You are not logged in.
Clark:-
You won't see what you won't allow yourself to see.
Until you found this thread, Clark, there was no hint of anything obscure which we weren't allowing ourselves to see; no hint of the kind of simple and profound truth you see so clearly and the rest of us don't.
This man's death caused a lot of people to mourn, Clark. It's as simple as that. Mourning is a spontaneous feeling of loss and it affects people who lose someone to whom they are in some way attached. The fact that so many of us here have seen fit to express our common feeling that the world is a little bit poorer for the loss of Christopher Reeve is enough to show that he had something special. If half of one percent of the number of people who mourn his loss were even to notice (never mind mourn) my own passing, I'd think they were confusing me with someone else!
Don't worry, Christopher Reeve's death will soon be old news. Give us this brief moment to grieve for someone we'll miss.
It certainly is very interesting that those distant probes are 'misbehaving'. Their behaviour is at least partially the reason for the Asimov quotation in my signature. As soon as I saw the quote, I imagined the guys at NASA peering at the Pioneer data and saying: "That's funny .."
And, you never know, the tiny discrepancy could be the start of something big in our understanding of what makes space-time tick (excuse the pun).
Hi CM.
Your idea about the energy contained in the solar system, particularly the Sun, is something I'd never considered before. If it were true, though, wouldn't it affect other small bodies in the solar system? Almost all observable natural bodies are much more massive than the Pioneer probes, I realise, but most of them have been tracked orbiting the Sun over many years and any small difference between gravitational theory and practice would surely have been magnified by this repetition and, therefore, easily observed. And wouldn't it be more noticeable in the inner solar system, closer to the main energy supply, than out past Pluto? I've no idea, of course .. just mulling over your hypothesis is all I'm doing.
You referred to the perception that General Relativity holds good for "the scale of the universe at large" but is that necessarily true?
We've had so much trouble explaining why galaxies don't tear themselves apart, rotating as fast at their peripheries as they do, that we've had to come up with mysterious dark matter to supply the extra gravity. Sounds like a 'patch up' job in the physics department to me! :laugh:
Couldn't it be that we really don't know quite as much about gravity as we think we do? And, if so, mightn't this persistent little anomaly with our deep space probes be telling us something very profound?
I'm glad the Europeans are investigating this so thoroughly and I'm hoping for a really historic "That's funny .." moment!
That man was just so determined to walk again. I suppose only death could have stopped him.
They die young, whom the gods love best.
Yes, indeed. The pace of change is extraordinary these days.
Easily fast enough to cause confusion in some people's minds between 'e-VBLI' and the better known 'e-VLBI'!! (Sorry.)
Interestingly enough, at the age you mention - about 11 or 12 - I was scouring the local library in south London looking for science fiction novels. I found a series of fictional works by someone called Hugh Walters, with titles like 'Mission to Mercury', 'Destination Mars', and 'Journey to Jupiter'.
Even then, the seeds had somehow been sown!
Thank you, Cindy.
Great post! We can't sit around analysing 'ifs buts and maybes' any longer.
:bars:
Hi SpaceNut.
Your point is well taken. At the risk of boring you and others who have heard me spout this stuff before, Earth's climatic history is much more varied than most people give it credit for. Technically, we're in an ice-age, which is broadly defined as any period during which a permanent ice cap exists at either pole.
Ice-ages are relatively transient things, in geological time frames. For most of Earth's history, there have been no ice caps at the poles. So, to have one polar cap is relatively rare; to have ice caps at both poles at the same time is even rarer!
They've found the remains of dinosaurs in polar regions which today are frozen barren places, subjected to long dark polar nights. While these finds reflect a degree of physiological diversity and adaptability in dinosaurs we hadn't suspected up until quite recently, that and other evidence tells us Earth's poles were once far less forbidding than they are today.
This brings us to your thoughts on where the present-day extremophile organisms near the poles came from. Your conjecture makes good sense to me. I think it quite likely that such microbes have been there, gradually adapting to the cold, since more clement times.
And I agree that it would be interesting to do DNA analyses to try to determine their origins.
Hi Julius.
I agree with your summary of how life's development, if any, may have progressed on early Mars. There are many unanswered questions, though, as to how long the climate remained amenable to life and how often more benign conditions may have returned, for limited periods, later in the piece. This kind of research is one of my main interests.
But we need to factor in impact transfer of crustal material between the inner planets, too. I believe viable bacteria have been transferred from Earth to Mars, and vice versa, throughout the last 3.5 billion years at least. Such transfer has been added to in recent decades by the arrival on Mars of unsterilised probes from the Soviet Union and incompletely sterilised ones from America and the ESA.
The inner rocky planets are not quarantined from one another.
I'm surprised it's taken them this long to organise e-VBLI. After all, the internet is hardly a new phenomenon, even to mildly technophobic computer illiterates like me!
Still, better late than never. And maybe just in the nick of time if that supernova blows tomorrow.
"Ultraviolent."
!!! :laugh:
Nice twist of a word to suit the occasion.
Interesting article too.
A warm welcome to New Mars, PeterJ.
A nice agenda for Mars, in my view, though one or two of the legal eagles here might want to modify the terminology and flesh it out a bit.
Have you joined The Mars Society yet? If not, check out their website at http://www.marssociety.org]www.marssociety.org and give it some thought. The more members a space advocacy group has, the more influential it is. And we need as much influence as we can get!
And another thing ... !
I've noticed Josh putting inverted commas around the word "insurgents" and Stu has gone to some lengths to point out the kinds of words used by Western journalists to describe Islamic extremists.
I would like to add my two cents worth here as well.
The ABC and SBS T.V. networks here in Australia have taken to calling the terrorists anything but terrorists and murderers, which I agree with Stu is what they really are. We now get the softer euphemisms like 'insurgents', 'rebels', hostage takers', 'fighters', 'militants', etc.
These terms carry with them the implicit and almost subliminal message that somehow the terrorists have some kind of legitimate cause for which they're fighting. They haven't, of course, but we Australians are being fed a monotonous diet of subtle misinformation to that effect (I don't know if it goes on to the same extent in other countries).
But why? I can't fathom what SBS or the ABC is hoping to achieve by backing the wrong side. Even assuming you hate America or American foreign policy, even assuming you disapproved of the Iraq war, even if you have a dozen alternative histories you might have preferred to see happen, where is the percentage now in undermining the Coalition forces? Could it possibly be that the people running these two Australian T.V. networks actually wish for the liberation of Iraq to fail, for the forces of militant Islamic extremists to succeed in derailing the process of democratisation? Can they possibly be so determined to damage Western liberal democracy that they would aid and abet the cause of Islamofascism to achieve that goal?
Hmmm. In this case, I have to say that even I DonGetIt!
:bars:
Brilliant! I'd never heard of this concept before. (In this context, I mean.)
And, although we have no experience of deploying such large membranes and getting them to fly in formation with photographic equipment thousands of kilometres away, the set-up is potentially much cheaper than a conventional Hubble-type telescopic camera.
In view (excuse the pun! ) of the potential returns of detailed imaging data from up to 100 light years away, it must surely be worth pursuing.
Great stuff!
Rik:-
... rants about Siamese Twin Alien Heads on Mars!
And Cindy:-
"Oh, here we go; I can see the tabloid headlines now: 'Fossilized remains of two-headed tortoise found on Mars!'" :laugh:
Just thought I'd let you guys know, I laughed out loud at that little exchange between you! Just beautiful!! :laugh:
Great photo, too. Thanks for the laugh and the picture.
To borrow a little from CC's post, DonPanic you DonGetIt!
And I'm not even going to attempt to explain it to you. If you've read everything that's been posted here at New Mars in recent months, and still carry on with the views you've just outlined, then I guess the gulf is just too wide between us.
Some of you here probably know of John Howard, the Australian Prime Minister who sent Aussie troops out to Afghanistan and Iraq on the first available boats, to fight alongside British and American soldiers.
Well, let me tell you, that man has been harried, pilloried, vilified, and had pins stuck into little effigies that look just like him(! ), by the Australian media, ever since the Iraq invasion. Fortunately, the media attacks have been seen by the Australian people for the shameless political exercise that they were.
John Howard was re-elected Prime Minister last night, with a substantially increased majority, and may well gain control of the Senate too.
I'm glad to be able to report that the majority of Australians apparently DoGetIt !!
:up:
Cindy:-
There's a point of soul contamination people should avoid, IMO. ... I don't want anything of THAT in me.
I agree with this sentiment wholeheartedly - well chosen words. The censored parts of the video are quite enough for me to be able to get a glimmering of what those poor men must have gone through.
As I've said, I have no intention of listening to terrified men pleading piteously for their lives and then watching as they're slaughtered without mercy. There's such a thing as too much information.
Thank you, Stu, for your typically descriptive post about your feelings in all this. I don't think it's any secret that you are very well regarded here at New Mars, not only for your excellent writing but for your obvious intelligence and good nature.
In view of this, I was almost relieved to find that your opinions and mine, with regard to the whole Islamofascist problem, are in close agreement. 'Relieved' sounds like the wrong word in this context, of course, since it seems incongruous to be relieved about anything in the face of such a burgeoning calamity.
Only a relatively few people at New Mars seem to see the present world situation in quite the same way as I (we) see it. To me, it appears self-evident that a socio-religious virus has infected the world, in the form of extremist Islam. I've been trying to say that this problem is not an academic one and playing the blame game won't make it go away. Whether you imagine capitalism is the culprit (it isn't) or that America is to blame for everything (it isn't), or whether you want to sit down and beat your own breast just because you're a Westerner and we're all guilty in the West (we're not), will make no difference. The terrorists don't care.
Stu, you've suggested it's way past time for the main body of Islam thoroughly to denounce the murderers in its midst. I certainly agree with that and I know others here have expressed the same opinion. It doesn't look like it's going to happen, though; if it were ever going to, it should have happened by now.
I'm like you in another way, too. I wake up every morning and turn on the T.V. with more than a little trepidation. I've been fearing the same kind of news you mentioned - a 'dirty' bomb in Washington DC, mains water biologically contaminated in London, maybe something even worse ... .
I don't know what can be done about it either and I fear you're right about a potential religious war, which is probably what these psychopaths want from us. Taking the war to them seems to be the only option open to us and that's why I have supported the liberation of Afghanistan and Iraq - a sometimes difficult path to take around these parts!
Anyhow, thanks for a great post!
Ah, I see, MarsDog.
I didn't realise there was actual evidence to suggest that tit-for-tat kidnapping and mutilation of terrorists' relatives is effective in preventing further kidnappings. I see the method in your 'madness' now.
I'm afraid, though, that the terrorists might wait and see how far the West would actually go in this direction. We might send them a testicle, an ear, even a surgically removed kidney, but what if they were to call our bluff and wait out the situation, to see whether we have what they would cynically call the 'guts' to actually execute the relative on T.V.?
And then there's Josh's point about Western moral standards. He is quite right, of course, that we see a difference between collateral damage and deliberate brutal execution of innocent people. My point of view, for what it may be worth, is that we can't do what they do. I cannot condone the mutilation and execution of innocents who just happen to be related to a barbarian.
As an aside, I note the continual emphasis, on Australian SBS news in particular, on the deaths of civilian Iraqis in besieged towns full of terrorists. The reports mention the deaths of scores of innocent Iraqis in car bombings but rarely show pictures of the carnage. Large sections of the news slot, though, are taken up with images of the civilians accidentally killed by Coalition attacks on terrorist strongholds.
The bias is unmistakable. Accidental deaths caused by the Coalition are apparently of far more importance than the greater numbers of civilian deaths caused quite deliberately by terrorists. This political agenda in journalism is disturbing, at least to me, and stands in stark contrast to an earlier time when news reporting was even-handed, just the facts.
The deaths of innocent civilians are inevitable, of course, when the terrorists choose to mix in with the general populace in the residential areas of towns. These terrorists show their true colours in their cynicism toward the safety of their fellow Muslims. They are indeed the worst kind of cowardly scum and civilian Iraqis in these towns should organise themselves and rise up against these murderers who are trying to deny them a free and democratic Iraq. Then again, I suppose any attempt by ordinary citizens at arresting terrorists and presenting them to the Coalition would be met with brutal reprisals - they daren't try it.
In the meantime, the relentless propaganda against the armed forces of Britain, America, and Australia goes on unabated. They are a magnificent body of troops doing a very difficult job in the fight for freedom and civilisation. Some of them may soon be pushing on into Iran and Syria, as and when the U.N. locks horns with Tehran over its nuclear program. I think they deserve our support and gratitude in their efforts to make the world a safer place.
They certainly have my backing.
:up:
A very sad day, indeed, Josh.
I don't envy your having watched this sick barbarity - I couldn't have looked at it myself.
I very much understand your attitude, MarsDog; there are times when I'm overtaken by similar emotions of revenge. I don't believe we should do the same to the relatives of these savages, though.
Situations like these only make me all the more determined that we should do whatever it takes to hunt down and execute terrorists, wherever they may be. I can't begin to tell you how I feel about these ignorant monsters, most of whom know nothing except the Koran and mindless religious hatred. The thought of ordinary peaceful men dying so horribly and so unnecessarily at the hands of these swine is just too much to bear.
:bars2:
Excellent pictures!
I now have a new desktop. :up:
I notice that all the dark sand/dust which appears in these hollows and chasms is always exactly where intuition tells you you might expect to find water if these low areas were on Earth. The shape and elevation of the dark patches is uncannily like what you would expect if the dark sand were in fact water. You never see it on raised ground or on slopes - always at the lowest points in the topography.
Interesting ... ???
I wonder if these dark patches were actually associated with former lakes and ponds in some way. Could they be somehow associated with water even today? Why doesn't the ubiquitous red dust, found everywhere on Mars, settle in these low areas and obscure the dark sand? Could it be that the areas are dark because of a still extant water table keeping the soil wetter and darker?
I really have no idea what I'm talking about - just airing a few rambling thoughts.
Thanks Cindy. Glad to see the MERS are receiving their more than justified recognition as probably the most successful space probes of all time.
:up:
There's an interesting article http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2004/oc … .html]HERE which indicates that water has altered virtually all the rocks examined by the rovers so far. The evidence points to at least some of the rocks having been wet more than once, too, and more investigations are ongoing to determine just how much water may have been involved.
I just hope Spirit's mobility can be maintained long enough to answer some of the questions raised by all this. I don't like the sound of all this arthritis creeping into the wheels and joints etc.
I'm not sure if this has been posted elsewhere but it gives a very detailed account of how the Huygens mission was saved by a Swede called Boris Smeds.
http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/WEBONLY/pu … html]CLICK HERE
That was a damned fine rant, Cindy!
And, as a recognised ranter from way back, I feel I'm in a pretty good position to say that with some considerable authority. The fact is, I agree with every word and couldn't have ranted it better myself!
:rant: [ ]
Someone here in Australia once asked: "What's going to happen when the last few people who actually give a damn finally stop caring?"
This may represent a slightly jaundiced view of life but it definitely takes on renewed meaning when you see reports like this.
I'm pretty sure I've mentioned this before but I remember reading (in Andrew Chaikin's 'A Man On The Moon', I think, though I can't seem to find it now) about one of the Apollo 'mechanics' back in the glory days. An astronaut, looking over a Saturn V at night just prior to one of the Moon missions, was surprised to find one of the workers still checking things long after everyone else had gone home. When asked what he was doing there so late, he said something to this effect: "If this mission fails, it sure isn't going to be because of me!"
In my mind, this sums up the attitude of that breed of American scientists, engineers, and technicians who made things happen back in the sixties. The U.S.A. was rightly famous back then for the 'can-do' mentality which never yielded to problems. Problems were seen only as opportunities to come up with ingenious solutions.
I think Burt Rutan may be one of the last examples of that kind of thinking and I can't tell you how much I admire that man for getting the job done and getting it done right!
:up:
I think we all need to work towards encouraging people to "give a damn" again. 'Close enough' isn't 'good enough'; we need more attention to detail, if you ask me.
:hm:
[ :rant: ... end of rant! :laugh: ]
HAPPY BIRTHDAY ROBS !!!!!!!
:band:
Hope you've enjoyed the first half of your life ... !
(I'm approaching the half-way mark myself.)
I second Rik's thanks for all you've done to make New Mars the best Mars board this side of the galactic "Great Wall". Long may you prosper!
[P.S. A belated "Happy Birthday" to those I've neglected to congratulate lately. I get distracted occasionally. :bars: ]
This is a remarkable tour-de-force. Your narrative has a very natural 'feel' to it, flowing smoothly and readably, while simultaneously retaining that authority and wealth of detail which can only come from an intimate knowledge of the subject matter. I've found myself transported back to the late eighteenth century very effectively.
I can't recall if you've ever mentioned publishing it but, if not, maybe you should give it some thought. If any one of your talents outshines the rest, this kind of writing must surely be it!
Many thanks, Cindy! :up:
Hmmm.
Maybe I have been overestimating the MSL's capabilities or intended range somewhat. But the chances of it being "trapped" in some of the chaotic terrain RobS mentions must surely be greater in Mariner Valley than the chances at, say, Meridiani.
Not that I have anything against setting it down in Marineris; in fact, I think it would be a great spot for science and I'm sure it must be possible to find relatively safe landing ellipses there. After all, it's a fairly big valley .. !
Brilliantly done!
Thanks very much, Intuition, for giving us the privilege of a sneak preview. Hope you don't get into trouble over it.
[I can't believe I've managed to view the trailer - I usually have trouble getting damned computers to do anything much!
Cindy, I know you have reservations about Dr. Zubrin and the more gung-ho attitudes to space exploration/exploitation. I'm a little concerned that you might find this creation just a little 'over the top' for your tastes(?).
Suits me down to the ground, though!! ]