New Mars Forums

Official discussion forum of The Mars Society and MarsNews.com

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Announcement: This forum is accepting new registrations via email. Please see Recruiting Topic for additional information. Write newmarsmember[at_symbol]gmail.com.

#102 Re: Human missions » Russia can send Man to Mars by 2014:official - at one-tenth the NASA budget » 2004-02-18 07:47:47

It could be -  it says that it needed to be carried in the payload bay of the Buran shuttle though?

#103 Re: Science, Technology, and Astronomy » Two Questions Please » 2004-02-17 16:27:16

the handiest converter i use is [http://www.google.com]GOOGLE

Just type what you want to know, straight into the search box, and it converts it for you.


try [http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&ie … in+F&meta=]3C in F - For 3 degrees centigrade in Fahrenheit
or [http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&ie … nnes&meta=]15lb in tonnes
or [http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&ie … +KeV&meta=]19.7J in KeV
or [http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&ie … +BTU&meta=]45Kg in BTU
or [http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&ie … tres&meta=]15 cups in litres?!?!?!?!?!?!

Its actually quite fun! What will those people at google think of next?!?!  :laugh:

EDIT

That BTU in Kg one really confuses me!  ???

#104 Re: Science, Technology, and Astronomy » Russia developing space vessel  for 6 - Official » 2004-02-17 16:20:12

Theyre planning on usuing an unmanned soyuz-2 (upgrade) from Kourou -  apparently theyd need to convert to much of the existing soyuz to adapt it for emergency ditching into the atlantic.

The new 6 man craft will use a new launcher in the 12-14 ton range, as far as i know.

#107 Re: Civilization and Culture » Selling property in space - should it be allowed?? » 2004-02-03 10:05:41

Im claiming ownership of all interplanetary space in the solar system.

From now on all probes and missions will need to pay my tolls to pass through my space. In fact the planets as they move through the solar system will also be charged, and the moon too!

MUAHAHAHAHA

#108 Re: Human missions » Japanese manned space program - Japan to change space policy........ » 2004-01-29 16:09:24

[=http://www.spacedaily.com/2004/040129111233.wbuuusqw.html]Interesting......

I wonder if they mean it? Especially considering the poor track record of their H2-A

EDIT:

Forgot to include link  :laugh:

#109 Re: Martian Politics and Economy » Constitutional Amendment - The Management of Martian Civilizations » 2004-01-26 06:51:58

Cobra:

To believe that large numbers of humans can live anywhere longterm without fighting is to ignore basic human nature and all of our history. It is unsubstantiated fantasy.

Europeans spent over a thousand years killing each other in ever more complex ways, infact we were still at it until 50 years ago. Yet to consider war within europe today is frankly impossible. Are we in europe ignoring our basic human nature? Is the peace in Europe unsubstantiated fantasy? Let me put it another way; Does New Jersey have anthing to fear from New York State?  ???

#110 Re: Unmanned probes » View from Mars Express » 2003-12-19 09:06:10

the hyperlink goes to the pic of the day. If you want to see the pic from the 18th then you need to go into the archive.

#111 Re: Martian Politics and Economy » Crime and Punishment - Speculation » 2003-11-26 05:09:19

What if criminals were merely monitored 24/7, and wore some sort of identifier that allows people to discern them as criminals?

The Star of David perhaps?...... ???

#112 Re: Human missions » Proton Mars - The 2 Billion Dollar Manned Mars Mission » 2003-11-26 05:05:27

As for countering 0-g, my idea is that if the capsule is at least about ten feet in diameter, just spin the whole thing up to about 20 rpm (Or whatever is needed) during the rest phases. This would provide seven hours a day of bone building gravity, and if one g isn't enough for healthy astronauts, then bring it up to 1.5 or even 2, although I think 1.2 would be plenty. You really only need this much exposure to gravity a day, and spining something like that while people are walking around would give you vertigo, so just keep the freedom of 0-g while everyone's awake.

The artificial g has to be 'on' when people are up and moving around in order to load the bones and muscles.

When people rest they lie down, their bones are not loaded and their muscles are not being used, as such the artificial g during their sleep would be ineffective, and as you stated it wouldnt be feasible when they were awake.

Also, i havent read the plan, but did you take into account the fuel necessary to 'spin up' and then 'spin down' the capsule over 180 times en-route to mars?

#113 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Exploding Antimatter Bombs against the back of an orion » 2003-09-17 15:11:40

At the moment, we can't produce much antimatter or store it very well although we theoretically know how to do both. Initially i would imagine that antimatter would be used as an ignition source for fusion or maybe even plasma engines, only once we can properly produce and store large ammounts of the stuff can it be used for propulsion.

For a pure anti-matter powered space craft? If we have something of a reneissance in space travel and fast expansion out into the solar system, you might see governments showing off their new bad-boys in about 100 years.

#114 Re: Human missions » Proton Mars - The 2 Billion Dollar Manned Mars Mission » 2003-09-17 12:01:34

The Soyuz/Progess tether practice idea won't fly because no areospace company will make any money doing it. Or maybe I am just too cynical?

It would be a scientific experiment, notthing to do with any of the big aerospace companies.

Also i believe one of the recent soyuz or progress crafts conducted some experiments in orbit before returning or burning up, so the idea is not without precedent.

#115 Re: Meta New Mars » Recent Downtime » 2003-09-17 10:01:42

clarke,I tried both websites and failed.What they are about?

Lol!

Cheers Adrian

#116 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Exploding Antimatter Bombs against the back of an orion » 2003-09-16 21:14:25

Yes, its the very best we can do with our current knowledge of physics.

#117 Re: Human missions » Orbital Space Plane by 2008 - Faster, Cheaper, Better? » 2003-09-16 20:53:47

ISS is the only and as such most practical platfrom for conducting the experiments that need to be done. We can bitch about it as much as we like, and we'd be right too, but its there, and it'll get the job done, eventually.

Anyway, the real reason im posting, i just read this article. So depresing; if this is true then im just gonna curl up into a ball and give up on NASA all together......

Space shuttles to last into next decade - Boeing


"There is not right now on the drawing board one vehicle that can replace what the shuttle can do,"

Have they learnt NOTHING!


Since the International Space Station was designed to work with the space shuttle and to stay in service until at least 2018, the shuttle should probably stay in service until that date, Mott said.

"So if you go to 2018 that becomes very logical because that (the shuttle and the space station) works together as an integrated system," Mott said

*Curles up into a ball*  <sigh> sad

#118 Re: Human missions » Phobos, Deimos, orbital infrastructure - Mars orbital projects (pre-landing) » 2003-09-16 17:38:33

I was thinkinga bout this the other day. A company could make money by sending a comms satelite to mars capable of high-bandwidth data transfer with earth. That company could make a fortune selling its bandwidth to the various entities that will be sending a dirth of probes (and hopefully eventually manned missions  :;): )to mars over the next 2 decades.

Most probable method would be via laser, i believ there is an experiment being conducted at the moment which is testing out this very concept.

#119 Re: Science, Technology, and Astronomy » The Earth's magnetic field - The Earth's magnetic field » 2003-09-16 13:58:11

Geothermal energy requires time and infrastucture, and whilst it would make a good colony or outpost power source, it will require to much work and effort for a  temporary expedition to construct.

#120 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Exploding Antimatter Bombs against the back of an orion » 2003-09-16 13:47:11

An anti-matter driven starship wouldnt use the orion-ship configuration.

The engine would resemble a normal rocket but with a magnetic nozel and tanks, basically the last step in the line after ion, plasma/fission and then fusion(maybe with anti-matter ignition). Itll be the best 'rocketry' could do for us, and will represent the ultimate means by which we can tool round the solar system, but we will need something else (i.e a fuel-less engine) to take us to the stars.

#121 Re: Human missions » Orbital Space Plane by 2008 - Faster, Cheaper, Better? » 2003-09-16 13:39:41

PUBMED refers only to medical experiments.  Whilts i agree with you in this specific area the materials science conducted on the ISS cant readily be done by automated satelites and really requires hands on scientists to be there. Im sure there are plenty of scientists working in a range of fields who would say the same.

There are experiments, in a range of fields, that do need to be conducted by scientists. That said, the ISS is not turning out to be the most cost effective way of doing them.

#122 Re: Not So Free Chat » Apropos of Nothing » 2003-09-15 20:10:10

<------- Look! Ive got an Avatar, ive never had one before  cool

Im gonna sit here and stare at it for a while, just in case it does something cool and avatarish!  tongue

#123 Re: Meta New Mars » Recent Downtime » 2003-09-14 21:47:43

.........seriously........  :angry:  :angry:  :angry:  :angry:  :angry:

#124 Re: Human missions » Orbital Space Plane by 2008 - Faster, Cheaper, Better? » 2003-09-12 18:13:04

The OSP will have a small cargo carrying capability capable of taking experiments up and down. Also the ATV and HTV will boost the ISSs orbit whilst docked.

#125 Re: Human missions » The drive for Space - ways to increase public support » 2003-09-11 12:09:42

Spiderman, youre being extremely short sighted. We all want to go to mars, but its not the only goal out there, even if the astronauts dont travel to mars in zero-g there will be plenty of missions where they will!

As far as microgravity experiments, if you bothered to read what theyre actually doing you'd realise that its important on going research that can only be done in microgravity.

I do agree with you that mutiple mini stations would be better, different experiments are suited to different orbits, they should be permanent though because there is always on going research to be done. As for the ISS, its there, so we should use it. Mothballing it would give completely the wrong signal and would not free up any money for anything.

Theres more than just mars out there, if we concentrate on just mars then once were finished we wont have the ability or momentum to keep going or do anything else, it'd be apollo all over again.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB