You are not logged in.
http://www.kistleraerospace.com]http://www.kistleraerospace.com
I was just wondering if you guys thought that this company could be the one that has the most potential to develop like AM&M from the HobbySpace Rocket company article.
http://www.hobbyspace.com/AAdmin/archiv … ...ge.html
It says they own the patent to the two stage rocket developed by the author.
Danny------> MontrealRacing.com
Offline
The AM&M guys were crazy if they think they can so anything with such a small payload. At least the Kistler has a more reasonable figure.
[i]"The power of accurate observation is often called cynicism by those that do not have it." - George Bernard Shaw[/i]
[i]The glass is at 50% of capacity[/i]
Offline
Heatedly
Bascially coming down to the fact that constructing anything in orbit with such small payloads was impractical, and that the AM&M puny rocket just couldn't carry enough payload.
[i]"The power of accurate observation is often called cynicism by those that do not have it." - George Bernard Shaw[/i]
[i]The glass is at 50% of capacity[/i]
Offline
So, what does Kistler Aerospace estimate their cost per kg to LEO will be? And how reusable will the vehicle be? And what are the chances anyone will take them seriously for resupplying ISS?
-- RobS
Offline
Kistler has the N-1's curse on it from using those NK-33/43 engines--just like SLC-6
Give it up--its jinxed.
Offline