New Mars Forums
You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Announcement
#1 2007-12-29 20:16:35
- gaetanomarano
- Member
- From: Italy
- Registered: 2006-05-06
- Posts: 701
Re: >>> Why the 5-segments SRB is a NONSENSE >>>
.
as explained in my latest ghostNASA article:
http://www.ghostnasa.com/posts/018srb5nonsense.html
the new 5-segments SRB has (at least) SIX BIG PROBLEMS and only ONE advantage:
"1.3 mT of extra payload mass!!!"
YES, so many BIG problems, risks, dalays and extra-costs to just carry 1.3 mT of extra payload mass!!!
please say me if that is not a giant, absurd, ridiculous and incredible NONSENSE!!!
.
[url=http://www.gaetanomarano.it]gaetanomarano.it[/url]
[url=http://www.ghostnasa.com]ghostNASA.com[/url]
Offline
Like button can go here
#2 2007-12-29 21:08:34
Re: >>> Why the 5-segments SRB is a NONSENSE >>>
gaetanomarano, these persistent and blatant promotions of your website have now reached the level of spam. Furthermore, creating a new topic for this purpose is unacceptable. If you have something specific to say, say it in an appropriate topic. Please remove your message
I am going to create a thread for you in science and technology. It will be called 'gaetanomarano's opinions on space exploration'. Please post things like this there.
-Josh
Offline
Like button can go here
#3 2007-12-30 03:24:26
- gaetanomarano
- Member
- From: Italy
- Registered: 2006-05-06
- Posts: 701
Re: >>> Why the 5-segments SRB is a NONSENSE >>>
I am going to create a thread for you in science and technology. It will be called 'gaetanomarano's opinions on space exploration'.
thanks for the idea but all my proposals (rockets, refuels, capsules, etc.) and opinins (SRB, Ares-1, etc.) are about the "interplanetary trasportation" (not a generic "science and technology") also, each argument is so different to be difficult to follow (for me and the readers) in a single "mega thread" ... if a thread has with a mix of 10, 20 or more arguments, the users MUST read also the post they don't like ... since this section hosts (surely good) arguments like "flingers", "magnetic acceleration rings", "H2O+UV", "warp drive", etc. I hope there is enough space to host arguments about the ARES-1, ORION, ARES-5, ALTAIR, ESAS, MOON MISSIONS ARCHITECTURES, ROCKETS, ETC.
[post update] please note that, nearly ALL arguments in my blog and/or posted here, involves very important problems, like:
- the spaceflights' safety
- the astronauts' lives
- the ESAS plan chances of success
- the NASA/ESAS/VSE budget and its use
- the (manned and unmanned) rockets' design flaws
- etc.
.
[url=http://www.gaetanomarano.it]gaetanomarano.it[/url]
[url=http://www.ghostnasa.com]ghostNASA.com[/url]
Offline
Like button can go here
#4 2007-12-30 06:30:52
- Terraformer
- Member
- From: The Fortunate Isles
- Registered: 2007-08-27
- Posts: 3,909
- Website
Re: >>> Why the 5-segments SRB is a NONSENSE >>>
No-one has said why a flinger wouldn't work.
Use what is abundant and build to last
Offline
Like button can go here
#5 2007-12-30 07:43:49
- gaetanomarano
- Member
- From: Italy
- Registered: 2006-05-06
- Posts: 701
Re: >>> Why the 5-segments SRB is a NONSENSE >>>
No-one has said why a flinger wouldn't work.
just said that all Ares-1 arguments have (at least) the same merit to be posted in the same section 
.
[url=http://www.gaetanomarano.it]gaetanomarano.it[/url]
[url=http://www.ghostnasa.com]ghostNASA.com[/url]
Offline
Like button can go here
#6 2008-01-07 10:19:20
- Antius
- Member
- From: Cumbria, UK
- Registered: 2007-05-22
- Posts: 1,003
Re: >>> Why the 5-segments SRB is a NONSENSE >>>
No-one has said why a flinger wouldn't work.
just said that all Ares-1 arguments have (at least) the same merit to be posted in the same section
.
From a cost effectiveness point of view NONE of the conventional rocket vehicle concepts make very much sense.
Offline
Like button can go here