You are not logged in.
Who knows if Maldek had another satellite named Kingu, that was launched towards Earth's orbit after Maldek's destruction, becoming our moon? There are many references of a moon named Kingu, which with Mars, would be the satellites of Maldek or Tiamat.
What about what Zetcharia Sitchin wrote about that?
Interesting, but Kingu, could also have been blown away and is now in the asteroid belt, (there are some small moons in the asteriod belt) no doubt full of ancient artifacts, (well, anything big that clinged on).
Nice one, and odd's on this is or was a structure.
Latest from Art Alien TV:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bykCFiDKEaU
Another v. interesting video with some intriguing artefacts.
Yes, most likely a plant type fern, growing out of a rock, (l would have to study it more to be sure).
Interesting links
Secret Mars Colonies Trade with up to 900 Extraterrestrial Civilizations https://www.exopolitics.org/secret-mars … lizations/
German Secret Societies Colonized Mars in 1940s https://www.exopolitics.org/german-secr … -in-1940s/
Interesting read, and eventhough hard for us to grasp, is certainly possible; or as l have tried to show, an advanced civilization would have mapped out the galaxy and knows where all of the habitable planets are, elsewhere, with the usual pigheadedness, or fear.
But if we had a telescope on several planets and moons with a computer that could handle the data, (we currently don't) or the equivalent size to our solar system, then seeing the Earth, at from the moon distances, and mapping out its atmosphere is more than feasible).
Obviously getting there is another problem, unless moving a craft into the correct dimension is possible then distance is no barrier.
Goode says that such incidents are staged by a “Secret Space Program Alliance” to help prepare Earth’s population for the major disclosures that lie ahead.
Yes, another 13 years and the ones that persist in keeping their heads in the sand, will be run over by a truck, and we will see images of Mars as we do Earth, showing similar landscapes.
That is why they are releasing a trickle now, since the ICC are getting annoyed at our stubborness, (oil profits) but are leaving us to set the date, and no doubt if our leaders keep stuffing them about, then it will be a saucer landing in a park in Washington.
Either way it is inevitable.
The first image in post 1111 looks like a ships sextant to a degree
Yes, but remember that the top part of this is a ref, rock showing the rover and landscape, but the bottom part seriously looks like a sculptured handle adjoining a larger piece of stone, or a hinge to a door, (probably ancient).
And the right hand prickle in the last image, also shows a red flower up the top, (flowers that high up, has to strongly suggest, insects or birds or both).
Or it looks like Mars and Earth, developed life on similar timelines, but Mars got hammered twice, and Earth once.
Hit the jackpot today, and if someone asks me why do l do this the last image covers that,...mind blowing stuff, but first!
This appears to be a sculpture, or the top arrow shows reflective ground showing the rovers wheel and the lanscape on the right of that, but the curved stone and ajoining part, is what is sparking my interest, (not the eye of Horis, Doctor Who, Pyramids of Mars).
THis one right, sun setting and what looks like a plant in the middle. Left image, what looks like a field of plants, (some are the rover, but not all).
Top, left what looks like a field of prickles, right similar with some details up top that are probably not rover related.
Bottom, more and what looks like a plant, with large leaves, or sub-tropical. And bottom/right, a cleaned up version of it, which is definitely a plant, and which also hints at consistent rainful, but since Mars sun is about 20% weaker than ours, and it has a weaker gravity, it makes sence that plant life with big leaves, would occur.
And now for the cool one...
Top/left possibly a flour scoup, but it is the sun setting ref, that is good. And now for the big one, right, a landscape of plants.
But after cleaning it up, below you can see a bright sky, blue hills and prickles on a landscape of dead grass and ground, (dark thing in the foreground is the rovers shadow) or a typical landscape on Earths deserts, except this is on Mars.
It seems that Mars is no different to Earth in many ways, at least for its plant life, etc. NASA says to our face, that Mars is a dead rock, with a near vacumn atmosphere, blah, blah, and the rover is driving through a forest of prickles, with who knows how many birds and insects, unbelievable!
Sol 609
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPL_Mars_Helicopter_Scout
Really need an expert here to determine if a drone could fly in Mars alleged thin atmosphere, (1.8 kg, 1.1m blade span) but on the plus side the drone resolution camera will be far better than the cheap Wallmart camera we have to tolerate on the current 1 billion dollar rover, (ten times better).
But it will be months before they fly it, after landing, and then over a couple of times over its lifespan, so they will cherry pick the best time, and make sure no locals are in the general area, so they don't have to Photoshop their brains out afterwards, for the three measly minutes of flight time, but it at least can take a real selfie of the rover.
One of the weirdest ever Mars images put up again by Art Alien TV:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1xD29C1yf0
It's the "monkey on the mobile phone screen"...
Take a look - there's no way that is a "natural" rock formation.
I tend to agree with Joe, that it is most likely part of an art work.
The background of this ref, rock is showing the sky and blue hills, the monkey is either perforations in the mettle sheet, (part of the rover best guess, since it is ref, the rover close by around it) or another background ref, of the rover from a distance of a few metres.
So the metal sheet that could be martian junk, (l don't remember the rover having a metal sheet on a stick) is probably the only area of interest.
Tmcom wrote:jorgear wrote:This image says everything. Writings on Mars.
Took a closer look and l honesty can't tell.
But since the horizion or sky is visible behind this, l am leaning towards ref, rock.
It is clear that there are writings on that piece. Like the coffin found over there too.
https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-6bKNjrrInmA/ … s-%2B2.jpg
No doubt about the Earth connection, and that many things found on Mars are also on Earth.
Arr, no, the sky and landscape is visible behind it, so part of the rover, or some junk it passed, but l wouldn't say it is hieroglyphs.
This image says everything. Writings on Mars.
Took a closer look and l honesty can't tell.
But since the horizion or sky is visible behind this, l am leaning towards ref, rock.
Tmcom wrote:jorgear wrote:This image says everything. Writings on Mars.
Couldn't really see anything, and the skull is a ref, rock, which does show a pretty cool rain cloud.
The one above is better, and l will take a closer look.
The next rover, is l believe launching next year, and is sure to give us, more blurry, photoshopped images, and ignore a lot of stuff, plants, lakes, etc.
A pity Musk couldn't launch a rover there, and cut the crap finally!
Regrettably, they will continue lying. Maybe another space agency like the Chinese send this year a new spacecraft and reveal all and that might be a good pressure to get NASA to tell the truth.
No, they are all in on it, since full disclose leads to the price of oil collapsing. Musk was going to send a rover to Mars, but his one way trip to Mars fell through.
They are launching the next rover this year, with apparently a drone on top, yeah, a drone it the so called no atmosphere, the herd may think about it, briefly).
Was the arrival of the man to the moon filmed on a stage like that of the photo? It would not surprise me, above all to avoid the appearance of some alien while they broadcasted live from there.
No, the second stage of the LM, are on the moon and verified, as is the LM top stage that the apollo astranauts abandoned on one of their missions and recently found.
But some photos, and video footage was probably buried.
PS that is my favorite movie.
This image says everything. Writings on Mars.
Couldn't really see anything, and the skull is a ref, rock, which does show a pretty cool rain cloud.
The one above is better, and l will take a closer look.
The next rover, is l believe launching next year, and is sure to give us, more blurry, photoshopped images, and ignore a lot of stuff, plants, lakes, etc.
A pity Musk couldn't launch a rover there, and cut the crap finally!
Thanks for your opinions!
And now, according to your point of view... what is this? A mole, animal, something under the surface of Mars? That blue thing seems to be water. Are there aquatic animals? Sure, I think so.
The first photo is taken first, the second photo is taken 15 minutes later.
Studied these up close, and l am pretty sure that they are dust devils, sorry.
Which isn't easy to say after watching half of the BBC, adaptation of H.G.Wells The War of The Worlds, (not bad, but it doesn't resemble the Sound Track version at all, which is a little offputting, but l will persist).
Three big towers on Mars. Each of them are on the same straight line, same distance one another. Their measure is 1,5 km tall. Located in the region Terra Meridiani. Maybe constructed like this similar to the Keops pyramids? Pointing at the three stars of Orion?
http://laguerrademarte.mex.tl/imagesnew … ouTube.png
Nice one, and with pretty slim odd's that this is natural, (with the flat angles, near impossible that this is natural) or pretty solid evidence that Mars does have ancient artifacts on its surface.
The images in your other post didn't show.
Yeah, mad conspiracy, evidence shows the way!
So long as there is a camera, they will slip up and it will be leaked...
Maybe but from what l have seen they are very thorough in burying the truth, but there is always a chance that someone working at JPL, who is on their deathbed or something may leak something?
Merry Christmas everyone!! This next year NASA launches the Mars2020 rover... thousands of millions of dollars spent... I expect for something... mainly to tell the truth at once!
Tell the truth, nope, l expect some minor, (at least for us) announcement, like they drilled down a few metres and discovered that Mars subsurface is warmer or traces of moisture without being saline, or concentrations of methane?
They will ignore drilling through worms and the rain and any tree roots.
Pasteurized, Homogenized charf for the cattle for the most part, with hopefully some big surprizes for us.
It seems that Mars is greening up somewhat; but more on that later.
Saw these impressions in the sand, and on first inspection it looked like the rover drove down this steep decline, but this is pretty steep or toppling the rover over kind of deal, unless the scale is short?
Going by other images, l would say that this is too steep for the rover, (one set of tracks only) and someone or something made these impressions.
Next image may show the who.
Top, left the rover on the right, sun setting and green things sticking up across the landscape, which NASA Never investigates. Top, right one of these green things. Bottom left, what looks like water drops, but is more likely just impressions.
And bottom, right, this is the real mars, sun setting with a storm cloud in the sky, and plant life dottering the landscape. Arrow shows a very strong grass green on the CP tool, but may also show a gray with a shocked look on its face, but this is highly speculative, so it is definitely some plant life, and possibly a gray.
Merry Xmas everyone.
Tmcom wrote:Yes, last image is a 50/50 candidate, but it may be a reflection of the rover, so it is good but no cigar.
And it seems that some cannot handle, plants, NASA lying and the locals having a closer look, which is fine, if they want to stay in denial and get shocked in 13 years time, no probs!
Thanks Tmcom. Even in 13 years when they arrive on Mars they will see all of that and will continue lying.
No they cannot lie indefinitely, so the idea is circle Mars, and land on the moon with the monolith.
The 100 trillion in oil and greedy bastards is what is plugging up the announcement.
Yes, last image is a 50/50 candidate, but it may be a reflection of the rover, so it is good but no cigar.
And it seems that some cannot handle, plants, NASA lying and the locals having a closer look, which is fine, if they want to stay in denial and get shocked in 13 years time, no probs!
Demonstration that NASA lied once again when they said they had taken another photo of the face on Mars that they showed the world as "a simple hill". Putting the faked face over the real face, the proportions are not the same. The new photo does not fit the real face photo taken in 1975. They manipulated the real one with Photoshop. NASA ALWAYS lies.
http://laguerrademarte.mex.tl/imagesnew … ube(1).png
Yep, culpable deniability is their game, or show aliens or plant life on Mars but do it in an, "we can deny the whole thing" kind or way, or insult our intelligence's by saying that anything we see as Earthlike is dissonance association, or seeing common forms and saying the square rock is a brick.
Pretty hard to dismiss water drops on the rover!
But some who cling onto Mars being dead, (since the alien idea scares them to death) will buy anything NASA says or shows, even when it makes no sense.
PS, and the alien l spotted earlier, is probably wearing a T - Shirt with a curvy cross, emblem on the front. College insignia, beats me?
But it is not the rover, and likely not a totem pole, and not some evil aliens ready to slit our throats, we can leave that fear based, childlike though form from here.
Not much today real sunset, local taking a peek, usual.
Mars rover on the left, and the other things on the right, plants, why, CP shows strong green and they are too delicate to be rocks or mineral deposits.
This one a local taking a closer look, impossible to tell if this is real or another totem pole, but if real, female, gray, probably teenager, going by the hairstyle, and smiling, (doesn't look like some evil alien, ready to probe humans).
The day is coming when they will be walking among us, and we won't care, (PS definitely not the rovers camera turrent, going by the glint in her eyes, and other details).
Left the rover and plant details either side.
Last the Mars sun is setting and delivering an Earth like orange/yellow cloud display, the mars rover or greenish thing in the middle l have to admit does show green, becuase of the low light and other factors, but the green plants spotted before also show green, and the landscape inbetween the rover and plants shows blue only, so l need to be more careful with these, but the CP tool is still valid when the rover is isolated.
Any animal on mars surface, I would expect to be dark in color to obsorb the warmth of the sun. Would not think that a large population of them would exist so a solitary captured image is likely. The perspective looks as if its down hill where the mars air would be thicker for an adaptive creature to breath.
Whats up with the foreground being clear and sharp while the background is out of focus or smog filled.
NASA putting the usual dark color over their images to hide anything noteworthy. Or l forget to remove it as usually do.
Found something on the left that looks like s decapitated dinosaur, but on closer inspection, it is reflecting the landscape back to us, or a green landscape, with the sun and maybe a rain cloud, but no animal.
Had a re-look at my video again, with most of my images of rats being open to tossing a coin, but one stands out as being legit.
The martian rabbit one, or this is distinctive, has a shadow, so it isn't a ref, rock, is in one image but not others, or moves position, and seems to have baby ones and later on is hiding from the rover, when she realizes, that the rover moves about, (this was one of the previous rovers in the crater were it landed).
Or l did a detailed study, some time ago, so since it is highly likely that Mars has rabbits, then it is sure to have other predictors, like foxes or dogs, (which explains the small animal prints l have occasionally found).
The rabbit or hare, has a similar color to our Earth ones with a orange belly or orange fur, but no dark colorization or anything else apart from big ears, (most likely to hear for predatory animals closeby).
And it doesn't have excessive fur to guard against -200 at night, which is clearly a lie, as is 97% CO2, (its body isn't distorted to accommodate huge lungs, etc).
Just an ordinary rabbit on another planet, who got to close to the rover.
"I can break that animal illusion down if you want, but going by my years of experience it is an illusion."
hey TM, please do and btw, you know we are on the same side right?
ok before you do, you do have a pair of red/cyan glasses right?
I don't even waste my time in 2D anymore. if you want to REALLY "see" Mars, one must "see" in depth of field otherwise you're only educating the brain with one eye closed!
the faux creature standing there is not a living being IMO but only a facsimile of one. And I too have now chalked up well over 15 years of image analysis.
trust me, brother, invest in a pair. Here ya go;
https://www.amazon.com/Red-Blue-Anaglyp … 216&sr=8-6
Ok, sorry, here is the first one again.
The face is also shown further down, or it is part of the rover, and not a face, and the next image down, shows the sun setting inbetween mountains, (same detail shown in the creatures neck.
So if it is a Buffalo it is a very reflective one.
Last the rovers shadow, or some parts are blurry and others sharp, and the middle one is showing part of the landscape, all signs of a shadow and not dark features of an animal.
I pushed the contrast on the right to emphasis this.
So no buffalo roaming.
Another Buffalo, nope, or part of the landscape or hill is showing through this buffalo, so if this is one, he is partially invisible.
And going by the face, l would say that he is a lion if anything, but it is an illusion. I still get excited when l come across stuff like this, then quickly realize it isn't what l want it to be.
Got to be careful in this game.
I did mess about with 3D glasses, but couldn't be fussed, although some of the stuff l found might be worth further analysis.
Although the reflective rocks showing landscapes probably wouldn't show as 3D?
Tmcom wrote:jorgear wrote:Thanks for your in depth explanation Tmcom.
Is this a giant rat on Mars???
No, (you can see the ref, landscape on the left) but my video, (first post here) shows some rats and one rabbit. The rabbit one is fascinating as it doesn't appear in some images and in others.
M-Albion-3D wrote:Spirit Rover Sol 87
On Sol 87, the Spirit Rover sent back to earth some remarkable images. These raw image files were acquired from NASA https://mars.nasa.gov/mer/gallery/all/2 … 3L0M1.HTML
Is this a huge animal mozying across the Martian plain, or could it be something else? Perhaps just a giant Martian scarecrow?
Using the available two stereo files, I was able to forge this excellent 3D image for evaluation,
Below is the 3D image from the raw stereo images gathered from the two Navcam cameras mounted up high. They are taken at roughly ground level.
In an effort to try and get a better 3D effect for close up the magnification, in the image below, you may need to pull back and forth until you get a nice sense of the depth of field.
The lower is forged for viewing at close range.
So the question now is, what is it? One thing I did notice was that the "BLC" (Bear Like Creature) did not move in the frames as first suspected and will show the evidence a little later.
Upon close inspection in anaglyph, I noticed the BLC was sporting a sort of garment with a collar and even round buttons!
For all intents and purposes (literally), I believe the "statue" is intended to be a representation of a familiar earthlike creature although.....quite alien!
Stunning!
Saw this years ago, it is a reflection, (shadow is the dark bit, etc).
PS don't post the rodent one, another one.
Oh, I'm used to this kind of dismissal guy. No, it's not a shadow my friend but if you think it is....well... I would like to show you a cool bridge at a price $ you might like to take a look at?
That makes two of us, and l am the first to want to say that it is an animal, but it isn't, the dark part is the rovers shadow, it is as simple as that!
I have been scouring through Curiosity images for the last 6 years, (l have tried to put this thread on several other forums) and am a lot more critical than the YT crowd that find something flimsy and spend half an hour on it, or l am a lot more critical than l was 6 years ago, where anything was something.
I can break that animal illusion down if you want, but going by my years of experience it is an illusion.
I also spent a few years with Opp/Spirit before Curiosity, so l guess l have been at this for almost 10 years.
Have a nice day!
The king of Mars carved on a rock https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jidoi1qCOaQ
I don't believe it is anything, apart from ancient lava or melted metal of some kind.
Today we have plants and water drops, one on the ground which is rare, especially on fast absorbing dirt.
THis is probably the rover, (didn't notice the reflection).
But this isn't,..top two have water drops on these flat rocks, (impressions are higher up and look nothing like these), middle one shows an overcast sky, left of this what appears to be the rover driving inbetween two lines of plants, (probably isn't).
And the bottom one, three plants or bushes, CP shows strong green, and the right hand one, had little grass green. Rover is far left.
Or pretty ironic that NASA drives right past a plant and keeps bleating that Mars is dead.
Same thing, blue sky, dark blue mountain and a landscape of plants or prickles.
Top, left,...two plants, with the one on the right, closely resembling an Earth like prickle.
Bottom, l distortion corrected this one, since the rock was rectangular, but same thing, green on the ground, blue mountains, and dark gray clouds, which according to NASA are impossible.
This area had rain, recently, and the landscape is covered with plants, and NASA are fibbing their brains out.