You are not logged in.
Thanks, Aleph!
That really was news to me about hackeysack.
Interesting idea.
The corporation which eventually creates a life-like, anatomically correct, robotic female simulator will make Microsoft's profits look like chump change.
We Americans refer to 'footbag' as 'hackeysack'.
Why that is, I've never bothered to discover. Footbag seems self-explanatory.
I doubt that corporations will ever see enough potential profit on Mars to fund a colony, until governments on Earth have done the heavy lifting.
Besides, colonies will need to attract specialist workers and their families. Corporate colonies will be no exception. The risk of sanctions imposed by neighboring national colonies over human rights violations will also be a grave concern.
I have to agree with Clark. Infrastructure expansion MUST be a high priority for any hypothetical Martian colony. The colony cannot drastically improve its self-sufficiency unless it can grow its population to the point where it can support many, many specialists...among other things.
However, we are not talking about suburban America here. This is Mars, an achingly beautiful desert planet, frost-bitten, dusty, and drenched with radiation. The colony can only provide so much breathable air, feed so many mouths, process so much human feces. That's the reality, personal views on reproductive rights aside.
Most of us would have to compromise some of our long-held principles, if we wished to survive for long in such a place.
Some of us would need to give up our right to own personal guns. Some of us would need to sacrifice our cherished right to privacy. And some of us would have to give up the right to have babies whenever we feel like it.
I think child-bearing should be a licensed activity, in an environment like a Martian colony. However, since the colony MUST grow or eventually die, I believe the infrastructure will accomodate the Martian birth rate. Expansion will be that big of a priority.
I agree with Cobra. Each colony should base its legal code on the accepted norms of its corporate/national sponsors.
The Martians and their Terran backers must be allowed to work things out in an organic fashion, in my opinion. Otherwise, I believe you are asking for BIG problems down the road...from resentful Martians who chafe at the bit; and from resentful Terrans, who've spent billions to establish the colonies in the first place.
Yang Liwei Rocket, I love those images!
Go Taikonauts!
You should visit space.com for a little while, then.
An entire legion of Al Franken wannabes has taken over the message board. You'd find plenty of kindred spirits there.
Clark, as a Neocon partisan myself, I must say that I've had the best laugh today...seeing you being accused of being a CIA agent.
You must be deeply, deeply, deeply, undercover.
I've had a minor obssession with Greco-Roman civilization ever since I was a child. A colony layout based on Roman ideas would not only look cool beyond belief, I think it would also be incredibly functional!
I'd go to Mars in a heartbeat, and live there, but not without my wife.
I'm sure Cindy knows the answer to that one.
Hey, even Whacko Jacko made some fine music, and he's arguably a pedophile. Voltaire might have kept it in the family, but it doesn't diminish his genius in my eyes. Aren't all really smart people incredibly bizarre in one way or another?
Besides, it was 18th century France. Who knows where ordinary French people drew the lines of sexual morality back then?
I love the idea of nice gold coins.
Personally, I'm not a Trekkie per se, but I love the idea of putting Captain Kirk's face on some kind of planet-wide Martian colonial currency. I think it would add a nice touch of humor to the various societies of such a hostile, if achingly beautiful, land.
My dream confederacy of city-states, stretching from the subsurface ice reservoirs of Arcadia to the peak of Pavonis Mons, would have some astute quote from Voltaire as its motto. Voltaire rules. :;):
Gee, Earthfirst, I'm surprised you didn't say that the Confederate Battle Flag should be the only flag on Mars.
The Russian 'Mars 1989'-class solar electric spacecraft is one of my favorite designs for a piloted interplanetary vehicle. It has a radial symmetry like the Mir space station had, and uses large farms of solar panels to provide power. It also relies on xenon-fueled ion thrusters for primary propulsion.
This ship is very much an extension of your "Space Station With A Rocket Attached" concept. In fact, if you look closely, you can clearly see similarities to Mir.
I understand the logic behind Mars Direct, but as a thing of sheer beauty, I'd rather be flying this girl around the inner solar system :
[http://www.astronautix.com/craft/mars1989.htm]http://www.astronautix.com/craft/mars1989.htm
I'd love to see an updated version of this vehicle. It could utilize inflatable components wherever feasible. I'd also like to use abundant, less-expensive, argon or krypton fuel instead of the 165 tons of vanishingly scarce xenon originally called for.
I don't like the short-duration surface mission the Russians call for, however. Seven days on the surface of Mars does not produce enough science to justify the expense of building this kind of vehicle.
I still think it's a beautiful ship, though. Just not in a streamlined, 1950's-esque, Hollywood kind of way.
'Marspost' is a new Russian design which, as we Americans say, "super-sizes" the original 'Mars 1989' idea. I don't think that the "Battlestar Galactica" scale of 'Marspost' is desirable or necessary, however.
With regard to the ISS, though, I personally don't think that the huge redesign and retrofit efforts would be worth the expense. Honestly, it really would be cheaper (and safer) to design and launch a new Mars ship from scratch.
Olympus Mons has such a gradual slope, that I don't know if any good spots on the summit exist to really appreciate the view from the top.
Even the edge of its vast caldera may be less exciting than it at first seems, just because it's so HUGE, and the horizon is so close. Would the other side of the caldera be over the horizon?
I'll bet that a huge cinder cone like Pavonis would be steep enough to have some really awesome sightseeing opportunities.
However, I'm a factory worker, not an astrogeologist. I could easily be wrong.
Gas giants in our own solar system are also fascinating because of they are our best opportunity to learn more about the dozens and dozens of extrasolar gas giants.
The real question might be, "Will the local government of any off-world colony use totalitarian measures to punish its citizens for the expression of religious sentiment?"
I see a situation where an official cult of atheism will unite and radicalize every believer on Mars. Homegrown terrorists of every faith, supported by Terran religious organizations, will cooperate to bring your government to its knees. I don't see this as an attractive option.
Besides, do you know what a fatwa is?
An awesome book about the troubled birth of Station Alpha is, "Island In The Sky", by Piers Bizony.
NASA may finally adopt Shuttle-C now, since the crisis caused by Columbia's loss has forced its various special interest groups to listen to common sense. It is twenty years late, but I say better late than never.
I absolutely love the idea of using Delta IV for launching the CEV, and using Shuttle-C to launch everything else in large pieces.
All those shuttle missions and spacewalks made the ISS vastly more expensive than it needed to be.
The discovery of native Martian nanobacteria will probably cause Western nations to put any plans for a permanent outpost on hold.
Of course, any extant extremophiles will likely be deep underground. Ironically, they'll probably never be found without a large human presence already there on the surface.
That's why I hold out the most hope for China eventually developing permanent outposts and colonies. A significant fraction of America's power elite is gripped by deep-seated self-loathing. Human expansion into the solar system is too reminiscent of the Age Of Exploration for these folks.
The Chinese government, however, may see space colonization as a way of establishing its role as the dominant superpower in the century ahead.
More power to them. I hope that I live to see the PRC launch a few big nuclear reactors to a Martian settlement, as helpless Western environmentalists have conniption fits.
I wish things were different, but as they are I'll be happy to see human beings from any nation travel to Mars. In truth, I doubt that the eventual Martian colonists will be Westerners.
Hey, everyone! Howard Dean dropped by to visit! Nice to see you, Doctor!
YAAAARRRRGGGGHHHH!
I am a Space.com flame war veteran, and after a while I just got burnt out defending my right-of-center political views. I am much more likely to be persuaded by rock-steady, ice-cold logic than by insults or baseless allegations. That's why I often avoid the usual political discussions.
There are many extremely knowledgable people who post there, and you can learn an *awful* lot once you separate the wheat from the chaff, so to speak.
The ancient Greek playwright Euripides, who was a veteran of the Battle of Marathon (if I'm not mistaken), wrote many plays which condemned both jingoistic militarism and the institution of slavery. He was also a firm believer in womens' rights.
Euripides had an almost 20th-century view of society, but his attempts to create social change through his plays fell mostly on deaf ears.