You are not logged in.
Back to Oil wars, in case some may misunderstand. What I am against is the cross feed between nations who sell Oil as their one economic trick, and people in western nations who profit from it.
I believe that this arrangement is taking the freedom away from both types of nation, and I want some kind of an end to this.
I don't mind if Oil nations are prosperous, I just don't want them having a chokehold on our nation, and I very much dislike the cultural perversions that are happening to the west when power brokers overseas are more important to governing entities here than the local people are. Because of oil, we have people of power in this nation who should not be.
And then on top of that, if we can come up with some new energy methods, I think that it may ultimately lead to a higher standard of living instead of a lower standard of living, and we hope satisfy the greens enough.
The greens can never be totally satisfied, because to some of them are just plain nutty. Also we have bean counters who are always trying to breed a new breed of horse that needs no food.
Never mind that we are not their horses. (They have problems understanding that).
I have had fertilizer inserted into my mind by the kids on this topic:
http://www.newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=7251
I don't want to interrupt their though flows. Really enjoying their work, but I feel mischievous,
So I will do a trial balloon for what popped into my head from their work here, since it is also perhaps an extension of what was previously posted here.
I am thinking liquid air and geothermal.
Specifically, while I do appreciate windmills with electric generators where the electricity is then used to create liquid air, I also would much prefer as I have said a windmill that squirts liquid air. That is, it has the method to radiate heat from it's blades, and to make liquid air from the energy that the wind provides using mechanical forces.
A cute trick from that is to manufacture an Oxygen beneficiated gas to combust fuels in power plants. This way much less energy is going up the smoke stack to heat Nitrogen. However, that is not my pet project.
I am wondering if we might inject liquid air into "VOIDS" in the Earth, to harvest geothermal energy. (Atributions to Antius for Mars).
Of course if not done correctly there will be permafrost blockages created. A wet environment will freeze up unless the geothermal is very hot.
I am wondering about old fracked oil wells for one. If I understand, they are supposed to be below the water table.
And salt domes. I do know that they can have brine in them, so that could freeze. Could you create a big cave by pumping out the brine and the fill the thing with liquid air?
The point is, then this is a possible way to level out the energy output of windmills, and to also involve the harvesting of geothermal heat.
Something like this might be mentioned for Mars as well, but no wind mills, and I think it is actually and Antius idea. Mars does Maybe have salt domes though I might mention Antius.
http://www.cprm.gov.br/33IGC/1339154.html
Alright for Mars, the solution could be.
Brine of salt and water. When cold it likely can dissolve much more CO2 than when warm. Therefore cool it to almost freezing, saturate it with CO2, and inject it into a salt dome.
The Geothermal warms it up, and CO2 comes out of solution and you have pressurized CO2 coming out of your well. Maybe this could work?
When is the last time a "Russian" type person came to the USA, and shot up a bunch of innocent people?
So, right off the start, they are way better than those creeps you mentioned.
I will make the point that if you had a car with a steam engine which ran on powdered metals, and used liquid air for it's steam, it would preheat off of the air that the car was traveling through. It would also provide air conditioning, and since you would have a combustion engine, you would also have a heater in the car as well.
Again, Merry Christmas!
Well, for me it's been a good Christmas, already!
1) First there is this:
http://phys.org/news/2015-12-metal-powd … fuels.html
Study points to metal powders as potential replacement for fossil fuels

Metal powders, produced using clean primary energy sources, could provide a more viable long-term replacement for fossil fuels than other widely discussed alternatives, such as hydrogen, biofuels or batteries, according to a study in the Dec. 15 issue of the journal Applied Energy.
"Technologies to generate clean electricity - primarily solar and wind power - are being developed rapidly; but we can't use that electricity for many of the things that oil and gas are used for today, such as transportation and global energy trade," notes McGill University professor Jeffrey Bergthorson, lead author of the new study.
2) Then I though, I would like to make liquid air with a windmill, and use that at the "Steam" for such an engine. So, I searched the internet about it and got another present!
http://spectrum.ieee.org/energywise/ene … gy-storage
http://www.hydrolance.net/LiquidAirWind … oLance.htm
While they are all good, my preference will be that eventually perhaps the windmill will use it's blades to radiate heat, and that electricity will not be involved, except for it's control mechanisms. No electric generator, a liquid air generator. But for now the above will serve nicely, thank's Santa.
3) We already know that we can have one of these: (Solar power tower)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_power_tower![]()
And we could superheat Hydrogen or Natural gas with it.
Certainly superheated Natural gas might be able to reduce the iron powder back to usefulness for powering a car.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_reduced_iron
Obviously the people that are working on item #1 have something in mind.
So if you are using natural gas, there will be some CO2 produced in the process, but going back to this,
4) http://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/OP … -Boom.html
That can be pushed in to an old oil field to bring it back to life.
So, the whole process can be almost Zero Carbon. (Of course it also allows oil to be extracted, but that is not a direct part of the process). Therefore, we can have an alliance with the most stringent environmentalists (Not the tin foil ones), And we can cut the sugar to the people on the planet who like to attack us, and have a nice life.
So, absolutely fabulous!
Merry Christmas!
Very good to have.
Those presentations certainly are a good sell.
The current oil situation is not ideal for Russia, but they do much better than some others.
How would you like your stake done?
knightdepax,
Very informative post. Without in the least wanting to correct or divert from what you have presented,
http://phys.org/news/2015-12-metal-powd … fuels.html
Now first, let me humble myself. I did not notice until now that you mentioned that the engine does not have to be internal. May I suggest Magnesium?
And because I have very ulterior motives, may I suggest that the working fluid be some Cryogenic Martian or Earth
Gas?
Of course on Earth we want Iron perhaps instead, and as a working fluid perhaps liquid air?
Imagine that also robots working in the fields squirting weeds with liquid air to kill them.
The method then allows such an air or Nitrogen powered steam engine to power from the air's heat against the stored cold of the Cryogenic fluid, and also the potential of a metal combustion, and then even solar effects.
Can we have a car like that?
Fine information. So, what the soil needs, it can get.
And we can consider air to be in part available by the means you have described.
I suggest that for that to deal with CO, you might present the mix to a volume of water where an organism that can digest CO can be grown. It would consume some of the Oxygen, but get rid of the CO, and the biomass might have value.
Terraformer I will try again, this time sticking closer to your post(quote) as a reference:
On the other hand, that oil money is placating a lot of people. What happens when the Arab oil states destabilise? What about Russia? You can't close the borders, even if you try.
Which then has repercussions for energy sources. How much did the recent attack in Ukraine (on the electricity connection to Crimea0 cost to mount, and how much damage did it do? How much will it cost to guard every stretch of powerline in a country? Regular attacks would make large, centralised power sources such as nuclear, large scale wind and solar, hydro, tidal, coal, and (heavy) oil uneconomical, which would shift resources towards resilient microgrids running on solar, microhydro, diesel, and natural gas. Which would then change the balance of power *within* countries.
It all depends of what is destabilize. If they have oil they can make water. Greenhouse gasses? That's not my responsibility. They could make it for some time. As for the leadership, well, they are the best on the planet at what they do. But shall we run our economic foreign policy to protect them?
Russia is not a dying culture. In fact they are doing relatively well with their population. The Orthodox church I have read is more compatible with the Islam that exists in their country. The birth rates of non-Islamic and Islamic peoples is reasonably close. The Russians in their own way understand what they are dealing with much better than at least we in the USA do. They can probably handle the situation. Usually literally the Muslims that are in their country are not at massive odds with the nation state. So, they can even be an asset to the Russians.
As for the power lines, this is what happens when you let morons who understand domination and communication loose on the world.
Who did it? I don't know. I know it wasn't a technically(And productive) oriented person.
The Russians and Ottomans had 13 wars I believe, and you might be able to correct me, but I think the Russians won all 13.
You are probably right about centralized methods being subject to attention from Idiot Savants from the Old Old world. And correct that decentralization and a grid are a proper response.
I like it. Good stuff.
Reasonable questions. Sorry for the late response I did not see your post.
All I can offer is my thinking, which does not require that you accept it. I believe that my thinking to a point, is a better model of reality than that of many who propose to own/manipulate reality to their continued benefit.
I took the time some time ago to diagnose reality. I choose not to say what the data was that I investigated, but I can tell you that eventually morons were attracted to my activity, and damaged the data. I don't believe they understood what I was after, and I don't believe they comprehend what it represented.
Each people, "whatever that is" travel through time, supposing that once they have achieved a "Blessing" it is due to them no matter what they do. When that privilege seems to be threatened, the first thing they will try to do is manipulate reality to bring their privilege back to them. Increasingly it requires that they do manipulations that are harder and harder to maintain their privilege. Eventually the immorality of what they do weighs on their future.
All of this happens as a geometric calculation through space and time. The calculator never misses a wrong doing, all is paid back in some way. Either you will confess and find humility and take a loss, or you will eventually take a loss and be charged interest for wasting the universes time and space.
And it is your choice to believe that or not ![]()
Now as a responsible citizen of this universe, I have a choice to exploit an emerging child, which is capability, by using efficiency. But that is morally wrong. We do not efficiently consume children. If we are decent. But the shadows conceal a different reality. The Uga Booga stew pot still exists, and we have plenty of people who want to march us into it. Punch such people, slap them, trip them, beat them with a stick as necessary. Don't get in their stew pot.
At the same time it is required that a child will struggle a bit, perhaps significantly. If it does not, how "Can it learn to fly?" To deny a child struggle is to deny them the inheritance they could receive from the death of their childhood, when they become adults.
Obviously this opens the door to the thinking of idiots. To say "What does not kill me will make me stronger", seems to forget that a piano falling on me from above that severs my spine might not kill me but perhaps puts me in a wheel chair, then I can go to the gym(but obtain less value from it), and I have hygiene problems, psychological problems. Really, yes perhaps then in a wheel chair I can be an example of a certain strength, but lets be honest, I will then be easy lion meat if a lion shows up.
So, an idiot will try to breed horses that can live on less food, until the horse needs no food. (Dead horse). So the point is the need for a child to struggle is no excuse for purposeful neglect or cruelty, or a selfish variety either.
But, back to the tides of time;
In my opinion we are at a major turning of the tide. Some have supposed that the movement of power from the west to the east would involve the "West" falling and the Middle East rising. The Middle East is not the East however.
We are also at the point of a minor tide reversal as well. The time of the European Empires is over. They were like a wind rushing into a vacuum. Well the pressure has equalized.
Should you read the information currently on the internet about the European, you have three or four main groups that created them. You have the Hunter Gatherers who strangely enough had blue eyes but dark skin in North West Europe. You had tall pale farmers from the Middle East, and you had some people from the Steps that brought in the Wheel, and horses (It seems that they might have had a subset of a different Hunter Gatherer type from the Caucasus area in their pool as well.
Of the three, the farmers have a chance at efficiency. But their efficiency leads to redundant behaviors without sufficient challenge.
On the other hand people who move around a lot encounter more variation. This would be true for Hunter Gatherers, and for the Plains peoples. Of course for the plains, the challenge was to move long distances. For the hunter gatherer, you had to move through a more chaotic reality, and in many cases it was more 3 dimensional.
With the efficiency of farming came cities. With that came also a greater portion of slavery, and hierarchy, and the very much to be dreaded specialization.
Then under those circumstances you don't need a full deck of cards so to speak, for a mind.
I recall seeing an astronaut speak about the mind. He mentioned an organism that when it is juvenile is mobile and has a brain. Later in adulthood, it anchors itself to the ocean bottom, and the first thing it does is eat it's brain, because it does not need it anymore. Nature does not favor intelligence, our supposed intelligence is due to historical challenge, and motion is almost always involved.
Russia and the true Western Europe (In the west by the North Sea, Duh), are to be in accention, and I am sorry, but the M.E. and Med, not so good. They had the last 500 years. Go to sleep.
We have seen what has happened when we tried to "Westernize" some country to the East of Greece. Ya, sure, that's going good isn't it. They are CHEETING! They don't want to earn their place, they want to simply demand it.
What needs to be avoided is rewarding peoples who eat their brains, use mental specializations excessively, engage in hierarchy, and dominate other peoples around them for wealth. They do this unfortunately with communications as a tool.
Communication is a double edged sword. It provides efficiency, but it also allows a sort of cheat (Which we all use). Communication does not favor intelligence. It does favor education.
Intelligence is the ability to sort information out of noise.
I think it is incredibly hilarious when they say on the news that some government agency is getting intelligence on the ground, lets say in Iraq or some other country. Shouldn't they be getting chatter/noise, and shouldn't they find their intelligence in their minds, and use their minds to extract intelligence from the chatter/noise? But that's what you get from people who are idiot savant communicators.
Alright I will try to get to the point.
1) The tides of time are currently against the persistence of what was.
2) Many people in the west are taking "Sugar" from people who have large oil deposits to warp what they are doing. They are not for instance acting to protect the American nation for instance. (Or your nation).
3) Similarly, on a periodic basis, our treasury gets drained in order to fight some war over in those places. And then they tell us we don't have enough money for our entitlements. That's humorous, if it's is an entitlement, am I not entitled. How come they seem to want to mix my entitlements with the mercy we distribute to the unfortunate? Well the realty is they scrape the honey from the hive, and give it to people who are not me. I will leave you to guess who those people are.
4) Those people over there don't want to westernize, in fact they want to eat their brains. Have one book, use sophisticated weapons, but otherwise not engage in technological abilities. They are creatures of communication, specialization, and violence. That is it.
They need a nice challenge. If we can we should remove the sugar, and let them know that when they are done eating their brains, they can go hungry, because they are not getting anyone into their uga buga stew pots.
In other words, get a real job, quit acting like you own the universe, and have the right to take things from other people who actually work and think.
By taking the sugar, of course I do not intend to take their oil, just make it irrelevant.
We should have an intelligence agency which is intelligent, which watches who takes sugar money from those people. Then we should make sure that the sugar babies are not allowed to mess with the course of our history.
End for now.
Please join the conversation Robert.
Spacenut, OK, I will sidestep from the Mega Futurist Large Lake city and try to be helpful to answer Roberts question of soil with you. It is important to provide for vigor for the first small community, so that the following much larger presence can be parented well by it.
Here I offer this. Yes your organic materials, really as ugly as it may be even all human waste. I am squeamish however for certain things, I would really want to see some kind of hygienic sterilization process, and then to see what we can do with mushrooms.
http://www.gmushrooms.com/MushroomInfor … osting.htm
http://nrcmushroom.org/Folder_Recycling_SMS_Folder.pdf
And really, why not? No lights needed except to set up, inspect, and harvest. And a contribution to food sources cannot be dismissed as unwelcome.
Later, I will return to what I was talking about, and we will see if anyone is even willing to acknowledge that I am posting the materials, but for now starter colony soil.
Well, for a while since the last post, I have been thinking about this.
I think it might be possible to extract organic materials from dune materials at the bottom of such a lake, or dune materials in a process line of our making in the lake.
The most optimistic outcome being the extraction of a food resource from such a "Mud".
The least optimistic being the extraction of fuel resources.
Between those, the possibility of raising mushrooms on dune soil that has been enriched by organics.
What about tilling the soil at the bottom of the lake, aerating the soil, and also extracting H2, Hydrogen, Nitrous Oxide, and perhaps even organic matter.
Adding CO2, N2, and CO for instance, during the tilling.
Another alternative would be to wait for such soil to accumulate organic matter, and then take it and raise mushrooms on it.
Point being you might really get a lot of needs satisfied. Maybe you would not need as many crops raised under photosynthesis. (Which might make living on Mars easier profit wise).
And if you might contemplate the above, perhaps you can think of a process line with tanks and pipelines, etc. You get it factory level stuff.
I though I might have a lot more to say, but my me is going south of the border. Maybe later.
Well, thanks Robert. We do clash. Our backgrounds are skewed in different directions, and our means to objectives are different.
Often when I argue a point it may be on the basis of evidence procured from the internet, and that is not always correct or understandable.
I will take your word that those craters do indicate water. I was mislead by what I read.
There is some benefit at least from my end perhaps to come eventually by me trying to integrate your projected methods with what I have tried to propose. So, far, it has produced mutant ideas, that come in as impractical or impossible, but I have a feeling that eventually it will show profit.
My best projected offering I might propose would hybrid GW's mushroom houses with your structured thinking, and try to integrate them into a lake type real estate setting. As I have said it is not read for prime time. At the moment I am speculating on a situation where you have a "Mushroom House" with transparency on the sides. Instead of Regolith on the top however, a bag of water. Above that solar panels. The entire transparency should be surrounded by a robot which is also a reflective Heliostat which can spin around that circular window it envelopes, reflecting sunlight in from the leeward side of the sun source. The idea would be to make the mirror specifically reflective of visible light, and either absorbing of U.V. or fluorescent of it so that it converts U.V. to visible wavelengths. I also have a flower petal design in mind where the petals on hinges can cover the windows as the sunlight moves to directly intercept them. The petals would also be able to fold upwards to hold in heat at night. There again, the intent would be to greatly reduce the U.V. by selective reflectance of a mirror, and ideally incorporating a fluorescent effect to add visible light to what enters the greenhouse. In this way, I would hope to increase the lifetime of plastic films used as the transparent windows.
I think that in the age of robotics which is emerging it is not a bad pathway to investigate robot/heliostats with special reflective/fluorescent coatings for such a purpose, particularly if maintaining transparent windows with plastics is going to be such a economic load.
Anyway, back to the mushroom house structure, where I start with GW's design, and add a water tank on top, really the water tank is for counter pressure. As for the water within, perhaps you could do something biological with it, but really its real purpose is to provide counter-pressure, and to provide temperature moderations for the day/night cycles. The hot air in the greenhouse going to the ceiling during sunny days, and being absorbed, and at the night that heat being re-radiated into the greenhouse. Another value of using water, is it can be adjusted to some degree, as for the load on the ceiling, if that would have value.
As for the Mushroom, I actually add a long stem which is a passage down into the lake. Your mushroom could be pressurized to the degree you want, most likely lets say from 50-330 mb pressure. As in a barometer, the water column in the tube will respond with height appropriately. Your pressurization will depend on what you want to grow, and if shirt-sleeve humans/EVA Humans/Robots will work with the plants.
A polite response will be preferred, as I presented this as extremely proto-type and tentative, hoping that will be adjustable to practicality.
I have presented it for your entertainment as potential Fertilizer for the garden of your mind, sir.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In my other fantasy world, I am back to trying to exploit UNEARTHLY effects on Mars. As you may have read I am attempting to find a way of harnessing the powers of corrosion of dune materials to provide resources for settlers.
One other thing I am rather infatuated with is atmospheric separations. Apparently this has been looked into on this site and elsewhere. On this site I recall Antius having some involvement. Cryogenics were contemplated for that purpose. However they require lower temperatures than I would prefer to use.
So, I would like to see if there is a way to remove the CO2 from captured atmosphere, and deal with the remnant in some other way.
For the removal of the CO2, we might consider pressurization and the night time cold temperatures. Alternate Reverse Osmosis might be considered, (I think) squeezing all gasses out through a membrane, except CO2. Or the reverse, pumping atmosphere into a plastic bubble which allows the CO2 only to leak out. I believe we bumped into that potential in our conversation about ETFE which has been treated with embedded glass. (If I have that right).
Anyway, at least I want all the atmospheric gasses except the CO2 to go into a production stream. If the CO2 can be liquefied then it could easily be used to turn a turbine later to generate electricity, using heat from a lake, or solar energy.
I will get more direct. In particular I want to get the Oxygen out of the mix. At this time I am contemplating the use of Electrowinning.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrowinning
Please don't consider this rude, I just want to emphasize, that I am not contemplating Electrolysis.
There seems to be a persisting confusion on that, so I want to offer clarity for what I am after. I am not saying that I definitely understand how to get what I am after, but I do have a specific notion of what I am after.
It is obvious that corrosion will not produce free Oxygen, it will provide Hydrogen, and in the presence of a Carbon source (CO2 & CO), microbes might create Methane in the waters at the bottom of this lake. Of course the lake bottom itself will be food, but really not much surface area is presented that way. Adding dune grains to the bottom of the water will "Feed" the stomach of the lake. Lots of surface area. The food is well chewed ![]()
It may be possible to control the PH of the bottom water by the quantity of the dune material balanced against the amount of CO2 you dissolve in the water. Of course this would be done to aid digestion of the dune materials. My understanding is that the dune sands will rapidly alter in the presence of liquid water. (Rapid as a unit of time is poorly defined in that description). But if the result were to resemble the serpentinization of Olivine and the metals in the dune materials which may not be completely Oxidized yet, I would expect to produce salts of metals dissolved in the slightly acid water. Additionally as stated before H2 should result and I also hope that CLAY will result.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olivine
Well, here is some interesting material, not quite mentioning clay, but giving some time definition for one pathway for the decay of Olivine.
A worldwide search is on for cheap processes to sequester CO2 by mineral reactions, called enhanced weathering. Removal by reactions with olivine is an attractive option, because it is widely available and reacts easily with the (acid) CO2 from the atmosphere. When olivine is crushed, it weathers completely within a few years, depending on the grain size. All the CO2 that is produced by burning 1 liter of oil can be sequestered by less than 1 liter of olivine. The reaction is exothermic but slow. To recover the heat produced by the reaction to produce electricity, a large volume of olivine must be thermally well-isolated. The end-products of the reaction are silicon dioxide, magnesium carbonate and small amounts of iron oxide.[22][23]
Oh, and I do believe that the reaction also creates heat, so it will help heat the lake.
Back to Electrowinning. I believe that metals can be extracted to the cathode of the device from the lake waters. It may be that dissolved Hydrogen and perhaps Methane can be concentrated that way as well.
In this case I am not aiming for the Oxygen we might want yet. At this time I am contemplating the use of Electrowinning.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrowinning
Please don't consider this rude, I just want to emphasize, that I am not contemplating Electrolysis.
So, we have our Cathode(s) in the bottom of the lake, and we are attempting to collect dissolved Metals/Hydrogen/Methane on the Cathode(s).
Perhaps we could try to put the Anode(s) in the upper waters, and hope to extract dissolved Oxygen. But there will not likely be any unless we put it there.
If we have treated Martian atmospheric gasses by removing the CO2 (Or as much as suits us, since it is going to get used in the corrosion process down below), we can add other gasses, including Oxygen.
I believe that their is about twice as much Oxygen as Carbon Monoxide in the mix, and that N2 and Argon will be added as well. So, I would hope to collect some of the Oxygen on the Cathode(s). As for the Nitrogen and Argon and Carbon Monoxide.
The Carbon Monoxide might be digested by Micro-organisms in the lake. They might use Oxygen, or H20 as the Oxidizer.
As for Nitrogen, I believe that in Hypersaline cold lakes an interaction occurs where Nitrous Oxide is produced. I don't know what would be done with that or about that, but perhaps somewhere in the process you could extract both purified N2, and Nitrous Oxide. As for the Argon, isn't that inert?
Maybe really you would subject water which has the Oxygen and Carbon Monoxide exhausted by Electrowinning or microbes, subject that to a vacuum and by Henry's laws extract a N2 and Argon Mix.
So, a cyborg ecosystem that runs on Corrosion and breaths Martian air. (And is quite adaptable to hybridize with solar power options).
Well here is an article that I think helps to produce a focused understanding of what has happened and very likely what is happening going forward a while.
Don’t write off the future of oil and gas just yet
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/oilp … t-yet.html
So, if I have it broke down correctly it appears that we in the U.S. and likely the West will stop using Coal, are doing so, replacing it with natural gas. If we do this, then we will have removed enough Carbon from our energy budgets, to correct for the climate change anxieties, we will be home free.
And then there is this: (I presume that the renewable energy mentioned here applies to the planetary efforts, not just the U.S.)
With wind and solar on track to exceed 100 gigawatts in new installations for the first time this year, 2015 is shaping up to be a watershed. Extrapolating from present trends, the investment bank finds that renewable energy sources will add the oil equivalent of 6.2 million barrels per day by 2020, or more than the entire US shale revolution in the previous five years. Eventually, critical mass will be achieved, closing the cost gap with hydrocarbons.
So, going forward, we can have a lot, if not "It All", and won't have to pay much rent to OPEC at all. This should be fantastic news for industrial space faring entities.
Being strong enough to fend off conquest (Rape) from the Blighted areas, I anticipate that indeed vast areas of the world will be allowed to practice the Autarky which has been mentioned by others. The Blighted areas will be forced to change their ways, or be mostly irrelevant.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autarky
I am not against global free trade for the economic purpose, I just don't think that the pressure for it will be as large as it previously was.
And in many cases global trade for commodities has caused some very bad moral situations to emerge.
Now they can get real jobs instead of running around causing trouble.
I'm tempted to mess with you but I won't.
Good work.
I resisted because of the historical articles which indicated lava.
More recent work indicates that the manner of the freezing of the water or lava, indicates that it would not be lava.
I objected to water due to the shape of the craters in that picture. They are bowl shaped, and do not indicate a muddy ice "splosh".
It took me a while, but it occurred to me that those craters could have been there before the water was flowed into that location. They would have acted like dams, and very little or no water would have flowed into the craters. So, bowl shaped craters do not ultimately disqualify the possibility that there is a frozen sea there.
Finally recent articles I have read vastly upgrade the amount ice that may be buried under ground on Mars. This ice is fossil and was deposited billions of years ago.
With all that, sure I would say there are fair odds that the frozen sea is there. Such a sea suits my purposes as well as yours. It will be checked out before the settlement of Mars and confirmed or denied. If it happens that it is an unsuitable location after all, then for my purposes, I would anticipate an eventual secondary settlement at a higher latitude, which will utilize lake methods for habitation. Tom K. identified a giant slab of ice which can serve as a potential secondary target.
Tom K.'s alternate site:
http://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=7288
My collected references about fossil ice in the rift valley and also the whole northern hemisphere of Mars.
http://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=7291
I think that I could easily find that they will some day prove that Mars is as bone dry as they tried to put fourth for many decades, but from my current information, I anticipate that is vastly icy in it's Northern Hemisphere.
I prefer your site, but if it fails to satisfy, there are likely to be alternates.
I a bit sorry (But not very much) if I see more evidence that perhaps the tides of reality will turn to our favor.
Fracking Optimist:
http://www.tomasinmorgan.com/index.php? … &Itemid=27
So, I could see the limits of Fracking, and actually it sounded like it was going to be a flash in the pan.
However, now that the prices for doing it have been reduced by innovative technology, I can see that more tight oil will be economic to recover. If that was not enough, then their is this;
http://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/OP … -Boom.html
Hmm? I can burn coal, push the CO2 into the ground, get much more oil and (Money), and compete most politely
with our dire enemies. And I can then avoid a Carbon Tax, and also to be nice also indeed develop some more solar and wind, (More nails in their coffins, applause, smiles
, Lets do a wooden stake, silver bullets, and garlic for full measure)?
And we Win, Win, Win? Yup, Yup, Yup somebody says.
OPEC, Get Ready For The Second U.S. Oil Boom
What OPEC countries fear most is a follow-up technological revolution that will lead to a second oil boom in the U.S., and that fear is now being realized.
A technological revolution spurred the U.S. oil boom that resulted in the greatest increase in domestic oil production in a century, and while that has stuttered in the face of a major oil price slump and an OPEC campaign to maintain a grip on market share, the American response could be another technological revolution that demonstrates that the first one was merely an impressive embryonic experiment.
It’s not only about shale now—it’s about reviving mature oil fields through advancements in enhanced oil recovery, potentially opening up not only new shale fields, but older fields that have been forgotten.
There are myriad gloom-and-doom stories about what is often alluded to as a short-lived oil boom in the U.S. But what many fail to understand is that revolutions of this nature are phased, with the advent of new technology typically followed by a temporary halt in progress while we study the results and come up with something even better.
Related: Top 5 Oil Producing Countries Could See Production Peak This Year
What we’re looking at here are advancements in EOR for greater production and cost efficiency that can weather oil price slumps and awaken America’s sleeping giant oil fields. Soon we are likely to see some new players in the field buying up oil assets and putting more advanced EOR technologies to work to re-ignite the revolution.
The shale revolution was stunning, indeed. But there have been setbacks—even beyond the oil price slump that has rendered fracking expensive. Fracking uses a lot of water. According to a recent U.S. Geological Survey study, the process uses up to 9.6 million gallons of water per well and is putting farming and drinking sources at risk in arid states, and especially in major drought-ridden shale-boom venues like Texas.
Phase two of the U.S. oil boom hits at the heart of the inadequacies of the first phase, in a natural progression.
There are two very interesting EOR advancements that have caught our attention in recent months: CO2 EOR and Plasma Pulse Technology (PPT).
CO2, or carbon dioxide EOR, involves injecting CO2 into ageing oil fields to sweep residual oil to the surface. In some cases, it can extend the production life of a field by more than 25 years. The U.S. is fortunate in this regard because it has a large volume of low-cost, naturally occurring CO2 at its disposal; however, in order to be widely employed the infrastructure to deliver it to oil fields has to be in place.
Visiongain estimates that global CO2 EOR spending will be $4.74 billion this year. “This will decline in the short term as low oil prices take their toll on the capital spending programmes of CO2 EOR operators, but is expected to rise rapidly in the next decade.”
Then we have something a bit more futuristic, even though it is already commercially viable—Plasma Pulse Technology, or PPT. This is a patent pending technology that enables the “re-opening” of wells without water, without polluting chemicals and without causing earthquakes. The ”re-opening” side of this equation means that it doesn’t open rock like fracking, rather it comes in afterwards and cleans up well bores to clear the pathway for oil to flow faster and more efficiently to the surface like it once did.
Plasma Pulse Technology (PPT) creates a controlled plasma arc within a vertical well, generating a tremendous amount of heat for a fraction of a second, while the subsequent high-speed hydraulic impulse wave emitted is strong enough to remove any clogged sedimentation from the perforation zone without damaging the steel casing. The series of impulse waves also penetrates deep into the reservoir, which re-opens reservoir permeability for up to a year per treatment.
Related: Nuclear Is Not Dead, Uranium Supply Deficit Could Be On The Horizon
But to determine what new EOR technology is going to steal the limelight in the coming months and years, we follow the progress of the EOR leaders and the big strategic investors, such as Russian billionaire Roman Abramovich.
$80 Oil By Christmas – Do NOT Be Fooled By The Mainstream Media
The current market turmoil has created a once in a generation opportunity for savvy energy investors.
Whilst the mainstream media prints scare stories of oil prices falling through the floor smart investors are setting up their next winning oil plays.Click here for more info on successful oil investing
The market leader in extracting oil and gas using CO2 enhanced oil recovery processes is Denbury Resources (NYSE:DNR), which many will agree is a company that offers investors long-term value because of its focus on efficiency.
As for Abramovich, he is a metals magnate who also happens to own the Chelsea football club and is the 143rd wealthiest person in the world, worth about $9 billion according to Forbes. He is the main owner of UK-registered Millhouse LLC, a private investment company whose assets have included major stakes in Sibneft, which is now Gazprom Neft. In 2005, Millhouse sold a 72 percent stake in Sibneft to Gazprom for more than $13 billion.
In fact, PPT first caught our eye back in February, when Abramovich—who has a track record of very strategic investments--moved to invest $15 million in a Houston-based company called Propell Technologies Group, Inc. (OTC:PROP). Until Abramovich brought it to the world’s attention, few had probably ever heard of Propell, which has a wholly-owned subsidiary called Novas Energy U.S.A, the licensee and developer of the PPT technology.
The subsidiary licenses the technology from a venture capital-backed Russian energy technology company named Novas Energy, and the Russian connection makes sense here. After all, Plasma Pulse technology has been very successfully employed in both Russian producer and injector wells. More than anything, this Russian connection speaks volumes about the efficiency of this advanced EOR technology: Russia doesn’t have draconian fracking regulations pressuring companies to use environmentally friendly technology. What this means is that it’s cost effective; otherwise Russians wouldn’t be using it.
Beyond the technology itself, if we follow Abramovich further we get a glimpse of what’s about to happen on the U.S. EOR scene. In February, Abramovich took a stake with Propell, which was made through a Cyprus-registered company called Ervington Investments Limited. The February deal saw Propell raise $5 million from the sale of 1,525,424 shares of a preferred stock at $3.28 per share. The deal also gave Ervington the option to invest an additional $9.75 million, under the same terms, which it took advantage of on July 6. This Abramovich investment will be used to acquire oilfields with the overall aim to employ the new technology to increase output.
You have to read between the lines here. Abramovich doesn’t do anything small. He’ll get the infrastructure in place and then look to acquire a significant position in the U.S. oil sector at today’s fire sale prices to employ this EOR technology.
Related: Oil Price Plunge Raises Fears for Indebted Shale Companies
If OPEC keeps oil prices below $100 for some time to come, the smart investor will be looking for something that captures long-term value, which means focusing on operational efficiency.
So while many might assume that EOR is now too expensive to be supported during an oil price slump, a little counter-intuition tells us that this will change in the immediate future and investors will start looking at companies who are actually behind this new technology or the companies who are focusing on using this new technology--whether it be CO2 EOR or PPT--to get more out of their oilfields.
Over the long-term EOR makes production cheaper. And as Chesapeake Energy’s (NYSE:CHK) Jason Pigott succinctly put it: “We can’t control prices, so we have to focus on how much it costs to get it out of the ground.”
When low oil prices close doors, technology steps in to reopen them, and certainly innovation will drive the next U.S. oil boom—and the latest advancements are already commercially viable. The door has been re-opened.
What OPEC knows is this: The U.S. has over 21 billion barrels of oil that could be economically recovered with today’s EOR technologies. And according to figures from the U.S. Department of Energy and the Western Governors Association (WGA), further advances in this technology could cause that figure to double.
By James Stafford of Oilprice.com
My Goodness: Plasma Pulse technology
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbGmNjx_F3U
I am not going to bother with the geopolitical aspects (Excessively). It is apparent that their are serous chances that the balance of energy power is shifting in the future to where Eurasian and not the others will have energy dominance. This bodes well for space industry, since, the "Others" like to verbalize grievances and do tribal warfare on each other and us. That is how they understand reality. They understand communication, even literacy, but they limit their literature to approved documents, as far as technology, they understand things that make easy money where you don't have to think and they understand dominance over other peoples to make money and to replace other peoples genes with there questionable value genes.
So, we may have the blessings of the preferred dominance of technological peoples in the relevant future. Hurray, maybe.
Terraformer said:
Re. direct photolysis of water - this offers the possibility of piping in water to sunny areas and piping out methane. Even if both steps are 60% efficient, that's still far more efficient (36%) than photovoltaics (20%), and about the same if used in a generator at another 40% loss. Plus, once you have the hydrogen, making methane doesn't require much electricity - more heat, which can be provided by concentrated solar.
I am guessing sooner or later someone here on Earth will implement such a process, in order to get some kind of "Carbon Credit", and to of course create a useful product. We will what to watch for such things.
Some things I notice about this site, is (1) when it comes to energy and chemical processes, they think in terms of solar panels and nuclear. This is understandable since it is high science, and also typically what the machines sent into space and to Mars use. (2) Typically they also want to recreate Earth on Mars, to the point they might bypass some factor Mars has to offer, simply because we don't do it on Earth.
To improve on #1, I suggest a greater awareness of what is going on in the world of alternative energy. I am not an especially perceptive person to now understand that the Hydrocarbon industry as we once new it is on it's way out. Curiously, the Gulf states might be a great place to look for advanced developments in solar energy. They are going to be living on a leaner budget, and are apparently aware that they are going to have to seek new methods. If they cannot produce their own innovation (I don't know if they can or can't), then they will hire it from the true East, and the West, so we will see many things develop there. They are of course involved with the Petrochemical industry, so I would be looking for them to integrate solar of all kinds with that existing industry. Another thing I have become aware of is that they are consuming more and more energy to produce water for their populations, and a very high cost. We should want to look at what they are doing and see if it has application to Mars.
For #2, I think RobertDyck is to most recreationalist, while some others are more open to exploring the unearthly characteristics that Mars has to offer. Both fields should be continued to be explored in my opinion. One field seeks to recreate the Earth on Mars, and the other seeks to exploit what Mars has to offer which is unfamiliar.
One thing about doing photolysis by certain methods, is that you could get both a chemical and a thermal benefit from the same machine, and that suits me well. If you want the truth, I want great benefit with small effort. That's potentially very profit oriented thinking.
Low hanging fruit that have been identified so far are (1) Day / Night and Seasonal temperatures. (2) Photolysis can be done with or without U.V., but I think U.V. offers a massive potential above visible light. (3) You might note that I have been talking about sand dunes. Apparently they can be made in part of Olivine, which under certain circumstances oxidizes in the presence of water and produces Hydrogen and possibly Clay. That is something I am interested in.
And their will be other things.
Of course I am often bothering you guys with lakes. It is because I see so much potential for them to serve the material needs of humans on Mars. And that can be by unconventional means I suggest.
For instance suppose RobertDyck's frozen sea exists, and it's location is inhabited.
What is serpentinization?
http://jersey.uoregon.edu/~mstrick/AskG … rry45.html
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn … a-on-mars/

45 metres deep
The team of researchers, led by John Murray at the Open University, UK, estimates the submerged ice sea is about 800 by 900 kilometres in size and averages 45 metres deep. Images of the pack-ice-like plates can be seen in this PDF document, which was not embargoed when New Scientist first viewed it on 15 February.
So far, I think Imperial, so: 45m= 147ft 7.653546in
This should come is as perhaps ~1.350 bars of pressure on the average bottom of such a sea/lake.
So there is plenty of room to put a layer of undigested dune material on the bottom of the lake. The benefits I would hope to procure would be: (1) Oxidation of the material will produce provide for (a) Hydrogen (b) Clay. (That is what I hope for). I don't know what the rate of Oxidation at those temperatures will be, so it may or may not be a proficient method.
While my intentions for Clay are bricks, and radiation shielding, it turns out if you query for it clay is also useful for treating the body for contamination from radioactive chemicals. Just some more information. I am thinking that for certain situations, clothing with encapsulated wet clay (In plastic bubbles), might help to provide additional protection from radiation on Mars, as well, as even be useful to maintain body tone in the .38 g gravity field.
I also have of course other ideas about what to do with clay, for instance your Roman Arch buildings might be covered with wet clay with fibers incorporated. If the moisture could be maintained, this may provide a very good air tight seal. Sort of an "Air Dam" using wet clay counterweight, and also in concert with the added fibers, some tensile force to resist transient pressure deviations.
Back to the lake where you have put Olivine and other minerals from a dune on the bottom of the Lake and you presume H2 is bubbling out. You may now compress Martian atmosphere directly into the lake in proportion to Henry's law. There are some variables I will not go into detail here. So, now your lake has dissolved Martian atmospheric gasses in it, and H2 from the alteration of the dune materials. A biological system may operated living off of these chemicals. It should also occur that if you put CO2 into the water, it should become slightly more acid, and I speculate that will promote the conversion of dune material to H2 and Clay.
Should you really want to you might choose to "Frack" the floor of the Lake, and hope to actually create Serpentization driven Ocean Floor vents. But I would just try to use the dune material instead.
http://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/explorati … obial.html
Methane-based life
People like to eat organic compounds. Pizza, peanut butter, and chocolate are among my favorites. Unfortunately, not much pizza or peanut butter is available to organisms living inside carbonate chimneys at the Lost City. Instead, significant amounts of methane and hydrogen gas are entrained within the fluids venting out of the chimneys. So, perhaps not surprisingly, within the chimneys there are colonies of micro-organisms that like to "eat" methane and hydrogen gas. Eating nothing but methane and hydrogen gas (especially without any organic compounds or oxygen) would kill you and me very quickly. Yet for these microbes, it's the best way to extract energy for growth and reproduction.
Lost City Biofilm
Colonies of microbes are attached to carbonate material from within the chimney walls. Some colonies form filamentous strands, such as the one shown in the far right of this microphotograph. Eash small dot (microbe) that makes up the strand is about 1 micron in size. Click image for larger view and image credit. (HR)We believe that a very high proportion of the organisms living within the chimney walls are using the hydrogen gas to make more methane. Organisms that generate methane are known as methanogens. The methane produced by the Lost City methanogens is consumed by other species of microbes. And just as organic matter synthesized by green plants from carbon dioxide, sunlight, and water provides food for you and me, the organic matter created by the methanogens feeds other species at the Lost City. Rather than using water and sunlight, methanogens create organic matter from carbon dioxide and hydrogen gas, and they do so at temperatures possibly reaching 90°C - 194°F!
Of course the lake bottom will not be hot like that, but I anticipate that their are bacteria which will do the job.
Anyway with just this you may have a source of organic chemistry. Plastics, and perhaps even food.
If your lake is briny, then you may have both an anoxic warm layer on the bottom, and a colder Oxidized layer on the top. This is due to an inversion possible from the relative lightness of a less briny cold layer over a more briny warmer layer.
So you might do this on the surface of your lake:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_power_tower![]()
So you can direct the heat from the tower into the lower layer of your lake, which will also provide a power generating ability as well, and;
you may at the same time: Do the direct photolysis of water and/or CO2 which you mentioned.
I suspect that at the ambient pressures of Mars you might get away with having the H2, Methane, and O2 mixed without serious explosion problems. If that proves true, then you can suck the gas out and mix it with the upper cold lake water, and that will provide a second method of chemical stimulation of the lake. The lake could have an ultimate result of the total consumption of the O2, if you just let the organisms convert all chemicals to body mass, and then let other organisms digest the resulting biomass against the O2, but if you interrupt the food web and extract the biomass, and convert it to Plastics, it is possible that you would be left with an O2 surplus in the lake, at least in the upper cold layer.
With all that, it might be nice to have a pleasant place to live. Some of that could be in the lake, some on top of the lake. Perhaps RobertDyck could loan us this:
Connection with the lake could be a vertical or diagonal tube from this dwelling to either the cold upper layer or the warm lower layer. It might provide an escape path if things go wrong topside, and will certainly provide access to the resources of the lake.
I have always thought you were a good one GW. And far be it for me to dare tell Texans they may or may not frack. It is none of my fracking business really.
I don't care if it does not last more then 30 years. We will be on our way down the road B4 the other creepy's can ever get on their bicycles. And we will have their cigars also.
I care about what you feel about your local resources, and have no intention of making you handle them other that what you might want to do.
Three energy solutions that excite Bill Gates
http://www.cnbc.com/2015/11/29/the-ener … =103202339
Solar chemical technology, flow batteries and solar paint are three examples of promising technologies motivating Bill Gates as he announces a multi-billion dollar private sector coalition alongside top billionaires to accelerate clean energy innovation.
In a paper released on his official blog over the weekend, the world's richest man explained the pressing need for increased public and private funds into research and development (R&D) to make renewable energy cheaper and more effective.
"Promising concepts and viable products are separated by a Valley of Death that neither government funding nor conventional investors can bridge completely."
By launching the Breakthrough Energy Coalition, he hopes capital from the 28 members, who include Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg, Alibaba's Jack Ma, and Amazon's Jeff Bezos, will allow firms to get their ideas into the marketplace. No details on the coalition's size was available but Gates did say the group's goal is as much accelerating progress on clean energy as it is making a profit.
His announcement came as the United Nations conference on climate change kicked off in Paris on Sunday, where governments hope to ink an agreement to cap the rate of global warming at 2 degrees Celsius compared with the current rate of 2.5-3.76 degrees.
Smoke billows from smokestacks and a coal fired generator at a steel factory on November 19, 2015 in the industrial province of Hebei, China.
Bill Gates is right about clean energy innovationGates' mention of three specific energy solutions primarily serves to underline his overall argument for more investment into R&D since none of the technologies are likely to be ready for a decade, according to his paper. However, Gates failed to mention whether the Breakthrough Energy Coalition will be funding these solutions.
Solar chemical technology essentially uses solar energy to create hydrogen, which can be used as fuel or for commercial purposes, such as making fertilizer.
"Solar chemical would put us on a path to decarbonizing both the electricity and transportation sectors. It would also help a lot with the storage problem, because the world is already very good at storing fuels and moving them around in pipelines, oil tankers, and other infrastructure," Gates wrote.
The second idea, a flow battery, could redefine how we store electricity. By utilizing a rechargeable liquid electrolyte inside two pairs of tanks, flow batteries are much more sustainable than lithium-ion batteries-the current gold standard for electricity storage.
The purpose behind solar paint is to make solar power easier to install. Maintaining solar panels in an average household can be expensive so by finding a light-sensitive dye that can generate electricity, consumers can transform any surface of their house into a solar panel by simply painting it.
<p>COP21 is different from Kyoto Protocol: ACCEL</p> <p>The UN climate change summit COP21, is the first time countries will have legally-binding pledges, says Rosemary Lyster, director at the Australian Center for Climate and Environmental Law. </p>
Solar Chemical Energy:
Images: Solar chemical
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Solar chemical refers to a number of possible processes that harness solar energy by absorbing sunlight in a chemical reaction. The idea is conceptually similar to photosynthesis in plants, which converts solar energy into the chemical bonds of glucose molecules, but without using living organisms, which is why it is also called artificial photosynthesis.[1]
A promising approach is to use focused sunlight to provide the energy needed to split water into its constituent hydrogen and oxygen in the presence of a metallic catalyst such as zinc. This is normally done in a two-step process so that hydrogen and oxygen are not produced in the same chamber, which creates an explosion hazard. Another approach involves taking the hydrogen created in this process and combining it with carbon dioxide to create methane. The benefit of this approach is that there is an established infrastructure for transporting and burning methane for power generation, which is not true for hydrogen. The problem with this approach is that carbon dioxide must be produced to release the stored energy, so it does not truly give "clean" energy. The other main drawback to both of these approaches is common to most methods of energy storage: adding an extra step between energy collection and electricity production drastically decreases the efficiency of the overall process.
It is also possible to use solar light to directly drive industrial chemical reactions and applications, eliminating the need to burn fossil fuels for energy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_chemical
Solar chemical
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Solar chemical refers to a number of possible processes that harness solar energy by absorbing sunlight in a chemical reaction. The idea is conceptually similar to photosynthesis in plants, which converts solar energy into the chemical bonds of glucose molecules, but without using living organisms, which is why it is also called artificial photosynthesis.[1]
A promising approach is to use focused sunlight to provide the energy needed to split water into its constituent hydrogen and oxygen in the presence of a metallic catalyst such as zinc. This is normally done in a two-step process so that hydrogen and oxygen are not produced in the same chamber, which creates an explosion hazard. Another approach involves taking the hydrogen created in this process and combining it with carbon dioxide to create methane. The benefit of this approach is that there is an established infrastructure for transporting and burning methane for power generation, which is not true for hydrogen. The problem with this approach is that carbon dioxide must be produced to release the stored energy, so it does not truly give "clean" energy. The other main drawback to both of these approaches is common to most methods of energy storage: adding an extra step between energy collection and electricity production drastically decreases the efficiency of the overall process.
It is also possible to use solar light to directly drive industrial chemical reactions and applications, eliminating the need to burn fossil fuels for energy.
The existing environment of Mars might be more compatible with Chemical Solar Energy than Earths environment.
For instance we will not care in the same way about a "Carbon Footprint" on Mars. In fact we might like to use to abundant CO2.
and;
At the air pressures current on Mars, explosions of H2 and O2, I think may be much less of a problem, so the process might be simpler. and;
And, the spectrum of light is broader on the surface of Mars than the surface of Earth, so we can expect more vigorous results from the U.V. portion which is very powerful. and;
Mars has many unexplored chemical potentials, for instance the materials of the sand dunes might be profitably involved.
Further;
In the case of Mars, I think that a solar tower could preform several tasks as desired.
1) Solar Chemical Energy.
2) Solar thermal energy. a) Heat, b) Electricity.
3) Terraforming.
The reason I bring all of this to the table is: I think the economic-political setup is correct for us to parallel a Mars effort with this already evolving Earth related efforts, and very little additional cost, and with very large technological advancements.
We know that when a cancer occurs, one route to combatting it is to cut off it's food supply. This I speak of is the interacting of the "Very Old World" with the new world. Some people like to frame it as West vs. East, which is false, since in reality, the East is actually places like China, Japan, and Korea. And the "East" is developing a similar relationship with the "Blighted" areas (The Middle East) that the west is.
I will stop for a moment to point out that I think my moral underpinnings are just fine. The notion I am talking about is that given an option, just like us, China, Japan, and Korea would prefer to be energy independent, and to not have to deal with a group of peoples who have not been able to develop cultural tolerance suitable for the modern world yet. Or will they ever? Actually those people in the blighted areas seem to be proud of intolerance and treachery. Granted, not all of them, maybe not even the majority, but the intolerant parts are sufficient to make the whole of those cultures unsuitable for cultural contacts, and they should be isolated and avoided when possible, made to repent of their transgressions.
So, I see the opportunity to run parallel with the environmentalist lobby, to produce a "Positive" treatment for the "Blight". Which I think most will have to agree, is preferred to the treatment where we are lured into blighted areas to kill lots of people. Not that that can be made to stop, but perhaps it can be reduced in necessity.
The issue of Greenhouse gasses on Earth, and "Global Warming" is not required to be proven for our purposes. If it is real, of course we would want to consider treating it as well. However, our concern is that there are very large social pressures existing which we can run parallel to solve national security issues for "Non-Blight" Nations/Civilizations, and that we can at the same time in a parallel way promote technology which would be useful on Mars, and yes perhaps change how our existence on Earth effects the Global Environment, perhaps in a positive way.
The above diagram I have expressed in words, describes a spherical model of human interaction. It has the capability to bypass the blighted areas.
The blighted areas unfortunately are a regression to a previous edition of reality where the peoples in those areas were able to control interaction between the East and West, and to charge "Rents" on the transactions. These people in those blighted areas are used to having unearned power. Currently they have used Oil instead of such cultural blockages, but they are now it would seem in many cases rebelling against the modern world trying to regress to methods of many centuries back. Our objective should be to bypass them and their oil, by any means necessary.
This cuts off the supply of sugar to the cancer. Cancer is a regression. They are regressions.
Since efforts to go to Mars involve potential space flight from Western and Eastern nations, and not much from the Blighted areas (They are interested in feeding on other humans), I will propose that there should be some actions considered about OIL, in order to protect the West and the East.
1) There is an apparent effort to destroy or damage our Oil Fracking industry. I suggest that a new petroleum reserve be created, where the government can buy and keep capped off wells drilled, as a petroleum reserve. This as a national security measure, and to keep our oil fracking industry more alive (It does not appear to be dying yet though). This would also very much leverage the power of our tight oil supplies, making them last longer, and so they would exist as a tool to mess with the blighted areas.
2) I propose that parts of the existing petroleum storage infrastructure be turned into a for profit device. Sell oil when the price is high, and empty it out to the limits of national security, and buy and fill it up when the prices are low. This could be done to the extent that #1 fills the original purpose of #2 for national security.
3) I think Santa Clause should come to town. http://claus.com/naughtyornice/index.php
I think all external hydrocarbon sources should be rated on a Naughty or Nice list.
a) Do you belong to a cartel? Yes
Naughty.
b) Do you allow (Actually) religious freedom? No
Naughty.
c) What are you doing about Terrorism? Not much? Actually preaching and protecting it?
Naughty.
d) Do you help a Naughty entity to sell Naughty Oil as Nice Oil?
Naughty.
Then tax the naughty oil in accordance with it's naughty rating, put that money in a pot, and allow lawsuits against it for victims of terrorism. And of course be nice to nice oil ![]()
Is this possibly against existing trade laws? Too bad, change it. Those who will not walk on two paws, need to have their face slapped, and we should take their Cigar as well.
They happen to be shame cultures, shame them.
It will also be fun to know that a terrorist will know that whenever they kill and destroy, abundant money will be given to the victims. It does not replace lost life, but it does put salt in the enemy's eye.
Now that we might have let them know that they can't take our lunch money, we can plan ahead for alternative energy to phase in as our tight oil phases out by being used up.
This can put a ring in our Military-Industrial community's nose and allow us to make them point in the direction of the future, rather than the past. (Making lots of money all the same).
So, the opportunity for Convergence of the EcoFriendlies, the Military-Industrial complex, and Space Enthusiasts is appearing up ahead, and I think that it is from that convergence that much of what is needed for the establishment of humans on Mars may come.
That's a generous effort to understand Terraformer.
I don't think you can be so sure. Thanksgiving seems to be celebrated by lot's of people who can't trace their ancestry back to the pilgrims from the Mayflower - Germans, Italians, Irish etc. I don't think that we can be sure that Hispanic immigrants won't pick that up as part of their assimilation.
I have relatives that are mixes of perhaps 8 different things. Not all of them the same mixes either. So far, very good.
As for me, I am a mix of very old N.A. (Wasp) going all the way back, and I am also 3rd generation immigrant line.
At a recent family gathering were people with Swedish, Scotch, English(WASP), German, Mongol, Bohunk(Figure it out). And that leaves out lots of the other stuff my other relatives and associates have. I also have some French https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huguenot in the so called "Engish" part.
Had we had other relatives we would have had part Norwegians, Irish, Finlander, Native American, Italian, and Southern type white, whatever that is. (Probably Scotch-Irish I am guessing. We often don't even bother to ask anymore).
Where is the isolated tribe of dying Wasps?
We recently entered the Anti-Anti-Colonial era, by my estimation. Some people need to update their thinking about what is real, and what justice is, and when to apply mercy.
How about this?
http://earthsky.org/space/amazing-new-i … ov-25-2015
Before I start my predatory stalking behaviors towards this sand dune and it's kin, I might remind the viewers, that to my knowledge it is not alive, and that in the universe there must be countless Mars like worlds with unpredated sandunes. ![]()
I would have put this information in another topic, but, I needed one that will not be sliced to pieces for not being "On Topic", because to make a profit from such a mineral deposit, you try to get as much as you can from it, only letting the squeak go. Actually I have more sympathy for pigs than you might think. I think it is the first farm animal we should phase out, because of it's reported intelligence, not for religious reasons. The danger of cancer is another reason not to eat animals. But please comment a rebuttal elsewhere. This dune to my knowledge is non-living, and does not feel pain. I do want to get the most out of it however.
Next;
http://space.io9.com/sand-dunes-are-rai … 1678443555
It's raining dunes! Well, no, not really, but these olivine-rich sand dunes on Mars really do look like classic cartoon drawings of raindrops sliding across the landscape.
Next;
I hope to digest the dune material by the use of;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serpentinite
Formation and petrology[edit]
Serpentinization is a geological low-temperature metamorphic process involving heat and water in which low-silica mafic and ultramafic rocks are oxidized (anaerobic oxidation of Fe2+ by the protons of water leading to the formation of H2) and hydrolyzed with water into serpentinite. Peridotite, including dunite, at and near the seafloor and in mountain belts is converted to serpentine, brucite, magnetite, and other minerals — some rare, such as awaruite (Ni3Fe), and even native iron. In the process large amounts of water are absorbed into the rock increasing the volume and destroying the structure.[1]
The density changes from 3.3 to 2.7 g/cm3 with a concurrent volume increase on the order of 30-40%. The reaction is highly exothermic and rock temperatures can be raised by about 260 °C (500 °F),[1] providing an energy source for formation of non-volcanic hydrothermal vents. The magnetite-forming chemical reactions produce hydrogen gas under anaerobic conditions prevailing deep in the mantle, far from the Earth's atmosphere. Carbonates and sulfates are subsequently reduced by hydrogen and form methane and hydrogen sulfide. The hydrogen, methane, and hydrogen sulfide provide energy sources for deep sea chemotroph microorganisms.[1]
Serpentinite reactions[edit]
So;
I am thinking the mixing of dune materials and superheated steam might get us the favor of "H2", and oddly Clay for bricks.
So where could you get superheated steam to accelerate this process?
(Solar power towers)
Got any premade excavated locations for that sort of thing?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impact_crater
(For when you might really size this thing up, if you feel you need to.)![]()
Now at some point we might want to figure out if we could get some metals out of the dunes before we turn them into H2 and Clay/Bricks.
Along with other works elsewhere it's been discussed here.
http://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=7316
We should at least hope to get some Chromium, Iron, and Titanium as well as some Basalt fibers/cloth out of the dune before we finalize the process.
OK, so we have some H2, and it appears almost everywhere, Martian Atmosphere.
Previous discussions indicate that we can burn H2 in Martian atmosphere. It requires a high temperature, but it can be done.
However, I prefer a fuel cell. More efficient I presume, and perhaps can be done at pressures closer to Martian ambient pressure.
But Antius and others want to do stuff with Liquid CO2. Why not indulge them (If it works).
How about atmospheric separations.
We might hope to separate the atmosphere of Mars into a liquid CO2 component, and "The Remnant".
http://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=7150
Antius and his kind get to play with the liquid CO2. Otherwise can play with "The Remnant".
Which is likely to include N2, Argon, O2, and CO.
(You might also try reverse Osmosis to get the CO2 out).
So;
You have this H2 which was derived in a non-biological way. You also have the atmospheric remnant gas.
And Fuel Cells. I presume that the O2 and CO can act against H2 as Oxidizers.
That's electricity then from the fuel cells perhaps, and a further remnant gas, N2 and Argon, and the production of H2O and CH4 (Methane).
Do what you like with that. Release to atmosphere for a greenhouse effect, or use Cryrogenics to get what you want out of it.
You let the squeak go, since it is non-existant, I don't think sand dunes squeak.
I think I might have done pretty good, but I a bit tipped just now. I might have to do some clean up later, and some amendments.