Debug: Database connection successful
You are not logged in.
I had a hard time believing that Nasa would do such a study..
[url=http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19910014907_1991014907.pdf]Feasibility Analysis of Cislunar Flight Using the
Shuttle Orbiter[/url]
Davy A. Haynes, Space Exploration, Langley Research
Hampton, Virginia, Initiative Office Center
June 1991
The vehicle would utilize the orbiter's main engines and would have a fully-fueled external tank, which will have been carried into orbit by the Shuttle and then refueled at Space Station Freedom by Shuttle-C tankers.
The results of the analysis indicate that the Shuttle orbiter would be a poor vehicle for payload delivery missions to lunar orbit. The maximum payload to a circular 100 km lunar orbit is only about 3.2 mt.
Why such a small amount of payload when a shuttle cargo bay would normally yield in excess of 17 mt? While 10 Shuttle C to refuel the ET is crazy...
Offline
Like button can go here
What ever induced you to search out this mission concept? Did you, literally, or was it by chance? Well, after reading it, I think the study was worth whatever it cost the taxpayers: it shows how careful analyses of off-the-top-of-the-head ideas can be taken to their conclusions on paper and archived to be read and understand, and if not found wanting set aside without prejudice by new-to-the field enthusiasts in favour of more promising concepts. What a relief!
Offline
Like button can go here
I had a hard time believing that Nasa would do such a study..
[url=http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19910014907_1991014907.pdf]Feasibility Analysis of Cislunar Flight Using the
Shuttle Orbiter[/url]Davy A. Haynes, Space Exploration, Langley Research
Hampton, Virginia, Initiative Office CenterJune 1991
The vehicle would utilize the orbiter's main engines and would have a fully-fueled external tank, which will have been carried into orbit by the Shuttle and then refueled at Space Station Freedom by Shuttle-C tankers.
The results of the analysis indicate that the Shuttle orbiter would be a poor vehicle for payload delivery missions to lunar orbit. The maximum payload to a circular 100 km lunar orbit is only about 3.2 mt.
Why such a small amount of payload when a shuttle cargo bay would normally yield in excess of 17 mt? While 10 Shuttle C to refuel the ET is crazy...
LOL! So that's where Homer Hickam got his idea!
"We go big, or we don't go." - GCNRevenger
Offline
Like button can go here
Actually just happened onto it in a thread located elsewhere on another forum.
The last movie that I saw with the twin shuttle cis-lunar was in Armageddon with Bruce Wilis and his misfit oil rig drillers playing astronaut to blow up the impending asteriod dooming earth to destruction.
Offline
Like button can go here
I had a hard time believing that Nasa would do such a study..
[url=http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19910014907_1991014907.pdf]Feasibility Analysis of Cislunar Flight Using the
Shuttle Orbiter[/url]Davy A. Haynes, Space Exploration, Langley Research
Hampton, Virginia, Initiative Office CenterJune 1991
The vehicle would utilize the orbiter's main engines and would have a fully-fueled external tank, which will have been carried into orbit by the Shuttle and then refueled at Space Station Freedom by Shuttle-C tankers.
The results of the analysis indicate that the Shuttle orbiter would be a poor vehicle for payload delivery missions to lunar orbit. The maximum payload to a circular 100 km lunar orbit is only about 3.2 mt.
Why such a small amount of payload when a shuttle cargo bay would normally yield in excess of 17 mt? While 10 Shuttle C to refuel the ET is crazy...
LOL! So that's where Homer Hickam got his idea!
Energiya would have done a better job. Just omit the orbiter!
I remember seeing some wide, dish-shaped aerobrake disks to be launched by Shuttle-C.
One place where side payload mount beats in-line is in launcing oddly shaped outsized payloads that do not lend themselves to being top mount.
Energiya could launch a wide disk to aerobrake--but be left in space. The actual modules would be launched by other Energiya shots.
Offline
Like button can go here