New Mars Forums

Official discussion forum of The Mars Society and MarsNews.com

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Announcement: As a reader of NewMars forum, we have opportunities for you to assist with technical discussions in several initiatives underway. NewMars needs volunteers with appropriate education, skills, talent, motivation and generosity of spirit as a highly valued member. Write to newmarsmember * gmail.com to tell us about your ability's to help contribute to NewMars and become a registered member.

#26 2022-06-16 17:54:38

SpaceNut
Administrator
From: New Hampshire
Registered: 2004-07-22
Posts: 28,747

Re: Martian air breathing engine

The real issue is what can we do with the engine which has landed with the use of a different landing fuel?

Offline

#27 2022-06-16 22:56:15

RGClark
Member
From: Philadelphia, PA
Registered: 2006-07-05
Posts: 695
Website

Re: Martian air breathing engine

Calliban wrote:

If we can seperate CO from the atmosphere relatively cheaply, then the gas shift reaction can be used to make other fuels.

H20 + CO = H2 + CO2. 

Thanks for that. I was thinking of simple filtration of CO and O2 at low energy cost out of the Martian atmosphere a la the NASA proposal mentioned by Calliban rather than by the high energy chemical breakdown of CO2 to produce propellant for CO+O2 propulsion. But this would be a low energy propulsion method. But if we can also get H2 via the reaction H20 + CO —> H2 + CO2, then we could also get the high energy H2+O2 propulsion.

  Robert Clark


Old Space rule of acquisition (with a nod to Star Trek - the Next Generation):

      “Anything worth doing is worth doing for a billion dollars.”

Offline

#28 2022-06-17 00:34:41

RGClark
Member
From: Philadelphia, PA
Registered: 2006-07-05
Posts: 695
Website

Re: Martian air breathing engine

SpaceNut wrote:

The real issue is what can we do with the engine which has landed with the use of a different landing fuel?

You can also make CH4 once you have H2 if your engine uses CH4. The amount of energy needed if done by chemical breakdown for the propellant production for the return trip is so high that it’s a serious limitation on ISRU plans for propellant. Robert Zubrin suggested a nuclear fission plant for example. And solar panels would require huge area to be covered on Mars with a great mass needed to be transported there.

See this video for a discussion of the issue:

SpaceX Starship can return from Mars without surface refilling.
2-DB263-CC-E364-40-DF-BD8-D-AF8779-F38-DF3.png
https://youtu.be/u55zpE4r-_Y

Beginning at about the 12 minute point, the author runs the numbers and considers it so daunting, at least for initial missions, that he suggests it might be better instead to transport the propellant from Earth with multiple Starship tanker flights all the way to Mars.


  Robert Clark


Old Space rule of acquisition (with a nod to Star Trek - the Next Generation):

      “Anything worth doing is worth doing for a billion dollars.”

Offline

#29 2022-06-18 05:29:13

SpaceNut
Administrator
From: New Hampshire
Registered: 2004-07-22
Posts: 28,747

Re: Martian air breathing engine

Engines that are made to burn hydrogen would need modifications to burn methane but engines that burn hydrogel, would be a real problem since manufacturing those from scratch have not been done outside of the industrial manufacturing for use.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB