You are not logged in.
LO
It would clear a lot of mist if you stopped referring to the US regime as "cons", DonPanic. European Conservatives have not got much in common with the Anglo-American breed
This was partly a reply to Dickbill who knows what "cons" means in french, something as a "slots", brainless ones, far away from politics, kinda private joke
I know that in Northern Europe, even conservatives agree with high price social welfare
and even true American Conservatives are against the war and the government.
Wasn't demonstrated in ballots, unless you never read news
???
LO
frankly, after the last news from Iraq, you see what I mean, I am too disgusted to talk about anything Mars.
I am sure I am not alone to feel like that.
I think that cons don't even realize that for very large part of the world, USA is synonim of Abou Ghraib and now, a country which trademark is shooting hatefully at wounded disarmed people. Reps like it so much that way, they are proud of that.
For almost rest of the world, that is reminded however the terrorists act, unhappily.
3 more other countries to quit coalition, Nederland, Bulgaria and Romania.
British anger at Blair and Bush rising higher. Now 2 brits out of three want GB to withdraw from Irak
LO
FreMasonery might have been just a covert for something else. And I still don't understand why the US 1 dollar bill has this obvious freemason symbol, the eye and the pyramid, in addition with this comment "Novus Ordo Seclorum", New Secular order. Followed by "In God we Trust". Quite antithetical statements on the most powerful symbol of a nation, its money.
What does all that mean ?
That 18th Century Freemasonry aims of spreading scientific knowledge and social welfare were in harmony with the ideals of the fathers of american Constitution.
Not so antithetic, after all, freemasons never denied God as being the "Great Architect" of the Universe, and that science as trying to find and share the secrets rules of the "Great Architect" was some act of faith.
Splits in freemason christian rightist and leftist atheistic and anticlerical lodges came mainly from France because of french revolution and its struggle against monarchist clergy.
Today Freemasonry influence and so-called network are largely overestimated, some other links between people like having been studying in the same university or highschool like in France "X Pont", Princeton or Harvard in USA, or Oxford in GB are much more proeminent.
Is it possible that the people of the most fundamentalist religious christian nation, defined recently by the term "value voters", are actually indirectly manipulayed by obscure atheist secret organizations with secret goals ?
I'd rather think there is a billonaires conspiracy to corrupt lawmakers for ever more easy ways to make profits and to escape from any taxe by maintaining world disorder and conflicts and by keeping fiscal paradises out of any international control.
LO
First, gotta remember that freemasonery was the union the top leaders of the Corporations implied in Cathedrals building in all Europe.
Today's ceremonials in freemasonery groups is a copy of ceremonials marking the progress of each Companion in his own Corporation.
In the 13th Century middle ages, corporation leaders of cathedrals builders represented the top of Science and Culture, these men read and spoke latin, necessary to work in all Europe.
They knew mathematics and geometry, clockwork which was in the 13th century as advanced a science as robotic or genetic today. Stained glasses in cathedral windows needed alchemy deep knowledge.
Remember the freemason emblems were and are still the compas and the triangle.
To keep companions'high wages, all techniques were kept secret, treason of secrets was punished by death.
Today, a modern corporation-type association as "Les Compagnons du Tour de France"* who built the Eiffel Tower are never poor fellows, always have lot of work ahead. (Not any enterprise contacted by Eiffel had accepted to build it, "Les Compagnons du Tour de France"* took the challenge)
They invented counterplated wood panels, for instance, allowing to build over 70 yards long wooden arches.
Having a house built by "Les Compagnons du Tour de France"* is a guaranty of zero fault and that this house will last many centuries...
* Nothing to see with "Le Tour de France" bike race
By end of 18th Century, whith the growing power of bourgeoisie they were the leaders, they admitted in the freemasonery members of the gentry and of the clergy who wanted scientific advancement.
Even King of France Louis XVI was a freemason !
Sorry it's late for me, I'll speak of freemasons later on...
Are George Bush and the US manipulated by some occult templars or freemasons ?
I really can't suspect GWB to be a top Science and Culture leader
LO
Highlighting a single or specific political murder while keeping quiet about the thousands of intellectuals or others dealt with in a similar manner by the Bolsheviks (not implying that Fascists always are nice guys either, of course). The Matteotti murder in 1923 is a similar case. It almost brought down Mussolini's government at a time when hundreds of thousands of Russian workers had been shot or put in camps by Lenin simply because they used their (as they thought) right to go on strike.
- I'm never quite sure I'm right or wrong
- I never take the crimes of one side to justify the opposite side's ones.
- Lenin was sent to Russia by german secret services with german gold as a succesful attempt to set Russia out of WW1.
- Mussolini was a fully extreme left socialist activist before he elaborated Fascist doctrine.
The objective was a total revision of the relations on the labour market built on principles of equal influence between employers and employees, basically the same formula adopted by many Reform Socialists at the time, in Sweden not the least.
Hitler eliminated both communists and social democrats who where the first victims in concentration camps, even the trade unions leaders which had turned to nazism.
Speaking about Franco and the Phalangists, I have been of the impression that his regime was primarily of a reactionary nature, would you agree on that?
Yes, the country had become a whole mess with quarrels and fights between socialists, anarchosyndicalists and communists.
If the Phalangists were committed to Corporativism, I guess it would make them rather Fascist.
Nevertheless, there is actually a word for such reactionary regimes, it's "Paternal Autocrat" rather than Fascist.
Anyhow you name it, the aim is to have a strong hold over a docile labour class.
If I recall, Juan Domingo Pèron did attend a Fascist rally in Piazza Venezia in 1940. Listening to one of Mussolini's popular speeches, he was overwhelmed by the message and became determined from that point on to pursue such policies in relation to Argentina.
Benito's speeches where coloured with his socialist past, this plus the mass parades that had impressed Hitler who had hurried to organize more impressive mass parades were to please to any populist dictator. Mao Ze Dong and Kim Il Sung taking the lead in that domain.
Franco & Salazar?
Didn't they play 2nd base and shortstop for the 1937 NY Giants?
LO
Corporatism is Fascistic, Monarchism is not, yet it's an institution that can be accepted by Fascist regimes, exposing the practical-mindedness of their way of ruling. Not being an expert on Spain, I say it was a cross and toss between Fascism and Catholic Conservatism (another essentially different entity).
As for Franco himself, I believe he was essentially a Catholic conservative.
You're right.
Absolute monarchies may be close to fascism, except for "monarchies éclairées", real parliamentary monarchies are fully democratic.
Better examples of Fascists would probably be Peron in Argentina and in the present time Chavez in Venezuela.
Not quite, as they rely(ed) on trade unions when real fascists want to destroy them. I should say Mugabe's regime.
Anyway, what was so horrible about Franco? That he regulated the economy so the little people could live in the centre of Madrid?
Better not be an opponent . The fact is that unlike Hitler or Mussolini, Franco was no doubt a fine strategist who had good evaluation of balance of power. Knowing that after attack at Russia, Hitler coudn't protect spanish coasts against British Navy, and that democracys would win at the end, he softened his regime by marginalizing Phalanxs, turned at alliance with Opus Dei, and negociated with GB and USA.
He had refused to engage against France saying that spanish monarchy was tighted by perpetual peace treaties and that the King of Spain couldn't parjure what the former kings of Spain had signed on.
Phalanxs had shot among Spain's greatest poets, Federico García Lorca, and opposition to Franco kept repeating that Franco's regime was a regime that killed poets and poetry.
LO
Contrary to popular misconception, Franco wasn't a fascist.
The fact that Franco and Salazar were both monarchists and especially corporatists made their regimes essentialy fascists ones. Corporatism and fascism are tighly linked.
I you want to argue on European history, I'm your man...got many good volumes on that topic
LO
DonPanic, what on Earth are you talking about?
Franco
LO
Quote (C M Edwards @ Nov. 09 2004, 09:25)
How do post-fascists end their lives?Kept in deep coma thanks to therapeutic acharnment
Ah, drug the opposition. How wonderfully liberal.
HA HA, that's conservative bigots who forbid to unplug all the machines that keep in artificial life fascist dictators
LO
How do post-fascists end their lives? :laugh:
Kept in deep coma thanks to therapeutic acharnment
LO
Even in France, a strong opposition is rising against Europe seen as the promotor of wild economic liberalism and destroyer of public services, welfare state, employment, though the European Constitution to be voted should correct economic liberalism in a more social way, and a more parliamentary lead Europe against european technocrats.
The example of wild economic liberalism is British Railways privatization, that led to weak regional railways networks, unable to invest into railways modernisation, and as a result, many railways accidents with many victims.
In France, national railway society isn't seen at all as a transportation monopoly, because of trucks and coaches, and airways transportation concurrence.
Same with the french National Electricity Company, which delivers electricity at the same price to all families whereever they are located, the counterexample is the failure of californian electricity distribution system.
A yes to European Constitution is not acquired in France.
British public opinion on Europe isn't very rationnal, it's been manipulated for years by Murdoch powerful media group, french bashing campaining each time it can.
It's helped by french government attitude, relying on Frenh-German tandem.
Ah, but they were Nazis. Not the same thing. :;):
LO
Nazis end their lifes by shooting at themselves in a bunker
Fascists being hanged by feets
Erk
LO
None of those things are free, and none will exist without national security.
But you just just sit tight while we do it, and you can sit safely under the umbrella, so that we can hold one more thing over your head every time you disagree with us. :;):
We know perfectly how much we pay for our social system free services : half of what we earn with our jobs.
Go tell the Spanishes how well you protected them "under your umbrella"...
You're getting paranoîac, India, China, Europe, need you for commercials, not for your so-called umbrella.
With one satellite launcher out of ten exploding at ignition, throw up these nuclear load satellites.
They start from your country.
LO
Interesting. Well maybe in the future air power will not be used for the intial strike I am not sure of how easy it will be to target ground based anti-air/space weapons. My guess is if you have a lot of suborbital fighters performing evasive flying patterns. Then once the ground base laser firers once it will be a quickly identified target. Falcon type fighters can get anywhere in the world in what was it 40 minutes? If such wars occurred allot of systems would go down very quickly. Satellites might be easy to target but maybe not suborbital fighters.
Being based on the ground doesn't mean immobile.
D'you mean that you want to go at war at the whole world ?
Or d'you try to convince me you have all gone weaponmaniacs ?
LO
If it wasn't us, sooner or later someone was going to do it.
So lets make them play catch up.
Do it After all, if you have so much money to waste... YOU PAY, we watch
We prefer to have medicare for everybody, free schools, free nurseries, universities which's fare is 300 $ A YEAR.
safe trains that go at 200 miles an hour, owning half the production of Soyouz, 52 nuclear plants that assure us cheap electricity
We're so stupid froggies
By the way, I said destroying missiles by laserbeams was very difficult, unless impossible,
I never said that destroying satellites by laserbeams was impossible...
LO
Here is an help : in France, engineers and scientists have worked on "time compression" to get a very very powerful laser beam that would last less than 1 nanosecond...some kind of laserbeam high power concentration amplifier.
An application for laserbeam fusion researchs (in cooperation with USA) http://www-lmj.cea.fr/html/cea.htm]LaserMegaJoule
Sorry site in french Click on "Le Laser Méga Joule en 3 minutes")
Don't forget the laserbeam countermeasures like highly reflective surfaces, high temperature shield...
Capacity of destroying manoeuvering missiles by laserbeams isn't for tomorrow ???
Hmmm…space is what 100 Km so the low point of the satellite will be at 100 Km. Ion Engines could boost the orbit when it is the furthest away from earth I don’t know say 5000 km. Anyway my point is the orbit shouldn’t decay too fast and from 100 Km the delay time shouldn’t be that bad. Light moves at 3x8 m/s if I recall correctly that is 300 km/sec. The delay time at 100 Km for a Laser would be 0.33 s. And of course if it is particle beam the delay time will be longer. Anyway that is enough time for someone to get out of the way but they will be running around a lot. Kind of like a chicken with their head cut off. Psychologically I think it would be bad news for guerrillas.
Lo
Problem isn't the speed of light (300000 km/s), but the speed of the aiming system, atmospheric dispersion and deviation of laser beams, plus the laser beam power supply ???
In "Star Wars" 1 project, power supply was supposed to be a nuclear blast that would be turned to light energy that would fire laser beams before the "killer satellite" was destroyed.
Very irreallistic.
LO
If the delay time was significant relative to the velocity of the vehicle the targeting problem would be really interesting mathematically.
And more again if targets have a random trajectory
LO
Ha, Go fits to my brain, as I beated my Go teacher the day after he learned me the game (he had a 2 stones handicap)
Maybe there will be a strong scientists opposition to that new StarWars programm. Some of the rationnals for opposing "Star Wars" might still have the same value, as the difficulty of focusing a laser beam on a target going to more than a mille per second...
I was told that french missiles warheads had an helicoîdal trajectory to minimise vulnerability to laser and antimissiles attacks.
Not so amazing from a people which often opens bottles of wine
LO
Oh, the Iranian's practices launching a SCUD missle from a freighter ship in the mid 90's.
Not sure that Iran would be abble in a next future to miniaturize a nuclear warhead. That is quite a USA and french-ally monopoly.
(France and USA work on miniaturization in very close cooperation)
I keep saying that accurate secret services on the ground is the most clever investment, and sinking this ship with a cruise missile or a topedo will erase the threat.
One way to exhaust a power is to make it spend 10000 times more for countermeasures than the price of the threat.
By the way, you have already Super-Patriots interceptor missiles, don't you ?
LO
Looks like a kind of french "maginot line" fantasm
Would "space interceptors" have stopped 9/11 terrorists ?
Would space superiority stop a letter with bubonic pest germs ?
That's just a way to give their money back to weapon lobbies. ("retour sur investissement")
The countries which can send satellites are the ones that are the less eager to threaten USA...
LO
Invade France? Bleh. It's like the village tramp, everyone has penetrated her.
Bah France penetrated so many others, even british dynasty is Plantagenet...
Even Clark comes from "clerc"
LO
Invade russia before they help other states that support terror?
Gurlp The Frenches did sale a nuke plant to Saddam, bombed later by Israel.
And Canada sold one to Pakistan.
LO
Iran built its nuke plant with help of Russia.