New Mars Forums

Official discussion forum of The Mars Society and MarsNews.com

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Announcement: As a reader of NewMars forum, we have opportunities for you to assist with technical discussions in several initiatives underway. NewMars needs volunteers with appropriate education, skills, talent, motivation and generosity of spirit as a highly valued member. Write to newmarsmember * gmail.com to tell us about your ability's to help contribute to NewMars and become a registered member.

#1 Re: Planetary transportation » Automatic or Manual Transmission - Moon/Mars Rovers » 2006-11-21 05:58:06

 
Mitsubishi In-wheel motor Electric Vehicle;

The in-wheel motor makes it possible to regulate drive torque and braking force independently at each wheel without the need for any transmission, drive shaft or other complex mechanical components.

http://media.mitsubishi-motors.com/pres … l1269.html

Complex electronics, simple mechanics.
 

#2 Re: Planetary transportation » Hydrogen Car Powered by Expansion of Liquid H2 » 2006-11-20 06:58:42

where does the energy come from when you put the stuff in your tank? It comes from ambient heat around the vehicle

Car.gifPlumbLine.gif

Similar to above diagram, the heat exchanger would be a CO2 snow maker.
Maybe, coat the heat exchanger with teflon to prevent sticking.

Latent heat of vaporization of one cubic meter of liquid H2 ;
http://www.uigi.com/hydrogen.html
71*446/3600 =  8.8 Kilowatt hours.
In addition, there is the gas phase Specific Heat (Cp) = 14.34  kJ/kg °C
(71*14.34/3600 = 0.28 KWH / m^3 °C)
which also contributes, at lower fficiency.
 

#3 Re: Planetary transportation » Hydrogen Car Powered by Expansion of Liquid H2 » 2006-11-14 18:42:16

Compressed gas & liquified gas pneumatic motors are a good idea for vehicle power.  I'm not sure about the wisdom of holding out for exotic liquid hydrogen when you can just use the ambient air as your working fluid, though.

Choices are Hydrogen and Oxygen from the water. CO2 freezes out.
We might see the Hydrogen economy on Mars before Earth.
A few extra kilometers from expansion before the gasses are used in a fuel cell ?

#4 Re: Life support systems » Protein Sources in First Colonies - An idea » 2006-11-14 10:55:50

Protein Poisoning is more of a problem than deficiency:
http://www.arthritis-back-knee-pain-fre … otein.html

On various islands in the Pacific are tribes of people who have followed the same diet for dozens of generations; fruits, roots and tubers. They enjoy excellent health and consume about 15 grams of protein a day.
http://www.rawfoodexplained.com/protein … -need.html

Algae and fungi for maximum use of resources.
Add large variety of grains.
Eat the snails and goldfish in the aquarium.
And for more muscle, try a big earthworm.
http://www.google.com/search?q=largest+ … era&rls=en

Astronaut training, for those few who enjoy the diet.
Only short monks, with a small rice bowls, need apply ?

#6 Re: Terraformation » Thoughts on producing an atmosphere on the Moon » 2006-06-06 15:42:26

 

Arizona should be terraformed or evacuated

Saddam's curse is the US version of the Midas touch.
People commute endlessly to get away from each other.
And it all turns to pullution.

With all the sunlight, Arizona is a good place to paraform a Garden of Eden.
Martian style greenhouse living, a most modern and efficient city.
 

#7 Re: Terraformation » Thoughts on producing an atmosphere on the Moon » 2006-06-05 16:31:55

 
Air quality is not well regulated.
People get used to the smog slowly killing them.
Smog is worse in the summer.
http://www.weathersmith.com/index.html?WsSmogPics.html
http://www.scorecard.org/env-releases/c … te_code=04

If Arizona had more rain, pollution would be washed from the air.
 

#8 Re: Human missions » Ion to Mars » 2006-06-05 05:05:37

 
I see it in 2 steps.

Near Earth,
High power engines for low Earth orbit insertion.
Present designs, and possibly beamed power later.

Interplanetary,
Ion drive and plasma engines are here, but without a high power source.
Solar power satellites are needed to beam the power, but the cost is high.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_power_satellite
 

#9 Re: Human missions » Engine Pod Economics » 2006-06-05 04:35:20

 
Recycling is $$$ driven.
Drive a new car and soon the value is considerably less.
Each time it is repaired, you recycle it to yourself.
Eventually it becomes scrap metal value.

The only reuseable spacecraft is the space shuttle.
The concept did not turn out as well as intended.
Perhaps, need larger numbers before the design is perfected.
 

#10 Re: Terraformation » Thoughts on producing an atmosphere on the Moon » 2006-06-05 03:58:32

http://www.google.com/search?hs=f4&hl=e … tnG=Search

Fog sinks.
But if you could design a molecule with directional kinematics.
Absorb incoming light molecule, then eject toward gravitatinal attraction.
Floating the utility fog molecule, forming a containment vessel.
 

#11 Re: Terraformation » Terraforming Mercury - Is anyone this crazy? » 2006-06-04 22:21:10

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Merc … de_Lmb.png
If you excevated one pole and piled it up on the other pole,
would the core be eventually exposed ?
Atmosphere would collect at the bottom.

#12 Re: Terraformation » Rapid Terraforming... - ...the most ambitious ideas? » 2006-06-04 22:05:18

basic block is a cubic cell

Better is supporting cables forming equilateral triangles.
If a vertex gets knocked out, then tension is transferred
to the perimiter of a hexagon.

I saw an apartment building with 3 hallways radiating from the center.
A 10 storey building could be placed at each corner of the honeycomb.
http://insectzoo.msstate.edu/Curriculum … ycomb.html

Looks possible to build a relatively safe and large city.
 

#13 Re: Terraformation » Terraforming Mercury - Is anyone this crazy? » 2006-06-03 01:12:16

The whole could potentialy be of extreamly large size because Mercury's gravity is very weak

Similar surface gravity as Mars.
On Earth, ocean bottom to top of Mt. Everest around 20  km.
On Mercury, max differential around 50 km ?
Then dig caves and tunnels for another 50 km ?

Good idea to use orbital mirrors as the landscaping tool, vaporize to form valleys.

With solar intensity 24 times that of Mars, thermal management is the key.
Without an atmosphere, you could get very innovative.
 

#14 Re: Terraformation » Rapid Terraforming... - ...the most ambitious ideas? » 2006-06-03 00:38:16

Interesting, karov has a similar approach to the same problem.

     Pressure vessel design (tubes and spheres) necessary on Mars but not Earth.
     Shielding with light elements (Hydrogen, possibly Boron) reduce secondary emission.

Clear plastic is probably not a great choice for mars, but lots of other similar materials can be used.

     Plastic has lot of Hydrogen atoms. Proton is similar mass to neutron. Good momentum transfer. 
     However, light pipes may provide a way to allow light while blocking radiation.

The reason why here now on Earth we don`t have too much geodesic domes is that such structures are with complex for prognosis structural behavoiur

     On Earth you only have to design for gravity.
     On Mars for gravity and pressure (hoop stress).

That`s why perhaps the simplest and most known tech would be "horizontal"

     Pressure up and down cancel, eliminating hoop stress.

============================================

Building big on Mars is inviting catastrophy. Perhaps only smaller sections which could be sealed off. Probability of large meteor hit should be greater than a million years. What is maximum radius for that ?
     

#15 Re: Human missions » Engine Pod Economics » 2006-05-22 21:00:40

 
Design a reuseable booster:
Beamed power, multiple stages, ending with a chemical rocket for last stage.

Sled Launched, ramp to space is possible, but expensive and long time to build.
 

#16 Re: Terraformation » Rapid Terraforming... - ...the most ambitious ideas? » 2006-05-22 20:09:45

In order to simplify have to go back to karov's ideas of

Geodesic - triangles for stability
Water layer on top for shielding

======================

10 km radius ring
cables from 3 different directions, to form the triangles
Water jacket on top, to balance air pressure
3 sided towers at each cable intersection  ?

======================

Then destroy as many meteors as possible in space.
Figure out how to repair damage from the ones that get through.

#17 Re: Terraformation » Rapid Terraforming... - ...the most ambitious ideas? » 2006-05-18 17:52:23

steel <5 GPa
Nano 130 GPa
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maraging_steel
http://physics.uwstout.edu/StatStr/Stat … cols65.htm
Hoop Stress = P R / t

Theoretical limits
Assume steel 1 GPa
Ground level radius of 1 meter thick steel enclosure

R = 10^9  1 / 101,325 pascals = 10^4 meters = 10 km

Carbon Nanotube 100 times greater or 1,000 km

Something large is possible, but details and safety ??
How to design self healing compartments ?

#18 Re: Martian Chronicles » I'm Wanting To Write A Book About Manned Mission To Jupiter » 2006-05-15 16:12:18

 
Instead of water, the working fluid is protons and electrons.
Hydrogen bonds have collapsed but other bonds are stronger.

The monsters spend their time watching TV from Earth and
designing alternate fluid bodies with their quantum computers.

Then a solution is found.
 

#19 Re: Terraformation » Rapid Terraforming... - ...the most ambitious ideas? » 2006-05-15 15:41:40

One solution is to have dome curvature radius same as Mars.
No horizontal forces.  Honeycomb cells, structure able to withstand meteor strikes.
If one honeycomb is punctured, then other cells expand, filling hole till repaired.
But need dynamic compensation. Similar to adaptive optics telescope.

Geodesic dome would be optimal for constant gravity and pressure.
But decreasing pressure with height gives other shape (flat top).
Top part under tension, bottom under compression.
Optimized space frame ? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_frame

Dome in the sky, in the shape of pie in the sky ?
 

#20 Re: Martian Chronicles » I'm Wanting To Write A Book About Manned Mission To Jupiter » 2006-05-15 01:21:27

 
http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/galileo/jupiter/interior.html

A Sea of Liquid Hydrogen 40,000 km deep, metallic.
What kind of monsters devising ways to get out ?
 

#21 Re: Life support systems » Power generation on Mars » 2006-05-15 00:50:44

Assuming permanent habitation of a Martian base.
All depends on the power grid. Generation, storage, useage.
Nuclear for initial convenience, but solar cells for expanded capabilities.
Windmills and solar chimneys for dusty periods ?
Storage via batteries, Hydrogen and Oxygen for fuel cells, and thermal.

Since it will be a long time before humans arrive,
manufacturing and construction robots could prepare for comfort.

#22 Re: Terraformation » Rapid Terraforming... - ...the most ambitious ideas? » 2006-05-14 22:13:11

spherical_cap.gif
Spherical cap shape has problems.  Is it possible ? Worth the efffort ?
Slowly inflate as stadium air domes on Earth ?
Cables to ancor each portion ?

With double layer plastic sheet dome , filled with 26-30 meters of water between...

Living under a giant fish tank, with shielding and food production right above.
Practical when small, but how to scale up ?

Ground hugging solutions are easiest.
Perhaps only several meters high.
 

#23 Re: Terraformation » Rapid Terraforming... - ...the most ambitious ideas? » 2006-05-14 09:37:45

How to contain the pressure ?
On Earth, one atmosphere is 10 meters water pressure.
On Mars it would be 10/0.38= 26 meters.

Network of cables, holding down the roof ?
Army of Martian dust sweepers ?

#24 Re: Martian Chronicles » I'm Wanting To Write A Book About Manned Mission To Jupiter » 2006-05-11 05:18:17

science documentary movie film on location Jupiter

How did you get the on location scenes ?
Did the creatures in the metallic hydrogen assist ?
What is the temperature at the core ?

#25 Re: Terraformation » Terraforming Mercury - Is anyone this crazy? » 2006-05-08 15:33:54

Colonizing yes, Terraforming needs innovation.

Change rotation so one side always faces the Sun.
    Tidally locked as the Moon.
    Water and gasses would settle out on the dark side.
    Habitable zones at poles and light dark division.
    Underground complexes at thermal comfort levels.
    Excevate 20 km down and build 20 km mountains to trap atmosphere.
    large mirrors on the mountaintops would reflect sublight.
    Crash comets for volatiles.

Spin up Mercury so it becomes a disk.
    Reduced sunlight, but gravitationally complex.
    A way to turn Mercury inside out.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB