New Mars Forums

Official discussion forum of The Mars Society and MarsNews.com

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Announcement: As a reader of NewMars forum, we have opportunities for you to assist with technical discussions in several initiatives underway. NewMars needs volunteers with appropriate education, skills, talent, motivation and generosity of spirit as a highly valued member. Write to newmarsmember * gmail.com to tell us about your ability's to help contribute to NewMars and become a registered member.

#1 2003-12-06 12:30:42

Rxke
Member
From: Belgium
Registered: 2003-11-03
Posts: 3,669

Re: The Rocket Company - designing low-cost Reusable Launch Vehic

Anyone reading this? (a new chapter added weekly)
The Rocket Company
On the excellent Hobbyspace.com website...

Ok, it *is* fiction, but quite informative, with loads of *real* references about past and future successes and failures of the attempts to build cheap, reusable launchers. Written by guys 'in the knowing,' so sometimes quite thought-provoking... About money mis-spent, mastodont organisations slowing progress, conflicting strategies that get fused in one big dead-on-the-drawing-boards monstruosities...

And a possible solution... (Suspense! Excitement! Cliffhangers!)

Offline

#2 2003-12-06 12:35:38

Rxke
Member
From: Belgium
Registered: 2003-11-03
Posts: 3,669

Re: The Rocket Company - designing low-cost Reusable Launch Vehic

Just one gem from the latest installment:

"...military services often canceled a development program just before it was ready to go into production, because the program was over budget, over schedule, and projecting unit costs way above design goals. So they canceled the tank, the helicopter, the airplane, or the ship and started again from scratch, this time seeking a less capable, but ostensibly lower cost system. After many more years of design and development, the new system was ready for production. Inevitably, that system ended up costing more - with less functionality and lower performance - than the system which had been canceled. In the meantime, enough money had been spent on research and development for the new system to pay for a sizable deployment of the old one!"

Sounds familiar? Next-generation Shuttle follow-up debacle anyone?

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB