New Mars Forums

Official discussion forum of The Mars Society and MarsNews.com

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Announcement: This forum is accepting new registrations via email. Please see Recruiting Topic for additional information. Write newmarsmember[at_symbol]gmail.com.
  1. Index
  2. » Search
  3. » Posts by Algol

#26 Re: Not So Free Chat » A Small Report From Europe - It's about immigration » 2004-08-12 06:29:43

What about western contractors working in the middle east?

#27 Re: Not So Free Chat » A Small Report From Europe - It's about immigration » 2004-08-12 05:38:51

But how much should one be expected to assimilate and in what areas?

#28 Re: Not So Free Chat » European Cowardice » 2004-08-12 02:49:58

sailors aboard the battleships at Pearl Harbor were all innocent.  There was no declaration of war.

Dont want to be controversial but, the americans sunk a jap submarine at the entrance to Pearl Harbor just over an hour before the main attack began; so technically seeing as shots had been fired (interestingly enough the USA fired the first shots) you could say the war had started even though the jap ambassador was late with his message. But thats just me throwing info out there.


What did we sell and to whom?

You sold us lots of lots of shiny bits of military equipment during the war and then lent us lots of money afterwards. Cheers!


Bringing the Iraqi people freedom and prosperity is a noble goal, but that was not the reason why we went to war.  Because of that, we were in the wrong mindset to help the Iraqi people, and the benefits that they have gained are diminished.  Perhaps if we had done this to help the Iraqi people, Iraq would not be the breeding ground of terrorism and discontent that it is today.

Exactly. If you look at Afghanistan and Iraq, you have on one hand a country descended into religious fanaticism basically run by terrorists, on the other you have heavily secular country, and practically the only country in the region to not harbour terroists. And then look at how much GWB wants to spend on each one in his war on TERROR.

Sadham was a evil man who did evil things to his people, but he was basically a third rate despot with little or no ability to destabalise a table let alone the region. There are roughly thirty of those in the world today, is GWB going to make us invade them all?


BTW, the IRA was funded by America(ns) to buy guns from Libya, drugs from columbia and kill us Brits - that always annoyed me.


They certainly were not trained by the USA to be terrorists.

Erm yes, of course they were trained to fight a conventail war.  :laugh:
The world is primarilly screwed up today because of the west and the old USSR playing wars and politics by proxy everywhere they could. The west is all thats left so its our responsibilty to clear up the mess.

#29 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Quantum entaglement as propulsion - Interstellar spaceflight possible? » 2004-08-11 04:57:37

What this means is that if the communication appears instantaneous in one reference frame, it will appear to send information back in time for someone in another reference frame.

Yes, but that isnt a violation of causality. It is a simple reflection of the speed of observation.


Take for instance, a situation where you see a man shoot another man at a great distance. You will see the gun fire and the man fall dead before either the sound of the gunshot or the sound of the body thumping to the floor have reached you, this doesnt mean that the man died before the gunshot happened.

The light in this example is to sound, as quantum entanglement is to light. The fact that QT is  'instantaneous' and we normally consider light to be instantaneous leads to confusion in our minds but does not and cannot violate causality.

#30 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Soyuz:  Fly Me to the Moon » 2004-08-10 03:00:55

Presumealy if you buy the soyuz outright it will be extra to normal servicing/crew transfer ones. You could dock at the space station for a week as an extra. All you then need on top of that is to produce the lunar injectionstage/living module and your away. Say, $100m total, maximum.

#31 Re: Human missions » Businesses In Space - Businesses In Space » 2004-08-09 02:05:45

How about manufactoring?  for example, machine cutting bits.  I heard that perfect crystals can be grown in microgravity, and if they can be formed into cutting tools, they probably would last mouths before needing replacements.  I work in a machine shop and I know that the cutting tools need to be replaced at least 3x a shift.  Machine shops pay fortunes for highend exotic cutting tools that last longer. . . .what if they suddenly had acess to a miracle tool that lasted mouths. . . .

The result would probably be manufactoring growth that would hire more people.

Whilst using single crystals can enhance some mechanical properties, namely creep, toughness and hardness would be largely unaffected. The processes to toughen tools and bits are unaffected by gravity.

#32 Re: Human missions » Businesses In Space - Businesses In Space » 2004-08-06 01:59:48

Myabe it should be combined with the CSI tranlunar plan?. You could probably get an extra 20M$ from a TV company then as well.

#34 Re: Not So Free Chat » JibJab ("My Land") » 2004-07-26 08:49:18

Very funny  big_smile

What is the thing about the botox?

Theres a rumour (probably true) that Kerry has Botox injections.


Funniest bit.

You can't say nu-clear, that really scares-me....  :laugh:

#35 Re: Human missions » Kerry's position on space - any one know were Kerry stands » 2004-07-26 02:28:18

Yet making the project work will be a herculean political task because it must survive as many as 10 presidential administrations, 20 Congresses and 40 federal budget cycles before a Mars landing could occur around 2050."

One of the things i like about ESA is that once they approve a mission or a programme the members are committed to funding it to completition. There is only the initial decision to go, and assuming everything stays within budget, it cant actually be stopped by the politicians.

#36 Re: Not So Free Chat » Greetings - From the Moon-Mars Blitz » 2004-07-21 02:14:51

The guy near the lady with the hair and next to the man with the shirt and tie. ???

#37 Re: Human missions » Europe goes to the moon and Mars! - Human space flight.... » 2004-07-21 02:10:55

http://www.esa.int/esaCP/SEMGNTU4QWD_in … tml]Aurora participants approve preparatory phase for European Space Exploration Programme

Comments.....

#39 Re: Human missions » Clunking to Mars - Are the needed parts already up there? » 2004-07-20 04:54:33

Imagine theyd discovered the problems with Columbia before it came down, and theyd been forced to abandon it in leo.

How incredible would it be if they just decided to refuel, fire it up and send it of to mars........ sigh.

Maybe when they're retired, we should start a petition to send one to mars!

#40 Re: Science, Technology, and Astronomy » ESA:  Move an Asteroid - ...Sancho & Hidalgo/"Don Quijote" » 2004-07-19 09:39:07

Therefore, it strikes me as intellectually dishonest and simple grandstanding - trying to "show up the mighty unilateral Americans" or otherwise - to tout this mission as a means of developing a technology to prevent asteroid impacts... If we are going to use nukes to "nudge" them, then why isn't the impactor being fitted with explosives?

Actually if you read the press release it mentions explosives..................


Also, from the press release.....


Sancho will then watch as Hidalgo arrives and smashes into the asteroid at very high speed. This will provide information about the behaviour of the internal structure of the asteroid during an impact event as well as excavating some of the interior for Sancho to observe. After the impact, Sancho and telescopes from Earth will monitor the asteroid to see how its orbit and rotation have been affected.

and

“When we do actually find a hazardous asteroid, you could imagine a Don Quijote-type mission as a precursor to a mitigation mission. It will tell us how the target responds to an impact and will help us to develop a much more effective mitigation mission.”

God-darned americans, always jumping to conclusions....  yikes

#41 Re: Not So Free Chat » Good books you've just read » 2004-07-19 06:37:11

Just read "Under the Frog" by Tibor Fischer. Absolutely superb book, cant emphasise enough how much you all should read it.

Shortlisted for the Booker Prize, Under the Frog follows the adventures of two young Hungarian basketball players through the turbulent years between the end of World War II and the anti-Soviet uprising of 1956. In this spirited indictment of totalitarianism, the two improbable heroes, Pataki and Gyuri, travel the length and breadth of Hungary in an epic quest for food, lodging, and female companionship.

Its both deeply moving and seriously funny, both a bitter denouciation of a totalitarian regime and a reflection on how laughter can rise out of tradegy, and tradegy out of absurbity.

#42 Re: Human missions » Europe goes to the moon and Mars! - Human space flight.... » 2004-07-16 02:30:34

Europe is an inneficient organisation, as most international projects are, but i feel proud that we are trying and im willing to accept inneficiency at first - but like anybody only up to a point.

ESA on the other hand, from what ive seen, is quite an efficient organisation. All the different cultures and perspectives actually create a dynamic working environment - and the constant flow of people in and out of the organisation seem to always be bring fresh ideas and attitudes to the table.


What always amazes me is that ESA only employs 2000 staff and another 2000 contractors compared to NASAs 25'000 staff and 40'000 contractors!


As for the English-French rivalry its really just a bit of fun. As the 100 year celebrations of the entente-cordiale showed recently, England and France have been on good terms for longer than most countries in Europe. The rivalry is similar to the way we mock the Irish, or the French mock the Belgians or the Swiss.

#43 Re: Human missions » The Kerry Factor - John Kerry's Views of PlanBush » 2004-07-13 07:26:12

I dont want to drag the topic back into environmental discussions but i just read this article and had to post a link.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/3886275.stm]BBC - US pollution may damage UK health

lol

#44 Re: Human missions » The Kerry Factor - John Kerry's Views of PlanBush » 2004-07-09 08:05:30

Marriage ceremonies are just that, ceremonies. They don't define the underlying social purpose of the union.

But you do? I suppose marriage doesnt symobolise anything and the exchanged vows mean nothing to the participants?


the key phrase being "are prepared to commit to spending the rest of their lives together, no matter what." That's the whole point, not for their own benefit, but for the benefit of any children they might produce and from a wider perspective to the benefit of society as a whole. People get married for personal emotional reasons, marriage exists for practical social reasons.


So, by your logic once the children move out the marriage becomes pointless?

Marriage is about love, we arent changing anything, simply accepting that two people of the same sex are capable of loving one another.

#45 Re: Human missions » The Kerry Factor - John Kerry's Views of PlanBush » 2004-07-09 07:57:13

It's not even an equal rights issue, a gay man has the same rights to marry a woman as I do. He just doesn't want to.

Granted you and i both have the right to marry Cindy, but apart from the fact that shes already married and wouldnt take us anyway, I want to marry someone i love (i love you in another sense). A gay man will want to marry the man he loves and should have that right.



Nothing against homosexuals, but they need to understand that theirs is a lifestyle that the majority of people look on as deviant. It will never be considered normal, to try and make it so is an exercise in fantasy. Grant them the priveleges, but call it something else. Expanding "marriage" will undermine it and lead to far more social division than is necessary.

Deviants comment aside, same-sex marriage is legal in the Netherlands and the divorce rate is almost 50% higher in the United States.


It always comes down to two real issues. One, they want insurance benefits, visitation rights, joint taxation and other such mundane practicalities. Fine, institute some sort of civil union, similar to marriage but not. But of course this isn't good enough, for the second reason, which is that certain segments of the homosexual community want to flaunt it. They aren't content with tolerance or even acceptance, they want to be in your face with it.

How many married homosexual couples have you met?

#46 Re: Human missions » The Kerry Factor - John Kerry's Views of PlanBush » 2004-07-09 07:22:34

No, it isn't. The primary reason for it is children. Certainly there are married couples who don't plan to have any, but that's the underlying purpose.

Cobra, next time you are invited to someones wedding, listen to the couples vows and count how many times they mention children. Next, listen to what the priest says and count how many times he mentions children and count how many times he mentions LOVE.

"will you have this woman as your lawful wedded wife, to live together in the estate of matrimony? Will you love her, honor her, comfort her, and keep her in sickness and in health; forsaking all others, be true to her as long as you both shall live?"


If you look at marriages and why people marry, the common denominator is not children, money or even living together, its LOVE. Two people who love each other want to bind themselves together and show everybody that they love each other so much that they are prepared to commit to spending the rest of their lives together, no matter what. The fact that marriage is a loving environment and one that is both beneficial and conducive to bringing up children is a good thing but ultimately not the reason for the union.




If, as you assert, it is to show a union between two people who love each other, then again, gay marriage is pointless. They can already do that.

Yes, they can put an ad in the local newspaper and have it written in the sky if they like too, but marriage is the ultimate symbol of two peoples love for one another, why should people be denied that because of their sexuality.

#47 Re: Human missions » The Kerry Factor - John Kerry's Views of PlanBush » 2004-07-09 07:05:57

Quote 
All (Okay, most) of the pro-Bush arguments are weak, flawed, or both. 


And there are no pro-Kerry arguments, only anti-Bush arguments. Rhetoric, mostly.

So we have a situation where we cant say anything positive about one candidate and we only have negative things to say about the other. Tough call, but i know which way id go.

#48 Re: Human missions » The Kerry Factor - John Kerry's Views of PlanBush » 2004-07-09 07:02:52

*Algol, you're from England.

Why do issues pertaining to the U.S. Constitution and rights issues interest you?  Just curious (not a challenge).

--Cindy

No problem Cindy.

In 1952 Alan Turing, a mathematical genius who had led the teams to break both ENIGMA and CIPHER as well as concieving of and helping to build the first computer in history, a man awarded and OBE and given the highest security clearance personally by both Winston Churchill and the White House, was convicted of being a homosexual.

From then on as an alternative to imprisonment he was forced to have regular injections of oestrogen designed to eliminate his sexual drive and control his 'urges'. During the Cold War, homosexuals were considered a security risk and after his conviction, he became ineligible for security clearance and he was forced to stop his work.

Two years later he poisoned himself with cyanide to avoid further 'embarassment'.

How times have changed.

Many countries are making moves towards creaing equal rights for both homosexual and hetrosexual couples to marry.
I feel that a country which claims to be 'the land of the free' has a lot to answer from when its president tries to ban homosexual marriage in its constitution.

#49 Re: Human missions » The Kerry Factor - John Kerry's Views of PlanBush » 2004-07-08 10:49:26

Yes, why should we have to change the Constitution, they're the ones that want to change the law.

And in what way, exactly, is gay marriage unlawful? I fully support efforts to legalise it.

You can say many thing about Kerry, but what does it tell us about Bush when he tries to write that into the Constitution?

#50 Re: Human missions » The Kerry Factor - John Kerry's Views of PlanBush » 2004-07-08 09:49:37

Bush will certainly be remembered in 50 years time - its why and how he is remembered that will be interesting.

Don't want to beat the "WMD" issue again -- but we still have yet to turn those up.  And I'd have some peace of mind if they did.


Personally, the whole outlawing gay marriage in the constitution thing was the final straw for me.  sad

  1. Index
  2. » Search
  3. » Posts by Algol

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB