You are not logged in.
Lo
Well, Bush or Kerry, there will come a time when troopers will be tired of Iraq, when US opinion will be tired paying billions bills for overarmament, will want the boys back,
When US travellers will want to be abble to travel the world along without being endangered just being Americans...
Then, even the most stutborn neocons will turn to Real Politic with no threat on friends.
LO
*I see your point. However, Iraqis "as a people" should make the decision to tear down the prison or leave it standing? Is there such a thing as Iraqi unity? The religious factions (some very intense), the tribal discord (pre-dating U.S. invasion), etc. Without wishing to sound arrogant or whatever, I doubt there is enough Iraqi unity currently, to decide as a nation. Which makes me cynical about other related issues...
I'm afraid that the more the occupation will last, the more Iraqis will unite against USA
Of course "they" would love to be in our shoes.
Sure not ! Iraqi shoes are tremendously expensive, undersized and hurt
That is why we must act in a way that does not give "them" incentive to unite against us.
By holding ourselves to a higher moral standard (no "Abu Ghraibs", whether or not we suffer "Nick Bergs" we can better persuade the average non-American that our power does not threaten them.
Otherwise, we will face world coalitions forming against us to take away our shoes, so to speak.
Looks obvious that UNO will back USA only if US administration agrees with an every 6 monthes renewable mandate for the troops.
By now, none of the US claims that invading Iraq wasn't led by Oil greed is trust worthy.
That's not "higher moral standard" behaviour, but pure cynism
LO
Democracy in Iraq is supposed to be what Iraqis choose to destroy or to build up, either, it's US diktat
LO
Bushs]http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1521&e=1&u=/afp/20040527/pl_afp/iraq_us_prison_pentagon_040527133734]Bushs]http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1521&e=1&u=/afp/20040527/pl_afp/iraq_us_prison_pentagon_040527133734]Bushs]http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1521&e=1&u=/afp/20040527/pl_afp/iraq_us_prison_pentagon_040527133734]Bush's surprise announcement
*I'd say this is a positive idea with a "Bastille-like" flair.
--Cindy
Good intention, but another awkwardness : looks like another masters' decision taken out of Iraqi's consulting. Not the good way to make Iraqis feel free.
Why don't ask Iraqis if these buildings cannot be reshaped at any useful aim such as an university, housing program, dockhouses ?
That does it DomPanic! Enough is enough!
If the friggin' EU intends to eradicate junk food - this means war!
As weapons, I choose tomatoes ( with half an onion, olive oil, a little fresh lemon juice, a little garlic, thyme, basil, tarragon, mustard, three slices of goat milk cheese, salt and pepper, and a quarter of a baguette just taken out of the oven)
En Garde, l'ami :;):
LO
Huh, US invading US ? Well....
The example was meant from the perspective of an third-world nation.
You could refer to the perspective of the South invaded by Yankees, for instance.
I told you the frogs know they're the center of the universe, right? Well, I didn't realize just how far this actually goes with them. You see, they now know that the universe is shaped like their landmarks too!
If you give me a paper and a pencil, and memory sketch, sure I will draw a France centered map of the world, but unlike many american students who will just draw a coast to coast map, mine will be quite correct depicting the whole world.
We know that center of Europe has moved to Germany, and, by the way, our way of life is somehow closer to NY's one than to Varsaw's. We actualy have the same gay marriage debates as you.
In Fallujah, the Marines just showed a brilliant appreciation of psyops in 4GW. How? They let the Iraqis win.
At the tactical level, the Marines probably could have taken Fallujah, although the result would have been a strategic disaster. Instead, by pulling back and letting the Iraqis claim victory, they gave Iraqi forces of order inside the city the self-respect they needed to work with us. Washington and the CPA seem to define "liberation" as beating the Iraqis to a pulp, then handing them their "freedom" like a gift from a master to a slave. In societies where honor, dignity and manliness are still important virtues, that can never work. But "losing to win" sometimes can.
Discovering ancient precepts of chinese strategic books ?
"Never totally surround your ennemies, they will figth like tigers,
let them an escape door, they will disband"
"If you have a total win, give back an inch of your gains,
you will get PEACE only if your ennemy can claim for a victory"
LO
Do you deny to one people the right to rule his homeland his own and to revolt against foreign military pressure ?
With regards to Israel/Palestine, who's 'homeland' it is is largely a question of how far back one chooses to look.
A Bible, hold by Varsaw, Brooklyn or Paris Jews cannot stand for a property bill on Palestine. If you look too far back, you should give back all America to native Americans
LO
So terrorism is okay if it's against Israel ?
To my eyes, each attack against civilians is terrorism,
when Israeli soldiers in occupied territories are blasted by an human bomb, this is self defense.
Do you deny to one people the right to rule his homeland his own and to revolt against foreign military pressure ?
We don't know that facts.
The most shocking photos were not to be released up to avoid endangering the troopers... that's supposed to be worse than any ethic minded US citizen can expect, weaken war effort support and feed Iraqis' rage
If we just leave, Iraq will not be free.
(Should I want to keep occupation for long, this is exactly what I would say...)
If Iraqis see you as an occupier, they will not be free, either.
Logic trap. That may lead to enlisement.
The situation needs to be finessed. Carrot and stick. Unless we suddenly feel like "Total War."
Aye aye Dr. Strangelove !
Do you advertise on your possible release of total barbarity ?
Remember the name of the last german chancellor to support "Total War" ?
Since when do Arab governments care about NON-Arabs getting killed? I've yet to see Arab gov'ts (perhaps with the exception of Jordan) "vehemently condemning" the deaths of non-Arabs. And why would they? We're "satanic infidels," after all, who deserve to die -- to their minds.
Please, don't generalise this way, liberal muslim Arabs too are targets for terrorists.
Much less than one Arab out of 10000 may become a terrorist.
By the way, latest Arab Summit condemned all terrorists acts, quite late, but did.
In the jordanian streets, peoples don't say any better about USA than in Syria, mainly hostile words.
LO
The whole waste of the Iraq affair, because of the stupid blindness of Bush's administration, its feeling of absolute military power and its greed for oil, is that they didn't understood that the pro Western party in Iraq was the Baath. The Baathists wanted to build a modern country against the fundies and terrorists.
Except for that nagging tendency to give support to terrorists.
Saddam supported terrorism at Israel, true, but never commited or supported any terrorist attack at any other Western country, and mainly not USA, remember, USAF patroled every day over Iraq, retaliation would have been so easy.
But is it really outside the realm of possibility that a wedding party fired on US troops?
Iraqi wedding parties are not worth without shooting at US troops, it's their sense of entertainment
this is well known the world overOh, shooting at someone for entertainment is okay?
Sorry you didn't see that was humour
Or we can impose modernity and freedom on them.
Imposed freedom ? By force ? How can you call that freedom ?
May be your sense of humour ?
LO
BGD, Trebuchet talked about irritation, not hate, this is understandable, if USA was to wait till Europeans stop tchating in all the languages they have, before an agreement, USA might wait for years... while USA can speed up ...taking the wrong track
LO
1) Actually, poll results - nonUS polling, for the suspicious - reveals that a majority of the Iraqis want the US to stay. At least until the situation dies down.
I'm suspicious, cite sources
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/04/ … poll/]Iraq poll BEFORE prisonners mistreatment scandal
LO
The whole waste of the Iraq affair, because of the stupid blindness of Bush's administration, its feeling of absolute military power and its greed for oil, is that they didn't understood that the pro Western party in Iraq was the Baath. The Baathists wanted to build a modern country against
the fundies and terrorists
Saddam was a monster indeed, but the regime was an ennemy of Bin Laden, there were free haired young women studying in Iraqi universities, they sure were not madrassases.
Thank to US military pressure, the regime had softened, it had comply with WMD disarmament, that's nobody can still deny.
It was possible to lead to more soft a regime by threat without loosing one american and that many thousands Iraqi lifes. That way was supported by rest of the world outside coalition.
And the alternative is... what? Have an election, go home and call it a win?
Done, you're a bit late, Bush has already called it a win...
You can't go into a country, topple a totalitarian regime and expect that overnight a republic can be dropped in with a pre-fab constitution and a few ballot boxes.
The ballot boxes should have been brought one year ago, but numerically would lead to an "islamic republic".
"We go to Iraq, topple Saddam, install a democratic regime, cheered by so grateful Iraqis"
That's exactly what Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld sold out to US opinion !
For the record, the Iraqi Governing Council changed the flag,
Aren't they US valets ? Who named them ? Who gives them the money ?
But is it really outside the realm of possibility that a wedding party fired on US troops?
Iraqi wedding parties are not worth without shooting at US troops, it's their sense of entertainment :;):
this is well known the world over
LO
*What bothers me the most about this scandal is the fact that it seems to prove the global assertion that the U.S. is a big, mean bully.
--Cindy
Don't worry, by now, about 40% among you are still welcome,
and we'll proud to share the best we have with you,
Xcept if you are a big, mean bully, I don't think so
LO
What was done at Abu Ghraib was a series of war crimes. Punishments should be swift and severe. But let's be clear, we are fighting an enemy with no respect for our lives. For our own sake and for the war effort, this stuff cannot be allowed.
Who are you at war against by now ?
Shiites wanting the end of occupation ? Sunnis wanting the end of occupation ? Iraqis wanting the end of occupation ?
It's 90% of them. They hate you, that's all. 10 % can be turned, so what ?
What about your pretention to free Iraq ? When I read you, CC, I cannot believe a one second that you want any good to Iraqis ! You are just occupying a country against its will.
Did they allow you to change their flag ?
When I see that Kimmitt claiming no wedding party was bombed by mistake, I have not any trust in any so called US goodwill at Iraq, only goodwill against Iraq, dig it ?
LO
I have learned, with the greatest relief, that Iraqi prisonners will not be submited any more to 72 hours of loud bluegrass music,
which is among the most shocking experiences a non american folk can endure. ???
LO
Britain won't attack us. France...
We're too weak, we can wipe USA out of the maps only ONCE while you can kill all of us hundreds of times
We got to have some ammunitions left for some other threat, to protect our vitrified deads
By the way, to strike terrorists nests, we have a stockpile of small Neutrons bombs that wipe out any life in a range of 3 square miles whithout any material damage, U interested ? ???
We have Corsican cheeses too, but they aren't allowed by Geneva convention on Armaments, as inhumane weapons
LO
Fun pause among strategic nuke plans
LO
Wrestling with monsters...
Got deepest doubts about who's a monster
LO
I have no doubt that any decision rendered by stoned village eldars would seem fair -- to anyone accustomed to the Napoleonic Code of justice. Off with their heads! Let them eat cake! (OK, that pastry moment was good old Marie, not Napoleon, but you have to see my point: guilty until proven innocent? Go ahead, prove a negative. I dare ya!)
D'you alcootest Courts, lawyers and jury members ? ???
May be you've got to up to date your knowledge of french justice.
Nowadays suspects aren't to be called suspects, but "set under investigations"...
Unlike in your country, penalty of death is abolished, killing means by Justice are in museums, therefore we do not take the risk to send back a corpse to innocent's families.
May be the Frenchies are among the less clerical peoples in the world, maybe they dismiss any reference to Christianhood in Europeean Constitution, may be they have not written "In God We Trust" over banknotes, nevertheless, their Justice admits God's Commandment "Thou Shall Not Kill"
Related, the rest of the world more actively conspires to contain our power than they did 4 years ago.
Chirac, Putin and Schroeder are rapidly becoming good buddies because of American policy.
Result of cons ideology of "Good against Evil" and "who is'nt with US is against US", if not scared by such a simplism, they would be disputing at each other, as usual...
In the space realm, Soyuz at Kouru is a mind blowing development.
Froggies took opportunity to cheap bargain half of Soyuz launchers production from a ruined russian space industry, acting diplomaticly like partners and not like bosses
LO
Anybody up to being tried in a world court system packed with judges from Communist China and advocates of Sharia Law?
Interesting times . . .
I saw a TV reportage on a Yemenite village council, imagine a hall with village leaders and a crowd of people chewing khat, smoking narguilees, tchating, and then they had to judge a man who had killed his neighbour after arguing and hand fighting.
The man told he didn't intend to kill, nevertheless the village old leaders sentenced him to death.
Then the victim's wife stood up, said that the murderer's death wouldn't give her back her husband, that she was left alone with three children and that she wasn't not strong enough to cultivate,
that the murderer had a wife and children that would be left without ressources, too.
Therefore she wished that the murderer should be sentenced to cultivate for her and her children half of each day of his life, cultivate for his own family the other half.
After a short discussion, the village jury agreed on the woman's request.
I don't know if this is yemenite or Sharia justice, what you think of it, but it seemed to me as quite a fair trial and a real good decision
LO
Each brutal crush leads to more uprising.
Quote (Cobra Commander @ May 13 2004, 09:30)
Historically this just isn't true. An occupied people can only take so much before they buckle under. temporarily, perhaps, but it works.Doesn't work for Palestine,
This is another case where the effort is restrained. Not to the degree of the US forces in Iraq, it but the Israelis are being held back. They are taking half measures. If the leash was ever dropped and they were free to do what many in the Israeli government think needs to be done...
What would be your brilliant full measures ? If Israelis wanted to get rid of Palestinians who want them out of occupied territories, genociding or exoding Palestinians is the full measure.
Your problem is :we, we, we, you think US, you don't think iraqi, as far as I can see, and you need to think iraqi to deal with Iraqis.
I think in terms of what we need to do in order to win the support of some Iraqis, while killing the insurgents.
I see. Get Free n' Democratised my way or die...
Quote (ecrasez_l_infame @ May 15 2004, 07:52)
I'm wondering of any of our non-U.S. New Mars participants would be so kind as to tell me why, if you were a U.S. citizen, you WOULD vote for John Kerry instead of Bush. Why do you think Kerry would make a better U.S. President?
I'll refine the question a bit more. Can any Kerry supporter explain why they support him, without referring to George Bush? We know the reasons to vote against Bush, but for Kerry?
Because he reads books
LO
Each brutal crush leads to more uprising.
Historically this just isn't true. An occupied people can only take so much before they buckle under. temporarily, perhaps, but it works.
Doesn't work for Palestine,
We need to secure areas, not individuals. If we can weed out the insurgents from the cities we will have a completely different situation.
To this we need better intel, much of it local, and we may need... more troops. But only if we accept and are prepared for a long occupation and doing it right. More troops for the same old approach would be counter-productive.
Brilliant strategies, Sir !
Your problem is :we, we, we, you think US, you don't think iraqi, as far as I can see, and you need to think iraqi to deal with Iraqis.
Killing hostile Iraqis will not bring you any support from average Iraqis because you kill Iraqis, they may be cousins, after all.
You're thinking war machine, and I tell you, my friend, that you lack thinking about men, your approach, I mean your lack of approach of Iraqi psychology is ground zero.
As long as you won't be abble to realise what does feel an occupied people.
Sorry to tell you this, Cobra Commander, no citizen fellow carnage can win hearts and minds
LO
Precisely. We absolutely must not only protect those who cooperate with us but it make it known across the land that such people have that protection.
If we can protect the citizens and brutally crush uprisings they will come to believe that not only will we win, but that it's a preferable outcome.
Each brutal crush leads to more uprising.
You will never have enough troops to protect those who cooperate with you, there can't be a US marine protecting each of Iraqis cooperating with you when troops hardly can secure themselves.
Us Army is fit for bighammering a large army, not to take control of an hostile ant nest.
Major General Charles Swannack, commander of the 82nd Airborne Division which was in western Iraq for much of the past year, said that tactically the US was winning but when asked if overall it was losing, replied: "I think strategically we are."
Colonel Paul Hughes, the first director of strategic planning in Iraq after the war, whose brother died in Vietnam said: "Here I am, 30 years later, thinking we will win every fight and lose the war, because we don't understand the war we are in."
LO
You're right Cindy, I'm not judging USA nor the Arabs, frankly, I don't like Islam religion, and I have admiration for the Congress members which investigate on mistreatments.
French never did so when our army tortured Algerians.
As an honest chess player, I'm just trying to watch people's point of view, and you can't deny that Iraqis feel occupied by foreigners.
If USA had been invaded by Reds, wouldn't US citizens have resisted to occupation by any means ?
Wouldn't Red occupyers have said they were there to bring to US people ligths of socialism and free USA from horrible capitalists ?
LO
As Kerry would be constrained by various factors to stay in Iraq,.......... and at this point there is no realistic option to simply leave Iraq to the wolves.
When you realise You are the wolves to the eyes of the Arabs
Frankly, Europe can stay home... your military really isn't up to the task, except for those countries which are already there.
Their public opinions may press their coming back home
http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsPackageArt … =news]Brit poll
I'd add that if the US is irritating and alienating Europe, Europe is doing a banner job of irritating and alienating Americans, as well.
I know, not to be conform copies of yours is so evilish
LO
Dumping the Bush Administration won't help win the war, it won't win over our enemies, and it won't persuade others to help
Absolutely wrong, 80% of Europeans dislike* Bush and Bush's America. Before Bush's election more than 65% had a pretty good opinion of USA. These 80% wish Bush out and though Kerry doesn't look very sexy, he's supported here just because hesn't Bush.
Kerry might get main Nato nations support to send troops in Irak.
if we stay the course posterity will vindicate us. If we waver or quit, we become the proverbial paper tiger.
If you leave, you loose, if you stay, you will stay as occupiers, not unlike Israeli army in occupied territories, when you pretended to bring to Iraqis freedom and welfare, you loose too
*dislike is an euphemism, not to say hate