New Mars Forums

Official discussion forum of The Mars Society and MarsNews.com

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Announcement: This forum is accepting new registrations via email. Please see Recruiting Topic for additional information. Write newmarsmember[at_symbol]gmail.com.

#201 Not So Free Chat » Trump Proposes U.S. ‘Space Force’ to Guard the Galaxy » 2018-03-13 18:38:57

EdwardHeisler
Replies: 156

Trump Proposes U.S. ‘Space Force’ to Guard the Galaxy
March 13, 2018
Daily Beast

President Donald Trump said Tuesday he wants to create a U.S. “Space Force” during a speech before service members at Marine Corps Air Station Miramar in San Diego. "My new national strategy for space recognizes that space is a war-fighting domain, just like the land air and sea. We may even have a Space Force," Trump said. "We're doing a tremendous amount of work in space, and I said, maybe we need a new force. We'll call it the Space Force." Trump was most likely referring to the National Defense Authorization Act, which was signed into law on December 12th and stipulates that the defense secretary "establish in the executive part of the Department of the Air Force a Space Corps." Back in July, senior Air Force officials told CNN that the corps was an “unnecessary change in the force's existing space efforts.”

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-pro … the-galaxy

This is a major step towards a militarization of the governments space exploration program.    Hundreds of billions will be spent for outer space "warriors" amidst declining peanuts for scientific space exploration and NASA.

So what happens if China, Russia and India respond in kind?   I think we all know the inevitable result of any "space war" between major powers.   It would mean a rapid escalation to total war, the nuclear kind.   Trump like some of his worst nutcase followers think the United States would win World War III just as the US would "easily" win a trade war against the rest of the world. 

We must reject such reactionary and regressive perspectives and embrace the peaceful and scientific exploration of our solar system and beyond.

Trumpy and his cult like knuckelheads probably believe his Space Force will stop a new "bigley" invasion of illegal aliens from other star systems in light of recently disclosed Air Force encounters with UFO's.     Yikes!

03172018-Meet-Greet-to-Knuckleheads-in-Rockmart.jpg

#202 Re: Not So Free Chat » NASA's Lightfoot Retiring! Many Trump Science Positions Remain Vacant » 2018-03-13 13:33:04

SpaceNut wrote:

Steve Jurczyk Named Acting NASA Associate Administrator, https://www.nasa.gov/about/org_index.html

This is the position that Robert Lightfoot held before being named as Acting NASA Administrator. NASA currently has no Acting Deputy Administrator or Chief of Staff. James Reuter will replace Jurczyk as Associate Administrator for the Space Technology Mission Directorate.

And the Trump governments nomination for NASA Chief Financial Officer, Jeffrey DeWit , has not been confirmed.   The Trump government has not nominated anyone to fill the vacant position of NASA Deputy Administrator.

Is that correct?

#203 Re: Not So Free Chat » NASA's Lightfoot Retiring! Many Trump Science Positions Remain Vacant » 2018-03-13 10:11:27

Trump wants a lapdog "yes man" NASA administrator who pledges their personal loyalty to him and not to the constitution and people.     Bridenstine fits the bill and that's why Trump is sticking with him.

#204 Not So Free Chat » NASA's Lightfoot Retiring! Many Trump Science Positions Remain Vacant » 2018-03-12 20:58:08

EdwardHeisler
Replies: 6

[Excerpt]

NASA’s acting administrator to retire without a clear successor
by Ben Guarino
March 12, 2018
Washington Post

Robert M. Lightfoot Jr., who has served as acting administrator at NASA for more than a year, said Monday that he will retire from his position in April. No immediate announcement was made on who will follow him.

In an agencywide memo, Lightfoot wrote that he had “bittersweet feelings” about the decision. He also said he will “work with the White House on a smooth transition to the new administrator.”

NASA has been without a permanent administrator since Charles Bolden, a former astronaut and retired Marine Corps aviator, resigned the day that President Trump took office last year. The second-in-command, deputy administrator Dava Newman, also left the agency as Trump was inaugurated. In stepped Lightfoot, who had held NASA's highest-ranking non-appointee position.

In September, Trump nominated Jim Bridenstine, a Republican congressman who represents Oklahoma in the House, to be NASA administrator. Bridenstine previously worked as the director of the Tulsa Air and Space Museum. He supports an increased role of private industry in spaceflight.

Bridenstine's confirmation process has not gone smoothly. At a hearing in November, Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) argued that Bridenstine lacked the ability to be “a leader who has the ability to unite scientists, engineers, commercial space interests, policymakers and the public on a shared vision for future space exploration.” Senate Democrats have been joined by Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) in opposition to Bridenstine, putting the nominee's future in jeopardy.

In an email late Monday, a NASA representative wrote that “the White House may direct anyone who qualifies under the Vacancies Reform Act to serve as acting NASA Administrator.” ]The agency also has no chief of staff or deputy director.

Of the seats normally filled by scientists or engineers in Washington, many remain empty. The White House does not have a science adviser, and other positions in the Office of Science and Technology Policy remain vacant. Trump also has yet to appoint members to the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/spe … 41010b14e0

Note:  The Trump governments nomination for NASA Chief Financial Officer, Jeffrey DeWit , has not been confirmed.   The Trump government has not nominated anyone to fill the vacant position of NASA Deputy Administrator.

#205 Re: Not So Free Chat » Politics » 2018-03-10 16:27:25

Terraformer wrote:

Oh please. Most people know the difference between being allowed to enter a place and not being allowed to leave it. The walls around most buildings (schools and prisons excepted) are there to keep people out, not keep people in.

Or do you actually think people were trying to flee into East Germany, and they built the wall to avoid being overwhelmed?

The Berlin Wall was built to keep "east" Germans in.   A Trump wall of both sides of our border could have a dual use.   Keep furinners out and Mericans in.    Or as Trump the self-proclaimed genius would write:  HAPPY HAPPY!  GOODY GOODY! NOT SAD

#207 Re: Not So Free Chat » Russia's Space Agency Might Break Up With the U.S. To Get With China » 2018-03-09 16:45:09

The real question is for how long will China continue to prop up the U.S. economy?    They could cash in and stop buying treasury notes if Trump engages in unfair trade war actions against Chinese capitalists.

That's several trillion dollars pulled out of the economy that used to subsidize the national debt.

The Chinese are doing very well without any U.S. economic help.    They are leading or soon will be leading the world in economic and technological development. 

Go to China and see it for yourself.    Don't be easily taken in by old cold war propaganda.    China and Russia are no longer "communist" nations and governments.   They went capitalist with strong government regulations and controls (especially in China} which capitalists just hate in the United States.

I don't have time to cite all of their major economic and scientific achievements over the past several years.   That would be a very long and impressive list.   

Some right-wing Chinese are very skeptical about engaging in joint efforts with American captalists.   They are worried that the United States might "steal" their technology.   

But they like and trust Elon Musk.    He will produce Tesla's in China and perhaps may enter agreements to collaborate with Chinese scientists and their government on space exploration.

Hope they do!

#208 Not So Free Chat » From all the women at SpaceX, happy International Women's Day! » 2018-03-08 17:13:18

EdwardHeisler
Replies: 2

From all the women at SpaceX who are helping to engineer the future of space exploration, happy International Women’s Day!

DXyJmxDV4AEDOZ9.jpg

#209 Not So Free Chat » Russia's Space Agency Might Break Up With the U.S. To Get With China » 2018-03-08 17:02:23

EdwardHeisler
Replies: 14

Russia's Space Agency Might Break Up With the U.S. To Get With China
After almost three decades of cooperation, Roscosmos is now eyeing a future in space with China.
By Anatoly Zak
March 7, 201
Popular Mechanics

Last month Russia’s space agency, Roscosmos State Corporation, began work on a contingency plan that would reshape its future in space exploration. The country could shift its human spaceflight cooperation from the U.S. to China, sources within Roscosmos told Popular Mechanics. One possible scenario includes Roscosmos exiting the International Space Station program early.
Russian experts were instructed to put forward ideas by March 15, including concepts for potential contributions to the planned Chinese space station along with a joint Russian-Chinese plans to send humans to the Moon.

A Historic Relationship

If adopted, the new strategy would mark a historic moment for the Russian space program, which has cooperated with the U.S. for nearly three decades. In 1993, not long after the breakup of the USS, the Russian and American human spaceflight programs (along with Europe, Canada, and Japan) joined together to build the ISS. Lately, though, worsening relations between Moscow and Washington have prompted Roscosmos to seek its own way in space, which could happen before or after the ISS’s current expiration date some time between 2024 and 2028.

For a number of years, the Kremlin considered building an independent program for human spaceflight with plans ranging from a relatively modest space station in the Earth’s orbit to ambitious proposals to build a permanent base on the Moon. But under current economic strains, the Russian government needed an international partner—at least for the time being.

Last summer, Moscow reluctantly agreed to join NASA-led studies of a habitable outpost in orbit around the Moon that would succeed the ISS in mid-2020s. While the near-lunar station remains on the drawing board even as U.S.-Russian relations sour, Roscosmos decided to look at the alternatives. At the end of February, the corporation instructed its strategists to evaluate cooperation with China by supplying Russian hardware for the Chinese space station.

In 2020, Beijing plans to launch the first piece of its new multi-modular outpost similar to the Russian Mir space station. For a number of years, Chinese space officials have been inviting other space powers to contribute to the planned orbital base, but the response was lukewarm due to financial and political concerns. Now there are signs that the situation might be slowly turning to China’s favor. Besides Russia, the European Space Agency, ESA, and Japan are now reportedly re-examining their participation in the Chinese space station project.

A Mismatch Made in Space

In June 2017, Roscosmos head Igor Komarov said that Russia had been invited to participate in the Chinese space station but admitted to a mismatch in plans. Russian engineers first considered the country’s active involvement in the Chinese space station in 2015, but at the time, Roscosmos hoped that China would assemble its outpost in the orbit easily accessible from Baikonur Cosmodrome, which Russia rents from Kazakhstan.

Since then, China informed its potential contributors that the station would be inserted into an orbit inclined between 41 and 43 degrees toward the Equator. Baikonur is situated at a latitude of 46 degrees, which means that the Russian missions heading to the Chinese space station would have to conduct propellant-hungry maneuvers to reduce their orbital inclination.

One partial solution to this orbital mismatch between Russia and China would be the Sea Launch platform. The Russian-owned, California-based floating launch pad offers flexibility in accessing various orbits thanks to its ability to sail to the most convenient launch position. A Russian private company is currently working on reactivating the Sea Launch after a long hiatus.

Sea Launch would currently only launch robotic cargo vehicles and space station modules, leaving open the issue of delivering Russian cosmonauts to the Chinese space station. According to industry sources, Roscosmos was unlikely to agree for its cosmonauts to hitchhike to the station aboard the Chinese Shenzhou vehicles, as China proposed, without having full access to the station with its own passenger spacecraft.

To the Moon and Back
On Saturday, Roskosmos and China National Space Administration, CNSA, signed a memorandum of intentions on possible joint effort in the exploration of the Moon with robotic probes.

Russia considers yet-to-be-launched automated lunar landers as precursors for the future habitable lunar base which would be built in the polar regions of the Moon. China also tabled preliminary plans to send expeditions to the Moon after finishing the assembly of its space station. Russia and China could see their goals in space converge if the U.S. fails to fully draw in one of these two countries into its own orbit.

The latest Russian overtures to China are in very early stages and might not result in any actual change in policy. The U.S. also wouldn't be completely left out in the cold, but would be forced to consider commercial spaceflight options, like SpaceX or United Launch Alliance. But the mere fact that such an option is on the table at Roscosmos’ headquarters is a huge deal, and the final decision, whatever it might be, could have long-running implications for the future of human space flight in all three countries.

https://www.popularmechanics.com/space/ … cialflowTW

#210 Re: Human missions » Name for settlers on Mars » 2018-03-05 22:33:49

How about "Mars Settlers"?   It's simple and accurate and everyone understands it.

#212 Not So Free Chat » Russia, China Strike Deal to Jointly Explore Outer Space » 2018-03-03 17:59:07

EdwardHeisler
Replies: 4

Russia, China Strike Deal to Jointly Explore Outer Space
SputnikNews.com
March 3, 2018


MOSCOW (Sputnik) - Russian State Space Corporation Rosсosmos and the China National Space Administration signed on Saturday the agreement of intent for cooperation in the sphere of exploration of the Moon and the Outer space as well as on the creation of the Joint Data Center on the Lunar projects, the corporation said in a statement.

According to the statement, the State Corporation Roscosmos and the China National Space Administration aim to cooperate in the sphere of exploration of the Moon and the Outer space as well as on the establishment of the Joint Data Center on the Lunar projects.

"The sides have expressed readiness to consider the possibility of cooperation on the implementation of the Russian mission to launch the Luna-Resurs-1 (Luna-26) orbital spacecraft in 2022, as well as on the planned Chinese mission for landing in the region of the southern pole of the Moon in 2023," the corporation added.

The agreement was signed at the ongoing International Space Exploration Forum (ISEF) in Tokyo.

The Russian-Chinese cooperation on the exploration of outer space is developing rapidly. On June 25, 2016, the two governments signed an agreement pact that sets out a legal frame work for protecting their rights to sensitive space technologies in joint projects, Russian state space agency Roscosmos said.

https://sputniknews.com/science/2018030 … ploration/

#213 Re: Science, Technology, and Astronomy » Hello! Peeps :) » 2018-02-27 19:54:18

Here's my doggie "Cuddles".

Warrigul.jpg

top-10-coolest-fictitious-animals-in-movies-t-L-7PR9NZ.jpeg

Let's make arrangements for Cuddles and Rosco to meet.   Cuddles would like Rosco to come over for dinner.   Cuddles is hungry!

#214 Re: Not So Free Chat » Not all women feel this way - » 2018-02-22 12:28:01

Terraformer wrote:
Ed Heisler wrote:

Donald Trump

He's really gotten under your skin, hasn't he? Never miss an opportunity to reference him.

I'm sure the self-proclaimed really smart genius can teach us a great deal regarding the exploration of Mars and he will lead the way!

I think Trump should be invited to address our next Mars Society convention.    We can listen and learn!   Don't you agree?

Of course, he won't be reading a speech off a teleprompter written by someone else.

He could always tweet us.  What a treat that tweet would be!

Trump makes everyone proud to be Merican!

All hail the most intelligent and wonderful leader!   He ain't just a pretty face.

Donald-Trump-Funny-Smiling-Picture.jpg

#215 Re: Not So Free Chat » Not all women feel this way - » 2018-02-22 12:16:46

clark wrote:

I Dismiss her out of hand and learn nothing, or use this as an opportunity to better understand the current flaws in our approach to mars.

What has she ever written or said to help us "understand flaws in our approach to mars"? 

If you can find something articulating her views on how humans, women and men, should explore Mars please post the link.

#216 Re: Not So Free Chat » Not all women feel this way - » 2018-02-21 21:43:54

Here's one effective reply to her uninformed article:

Nikopol
@Nikopol5 

Follow @Nikopol5
       
Replying to @NBCNewsTHINK @MarcieBianco

Meanwhile SpaceX president is a woman, @GwynneShotwell

I guess she is also patriarchal. Such a bunch of baloney in one article is difficult to replicate.

And here's another.

[Excerpt]

NBC Columnist Says Space Travel Is Just Another Example Of ‘Toxic Masculinity’
by Jena Greene
The Smoke Room

Our girl Marcie just wrote a column for NBC titled “The Patriarchal Race To Colonize Mars Is Just Another Example Of Male Entitlement.” I know, I know. You’re probably thinking, “With everything going on in the world today, this chick is actually concerned about protecting the rights of ice crystals on Mars?” And the answer to that would be: yes.

More specifically, Bianco is concerned about Elon Musk’s recent venture into space via his Falcon Heavy rocket.

"These men, particularly Musk, are not only heavily invested in who can get their rocket into space first, but in colonizing Mars,” she writes. “The desire to colonize — to have unquestioned, unchallenged and automatic access to something, to any type of body, and to use it at will — is a patriarchal one. Indeed, there is no ethical consideration among these billionaires about whether this should be done…It is the same instinctual and cultural force that teaches men that everything — and everyone — in their line of vision is theirs for the taking. You know, just like walking up to a woman and grabbing her by the p*ssy".

Now I’m a 24-year-old female. I wouldn’t presume to be woke but I like to think I’ve got my finger on the pulse. And I think I would know if Mars — a planet with an average temperature of -80 degrees Fahrenheit — had any sort of female genitalia in danger of colonization. But the last time I checked, we’re not even sure Mars has sustainable life.

I find it a bit troubling that Marcie Bianco is so overly concerned with colonization and Mars’s human rights. Brutally colonizing places like Hitler did in Rwanda is no good. But I really don’t think that’s Elon Musk’s plan here.

Liberal crusaders like Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos and Richard Branson should be hailed as heroes by people like Marcie Bianco.

“Apparently, caring for the planet is perceived to be a ‘feminine’ quality and concern; the psychology of toxic masculinity spills over into the unethical disregard for the environment,” she writes. “This masculine insecurity is everywhere in American culture and, increasingly, American politics.”

Well, literally nobody has ever said recycling is a gendered thing. Sure, it might make you a wimp. But it doesn’t make you a girl. Also, I’m not sure if Bianco has access to an encyclopedia but Elon Musk is not, in fact, American. He’s South African. So scratch that little dig off your argument against the inventor and go back to purveying “Fine Italian Lesbian Meats,” as you claim to do on Twitter.

http://smokeroom.com/2018/02/21/space-t … sculinity/

It appears that Marcie is even less knowledgeable on matters relating to space exploration and the enormous contributions of women than Donald Trump!    Yikes!   Ed Heisler

#217 Unmanned probes » Cancelling WFIRST Telescope Will Permanently Ruin NASA » 2018-02-20 20:37:15

EdwardHeisler
Replies: 8

[Excerpt]

Feb 20, 2018 
Forbes
Cancelling WFIRST Will Permanently Ruin NASA
by Ethan Siegel

Last week, the White House released their plans for the 2018 fiscal year budget. Across many metrics and departments, it was a bloodbath, gutting about $50 billion from agencies focused on science, health, food, arts, humanities, the environment, and education, among many others. But among the reductions was one murderous stroke to NASA: the elimination its flagship mission of the coming decade, WFIRST. The Wide-Field Infrared Space Telescope was chosen by NASA to be the single most important astrophysics mission of the 2020s, and has been in the early planning stages for nearly 20 years. Countless astronomers and astrophysicists have spend their entire professional lives working to make this mission happen, and teach us things we'll never know, otherwise, about the Universe. Cancelling it is a decision that must be revoked, or NASA will cease to be the leading science and space agency for planet Earth.

While it's disastrous for the agency to consider the loss of five of its Earth science missions and the elimination of its office of education, the loss of WFIRST would be an incomparable disaster for the agency.

According to Thomas Zurbuchen, Associate Administrator for the Science Mission Directorate of NASA:

What we learn from these flagship missions is why we study the Universe. This is civilization-scale science... If we don't do this, we aren't NASA.

This was a statement he made just last month at NASA's Town Hall at the American Astronomical Society's annual meeting. WFIRST was selected as the #1 overall mission for the 2020s back in 2010; it's a mission that takes approximately 15 years to design, contract, execute, build, deliver, and launch. In terms of science, it planned to primarily serve a number of major communities within astronomy and astrophysics: supernova research, extragalactic astronomers, exoplanet researchers, studies of the galactic center, and wide-field studies that focus on gravitational lensing and properties of the cosmic web.

The way it's poised to do this is by taking a telescope that's similar in optical properties to Hubble, but by outfitting it with all-new instruments optimized for a wide-field view of the Universe. Instead of being limited to a narrow slice of the Universe, WFIRST could image it just as deeply as Hubble, except 60 times as quickly. The "WF" stands for Wide-Field for a reason; the amount of Universe it can image is huge! And as a result, the amount we can learn about the Universe is huge as well.

Some of our greatest existential questions would be answered by WFIRST. How does dark energy behave, for example? Does it evolve over time? Is it uniform in all directions? Do the results from supernovae, the cosmic web, and extragalactic signals all point to the same set of properties? WFIRST would answer all of these questions as no other mission, past, present, or even proposed, would be capable of.

In 2010, the National Research Council's Astronomy and Astrophysics Decadal Survey made WFIRST the top priority recommendation in the large space mission category. They also made a recommendation that they add on significant capabilities for exoplanet studies, including a state-of-the-art coronagraph, and those are being implemented. By monitoring a large sample of stars in the Milky Way's center, WFIRST will allow us to detect, via subtle changes in brightness, the presence of exoplanets that NASA's Kepler could never have seen. We will learn how common Earth-like planets are around a wide variety of stars and over a very large range of orbital parameters.

In addition, like all such flagship missions, including Hubble and James Webb, there will be a guest observer program. Not only will research in galactic, extragalactic, exoplanet, gravitational lensing, baryon acoustic oscillation and supernova sub-fields be considered, but any astrophysical topic that could take advantage of WFIRST's unique capabilities can propose. This is poised to be the leading observatory for a wide slew of purposes for not just a few years, but — like Hubble — potentially for decades.

It was the top choice out of all the missions that the entire astronomy and astrophysics community proposed. It represented a huge effort in collaboration between groups with widely disparate interests and passions, and allowed cosmologists and exoplanet scientists to work together on putting together a mission that these non-overlapping communities could both benefit from. It included the possibility of a starshade, which would enable planet-finding and measurement to an unprecedented level.

And with a nuclear stroke from the Trump administration, it all threatens to crumble away.

We absolutely cannot let this project go down without a fight. If WFIRST gets cancelled, it's a sign that even the most important NASA project, as determined by internal, external, and independent reviewers, is subject to political whims. These projects take more than a single presidency to design, approve, build, and launch. Federal funding for these vital missions that enhance all of society must not be allowed to disappear because one human — even if it's the president — wills it. The joys, wonder, knowledge, and benefits that come from exploring and understanding the Universe are greater than any individual.

25 years ago, the Superconducting Supercollider (SSC) was cancelled, and today, the United States doesn't even have a major particle physics facility in the same league as the LHC at CERN, which is itself a vastly inferior machine to what the SSC would have been. The United States must not cede leadership in the space and science arena to Japan, Russia, Europe, China, India and Canada in the same way. Humanity's capability of understanding the entire Universe is at stake.

Read the full article at:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswith … 617ac957b0

#218 Interplanetary transportation » NASA spends 1 Billion for SLS Launch Tower that "leans and bends"!!! » 2018-02-20 20:18:32

EdwardHeisler
Replies: 3

[Excerpt]


NASA spends $1 billion for a launch tower that leans, may only be used once
kopitiambot
2018-02-21
(Source: arstechnica.com)

On Tuesday and Wednesday Vice President Mike Pence will travel to Kennedy Space Center in Florida to tour facilities there and participate in the second meeting of the National Space Council. It is not clear how much of the launch facilities he will see during his visit to Florida, where NASA is spending billions of dollars to build ground systems for the launch of the Space Launch System rocket.

There is one component of the revamped facilities that NASA may be reluctant to show Pence, who in effect oversees all national spaceflight activities as the head of the space council. This is the “mobile launcher” structure, which supports the testing and servicing of the massive SLS rocket, as well as moving it to the launch pad and providing a platform from which it will launch.

According to a new report in NASASpaceflight.com, the expensive tower is “leaning” and “bending.” For now, NASA says, the lean is not sufficient enough to require corrective action, but it is developing contingency plans in case the lean angle becomes steeper.

These defects raise concerns about the longevity of the launch tower and increase the likelihood that NASA will seek additional funding to build a second one. In fact, it is entirely possible that the launch tower may serve only for the maiden flight of the SLS rocket in 2020 and then be cast aside. This would represent a significant waste of resources by the space agency.

A very costly tower

Construction on the structure began nine years ago when NASA needed a mobile launcher for a different rocket, the Ares I vehicle. According to NASA’s inspector general, Paul Martin, the agency spent $234 million to originally build the launch tower. However, after the government’s Ares I and V rockets were canceled due to delays and cost overruns in 2010, NASA was left without much of a use for the large structure, which consists of a two-story base, a 355-foot-tall tower, and facility ground support systems.

In 2011, after Congress directed NASA to build a new large rocket, the SLS, the agency began studying its options to launch the booster. These trade studies found that modifying the existing mobile launcher would cost $54 million, modifying the Space Shuttle Mobile Launcher Platforms would cost $93 million, and constructing a new mobile launch platform would cost $122 million. Ultimately, the agency opted for the lowest-cost option—modifying the Ares mobile launcher—but unfortunately those preliminary cost estimates turned out to be wildly optimistic.

Instead of costing just $54 million, the US Government Accountability Office found that NASA spent $281.8 million revamping the mobile launcher from fiscal years 2012 to 2015, but still the work was not done. The recently released White House budget for fiscal year 2019 reveals that NASA anticipates spending an additional $396.2 million on the mobile launcher from 2015 through the maiden launch of the SLS, probably in 2020.

Therefore, from the tower’s inception in 2009, NASA will have spent $912 million on the mobile launcher it may use for just a single launch of the SLS rocket. Moreover, the agency will have required eight years to modify a launch tower it built in two years.

KSC-20170525-PH_LCH01_0053_large-800x533.jpg

https://kopitiambot.com/2018/02/21/nasa … used-once/

If the tower bends and leans in the direction you want the rocket to go isn't that a good thing?   And you wouldn't need an elevator to reach the top.   A big forklift might be adequate.    Just askin!   smile smile

#219 Re: Not So Free Chat » Elon Musk's Unbelievably Simple Killer Break Down on Climate Change » 2018-02-18 21:18:27

louis wrote:

Nearly two years ago.

Anything more recent?

Yes.   Will this be enough or would you like more recent science based information?

In fairness let me first present an opposing viewpoint by the leader.

trump-global-warming-tweet.jpg?w=624

News  | January 18, 2018 
Long-term warming trend continued in 2017: NASA, NOAA
From NASA

Earth’s global surface temperatures in 2017 ranked as the second warmest since 1880, according to an analysis by NASA.

Continuing the planet's long-term warming trend, globally averaged temperatures in 2017 were 1.62 degrees Fahrenheit (0.90 degrees Celsius) warmer than the 1951 to 1980 mean, according to scientists at NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New York. That is second only to global temperatures in 2016.

In a separate, independent analysis, scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) concluded that 2017 was the third-warmest year in their record. The minor difference in rankings is due to the different methods used by the two agencies to analyze global temperatures, although over the long-term the agencies’ records remain in strong agreement. Both analyses show that the five warmest years on record all have taken place since 2010.

Because weather station locations and measurement practices change over time, there are uncertainties in the interpretation of specific year-to-year global mean temperature differences. Taking this into account, NASA estimates that 2017’s global mean change is accurate to within 0.1 degree Fahrenheit, with a 95 percent certainty level.

“Despite colder than average temperatures in any one part of the world, temperatures over the planet as a whole continue the rapid warming trend we’ve seen over the last 40 years,” said GISS Director Gavin Schmidt.
The planet’s average surface temperature has risen about 2 degrees Fahrenheit (a little more than 1 degree Celsius) during the last century or so, a change driven largely by increased carbon dioxide and other human-made emissions into the atmosphere. Last year was the third consecutive year in which global temperatures were more than 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit (1 degree Celsius) above late nineteenth-century levels.

Phenomena such as El Niño or La Niña, which warm or cool the upper tropical Pacific Ocean and cause corresponding variations in global wind and weather patterns, contribute to short-term variations in global average temperature. A warming El Niño event was in effect for most of 2015 and the first third of 2016. Even without an El Niño event – and with a La Niña starting in the later months of 2017 – last year’s temperatures ranked between 2015 and 2016 in NASA’s records.

In an analysis where the effects of the recent El Niño and La Niña patterns were statistically removed from the record, 2017 would have been the warmest year on record.

Weather dynamics often affect regional temperatures, so not every region on Earth experienced similar amounts of warming. NOAA found the 2017 annual mean temperature for the contiguous 48 United States was the third warmest on record.

Warming trends are strongest in the Arctic regions, where 2017 saw the continued loss of sea ice.

NASA’s temperature analyses incorporate surface temperature measurements from 6,300 weather stations, ship- and buoy-based observations of sea surface temperatures, and temperature measurements from Antarctic research stations.

These raw measurements are analyzed using an algorithm that considers the varied spacing of temperature stations around the globe and urban heating effects that could skew the conclusions. These calculations produce the global average temperature deviations from the baseline period of 1951 to 1980.

NOAA scientists used much of the same raw temperature data, but with a different baseline period, and different methods to analyze Earth’s polar regions and global temperatures.

The full 2017 surface temperature data set and the complete methodology used to make the temperature calculation are available at:

https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp

GISS is a laboratory within the Earth Sciences Division of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. The laboratory is affiliated with Columbia University’s Earth Institute and School of Engineering and Applied Science in New York.

NASA uses the unique vantage point of space to better understand Earth as an interconnected system. The agency also uses airborne and ground-based monitoring, and develops new ways to observe and study Earth with long-term data records and computer analysis tools to better see how our planet is changing. NASA shares this knowledge with the global community and works with institutions in the United States and around the world that contribute to understanding and protecting our home planet.

https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2671/long … nasa-noaa/

For more information about NASA’s Earth science missions, visit:

https://www.nasa.gov/earth


[Excerpt]

NASA’s longest running survey of ice shattered records in 2017
By Maria-José Viñas,
NASA's Earth Science News Team
February 13, 2018

Last year was a record-breaking one for Operation IceBridge, NASA’s aerial survey of the state of polar ice. For the first time in its nine-year history, the mission, which aims to close the gap between two NASA satellite campaigns that study changes in the height of polar ice, carried out seven field campaigns in the Arctic and Antarctic in a single year. In total, the IceBridge scientists and instruments flew over 214,000 miles, the equivalent of orbiting the Earth 8.6 times at the equator

“A big highlight for 2017 is how we increased our reach with our new bases of operations and additional campaigns,” said Nathan Kurtz, IceBridge’s project scientist and a sea ice researcher at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. “In the Arctic, we flew out of Svalbard for the first time, expanding our coverage of the Eastern Arctic Ocean. And with our two Antarctic aircraft campaigns from Argentina and East Antarctica, we’ve flown over a large area of the Antarctic continent.”

The expanding sets of measurements collected by IceBridge will continue to be invaluable for researchers to advance their understanding of how the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets are contributing to sea level rise and how the changing polar sea ice impacts weather and climate. For example, in 2017, scientists worldwide published studies that had used IceBridge data to look at ways to improve forecasts of sea ice conditions and to use satellites to map the depth of the layer of snow on top of sea ice, a key measurement in determining sea ice volume.

Read the full detailed article at:
https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2681/nasa … s-in-2017/

#220 Not So Free Chat » Elon Musk's Unbelievably Simple Killer Break Down on Climate Change » 2018-02-18 14:27:39

EdwardHeisler
Replies: 2

The basics of climate change.

Elon Musk breaks down climate change for students at The Sorbonne in Paris right before the historic COP21 Climate Change Conference in which 170+ nations signed to reduce carbon emissions below 2C, and preferably under 1.5C.

This is one of the best basic explanations on climate change ever given in a short amount of time. Enjoy!

See the video at:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKCuDxpccYM

#221 Not So Free Chat » World Government Summit 17 Session: A Conversation with Elon Musk » 2018-02-18 14:03:59

EdwardHeisler
Replies: 0

A Conversation with Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla Inc. & Founder of SpaceX moderated by H.E. Mohammad AlGergawi, Minister of Cabinet Affairs & The Future, UAE. Chairman of the World Government Summit

Click to see video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rCoFKUJ_8Yo

#222 Re: Not So Free Chat » Status of DACA under Trump » 2018-02-16 15:27:46

Trump has a "beautiful" wall that he could base his new Trump wall on. The Berlin Wall.   And a new modern Berlin type wall built along the U.S. southern and northern borders could also be used to keep American residents inside the United Sates!

Wall off the whole damn nation from the rest of the world.  And stop those international plane flights!   Nobody in and nobody out of the new USA without a special Trumpian pass.

Seig Heil folks!

#224 Interplanetary transportation » The Incredible Sounds of the Falcon Heavy Launch (BINAURAL AUDIO) » 2018-02-15 11:51:38

EdwardHeisler
Replies: 1

The Incredible Sounds of the Falcon Heavy Launch (BINAURAL AUDIO IMMERSION)

Video and sounds taken at the top of the Vehicle Assembly Building.

IT ONLY WORKS IF YOU USE HEADPHONES TO HEAR THE SOUNDS!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ImoQqNyRL8Y

#225 Re: Not So Free Chat » The Science Jury Is In: Human Activity Is Driving Global Warming » 2018-02-14 16:37:06

News  | January 18, 2018 
Long-term warming trend continued in 2017: NASA, NOAA
From NASA

Earth’s global surface temperatures in 2017 ranked as the second warmest since 1880, according to an analysis by NASA.

Continuing the planet's long-term warming trend, globally averaged temperatures in 2017 were 1.62 degrees Fahrenheit (0.90 degrees Celsius) warmer than the 1951 to 1980 mean, according to scientists at NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) in New York. That is second only to global temperatures in 2016.

In a separate, independent analysis, scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) concluded that 2017 was the third-warmest year in their record. The minor difference in rankings is due to the different methods used by the two agencies to analyze global temperatures, although over the long-term the agencies’ records remain in strong agreement. Both analyses show that the five warmest years on record all have taken place since 2010.

Because weather station locations and measurement practices change over time, there are uncertainties in the interpretation of specific year-to-year global mean temperature differences. Taking this into account, NASA estimates that 2017’s global mean change is accurate to within 0.1 degree Fahrenheit, with a 95 percent certainty level.

“Despite colder than average temperatures in any one part of the world, temperatures over the planet as a whole continue the rapid warming trend we’ve seen over the last 40 years,” said GISS Director Gavin Schmidt.
The planet’s average surface temperature has risen about 2 degrees Fahrenheit (a little more than 1 degree Celsius) during the last century or so, a change driven largely by increased carbon dioxide and other human-made emissions into the atmosphere. Last year was the third consecutive year in which global temperatures were more than 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit (1 degree Celsius) above late nineteenth-century levels.

Phenomena such as El Niño or La Niña, which warm or cool the upper tropical Pacific Ocean and cause corresponding variations in global wind and weather patterns, contribute to short-term variations in global average temperature. A warming El Niño event was in effect for most of 2015 and the first third of 2016. Even without an El Niño event – and with a La Niña starting in the later months of 2017 – last year’s temperatures ranked between 2015 and 2016 in NASA’s records.

In an analysis where the effects of the recent El Niño and La Niña patterns were statistically removed from the record, 2017 would have been the warmest year on record.

Weather dynamics often affect regional temperatures, so not every region on Earth experienced similar amounts of warming. NOAA found the 2017 annual mean temperature for the contiguous 48 United States was the third warmest on record.

Warming trends are strongest in the Arctic regions, where 2017 saw the continued loss of sea ice.

NASA’s temperature analyses incorporate surface temperature measurements from 6,300 weather stations, ship- and buoy-based observations of sea surface temperatures, and temperature measurements from Antarctic research stations.

These raw measurements are analyzed using an algorithm that considers the varied spacing of temperature stations around the globe and urban heating effects that could skew the conclusions. These calculations produce the global average temperature deviations from the baseline period of 1951 to 1980.

NOAA scientists used much of the same raw temperature data, but with a different baseline period, and different methods to analyze Earth’s polar regions and global temperatures.

The full 2017 surface temperature data set and the complete methodology used to make the temperature calculation are available at:

https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp

GISS is a laboratory within the Earth Sciences Division of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. The laboratory is affiliated with Columbia University’s Earth Institute and School of Engineering and Applied Science in New York.

NASA uses the unique vantage point of space to better understand Earth as an interconnected system. The agency also uses airborne and ground-based monitoring, and develops new ways to observe and study Earth with long-term data records and computer analysis tools to better see how our planet is changing. NASA shares this knowledge with the global community and works with institutions in the United States and around the world that contribute to understanding and protecting our home planet.

https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2671/long … nasa-noaa/

For more information about NASA’s Earth science missions, visit:

https://www.nasa.gov/earth

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB