New Mars Forums

Official discussion forum of The Mars Society and MarsNews.com

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Announcement: This forum is accepting new registrations via email. Please see Recruiting Topic for additional information. Write newmarsmember[at_symbol]gmail.com.

#26 Re: Not So Free Chat » Any poets? - Comments, CONSTRUCTIVE critisism, ideas. » 2002-10-31 09:38:11

There Once was a Man from Cydonia
Who's spacesuit was cooled by ammonia

After one little trip
Suit started to drip

Now his bum's the cleanest in the colonia

#27 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Mass Drivers on Mars - "Space gun" to shoot stuff to Earth??? » 2002-10-26 14:46:02

During our initial research, there was one statement that the entire team kept in mind.  I'm not sure exactly where it came from but :  "A railgun is good for about one hundred shots, plus or minus one hundred."

If the projectile is not moving fast enough, it can easily weld right to the rails.  The idea is to run the current through the whole system fast enough to induce the fields and shoot before the system slags.  My team is still out to try a slightly different approach, but we still run the risk of our rectifier releasing what we called in school the "magic smoke".

We also found that graphite is frequently used on the rails as a lubricant.  I think a railgun on Mars would be prepared by running a quick blast of low current on the rails to attract the fines in place of graphite. 

I still never expect a railgun to place any living creature in space.  But one quirk of railgun technology may help:  Under a high current, water itself becomes explosive, as some budding high energy tinkerers have found when touching huge capacitors and having most of the water in their bodies explode.  Maybe Mars ice could become fuel, I'd just hope the huge capacitors could be made from local materials. 

turbo

#28 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Mass Drivers on Mars - "Space gun" to shoot stuff to Earth??? » 2002-10-26 13:00:20

The beast I'm still hammering away on is an open-air type of railgun, just like MIT's version.  So far, the simplest one I've seen is two copper strips fastened to a board and fed through a capacitor bank.  The little one launches pennies and sections of copper wire.

The best railguns so far throw titanium "darts" encased in an aluminum sabot. The sabot provides the contact between the rails so the magnetic fields can build up.  Once clear of the rails, air resistance opens the sabot and the dart continues with little loss of energy, just like some artillery shells.

The powerlabs.org site is one of the first we used when researching the feasibility of building a rail gun, and one of the big reasons we started almost a year prior to the senior project due date.  Bear in mind this is at a rate of one day available per week to work on the thing for about 95% of the project duration.

Tom, I didn't do the calcs for the G forces, I only reported so far the fastest I know of is a 2 Kg sphere fired at 6 Km/second on what I recall as being the University of Texas' 18 foot railgun.  Check their site as the original data gathered for my team's railgun is with my partner at the moment.

There were other sites that showed the Lorenz Effect, my favorite was the tube that launched a large metal ring placed around it.  Lately alot of "fringe technology" has disappeared from the Web (no surprise) so I'm not sure what is still available.

turbo, who loves fringe technology

#29 Re: Not So Free Chat » Lifetime of advanced machinery - How long can advanced machinery last? » 2002-10-26 12:31:31

The hardware is smaller greatly because of Surface Mount Technology, which is not known to be keen on vibration.  Maybe adding a layer of acrylic over the circuit boards will keep the fines away and make sure those components stay put during launch and landing.  Electrostatic filters may be able to deal with fines as well, but those filters would have to be kept well away from the circuitry. 

For the daily dealing with the fines, would it be possible to place electrostatic collection plates around the end of an airlock?  The suit radios would have to be well shielded, but better that than contaminated control circuits in the power or ventilation systems.

Mechanical parts?, sealed units where everything is immersed in mineral oil or hydraulic fluid I guess.  OR...sealed units connected only through magnetic force.

Where there's a will, there's a way
turbo

#30 Re: Mars Society International » Very Cunning Amendments - Prototype Settlements Preempted » 2002-10-25 20:14:54

Having no desire to board a vessel designed to sink ( as in submarine), my 8+ Navy years were spent mostly on surface ships.  On my first ship I made an appointment with myself to go see the Sun after two straight weeks after two straight weeks at sea.  Duh, good reason to use the 24-hour clock as I walked into the Hanger Bay to find the pitch black night of the Med outside.

I have to believe that as the routine sets in of putting on suit and checking systems (and the myriad other things that will need to be done on Mars) that the excitement of being one of the first will rapidly fade and like a deployed ship, the messages from "home" will be the most anticipated.  I can fully understand why a "media wall" is a part of the analog habs now. 

As far as the children, I tend to agree with the environment as influence psychologists that the first generations will grow up in the steel/aluminum with glass windows world of airlocks and leak alarms and whatever else and find Earth a strange and hostile environment.  Human actions aside (i.e crime), tell a Colonial child about hurricanes/cyclones and they may ask why anyone would want to live on such a horrible planet with its terrible weather, dangerous life (find one rattlesnake on Mars, I dare you) and disease-causing intense solar radiation and crushing gravity.  Those kids will probably ask why it took so long to get off the Earth once the technology was ready.

turbo

#31 Re: Mars Society International » Very Cunning Amendments - Prototype Settlements Preempted » 2002-10-25 12:20:56

So for starters the first colonists will have to be experienced submarine crews?  Some of those guys live in a world without windows for months at a time.  Send along a sunlamp and the glass and steel world won't bother them.

I keep seeing the first decades as a mixture of "Outland", the foundry of "Alien 3", and the shipping area of "Fortress II".  I admit I'm still very partial to the roofed-over trenches as basically a squared Moon Base Alpha of "Space 1999" fame. 

Hmmm, moonbases, landers, and starships.  How about we split NASA's budget between the Russians and the Brits?  The Brits design it and the Russians get it there.  Anybody know if ESA has openings?

turbo, who is tired of LEO

#32 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Mass Drivers on Mars - "Space gun" to shoot stuff to Earth??? » 2002-10-24 08:44:14

The barnyard logic is close!

The object provides the electrical connection between the rails.  A high current input generates two powerful magnetic fields of the same polarity in the rails.  Newton's equal and opposite reaction gets twisted into the "Lorenz Effect", where the two opposing fields force the object to move perpendicular to the direction of the fields.  The stronger the fields, the faster the acceleration.  The railgun used by the University of Texas has its own power station to provide 6 MEGA-Amperes (yep, six million) of current, so the 2 Kg ball achieves hypersonic speed. 

The biggest problem with a railgin is the projectile must be moving when it gets on the rails, a standing start normally results in the projectile being quickly welded to the rails.  Coil guns can do standing starts, but are more complex because of the timing circuits needed.

turbo, who has a diassembled railgun in his van until lab partner has storage room in his garage.

#33 Re: Space Policy » Writing our politicians » 2002-10-16 17:59:01

Uh, enjoyed the tirade.  Suggest you look up "sovereign citizenship" , read a few books, and get the idea this forum has members NOT in or from the US.

Dear UK, Australia, and Canada members:
As ex-Navy I fully understand "ugly American", please believe we are a diverse people.  Myself or my children may be unable to stand on the surface of Mars, but if able would like to help you and yours do so.

Phobos, I think someone is in need of a metal hat!

turbo

#34 Re: Not So Free Chat » Russian reality TV show » 2002-10-09 12:12:33

Watch it?  I want to be IN it!!! 
Somebody get a photo of NASA's faces when precious ISS hosts game show contestant   big_smile  tongue
turbo

#35 Re: Life support systems » Growing plants on Mars » 2002-10-02 11:07:47

I did come up with a scheme to produce starch or sugar as a by-product of recycling oxygen. Electrolysis produces oxygen with hydrogen gas as its waste product, and carbon dioxide is simply dumped. That is the system currently on ISS, but it recycles only half the oxygen astronauts breathe. Water has to be shipped up to feed the electrolysis tank to produce enough oxygen. Adding a Sabatier reactor would convert the hydrogen and half the carbon dioxide into methane and water. That water would be enough to feed the electrolysis tank, so all oxygen breathed by astronauts would be recycled. The waste product of that system is methane and carbon dioxide gasses, both of which have to be dumped in space.

This alternative I am talking about is a biochemical device that may be described as biotech. It produces either sugar or starch instead of gasses. The starch could be fed to a fermentation tank where yeast would convert some into protein. Raw potatoes contain 78% water, 18% starch, 2.2% protein, 1% ash, and 0.1% fat. Yeast in starch can add protein to the same level as potatoes. The result would have the consistency of pudding and no taste at all. The Hawaiian food poi is made from Taro root. It has the same consistency and lack of flavour. You could consider this a synthetic form of poi.

The only caution is to select yeast that does not produce alcohol; most yeast does. The alcohol can easily be boiled off by cooking, but you have to be careful inside a sealed habitat. You don't want alcohol condensing inside electronics. The steam could be captured and temperature fractionated from water to ensure all water is recycled. Such a device is normally called a 'still, and alcohol produced from distilling fermented starchy food is normally called vodka. Somehow I don't see NASA planners accepting that. Yeast used for non-alcoholic beer should solve that problem.

As for growing hydroponics, there are several people conducting hydroponic experiments today. A couple are Mars Society members. Hydroponics do not rely on Mars soil, they use water and processed nutrients dissolved in that water. It does take some attention to maintain the nutrient balance, but it does work.

Processing Mars regolith into a fertile soil is possible. The problem right now is determining exactly what is there. Data from Mars right now is inconclusive. It appears there is some clay, and a great deal of feldspar. There is also a great deal of iron, but that may be tied up in minerals such as augite, chromite, bronzite, and olivine. There is almost no carbon or nitrogen in the soil, but nitrogen fixing plants can create nitrites and nitrates from nitrogen in the air. All plants fix carbon, they create organic matter from carbon dioxide, but higher plants requires some organic carbon compounds in the soil. This can be added with primitive plants. Pre-processing treatments can speed soil preparation; such as like soaking with water to neutralize super oxides, or bubbling carbon dioxide through the water to create carbonic acid to neutralize the alkali. It shouldn't take long to prepare fertile soil.

Greenhouse atmosphere can be created by pressurizing with Martian atmosphere, extracting carbon dioxide and pumping that out, and increasing oxygen content by capturing oxygen released by neutralizing super oxides. Depending on how much oxygen is released from the soil, and assuming 95% of the carbon dioxide and 80% of the carbon monoxide from Mars atmosphere is removed, the result should be about 45.3% nitrogen, 26.8% argon, 22.3% oxygen, 2.26% carbon dioxide, and 0.23% carbon monoxide. At only 5psi pressure that may not be enough for humans to breathe, but it should be suitable for plants.

Okay, so maybe no "Stolichmarsya" or "Absolut-Extraterrestrial" for NASA.  Then again, if the distilling process yields methanol and not ethanol, we win!!!  NASA's own engineers put in the TechBriefs that they've found methanol for fuel cells yields hydrogen for less voltage than water electrolysis.   
 
Now, since NASA has a major case of "space  station fixation", I think I'm more interested in what ESA planners would think. 

If I promise not to take a rover and then go paint crossed-eyeballs on the Cydonian "Face", you let me have the right tech available so when NASA finally does get to the colonies, they get greeted with vodka, corn whiskey, and beer. 

Hmmm, a forced diet of fish, soy burgers, and probably some gritty form of "Vegemite."  Add the enforced wearing of diapers on long EVA's, all the DVD's have been watched so much each line is memorized, and it takes eighteen months for the pizza delivery to show.  Come on!, at least the colonists will be non-smokers!

If the "planners" forbid instant coffee, I shall the lead the mob.  Forget the rope, I'll bring a nice sturdy tow strap!

I wonder what vices the ice eskimos have?
turbo

#36 Re: Human missions » Advanced Communications Systems - more efficient communications » 2002-09-30 11:54:53

I've seen nothing describing the bandwidth of Viking's transmitters, and no mention of noise floor.  We have to get creative, so back in the mighty text, I see under Shannon Limit that a standard voice band comms system has a 2.7 KHz band width and a 30 dB SNR.  Text gives specific mention that digital comms won't work there, so thinking 1970s I'm hoping our little space probe was analog.   Otherwise, look at using 6 KHz for minimum BW. 

If the Viking orbiter's 30 Watt transmitter could be returned to service, at least Aricebo would hear, right?

t

#37 Re: Human missions » Advanced Communications Systems - more efficient communications » 2002-09-28 09:59:56

I've got one book on comms with equations all over the place, but nothing about power needed over distance that I can find.

You definately have me wondering seth, since I imagine the HF and VHF bands would probably be very dirty.

Clarke belt needs a little calculation.  Mighty text book shows Kepler's third law to show Clarke belt for earth to be 35,768 km.  Calcs I've done shows belt would be 41,362.49 km minus  the equatorial radius of Mars, which I don't have handy.

On the bright side, I had found that Viking used an S-band transmitter with a whopping 20 Watts of power to send data to Earth.  NASA website also says the orbiter part carried a relay radio of 30 Watts, and transmitted to earth at 381 MHz, in the UHF band.  I didn't see any mention if the thing used PSK, FSK, or some other scheme.  (For Cindy and all those without fancy textbooks on comms, PSK = Phase Shift Keying and FSK = Frequency Shift Keying).

Hmmm, I wonder if any of those sats that were mentioned before (the nuke powered that never turned on) are set up for TDMA?  Might not need multiplexing in the first years, but would be nice to have the capability.

Gotta find that equatorial radius........
turbo, whose advanced comms text is copyrighted 2001   smile

#38 Re: Not So Free Chat » Other than Mars... - ...what do people do? » 2002-09-23 09:50:48

I'll chime in Adrian.
I just finished my Bachelors in Electronics Engineering Technology and at the moment am not working.  I was just turned down for a five month stint in Antarctica (they wanted more experience) but I'm still up for a job in the Control Room at one of the local television stations.

Other than Mars, I'm a member of the group called "TIGHAR" who are involved in many projects, including the search for Amelia Earhart.  I guess that means I'm into aviation, space, and of course long-shots!   smile

The old team is still going to get together and finish working on the mass driver, and I still have to finish the 1:1 replica of R2D2 that was put on hold while I finished school.  Somehow during all the other things, including finishing the EVA pack I started yesterday, I'm supposed to make a "Wizardmon" doll. 

Tonight I get to help with a "Raingutter Regatta" boat for my son's Cub Scout meeting, and then later help my neighbor with a full-sized boat.

Dear future Boss, save me from too many projects!   tongue

turbo, now off in search of misplaced coffee cup

#39 Re: Human missions » Mars Direct Rethought - Fixing the potholes in Zubrin's plan » 2002-09-23 09:18:10

Hi Rob and All!
I'm kind of curious about the power generation issue.  Besides the photovoltaics, would it be possible to use something like a radiometer in the thin Martian air?  I think radiometer is the right name, it's one of those light bulb looking things with fins inside.  One side of a fin is white, the other black, and the idea is sunlight causes uneven heating to make the whole thing spin.

Shot in the dark I know, but a possibility?
t

#40 Re: Unmanned probes » Problems with Beagle - A blow to Mars Express » 2002-09-22 09:56:33

I have to go with Josh on Beagle.  I think somehow the team will get everything done in time for flight.  As for the NASA rovers, I think the project would be better off tranferred to a few teams from "Battle Bots" and "Junkyard Wars."

t

#41 Re: Life support systems » We need a brainstorming session! - Bat around a few ideas. » 2002-09-17 11:36:15

Hello All!

I've finally gotten together enough materials to get started on the "EVA Pack".  I've come up with some dimensions of my own, but if there's any "official" MS dimensions for the simulation packs, I would sure like to know. 

I'd like to make one compatable with the existing metal frames if I could, I'm just not sure why the hose connections come out of the back rather than the top.   ???

Oh yeah, before I over-electronic the thing, does anybody know offhand the type of charging system in the MDRS?  I could make an internally stored DC adapter that could use a regular outlet, but I'd rather keep with the existing charging unit so as not to load the generator.

Any helpful hints?
turbo, frustrated life support system builder

#42 Re: Youth Group / Educational Outreach » Just to start a topic :) - stuff » 2002-09-16 09:38:34

Pagan, I wish there were a lot more 17 year-olds who like space!   Somebody has to drive the rovers, build the colonies, etc.  My son will be your age if the ten year timeline holds, so do me a favor and be on Mars first so I can tell him "See, my buddy Pagan is up there, why not go give him some help?"

turbo

#43 Re: Human missions » Mars Direct Rethought - Fixing the potholes in Zubrin's plan » 2002-09-16 09:12:12

Would it be possible to get the ESA to get interested in repairing Baikonur's vehicle assembly building?  A joint venture with the Japanese maybe?  I'd think the Kazakstan government would be interested. 

It bothers me to think of a cosmodrome going to seed, one less possible launch site.   sad

#44 Re: Interplanetary transportation » The proposed UR-700M launch vehic750 tons to orbit - Most powerful chemical rocket designed? » 2002-09-13 09:54:34

Sounds good to me Mark!  If the idea is to go with surplus Navy ships, would a Virgina-class CGN have a capable enough reactor?  The class is currently out of service as USN decided the refueling expense would not fit the budget at the time. 

NS Savannah was stuck where she is because qualified operators were not available to run her plant.  After years of neglect, I imagine the cost of overhaul would be more than a brand-new Energia. 

Would it be cheaper to place solar panels on a disused oil rig and use it for launches?  I'm thinking Gulf of Mexico area, where getting materials and labor via Mexico would be easier due to the exchange rate.  Perhaps a rig off of the Brazilian coast?

Maybe the Germans will show us all we need are zeppelins and JATO bottles!   smile

t

#45 Re: Interplanetary transportation » The proposed UR-700M launch vehic750 tons to orbit - Most powerful chemical rocket designed? » 2002-09-12 10:07:41

Why a nuclear-powered ship?  Only one was ever built for merchant service, and NS Savannah has been rusting away for years now.  Glomar Explorer maybe?... large deck mounted derrick, opening doors in the bottom of the hull, been for lease for years.

How about a modified barge?

forgive anxious turbo, graduation is tomorrow night

#46 Re: Human missions » Mars Direct Rethought - Fixing the potholes in Zubrin's plan » 2002-09-08 19:42:15

I remember a little boy who saw Apollo 11 launch, I remember he grew up loving aircraft.  I remember he went "down to the Sea in ships".  I remember the day he finally started college, and on Friday I will remember the day he graduates with Honors. 

That little boy shows grey hairs now, but he has another little boy who turns seven next month. 

The grey-haired little boy may not be able to give the dream, but maybe give little boys and girls an entire planet.

Know where to look, Mars is in the night's sky, shining and inviting.  Earth has hostile places to life too, like the "Skeleton Coast"

I might be from the United States, but a British slogan fits..."Who dares wins"

Mars is waiting, if we dare
turbo

#47 Re: Civilization and Culture » Destiny Hall - Keeping the Mars Movement alive » 2002-09-08 19:22:21

Frazer Valley?
I would think somewhere around the "Four Corners" area.  More open space.

Just thinking,

turbo

#48 Re: Human missions » Interior Layout of the habitat » 2002-09-08 10:58:51

So, is it go with the BIOLET types and tell the Nanavut the bacteria is within the hab crews' bodies...OR time to get a greenhouse set up in Utah?

I wonder, since the upper level of the Devon Island hab seems to get too hot for human comfort, anyway to reconfigure the roof and make the top of the hab a greenhouse?

As for greywater treatment, are these better designs than the solar distillation set-ups used in the Texas-Mexico border areas (aka "colonias")?  Last I looked, the typical design ran about $200 USD in materials.

I wish best of luck to Eurohab!
turbo

#49 Re: Planetary transportation » Rover Navigation - How should it be done? » 2002-09-02 17:24:42

I dunno Phobos, how big does a GPS sat have to be?  I had to do a presentation to my Advanced Communications class about geosynch sats, and the altitude on those are like 22,000+ miles.   I don't know if current photovoltaic cells could provide power in a synchronous Mars orbit for a GPS sat.  ???

I'll look again, but I doubt my textbook says anything about
how often a geosynch sat needs orbit correction.

turbo

#50 Re: Not So Free Chat » Maybe I should. . . - "get a life!" » 2002-09-01 11:45:05

Sounds like an interesting project turbo, although it's probably more suited for a thread in 'Mars Analog Research Stations' than here in 'Free Chat'  wink

Actually, I'm kinda hoping to get it into Life Support.  I'd like to start out with the simple simulation types, then work up to CO2 scrubbers and the like, and finally to true self-contained atmosphere. 

I figured I'd start off in Free Chat rather than start a new thread in "Analog."

t   wink

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB