New Mars Forums

Official discussion forum of The Mars Society and MarsNews.com

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Announcement: This forum is accepting new registrations via email. Please see Recruiting Topic for additional information. Write newmarsmember[at_symbol]gmail.com.
  1. Index
  2. » Search
  3. » Posts by atomoid

#226 Re: Unmanned probes » Spirit & Opportunity*4* - continue here » 2004-03-02 04:35:19

LEFT CAMERA                           RIGHT CAMERA
7 = 432nm (32nm Short-pass)     1 = 436nm (37nm Short-pass)

So it makes sense that an L4 image would look quite different than a R4 one.

i guess that makes a lot of sense, so that every image taken with each of the pancams gives unique spectral data, wouldnt want to waste banwidth on any duplicate data so they spread the whole spectrum across the image passes in hope of highest contrast (resolution) per spectral sample...

unfortunately, the L0, R0, and L1 images of this sequence were not released (or even aquired?)... wonder why?

the L7,R1 pair that have that 5 nm disparity in the "short-pass"... (?)

The #2 filters should be a good stereo pair too?
L2 = 753nm (20nm bandpass)       R2 = 754nm (20nm bandpass)

#227 Re: Unmanned probes » Spirit & Opportunity*4* - continue here » 2004-03-01 21:27:15

Heres]http://www.msss.com/mars_images/moc/2004/02/09/03_R1400762sub.gif]Here's a good view of the small dark depression (its not really all that gloomy!) between the "hole-in-one" crater and the big crater. This little crater doesnt show up in [http://www.marsunearthed.com/Opportunit … Region.htm]the usually referenced MOC image. Its clearly visible in the orbital picture, and you can see it in [http://www.lyle.org/mars/imagery/1P1312 … 1.JPG.html]images showing the bright far wall of the big crater.

Speaking of which, the crater wall almost looks like its lit up by the sunrise -the sunlight having not yet lit up the soil in front of the lander. Note the different level of brightness of the far wall is much different in these pictures, for instance compare [http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/ … 94L4M1.JPG]the L4 image to [http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/ … 94R4M1.JPG]the R4 image

At first i assumed that the brightness of the wall is due to the filters affecting the apparent brightness due to mineral composition, however, these two images use the same filter #4, one from the Left camera and the other from the Right camera. Both images were taken at the same time, so aside from parallax affects, they should look the same but thats not what we see here... are the filters the same on the left and right cameras ???

#228 Re: Unmanned probes » Spirit & Opportunity*4* - continue here » 2004-03-01 20:34:08

At this low pressure, the water would boil away pretty quick, I'd guess. If the subsurface is a brine, exposed parts would boil dry, form an 'isolation' layer, made out of cristallized salts?

It is weird, everywhere Opp runs, there's white stuff underneath, but... that can't be all salts... That 'white' craterrim in the distance, can't be salts... Wouldn't last...

Waitaminnit... certain 'iron-salts' (dunno how to say that right in English, it is the iron-group, not necc. Fe) are water-soluble... But if they get exposed to UV they get non-soluble! And Mars has a lot of UV, no ozone layer... Being both rich in salt and iron... could that react into a sort of stable component? Forming a (semi-)weathering-proof layyer...

Ok, do take this with a pinch of salt (grin)

Apparent brine crusts at the Opportunity landing site were clearly visible in the first few pictures in the [http://www.keithlaney.com/OCI/V3.jpg]white stuff in the rivulets of that little circular depression (crater?) that the lander almost came to a rest on top of.

Salt crusts? i'd assumed so, and if so, the brine might creep to the surface if disturbed in some way such as a small meteorite or lander backshell impact, then it would dry out and solidify in the UV leaving a crust of dessicated brine in the bottom of these rivulets. would the salt be in crystaline form as we see on earth and thus tend to exist as larger particles? or maybe the UV and such breaks em up into fines...

On the other hand, the white stuff might blow in from elsewhere, it seems to have the consistency of talc by the way it sits nestled in the rivulets, so if the wind blows just right for long enough, this white substance builds up as the white deposits in this "crater", it might get blown away relatively quickly when conditions change, otherwise we'd see more of this stuff shouldnt we? and maybe we do, perhaps its just eroded bedrock material (whatever that is) and it normally just blows away to finely disperse, not usually collecting anywhere en mass... the white "brine crust" in the rover trench and the [http://www.freewebs.com/atomoid/CraterCrusties.jpg]"crater" crusts would be the same stuff in this scenario.

Unfortunately for some reason, the rover scientists didnt bother to investigate the "Crater" feature, so unless we get spectra of it, theres no way to tell if its the same material or not......

#229 Re: Unmanned probes » Spirit & Opportunity *3* - ...continued from previous threads » 2004-02-26 16:06:40

Looking at the latest gorgeous image from Spirit, looking back towards its lander...
[http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/ … A053R1.jpg]http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery....3R1.jpg

* On the same level as the aforementioned "dark boulder", and just above the right-hand side of a small, round, crater-like hollow seen above the rover's solar panels, there's a VERY bright object lying on the surface, just beneath a dark rock, which I can almost convince myself is reflecting sunlight in a quite metallic way... see it? None of the surrounding rocks - or, for that matter, anywhere on the image as a whole - have the same high albedo as this object, and it has me intrigued. Not suggesting for a MOMENT it's some kind of artefact, but it just looks strangely out of place, that's all I'm saying...

yeah, that bright white "bleached thigh bone" or whatever it is sitting on the dirt a few yards from where the rover drove past, hmmm, yes, yet another sttrange anomaly ignored and not explained by the rover team. heres [http://www.lyle.org/mars/imagery/2N1308 … 1.JPG.html]a couple more pictures of it. these images were taken on sol 50, [http://www.lyle.org/mars/imagery/stereo … 2340-N.jpg]heres the 3D anaglyph. I'd have to assume its some peice of the lander that broke off during the bouncing and rolling process -is the direction that the rover is going, the same direction that the rover and all its EDL parts came in from in from? it seems so...

if youll remember from the [http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/mer2004/rover-i … ge-12.html]lander and bouncemark location image that the parachute landed in a direction about 90 degrees to the left of the path of the rover. the backshell landed on the rim of Bonneville, where the rover is now travelling to as can bee seen [http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/mer2004/rover-i … ge-11.html]in the rover history graph
given that the lander and heatshield separated and diverged enough to touch down in about a 40 degree arc that the rover is now traversing across the center of, its likely that the "bleached bone" is a securing fastener or something that was ejected during the heatshield or parachute separation process and fell through the air to land here. there's likely to be a few more parts in our path if were lucky...

#230 Re: Unmanned probes » Spirit & Opportunity *3* - ...continued from previous threads » 2004-02-25 15:35:53

I knew there were skulls littered all over the place at the Spirit landing site that NASA has attempted to doctor out of the images (not only was it in the Enquirer, but Mars is the god of war, after all), but here lies the startling new proof that Mars is the Planet of the Apes! Its the fossilized head, helmet and all, of General Urko (or one of his hench-apes)!

#231 Re: Unmanned probes » Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) - rover » 2004-02-25 15:26:40

I'm not a space engineer, but i suspect that [http://www.space.com/businesstechnology … 218-1.html]Radioisotopic Thermal Generators might provide a better energy per weight ratio than solar panels for the baloon. They usually get electricity by heating dissimilar metals with the heat from the decaying plutonium, and since this process isn't that efficient, all that waste heat could be used to help increase the buoyancy of the gas in the ballon. but maybe its just not enough heat to make a dent in how big the baloon would have to be to carry the weight...

#232 Re: Unmanned probes » Spirit & Opportunity *3* - ...continued from previous threads » 2004-02-24 23:02:52

Interesting to note that long before the raw images go up on the [http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/ … unity.html]nasa rovers raw site they are up and viewable at [http://www.lyle.org/mars/]the lyle.org site

That RATed BB as in [http://www.lyle.org/mars/imagery/1M1308 … 1.JPG.html]this nicely sharp image with the striations accross it look like it might have merely been scraped by the RAT and then dislodged and turned a bit. Note that the other BB on the right shown no such scratch marks. there doesnt seem to be any noticeable concentric layering inthe BBs, which would point to concretions, i hope im wrong, i hope these dont just turn out to be boring tectites...

#233 Re: Unmanned probes » Broken spherele has dark spot inside it???? » 2004-02-24 21:05:20

there are all sorts of spherules on earth. one great example is the [http://www.utahphotowild.com/small/pages/small4.htm]Moki marbles (which are hematite-rich, even!)

but regardless of the that, these BBs really freak me out too!

I cant figure out why they havent tried to RAT into any of the Blueberry muffins yet to see if there is layering inside the BBs (which shoudl reveal whether theyre concretions or tectites)... geez, the rover could have suffered a fatal error condition in the time theyve spent getting around to finally doing this crucial science... hopefully we wont have to wait much longer...

But it really make my day how we're actually getting pictures back from mars like these that really freak us the hell out! Viking, Pathfinder, Spirit...all those pretty pictures are boring compared to what were getting here at Meridiani. I almost wish Opportunity had landed on the surrounding pan-flat and boring plains and had to make a traverse to get to this bedrock to build up to this kind of excitement, i'm expecting it will be a boring trip until we reach the big crater, although these ball berings are probably littered all over the plains as well...

I like [http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/ … 53M2M1.JPG]pea soup number 2 because you can see near the lower left there is a "socket" left from where one of the BBs fell out (who knows how long ago...). My impression is that these BBs arent moving relative to the "bedrock" they are in, they are just falling out as the bedrock dissolves around them...

#234 Re: Unmanned probes » Spirit & Opportunity *3* - ...continued from previous threads » 2004-02-24 18:39:49

Regarding the little 90 degree rock outcrop, its also in this [http://www.lyle.org/mars/imagery/stereo … 1351-F.jpg]3D view from afar (although slightly out-of-focus).
but best yet, in this [http://www.lyle.org/mars/imagery/stereo … 3625-N.jpg]3D view from above

You can see that this little ridge is pretty narrow and would, at first glance, appear to represent a collection of harder layers of the bedrock itself. I suspect that the meteor impact would have upheaved the bedrock at the crater perimeter to rest about 90 degrees from it original orientation like this. however, the orientation of this "harder layer" if it is such, appears to be perpendicular to the many smaller layers such as seen in this picture of [http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/ … 3M1M1.HTML] El Capitan from sol 29 right next to it, casting doubt that it is a collection of harder layers in the same plane, how could such a formation form? any geologists in the house? so its a "layer" that goes perpendicular to its constituent layers. probably eroded by "normal" forces (on mars even): that is, the softer rock goes away first if there are forces acting on it. well, we havent seen it up close yet, perhaps this rock is in a different orintation form the other rocks next to it, meaning some of the "bedrock" is really half-buried blocks that were tossed around by the impact and so many will reveal altering planes of layering in the current orientation from each other......so on it goes, each observation raising progressively more baffling questions... gotta love it!


-- Favorite quote of the day:
"The boss Colin.. ummm... forgotten his name... Professor Muttonchops...seemed to spend half of his time scrabbling around for funding."  --i was thinking about how much i wanted to go back to school and become a planetary scientist, then woke up...

#235 Re: Unmanned probes » Broken spherele has dark spot inside it???? » 2004-02-22 16:31:57

I think the dark spot is a vesicle, lots of the spherules show these spots, like little death-stars, if it were a tectite, then there i slikely to be trapped gas that escapes as the spherule cools, leaving a pock mark from the bubbles escaping as it cools. according to what another geologist said, concretions shoudl have no vessicles. Therefore the spherules argue to be tectites on this grounds, but i still think (hope at leat) that theyre concretions...

#236 Re: Unmanned probes » Spirit & Opportunity *3* - ...continued from previous threads » 2004-02-22 03:50:54

Something which caught my attention was at the top of that shot. It looks like some of those lighter coloured spherules are clinging to the almost vertical side of a rock face. They don't look like they've dropped out of the sky or been formed as part of a layering process, they look like they've 'deliberately' adhered to the side of the rock - like oysters or barnacles.

My first thought was that they were crater ejecta

could the spherical items be a harder mineral or other material that has not erroded at the same rate as the rock surrounding it?

i almost fell ou tof my chair seeing [http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/ … 33M2M1.JPG]this new micrograph image. the double spherule (blueberry) seems likely to be a concretion. i dont know if tectites can form as doubles like this... any geologists in the house?

if they are "tectites" (meteor crater ejecta droplets that harden into spherules as they travel through the air) they could have dropped in while the layers were being foemed, or could have least punched down deep as an episode after as the layers formed.

otherwise if they are concretions (layered condensates of minerals, like sandstone nodules or 
[http://www.utahphotowild.com/small/pages/small4.htm]MOKI marbles), then they formed after the bedrock was laid down so when the conditions were wet the minerals in the soil would disolve and form these.

the BB-sized spherules certainly seem to be mixed all the way through the bedrock, the bedrock is slowly being eroded, revealing the spherules as the rock dwindles, the spherules dropping off and accumulating in the soil and concentrating them at the surface as a desert pavement as the sand and dust gets blown away leaving lots of spherules behind.

there is a "rind" or some sort of mineral coating covering both the spherules in the bedrock as well as the [http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/ … 3M2M1.HTML]bird-track cracks picture which also suggests they are concretions.

and about those bird tracks... theyer looking even more like termite galleries than the last pictures of Snout, they look a bit like fossilized remnants of worm-holes or rock boring creatures of some sort?

#237 Re: Unmanned probes » Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) - rover » 2004-02-22 03:01:40

Drop the whole bundle with the usual parachute to slow descent, then fill a balloon from canister of liquid helium (or whatever works best), if the weight is calculated correctly it would slowly lower the lander, once its safely down, release the lander and the balloon can rise with camera, sensors and transmitter sending back nice atmospheric data and some reasonable images.
Surely adding something like this to a billion dollar project would cost peanuts.

it coudl be prety cheap for something really basic youd think, theres some proposal for a big expensive [http://marsprogram.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/balloons.html]Mars Balloon, one idea is to have a payload that can be directed to drop and ascend multiple times over its mission, dropping weather stations, seismometers (if they land a few they could image the core of mars if it has quakes) and other experiements, extending its mission for as long as possible by slowly dropping off this weight until it has no buoyancy gas left and ends up as a final destination station. youd have to be careful with the winds banging it into land features, it would be quite an adventure.

#238 Re: Unmanned probes » Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) - rover » 2004-02-22 02:16:46

I still think they oughta build TWO of 'em, -just in case...

Or they can always build an MER-style rover as a back-up, it should be relatively cheap to fit it in the budget, since all the hard work on the athena platform is all done and proven now it would just be a matter of sending a new copy, or better yet, budget in a little bit of work to fit a one with a few new instruments, maybe a drill like on beagle2 would have used, soil chemistry experiments...

we should keep sending one of these as a backup every launch window, it could be a safe-bet platform, or better yet take a chance on bouncing it down in a really [http://www.marsunearthed.com/Anaglyphs/3D151/3D151.htm]mind blowing place like [http://www.marsunearthed.com/Anaglyphs/3D66/3D66.htm]the Schiaparelli layers...

#239 Re: Unmanned probes » Spirit & Opportunity *3* - ...continued from previous threads » 2004-02-21 18:31:15

Imagine what the *initial* bouncemark must look like...
Incredible they had three consecutive successes, with this innovative approach. Hats off to the guys an' gals that designed those bags!

yeah, i hope they visit the 1st bouncemark for one of the rovers, even more so, i hope they visit the backshell impact site of spirit, its on the edge of the crater theyre going to "benneville" there should be some fresh deep stuff revealed there...

too bad the 4th airbag (beagle2) didnt make it, well have to see if they figure out what went wrong and if their airbag scheme was at fault or not (i wonder why Malin hasnt snapped a picture of the beagle2 landing site with the MGS MOC yet like theyve done for both of the MERs, it would help quite a bit in the process, I hope its not some stupid beaurocracy thing (NASA cant spend their money on "EUs problem" or something like that)...

#240 Re: Unmanned probes » Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) - rover » 2004-02-21 16:16:19

it seems a waste, it will proabably be programmed to fire the remainiing fuel to take it in a direction as far away from the lander as possible in fear of it crashing down onto the lander after it drops it.

But i'd hope especially since its in such a good close proximity to the lander that they might program it to soft land (not expect it to make it, ubt just give it a try like the vikings) and have its own telcom relay and simple pancam and telephoto lens on a mast so that if something went wrong during the lander drop off phase (probably the riskiest part), then we'd have at least an outside chance of being close enough to get a telephoto look at it and so would immensely help Nasa in troubleshooting the loss of a billion dollar probe.

i'd always thought they would put a simple lightweight camera and telcom relay on the MER lander shells just in case, so theyd have something else to try.

#241 Re: Unmanned probes » Spirit & Opportunity *3* - ...continued from previous threads » 2004-02-21 15:51:34

I have to admit I'm becoming rather addicted to the 3D images on "Mars Unearthed"... I think this is one of the best I've ever seen... what do you make of the layering in this boulder cluster?
-------------

There's already a whole torn chunk of airbag lying on the surface in one picture.

golly gee whiz, thatsa [http://www.marsunearthed.com/Spirit/Spi … lyph47.htm]one of the most beautiful exposures Spirit has taken yet!
The layering on tis boulder doesnt seem to be sedimentary in nature, more like fracturing from the meteor impact (my guess anyway).

Thats a great site, incredibly well-made images, i hadnt seen it before. I'd been using [http://www.lyle.org/mars/]http://www.lyle.org/mars/ to view all the automated anaglyphs and color reconstructions. the lyle.org has nice thumbnails but it isnt laid out quite as easy to use and they dont crop off the distracting overlap on their anaglyphs. thanks!

there's a facinating little pinnacle sticking up out of the soil near the bottom of [http://www.marsunearthed.com/Opportunit … y23_3D.htm]Opportunity's anaglyph 23 casting its own shadow that would be difficult to discern without anaglyphic perspective

- Regarding the "torn chunk of airbag lying on the surface" if its the "claw" thing in the color opportunity panorama (which happens to be the image i used for my member avatar at left here) my thoughts were it was peice of shrapnel from one of the pyrotechnics that released the rover from the lander. it looks like whats left after a firecracker explodes but by chance doesnt obliterate its paper casing but just splits it into a big peice of shrapnel. i hadnt considered it to be part of the airbag, it doesnt look like it has any frayed edges, just cleanly ripped edges. and it looks more like paper than a fabric...

#242 Re: Unmanned probes » Huygens Probe to Titan » 2004-02-21 06:00:37

Are the winds strong enough to whip up waves that will cut cliffs in the lakesides? Will they form steep beaches, or will the strong tides caused by Saturn's gravity be a bigger effect, forming wide, shallow tidal flats?

How deep are Titan's seas? This question bears on the history of Titan's atmosphere, which is the only other significant nitrogen atmosphere in the solar system, apart from the one you're breathing now.

And do the oceans have the same composition everywhere? Just as there are salty seas and freshwater lakes on Earth, some seas on Titan may be more ethane-rich than others.

It fascinating to consider islands and seas and any such differential features on Titan, but I'm wondering how such features would survive more than a few million years before they get eroded by all the methane rain, (if it does exist).

The only thing that keeps Earth from becoming a smooth ball of rock covered in a uniform globe-girdling sea after a few million years of ersion, is plate tectonics continually recreating the moutnains and plateaus and ridges, as well as a few volcanos.

It is doubtful there is tectonic activity on titan and therefore nothing to create such features, so Titan should be a pretty smooth ball, unless there is vulcanism or ice volcanism or ice plates moving around by tidal forces creating raised features. Or perhaps iceberg continents in a shallow sea of methane. I wonder if they track the positions of the light/dark areas to see if they move. I cant wait for the pictures!

#243 Re: Unmanned probes » Interstellar Probe » 2004-02-21 05:32:55

that snew to me, I had thought the only real work being done on a solar sail, was by the Planetary Society. The ~100 foot diameter test prototype "Cosmos 1" is set to launch as soon as the cheap converted russian surplus missile is ready to go... [http://planetary.org/solarsail/index2.html]http://planetary.org/solarsail/index2.html

czech it out --> [http://www.solarsail.org/]http://www.solarsail.org/

#244 Re: Unmanned probes » Spirit & Opportunity *3* - ...continued from previous threads » 2004-02-20 19:37:34

I looked over just about all of the Opportunity raw micrographs and found only [http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/ … 53M2M1.JPG]one image of these "threads", which is the same as the one used in the [http://www.space.com/php/multimedia/imagedisplay/img_display.php?pic=h_threads_marsopp_02.jpg?=Tiny%20%20thread-like%20%20objects%20have%20been%20spotted%20in%20several%20MicroscopicImager%20photos%20taken%20by%20the%20Opportunity%20Mars%20rover.%20What%20they%20are%20is%20apuzzle,%20although%20they%20may%20be%20fibers%20tossed%20into%20the%20area%20via%20spacecraftlanding%20bags.]Space.com article.

Note that this picture was taken on SOL 19. The rover was taking a micrograph of [http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/ … 11L0M1.JPG]this area at that time.
[http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/ … 22L0M1.JPG]This image shows the same area from a few feet back revealing a big airbag mark the rover was parked next to when it took the picture of the thread.
[http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/ … 11R0M1.JPG]This rear view shows the rover's position relative to the lander on SOL 19.
heres a new [http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/ … 12R0M1.JPG]picture of the area where the rover took the micrograph

The "thread" in the micrograph looks like a hair. Human hairs are about 50 microns in diameter.
The airbags are made from [http://www.vectranfiber.com/index1.html]Vectran fibers, which are about half that size, 23 microns in diameter.
im not sure how to deduce the size of the "thread" from the micrograph, anyone?

Is it that likely for an airbag fibre to come out of its weave?
The thread looks to be on the surface, but also appears it could be embedded in the soil. If they were a product of crystal growth or created by some lifeform, there should be more of them sticking in the walls of the trench or in other micrographs of the surface. So maybe Mars is where Donald Trump's hair went, or maybe this is all an elaborate hoax and someone on the set let a production person's human hair get into the photgraph by mistake, i guess they arent using a clean room for the studio!

#245 Re: Unmanned probes » Many factors could point to biology on Mars » 2004-02-20 16:54:34

You won't see water pooling in the trenches for other reasons:

- water pooling requires a water table. the water table on Mars has got to be pretty low by now. Note that Spirit is not in the lowest part of its environment as evidenced by the rolling bumps and ridges all around it, if there were a water table there would be ponding in the lowest parts. Maybe in the past that scenario was true, but now, any ponds have dried up, leaving the water table lower than the lowest land feature.

- If the water is a brine, then it should still migrate underground  over millions of years to the lowest point of equilibrium, so we shouldnt expect to see an equal distribution of liquid water below any part of the frozen surface ice crust. the flowing brine would create pressure and still well-up in the lowest part regardless of any ice cover insulating it. perhaps this sceario was true in the past there should be discernable evidence of it visible from orbit.

- The water is most likely to be bound up as a very very thick brine, more like very salty moisture that doesnt flow around freely but just sticks to the soil particles, just barely enough water to salty mineral ratio to keep it from evapoating, sublimating or flowing, otherwise it would have been long-gone by now, and maybe thats what happened, there used to be lots of water with disolved mineral salts and it evaporated away until it reached a thick enough solution to not be taken away by these mechanisms, since it is insulated from light and wind by cover of a "desert pavement" of pebbles and dry cohesive crusts. The thick brine sticks the soil particles, holding them togehter and giving the observed muddy quality, a state which perhaps might last indefinately if its not disturbed too much, until the rover's wheel disturbed it and exposes it to sunlight and wind, then we'd expect this mud to soon dry out more and detach from the rover's wheel, unless it dries and hold together as a cake, but it still wont get a good grip oon the aluminum wheel, it should fall off soon even on its own, if not by driving it off by roling the wheel.

- conversely, i'm not sure if there is any liquid water below the surface, it may all be ice, where would heat come from? theres not much geothermal activity (that we know of). i think mars is likely to be freezing below ground level, i'd expect the warmest moisture to be at and just below the surface where the heat of the sun warms and frees it from its frozen state. it might freeze every night and the amount of moisture in the soils is small enough that this doesnt cause any permafrost-like freeze/thaw features to form as would be expected in such a case.  there would still be a net loss of moisture to the air in this scenario, progressively dessicating the top layers of soil.

- perhaps the brine is enough to keep the moisture un-frozen even all the way below ground and there is a sort of brine-table with higher concentrations of water further down below still waiting to be discovered. if its big enough, there shight be some mark of this visible from orbit, slumping or susidence perhaps as it slowly loses volume over the eons.

[http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/ … 00R0M1.JPG]http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery....0M1.JPG

#246 Re: Unmanned probes » Spirit & Opportunity *3* - ...continued from previous threads » 2004-02-18 20:01:07

Some burning questions for further digression:

The odd thing is that Opportunity sees essentially flat rock-free plains around it, no big rocks anyway. Shouldn't we expect many more rocks on the surface since there seem to be plenty of craters from which rocky ejecta from deep below any presumed overlying soils should have been hurled at the time of impact? if so, the rocky ejecta shoudl be somewhere.

Or have the rocks since been covered over by the soil we see today?

Was the Meriadiani surface at the time of the impacts just a bunch of soil (ash, mud, dust) and so no rocks to toss, even from deep down? But if there were no rocks to hurl around, then where did all that soil get created from?

Was Meridiani covered by water (or ice) at the time of the crater impacts? Meridiani is now a very gentle slope so it doesnt seem to be a lakebed unless the surface has since subsided

#247 Re: Unmanned probes » Many factors could point to biology on Mars » 2004-02-18 19:50:50

The bedrock is sulfur-rich. 2 "official" theories remain about the spherules: tectites or concretions.
What do these scenarios mean for life?

- [Ash/Tectites] The bedrock may be sulfur-rich volcanic ash, in which case the spherules are likely created by meteor impacts (as tectites) and are dispered either while the ash layers are growing, or the spherules may be much newer than the layers and merely have punched down benath the soft surface. The bedrock may have been heated by the meteor impacts and subsurface ice might have even melted to wet and cement the layers into the apparently soft matrix we see today.
Life as we expect it has little chance in this scenario since its not wet or warm very long.

- [Dust/Concretions] The bedrock is built up of of dust layers and has been percolated by geothermal (sulfur-rich) moisture, the spherules are nucleations from disolved minerals (concretions).
Life as we know it has a good chance since its wet a fairly long time and a good niche energy source exists (heat differentials and sulfur).

- [Hybrid environment of above] The bedrock is alternating proportions of ash and dust (might help explain the termite galleries and erosional difference in the layering), and both geothermal heating and crater impacts have percolated water around. Either tectites or concretions exist (they should look somewhat different from each other if they are created differently, and we dont see this). The sulfur could come from both processes.
Life would seem to have a similar chance as above.

What else... any budding exobiogeologists out there?

#248 Re: Unmanned probes » Spirit & Opportunity *3* - ...continued from previous threads » 2004-02-17 03:41:18

In response to Remcook's point about the lack of haematite where the airbags have bounced, I'm prepared to throw in an explanation.
    I mentioned previously that the regions of the regolith affected by the impact of airbags seemed slightly raised, at least to me (maybe I'm wrong, I'm not sure). An explanation occurred to me, which I put forward at the time, based on the notion that the regolith has briny water mixed in with it, quite close to the surface.
    I continued by comparing the pressure of the impact of an airbag with the effect of a human foot on wet beach sand at the edge of the sea. Initially, the pressure of a foot causes a 'dry' area around it and then water wells up from below when the pressure is removed.
    Imagine a similar effect on Mars. The sub-surface brine, in the process of welling up after the airbag has moved on, might create a muddy briny slurry, which soon freeze dries in the thin cold martian air. This would explain the 'magic carpet', which surprised NASA, and might help with the haematite question too.
    I'm assuming the haematite granules are denser than the other material in the regolith. So, when the surface is temporarily converted into a briny slurry, the heavier haematite granules sink while lighter material floats to the surface, thus obscuring the haematite.

The thinner hematite signature in the inside than in the outside of the crater and the airbag bounce marks: [http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/ … R1_br2.jpg]http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery....br2.jpg

---- About the crater being lower inhematite than the surrounding plains:
Perhaps since this hematite is coarse-grained and doesnt get moved around much by wind, its either existed at the surface since it was created or there has been a net wind removal of the fine sediments above and below it, exposing and concentrating the hematite and other larger grains at the top as litter on top of the dust, like desert pavement. (this also means that wherever you find a crater with less hematite in its basin, that crater should be newer than the hematite layer since its been blasted elsewhere and cleaned below the original hematite layer to expose the hematite-poor bedrock). that is, unless the observed redder and higher concentration of hematite in the distance is merely due to visual trick of apparently packing the grains at eyelevel height since they stand up in relief perspective on top of the dust, these exposed hematite grains give a stronger return in the distance than the closer collections of hematite grains do since they make up less of a cross-section of the closer perspective since there is more space visible between grains. in this case the crater might be much older than the hematite which has a uniform distribution inside and outside the crater.

---- About the airbag marks being low in hematite:
-Maybe the airbag impressions remove the hematite signature because the hematite grains got pressed into the surrounding dust, obscuring them from detection.
-Maybe they are very light and were blown away by the bounce.
-Maybe the dust is low in hematite and it got kicked up to coat the hematite grains in dust, reducing their signature.
-Maybe the hematite grains are "sticky" in some way, either prickly texture or static charge, and got picked up and carried off by the airbag material as it rolled over. in such case the airbags should show up bright with hematite.

#249 Re: Unmanned probes » Spirit & Opportunity *3* - ...continued from previous threads » 2004-02-17 02:40:38

[http://www.lyle.org/mars/imagery/1P1296 … 1.JPG.html]http://www.lyle.org/mars/imagery/1P1296 … 1.JPG.html

look at the rock over to the right at x 800 y 700

the 'bedding planes' are edge on roughly towards us on this rock, but there is a curved flattish tapering  tube in a 'W' shape on the surface of the rock which cuts across the bedding plane. If thats just an erosional feature, it's pretty freaky as the bedding does look to be running underneath it. We could do with a better close up to figure this one out.

Yow, it can be hard to see until it pops out at you loud and clear, that really is weird... check it out in 3D -->
[http://www.lyle.org/mars/imagery/stereo … 3774-P.jpg]http://www.lyle.org/mars/imagery/stereo … 3774-P.jpg
[http://www.lyle.org/mars/imagery/stereo … 4487-P.jpg]http://www.lyle.org/mars/imagery/stereo … 4487-P.jpg
if you cant find the "W" consult: [http://www.freewebs.com/atomoid/theW.jpg]http://www.freewebs.com/atomoid/theW.jpg

i first felt this might be some perceptual artifact of a curved part of the bedrock layers (warped layers like occur in terrestrial folded rocks, but that begs the question: tectonic folding on Mars?? Mars doesnt show much history of this and even if so, could the embedded spherules survive this process? but i digress, anyway...)

But it really does look like its pasted on top of the main layer sequence beneath it, especially in the middle of the "W", im baffled...
need a closer look... not just that feature, but also the severely eroded rock just below it.

ACTUALLY, I have a more concise theory on this, but dont spread this or theyll implant a computer chip in my brain, and even you might end up lost or at least with some "missing time"... You know the Enquirer says they found all these skulls on Mars, it was on the front page! skulls all over the place! its true! the "W" written here must be the real reason behind george "W" bush's initiative to go to mars, because I now know, through secret sources in teh russian government, that in 2032 the chinese military creates a time machine and goes back into the past to kidnap george w bush and transpotrs him to mars billions of yaers ago, a time when earth and mars were similar and the harmonic convergences of their contigency-streams can be coalesced into a quantum similarity and thus divergence form an anti-earth was diverted. After transporting GW Bush to mars they reconstructed an anti-bush or shall we say pseudo-bush, from the quantum entanglement of the mars-earth paradigm, this unified dichotomy resulted in a reality that superimposes ours, thus the chinese government controlls Bush in this future Earth to do their own bidding. Needles to say, this non-linear event confuses the whole time continuum (and thats why the remote viewers cant see it), and upon learning of this (via a narrow beam transmission to the present day white house via a chinese defector from the future using the same secret technolgy), the bush administration decides we need to go to mars before 2032 inorder to recover george bush's skull and reconstruct his correct dna resonance and thus have some chance of restoring our universe and timeline. its no coincidence! thats why nasa is keeping the skulls and this "W" a secret! George W Bush, after being beamed to mars billions of years ago, survived just long enough to write his moniker on the rock outcropping you see before you today. His skull lies elsewhere known only to the Enquirer and those who read it. I suggest you buy your copy today! dont delay! enquiring minds NEED to know!! <B>

Visited by Moderator 2022/03/08

#250 Re: Unmanned probes » Many factors could point to biology on Mars » 2004-02-16 23:45:02

regarding the moved and "LOCKED" post: (OSTEOBLAST BONE CELL FOSSILS?) which reads: If you look closley at the image of Snout it looks like a chain of segmented single cell organisms are linked together near the leading edges of the layers that are protruding out a bit. You can see them just above, and to the left of the spherule.They blend in pretty well to the rest of the formation because the color is very close.It would be neat if those were bone cells? ANY THOUGHTS OUT THERE? [http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/mer2004/rover-i … 51-med.jpg]http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/mer2004....med.jpg

I put this comment here because it deals with the same underlying issue.
The "segmented" appearance of the edges of the bedrock looks like mineral deposits to me.

From looking at the layer structure its hard to say whether this its fragile or is somewhat well-cemented? sculpted into its "termite gallery" appearance by wind action?

Most peculiar is the bumpy texture. From looking at the surface there does seem to be a bumpy "lizard-skin" rind that reminds me of the mineral coating on rocks that linger below a trickle of mineral-laden water. I have collected several rocks that have very similar bumpiness as this. I would expect wind action to take away this bumpiness over time, for instance, i wouldnt expect to see the hairline features between the bumps since wind action should be smoothing all these type of features out, not creating them. the hairline intersection between the bumps seems to suggest they are mineral precipitate.

Maybe the rind formed by minerals in solution when under cover of soil. Or perhaps the heat of the impact melted permafrost and disolved minerals and it remained liquid enough to mineralization the shattered bedrock. I'm not sure if this would give you the termite galleries but wind action doesnt seem to explain them ither. Intersting to consider, but I dont know if microorganism action is important or not on Earth in promoting bumpy precipitate forms like this. anyone?

I'm hoping soon they will press the arm into this stuff or drill it and look underneath the surface of the spherules and the matrix at the bumpy areas to see if there is a rind or not...

heres the example: [http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/ … 33M2M1.JPG]http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery....2M1.JPG

  1. Index
  2. » Search
  3. » Posts by atomoid

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB