New Mars Forums

Official discussion forum of The Mars Society plus New Mars Image Server

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Announcement: This forum is accepting new registrations via email. Please see Recruiting Topic for additional information. Write newmarsmember[at_symbol]gmail.com.
  1. Index
  2. » Search
  3. » Posts by Calliban

#1 Re: Not So Free Chat » Politics » 2026-01-23 11:06:22

kbd512 wrote:

They don't truly need to be.  That was my point, and it is factually true.  America has all the manufacturing and tech required to do it completely domestically, whether it's typically done that way or not.  Do you know who else does as well?  Canada and Mexico.  All 3 nations have all the metals, plastics, rubbers, and electronics manufacturing facilities, small though they may be in certain cases, that 100% American made or 100% Canadian made or 100% Mexican made vehicles are achievable using ONLY existing domestic manufacturing facilities already in operation.  These vehicles won't all be precisely equivalent, but they would still be 100% functional passenger motor vehicles.

We know that this is true, because we have done it before.  The UK once had several car companies.  We made our own fighter jets.  We even built our own space launch vehicles under the Black Arrow programme.  Canada could do it as well.  The problem is that cars and fighter jets have grown more and more complex.  And development cost has increased accordingly.  But a very simple car could even be homemade.  So any competant nation could build a workable car of good quality.  Just maybe without all of the superfluous electronics.

#2 Re: Science, Technology, and Astronomy » Planetary Cores and potentials for geothermal power. » 2026-01-23 08:49:55

Mars has a thicker crust, a more rigid mantle and no extant plate techtonics.  But recent discoveries have shown that there are extant magma plumes within the Martian mantle that do reach the surface.  But only in a few locations.  Geothermal power on Mars is only realistic in specific locations.  The area to the south of Elysium appears to be one such area.  Unfortunately, it also appears to be the most seismically active part of Mars.  Not ideal if you want to build an underground base.

#3 Re: Not So Free Chat » Politics » 2026-01-23 08:39:12

A close alliance of Canada, UK, Australia, NZ, could potentially punch at the same weight as the US, miltarily.  We would still have only half of the population.  But more land and natural resources overall and a better position to project power.  If someone from France, Germany, Japan, Mexico, Latin America, Russia or China, proposed an alliance capable of replacing the US, it would be hubris.  But for Canada, UK, Australia, NZ, it is a realistic proposal.  But only if we combine our resources.  The old British empire was a UK centric creation.  Given that Australia and Canada are now peer powers, all three would be equal partners.  I think CANZUK could do just as good a job of colonising Mars as the US.  If we can work with the US on that project, it becomes more realistic for all of humanity.

#4 Re: Not So Free Chat » Politics » 2026-01-23 07:14:35

RobertDyck wrote:

Ballotpedia: Presidential candidates, 2024
For the 2024 US presidential election, there were 24 candidates. You didn't have to chose between Satan vs Beelzebub. Media may claim only 2 parties, but those are the ones that pay mainstream media billions of dollars. You don't have to vote for the ones that bribe media. Why didn't you vote for the Libertarian candidate?

Robert, Donald Trump is actually a godsend in disguise for Canada.  Let me explain why.

The combination of Trump trade policies, BREXIT and Chinese aggression against Australia, raise a geopolitical opportunity for the CANZUK alliance.  The combined populations of Canada, UK, Australia and NZ are greater than 150 million - that is half the population of the US.  All are wealthy, educated, first world countries.  Collectively, this alliance would be the third largest economy on Earth, would control about half of the worlds natural resources and would be in a position to police and control all of the worlds major trade routes.  These four countries need to work together to produce a powerful, global nuclear navy.  Once that is done, we can approach other nations like Singapore, Egypt, Panama, Sri Lanka and ultimately Japan.  With those countries part of the alliance, we control the routes of trade and basically rule the world.  But Canada, UK, Australia and NZ need to form a close alliance supported by a strong nuclear navy to be a credible partner for these countries.  Individually, none of us can do this and they wouldn't take us seriously as a security guarenteur.  But all four of us can, by working together to build that world-spanning nuclear navy.

Donald Trump has proven to be very useful.  America is withdrawing from the world stage and Trump's style of diplomacy and extortion is alienating allies that were previously tight with the US.  That includes many countries hosting US bases, that could later become CANZUK bases.  Trump is the perfect catalyst for bringing into being an alliance that could ultimately supplant the US as the dominant world power.  Our four nations working together are the only ones in a position to do this.  Russia cannot do it.  Neither can China, given its internal problems.  All four white commonwealth countries are needed to do this, because we need the population, industry, resources and consumer base of all four.  We ideally need conservative governments in all four countries to kick this off.  Given the direction of travel, that is entirely possible.

This would have been much more difficult without Donald Trump.  If he wants to continue strong arming and bullying foreign allies, I say we let him, even encourage it.  In 20 years, we could be in a position to approach those countries with a better deal and a navy equivelant to that of the US.  If Trump and the subsequent Vance administration has bullied them for all that time, it only strengthens our hand in negotiating with them.  We offer them something that he didn't: an equitable partnership that respects their dignity.

#5 Re: Science, Technology, and Astronomy » Geothermal Storage of Renewable Thermal Energy » 2026-01-23 04:09:23

Underground geothermal storage works best for storage of relatively low grade heat, at temperatures low enough to avoid boiling groundwater and causing explosions.  The low thermal conductivity of groundrock (1-5W/m.K) means that boreholes need to be close together.  This increases upfront drilling cost.  But unlike normal geothermal energy extraction, this is not heat mining because the heat is being stored and replenished.  So the infrastructure does not face the same life limiting problems associated with hot dry rock geothermal.  With the latter, once heat has been drained from an area, you have to move your power station because it takes millenia for conduction and radioactive decay to heat the local rock up again.  If you are using the rock to store externally supplied energy, that limitation doesn't apply.

This kind of technology could have a number of applications.  In situations where an industry needs a year round supply of relatively low grade heat, ~100°C, solar thermal infrastructure can charge this in the summer and the store allows heat to be used constantly throughout the year.  That has a lot of potential applications.  This technology really excels if we are prepared to make the investment in piped heating systems, i.e district heating.  This is expensive to set up, but if done properly it will last for centuries.  It is necessary because geothermal energy storage requires that heat be stored in a centralised volume.  A piping system is therefore needed to distribute heat to dispersed consumers.  A potential application for this technology is in small modular reactors providing waste heat for district heating.  The reactors will operate 24/7/365.  But heat demand is concentrated in the winter.

Another application is in solar assisted steam cycles.  We build hybrid solar biomass/coal powerplants.  In places away from the equator, the sun provides all of the energy to raise high quality steam in the summer, but cannot do so for the other 75% of the year.  So we othersize the collector relative to the boilers.  Heat is stored in boreholes at temperatures between 100 and 200°C.  Outside of summer, stored heat is used to heat water between 100-200°C is a combined cycle boiler system.  Coal or biomass provide the rest of the heating needed to provide high quality steam 300 - 400°C.  Using the geothermal store, you get a power station that uses a combination of solar heat and fuel to provide baseload power.  It is valuable, because biomass is a limited resource and it reduces CO2 emissions.  We can use biomass as a fuel in the autumn and early winter and then switch to coal when biomass runs out in the spring and early summer.  By using stored heat and leveraging fuel in this way, we get a baseload power source with reduced CO2 emissions and obviate the need to transport and store huge amounts of biomass.

Downsides: Every time you move heat you need a thermal gradient.  The low thermal conductivity of the rock means that the heat source must be substantially hotter than the store.  You end using higher grade heat to store lower grade heat.  But maybe that is a hit you can afford to take.  The other obvioys downside is that this is capital intensive infrastructure, that requires longterm investment horizons.  Humanity needs to begin thinking in this way.  We need to think of our grandchildren when we make investments.

#6 Re: Not So Free Chat » Greenland » 2026-01-23 03:17:10

NATO and Donald Trump have reached an agreement.  The US can now place missiles on Greenland and mine the rare earth resources that it needs.  In the meantime, Greenland remains Danish territory, on paper at least.
https://youtu.be/y8hULV9zdY0

The video explains that this is exactly the deal Trump wanted in the first place.  A lot of people (myself included) underestimated Trump and assumed that he must be insane because we failed to understand how he negotiates what he wants.  In fairness, he published a book 'The Art of the Deal' some 40 years ago, explaining how he negotiates.  He starts with an outragious demand that no one would agree to.  This creates a storm of fear and anger on the other side. He then reaches what would appear to be a compromise, but is in reality exactly what he wanted in the first place.  Everyone breathes a sigh of relief, thinking they have achieved some kind of compromise and got something that they wanted.  In reality, they have been played.  He gets what he wanted.  The whole unhinged, petulant child routine is an act, because he needed the other side to believe that the invasion was a real possibility.

When you understand how he operates and look at the whole routine in heinsight, it is actually an act of genius.  This guy knows exactly how to play people.  If he had gone to the Danes in the first place and asked for the right to mine whatever he wanted and put missiles on Greenland, he would have got pushback.  Playing it the way he did, he ended up with everything he wanted in the first place.  We should have read his book.

The only downside is that he can only pull this trick so many times, before people cotton on.  Maybe the rights to Greenland were worth exposing the tell.  On that point, I do have some doubts.  Greenland has never been a very valuable territory for anyone.  There is a reason why none of the great powers ever seriously challenged Danish sovereignty over Greenland since the middle ages.  It is a horribly cold and windy environment and working conditions are probably harder than they would be on Mars.  The terrain that isn't covered in an ice cap, is mountainous and rugged, making inland transport almost impossible.  None of the fjords are really ice free, making it difficult to establish a port that can transport ores out.  Mining Greenland will be expensive.  The Chinese have tried it and largely failed.  Time will tell if US companies can make it work where the Chinese could not.

#7 Re: Science, Technology, and Astronomy » Asteroid/off-Earth mining » 2026-01-21 17:40:24

The rotational energy of asteroids can be converted into linear kinetic energy by extending a tether into space, far beyond the geostationary point.  The tip speed of the tether is proportional to its length.  Within the limits of tensile strength, a tether can be used to accelerate a payload to arbitrary speed.  If the tether extends far enough, it can be used to accelerate payloads to escape velocity, possibly resulting in velocity change of many km/s.  This is effectively free energy, as it derives directly from the rotational energy of the asteroid.

The kinetic energy stored in a rotating body is given by:

Ke = 0.5 x I x w^2

Where I is moment of inertia and w is angular velocity in radians per second.  Let us assume a roughly spherical asteroid.  The moment of inertia of a uniform density sphere is given by:

I = 2/5 x MR^2

Where M is the mass of the asteroid and R is its radius.  For a spherical body, mass is given by:

M = Rho x 4/3 x pi x R^3

Where rho is density.  Substituting into the moment of inertia equation:

I = rho x 8/15 x pi x R^5

Substituting I into the KE equation gives:

KE = 4/15 x rho x pi x R^5 x w^2.

In this example, we find an asteroid with a diameter of 710m and a rotation rate of once every 1.88 minutes.  That is an angular velocity of 0.0557 rad/s.
https://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/news … -2025-mn45

If we assume a stony iron composition and a density of 2600kg.m-3, we can use the rotational energy equation to estimate the amount of energy available to a tether system.

KE = 4/15 x rho x pi x R^5 x w^2

KE = 4/15 x 2600 x pi x 355^5 x 0.0557^2 = 3.81E13J (10.58GWh).

Suppose we were to use half of that energy to change the velocity of a mass by 2km/s.  How much mass could we accelerate?

M = 1.91E13 / (0.5 x 2000^2) = 9,526,103kg (~9500 metric tonnes).

This is only 0.002% of the total mass of the asteroid.  But it could potentially be valuable in the early years of asteroid mining, before advanced nuclear propulsion systems are available.  It could also be sufficient to make fast rotating asteroids into dangerous weapons.

#8 Re: Science, Technology, and Astronomy » Vera C Rubin Observatory » 2026-01-21 17:39:18

This telescope started operation in 2025.  It is expected to detect hundreds of thousands of new small bodies in the solar system.

One interesting recent discovery is a main belt asteroid some 710m in diameter, rotating once every 1.88 minutes.  That is a surface velocity of 19.8m/s.
https://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/news … -2025-mn45

It occurs to me that rapidly rotating bodies like this could provide free energy accelerating spacecraft onto different orbits.  They are also potential weapons in a future solar system.  Using this body in particular, a tether with a length of 101 asteroid radii (35.85km) would have a tip speed of 2km/s.  Such a tether could hurl projectiles onto trajectories that would collide with planets and space colonies.  This would be relatively cheap and technically easy to do.

Something like this was featured in the sci-fi series The Expanse.  The Belters hurled space rocks and lumps of iron onto a collision course with Earth.  They coated them with stealth tech composites to prevent them from being detected and taken out by nuclear tipped missiles and rail guns before impact.  Using rapidly rotating asteroids as slings, this sort of thing could actually happen in the centuries ahead.  In the nearer future, tapping asteroid rotation can be used to reduce the propulsive dV needed to bring ores mined on asteroids back to Earth orbit.


Edit SpaceNut: Copied your post before closing the other one.

#10 Re: Not So Free Chat » Greenland » 2026-01-18 15:22:35

Void, perhaps the Russians have read Sun Tzu's The Art of War.  Specifically, the part that says 'never interupt your enemy whilst he is making a mistake'.  If Trump annexes Greenland, I cannot see any other nation in the world wanting a US base on their soil in the future.  Overnight, US bases would stop looking like security guarentees and look more like stategic threats.  The arrogance of what Trump is doing is quite staggering.  Can you imagine a situation where a country like Britain, France or Russia, threatened to use troops to sieze Alaska, if the US did not hand it over to them peacefully?  What on Earth makes anyone here think America can play by different rules to everyone else?

What Trump is doing is nothing short of extortion.  It poses a grave risk to global security, because it is likely to weaken trust between the US and allied nations.  Without cooperation from those nations and their willingness to have you on their soil, a large part of US power projection capability disappears almost overnight.  No wonder the Russians are keeping quiet about this.  They undoubtably want it to happen.  I said before that I didn't think Trump was a Russian agent.  I'm not so sure now.  If a US president were a Russian agent and wanted to damage the relationship between the US and the rest of the world, he would be doing exactly what Trump is doing.

#11 Re: Not So Free Chat » Greenland » 2026-01-16 14:48:27

I don't think Trump is a Russian agent.  The Russian collusion hoax was a smear campaign invented by the Obama administration on behalf of Hillary Clinton.  It was a convenient lie that they literally pulled out of thin air.  People will happily believe whatever nonsense is thrown at them if it supports their ingrained political prejudices. People that don't like Trump because of his politics will talk whatever nonsense they think will make him look bad.  It is called 'throwing mud'.

What the events of the past several days have shown is that Trump is a poor statesman. He is neither a politician nor a diplomat.  And he has managed to convince all of Europe that the US is a potential enemy that they need to rally together to guard against.  The amount of damage he has inflicted on America's reputation and foreign policy is incalculable.  They now see the US as a threat to their security on a par with Russia.  All of this for Greenland, which the US already had access to anyway.  Trump didn't need to be a Russian asset to do this.  He just needed to be what he undeniably is.  A poorly educated and underqualified old man, trying to do a job that is beyond his capabilities.  The problem isn't so much a problem of his personal politics.  It is a problem of his personal competance.  And he has a weak yes man as vice president, who either doesn't understand the situation or is incapable of standing up to his boss and telling him hard truths.

#12 Re: Science, Technology, and Astronomy » Fusion power in the offing? » 2026-01-02 17:42:30

This is interesting.
https://evidencenetwork.ca/germany-is-m … ar-fusion/

The Germans have invested hundreds of millions of euros into inertial confinement fusion using femtosecond lasers.  ICF uses lasers to heat the surface of a frozen pellet of hydrogen isotopes.  As the surface heats up, x-ray pressure sends shockwaves through the interior of the pellet and the outer layers ablate off. The laser drivers used up to now, have delivered the energy to the pellet surface slowly.  The problem is that plasma ablated from the pellet tends to shield the surface from recieving additional laser light.  This makes laser drivers relatively inefficient.  Femtosecond lasers could substantially improve driver efficiency as energy is delivered to the surface before a plasma bubble can form around the pellet.

The National Ignition Facility, without the benefit of femtosecond lasers, made history in 2022, by generating 3.15MJ of fusion energy from 2MJ of laser energy.  The low efficiency of lasers means that this is nowhere near breakeven from a net energy perspective.  But if driver efficiency can be improved through use of femtosecond lasers, it should take this technology much closer to net energy breakeven.  If femtosecond lasers allow overall breakeven to be reached, then ICF will be efficient enough to provide a neutron source for breed and burn hybrid fusion fission reactors.  This would dramatically improve the sustainability of the fission fuel cycle, whilst avoiding the need for reprocessing.

#13 Re: Martian Politics and Economy » Money » 2025-12-24 04:37:47

Peter Zeihan pointed out that there is nowhere near sufficient gold in reserves to cover the value of trade that modern economies undertake.  This is a fair enough point.  Traditionally, the currencies were e changeable for gold and silver.  But even though they were theoretically exchangeable, very few people ever took a pound note to the Bank of England and demanded a pound of silver.  In the modern world, we could base the value of a currency on a basket of non-perishable commodities.  Instead of the promiss to pay 1 pound sterling, our banks would pay one pound sterling or its equivelent value in other non-perishables.  This could be gold, silver, copper, aluminium ingots, pig iron, gem stones, rare earths, ethanol, oil, etc.  Gold and silver are always better from the point of view of being value-dense and easy to ship for barter.  But 100te of pig iron still has the same value as 1kg of gold.  Others have suggested that currency could be valued in energy units.  This may make more sense, as wealth is very much a product of energy and energy use scales with GDP.

#14 Re: Exploration to Settlement Creation » Buried geodesic domes » 2025-12-23 17:07:17

Previously, we examined building a 200m wide catenary dome from Martian bricks as the site of a town hoysing 3000 - 10,000 people, depending upon the density of construction.  I wonder if a steel structure would be quicker and easier to produce?  Repeatable hexagonal units can be produced in large numbers.  These can be welded into a frame structure that is then covered in loose rocks and regolith.

#15 Re: Planetary transportation » Internal combustion engines for Mars » 2025-12-23 16:48:50

We will need fuels for a variety of different applications.  Rocket vehicles and long-range ground vehicles will need high energy density fuels like methane or ethanol.  But we also need vehicles that can do work close to the base, shifting soil, digging and transporting materials and equipment.  We also need CO as reducing agent for iron ore and in brick manufacture.  Burning CO with O2, also provides the high temperatures needed to turn carbonate into lime.  Important if we want concrete.  If CO is more energy efficient to produce than liquid methane, then I think it likely that we will be producing a great deal of it for a lot of applications.  We won't just be producing one type of fuel.

Before the development of North Sea natural gas, most commercial and industrial gas used in the UK, was town gas.  This was a mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide, with smaller amounts of methane, heavier hydrocarbons and contaminant gases like CO2 and N2.  This was stored in huge steel telescopic tanks at close to atmospheric pressure.  I wonder if something similar will be done on Mars.  CO and O2 could be stored in polymer bags under light pressure.  The bags would be protected from damage and will be provided with external pressurisation, by housing them in steel tanks which are then covered in Martian soil for pressure ballast.

#16 Re: Life support systems » Crops » 2025-12-23 16:25:28

Duckweed!
https://youtu.be/U_405zhZkbY

This is a small, floating family of plants that is regularly eaten in eastern countries but is considered to be pond scum in the west.  By my calculations, 1kg of wet yield contains 430 calories.  Average productivity is around 20kg/m2/year.  So an 84m2 pond would produce enough calories to feed 1 person indefinitely.  More interesting is that some species are about 40% protein by weight, making this 10x more productive than the equivelent area of soybeans.  What is more, duckweed contains all nine essential amino acids.  This means you can build muscle by eating duckweed without supplementing it with anything else.  It is also a vegetable source of vitamin B12 and omega-3 fatty acid.  Some varieties are high in starch, allowing dried and powdered duckweed to be blended with wheat flour to make bread.  This is more nutritious and healthy than standard bread.

These floating plants are about the size of sand grains.  We could pump floating duckweed through transparent pipes on the Martian surface.  Martian CO2 could be injected into the water and the plants would convert it into biomass.  The water can be warmed using nuclear waste heat.  This allows the wasteheat radiators of Martian nuclear reactors to serve as an abundant food source.  To feed a city of 1million people would need an area of some 84km2.  That is a square about 9km (5.5 miles) aside.  This is more compact than most cities with a population of 1million.  Presumably, water with dissolved acetate salts would grow duckweed without sunlight.  In this case, our food production could take place in a compact facility using nuclear power.  But as nuclear reactors need waste heat radiators anyway, why not use them to grow duckweed in sunlight and then use the electric power for other purposes?

Human waste can be recycled very efficiently in this arrangement.  Waste would first enter an añaerobic digester, producing methane as a fuel.  When fully digested, the waste breaks down into water with dissolved nutrients and an organic sludge which seperates by gravity.  The water can be pumped back into the duckweed farm.  The organic sludge would be added to martian regolith and used to make soil.  Nothing gets wasted in this arrangement.

Duckweed is a photosynthetic plant.  It is therefore a potential source of chloroplasts, which Robert has discussed as a means to produce oxygen and glucose in compact volumes.  The glucose can be added to foods to boost calorie content. It can also be fermented into alcohol.  This will have uses as a fuel, a low temperature working fluid, a screenwash for vehicles, solar panels and greenhouses and for human consumption.  Over time, we may find ways of using alcohol, yeasts and algae to make rum and whisky that we can export to Earth.  This was my original hacienda idea.

#17 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Propellant Sourced from Moon » 2025-12-20 16:45:28

Why I'm obssessed with the moon.
https://youtu.be/8le1kudhVNQ

Quite inspiring.  The moon is the key to building a spacefaring society.

#18 Re: Not So Free Chat » Peter Zeihan again: and also other thinkers: » 2025-12-20 15:55:14

The End of China's Rise and the Future of World Order.
https://youtu.be/IL6OHMr21f8

As Chinese economic power declines, it becoming increasingly aggressive.

#20 Re: Planetary transportation » Cable Transport » 2025-12-18 18:09:17

This video discusses rope drives.
https://youtu.be/C-WxGuZhCuk

One thing I find interesting is that a single pulley can drive several rope drives for different machines.

#21 Re: Home improvements » Misc. Home Projects » 2025-12-18 08:11:57

The machine is now fully operational.  I have built a tumbling machine that is connected to the clutch.  It is quite windy at present and the machine is working well.  I will check on the progress of the stones early next week.

#22 Re: Meta New Mars » kbd512 Postings » 2025-12-10 16:16:30

To make carbon monoxide, carbon must be burned in an atmosphere with limited oxygen.  This releases about 20% of the heat released by complete combustion.  The process that Kbd512 has described produces particles of carbon.  So that is what we start with.  Carbon monoxide has important uses of its own.  One such use is the production of reduced iron.  Making strong engineering bricks is another use we have noted.  But it is a precursor to other more convenient fuels.  For example:

CO + H2O + heat = CO2 + H2
2H2 + CO = CH3OH.

This is methanol.  It is a clean burning liquid fuel that doesn't freeze until -97°C.  We could store it in tanks on Mars with very little pressurisation.  By using the appropriate catalyst, methanol can form dimethyl ether:

2CH3OH = H20 + H3C-O-CH3.

Dimethyl ether has been considered as a diesel substitute.  It would make an energy dense rocket fuel that is less volatile than methane.

#23 Re: Home improvements » Misc. Home Projects » 2025-12-10 16:02:51

SpaceNut wrote:

This design can be built Horizontal or vertical in form https://www.instructables.com/55-Gallon-Drum-Turbine/

This is the kind of machine that I would choose to build if I could repeat the process.  A much simpler machine, easier to build, able to accept wind from any direction and although slightly less efficient, it has more starting torque than the horizontal axis machines.  That is important, because the rope drive and any machinery attached to the clutch, will have considerable internal friction.  So efficiency is about more than just aerodynamics.

Update: Today I attached the rope drive and the clutch.  It seems to be working as intended.  Aside from cosmetic changes and the balancing of the machine, it is now finished.

#24 Re: Exploration to Settlement Creation » Lighting use How and why things are not simple » 2025-12-10 15:48:46

SpaceNut, that is excellent research.  To produce actual Earth daylight effect sounds quite energy intensive, given that a sunny day in the northern hemisphere delivers a ground level solar flux of ~400W/m2.  For a 31,000m2 town, that implies 12.4MW of light, requiring ~5x that much power (60MW) in input electricity.  That is a lot of juice and a heavy burden on base power supply.  Averaged over 24 hours, that is 20MW of input power.  It is also a lot of heat that must be removed from the space.  It might be considered acceptable if it proves to have strong benefits for the mental health of residents.  I wonder how much we can compromise in terms of power consumption by eliminating frequencies that are beyond human eyesight?  Lighting for plants tends to be optimised for specific spectra that are most efficiently absorbed for photosynthesis.  How well will humans adapt if the daylight they experience is a different colour, i.e more shifted towards the red spectrum?

It occurs to me that daylight we experience here on Earth has considerable daily fluctuation.  Some days are overcast, others provide full sun and often the weather changes throughout the day.  Lighting in the habitat could be turned into a kind of dump load for excess power.

#25 Re: Home improvements » Misc. Home Projects » 2025-12-08 07:39:30

The rotor is turning now.
20251208-133208.jpg
There remains much to do.  The rotor must be balanced, the bearing caps must be installed and any damaged surfaces must be painted.  Finally, the rope drive must be installed.  This is going to take a while.  I would like to finish by next sunday.  I will see how it goes.

  1. Index
  2. » Search
  3. » Posts by Calliban

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB