalinization on the Ocean Floors, seems like it may be less disruptive of ecology.
And surplus electric energy in the south may allow pumping water to places like reservoirs, and to refill aquifers.
As far as humans go, then some migration of humans along with the machines might make sense as they also consume water and energy and may want the product that the machines would create. So, perhaps some parts of housing could be mobile as well.
For America this may require some calculation of what the population is for use in the House of Representatives, and the Electoral Colledge.
Ending Pending
This would avoid moving electrical surges across the continent, and also to some extent moving water to satisfy humans. Instead, you would move some of the humans and let them enjoy the best weather situations. If you are not exposed to extreme weather, then you do not need as big a dwelling space as you may be outdoors more.
Ending Pending
I think my point was that this objects if it were alien would be a stupid thing for a sneaky alien civilization to do in a Dark Forest galaxy.
Sneaky would be to arrange for brilliant minds to discover things that were to lead to AI and Robots. That might imply that they have a few agents among us already. Perhaps software agents that they somehow infected our system with.
If they had to risk some sort of spaceflight where their ships might be observed the might arrange to meddle with humans on occasion to create red herrings. For instance, practicing proctology on humans so that the humans would report silly stories. That would help to discredit actual situations where they accidentally revealed themselves.
A slow boiled frog situation would have them direct the direction of our culture to suit their desires. Slowly robots and AI would be more and more important on Earth and perhaps the solar system.
Over time the existence of cultures similar to the one they caused us to develop might be revealed. But in reality, that could be just a story we were told, they might give us a cleaned-up view of what they really were. They might be partially robotic and partly organic and might consist of many types of organic on various worlds. The entities that we supposedly see, may be of our DNA, because they collected it in the past and created organic robots that they could use in interacting with Earth.
In a Dark Forest this might be how they make sure that we will not be taken over by their predatory competitors.
Also with the notion of a "Random Walk", it may be that they will get some type of discovery by interacting with us.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Isaac Arthur has speculated that Civilizations will not want to send out colonies to other stars as those colonies might mutate into a hostile alien competitor.
A twist on that could be the Polynesian one. They plant baby civilizations on various worlds, perhaps even using local "DNA" if that is the nature of the organism. In order to keep the threat in control of these transplants they check up on them periodically and Wack them if they see more progress than they want.
This would be like a dead man switch. If their core culture was still capable of monitoring us, then they would knock us flat periodically. If they have fallen and cannot Wack us then one or more of their "Children" rise to power as a new civilization.
An evidence that we had progressed more than expected would be signs of activity on Mars, Venus, and the Moons of Jupiter. That might indicate that they would not only have to Wack Earth but wipe out whatever we had place on Mars or around Venus or on the Moons of Jupiter.
I suppose that the good news is that they would probably limit the amount of destruction they inflicted on Earth. And they might have to send agents of some kind to help make sure we fell into dark ages.
It is hard to say if any alien would think this is a good idea. How would we know? I guess the best we could do is think outside of what normal humans might think.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I do not expect that the object is hollow, but I suppose there is a small chance. If it is, then they are not going to be Suttle, but will decide how much to Wack us, and have the confidence that they can make us superstitious of things in the sky, and degrade our "Civilization" in a desirable measure.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
But if it is a giant rock, then the aliens most likely are not behind it. It would be overkill.
And that would mean that there may be much more baryonic matter between the stars than we have thought.
That would make going between stars harder as small impactors may be everywhere. But it would also perhaps allow us to island hop on rogue worlds that we are not yet able to detect.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So, it is exciting. If it is aliens and they want to set us back, I don't think it is likely that we could resist the process very well.
Ending Pending
I don't know where else to put this. Imagine if we ever meet Dinasaur Aliens: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … &FORM=VIRE Quote:
Vinny the Galah Cockatoo is TALKING for 10 minutes straight!
YouTube
MARLENE MC'COHEN
40 views
I think it is actually true.
That little brain does a lot. Imagine if a Dinasaur Alien had a brain our size?
I guess we inherited because of that Asteroid.
Ending Pending
This is a long video and you may have seen it before: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHdUMDV … ithHerbert
Quote:
EXCLUSIVE: Tony Seba "AI Robots Will Change Our WORLD"
Brighter with Herbert
138K subscribers
In previous posts here, I have begun to involve "Torrefaction" with electric sources of energy to convert organic materials to Biochar and also Hydrogen, Methane, and Tar.
I would like to appeal to what I consider rational thinking. At least from my point of view.
Now is it silly to let Northern Forests burn down because they were not managed or not? I pollute air above the North American Continent.
Many of these are Canadian, and much of land that may go feral if Tony Seba is correct. So, eventually we in America will have problems with forest fires where farm land used to be. Unless the land is groomed.
Take a look at it do you want forests to burn down putting particle pollution into the air and also putting CO2 into the Air? Does that make sense? Canada says it wants to go green, but they let their forests burn, and put lots of CO2 into the Atmosphere. And the USA will be in a similar situation if indeed, we allow a lot of farmlands to go feral.
The products of "Torrefaction" will yield Hydrogen and Methane which can be used in Precision Fermentation and also likely in Cellular Farming. So, this will be a form of farming that will not so much depend on growing seasons.
The concept of Pleistocene Park hope to hold back the excessive thawing of permafrost in the north. This may apply to our state of Alaska also. https://pleistocenepark.ru/
The use of some animals and robots may allow a certain percentage of the Taiga: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiga
Could be converted back to Mammoth Steppe, to provide fire brakes and to reduce the thawing of permafrost. The weeds and brush could be processed by Torrefaction to produce wealth and to reduce the release of CO2 into the atmosphere. This would also be firebrakes.
America could have migrating robots to do this, possibly Canada would do it as well.
While Bison may be destructive to Solar Panels, and equipment I am tempted to consider processing Buffalo Chips. Possibly a risk of stinky, but with good technology that perhaps could be avoided.
Lets say people in the North might burn 1/2 of the Charcoal produced in the less sunny months and put the other 1/2 into bogs and in the soils.
Robots would migrate north and south following the seasons.
The problem between the USA and Canada just now is from my point of view, a north culture that does not respect the individual. Also, the USA culture has been "Sinning" against the American spirit for some time, but I think we are in reform under the "Orange Man".
So the compatibility of Canada and the USA is in question as I do not trust the efforts by global elites to replace Americans and to try to make us into surfs. I think Canada is held more strongly in bondage by them than the USA is.
My current notions. Everyone has notions.
Ending Pending
Now, it becomes obvious that if you fall short of solar energy in a winter at high latitudes you could both burn charcoal in the brick oven and conduct "Torrefaction" (See previous post).
The gasses produced, Hydrogen and Methane could in another version support Precision Fermentation.
If you sequester 1/2 of the charcoal you create and burn 1/2 in the winter season, you have reduced the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, and yet have a burnable energy source for when necessary.
I suppose one could hope for some sort of fuel cell that could process Charcoal efficiently.
Ending Pending
Continuing on similar lines to the previous post:
https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … &FORM=VIRE
Quote:
A JuMBO Mystery - This Shouldn't Happen!
YouTube
Cool Worlds
328.5K views
Jul 11, 2024
I think this can be solved by combining both sources of rogue planets. Ejection and Collapse.
Ejected objects in a stellar nursery or thick dust cloud could have a secondary condensation. They might also condense moons around them from something resembling a Oort Cloud or Kuiper belt.
Probably easier for ejections in a star nursery, to have a secondary accretion within that nursery, but I would not rule out a rouge planet drifting into a thick cloud and then having an additional accretion event.
This then might create something I want very much. A Super Earth with its own moons, as a rogue too cool to see with our current technology.
If we could find these, and particularly if nearby, then good things could be done, in my opinion.
Quote from post #88:
But of course odds are rather low for that. But a Super Earth or Earth sized with a significant moon would be useful.
We could establish robots on each of these, perhaps even the Super Earth, if there is one. Geothermal from a Super Earth could be beamed up to a Moon where humans might better dwell.
Even if rockets could not escape the Super Earth robots assigned to work on the Super Earth would not be stranded there, as their minds could be beamed back and forth. And Humans as well, could have robot bodies on that Super Earth.
So, as a rogue planet scheme that as well could be a useful pattern.
So, the Super Earth could have a rocky surface, or an icy surface or a liquid water surface. It would have significant Geo heat. It might have winds. The atmosphere might be crushing, but even so with any type of surface, it might be possible to establish energy harvesting, and the energy could be beamed to a moon, which hopefully would exist.
Robots on the Super Earth even if physically stranded could beam their minds up and down from the moon or moons.
Humans might likely only live on the moons or in orbit, but they also could have telepresence on the surface of the Super Earth. Ideally one or more moon would not have completely differentiated so that rocky materials would be available.
If it turns out that fusion becomes an economic form of energy, then the vast atmosphere of the Super Earth could supply fusion fuels, and again energy to be beamed up to the moons. (I hope a thick atmosphere would not block that).
Ending Pending
Optimus is a quiet thing it seems: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … &FORM=VIRE Quote:
Tesla Optimus Moves Silently! The Truth Behind this Impressive Design? (Not A Rumor)
YouTube
Techno Creators
10 views
This could be important in homes as well, if the robot is to work when people are trying to sleep.
An unexpected desired quality.
Ending Pending
Just some stuff about batteries.
https://www.helleniscope.com/2025/07/12 … thium-era/ Quote:
ΘέματαΑμερικήΔιεθνή
Aluminum-Ion: Tesla’s $1,750 Battery Breakthrough Could End the Lithium Era
By Helleniscope -July 12, 202582516
Other Contenders:
https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … &FORM=VIRE Quote:
This Ordinary Metal Could Replace Every Battery You Know
YouTube
The Forge Empire
Seems hopeful.
Ending Pending
This would be nice: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technolo … r-AA1Lbd3e Quote:
Forget Planet X! Beyond Neptune, There Might Be An Earth-Sized Planet Y
Story by Dr. Alfredo Carpineti • 2d •
3 min read
I would like something slightly less than the mass of Earth, with a set of moons perhaps.
But of course odds are rather low for that. But a Super Earth or Earth sized with a significant moon would be useful.
We could establish robots on each of these, perhaps even the Super Earth, if there is one. Geothermal from a Super Earth could be beamed up to a Moon where humans might better dwell.
Even if rockets could not escape the Super Earth robots assigned to work on the Super Earth would not be stranded there, as their minds could be beamed back and forth. And Humans as well, could have robot bodies on that Super Earth.
So, as a rogue planet scheme that as well could be a useful pattern.
Ending Pending
It has emerged slowly in my mind that indeed Charcoal production could substitute for the Coal needed to make solar panels.
https://www.missionnewenergy.com/solar- … hout-coal/
Quote:
Can You Make Solar Panels Without Coal?
Quote:
Torrefaction
Wood Chips can be used to make solar panels instead of coal?
Wood chips, when converted through a process called torrefaction, can be used as a viable alternative to coal in solar panel production. This process involves heating wood chips in an oxygen-free environment to temperatures between 250 and 350 degrees Celsius for up to 40 minutes at a time. The torrefaction process reduces the biomass of the wood by around 25%, turns it into a charcoal-like substance, and gives it a similar energy density to coal. This makes it a great alternative to coal, especially in forest-rich southern states.
Mission New Energy
+1Mission New Energy
Can You Make Solar Panels Without Coal? 2025 ResearchHidden History Center
Why do we burn coal and trees to make solar panels?View all
Mission New Energy
Can You Make Solar Panels Without Coal? 2025 Research
So can you make solar panels without coal? The answer is yes, but it will take some work. Can Solar Panels Be Made Without Coal? Can we make solar panels without coal? The main ing…
https://www.missionnewenergy.co
A new term: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torrefaction
Quote:
Torrefaction of biomass, e.g., wood or grain, is a mild form of pyrolysis at temperatures typically between 200 and 320 °C. Torrefaction changes biomass properties to provide a better fuel quality for combustion and gasification applications. Torrefaction produces a relatively dry product, which reduces or eliminates its potential for organic decomposition. Torrefaction combined with densification creates an energy-dense fuel carrier of 20 to 21 GJ/ton lower heating value (LHV).[1] Torrefaction causes the material to undergo Maillard reactions. Torrefied biomass can be used as an energy carrier or as a feedstock used in the production of bio-based fuels and chemicals.[2]
Biomass can be an important energy source.[3] However, there exists a large diversity of potential biomass sources, each with its own unique characteristics. To create efficient biomass-to-energy chains, torrefaction of biomass, combined with densification (pelletisation or briquetting), is a promising step towards overcoming the logistical challenges in developing large-scale sustainable energy solutions, by making it easier to transport and store. Pellets or briquettes have higher density, contain less moisture, and are more stable in storage than the biomass they are derived from.
Image Quote: Quote:
Torrefaction removes moisture and volatiles from biomass, leaving bio-coal.
So, in using "Superpower" for Torrefaction, in a brick oven, wood chips and perhaps logs, and weeds can be converted to various products. Obviously it is not desired to create Methane in the atmosphere or particulate pollution.
Combustible gasses could be immediately burned, perhaps in an Ice Engine. And pollution control would be very desired.
Although not generally considered an excellent way to store solar energy, then charcoal is also a possible way to have energy from solar sources when direct sunlight and electric storage are not enough.
The Brick ovens may be used to heat buildings in the winter and also hot water around the year, I presume.
But otherwise it could be used to make solar panels, or it could be added to soils, or injected deeper in deep soils, or added to bogs.
Ending Pending
I like this article; I shows that NASA is coming to accept the finding of evidence of water ice in Candor Chasma. This would help to indicate that NASA may be processing concept updates based on newfound evidence, and so not being stuck in dogma from the 70's or so.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technolo … r-AA1L7rZD Quote:
NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter Just Revealed the Solar System’s Largest Canyon
Story by Jessica Bennett • 23h •
4 min read
Quote:
Mars’ Ancient Environment: Water, Ice, and Climate Shifts
One of the most significant revelations about Candor Chasma comes from recent studies regarding the presence of water beneath the surface. In 2021, the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter, a collaboration between the European Space Agency (ESA) and the Russian space agency, discovered traces of water ice beneath Candor Chasma. This water is thought to be trapped in a permafrost-like state, similar to Earth’s polar regions.This finding suggests that Mars may have had a more Earth-like climate in the distant past, one where liquid water was stable on the surface. In fact, the presence of water in Candor Chasma could mean that up to 40% of the near-surface material in Valles Marineris might be composed of water. This ice could serve as a valuable resource for future missions to Mars, especially if it can be extracted for use by human explorers. It also opens the possibility that Mars could have once supported life, or at least the conditions necessary for microbial life to thrive.
Despite Mars no longer having plate tectonics like Earth, its crust is still quite dynamic. Faulting and fracturing continue to shape its surface, albeit in a different way from Earth’s plate movements. As the planet cools, cracks form in the crust, leading to the development of features like Candor Chasma. These tectonic processes, though less active than Earth’s, are still powerful enough to affect the landscape, contributing to the erosion and warping of sediment layers within the canyon.
The prior vision that emerged from perhaps more early information about Mars seemed to feel that Mars with the exception of the polar ice caps perhaps was a desert planet. I suppose it depends on what you consider to be desert.
Anyway, this information indicates that is a Ice Age Glacier planet.
So, two advantages relative to higher latitude locations and one possible disadvantage.
1) Warmer, and yet having water ice.
2) Perhaps equal to or better radiation protection. The atmosphere is thicker than average, and there are cliffs which may block some radiation.
3) Landing may be a bit tricky though. Not too bad but a bit harder.
Ending Pending
Another factor might be having two warm and cold seasons if you are on the equator. Between the North and South Summers/Winters would be two warm seasons in one Mars year. So the duration of time between one warm and one cold season would be somewhat close to an Earth year.
Mars year, about 687 days, so half of that, then is 343.5 days, pretty close to 365.
Ending Pending
So, this is something like what I am thinking:
I am showing log sections being pushed into a solar heated brick oven. This then to generate Biochar, and combustible gasses.
Of course chipped scrap wood or bundled weeds might be a different shaped chamber.
Where usually you want dry lumber, in this case wet will be just fine and with the bark on.
The brick oven being originally heated with solar power, will not directly combust wood, but will produce biochar and combustible gasses.
The Oven should be able to be heated with Superpower whenever convenient. But it is hoped that when a lack of solar energy exists, and otherwise, the repeated injection of Aspin wood and weeds, could generate enough extra exhaust gasses to run an internal combustion engine, it may be possible to keep the oven warm with the electricity generated.
At times heat from the oven might be used also to heat other things such as habitat or hot water.
Ending Pending
A great hope would be that humanoid robots could reduce the production cost of solar panels and other equipment. This Video has good dialog. The visuals for the most part are typical and not unique, perhaps to protect trade secrets. It is a bit long.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNJJ4H4 … noCreators
Quote:
Tesla Optimus V3.5’s AI Brain: Factory Boosts 91% With Hidden Power (Insiders Confirm It)
Techno Creators
15.1K subscribers
OK, supposing we discover that indeed we need to extract large amounts of CO2 from the atmosphere. First of all it is not likely that most countries will do this unless bad consequences are evident of a sufficient magnitude to prompt it to be done.
I have suggested that some soils could be upgraded by including biochar into them.
But for a massive storage scheme, adding biochar to existing bogs, or even creating new bogs might be a path forward.
This would leave the Carbon available in case the situation changed, such as an Ice Age or some type of technological change.
Bogs can catch on fire if they dry out so you would want to make sure that sufficient water would exist to prevent that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bog
So, a bog keeps most Oxygen away from organic materials, and I think that biochar could be stored in them. This would still allow biological activity on top of the bog.
So, if you had dairy land that had gone feral, you could create biochar, and stuff it into existing bogs or created ones. But as I said you have to have a good water supply to make sure it stays wet.
Should you make Biochar by heating it in a electric brick oven as I have suggested the process would shed lighter Hydrocarbons, which might be burned in an Ice engine. But I won't like there is a possibility of air pollution if it is not done correctly. Things like Tar might be created as well.
I suppose that saltwater bogs could be created if you were near a body of salt water.
Ending Pending
A bit of a reality check then. I suspect that China has been using it as an employment scheme to create jobs.
The robot Olympics suggests that at least some portion of China's robot research is not as great as we would be encouraged to believe. It may be that if humanoid robots can replace human labor in solar technology production, that path will get the cost of production down. I am guessing as I said before that China has wanted to keep as many people in jobs as possible, and obviously they would have liked to be the only producers on the planet.
They will still be able to produce for places in the Global Sun Belt, not including India. But prices will not be going down for a while I expect.
Places like Australia and Pakistan can still buy solar equipment from China, I expect, unless Europe, N. America, or India can do better.
Ending Pending
Isaac Arthur gives another view on what the future of the Moon could be: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yw6uEK5 … saacArthur Quote:
Lunar Industrial Parks - The First Factories Beyond Earth
Isaac Arthur
I like it but he does not include speculation of Lava Tubes.
But that is fine, I am sure there will be a vast amount of ideas that will get tried on the Moon. Some will work out well, some not as well.
Ending Pending
This is not too bad for a presentation: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … ORM=WRVORC
Quote:
There's an Alien World Below Earth's Surface
YouTube
Astrum Earth
240.3K views
I have a copy of David Golds Book: "The Deep Hot Biosphere".
https://www.amazon.com/Deep-Hot-Biosphe … 0387985468
We think that Mars has a underground deep water world in cracks in the rocks, perhaps.
https://www.inverse.com/science/mars-hi … study-nasa
Quote:
Mars Is Likely Hiding Oceans Worth Of Water Deep In Its Crust — This Could Upend Our Plans For the Planet
Miles below the surface, cracks in volcanic rock may be full of liquid water.by Kiona Smith
Aug. 15, 2024
So, I am guessing that any world with enough warmth of a size equal to or less than that of Mars, could have a "Crack Ocean" in its crust.
The Earth seems to have a sort of one, but the gravity squeezes the cracks shut better than Mars can, I expect. And Tectonics might also squeeze the cracks shut in places as well.
So, that makes suspicious Mercury, Luna, Ceres, Vesta, Europa, Ganymede, Callisto, Titan, Enceladus, Triton, Pluto, Eris and other dwarfs and moons.
I only list Mercury because I suppose there is a chance that it had water on it's surface some time a long time ago, very early in the solar systems history. An argument might be made for the Moon Luna, as it did have a atmosphere of sorts at least once.
https://www.nasa.gov/solar-system/an-at … nar-water/ Quote:
An Atmosphere Around the Moon? NASA Research Suggests Significant Atmosphere in Lunar Past and Possible Source of Lunar Water
Quote:
The ancient lunar atmosphere was thicker than the atmosphere of Mars today and was likely capable of weathering rocks and producing windstorms. Perhaps most importantly, it could be a source for some, if not all, of the water detected on the Moon.
Quote:
The short-lived atmosphere — estimated to have lasted approximately 70 million years — was comprised primarily of carbon monoxide, sulfur and water. As volcanic activity declined, the release of the gases also declined. What atmosphere existed was either lost to space or became part of the surface of the Moon.
A crack ocean if it existed, could be deeper than the one that may exist on Mars. The gravity is less and the Moon cooled faster, at least in places perhaps, so, I offer it as a slight possibility.
And Ocean under the ice of Europa, Ceres, Pluto, and Eris might be deep as well. If any surviving briny cold oceans exist on these worlds, the crack ocean in the crust might be warmer, maybe even hot in places.
If this were true for some such worlds, then I see no reason why rogue worlds might have such a thing as well.
In probing for life in such worlds, I think we have to be reasonable. If it is common to exist in such environments, then it is not necessarily more important than the survival of the human race. And greatest caution should be to protect humans from it.
But I agree with Dr. Robert Zubrin, probably these organisms would not be tuned to prey on humans. But we might not want to introduce them to the Earth deep biosphere.
And what organisms we might introduce to such worlds probably cannot infect the deep biospheres of those worlds to the extent of causing extinction.
We need to be careful of the people farmers, who use things similar to Climate Politics to extract wealth from the population of humans. People who want to featherbed their lives in white collar positions.
Such people are the ones who might seek to establish an estate of power and control over the populations by establishing a negative view of human, and so to justify their right to control us. Such claims say that they want to keep humans from harming innocent aliens. But no, like any fit parasite, they need to keep their captive peoples weak so the better to eat them alive.
They sting you, removing your will, and ability to rebel and they drag you into a dark hole where they or their magot children can eat you slowly.
We should say "NO!" and do it with force if need be. Rape is not nice, and neither is what they do.
Ending Pending
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technolo … r-AA1L5g8t Quote:
The Glaciers On Mars' Surface Might Not Be What We Thought
Story by Nicolae Bochis • 1h •
3 min read
Another affirmation of good (80%) glacier ice in many places on Mars.
Ending Pending
So, now I am satisfied that the Earth does not have infinite resilience as per additional contribution of CO2 and other greenhouse gasses to the atmosphere, but it has an increasing amount of heat rejection for each additional increment increase of CO2 or perhaps other greenhouse gasses.
But I have been working on sequestering Carbon in conjunction with solar power installations.
I do not speak Spanish, but I like the illustration: https://solarplacas.es/bifacial-vertical-solar-panels/
Image Quote:
I would mount them on vertical wooden posts instead. kdb512 has pointed out that it is not just solar panels that consume energy to produce, you also have to produce the methods to mount the panels.
For the moment I am entertaining Aspin Trees. Tony Seba has said that solar panels are getting so cost effective that making fences from them can be economic. Vertical may reduce trouble with snow accumulations. While vertical bifacial (East<>West facing), may not capture as much energy during the day, it captures it more evenly with morning and afternoon peak energy, not so much at noon. This then reduces battery storage needs.
Aspin Tree wood to mount the panels on: https://fity.club/lists/q/quaking-aspen-tree/
Quote:
A little bit about Aspin wood: https://www.woodmagazine.com/materials- … es-1/aspen
Quote:
Aspen, due to sheer quantity alone, supports much of the logging industry across the Great Lakes states and Canada. Abundant because it propagates and grows rapidly in areas cleared by fire or harvest, aspen has many commercial uses. You'll find it in furniture, toothpicks, matchsticks, boxes and crates, paneling, and chipboard. And, this plentiful tree has been a popular source for paper pulp since the late 1940s.
I am not a carpenter or a farmer, so I do not know all the tricks for fence posts to be made from Aspin, but I think it might work. Methods to retard decay would likely be wanted, but with lots of trees robots could probably move the panels to new sets of posts over the lifetime of the solar panels if needed.
If trends continue, then solar panels at 37% efficiency and a reasonable cost may exist in perhaps 10 years. So, if solar panels with optimal south facing installations with panels 20% to 25% efficiency, make sense now, in 10 year the ones with 37% should do very nicely if mounted vertical east to west bifacial.
If you look up "Superpower" and Tony Seba: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … &FORM=VIRE
So, one of the things you could do with "Superpower", is to heat up a brick oven of large size, and to use the heat of that oven to create Biochar, to spread onto land or inject into soil or put into bogs. The gasses emitted could be used to run an internal combustion engine perhaps with a generator.
So, if you cut down Aspens, you could make fence posts for solar and also make Biochar out of the scrap branches and wood.
In places like the "Rust Belt", Canada, and Alaska this may work. In the "Rust Belt" around the Great Lakes, perhaps 6 months have very good solar and the 6 not as good.
In this reference monthly solar energy are shown: https://www.nrel.gov/gis/solar-resource-maps
April though September look rather good. So, in those months construction and the creation of Biochar might make sense. In the other months the heat stored in the brick oven could be used to heat dwellings, perhaps.
Not only would scrap could be made into biochar, but also various weed plants that robots could harvest.
I am thinking that it might make sense to move populations North<>South to follow the energy production.
When the population bulged in the warm season in the North then water resources could be used, then when the propulsion moved South those water resources could be used. Robots and Electric cars could follow the power surge and its dwindling North<>South, to make most efficient use of resources.
Some people would stay in the North however, but because other people went South, they would have more space to themselves when many may not want to go outdoors as much.
Perhaps a more formalize method of Snow birding.
But the method would better utilize solar resources and spread resource burden on things like water.
This might make more sense than moving electricity north from the south or water south from the north (Which the north would not permit anyway).
With many humans gone north for the warm season then water resources in the Southwest for instance might be devoted to agriculture, and Southwest superpower would be used to extract water from the sea perhaps.
You have to keep in mind that nearly all work will be done by robots in the future, it seems, so people will not be as rooted to a certain location in the country. Canada would probably do well to make such an arrangement somehow.
A possible thing to do would be to establish financial incentives for people who will be willing to participate in snow birding, as such snow birding might be economically beneficial to our country.
Ending Pending
Thinking on rogue objects, dust clouds, and Oort Clouds.
Our terminology is actually rather strange. We call things that orbit something we call stars "Planets".
Objects that orbit planets, we call "Moons".
However, if we wanted to we might call the Universe the primary object, and Galaxies be called Secondary.
We might call things that orbit the Galaxy center Tertiary objects. This would include Stars, Black Holes, White Dwarfs, Brown Dwarfs, and Rogue Planets. But any of these Tertiary objects would be the Fourth level. Earth would be Fourth Level. Our Moon would be Fifth Level. And any satellites of a Fifth Level object would be Sixth Level.
And I guess I don't know where to place Trojan Objects.
Really every object in the Universe is Rogue. But we reserve Rogue for two types of objects.
1) Ejected Objects.
2) Condensed Objects smaller than a Brown Dwarf. However, how small is the smallest brown dwarf?
As far as I can tell, vast amounts of gas, much of it Hydrogen, somehow are conducted into our galaxy. Some larger objects can accrete it if they have enough gravity and do not shine so bright and have a solar wind that will push it away.
Stars that explode and objects that collide create dust clouds of materials cooked up in objects that have processed Hydrogen and Helium using fusion.
I think it is very hard for our sun to accrete materials such as dust from outside the solar system as sunlight and the solar wind will push it away. It could accrete a interstellar comet or larger object, if that object collided with the sun.
But it seems that interstellar dust clouds can overcome the repulsive forces of the sun, Photons and the Solar wind, and intrude even on the Earth at times.
https://www.universetoday.com/articles/ … lar-clouds Quote:
What Happens to the Climate When Earth Passes Through Interstellar Clouds?
By mark-thompson - September 23, 2024 at 7:29 PM UTC | Planetary Science
Quote:
A team of astronomers let by Jess A. Miller from the Department of Astronomy of Boston University have traced the path of the Sun back through time. In doing so, they have identified two occasions when the Earth and Solar System passed through two dense interstellar clouds. One of the crossings occurred 2 million years ago, the other 7 million years ago. Exploring the properties of the clouds, the team assert that the clouds are dense enough that they could compress the solar wind to inside the orbit of Earth.
The Solar Wind is a constant stream of charged particles, mostly electrons and protons that are emitted from the upper layer of the Sun's atmosphere, the corona. The particles travel through the Solar System at speeds between 400 and 800 kilometres per second. The edge of our Solar System is defined as the point where the solar wind merges with the interstellar medium.
Image Quote:
So, if this is true, then objects such as the Earth and in higher orbits of the sun from the Earth could accrete Dust and even Hydrogen and Helium, if their gravity is large enough and any magnetic field does not interfere. (I don't know what goes on with magnetic fields in this event).
It is possible that objects equal to and larger than Mars could accrete both dust and Hydrogen, and Helium, particularly if they are further out in the colder reaches of the solar system. If Mars collected Hydrogen and Helium, I think it would lose it quickly because of the Sun's Photons.
But in the Kuiper Belt and Oort Cloud, objects equal to or greater than Mars in Mass might accrete both dust and gasses. Objects smaller than Mars might accrete dust and condensed ices.
I see a possibility here that a world like Eris could accrete new radioactive fission fuels from dust clouds:
https://www.swri.org/newsroom/press-rel … rf-planets
Quote:
SwRI scientists find evidence of geothermal activity within icy dwarf planets
February 15, 2024 — A team co-led by Southwest Research Institute found evidence for hydrothermal or metamorphic activity within the icy dwarf planets Eris and Makemake, located in the Kuiper Belt. Methane detected on their surfaces has the tell-tale signs of warm or even hot geochemistry in their rocky cores, which is markedly different than the signature of methane from a comet.
Quote:
Recent studies have shown that Eris shows signs of geological activity, indicating that it may have internal geochemical processes.
Evidence of hydrothermal or metamorphic activity has been found within Eris, suggesting warm or hot geochemistry in its rocky core.
1
The James Webb Space Telescope has detected methane on Eris's surface, which is indicative of recent geological activity, challenging previous notions of these icy worlds as cold and inert.
2
So, I speculate that these worlds could periodically accrete more radioactive materials that might come from star explosions, and maybe from object collisions.
There is some thinking that Europa has plate tectonics in its ice shell: https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/scientist … on-europa/ Quote:
Scientists Find Evidence of 'Diving' Tectonic Plates on Europa
Sept. 8, 2014
So, I speculate that Eris may have an ocean and ice plate tectonics, that would allow further accretions of interstellar dust to be conducted to the bottom of such an ocean, and so it speculate that such worlds may be powered by the energy compressed into radioactive substances by exploding stars.
And I suppose I might speculate that a world with an ice-covered ocean with plate tectonics might also host rock tectonics below that allowing radioactive materials to accrete into the core of the object.
https://eos.org/articles/dwarf-planets- … c-activity
Quote:
Instead, the deuterium-hydrogen ratio is a close match to that found in comet water ice. That suggests the methane on Eris and Makemake inherited its hydrogen from water in the interior, where conditions could have been hot enough for water and carbon molecules to react, forming methane.
The deuterium-hydrogen ratio doesn’t reveal when the methane reached the surface, however. But NIRSpec also measured the carbon isotopes in the methane. It found that carbon-13 was only about 1% as abundant as carbon-12. If the methane were old, the carbon-13 would be much more abundant, Glein said.
So, I think over time there have been repeated surprises when worlds are examined and expected to be very cold but show evidence of greater internal warmth.
So, now I have to ask about worlds around Brown Dwarfs and Jumbo's. These are thought to be condensed, and not usually ejected from the domain of other stars.
Can they have planets, a Kuiper Belt, and an Oort Cloud?
Could they have planets that would be as big or bigger than Eris? Would those worlds perhaps be able to periodically accrete dust from interstellar clouds, dust with radioactive content?
Could they support worlds with oceans and some type of tectonics?
If so, then I would call these objects "Fuzzy". If I can presume that they have lots of comets. They would only have radiated heat for a relatively short time to drive the snow line outward. Perhaps they are full of comets, and Dwarf Planets, and maybe even Steppenwolf planets orbiting them.
Being "Fluffy", I would wonder about the merger of a Jumbo planets Oort Cloud (If it has one), with the Oort Cloud of our solar system. Would this represent a sort of collision of Hill Spheres, with exchange of objects?
One view of how Triton could have been captured by Neptune is that it may have had a partner object, and that partner was either absorbed by Neptune or that partner object was cast away, allowing Neptune to capture Titan. So, that was a sort of "Fluffy" capture.
Could a Hill Sphere capture a larger object in the event of a "Fluffy" collision, while the major object would get cast away.
For instance if a Jumbo resembling and oversized Jupiter, have a "Fluffy" interaction with our solar system and perhaps leave a moon, or take some comets, or maybe even a Dwarf Planet?
Anyway, I got that out of my head. Perhaps I can do other things now.
Smile.
Ending Pending
OK, in my efforts to humiliate myself I will continue. You have to continue or you don't solve.
The critical word is "Tropopause". This is the layer where greenhouse gasses convert vibration to emissions of photons that can pass into space.
The greater gasses are Water Vapor, CO2, and Methane, and some others.
Of these Water Vapor is the only one that appears to be able to condense. It is also the one that can float upward in other gasses if it has sufficient concentration and does not condense. So, it moves heat up and cold down though the vertical travel, as well as to emit photons, particularly when it condenses.
So, I guess Sabine Hossenfelder could be largely correct to say that adding CO2 to the atmosphere raises the altitude at which photons are emitted to space from the troposphere.
The notion that I also held that CO2 could saturate, is not as easy to defend. The Masking Tape idea where light dims for each additional layer of masking tape might fall apart as it is only the top layer of masking tape that can emit photons into space, according to the Tropopause notion. Below the tropopause the greenhouse molecules are pitching photons like balls and there are enough other greenhouse molecules to catch those molecules before they are emitted into space.
However, as I have mentioned I think water vapor plays the game a bit differently as it can condense and fall. So I can do a partial buy-in on the Tropopause model for CO2. And of course, vapors condensing makes clouds which have variable effects per heat rejection or retention.
But the Tropopause is variable, being higher at the equator and lower at the poles.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tropopause
Image Quote:
Quote:
The tropopause is the atmospheric boundary that demarcates the lowest two layers of the atmosphere of Earth – the troposphere and stratosphere – which occurs approximately 17 kilometres (11 mi) above the equatorial regions, and approximately 9 kilometres (5.6 mi) above the polar regions.[1]
So, the thermal limiting factor is the relative abundance of greenhouse molecules pitching photons upward from below, to the relative lack of greenhouse molecules above the troposphere which could catch them and pitch them back down.
(Sort of).
But the altitude of the troposphere, determines the density of the atmosphere where the troposphere is, and if a greenhouse gas is uniformly mixed by wind stirring, then the troposphere at the equator is thinner than at the poles and the amount of CO2 above the troposphere will be less at the equator than the poles.
But for a greenhouse gas that can condensed, to a liquid or solid that may fall, the amount of water vapor should reduce with cold.
So, I would argue that the amount of heating from an additional unit of CO2, will be less and less for each unit, as the troposphere will rise up to thinner and thinner layers of atmosphere where if CO2 is a constant portion of the mixture of atmosphere, it must be less in number of molecules above the troposphere.
So, I still argue that the temperature rise will not be linear and will be increasingly limited on a per unit of CO2 as the total number of molecules above the troposphere reduces with altitude.
But for water the story is not the same. The hotter the ocean the more evaporation. Then the formation of clouds changes things a lot both to cool and to warm in various cases. But the concentration is not uniform in the atmosphere, so then greater amounts of water vapor in a patch of air, displaces other molecules that are heavier, so then that patch of humidified air may rise, and it it gets to an open enough sky it will condense and tend to fall back down to the ocean.
So, the hotter the ocean the more evaporative cooling it will get because the sky is always up there somewhere to dry the air out by condensing the water vapor to liquids and solids.
So, again the attempt to heat will not lead to a linear rise in temperatures. The more heat in the oceans the higher the rate of heat loss.
I feel that I have a better understanding. But still, protecting a worthwhile path for the human race forward is more important than dealing with a more tropical Earth.
And I think I have come up with a practical way to sequester Carbon if that becomes necessary and if the predictions of RethinkX and Tony Seba are correct.
Ending Pending
But of course surface temperatures can rise. I accept that.
I think that unless fusion rocket propulsion proves better, a sensible thing might be to add a 3rd stage to Starship, and to also utilize electric rocket propulsion to communicate mass between LEO and Earth Geosynchronous Orbit. And there could be very large platforms up there even eventually a ring. The large platforms could be in part made from Starships.
That is one possible path.
Ending Pending
From the previous post, in the video at the start of the post, Sabine Hossenfelder indicates that the more CO2 in the atmosphere, the higher in the atmosphere is the material from which certain frequencies of Infared are emitted into space. I don't really know if I can have what I need to combat that claim. So, she claims part of the vertical, but I will work with the Horizontal+Vertical.
Average of the Continental Height?
https://quizlet.com/153483486/oceanogra … ash-cards/
Quote:
approximately 840 meters (2,756 feet)
The average height of the continents above sea level is approximately 840 meters (2,756 feet). This average takes into account the highest mountains and deepest valleys across all landmasses on Earth.
Quizlet
+1
How low was the Sea Level during the last Ice Age?
https://vividmaps.com/coastlines-of-ice-age/
Quote:
About 125 meters
During the last ice age, which occurred about 21 thousand years ago, sea levels were about 125 meters (410 feet) below the present. At the peak of the last ice age, which occurred about 40,000 years ago, sea level was at least 100 meters below where it is today. With so much of the planet's water tied up in ice, global sea level was more than 400 feet lower than it is today.
Vivid Maps
+2
How much extra land area existed during the last ice age?
https://brilliantmaps.com/ice-age-map/
Quote:
25%
During the Last Glacial Maximum, approximately 26,000 to 19,000 years ago, glaciers covered about 8% of Earth's surface, which is equivalent to 25% of the total land area. This period saw significant portions of the Earth's surface exposed due to lower sea levels, with glaciers extending across continents like Canada, Scandinavia, and parts of Asia.
Brilliant Maps
+2
Image Quote:
I will to some extent be considering "Atmospheric Displacement".
How high is the troposphere, where most weather occurs?
How much mass of atmosphere is over oceans vs. land?
How fluffy is the atmosphere? More heat or altitude causes more porosity.
Pause............
In times of greater differential of elevation, between land and sea, more of the existing CO2 in the atmosphere will exist over the seas than it would if the difference was less.
But during an ice age it is likely that total CO2 amount will be less. Rivers that run under ice sheets and the glaciers themselves can fertilize the ocean which might cause plankton to absorb more of the CO2.
If we come to the last 200 years, the land to sea elevation difference is less than in an ice age. If the atmosphere heats up by any means, then a greater mass of atmosphere will be displaced to be over land than was the case during the ice age. So, the air above the seas will be fluffier, that is because of greater molecular vibrations. This will also cause CO2 in the atmosphere to be displace from above the sea to above land.
While tropical seas can cool themselves off by fluid circulation in the air and water, also then can seek the cold of the sky by vertical convection and also evaporative cooling with a point towards the upper limits of the troposphere were, water vapor will condense into rain, snow, or hail.
If you elevate the condensation level, then less atmosphere and CO2 are above it.
Pause.....
I cannot know if a fluffier atmosphere layer will allow more photons though it or block them. But if the seas heat up they can make the atmosphere above them fluffier, and displace atmosphere and CO2 from above the seas and to be over the land masses.
Does the energy of a photon pass between molecules or be passed from molecule to molecule. Some of each, I think.
I think I want to sleep on this before continuing.....Next Post perhaps.......
I think that he is correct that we should be thinking about what to do if we are contacted.
If it were an alien probe, it certainly would not be a stealthy way to take control of the solar system. However, if the galaxy is in a "Dark Forest", situation, they might try to discover if we would be friend or foe. Being obvious, but not sending out radio signals that predator aliens could detect.
A true predator would very likely give us technology such as AI and Robots, without exposing themselves, then at some point seize control of our AI and Robots. They might do a silly display of UFO's and stuff in such a way as to discredit those making claims of Aliens. Sort of a hidden trojan horse.
Some people would say there were Greeks spotted, but the Greeks might cause some ridiculous stories to emerge, so that if Greeks were actually detected by someone, that story also would be discredited.
However, in our case we are not yet a threat in the interstellar or even in our solar system. It is extremely unlikely in my opinion that they would want our stuff. They can find stuff all over the universe. And if they wanted to eat us, then they could just take samples and farm humans somewhere. Of course, I don't think that they would even think that was worth anything to them.
They might be interested to see if we could become a threat, and they might want to let us know that we should mind our p's and q's.
But that is not likely to be the case here, but it is good to rehearse the potential, to some extent so we can develop thinking about these things.
Ending Pending
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technolo … r-AA1KWich
Quote:
The hidden caves under the moon’s surface
Story by Alexander Clark • 1d •
5 min read
On the one hand they try to establish an estate of control, not quite saying that humans are dirty rabble, and morality may require control of human access to the caves. This is a typical ploy of environmentalism. It is a method to seize control of a property, for those who would control it. Typically, it is associated with elitism. It is not entirely wrong, in my opinion. If a property is assigned to a Stewart of good character, then that property might be protected by a good Stewart. But we need to consider if it is simply an instinctive or psychopathic desire to stifle the potential progress of a people who may potentially progress.
Sexual Selfishness is like this; I think that a lot of popular morality is just efforts by instinctive or psychopathic desire to thwart competition from rival genetic patterns.
But I think these caves could best be explored with robots, so we do not have to put humans into them unless it is useful to do so.
Perhaps in some cases, they can be developed for protection of robots or even in a few places humans.
Ending Pending