New Mars Forums

Official discussion forum of The Mars Society and MarsNews.com

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Announcement: This forum is accepting new registrations via email. Please see Recruiting Topic for additional information. Write newmarsmember[at_symbol]gmail.com.

#351 Re: Martian Politics and Economy » Moral Communities to Mars - Send "Civil Body Politics" to Mars » 2004-06-06 09:13:08

And will have science based disagreements. Like you have now on Earth.

You mean like whether or not we really went to the Moon? :;):

No like Quantum theory or string theory and then what string theory. Or what way did the dino's die or is the global warming due to pollution or the end of the ice age. Save Alaska or get oil from it. However no scienicetits are killing each other of this. (AFAIK).

#352 Re: Terraformation » Self Supporting Colony » 2004-06-05 17:42:51

Testing in Antarctica may not be convenient, bur a large warehouse, with easy
access, to test the concepts.

There is nothing to mine in a warehouse, so it doesn't proof the concept of autonomous machine building factories.

#353 Re: Terraformation » Self Supporting Colony » 2004-06-05 14:34:32

The cheapest way to try this out is on Antartica. However you don't have the radioation, breathable air problems. But still a hostile enough enverioment.

#354 Re: Unmanned probes » Exploring more or getting something done? - To send probes or not to send probes... » 2004-06-04 16:37:46

Think about how we design rovers: we design them to do things that we would like to do in person. It seems to me that there is an ingrained human need to do things 'hands-on'. I mean, we even bitch about the things that we can't do because it's some limited-use rover on Mars and not a real person. There is a certain intuition to exploring, one which does not get fully utilised when acting through intermediaries.

Well controlling rovers from Earth will never give you the hands-on feeling, how advanced the techology may be ( except for maybe http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/releases/2003/4 … anglemant) due to the 10 minute communications lag.

#355 Re: Human missions » Bush and Mars and Re-election - Bush and Mars and Re-election » 2004-06-04 16:32:38

A note about French conduct in WWII. In 1940, they were simply overrun and gave up amidst the greatest confusion. We'd done exactly the same if we were in their shoes.
It has nothing to do with being dishonourable or such, at least not in my eyes (which I'm not saying you were implying).

You are right about this as many other european countries can confirm. However they could also have fought their asses off like the Russians and English did. However the Russians had no choice as Hitler wasn't to fond of Russians and English had an advantage of being an island. So I understand the French's actions.

#356 Re: Not So Free Chat » Random Thoughts About the FAR Future - Which copyrighted movie will it be like? » 2004-06-04 16:29:44

I also want to add that the poster forgot one option and that is: Indepence Day / War of the World e.g. were the aliens invade the Earth.

#357 Re: Not So Free Chat » Random Thoughts About the FAR Future - Which copyrighted movie will it be like? » 2004-06-04 14:57:19

I voted Contact but after readings Cobra Commander explanation. I agree with him. Human are violent by nature even with no real enemies we will make up one (be it human or alien).

So humans find this semi intelligent alien race and the humans have this war industry. The war industry will push towards a war so that they can get more orders.

We then universally become basically good people, who will work dilligently for the good of the galaxy (United under the Federation of Systems [Based at, oh, Bernard's Star, why not]) without any pay, because money doesn't exist anymore. I personally find this unlikely, because very few people I know would work very hard without a real, hard incentive in front of them.

Well with replicators and anti matter energy and plenty of liveable space (planets) money is useless. However I think you do know people that do work for free, just look at the open source people. And I think most scientists and musicians would do there work in their spare time. So its not that an alien thought.

However you will get people strugling instead of for more money for more power and influence.

#358 Re: Human missions » Bush and Mars and Re-election - Bush and Mars and Re-election » 2004-06-04 14:32:02

However, this was not done, partly because of ignorance, partly because the French were regarded as such 'goodies' having fought Hitler and all, and, after all, France was an important ally against Communism in Europe.

I never knew the French were so 'goodies' against the Nazies!? I mean they surrended and afterwards they worked together with the Nazies. And the war effort against the Nazies by those that opposed the Vichy government is nothing if you compare it to Russian, English, American, Canadian, Australian, Indian and colonies of the countries mentioned.

However they may have helped against the commies but that's just also in their own self interenst so not really out the good out of their hearts.

#359 Re: Science, Technology, and Astronomy » Space Stations - I don't see much about space stations » 2004-06-04 12:54:58

I do understand that the NASA has a limited budget. So it has to be very specific were to spend its money.

However it’s my idea that the colonies would become self-sufficient. So the only "things" that they need from Earth are humans and knowledge. So it will cost NASA nothing to operate the Mars base except perhaps sending the initial base.

The self sufficient Mars colony could then work towards expanding. It can by putting all its time and resources into building these space stations and more buildings on Mars. As it has no national defense, police force or other expenses that the US has it should not be a problem. Another reason why it’s possible because there is no money or private property in the initial Mars colony fase.  So all work done by the sciencetists, astronauts, engineers and mechanics is for free. Ok they may receive a salary on Earth but that’s not a big issue. I don't even think you need to pay them a salary (if they don't have family on Earth) as long as they get to do what they want they are happy. If they got family on Earth pay them $100.000 a year.

Launch those space stations from Mars and there you have a practically free space station.

1) A space station near/in the asteroid belt would be a very risky maneuver for what benefit?  I don't think we really need to risk billions of dollars and lives to mine asteroids.  What would you do with the mined material anyway?

You could use it to mine resources that are lacking on Mars. Such as Nitrogen.

2) Space stations are like the moon.  To go there would slow down a mission to mars.  Leaving the earth ships can accelerate to 3km a minute but if they have to go to the moon they can only go 1.5 km a minute then slow down (use fuel), land (use more fuel), get whatever, launch (use a lot of fuel) and accelerate (still more fuel).  It takes longer and wastes fuel for little benefit.

 
Well if you think about the x-prize, then you could use one of competitor’s ships to launch people to orbit and from there have them put on a Earth – Mars ship. It should be cheaper.

3) Holiday idea may work.  Would take money from the rich and give to the poor NASA scientists projects.

No comment

4) Zero gravity experiments are good, ongoing aboard ISS now and okay with me as long as they don't keep us from mars.

No as I think they should receive corporate funding from companies in for instance the semiconductor industry and pharmacy.

Please don't think that I want to establish some kind of communist state on Mars. It's just that those first people on Mars would be working for NASA which is like an engineer working in the Army. He gets his salary and perhaps a promotion if the bridge he build is good but nothing more.

#360 Re: Unmanned probes » Exploring more or getting something done? - To send probes or not to send probes... » 2004-06-04 12:07:28

Seriously, your preference to include long distance rovers (just in case things aren't how you expect them) is essentially combining choices one and two.  If you have a base with people, they will explore.  It won't be robotic probe style exploration, but it will still be exploration.  So the choices are simply:  1.  Explore with robots and don't send humans, or  2.  Send humans and explore more with them while building a base.

Yeah I agree with you that including those rovers would be kinda of cheating. However I was thinking for rovers like those moon buggies. So human operated.

#361 Re: Life on Mars » Does mars contain life? - Does it? » 2004-06-03 20:06:36

I haven't seen any proof that Mars has life on it or that was ever life on it, then there is proof of life in Venus's history. And the same counts for Jupiters moons.

#362 Re: Unmanned probes » Exploring more or getting something done? - To send probes or not to send probes... » 2004-06-03 19:55:13

To send probes or not to send probes that is the question.

Imagine you have limited budget and can only choose one of the two arguments to spend your money on:

1. Its time that we start building/using the knowledge that we have gathered so far. So lets spend the budget on building a Mars colony. So far we may have encountered situations slightly different then from what we predicted but we have calculated those risks into our mission plan. So humans on Mars are save from risks according our predictions.

2. Although we know more then we did before we still don't know a lot. Before you start thinking about building a colony. You should know what kind of exact resources are on that planet and at what quantities and locations. An educated guess is not the same as knowing. You just can't send humans into an environment where many things are not known. What if you count on having such and such resource only to know they were unique to the landing site of the rover? So for the time being send more scouts/probes and see what the data is.

Personally I would go for the first argument, as if live were so sure on Earth when then all those insurance policies? To make up for the unknown location of resources give the Mars explorers some highly mobile transportation units.

#363 Re: Human missions » Send inmates to mars - like in australia » 2004-06-03 19:30:19

I want engineers and mechanics to do the work.

Which is good and a lot better then sending a bunch of astronauts and sciencetists to do everything. However engineers and mechanics are a specialized trade and at the level of building and repearing the machines. Will they also mine the resources, take a shovel, get on there knees and lay a brick? And at the same time be an engineer/mechanic? Remember we don't have robots yet to do the dirty work.

Eventually that will happen.  However, you need a critical mass of people before you can aford to specialize very much.

You are already doing this with the engineers and mechanics. Next thing you want farm engineers working on the food production. This may work in a small colony but they will not have time to build something for future colonist or do any kind of other work.

It did not cost over $100 million each to send workers to the Hoover dam construction area.  With Mars, the costs may be that high, in which case it makes sense to send the best people that you can.

Well as long as it costs that much to send one human whatever his education to Mars, you will not see many humans on Mars either way. At that cost Mars is just a science outpost.
===

You did raise a lot of good points and I do agree with you if you are talking about a science outpost / settelement

#364 Re: Human missions » Send inmates to mars - like in australia » 2004-06-03 19:15:54

Absolutely! After setting up whatever "bombs" on which you've been working (in quotes because they wouldn't have to be explosives), as more colonists ("normal" colonists) start arriving, a very easy way to gain control over them would be threatening to activate them. "Do what I say or we all die."

We are talking about criminals here not the mob. Normal criminals are not that organized and the mob likes governments.

Do you really think that normal criminals are mass murderes?

On Mars, you have dangerously high levels of radiation, potentially toxic particulate matter in the soil and airborne dust, and even potential biological risks if indeed life does exist. Even getting there is hazardous.

A good point and exactly the reason why we will not see civilians anytime soon there to start building a serious colony.

And just how do you differentiate the two? What if I kill somebody just to be given a chance to go to Mars (of course I wouldn't tell anybody). Would that make me a psychopath? Or given that I personally think that killing is wrong and counterproductive to the advancement of humanity, it would be very easy for me to recognise that I was wrong in my crime.

How do you set up sufficient screening to determine that the person is a) not a psychopath (or even sociopath, but I digress...), and b) recognises that they were wrong in their crimes? And further, why are those the only two criteria?

Well if you think killing someone would get you a chance to Mars then you are wrong( how will you know that you are selected?). Basically I'm saying you will have problems sending civilians to Mars for the reasons you mentioned and the hard and dirty work needed. But its like the army you have a draft army and professional army. The draft being the inmates and professional army being people like you. If the professional army is big enough no need for the inmates.

About the screening how does the army screen? How does it know that private is not just about killing and cutting ears of x many enemies?

Do:  Be mindful of tracking in fines from the airlocks
Don't:  Destroy any potentially significant scientific findings

Yeah why not and have some images on the list. Like a man with a ripped mars suite and the second image of him reaching for his pocket and taping the hole.

#365 Re: Human missions » Send inmates to mars - like in australia » 2004-06-03 17:57:27

Construction workers on Earth do not have to wear space suits while they work, and they do not have to fix their machines when they break.

You are mistaken on Mars you should have just like on Earth specialized trades. You have people that use the machines, people that repeair, people that build them and people that design them. The inmates would be in the using and in some degree repairing class.

About the space suites. They are not like the space suites like they use on the space shuttle. So a better name would be Mars suites. And what’s so hard about wearing a mars suite? You got a leak? Then use duct tape. Basically just a document about what to in case of an emergency. Even mine workers and construction workers need to wear protective clothing and have some procedure in case of an emergency.

Airlocks and nuclear powerplants. Well they don't need to know how to build them. You will have specialized crews for them.

Let me give you an example relating to a documentary I saw recently. It was about the building of the Hoover dam and tunnel between England and France. Do you really think that all construction workers knew how to handle the heavy machinery and knew exactly what they were doing? Do you really think that construction workers working on the Hoover dam knew about every detail about the Hoover dam? I would think it's more like blow up these rocks, drill and pore cement, repeat the steps.

Again, you don't need workers that know everything like on earth. Or else why isn't a politician also doing a bypass on his wife, while doing the checkout at his local shop and after that cleaning his house?

You would not send of the shelf Earth machiens to Mars.  They would be too heavy, and would probably be unreliable in Martian conditions.

A good point and you will need people to mine the resources for those machines. From what I understand you want the sciencetists to do this. Remember unlike in Red Mars (the book) there are no autonomous machines.

The cost of getting people to Mars is so high that you can only send people that are completly qualified, or that can pay for their own transport cost.

Well we are talking about colonizing Mars. If only scientists or the very rich can go to Mars as the cost are too high. It will not be a colony. It would be like now on the ISS. I'm talking about an era just before colonization. Were people are going to move to Mars in great masses or we (the governments) want them to.

The day that I see scientists and the filthy rich getting their hands dirty working on buildings, roads and in mines on Earth. Is the day your arguments make sense.

#366 Re: Human missions » Send inmates to mars - like in australia » 2004-06-03 17:25:24

1. I suspect volunteers won't be hard to get, especially since if it costs tens to hundreds of millions to get someone there, we can afford to pay them a million or two a year to stay.

Well getting the first astronauts there might be easy and so the first hundred people but after that it gets harder. Especially people willing to do dirty, not respected labor. As its now in Western countries and why western countries import or rely on immigrants to do the dirty work.

2. If you're going to spend that much to get people there, you're going to train them extensively.

Train them for what? They just need to remove the weeds in a farm or pick the strawberries. Or they just need to spread the concrete for the new road with a handtool. They are not doing the higher level functions.

3. You don't want anyone on Mars who will murder others or leave both doors of the airlock open, so criminals seem a poor choice.

Well there is a chance for that but to be sure let all the criminals sleep in the same bunker and I can assure you they will control eachother.

This isn't a vast continent where anyone with a gun and an axe can clear a farm and make a living.

I don't understand this.

#367 Re: Human missions » Send inmates to mars - like in australia » 2004-06-03 17:17:30

So they'd be setting up the infrastructure, eh? And you don't think that in the lot of them there'd be any embittered and unscrupulous prisoners who would use that position to their advantage? I know I would.

What the heck are they going to do? Sabotage? Then they will die as they depend on the infrastructure them selfs.

Also, sending criminals to Mars to essentially do slave labour could easily qualify as 'cruel and unusual punishment.

Well slave labour. Its like the chaingangs or dismantling computers or doing helpdesk support (which prisoners already do). Remember this is all voluntary and about giving a second chance.

I'm not about sending psychopaths but people that reconize they were wrong in their crime(s).

Living on Mars successfully and building infrastructure will take a lot of training.  It may be difficult finding inmates with the skills necessary to survive.

I think that isn't doesn't take a lot if training. As much training as it takes to work in a mine on Earth. Just a list of do's and don'ts. And basically you will use the same Earth machines on Mars for doing construction.

#368 Re: Martian Politics and Economy » Languages - Parlo Italiano - What langauge should be the Official? » 2004-06-03 14:31:17

1100101110000100101001010101010001001000101001.

And then he said, "001011010001010".

That was the funniest thing I ever heard from a clown.

And also to allow to more complex expressions I suggest we add the following: AND NOT OR XOR INVERTED. ( I mean the logic not the words or else jsut stick to english)

#370 Re: Martian Politics and Economy » Should God be Exported to Mars? » 2004-06-02 21:11:39

Science is the only TRUE religion.  Why can't God have man evolve from a ancestor of the ape if He wants to do it that way?  Why wouldn't God begin everything with a bang?  It is the same, if you look upon it with an open mind.  Science and religion.  They are the same.

No what you are saying is that science facts can be adopted into religion. Like the english languange can use french words. The old idea that the Earth was flat was based on old science facts. Its just that religions adept slow.

And also you have many kinds of religions and not all deny evolution. There are also different kinds of atheisme. Some believe in no super being at all. Others believe that a super being was the force behind the bigbang and evolution from stardust-fish-monkey-human. 

Learn more about Atheisme http://atheism.about.com/library/FAQs/a … x.htm]here

#371 Re: Human missions » The First to Mars - Who will it be? » 2004-06-02 18:39:22

I suspect the Chinese view this next space race as a 200 year competition (tortoise and hare?) and they intend a re-play of that episode 500 years ago when their ocean going ships were burned. With our 4 year election cycle (and quarterly profit/loss statement mentality) we Americans are not well situated to fight or win such an extended conflict.

I'm sorry but I don't really believe that story about the the Chinese think in long term. I mean Mao killed a lot of people in his five years plans.

And also the NASA's new exploration plan or even its general plan is not based on today or tomorrow its has long view like any good government has.

#372 Re: Human missions » Send inmates to mars - like in australia » 2004-06-02 18:19:48

Sending criminals to Mars, eh? Okay, who do I have to kill? I mean, if that was all it took to get a ticket to Mars, I would definitely become encouraged to lead a life of crime just so that I could get there.

I wouldn't think that this would be something you'd want to encourage.

Ok you may want to go to Mars but the biggest part of Earth's population (who really don't care much for space and stuff) will not go until some basics are done.

And of course if there are enough volunteers that are willing to work in Mars mines, farms and do a lot of other physical and dangerous labor. Then there is no need for the inmates.

#373 Re: Martian Politics and Economy » Should God be Exported to Mars? » 2004-06-02 18:13:04

I think you are making some mistakes here. Science is not a religion so there is no following only facts and proove.

If you follow a scientist he is your priest although its not an offical religion but it to you it is.

You can't believe in scientists, believing is something personal, scienctists are about non argumental facts which have nothing to do with believing he is wrong or right. Like look here we have some really big bones that don't look like any mammals we know. Or the Earth is round proven by this fact/calculation or the sun is the center because of this fact and that fact. Were comes believing in this?

I read on some atheist site the comment / statement that religion was created to control people and it looks like that to me. However some people are now looking to science as some kind of religion. Like sciencetology is doing.

#374 Re: Human missions » Send inmates to mars - like in australia » 2004-06-02 16:09:55

Okay, I'll bite: Whatever made you think that one up??

Maybe he just reread "The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress" by Robert Heinlein.

No just learned from history, Austrialia and many sailors on the first ships were people they found here and there and prisons. And of course science fiction.

big_smile

#375 Re: Human missions » Bush and Mars and Re-election - Bush and Mars and Re-election » 2004-06-02 16:07:04

Russians killed their space shuttle program a long time ago. At least they have their priorities straight. And they of course are smart enough to let the US pay for the Russian part in the ISS  tongue .

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB