Debug: Database connection successful Should SpaceX consider using SRBs on Falcon 9? (Page 2) / Interplanetary transportation / New Mars Forums

New Mars Forums

Official discussion forum of The Mars Society and MarsNews.com

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Announcement: This forum has successfully made it through the upgraded. Please login.

#26 2017-08-09 18:13:34

SpaceNut
Administrator
From: New Hampshire
Registered: 2004-07-22
Posts: 29,436

Re: Should SpaceX consider using SRBs on Falcon 9?

Gubbering and Frankenstiening were the terms thrown out there when the first shttle derived vehicle was being discussed from from mix and mtch parts from boeing, lockheed and shuttle to create the first SLV designs....Then came constellation which argued about man rating and the 2 rocket combination.... Then came the current version of SLS.....starting 2004 to current all funds basically for workfare.....

Offline

Like button can go here

#27 2017-08-10 07:58:41

Oldfart1939
Member
Registered: 2016-11-26
Posts: 2,462

Re: Should SpaceX consider using SRBs on Falcon 9?

One problem brought about through creation of ULA is monopolistic pricing policies, and the lobbying for "workfare." The elected representatives are loath to stop it in various states where the OldSpace companies reside. The biggest issue is the cost-plus style contracts issued by the guberment. The SLS seems to be the most egregious example that immediately comes to mind.

There's an old joke about camels: "A camel is a horse designed by a committee;" I'm changing it to "A camel is a horse designed and built by a cost-plus government contractor."

Offline

Like button can go here

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB