Debug: Database connection successful
You are not logged in.
.
Rand Simberg reports about the Boeing's Space Gas Station concept in this (September 25, 2007) Popular Mechanics article:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science … 24660.html
however, it looks pretty close to MY (Aug. 12, 2007) article's update about an orbital refuel concept for the ESAS plan:
http://www.gaetanomarano.it/articles/031easyways.html
as explained in this ghostNASA article:
http://www.ghostnasa.com/posts/011orbitalrefuel.html
.
[url=http://www.gaetanomarano.it]gaetanomarano.it[/url]
[url=http://www.ghostnasa.com]ghostNASA.com[/url]
Offline
Like button can go here
I'm not sure about this. Won't launching this station require plenty of launches to sustain, and until propellant production is established on the Moon everything still comes from Earth. All that'd be done is add an unessicary hitch in the plan.
Personally following the Mars Direct example is a better idea; i.e. send an unmanned lander that days there.
Offline
Like button can go here
I'm not sure about this. Won't launching this station require plenty of launches to sustain, and until propellant production is established on the Moon everything still comes from Earth. All that'd be done is add an unessicary hitch in the plan.
clearly, the orbital refuel can work only if the propellents will be launched with very low cost rockets
if that fuel is launched with an AresV the price don't change but just add ome complexity to the flight plan
.
[url=http://www.gaetanomarano.it]gaetanomarano.it[/url]
[url=http://www.ghostnasa.com]ghostNASA.com[/url]
Offline
Like button can go here
Eliminating assembly eliminates costs.
Offline
Like button can go here