New Mars Forums

True, not the best example, but the bottom one does show clouds with underlying dark areas, or a build up of water vapour, (on the left).

And the video face, good try, but on closer inspection the left eye, mouth are the rover being reflec, back.

Because Mars is the only planet in our solar system with this issue!

Saturns moon, no prob's, Venus and the Russian probes, no prob's, but Mars, must be overrun with ghosts that keep messing up,.....

This is obvious, we know as a fact now, that Mars can support liquid water at ground level, and there is very good evidence, (well the water droplets and wet ground l found previously, could have only come from rain) slam dunk evidence that Mars air pressure is Earth like, which means NASA is lying.

I would suggest you go back to that one, (water droplets on the rover) before commenting further here!

Lol, this conversation gets funnier and funnier, maybe the Russians should take over, they landed several times on Venus, with crippling pressures and open oven temp's, and for the 40 odd minutes before it succumbed, it took perfect color images of the landscape.

No, NASA is US military run, and they don't want disclosure yet, as that would lead to free energy and denting crude oil profits, (100 trillion dollars of crude oil profits in the ground, kills the magic piles of cash idea, as does crashing the stockmarket.

Because jets following a UFO, with CGI can be faked, and the skeptics can dismiss it. The UFO l found following the Apollo atranuats is a slam dunk in regards to NASA, and Buzz fibbing, (and impossible for a 10 ton panel to reverse and play catchup)

Ok, but ponder this, when l found water droplets on the rover, with the only explanation being that the rover sprung a leak, (l checked, the rover is working perfectly, and radiator coolent leaking into the electronics would show something) then rain is the only explanation.

That image should be front page news, but we hear nothing?

NASA is telling individuals which can see it without the monkey mind kicking in, that Mars is Earthlike and inhabited, but doing it in such a way that the monkeys can dismiss it for the most part.

But if l showed the water droplet image elsewhere, (solid proof) l can guarantee you that anger, and every demented reason under the sun would ensure. Or l would be attacked for posting it, or preschool replys would occur.

Maybe some alternatives, but overall anger, and stupid comebacks.

People for the most part just don't want to know, they want to believe NASA never lies, and Mars is a dead rock, and that counter evidence can always be dismissed.

But evidence cannot be dismissed, and not buried forever. NASA will show a HD image of a tree on Mars, but only when third party interests are making it so difficualt to bury that they may as well get it over with, before Musk,etc tells everyone.

And the human mind, unfortunately.

Change of pace today, or first Insight lander image, with a blue sky which is promising, but....

Nope the dumb red/orange filter is back, as is the low res, for the next one.

Although the silver thing sitting in the distance, (and possibly in the air) are most likely martian UFO's, reflected of the lander.

Need to see different parts of the rover, to be sure that this isn't part of it, but it probably isn't

So this is related to First Man, when the apollo module gets released from the command module, and the 4 panels holding those stages together gets flung off.

NASA and Buzz both claim that these 4 panels kept pace with the command and lunar module, but this movie, which was painfully accurate and realistic showed the command module moving away into space with no panels keeping pace at all.

In fact the 1969 mission, the 4 panels went into Earth orbit and later burned up.

Apparently when some go and see this after reading this....http://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=8020 they may finally realize that this is a legitimate UFO, and NASA, etc were lying.

Nothing new to us we know NASA is lying about Mars, and it is second nature to them.

But some tend to spit the dummy, and give you the cold shoulder, when proven wrong, which l find pretty funny. Finding out the truth should be the main motivating factor, not l am an emotional dependent on the herd mentality.

Ok, Louis, point taken, l will use red from now on, (or at least a color that stands out).

I would have loved to say that this was something artificial, but it is only the rover trudging down a hill, and throwing some dust about.

PS the blue dot is me being tired, and marking my discovery for later processing.

Sunset, (lower part) and either mist or a lake, (l am going with a lake because of the sun glistening off of it).

First image of the Sol 590 series.

The sun is still setting but these are the last of the Sol 590 images.

Bottom setting sun and plant, top, l would normally say dust devils, but these things look more like tornadoes to me. We know now that Mars air pressure and temp's are comparable to Earths, desert areas, but it would be pretty freaky weather if tornadoe's are common.

You will be amazed by the number of people out there that will buy any silly idea to explain something.

One of Musks rockets with an elite communications satellite on board gets blown up on the launchpad, with fast drones whizzing past, with heat weapons, (obviously not one of ours) but NASA says that it was a bird breaking the sound barrier, eventhough the fastest speed is around 200km/s, (you need 700).

NASA has issues with red filters on Mars, eventhough this doesn't occur anywhere else!!!!

A UFO following the Apollo astranuats on most of their missions is one of the SLR panels, eventhough the 1969 mission was confirmed, (the 4 panels) to go into earths orbit and burn up.

Some just refuse anything that confirms a coverup or worse an alien presence, even to the point of insanity, but we have to go by the evidence, especially this sort of thing.

I can promise you that if l took the water drop, rover images, and wet dirt, (both of which are impossible) and clearly show earth like air pressures and rain, elsewhere, l would find fear, anger and incredible stupidity on others part.

Or things like, "your evidence isn't what l consider evidence" or attacking the poster, but very few intelligently discussing the subject or worse agreeing with the evidence.

Thankfully about 70% of the US population know that mars is earthlike, but are waiting for NASA to cut the crap and show us; the remaining 30%, don't know, but some are clearly completely brainwashed, and will never accept it.

Least til they get HD image in their faces, which is inevitable.

A 12 year old kid with a $100 dollar telescope can prove that mars has an atmosphere, blue sky and green, when mars is in range, but the adults with the 5 year old mentality will go with what NASA says.

:\

Pretty obvious that this is a dirt road leading to a stone sculpture.

But since that doesn't make much sense, l believe that this is a road leading up to a door that leads to an underground,.....house, l guess.

Bottom image spotted this face on the hill, and after computer enhancement, saw that it was a face, a female grays face no less.

Doesn't look like an Independence Day, ready to knock us off, evil face to me, quite the opposite.

We need to stop watching Hollywood movies, except "The Day the Earth Stood Still", (the first one, not the demented second one) and Close Encounters l guess.

Not sure that this is but it doesn't look natural.

Rover in the foreground, plant in the background.

And this one, blue hills and setting sun in the background, plant life in the foreground.

Similar one, just another ending of a partially overcast day, with a slight chance of light showers, and a white sun setting over the landscape inbetween the plant life, or small tree's.

The Earth and it's inhabitants will never be the same again, once this come's out.

More plants, the landscape appears to be littered with these things, and strong lime to grass green is what the CP shows, although the green is clearly visible.

top image rainclouds or more plants, (the landscape is misty so l am learning more towards rain).

Bottom image is a gully with green, which tends to show that Mars doesn't have serious rainfall, or just short bursts, for this area; which is no surprise with orbit images showing no green.

So short bursts, but not enough to fill a dam. Mars may even be in a drought for this area?

But plant life growing around the base of a gully is a good indication of that idea.