You are not logged in.
Tmcom wrote:Been seeing this video just released by NASA, (well it has been pulled by NASA on TY, or maybe it wasn't posted) but either way l can only find this dodgy YT video and not one from Youtube.
https://www.express.co.uk/videos/613494 … ce-station
So if anyone finds the original please post the link here, so l can take screen images and we can all get a close look at what is very likely a legit, alien craft, (space junk doesn't fly up away from the earth by itself eventhough dimwits say so).
Or it is a lot harder to do with this video, that won't allow a part Laptop view instead of full screen only.
I will post it in the correct section and put a link in here, unless there is little to see then l may put it here, but l suspect that we will see a lot, and l will need to post a Apollo UFO type analysis to get all of the juicy goodies from it.
Maybe the video of that alien spacecraft is here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2eIcSs … =emb_title
Thanks Jorgear, already found it, l will run an analysis when possible, but so far l am leaning towards it being a test run of something NASA is messing with, since it departs earth slowly.
So probably not as good as the legit UFO Apollo footage, but still worth looking into.
Been seeing this video just released by NASA, (well it has been pulled by NASA on TY, or maybe it wasn't posted) but either way l can only find this dodgy YT video and not one from Youtube.
https://www.express.co.uk/videos/613494 … ce-station
So if anyone finds the original please post the link here, so l can take screen images and we can all get a close look at what is very likely a legit, alien craft, (space junk doesn't fly up away from the earth by itself eventhough dimwits say so).
Or it is a lot harder to do with this video, that won't allow a part Laptop view instead of full screen only.
I will post it in the correct section and put a link in here, unless there is little to see then l may put it here, but l suspect that we will see a lot, and l will need to post a Apollo UFO type analysis to get all of the juicy goodies from it.
Another interesting video from Joe White, this time about construction materials:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLJobh40Ikk
As always he is very thorough...
A convincing presentation I think.
Ok, he may be on to something with the concrete idea, and there are rivers on mars!
Another ref, rock today.
Showing the rover, (dark bits in the foreground) and a flat area, (probably a dry river) and a hill with distinctive green areas, which the CP shows as strong green or in other words, bushes!
Bushes usually means, bugs, insects birds and small rodents, like the rabbit l found when the rover landed years ago.
Rover in the middle on a hill with its mast cam looking straight at us, (which is a given or it could not take the pic) with some weird things on the right and left.
Left looks like buildings and a car perhaps, and right, some white perishope type structures, which l would like to pass off as the rover, but these things are dotting the landscape, so some alien tech, probably letterboxes.
SpaceNut wrote:The other mars just on earth...
http://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tena … 60&o=t&l=f
with the bottom of a crater possibly looking like this
http://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tena … 60&o=t&l=f
minus the road of course...
I am sure there are roads on Mars, and railways.
Also the far west was possible, maybe were there Martian indians too?
When l remote viewed it, where were roads, but they use triangle rainbow reflector witches in the middle.
The other mars just on earth...
http://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tena … 60&o=t&l=f
with the bottom of a crater possibly looking like this
http://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tena … 60&o=t&l=f
minus the road of course...
Yes, love the top image, or what we will be seeing after the year 2033.
Latest from Art Alien TV...very convincing skull find (particularly the dome of the skull).
The top part is also reflecting the sky and sun, so l wouldn't get your hopes up.
But back to work...
Found this today, which is most likely a communications tower. Impossible to say if it is ours or theirs, since l cannot make out any details on the scaffolding or maybe clear Martian framework.
Or if it is ours it wold be crisscrossing aluminum, and theirs probably a white sculpture or clear cylinder.
Odd's on one of the US rovers would land near a US base, so they could clean the lenses and take happy snaps, etc.
And Mars magnetic field is stronger than Earths in some places, (NASA squealed that recently) with the strongest bubbles being up the top where l have found the largest concentrations of Green, and the lake systems, (ESA previous image).
But l need to give the kiddie version when discussing this elsewhere.
I love the panarama in post 1164 but my crappy computer just does not behave well enough to pan around its full scene. It looks like we have some brown grass in places at the top of it. Lots of interesting cracked and fragmented rocks...
Yes, been trying to convince myself that the white bush is dust, or the others, but cannot, or it just does not fit. So dead or near dead bushes on Mars, and the rover drives right over them, (which is good since the remaining 1000 odd Sols left, may show s branch or part of these, stuck on the rover, (still live in hope that l will find an insect or feather on the rover).
Interesting finds. I don't think I've seen the last one - "bearded man" - before. Perhaps you should send it to Joe White at Art Alien TV. He has a contact e mail on his website. He might be interested in doing a video on that and always credits his sources.
You are quite welcome Louis, l tried someone like that in the past and he didn't get back to me, or l have left comments on TY video's like that hinting at what l have found here.
Seems that they want to find their own stuff, and ignore plodders like me that won't post anything until l actually find something?
And speaking as such, these are from Sal, 610, and already found this, (well after scouring through 10 images, and downloading them all).
Left image, sun setting, nice orange/yellow sunset, and the rover in the middle. And as the CP shows, strong green on the bushes, then the blue hills and sky.
Ok, ran through the panorama, and found some interesting stuff, but not related to previous discussions.
http://www.gigapan.com/gigapans/219352/ … XwWiRdMjoQ
Sorry can't really mark this image.
And NASA is still putting its filter over this, but not as much as previously.
First, the sun is setting, over a landscape of burnt or near dead, bushes and prickles.
Next onse down, could be a bird.
Next burnt green landscape.
Next more dead or near dead plants.
And last, this has to be a dead bush!
PS and the one with two different rocks fused together.
No I'm not. I'm referring to the main subject of the video:a reptilian type skull, complete with teeth, and a second more humanoid skull which also has teeth. Obviously I maintain an open mind - this could be a remarkable coincidence - but both artefacts are among the most convincing finds in the "skull" category.
Dusty rocks definitely don't reflect light in the way you suggest.
Tmcom wrote:louis wrote:We know Joe White is good...but this time he's really excelled himself...one of the best ever skulls discovered on Mars:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0akWv2DT_kQ
Of course we can't be absolutely sure it's a skull. But the repitilian skull has incredible detail.
Not far behind is the other more humanoid skull.
Both have teeth detail, which is one of the first things archaeologists look for to distinguish remains from rocks and earth.
Will we hear any comment from NASA on this?
In a way I hope we don't. As much as it could accelerate the exploration of Mars it might give the "Keep Off the Mars" crowd more reason to prevent human settlement, arguing we need to proceed very slowly with extreme caution, so as not to destroy any flora and fauna that might exist.
If you are referring to the lion one, the mouth is the edge of the rover, and the eye is the rover from a distance, so a rock really, but it does have some distant plants, so a pity he didn't discuss those.
Had a quick look, and the image is remarkable in that it is high res, and in true color, (NASA no doubt will carry on about false color).
I will take a closer look when l can, but on a quick scan, l may not find anything.
And l once found even Martian sand can reflect the rover back to us!
And on the subject of vegetation, here is some more.
Top/left shows the fallen one, l spotted before, and the lower one, after cleaning it up as much as is possible, shows a few things.
There are plenty of things here between the rover and mountains that shouldn't be here, and all showing strong green, (some may be clouds, but some are not) and the one with the arrow, looks like a tall, furry white cactus.
And the mountains only show blue, (CP) and the rover has no green on its surface.
louis wrote:We know Joe White is good...but this time he's really excelled himself...one of the best ever skulls discovered on Mars:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0akWv2DT_kQ
Of course we can't be absolutely sure it's a skull. But the repitilian skull has incredible detail.
Not far behind is the other more humanoid skull.
Both have teeth detail, which is one of the first things archaeologists look for to distinguish remains from rocks and earth.
Will we hear any comment from NASA on this?
In a way I hope we don't. As much as it could accelerate the exploration of Mars it might give the "Keep Off the Mars" crowd more reason to prevent human settlement, arguing we need to proceed very slowly with extreme caution, so as not to destroy any flora and fauna that might exist.
They look like basalt rocks to me. One of them is vaguely skull shaped. The human brain is keyed to recognise faces and patterns. We tend to see facial features in things like rocks and clouds, where none really exist.
The key questions for any animal life on Mars today, are: what does it eat? What does it drink? What could it be breathing? There are clearly no areas of vegetation. Surface water is possible in the form of mud, but it would need to be highly saline. Oxygen concentrations are too low for lungs to make use of. It is not out of the question that some of these photographs may pick up fossils of things that are long dead. But these look like weak candidates.
I was with you until you mentioned "no vegetation" or l suggest starting at the first post and making your way back here.
We know Joe White is good...but this time he's really excelled himself...one of the best ever skulls discovered on Mars:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0akWv2DT_kQ
Of course we can't be absolutely sure it's a skull. But the repitilian skull has incredible detail.
Not far behind is the other more humanoid skull.
Both have teeth detail, which is one of the first things archaeologists look for to distinguish remains from rocks and earth.
Will we hear any comment from NASA on this?
In a way I hope we don't. As much as it could accelerate the exploration of Mars it might give the "Keep Off the Mars" crowd more reason to prevent human settlement, arguing we need to proceed very slowly with extreme caution, so as not to destroy any flora and fauna that might exist.
If you are referring to the lion one, the mouth is the edge of the rover, and the eye is the rover from a distance, so a rock really, but it does have some distant plants, so a pity he didn't discuss those.
An abandoned car on Mars? This guy has too much imagination https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4CY5pm4OxXU
Agreed, if they didn't spend so much time doing a video and more time putting in the hard work, they could do a video on something legit.
And the first post #1149, does show another inquisitive gray taking a look at the rover, (young or teenager age, going by his head), or he can be seen easily up the top above the artifact, and more crudely on the left of that.
This image is so good, l will give it a very likely mark, but funny that we get plenty of grays, but never humanoids or the Reptilian ones?
Seems that some races prefer or can live above ground.
Yes, in some pictures appear birds in the sky. Insects, of course, even under the surface. And much more. And at least 5 races of humanoids living in the center of the planet underground. Those are the remains of that ancient civilization of the past.
And some are living on the surface. But today it is another artifact and some sub-tropical plant life.
I cannot be sure this is showing a face with lacework, on the left, but the right is showing a steel square rod, with some pattern protruding out from it, most likely part of a building that got blown apart when the shockwave hit.
And lower more plants, but this is pretty poor, much better is to follow.
These things are not the rover and according to NASA are impossible! But you can see the sky, blue hills and a prickle on the right, and more of a plant on the left, (these are shown in other rocks, to a lesser quality, so are also not an anomaly on this rock).
Lower one, sun setting, clouds that could be rainbearing, and a landscape of green things, (plants).
And now my favorite.
Plants again, with what looks like a palm leaf on the right, (which is why l am leaning towards sub-tropical) a plant in the middle that is hard to make out, but it is tall, and also notice these things sticking up alone the hill-line, or the landscape is overrun with plant life.
The rover is probably driving around California desert type giant prickles on Mars, and then giving a press release bleating on about how the next billion dollar rover may find something, unbelievable!
Sorry more Martian plants today, but we get a pretty good look at the scraggly, bushes this time.
Top the sky, either a hill or cloud then some plants, with one bend over, but the CP shows grass green so, strong winds most likely.
The one below is more interesting or this rock, or tree stump, has these things growing out all over, almost like rampant moss; but either way you don't get strong growing moss, on a world without rain, or an atmosphere for that matter.
This one we get a half decent look at the ground or the bush type plants there, with dark areas the bush or shadows and plants growing out from that, (most likely smaller versions of the tall prickles we have seen).
Pretty much a sure thing that Mars has small rodents, insects and birds.
There must be a source of underground heat to allow for the area to still be able to sustain plant growth
They look like scraggly bushes to me, (especially when no height is shown) and as such are probably similar to Iceland type plant life.
NASA is saying Mars is dead, and indirectly keeps showing that it isn't, (sometimes directly) which l find pretty funny.
More plants today!
Top, what looks like plants, but unfortunately the CP could not find any green?
But the middle ones are plants, or the rover does not have green on its self anywhere, (apart from the color chart, maybe).
And the lower ones, martian tree's; Right hand, tall prickle, left what looks like a pine tree.
Or in other words forests on Mars!
Many Youtube researchers on Mars recognize that NASA is going to reveal microbial life this year. Let's see.... this year four spacecrafts off to Mars.!
But they will never have courage to recognize 3 meter tall beings there...
Don't count on it, best we will get is traces of Methane, while avoiding the grass and prickles, and rain and the occasional nosy local.
Just a rock with an eye where an eye would be in relation to a snout and teeth which would be where you expect them in relation to a snout...and what looks like an arm.
An airy dismissal doesn't count. I think the least you could do is find a rock on Earth that looks like a bear.
I would say that is a very unusual arrangement for a rock, and very unusual surface appearance for a rock.
I don't say it's a "bear" or even a creature but I do say I've seen nothing like that on Earth - unless it's a petrified animal or a part-fossil.
Tmcom wrote:jorgear wrote:Is this a bear?? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2OntoEIb2UU
No, just a rock.
A pity these people put so much effort into a video with commentary, when if they methodically did a search through the images, they would eventually find something which is a lot more interesting.
Ok.
Red arrow, sky, green the line between the sky and ground, and bottom arrow, where the rover is reflecting its shadow, (l used the stamp tool on the second to more clearly show this).
As l previously said if this guy searched through the images for years on end, and was talking about a field of prickles, then l would be raving about him, but he doesn't!
Tmcom wrote:Ok, took a closer look, and found a lot more.
https://i.imgur.com/pSeF4Kv.jpg
Or top, found what he found, then some more in other craters, one look like either runoff or an entrance.
But it is the middle, one that are cool, since it looks like a large building on supports.
And the lower one,which may be a depiction of a gray, surrounded by mushrooms, with a wooden fence on the left, and a few more grays here and there, (could be more, but l am getting over a flu).
Mining or cultivating martian mushrooms?
Regrettably, photo in black and white and a little blurred. Everything you tell is possible.
True, but l am standing by the building being legit, (light is bouncing off a curved shell surface, etc,).
Is this a bear?? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2OntoEIb2UU
No, just a rock.
A pity these people put so much effort into a video with commentary, when if they methodically did a search throw the images, they would eventually find something which is a lot more interesting.
Ok, took a closer look, and found a lot more.
Or top, found what he found, then some more in other craters, one look like either runoff or an entrance.
But it is the middle, one that are cool, since it looks like a large building on supports.
And the lower one,which may be a depiction of a gray, surrounded by mushrooms, with a wooden fence on the left, and a few more grays here and there, (could be more, but l am getting over a flu).
Mining or cultivating martian mushrooms?
Speaking on Ceres in my previous post, here you can see an alien base on that planetoid https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=utUEpMv … e=youtu.be
Yes, there are some structures in the crater, but the gun,lol, no.