New Mars Forums

Official discussion forum of The Mars Society and MarsNews.com

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Announcement: This forum is accepting new registrations via email. Please see Recruiting Topic for additional information. Write newmarsmember[at_symbol]gmail.com.
  1. Index
  2. » Search
  3. » Posts by Grypd

#701 Re: Space Policy » Chinese Space Program? - What if they get there first » 2005-08-19 03:42:44

I suppose you are right. At the Moment China lacks the tech to Go to Mars. But I do however wish to point out that China will get there before any other Earth Nation.

The USA has a little stumbling block to its move to Mars. Government Must approve the expense. At twenty billion per person (Initial. Not including resupply) it is beyond the ability of any nation that does not value the Colonization of Space (or Mars) in its ability to support Human life.

About the best the private sector can hope  is that the Big red Martian moon is a ball of Nickle-Iron that can be processed in near Zero-G by an unmanned Orbital Platform. A couple of Cubic Kilometres of Ni-Fe in Space, in a stable orbit, Should be good for: The outer Hull of a very big Space Vehicle?

Actually for the Martian Moons I hope they are chondrites. This basically means they are fuel stops for a colonisation effort in effect Mars central space refueling stations. A Colonisation effort to Mars is out of the question right now but when we can get the cost of flights to space reduced this will not allways be the case.

You use the figure of 20$billion a person to Mars but that is with the current launch technology and I assume a lot of supplies in that figure. But the day will come when we have a lunar base able to supply to GEO and the need to send a lot of people to earth orbit. When that happens we will see the development of space planes probably TSTO at first but since they are all reusable this will give a major reduction in the cost of getting to space. If we also use cyclers to transport people and infrastructure that is 100% reusable then we will find costs for a colonisation effort reducing dramatically down to about $200,000 a person sent to Mars at first and costs will keep reducing.

The costs will reduce when we have indigenous NIMF craft able to leave Mars to go to the fuel station where there will be a transport fueled by the water in either Deimos or Phobos to catch up to a cycler coming close and to take the passengers back to the Moon and transported down in the NIMF. On arrival in Mars previous settlers and crews will have established a place for these settlers to be housed and fed until they go to there new homes.

#702 Re: Martian Politics and Economy » Selectionism - An Ideology for Martian Settlement » 2005-08-18 16:37:30

Great Britain has an amusing legislature _and_ monarch. But again, it functions because it’s a republic.

No it's not...

Yes, it is.

No its not.

A republic is a society where each citizen actually owns a share of the goverment and anyone has the chance of leading the country. Great Britain is a constitutional Monarchy but it still is a Monarchy. In a republic the citizens and soldiers swear to defend the country and the rights of the people. In a constitutional Monarchy the Monarch owns everything the Army serve her, the goverment are there to run the country for her. A citizen of such a country only has as much rights as the Monarch has allowed. An example for the prime minister of Britain is that he must ask the Queens permission to form a goverment.

It is never going to happen but the Monarch can allways rule the country directly.

#703 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Thermal Protection » 2005-08-18 16:11:48

Over here in Scotland a private research organisation conducted a lot of research into what was called Waveriders. They used the Shockwave and where able to enter at a much steeper descent. Most designs where variations of slightly rounded triangles.

#704 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Lets walk before we run - Moon first » 2005-08-18 16:06:11

A lot can be done by control from Earth as long as we have some people there. We are getting more and more practice with the use of Telerobotics and with only a small delay of 4 seconds to the Moon, that is nothing.

Certainly I think base infrastructure should be one of the Jobs that Telerobots should do. People we send to the Moon have a lot more important jobs.

#705 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Magnetic Launching Points » 2005-08-18 16:01:27

A lunar mass driver has been envisaged for a long time and there are quite a few plans for its use. There are benefits to a lunar mass driver as it can use the abundant power from the sun to power the driver. Still there are problems.

1) A lunar mass driver will need materials that only high technology ie Earth can make so these materials must be delivered from the Earth. But a lot of the structure can be made from the indigenous Lunar materials.

2) Aiming will rely on when the Moon is in the right position

3) Mass Driving materials is a very high acceleration mission if we need to send people we will need a long track. Probabily the better method is to use indigenous aluminium prepared with Oxygen to make rocket fuel to get people off the Moon with materials and exports sent by the driver.

4) And finally most of the materials are high tech and will have to come from the Earth anyway so you save very little in the way of delta V. But if there was a larger size industrial capacity that a big prescence on the Moon this would be less of a problem so for intial Mars plans it is impractical.

Though if you want a bit way out option for a Mass driver capture an asteroid fire of parts of it from the mass driver you set up and travel using that. A long trip but it would work.

#706 Re: Space Policy » Chinese Space Program? - What if they get there first » 2005-08-17 03:54:48

So Red China on Red Mars not so much of a threat now.

You cant possibly draw that conclusion. The point of an unmanned Sample Vehicle is so you can send people on some other mission. If they have decided the moon is just an unmanned task, The colonization of Mars before any one else, could well be the entire focus of the Chinese Space Program.

Yes but it is the length between the misions that indicates that the Chinese do not have the capabilities or the money to spend. China is an expanding economy actually a very fast expanding economy and with also the build up of the Chinese military potential then there is a lot of pressure to where to spend the Yuan. Also in terms of resources both people and materials the Chinese space program will lose out to more immediate problems. Certainly China does not have the engineers and hi tech materials to do everything at once and so these engineers are placed where they are best needed. With the build up of Chinas aerospace industries these engineers will flock to these factories and design bureaus. With the build up of the Chinese military then they will need people to understand these new missiles and to develop them.

In short no China is not going straight to Mars there is no sign of the incredible Heavy lift needed and without the use of lunar materials or asteroidal materials and fuels there is no way China or anyone else can build a big enough space infrastructure to actually send colonists to Mars.

#707 Re: Not So Free Chat » Race and Culture - A Changing Europe - Opening a mighty can of worms... » 2005-08-16 19:01:57

European countries do have a problem in there population demographics. Some countries have actually done something about this. The prime example is France which if anything is bucking the trend and has actually a growing population and this is put down to its 35 hour week and family friendly policies. The trouble being that it seems to make France very uncompetitive with the world.

In october Germany is going to the poles for there general election. The current administration is running far behind what is a more right wing party and this right wing parties main policies are primarily family based with the intention of making it easier to have a family and still have a career. Actually the plan is to loosen up the economic situation in Germany and to actually allow Germany to become the European powerhouse it once was.

The EU though has expanded and the newer states unlike the more staid original countries are places where population growth is reasonably high. The UK for example has used the higher free population of countries like Poland to supply the worker shortage the expanding economy of the UK has short. In the last 9 months over 1,032,000 Poles and other Eastern Europeans attracted by the high wages have moved to Britain and taken up Jobs. Though it is an economic migration very few of these people plan to actually stay instead they will spend a while here making savings while working then go home and use those to start buisnesses or get married.

We in the west do not need to "breed like rabbits" that would be totally unnecessary but that we should provide laws to allow people to work and still have a larger family. There should be tax breaks and benefits to having more than one child. Just making it seem to better for the country to have more children and to put this through education would be a start.

Immigration into a country is not a problem as long as that immigration is measured by the people coming in being able to be absorbed and accepted into that countries culture. Immigration is a good thing especially for the richer countries that can afford to hire the best brains and those immigrants naturally want to take there families with them. The current situation of these eastern EU countries having there young over working in the UK for example benefits both countries. The UK gets jobs done and with posts being filled wages do not have to go up to get people to fill the skills shortages, This boosts the UK economy and stabilises inflationry pressures making the UK more competitive and since they are working they are paying taxes into the national excheguer. Countries like Poland get there young on good wages and money flowing into Poland and with that an Economic boost. This is used to pay for goods and services in Poland and allows Poland to modernise its infrastructure and in the future getting trained people back. Though some will stay in the UK .

#708 Re: Not So Free Chat » Justify your existance » 2005-08-16 16:04:19

I oppose the space commonwealth with every fibre of my being

tongue

#709 Re: Space Policy » Chinese Space Program? - What if they get there first » 2005-08-16 16:01:13

Well the Chinese plan to do there first Lunar probe mission in about 2011 and with the intention of an actual robotic landing and sample return about 2017.

Xinhua news article

I would have thought that China could have done missions of this caliber a lot faster than it plans to do so. Especially with the equipment transfers it has recieved from the Russians and the general increase in technology it is getting. This indicates that there is a lot less funds available than we have previously assumed especially after we remember that the Chinese with there lower base costs can stretch there program a lot.

So Red China on Red Mars not so much of a threat now.

#710 Re: Not So Free Chat » Political Potpourri VIII » 2005-08-15 17:56:11

There's technically a US Commonwealth already, consisting of the USA proper, Puerto Rico, Guam, and a host of other little islands.  I could see us with a few additions, but I'm not sure Tuvalu's worth open warfare at this juncture.  Perhaps the British could swap us something?

Well Tuvalu is an independent country now but with the same head of state as Britain. It is part of the commonwealth but so is Canada, Australia and since Commonwealth countries provide very dood basing for the USA not to mention those that are still British colonies. I doubt the USA objects to its Ascencion Island base or even the base on Diego Garcia.

Your joking of course about Tuvalu being poor have you worked out since Tuvalu is the only country with t and v in its name its computer domain name is TV. I know it has already lent the name out for 5 years for $50 million but that deal ends next year and the likehood is that the fight for that domain rights is going to cost the purchaser to lease for the next 5 at least $250 million. One other thing is that Tuvalu has the international prefix code 900 and they are making money from that. For a countries whose population is just over 10000 thats guite good. Of course they are in deep doodah if global warming continues with the likehood of the nation disapearing for all time. But with a growing trust fund to ensure there population can do well heres hoping for the best for them.

ps due to an agreement and Tuvalus location the US is paying to use there waters something to do with the very extensive fishing.

#711 Re: Human missions » The Case for a Small CEV » 2005-08-15 17:15:54

Ah!  Bob's plan gives up the dream HLV.  Got it.   8)

It does a bit more than that it actually will put the crews sent to the Moon at more risk. Though I would prefer different the crews will arrive with nothing prepared before-hand so they will need to take every thing with them to make there habitats and to actually start there mission. If though they are sent in a lot smaller craft they have to make extremely sure that they land close to there supplies. If they make a navigational error on the way down and find themselves too far from the supplies this could prove a problem. (the sun playing up even when its supposed to be quiet etc etc). With the lack of an automated triangulation system and our very poor maps of the Moon (they are give or take a 100km in some places, the poles for instance) this could easily happen.

Im not sure why Bob dislikes the NASA plan to actually have a rendezvous before they send equipment maybe he just dislikes the whole idea of rendezvous in the first place. We already know his opinion of the Moon and maybe this is just an attempt to simply get the Moon part of the NASA plan to be treated as a joke and to concentrate on Mars. If that is the case though it is likely if this actually occurs then it will also put a hammer blow to NASA eventually going to Mars. With statements "but all we did was another blasted Apollo lots of pictures nothing else and so why go to Mars to do the same". Nope I would be circumspect about the reasons "Honest Bob" has put the statement out.

#712 Re: Not So Free Chat » Political Potpourri VIII » 2005-08-15 13:43:12

Not a commonwealth more like a confederation of independent states. Probably go by the name of the New Anglian Confederation or something like that.

#713 Re: Mars Society International » Woodstock of Mars » 2005-08-15 13:35:58

Though the interesting bit for me was the challenge put out to colleges to create a telerobotic exploration rover for use on Mars. It would obviously have a time delay loop so that the distance control from Earth could be accurately replaced and the robot tested.

I dont think the Mars society has lost its way I just think we are on the verge of progressing somewhere and we want to take the first step. I suspect that a lot of people where expecting the new rocket architecture to be announced and were disapointed that it was not. Nothing like eager anticipation to be dashed to put a small downer on things but think of the arquements that would have livened the confrence up if it had been announced.

#714 Re: Mars Society International » Woodstock of Mars » 2005-08-15 08:15:30

SpaceReview Article

Tom Hill attended the conference and described it as a less big than previous conferences with only 4 splinter talks. He apparently enjoyed the conference but felt that with NASA back in space and the first private spaceflights that the Mars society had lost its way.

#715 Re: Human missions » Against the Human Exploration of Mars if Everyone can't go. » 2005-08-14 15:43:12

this is the domain of independent tests and the ability for continous testing and whole year marks to show what a candidate is truly worth.

Not a hundred percent accurate but then again what is in this world

#716 Re: Human missions » Against the Human Exploration of Mars if Everyone can't go. » 2005-08-14 14:18:38

Basic education is the right of every citizen this is the benefit of an advanced society giving its citizens a chance to be what they can be. But citizens are not equal some people are brighter than the others and this will always be the case. But should we reduce the quality of the higher educations provided by colleges and universities so that everyone has a chance to graduate. NO this would simply make the graduation and the certificates worthless.

So a secondary education is something that should be available to those who have the ability but not the cash but it should be that there ability gives them the chance. In space we should send our best this is so that we can gain the most out of what is an expensive proposition and that is why the best are needed. Everyone should have a chance to be that astronaut but they should have to fight the competition to be that astronaut. When space becomes cheaper it has to be noted more people can go but they will still have to fight for that space and prove they are worthy of the chalenge.

#717 Re: Space Policy » Chinese Space Program? - What if they get there first » 2005-08-14 14:00:25

I suspect the Chinese space program is not what is causeing the USA concern. The Chinese are renovating an ex Soviet Aircraft Carrier. The political meaning for this is obvious. To dominate the area around China and this includes the islands of Taiwan and even Japan aircraft from mainland China is all that is needed but an aircraft carrier only is for the use of force presentation. This will give China a chance to increase its prescence in the Pacific. This is not a great concern unless China begins to build its own indigenous fleet of Carriers where this ex soviet one will give them experience in such operations.

And as a further aside the Chinese PRN have already built there own class of anti aircraft/missile aegis class of cruisers. And certainly it has built or given orders to build more than is necassary to protect the current PRN's naval strength.

#718 Re: Human missions » Against the Human Exploration of Mars if Everyone can't go. » 2005-08-12 16:41:32

So you want us to send incredibly massive spacecraft filled with thousands of people just to have a look around mars.

NOT GOING TO HAPPEN and anybody with common sense will tell you why still it is a laudible goal but we can only send a few people to look around for us first and hopefully learn enough to prepare the way for the eventual colonisation of Earths sister.

#719 Re: Not So Free Chat » Political Potpourri VIII » 2005-08-12 16:37:05

Definition of an Empire,

A large multi ethnic state ruled from a single center. Most often created by cooercion but to be successful must be able to get the various states that form its makeup to want to be part of the Empire.

The Achaemenid Persians where a succesful Empire they managed to keep the various minorities in there Empire reasonably happy. They fell to a military genius and where subsumed.

The Alexandrian Empire was not succesful it managed to cooerce many nations under it but fell apart and disintegrated when the central leadership failed.

The Chinese where a sucessful empire but though a strong central authority dominated and surviving military invasions they eventually disintegrated under internal pressures that weakened them

The Romans again where an empire that was succesful but fell to internal weakening and to being destroyed by outside pressures.

The Spanish Empire was succesful but wracked by internal pressures it collapsed

The British Empire was succesful but weakened after fighting other emerging empires internal pressures made it collapse.

Now America stands at the door of becoming an Empire it has cooerced other ethnic societies into its control but has yet to state it is an Empire. But if you see the trend of the ages you will see that the main cause of the failure of these Empires is always an internal failure and unless conquered by a more powerful force it is this that will make an Empire collapse.

America is an Empire but it has competitors and it has internal pressures. One of the greatest is that it struggles with the term imperialism. Empires are not necassarily a bad thing they spread new inventions and generally ensure there citizens a chance to have a good life. They do bad things too but it is often outweighed by the good they do.

At the moment the USA is not a state that is going to collapse but there are pressures that could do it. It is time for the USA to accept what it is and gird itself to the struggle that is keeping an Empire going.

#720 Re: Not So Free Chat » U.S. Culture - ...where's it going? » 2005-08-10 13:19:38

*Sorry, but that -does- sound like we're selfish and materialistic.  There are many people and things I do care deeply about; the sentiment is seldom returned.  I think America's biggest problem is an attitude of ingratitude for the good standard of living and opportunities we have.  Most folks who are well-off are too good for their "inferiors"...many minimum-wage workers are "too good" for that job (though many of them don't seek to better themselves).  The nation is so overloaded with hype and image and spin...how many people are actually stopping to think for a moment?  Go into a grocery store:  Radio broadcasts or music.  Go into a multimedia store:  TVs blaring, advertisements playing.  Etc., etc.

I wish this was just a lot of problems the USA has. But its not. In the UK we have a welfare state but what this basically means is we have a large percentage of the population who rather than working would rather recieve there Welfare checks and moan how little they are. It is not as if there is not work for them to do. We have in the UK a situation where there is a serious skill and job shortage. We have more jobs than people to fill them. If you read the changing face of Europe post and our little stint into EU politics you will see that the Uk has had a lot of people move to work in the UK from the new EU states in the east.

Well you would expect that this would bring a bout of racist behaviour.

Actually we are seeing these people from Europe appearing and taking jobs that could not be filled and pay there way. They have increased the Scottish economy by a whole 1% in the year they have been here. They are working as nurses, Bricklayers,plumbers all posts we are short in and are putting money into the UK economy.

What this tells me and a lot of people who work and pay there way is that a rather large minority of the UK are just wastes of space. They dont work they demand increased dole cheques. They are the source of a lot of the countries crime, frankly we could do extremely well without them. And the worst point is that these leeches on society expect the state to give them all that they need from money to housing and those who work are expected to pay for it all with ever increasing taxes.

#721 Re: Human missions » Mission One: a one way ticket to Mars? » 2005-08-10 12:55:51

We are not exactly going to have one greenhouse are we. If we have a group of them then the likehood is that we will need different operating tempatures for the different plant types we grow. There is also the likehood that for purely morale reasons we might create a garden dome just for people to be able to walk into and see greenery.

With this in mind we can use a cooling system and pump to move heated liguid to warm the greenhouses that need more heating and cool the ones that dont. If we use the idea of a large tank reservoir that is sealed we can pump heat into it and have for all intents a large fish farm.

We will only need such a complicated cooling system if we do insulate the greenhouses and domes to the point of little heat loss during the night. But we can use the problem we create as a solution to other issues we have and hopefully reduce the power we need to have to divert from the Nuclear power plant that is essential to any base or colony plan we have.

As RobertDyck has investigated, UV-blocking coatings are already used in high-end windows here on Earth, on a plastic substrate no less, with essentially 100% optical transparency

Interesting but most Uv protection coatings on windows only reduces the amount of Uv that penetrates. Mars though has not atmospheric protection at all and as such the most dangerous bands of Uv light will have unlike on the Earth free access to the surface. The best Uv protection I have found from a lot of googling and asking glass companies is to stop all but 8% of the Uv light and this begins to make the glass very dark. Add the increased protection needed to strengthen the plastic and the extra Uv protection it is likely that Mars greenhouses will have rather dark windows

Just shifting the heat around between greenhouses growing different crops won't work, that is like shifting water between different compartments of a ship full of holes. The problem must be aproached from the whole pressurized volume of the colony, that the total amount of heat energy it absorbs from the sun or is pumped in by nuclear/solar sources must be balenced by the amount of energy that is lost, or else you get a net buildup of heat. If the total heat absorbed by the colony exceeds that lost, then it doesn't matter where you move the excess heat to, somewhere in the colony will become too hot and the heat transport system will not be able to cope. Remember, heat only travels from hot to cold (without phase change anyway), so eventually the "hot" greenhouse will get just as hot as the coolant from the other "cold" greenhouses, and no more heat can be dumped into it. Simply because it has a fish pond in it doesn't change the fact that you must balence the heat in versus heat out.

Of course, the equation won't be the same for the entire day, that even though the greenhouses may get too hot during the day, they may also get too cold during the night. In this case, having a "pond" or fish tanks or something as a heat sink would be useful, that you could circulate warm water into it during the day, and warm water out of it during the Martian night. There may still be too much heat though, but it would go a long way to helping. You would also have the ease of only having to heat/cool one body of water with mechanical means.

I also reject this notion that a UV/IR selective coating for plastic greenhouses would make them "too dark" or something, you don't give the chemists enough credit... I do think that such a coating would be pretty easy to develop, as coatings that work nearly as well as we need for greenhouses are already used in high-end windows. If they aren't good enough, I am sure we could do better with a little research. You might be confused also, that the coating in windows is most often applied to a plastic sheet, which is then sandwiched between the glass.

Fortunatly we can automate the process by pumping the hot water to a series of loops outside to cool the mixture if we find it is getting too hot. Especially if they have a high surface area and we can use these only if we truly need too. Hopefully the insulation we use will mean that heat loss from the colony is small at night.

I certainly hope that a Uv protection for greenhouses has been done but as stated with a lot of googling and asking people who deal with the glass industry I have still to find anyone who has such a coating that does not reduce the visible light spectrum. It does not mean it does not exist just I have not found it yet. You will also see in my post that it is the plastic that is sunblocked and I have even mentioned it still glass is the cheapest stuff we use even when toughened enough to protect a greenhouse on mars. It will be glass we use there as it will reasonably easy to make more as long as we have silicates and if we have to create a thick anti Uv layer it is that layer that makes the glass more opaque.

#722 Re: Human missions » Mission One: a one way ticket to Mars? » 2005-08-10 11:55:34

I'm just guessing but there might be mirrors that don't reflect UV light, maybe something like a prism that breaks up the light into spectral colours. We could use these exclusively to light up greenhouses rather than bothering with UV blocking windows if they can't be made any better.

Problem with refraction is that one of the important colours of light that plants need is the colour blue which has a wavelength about 475nms so would probably be blocked by this method. We will just have to accept that the best method of farming on Mars is to use artificial lighting to grow plants to support the poor light Mars gets. Still not a surmountable problem as long as we have the energy.

#723 Re: Human missions » Mission One: a one way ticket to Mars? » 2005-08-10 10:02:30

We are not exactly going to have one greenhouse are we. If we have a group of them then the likehood is that we will need different operating tempatures for the different plant types we grow. There is also the likehood that for purely morale reasons we might create a garden dome just for people to be able to walk into and see greenery.

With this in mind we can use a cooling system and pump to move heated liguid to warm the greenhouses that need more heating and cool the ones that dont. If we use the idea of a large tank reservoir that is sealed we can pump heat into it and have for all intents a large fish farm.

We will only need such a complicated cooling system if we do insulate the greenhouses and domes to the point of little heat loss during the night. But we can use the problem we create as a solution to other issues we have and hopefully reduce the power we need to have to divert from the Nuclear power plant that is essential to any base or colony plan we have.

As RobertDyck has investigated, UV-blocking coatings are already used in high-end windows here on Earth, on a plastic substrate no less, with essentially 100% optical transparency

Interesting but most Uv protection coatings on windows only reduces the amount of Uv that penetrates. Mars though has not atmospheric protection at all and as such the most dangerous bands of Uv light will have unlike on the Earth free access to the surface. The best Uv protection I have found from a lot of googling and asking glass companies is to stop all but 8% of the Uv light and this begins to make the glass very dark. Add the increased protection needed to strengthen the plastic and the extra Uv protection it is likely that Mars greenhouses will have rather dark windows

#724 Re: Human missions » Mission One: a one way ticket to Mars? » 2005-08-09 12:19:03

The single greatest problem for growing plants on Mars is unlike the Earth the planet Mars recieves undiluted light from the Sun. A greenhouse on Mars will have to act like the Earths atmosphere and this means it will have to give almost complete Uv protection especially of the most harmful Uv b and Uv c ranges of the spectrum. Artificial lighting will have to be used as all currently in use Uv protections for greenhouses also reduce the most important light ranges this being red and blue. Uv is fatal in even medium doses to plants

Artificial lighting for plants though has recently gone through a bit of a major advancement with the creation of Cheap very efficient LEDs. If we put into a greenhouse LEDs in the range of between 80 to 96% red and 6 to 20% blue the majority of most plants needs can be met. If we also change the atmosphere in the greenhouses to higher than normal CO2 and warmer tempatures with a good nutrient supply then good yields should be possible.

Another advantage is that LEDs are long life items and also reasonably easy to create in an automated fashion. Solar cells are an example of a similar technology and there automated creation has been explored in many previous threads. If the materials to make greenhouses can be found on Mars and there creation automated then Food should not be a problem for Mars settlers.

Another technology in its infancy but with obviously important benefits is automation of a greenhouse farm and the computer providing control of the enviroment and needing as little human intervention as possible. The Japanese seem to be the masters at this as they are now routinely building such automated farms under sky scrapers and similar buildings. These Japanese Farms are examples of 100% artificial light enviroments with automated enviromental controls.

one final advantage to a more automated enviromental farm is the reduction of the risk of spreading disease between farms and the risk of a famine.

#725 Re: Human missions » Mission One: a one way ticket to Mars? » 2005-08-09 10:59:37

The trouble with heating a permafrost is it melts and you get sinkage. So any heat exchange to a Martian permafrost has to be carefully done. Still it should be possible to get heat flow reversed during the Martian night by a heat exchanger and get some return.

There are certain plants that benefit though from a very warm enviroment this is in the form of the sea weeds and algae. Heating that amount of water would be very energy intensive but with luck we should get a decent return in the form of food.

Still a lot of work to be done on this whole genre.

  1. Index
  2. » Search
  3. » Posts by Grypd

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB