Debug: Database connection successful
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Speculation of advanced food production. Speculated about starship food production for a TV show or sci-fi book.
In the "Large scale colonization ship" thread, I described life support for a large ship for Mars: 6 months to Mars. Using technologies that either exist or can be developed in the short term. Let's start with that...
Existing technology:
CO2 removed from cabin air with a regenerable sorbent. Amine paste painted on styrofoam peas, regenerated periodically via heat and partial vacuum. Alternative is silver oxide granules; more compact but more mass.
remove bad smells with activated carbon. That's charcoal turned into an open cell foam. Also regenerated with heat and partial vacuum.
urine filtered to remove remove water
some concentrated urine aged with bacteria to produce nitrate fertilizer with a little potassium and phosphate for hydroponics, the rest transferred to waste receptacle.
feces vacuum desiccated. Dry feces ground in a garburator, transported by auger and pressurized air to waste receptacle.
water processor: from filtered urine, desiccated feces, and wash water
recycling shower: cyclone separation, then filtration. Result: 70% of water that goes down the drain, comes back out the shower head. Reduces water consumption and energy to heat water. Water not recycled goes to water processor
aquaponics: combination of hydroponics and aquaculture. Grow fresh vegetables. Parts of plants that aren't edible (stems, leaves) fed to fish. Fish poop used as fertilizer. Fertilizer from urine used only for hydroponic crops with produce above ground, not root crops.
short-term technology:
chloroplast oxygen generator. Chloroplasts isolated from leaves of a plant stored in sterile water in a transparent plastic bag. Light on bag as energy source. Sunlight can be directed by mirror through a window, but UV must be filtered out to avoid damaging chloroplasts. Plastic is semi-permeable to let O2 out. To promote O2 getting out, circulate water inside bag with a pump, blow air across outside of bag with a fan.
chloroplasts will produce carbohydrate as byproduct. Peas are the easist to isolate chloroplasts. Peas produce pea starch. Filter starch from water of oxygen generator bags, dry starch for use in kitchens.
Emergency food: starch dissolved in water, add bread yeast and ferment for 3 days. Cook in microwave oven. Result is translucent white with consistency of pudding, flavour and aroma of freshly baked bread. Yeast adds a little protein, lipids, and full vitamin B complex (except B12).
break down starch with enzyme (amylase) to produce sugar
amylase produced by a species of mould grown in a vat on starch
New speculative technology:
cultured meat. This requires a lot of animal hormones.
grow animal hormones in vats with genetically modified bacteria. Bacteria fed sugar.
flour: mostly starch, so start with pea starch. Grow protein and lipids appropriate for bread flour with genetically modified yeast, grown in a vat. Bacteria fed sugar. Dry and grind yeast, mix with starch to produce flour.
bake bread from aforementioned flour: sandwich bread, buns for burgers, etc
hydroponically grown potatoes. Can we grow potatoes large enough for french fries? With potato plant roots in hydroponic solution, possibly stabilized with vermiculite. Potatoes grow a "stolon", which is a modified plant stem, not a root. A potato grows on the end of each stolon, one stolon per potato. Normally potatoes grow underground, but for hydroponics is it possible for machinery to move the end of each stolon to some sort of cage, separate from roots? Perhaps more vermiculite to support the potato? The goal is to remove the vegetable from hydroponic solution, and separate the vegetable so it can be easily harvested without killing the plant. Potato is perennial: the plant dies with winter cold, but re-grows in spring from the tuber (the potato). How long can we keep a plant alive and producing before starting over?
Potato details: As long as temperature is warm, the plant has plenty of water and nutrients and light, the plant will continue to grow. And continue to produce potatoes. Potato plants produce fruit, about the size of cherry tomatoes. The fruit contains about 300 seeds each. Seeds do grow, but plants are not consistent. Plants grown from potato sections are a clone of the parent. Seeds are where new varieties come from. Potato fruit is poisonous, as are stems and leaves, only the tuber is edible. Potato is part of the Nightshade family. But potato flowers require pollination to produce fruit, so an enclosed hydroponic operation can keep pollinators out.
I still argue for soil agriculture for greenhouses on Mars. Hydroponics requires nutrient solution. Why create industry to extract nutrients from Mars dirt? More efficient to treat Mars dirt to produce arable soil.
Menu: salad
romaine lettuce
raw spinach
tomatoes: cherry and regular
sliced bell peppers (green & red)
sliced cucumber
grated carrots
snap peas (stringless)
green beans
strawberry
green onion
bean sprouts
broccoli
Croutons can be made from bread baked on the ship.
Mushrooms can be grown in compost: white (aka button), portobellow, cremini/crimini, oyster mushrooms
Could we produce vegetable oil with vat-grown bacteria instead of plants? For cooking oil and salad dressing?
Microbial vat-grown casein for cheese?
Ketchup
entrée:
burger
dinner roll
chicken sandwich: ground/pressed chicken patty, chicken salad
Salisbury steak: just a burger patty without the bun, usually served with gravy and mushrooms
french fries (aka chips)
potato chips (aka crisps)
mashed potatoes
meatloaf
tilapia fish steak
sashimi: tilapia only. Not sushi. Sushi has rice, maki is layers of fish and rice wrapped in seaweed. I'm suggesting no rice or seaweed.
pancake / waffle
A starship would have some stored food, but producing the bulk along the way greatly reduces the amount of stored food.
Offline
Like button can go here
Food has been produced on the ISS, I believe Shuttle lab and the Russian Mir also studied plant growth the only other place I know that food was produced was the Chinese mission on the Moon, they might have grown stuff on a Chinese station but I never read of it. Seeds were seen close-up growing and sprouting under a Lunar protective cover inside the Chinese Moon-Rover but I believe they later died under the intense temperature changes on the Lunar surface. The Mars farm might be much easier, it has a solar day lasts 24 hours, 39 minutes, an atmosphere to regulate temperatures better. Plants may be used for more than just foods, to remove poisonous carbon dioxide from the air, while creating life-giving oxygen in return
Last edited by Mars_B4_Moon (2021-05-15 17:15:02)
Offline
Like button can go here
Salads are bland without a dressing to add flavor
vinegar
olives
soybean
Offline
Like button can go here
My big idea here is to use pea starch for flour. Flour is 70-75% starch, 10-12% protein, 2-3% polysaccharides, 2% lipids. (reference) So develop a yeast to grow the other parts. This produces flour without a wheat field.
Vinegar is made by growing the vinegar bacillus in sugar water. Be careful not to mix that with other culture vats, because vinegar tends to like the same food and growing conditions as yeast. White vinegar is distilled. Wine vinegar is grape juice that is "fermented" with the vinegar bacillus instead of yeast. Yeast turns grape juice into wine (makes alcohol).
And this: Technology Startup Creates Lab-Grown Palm Oil
Green startup C16 Biosciences has developed a lab-grown alternative to palm oil.
...
C16 was able to create a sustainable, environmentally-friendly alternative to palm oil using yeast, that grows in tap water, and feeding it a feedstock or carbon source to multiply.
...
“Fermentation is a well-proven commercial process that has been used for centuries to convert raw materials into consumable commercial products consumed by billions of people every day,” C16’s website says. “We believe that brewing palm oil like beer is the best and most likely path to developing a truly sustainable palm oil alternative.”
Now can we do that with vegetable oil?
Offline
Like button can go here
For RobertDyck re new topic !!! Great Start! Best wishes for the topic!
Would someone be willing to contact C16 Biosciences to ask the question posted in Post #3?
(th)
Offline
Like button can go here
Lots of good ideas there!
I think it's quite likely that Mars will never see a domesticated animal reared for meat. Maybe animals like deer that live wild will be permitted for meat consumption as part of approved culls. But domesticated animals reared solely for human consumption...I think not.
As well as cultured meat, there is the "Impossible Burger" option of producing food that is as near as dammit to meat, as you cover every taste, texture and nutrient option with vegetarian components (there are plants for example that have contents very similar to mammal blood).
Speculation of advanced food production. Speculated about starship food production for a TV show or sci-fi book.
In the "Large scale colonization ship" thread, I described life support for a large ship for Mars: 6 months to Mars. Using technologies that either exist or can be developed in the short term. Let's start with that...
Existing technology:
CO2 removed from cabin air with a regenerable sorbent. Amine paste painted on styrofoam peas, regenerated periodically via heat and partial vacuum. Alternative is silver oxide granules; more compact but more mass.
remove bad smells with activated carbon. That's charcoal turned into an open cell foam. Also regenerated with heat and partial vacuum.
urine filtered to remove remove water
some concentrated urine aged with bacteria to produce nitrate fertilizer with a little potassium and phosphate for hydroponics, the rest transferred to waste receptacle.
feces vacuum desiccated. Dry feces ground in a garburator, transported by auger and pressurized air to waste receptacle.
water processor: from filtered urine, desiccated feces, and wash water
recycling shower: cyclone separation, then filtration. Result: 70% of water that goes down the drain, comes back out the shower head. Reduces water consumption and energy to heat water. Water not recycled goes to water processor
aquaponics: combination of hydroponics and aquaculture. Grow fresh vegetables. Parts of plants that aren't edible (stems, leaves) fed to fish. Fish poop used as fertilizer. Fertilizer from urine used only for hydroponic crops with produce above ground, not root crops.
short-term technology:
chloroplast oxygen generator. Chloroplasts isolated from leaves of a plant stored in sterile water in a transparent plastic bag. Light on bag as energy source. Sunlight can be directed by mirror through a window, but UV must be filtered out to avoid damaging chloroplasts. Plastic is semi-permeable to let O2 out. To promote O2 getting out, circulate water inside bag with a pump, blow air across outside of bag with a fan.
chloroplasts will produce carbohydrate as byproduct. Peas are the easist to isolate chloroplasts. Peas produce pea starch. Filter starch from water of oxygen generator bags, dry starch for use in kitchens.
Emergency food: starch dissolved in water, add bread yeast and ferment for 3 days. Cook in microwave oven. Result is translucent white with consistency of pudding, flavour and aroma of freshly baked bread. Yeast adds a little protein, lipids, and full vitamin B complex (except B12).
break down starch with enzyme (amylase) to produce sugar
amylase produced by a species of mould grown in a vat on starch
New speculative technology:
cultured meat. This requires a lot of animal hormones.
grow animal hormones in vats with genetically modified bacteria. Bacteria fed sugar.
flour: mostly starch, so start with pea starch. Grow protein and lipids appropriate for bread flour with genetically modified yeast, grown in a vat. Bacteria fed sugar. Dry and grind yeast, mix with starch to produce flour.
bake bread from aforementioned flour: sandwich bread, buns for burgers, etc
hydroponically grown potatoes. Can we grow potatoes large enough for french fries? With potato plant roots in hydroponic solution, possibly stabilized with vermiculite. Potatoes grow a "stolon", which is a modified plant stem, not a root. A potato grow on the end of each stolon, one stolon per potato. Normally potatoes grow underground, but for hydroponics is it possible for machinery to move the end of each stolon to some sort of cage, separate from roots? Perhaps more vermiculite to support the potato? The goal is to remove the vegetable from hydroponic solution, and separate the vegetable so it can be easily harvested without killing the plant. Potato is perennial: the plant dies with winter cold, but re-grows in spring from the tuber (the potato). How long can we keep a plant alive and producing before starting over?
Potato details: As long as temperature is warm, the plant has plenty of water and nutrients and light, the plant will continue to grow. And continue to produce potatoes. Potato plants produce fruit, about the size of cherry tomatoes. The fruit contains about 300 seeds each. Seeds do grow, but plants are not consistent. Plants grown from potato sections are a clone of the parent. Seeds are where new varieties come from. Potato fruit is poisonous, as are stems and leaves, only the tuber is edible. Potato is part of the Nightshade family. But potato flowers require pollination to produce fruit, so an enclosed hydroponic operation can keep pollinators out.
I still argue for soil agriculture for greenhouses on Mars. Hydroponics requires nutrient solution. Why create industry to extract nutrients from Mars dirt? More efficient to treat Mars dirt to produce arable soil.
Menu: salad
romaine lettuce
raw spinach
tomatoes: cherry and regular
sliced bell peppers (green & red)
sliced cucumber
grated carrots
snap peas (stringless)
green beans
strawberry
green onion
bean sprouts
broccoli
Croutons can be made from bread baked on the ship from flour brought from Mars.
Mushrooms can be grown in compost: white (aka button), portobellow, cremini/crimini, oyster mushrooms
Could we produce vegetable oil with vat-grown bacteria instead of plants? For cooking oil and salad dressing?
Microbial vat-grown casein for cheese?Ketchup
entrée:
burger
dinner roll
chicken sandwich: ground/pressed chicken patty, chicken salad
Salisbury steak: just a burger patty without the bun, usually served with gravy and mushrooms
french fries (aka chips)
potato chips (aka crisps)
mashed potatoes
meatloaf
tilapia fish steak
sashimi: tilapia only. Not sushi. Sushi has rice, maki is layers of fish and rice wrapped in seaweed. I'm suggesting no rice or seaweed.
pancake / waffle
A starship would have some stored food, but producing the bulk along the way greatly reduces the amount of stored food.
Let's Go to Mars...Google on: Fast Track to Mars blogspot.com
Offline
Like button can go here
Lots of good ideas there!
I think it's quite likely that Mars will never see a domesticated animal reared for meat. Maybe animals like deer that live wild will be permitted for meat consumption as part of approved culls. But domesticated animals reared solely for human consumption...I think not.
As well as cultured meat, there is the "Impossible Burger" option of producing food that is as near as dammit to meat, as you cover every taste, texture and nutrient option with vegetarian components (there are plants for example that have contents very similar to mammal blood).
Yea, I agree. I expect Mars will be vegan. Not for any philosophical reason, just because it's practical. For example, pigs eat the same food we do, just less processed. It takes several pounds of animal feed to produce one pound of meat. Yes, meat has greater concentration of energy, but number of calories of food energy per unit area of greenhouse is greatest when you eat vegan. I expect veggie substitutes for meat. "Impossible Burger" is greatly improved vs previous versions. I kept the wrapper of a package I bought a few years ago, specifically so I could read the list of ingredients: "Yves original veggie ground round. Gives an an idea what's involved. By Canadian regulations, food products must list ingredients by relative quantity, so the first ingredients is the one for which there's the most. Of course they can make ingredients obscure; for example "glucose-fructose" is another way of saying "sucrose" which is normal white sugar. And General Foods International Coffee is a flavoured instant coffee powder; I noticed it includes silicon dioxide; that's sand. And cyanocobalamin is a form of vitamin B12.
Water, soy protein product, onions, natural flavours, canola oil, salt, guar gum, evaporated cane syrup, malt extract, caramel (colour), spices, yeast extract, vitamins and minerals (thiamine hydrochloride, riboflavin, niacinamide, pyridoxine hydrochloride, cyanocobalamin, calcium pantothenate, ferrous fumarate, zinc oxide), wheat starch.
A couple anecdotes. The local chapter of the Mars Society includes a couple vegan members. Well, we haven't met since COVID, but you get the idea. I mentioned that Mars will be vegan for a long time, at least until Mars has sufficient population and industry to afford the extreme expense of keeping livestock on a planet without a breathable atmosphere. The vegan members wanted Mars to stay vegan, believe that once people get used to it, they will want to stay vegan. But when I mentioned this to a few Mars Society members who aren't vegan, they got upset! They said they refuse to go to Mars unless they can have their meat. Ok, so I did some research how to transport livestock to Mars. It isn't easy; you don't want to be in a spacecraft with a cow freaking out over zero-G. That calmed the down the carnivores. Then PETA sent the cabbage girls (lettuce ladies) to meet Elon Musk at one of his press conferences. He wasn't prepared, his response was that he isn't the overlord of Mars. Once again I would like to apologize to Elon. I'm the one who stirred up the vegans.
However, I started this discussion when I was thinking about a science fiction starship. The original Enterprise from Star Trek TOS (1966-1969) did not have replicators. It did have food processing machinery. So what exactly is that machinery? So I started with life support that I came up with for the "Large scale colonization ship", then added "New speculative technology". You can grow a wheat field or barley field in a greenhouse on Mars, but a ship isn't big enough. Mars greenhouses can even grow an orchard of coffee trees, or sugar cane for molasses and brown sugar, vanilla vines for vanilla bean, pepper vines for black pepper, bay laurel trees for bay leaf, cinnamomum verum trees for cinnamon, etc. Grape vines can be grown for table grapes, wine, or processed for tartaric acid, an ingredient for baking powder. But a ship has limited space.
Offline
Like button can go here
Hmm. This could be profitable industry here on Earth. Bags of chloroplasts that convert water and CO2 into O2 and starch. Even if you don't use the O2, that's practically free starch. If the peas can be genetically engineered so invitro chloroplasts remain viable for 6 months, that becomes profitable. Energy source is sunlight. Don't use artificial light, just sunlight. So the industrial facility will produce very little starch during a cloudy or rainy day, so what. Sunlight is free. Then feed some of the starch to a vat to grow mould for amylase. Then use amylase to break starch into sugar. This produces white sugar without any fields. Well... fields of plastic bags full of sterile water with chloroplasts. And a greenhouse can grow peas to 14 days from germination, so they can harvest leaves to produce the chloroplasts. Then grow vats of special yeast for the protein etc for flour. That means the facility could sell flour without any wheat field.
Individuals with celiac disease cannot eat gluten. Flour made with pea starch instead of wheat starch? Could you replace gluten with another protein that is safe for those who require a gluten-free diet? Yet the protein can hold together bread or pasta? Flour for gluten free bread and pasta would sell.
Offline
Like button can go here
For RobertDyck .... you seem to be on a roll here ....
Is there something forum members could do to help turn the idea of #8 into a going enterprise?
Contacts they might know? Letters they might write? Investors who might be willing to gamble a megabuck or two? Existing companies interested in new products?
(th)
Offline
Like button can go here
The tricky thing is how do we do that without someone just stealing my ideas? It has happened before. I posted my idea of an experiment for carbon nanofibres. Chemists had devised not just one, but a couple catalysts to grow carbon nanofibres. The probably is they could only grow 1/10th of a millimetre long. One researcher claimed he achieved 3/10th of millimetre, but no one has been able to verify that. Even if he did, that's still not useful. I suggested a way to extrude a continuous ribbon. One researcher tried my experiment, exactly as I described, right down to brand name of the supplies. It worked. They can now produce continuous ribbons of carbon nanofibre. Or if you twist while pulling, a thread. Threads can be braided to form rope. Or ribbons can be woven to form sheets. He got all the credit.
The trick is finding investors who are actually willing to invest. Not just steal my ideas.
Offline
Like button can go here
For RobertDyck re #10
Thanks for the great news that an idea you came up with is practical and useful in real life!
After many years I have ** finally ** arrived at what I hope is a better understanding of how intellectual property works (or doesn't) (or ** could ** ) work.
The focus here is building a viable business using the ideas you have suggested.
The first hurdle/question is whether the idea is already covered by an IP claim. Unfortunately (from my experience) is is likely to be expensive to find out.
However, you can publish your idea (as you have done) and then report your publication of the idea to the Patent Office (in your case in Canada).
The idea is to block anyone from claiming the IP (at least in Canada).
Next step is to start to build a case for funding, secure in the knowledge that you are the domain expert, and any funder would have to pay more for someone else to develop your idea into a business than would be the case if they just paid you in the first place.
There is an EXACT model of that concept at work right now in the forum. Marc has developed (and is still finishing) a concept for a minicomputer that can be made from robust lower grade silicon chips. His business model is to offer to serve as the domain expert for any entity willing to invest in building up the concept for use in commercial products. These would be remarkably robust and suitable for use in space (for example).
My point is that if you publish the work, and then PROTECT the publication as free and open, then you are freed up to concentrate on becoming the best manager of the process anyone could hire, so they would tend to hire you for that role.
***
Back to the nanofibers .... I see a crucial difference .... at the time you published the idea for making longer fibers, I'm guessing of course, but I ** think ** you did not have the resources to develop the idea to the point of demonstration.
It would have been "nice" if the chemist who achieved the demonstration had shared the fruits of labor with you (if his work was based upon your idea).
However, there is a very significant (definitely non-Zero) chance the chemist did not read your post, and simple came up with the working formula because that is the only formula that the Universe will allow.
I recommend you investigate to see if the chemist was aware of your post.
If (as it suspect) the ideas were spontaneously created independently, then you would potentially be in position to ask if you might be able to license the IP needed to actually make the fibers.
In ** that ** conversation, you might learn that the chemist is wanting to build his business, and might be willing to consider (negotiated) partnership of some kind.
In any case, congratulations (again) for thinking of a solution to the short-nano-fiber problem!
***
Question for you !!! Can the fiber you have in mind be made into a loop? I ask because (for a number of years now) I've been hoping to find a way to make loops of nanofiber so they can be fashioned into a rope. I even made a psuedo-rope of loops of plastic ring snaps to show how the concept would work.
The strength of a length of nanofiber can be propagated over a long distance the way the strength of steel chain loops is propagated over great lengths.
(th)
Offline
Like button can go here
There are companies working on some of this now.
Lab-grown food will soon destroy farming – and save the planet
The company mentioned in this article wants to do something similar. But they aren't interested in space. Their "hydrogen pathway" that they claim is more efficient than photosynthesis, will not generate oxygen. I started with an oxygen generator for life support on a space station. But... there could be some common ground. Again the worry is they'll think it's all theirs, steel my ideas and cut me out.
Offline
Like button can go here
My idea for the fibres was actually fairly simple. I don't know enough chemistry to devise a catalyst to make them. My hypothesis was gravity pushed the fibres down into the catalyst, when enough weight pressed on the catalyst, the reaction would stop. Chemists at the time fabricated a square with catalyst at multiple points. One fibre would grow from each catalyst on the square. The result was a "forest" (their word) of carbon nanofibres.
This reminded me of a demonstration of making nylon. A clear glass cylinder was filled with one clear colourless liquid, then a second liquid on top. Where the two liquids touched, they reacted to form a film of nylon. The demonstrator used a metal hook to reach in and hook the centre of the film, then pull it up. Because he pulled through the upper liquid, the film collapsed to a narrow tube. But as he pulled, as soon as the film separated from the glass cylinder wall, the two liquids met again. They reacted forming more film. So the demonstrator could pull and pull, the film would never end until all the liquid was gone.
Ok, so my idea was grab the carbon nanofibres with the glue end of a Post-it note. Use the Post-it note to pull the fibres from the catalyst bed. My hypothesis is as soon as the fibre separated, more fibre would form on the exposed catalyst. As long as raw material was provided to the catalyst bed, this should result in a continuous extrusion. Automated machinery would pull the fibres, winding them on some sort of spindle. The reason for a Post-it note is the glue is strong enough to hold, but weak enough that it can be pealed off without damaging the fibres.
The researcher did use a Post-it note. He used a steel wheel to wind the ribbon. Pulling at an angle so the individual fibres would touch and combine to form a ribbon. It worked. When he analyzed the result, he found the ribbon was composed of individual fibrils of only 1/10th mm each. I wasn't expecting that; I hoped for long fibres. Shorter fibrils meant the ribbon did not have all the strength that theoretical chemists had hoped for, but it was still stronger than steel. Stronger than graphite fibre.
The researcher went on to try more things. If he twists while pulling, instead of a ribbon, it forms a thread. Thread can be braided to form a rope. That's a detail I hadn't considered. He also found the fibrils were held together with Van der Waals force. I hadn't thought of that, I just hoped to form continuous fibres, and hoped they would somehow stick together.
You're right, I didn't have the resources to try it myself. But still notice the Post-it note. That's too specific to be a coincidence. Yes, the researcher had a Ph.D. and funding for his lab specifically for carbon nanofibre research. He went on beyond my little idea, but it was my idea that got past their obstacle.
Offline
Like button can go here
Salt and baking soda:
There is a process to make baking soda that isn't normally used. It's not economic on Earth. But a ship won't have access to limestone or other consumables.
CO2 + NaOH → NaHCO3
Electrolysis of salt: start with brine (highly concentrated salt water). Electrolysis across a membrane. Supply brine to anode side of membrane, sodium hydroxide (NaOH) will form on cathode side. Chlorine gas will bubble off anode. Hydrogen gas will bubble off cathode. Sodium hydroxide is known as lye or caustic soda; very strong alkali. Draw NaOH to another reaction bottle, then bubble CO2 gas through. Add enough CO2 gas to completely consume all NaOH. Then vacuum desiccate to dry baking soda solution to a powder.
HCl:
Bubble Cl2 gas and H2 gas under pressure through clean, pure water. The gasses will dissolve forming hydrochloric acid.
Salt from urine:
Urine concentrate will have most moisture removed. Chemical composition of urine
Urine is an aqueous solution of greater than 95% water, with a minimum of these remaining constituents, in order of decreasing concentration:
Urea 9.3 g/L
Chloride 1.87 g/L
Sodium 1.17 g/L
Potassium 0.750 g/L
Creatinine 0.670 g/L
Other dissolved ions, inorganic and organic compounds (proteins, hormones, metabolites)
I found a post on another forum that mentioned the above. It also stated...
Urine color is generally a result of the degradation of the heme molecule from blood into the urinary products, called bilirubin, urobilinogen, urochrome, urobilin and uroerythrin. In essence, they are all tetrapyrroles amounting to something on the order of 1mg per 100ml (or roughly 0.001% of urine)... so this is a very minor part of urine. Also, it should be noted that over 3,000 chemicals have been found in urine, so there's something to consider.
I thought of adding hydrogen chloride (hydrochloric acid) to this urine concentrate to cause salt to precipitate. If salt is at saturation, adding another chlorine salt will cause other chlorine salts to precipitate out. This would result in both NaCl (table salt) and KCl (salt substitute) to precipitate. The problem is quantities. Only enough would precipitate to to produce baking soda. Because baking soda would consume all NaOH, and HCl is a byproduct of NaOH. If you want pure food grade salt for cooking, we'll need another process.
Offline
Like button can go here
In the Crops discussion thread, I estimated greenhouse area required for each food crop. Calculated for 12 crew. As mentioned, this thread could be speculation for some science fiction story. Or could be used for the Large scale colonization ship. The latter was designed for 1,000 passengers, but could carry a maximum of 1,600 passengers if crowded into maximum number of passengers per cabin. So multiply greenhouse area by 100 (1,200 passengers and crew instead of 12). Potatoes were estimated as 145 m² for 12 people, so 14,500 m². That's way too big for the ship. So scale back: carry potatoes in food storage. That could be some fresh potatoes in refrigeration, but also frozen french fries, powdered mashed potatoes, and dried scalloped potatoes. Dehydrated means lower mass.
Food tissue culture? Just no. Stored meat (frozen, canned) and stored entrées.
Offline
Like button can go here
I wonder. The image above is a salt electrolysis cell. It uses a semipermeable membrane. Is there a membrane that will allow both sodium and potassium ions to pass, but not organics such as urea, creatinine, bilirubin, or other tetrapyrroles. So concentrated urine that still has just enough water so salt concentration is ideal for the electrolysis cell. A mixture of sodium hydroxide and potassium hydroxide forms on the other; call that lye. Chlorine gas and hydrogen gas bubbled under pressure through clean water to form hydrochloric acid. Lye is reacted with hydrochloric acid, neutralizing pH. Result is salt water; pure salt water. They dry to form salt. In fact you could bubble the gasses directly through the lye solution, no need to form acid separately.
Is there a semipermeable membrane that will pass sodium and not potassium? Or vice versa? So we could produce normal sodium chloride salt, and potassium chloride (salt substitute) separately?
Offline
Like button can go here
Soap
Soap is formed by reacting lye with oil. It can be done with animal fat, but the fat has to be heated to melt it. It can be done with vegetable oil. In post #4 I mentioned a company producing a replacement for palm oil with vat grown microbes. Other microbes produce other oils. Some yeast produce oil. This can be used to make cooking oil. But oil can be reacted with sodium hydroxide or potassium hydroxide to form soap. Sodium hydroxide produces firm or hard soap, potassium hydroxide produces softer soap such as liquid soap. Whether the oil is firm or liquid also affects the soap. Palm oil (or equivalent) with NaOH will produce bar soap, cooking oil (or equivalent) with KOH will produce liquid soap.
liquid soap for washing hands
shampoo
laundry soap
dish soap / dishwasher soap
How Is Shampoo Different Than Soap?
Shampoos also need to be delicate, able to cleanse without degreasing, easy to rinse out, and formulated to minimize eye irritation. Most shampoos have a pH level between four and six, which is close to the natural pH level of hair.
Even if you're tempted to use shampoo on your skin instead of body wash, you'll find that it often leaves your skin feeling slimy. Soap or liquid body wash is formulated with stronger detergents for your skin, which can often contain more oil and dirt than your hair usually does.
The water processor will produce a waste stream of body oil, hair oil, soap / shampoo, dirt, etc. This isn't urine, it isn't feces, but it isn't grey water either. This liquid waste can be broken down to form fertilizer for hydroponics.
Offline
Like button can go here
Yeast nutrient
With so many processes that use vat grown yeast, we'll need yeast nutrient. For home wine making, yeast nutrient is diammonium phosphate. That's two molecules of ammonia bonded to one molecule of phosphate. Yeast requires nitrogen for protein, phosphate for DNA and metabolism (ADP/ATP). It's a salt so can be easily made by reacting ammonia with phosphoric acid. So we need to extract ammonia and phosphate from human urine. This must be food grade pure, because it will be used to make vodka, gin, and various vat-grown products.
Offline
Like button can go here
Engineers Develop a New Water Treatment Technology That Could Also Help Mars Explorers
https://scitechdaily.com/engineers-deve … explorers/
The Chinese Lunar Rover had a bio Dome inside, its Moon mission sees plants and seeds sprout on the Moon, they would later die from the Moon's extreme temperatures.
China outlines space plans to 2025
https://spacenews.com/china-outlines-sp … s-to-2025/
Growing Vegetables in Antarctica in the EDEN ISS Project
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewsr.html?pid=54922
Offline
Like button can go here
For RobertDyck,
The article at the link below is about a book about soil. I am hoping this post is a good fit in the debate you have set up here:
***
The article at the link below is about the value of soil for growing food. It includes the assertion that growing food in rich soil provides more nutrients than growing food in non-soil environments, but I suspect that may be more a reflection of deficiency in the practice than a fundamental deficiency in the method.
Never-the-less, I get the impression by a soil enthusiast would be worth considering by anyone serious about living off Earth.
It appears to be written for those who live or may live on Earth, but the principles should be transferable to other planets and locations.
If a member of NewMars decides to read this book, please post a synopsis.
https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/solutio … 29732.html
The solution to climate change? It could be right under your feet
Jamie Blackett
Sat, November 20, 2021 1:25 PMPulling a carrot from the earth - Alamy
This is a very timely book. Farmers are pondering regenerative agriculture, gardeners are discussing “no dig” and we are all worried about reaching carbon “net zero”. But few of us know what we are talking about, largely because the scientific community has spent more time studying the stars than the soil on which our survival depends. As Matthew Evans observes: “For me, soil seemed dull and insipid.” Yet, “Good soil isn’t just an abstract concept; it’s a thing of wonder … There are more living things in a teaspoon of healthy soil than there are humans on Earth.”Most importantly, Evans explains how regenerative agriculture that draws carbon out of the atmosphere into the soil so that it is “like chocolate cake’” (through minimising soil disturbance and exposure, diverse cropping and grazing livestock) is our best hope of reversing climate change. He quotes Stéphane Le Foll’s “quatre pour mille” idea: that if all the world’s soils under human management were to increase in soil carbon by just four parts per 1,000 (0.4 per cent) annually, virtually the entire global increase in carbon emissions for each year could be offset. Suggestion for Mr and Mrs Thunberg: please pop a copy of Soil into Greta’s stocking this Christmas.
Soil is published by Murdoch Books at £14.99. To order your copy for £12.99 call 0844 871 1514 or visit the Telegraph Bookshop
(th)
Offline
Like button can go here
Rice growing well onboard CSS, reaching 30cm tall
Offline
Like button can go here
Precision harvesting market to grow to USD 22.4 billion by 2027
Offline
Like button can go here
World’s Biggest Vertical Farm Campus Slated for Richmond, Va
https://www.foodprocessing.com/industry … chmond-va/
quotes from older food production thread
To have a potential 40% gain on your investment is nothing to be dismissed.
It could be the margin of gain needed for success of the human race, rather than a decline per Easter Islands fall.
Very good news.
member has given us a great reason to grow specific foods:
Steve Stewart wrote:Mars could have several organic acids available by simply growing fruits and vegetables. Some of these organic acids include:
Citric acid (C6H8O7) is found in citrus fruits such as lemons, limes, oranges, tangerines, and tomatoes.
Acetic acid (C2H4O2) is found in apples, grapes, oranges, pineapples, and strawberries.
Formic acid (CH2O2) is found in apples, strawberries, and raspberries.
Oxalic acid (C2H2O4) is found in beet greens, rhubarb, spinach, beets, Swiss chard, endive, cocoa powder, kale, sweet potatoes, peanuts, and turnip greens.
Uric acid (C5H4N4O3) is found in spinach, peas, lenticels, cauliflowers, and beans.
Malic acid (C4H6O5) is found in apricots, blackberries, blueberries, cherries, grapes, peaches, pears, plums, watermelon, and mango.Another type of solvent that could be used is vinegar.
I would think that these do not need to be fresh for the intended use as cleaners and for nutritional aspects of vitimans
The latest theory that I read on the plight of the Easter Islanders says that it was due to Polynesian Rats, which arrived with the settlers and ate the seeds of the palm trees which dominated the Island. So as the palms were cut for structures the forest never got a chance to regrow, resulting in severe soil erosion and impoverished agriculture. Without the trees the people were unable to make large boats and were stuck on their island.
We must be careful not to take rats or their equivalent to Mars!
Studies by NASA indicate a greenhouse sufficient to produce enough food to feed astronauts will produce 3 times as much oxygen as required. On Mars there's a simple solution: bring in more CO2 from planetary atmosphere. However, this could be an issue for the Moon. So I don't think we should focus on "which plants supply the most oxygen", instead focus on which plants supply nutrition.
Offline
Like button can go here
You have to be very careful with how you apply new technology. A lot of people don't look at the big picture. Many vertical farms use artificial light. If this is constructed in a state where coal is burned to generate electricity, then vertical farming is not green at all. If solar panels are used to generate electricity, how much area of solar panels do you need to power a vertical farm? Compare that to using natural light for a greenhouse? For the Large Ship I did propose a vertical farm for salad, but that would use mirrors to illuminate crops with natural light. Using solar panels to convert light to electricity, then LED lights to convert back to light, is just wasteful. How large must the mines be to harvest minerals needed to fabricate solar panels and LED lights? In space we have unique conditions, because sunlight shines 24/7, never any night and never any clouds. Distributing that over a vertical farm is quite efficient. But farming with natural light on Earth is more efficient using traditional greenhouse.
On Mars I have argued for ambient light greenhouses as a backup for life support. There are several different technologies to generate oxygen and water on Mars. An efficient and safe system will use all of them, with ability to mix-and-match components should something fail. But all technologies have a single point of failure: power. If power fails, life support fails. On a planet with no breathable atmosphere, that's not safe. There's only one technology to generate oxygen without power: plants in a greenhouse. If greenhouses on Mars use artificial light, then that same single point of failure is applied to greenhouses too. When (not if) power fails, you won't be able to breathe for long. With ambient light greenhouses, plants will continue to grow and continue to generate oxygen even with complete power failure. Plants also transpire water through their leaves, generating humidity. Cold windows will condense that water, dripping to a collection trough at the bottom of each window. Plants can be watered with grey water, but humidity they transpire is cleaner than the best filtration system NASA has ever devised. Water collected this way will be safe to drink, and taste good. So greenhouses can provide both oxygen and water during complete power failure.
Offline
Like button can go here
This seems like a very good post Robert.
End
Online
Like button can go here
Pages: 1