You are not logged in.
Well well! Another Elvis fan, eh?
Trebuchet:-
Hey, if there's oil on Mars, that's very useful *on Mars*. Plastics, synthetic rubber, tar for making macadam roads...
Good point, Treb! :up:
I was just concentrating on what I perceived to be Ian's enthusiasm for lunar and Martian oil as a replacement for West Texas Crude here on Earth! Not a practical proposition, I think.
A terribly sad tale about that poor young woman being raped by that excuse for a human-being. I'm not nearly as squeamish about the death penalty as many others here and I just found one more to add to my list - along with all child molesters everywhere. ( :bars2: ) I can tell you right now, if I'd seen that appalling disgrace happening and I'd had a rifle handy, that bast*** wouldn't be bothering anyone ever again.
And this shame on the female victim crap .. I'll never understand that BS! Instead of the relatives hiding the poor girl away, they should be out looking for the cur that attacked her. And they should maybe take a rope with them, too. :realllymad:
No, Cindy. I can't help you with the desalination thing on the Abraham Lincoln. If it's a nuclear-powered vessel, they probably have energy to spare for such things but I don't know much about it. I'm sure someone here will know.
The Australian people have breached the $100 million mark, and still rising - great stuff! And now our government has pledged $1 billion in total aid, to be spent over the next 5 years, for Indonesia alone. There will be other aid to other countries, too, I believe. But Indonesia caught the brunt of the disaster and Australia is her nearest neighbour.
Plus, we were among the first aid-workers to arrive at some of the devastated sites and the Aussie naval vessel, HMAS Kanimbla, with heavy-lift helicopters on board and laden with supplies, is on its way to help as we speak.
I am extremely pleased and proud of my country's efforts, even though it's no more than our neighbours have a right to expect from us at such a time.
Again, I draw attention to the American efforts also. As she has always done, these past hundred years, the United States has stepped up to the plate in fine style to help those in need. I'm very impressed that the Abraham Lincoln was so quickly on the scene. And what a magnificent job she's been doing, too!
I don't give a Good-God-Damn what the detractors and left-wing loonies have to say about America, you're not just a Superpower .. you're a super Power! Your politicians often let you down badly (we all have that lousy problem, in any democracy) but you're a big country with big-hearted people and I'm more than happy to call you all 'cousins'.
[Cindy, you raised fears about future tsunamis affecting the east coast of Australia and that maybe we should keep some cash in the kitty to save our own a**es in case of such an eventuality.
The most likely cause of a major tsunami in the Pacific is a submarine landslide in the Hawaiian Islands. Apparently there's evidence that a previous slide caused a mega-tsunami which produced a wave 500 metres high on one of those islands!
By the time such a wave reached Australia, it would still reach a height of some 50 metres at the shoreline, destroying most of the infrastructure on our eastern seaboard. If that happened, a billion dollars one way or the other wouldn't save Australia from an economic meltdown of apocalyptic proportions. Especially since a similar wave would simultaneously take out most of America's western seaboard - pulverising cities like San Diego, San Francisco, and Los Angeles.
We'll just have to cross that bridge when we come to it.]
Scott Beach:-
President Harry S. Truman had the courage to end and win the Second World War as soon as nuclear bombs were available. George Bush could have eliminated whatever threat Iraq posed to the United States without losing the life of even one American soldier. Instead, George Bush chose to feed thousands of Americans into a meat grinder. George Bush is a coward.
You know, Scott, I'm pretty sure one of us is crazy ...
Or we're back to that nice little experiment in cage-rattling again. Seriously though, what are you doing these days, old man, writing a thesis for a degree or something?
Let's not get too excited over oil on the Moon or Mars etc.
Oil's no good unless you can burn its derivatives in oxygen, which means shipping it home to Earth. While this is perhaps theoretically feasible in some future world, you have to bear in mind the phenomenal costs involved in doing that.
Anyone for gas at, say, $2,000,000 a gallon? :laugh:
Yeah, maybe I am being premature with that observation.
It might be just frustration with the slowness of news in the departments that interest me most - a selfish viewpoint (.. and I was a little weary when I wrote it).
Sheesh, I'm so frustrated with the lack of scientific evaluations coming out of NASA re. the MERs' data that I'm starting to see arthropods in Martian rock crevices!!
:laugh:
Looks like New Mars might have started a slow winding down in activity.
While it used to be a case of "New Mars is still a young site", now the explanation for the low posting rate might be "New Mars is an ageing site"! (Or am I being premature in my judgment?)
???
Still, I suppose all good things must come to an end and New Mars is no different; nothing lasts forever, I guess
Scott Beach is a social engineer from way back. Nothing wrong with that, of course; it's a free country.
My first impression of his interesting and blatantly outrageous introduction to this thread was that it was some kind of deliberate experiment. You know .. put the lab rats into a new maze and see who can run it the fastest. As I indicated at the beginning, the premise of Scott's argument, coming from an ostensibly intelligent man, is so crass and filled with illogic that it simply can't have been anything else.
It still looks that way from where I'm sitting, though I admit I may be mistaken.
If my interpretation does happen to be correct, then it seems the little experiment may have had the expected outcome.
Well, Scott? Did it? :;):
[DISCLAIMER: I do not categorise as a "lab rat" anyone who responded in any way to Scott's poll. The term was used only to illustrate a point and no offence against any New Mars contributor was intended.]
Incidentally, I assume I could have become part of the data derived from the purported experiment, since I was the first to respond to it. And now, I'm making things worse in adding more data by whingeing about the thread a second time!!
:laugh:
A pointless poll based on contrived and simplistic logic, in my opinion.
[Oh, and just what we need, too ... another thread designed to give Bushophobes more excuses to air their pathology.
Even the hardened political debaters at New Mars, with the exception of one or two diehards, have grown weary of that particular fray, Scott. ]
I find it interesting that from above, the view is similar to the cratered surface on the moon. But at the MER’s level, I don’t see moonlike craters, just hollows. The view from MER looks very Earthlike.
That very same thought crossed my mind just the other day!
CM:-
Crabs on Mars! Oh no!
Well, now that we're forewarned, it shouldn't be much of a problem. We'll just have the first crews bring a supply of permethrin shampoo. It'll clear that right up...
No no no, CM.
Not that kind of crab!
On a marginally more serious note, I've been wondering about possible metabolic arrangements which would allow a creature such as an arthropod to survive on Mars. This train of thought serves two purposes. First, it enables me to justify my seeing live crabs in Mars pictures ( :;): ), and second, it allows me to conjure up what I think of as interesting scenarios of Mars' past.
To begin with, you have to speculate that Martian life gained a foothold long ago, either as an indigenous process or courtesy of impact transfers from Earth. Then, I suppose, you have to assume the production of an oxygen-rich atmosphere and the rise of multi-cellular animal life.
Next comes the atmospheric loss and dessication of Mars, which would have presumably killed off much of the diversity of flora and fauna in a way reminiscent of, though much worse than, Earth's Permian extinction event of 250 million years ago.
What kinds of creatures might have survived? Perhaps armoured ones which were able to burrow and survive the gradually worsening environment. Perhaps very small ones, able to subsist on very little in a nutrient-poor world.
Perhaps small arthropods!!
But how would an oxygen breathing arthropod survive the almost total disappearance of oxygen from the Martian atmosphere?
Is there any way a small crab-like creature, living mainly in damp briny sand and rock crevices, could form some kind of symbiotic relationship with anaerobic bacteria to get oxygen? After all, we humans depend almost entirely on symbiosis with our gut bacteria for the digestion of our food, and it's believed even our energy-producing cellular organelles, called mitochondria, are actually highly modified foreign bacteria assimilated into multi-cellular animals hundreds of millions of years ago.
Do we have any biochemists here who could imagine a broadly similar symbiotic mechanism whereby anaerobes could supply sufficient oxygen to maintain the physiology of small, slow-moving, crab-like creatures on Mars? ???
Just a few thoughts.
I seem to remember a report last week that about 400 fishing boats were missing from the east coast of India(?). But there were so many confusing reports at the time it's hard to know if that report was accurate - and does "missing" necessarily mean destroyed? I never noticed a follow-up to that one.
I'm proud to say, the last time I heard, Aussies had privately raised $83 million in donations for the relief effort. That total is still rising and I think it may have stung the government, who were only promising about $65 million in aid, because there's now talk of Australia providing $500 million.
I certainly hope the rumour is true because we're a wealthy country and can afford to be generous in the face of all that suffering among our poorer neighbours.
I believe the U.S. has offered $450 million so far and I note the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln was among the first on the scene, using its helicopters to distribute food etc.
Well done, America!
Always there to help in an emergency. :up:
I predict that America will first of all be blamed for the shift in the Earth's crust that caused the tsunami. Then, when it becomes impossible to make the accusation stick, she will be denigrated for not doing enough to warn everybody it was happening, and then castigated for not doing enough to help those affected.
It wouldn't make any difference if America donated $50 billion, of course; her detractors can never be satisfied.
:;):
The question of what becomes of neutron-star-stuff when it is freed of the great majority of the massive gravity which formed it, is an interesting one.
Is there any reason to believe that neutrons created by crushing together protons and electrons in a monstrous gravity well will somehow resume their former composition without the intense gravity? I've never come across any reference to such a thing happening, even in theory, and I doubt it would occur.
With only neutrons, and no protons or electrons, there can be no elements as we know them.
Neutrons stick together in atomic nuclei but that's in the presence of one or more protons. As Trebuchet suggests, I suspect a fragment of neutron star would dissipate in a shower of free neutrons.
???
[Unless the original information which described the atoms that were destroyed by gravity to make up the neutron-star-stuff, is somehow preserved at a quantum level within the material and re-emerges to spontaneously reconstruct the original atoms.
But I'm just speculating way out of my league here. ]
Never mind fossil brachiopod impressions in the rock!
You know how crabs create little burrows in sand at the beach and often leave little balls of sand piled up near the entrance? ???
Well, I think Spirit's latest 'microscopic' images have revealed similar tell-tale structures in a sandy-looking rock; evidently the work of small Martian arthropods.
If you look closely at this and (mainly) other photos in the same recent batch from Spirit, you can see the piles of sandballs at the entrances to the burrows and, wait for it, in this one you can even see one of the little 'crabs' or 'spiders' just inside his hidey-hole!
About 1/3rd of the way down from the top of the image, in the largest recess visible in this view of the rock, you can see the little multi-legged beastie, caught on camera.
Of course, some people will insist it's just a trick of the light and shadow but why would you want to believe that sort of explanation when you can have some of David Bowie's "..Spiders from Mars"?!!
Hi Rik!
MAY A THOUSAND BIRTHDAY BLESSINGS RAIN DOWN UPON YOU FROM THE HEAVENS !!!
:band:
[O.K., O.K. ... a little 'over the top', perhaps, but I think you deserve it and I enjoyed it! :laugh: ]
Cindy:-
Quote
Although we don't need a trip to the moon as part of a Mars program*That's right, we don't, so why bother?
Quote
I think that the "side trip" to the moon is important so NASA can overcome a mental hurdle.*I completely disagree. There's no "mental hurdle" to be overcome. They just need to get on with it.
Quote
As someone once said IIRC "I can't see us going directly to Mars after not leaving Earth orbit for 40 years".*So what? That's just another opinion. We left Earth orbit multiple times with Apollo. How much more practice do we need?
--Cindy
P.S.: We've having enough difficulty getting Congress to pony up the $ to pay for a Mars Direct type scenario. The chances they'll be willing to cough up even *more* $ for a "dry (practice) run" to Mars via the Moon? Nil.
I agree.
Hi Alan.
Can't remember if I welcomed you to New Mars or not. If not, sorry, and glad to have you aboard!
That photo you linked for us is very interesting; it looks like one of Saturn's moons has a seam running around it! I guess that's where the aliens joined the two halves together when they constructed it.
Hi again, CM.
Yes, I see your point. Lacking your experience in geology and fossil-hunting, I fell into the trap of pouncing on the first example of a brachiopod picture I found, which wasn't very helpful.
The example you give is much more in keeping with the formation apparent in the Mars rock and makes for a much stronger case.
In fact, I'm surprised (again!) that NASA has made no comment on what may have produced it. Unless they're so much smarter than any of us poor plebs and have dismissed the rock as an uninteresting product of volcanism or some such(?).
???
Dear Josh,
This is an unexpected blow to us all at New Mars.
I think we've had a few disagreements over the years but nothing which could ever seriously stand between us. I am genuinely saddened to hear you may be away for some time and I join the others in wishing and hoping that you'll keep us in mind and come back to us as soon as you possibly can.
New Mars can't afford to be losing too many people of your obvious wit and intelligence. ???
I was very touched by your kind words about me in your last post and I'll be thinking fondly of you in your absence. Thanks for everything you've done for all of us and especially for me.
Hoping to seeya soon ol' buddy.
Actually, the more I look at the highest resolution picture of the RAT-ted area, the more it looks like some of the depressions in the rock have something smooth in them.
In fact, it almost looks like someone has smeared putty in the holes; in one case, near the centre of the picture, the 'putty' looks smeared from inside an irregular-shaped hole, up and out of the hole toward the right side of the image. It's not impossible, looking at the picture, to imagine a flatworm crawling out of the depression in the rock - looking rather like this shape:-
By the way, I'm NOT saying I think Mars rocks really have something like flatworms crawling around in them now, or that they contain fossils of long-dead flatworms. And I don't imagine there are demented Martian carpenters going around filling rock vesicles with linseed-oil putty, either(! ). I'm just using these analogies to better describe the shapes I think I can see.
It certainly is an interesting rock and I wish it were possible to examine it in greater detail. But, like so many other things we've seen on Mars, it looks like we'll only ever be able to guess at what we might have missed in some of the rocks inspected so far.
Once again, the situation is crying out for humans on site to get down to the real nitty-gritty of exploration and scientific investigation. For all we know, we may have rolled right past rocks containing perfectly preserved fossils and missed the greatest discovery in history!!
???
Hi, CM.
I'm always on the lookout for a bit of sensible discussion about potential fossils in Martian rock.
I saw these images a few days ago and was very interested in them because at first glance they looked like they could be fossiliferous. But I couldn't see enough detail to be sure of what I was seeing, so I gave up and moved on - which is what I suspect the guys at NASA have done too.
I wasn't sure what you were trying to tell us so I looked up fossilised brachiopods and found this picture:-
Now I think I know what you were implying with the 'radial lines' suggestion, though I'm still having trouble at this level of resolution.
Another thing which I'm concerned about is the relative scale of these fossils - Mars (if they are fossils) versus Earth. My impression is the proposed Martian brachiopods must be absolutely tiny compared to the terrestrial version and this must mitigate against their being fossils.
Is this not so? ???
Cindy:-
This should have been top news, IMO, from the local and most popular TV station. But was it? Nooooooo. A football game (University of El Paso at Texas team) was given top priority -- headline news -- even over where locals can give cash donations to help the tsunami victims (mentioned above). The TV station even considered it "breaking news" that some football fans were suddenly without electricity and couldn't watch the game. Oh boo-hoo-hoo. That's more important than the tsunami victims (80,000 dead; more probably dead; thousands more missing; disease is already beginning to spread; all those folks without food, water, medicine, halfway decent sanitation; most with only the clothing on their backs) and aftermath?
I don't frickin' think so!!
I'll second that emotion!!! :realllymad:
We're bedevilled with sport-lunacy in Australia, too. ???
That's great news about the Cassini deflection manoeuvre. :up:
And Titan's flattened North Pole .. hmm .. fascinatinger and fascinatinger!!
What a year we've had!
Yeah, and what happens when these righteous guys and gals leave university, marry within their holy group, and produce .. wait for it .. homosexual offspring!! {GASP!}
:laugh:
Some people!
Refreshing is right! :up:
Mr. Zimmerman reminds us that "living is a life-shortening experience" and that space exploration isn't something that can be made risk-free any more than anything can be made risk-free.
Bravo, Robert!
In my opinion, he made a pretty good case for 1968 being more of a mess than 2004, too. Yet America took its chances and reached higher than anyone had ever tried before.
Bravo, America!
But this is no time for the U.S. to lose her nerve.
"We choose to go to Mars and do the other things, not because they are easy but because they are hard .."