You are not logged in.
The Mars rover in the foreground, and what looks like a city in the background.
I thought that the lower right was a drawing, but probably just part of the rover. Lower image, the rover, (arrow) and a building on the left, with some more possible structures on the hilltop, and the city or industrial complex on the right.
The thing that l thought was the rover, is most likely a giant structure depicting a humanoid holding a silver plate, (right hand) and throwing something from a cane, (left hand), which makes more sense with the giant buildings, etc in the distance. A factory sign or signifying that this city makes the best pasta, (with humanoids on the planet, a large part of their diets should match ours) best guess?
Dark clouds left, and a good example of not getting all excited and doing a YT video about it, (right), or this looks like an artificial, dirty and transparent structure with something inside?
But on closer inspection it is the rovers wheel, and the top bit, part of the rover also.
Ok back to work.
A good example of a river.
And this, more examples of water flows on the lower image, (the ground in previous images where the rover was embedding its tracks looked damp, but nothing clinging to the wheels, so not postworthy).
And this, l had to run through 10 images, but it was worth it. Whatever this is it is reflecting in the stream, (which confirms that this is water) and seriously looks like a human wearing a toga type outfit. He appears to be facing away from us and has white or gray hair, which would back up a race of humans being descended from an Egyptian type race in the past, (the Sedona region, with the face and pyramids, exactly matches Earths in regards to pinpointing neighbouring star systems).
I posted this also, since the first right hand image was from a video, and could be passed off as a fake.
Right, Viking 1998, left Hubble 2017
Or in other words, iron clad, 100% proof that NASA is lying, (atmospheres just dont vanish, or go through all Earth images and try to find one without its atmosphere).
Oh for deity's sake - it's COMPLETELY different lighting!!
Do you not have a single photographic clue? The lighting angle can do all sorts of things regarding color balance, and UNLESS you look at that ACTUAL filtration that was used at the time of exposure, AND all/any subsequent post processing, this sort of idiotic handwaving is.... idiotic handwaving.
There are many people out there who know how to do this, and also know how complex and subjective it can be. Thos people also know how to get back to the original uncorrected images, and all the specifications and information about sun angle etc that you would need to do a rigorous analysis.
..... is NOT one of those people, and I'm certainly not wasting my time trying to educate the uneducatable.
I'll ask again, is anyone else seeing inexplicable green that they think must be vegetation?
Anyone else not know that Mars does have a (thin) atmosphere, and that color of that atmosphere (again) is very complex and depends on sun / camera angles, type and amount of dust, etc..?
Total nutter, that is beyond rational conversation.
I thought that l had proven beyond a doubt that NASA intentionally hides data, but nope, infinite stupid is infinite.
It seems that the thought that Mars is earthlike raises the intelligent life idea, and that literally scares the hell out of some people. NASA's BS leaked videos using fear as a deterrent also add's to this barrier.
Also explains why l never post this sort of material there, dealing with closed minded, dimwits every day takes its toll.
The ESA image l posted previously is not available on their ESA site, or l got it from Google images. Which is ok, since Hubble backs it up.
And since the vultures are still circling elsewhere, l have had to up the antie.
The right hand image, (l took the same part or area) is a screenshot from the NASA video l showed previously as it is the only recent image available, and the left is from the Gif animation that Hubble took in 1998.
As you can see left blue atmosphere, right none, left green and orange, right none.
Atmospheres around planets just don't vanish, and is a classic example of NASA's lies in full force.
ESA does have some mars from orbit images, but they are the usual bs, no blue ones mass media rely on.
And l have also found that when l try to download their high res images, they are always in Tif format, instead of Jpeg, which is standard, unless you want to embed a virus or two.
Which NASA has done to deter a closer inspection, (cannot open it with Photoshop, and it tends to open my virtual XP, don't ask me why, or l have to force it into Photoshop)
Silence so far elsewhere, but l expect a seriously stupid reply to explain something that cannot be explained apart from an intentional coverup.
Those are the Flat worlders which can not even believe Earth is round.
Post #687 is without a doubt beautiful.
What we need is the timing for when they were taken in regards to seasons for mars.
Are we still seeing the cloud cover?
True, Mars is another jewel apart from Earth, but some only want to see a dead, rock, which relates to stagnant mindset, which seems appropriate.
https://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/targe … Telescope:
This is where l got most of my recent links from, but l don't think that there are any time delayed images here, although from the polar icecap and such, mars does have seasons.
It must have taken a small army to Photoshop the last Mars from orbit image l could find from NASA, (one above or in the video) which explains why it is very difficult to find a Mars image from orbit on any NASA site?
I guess they figure that one very good lie or image will keep things together, but there is 14 years to go, until NASA most likely tells the truth about all of this, but from what l have recently witnessed the herd is so well trained now, NASA doesn't need to try so hard.
Evidence does not convince even from a NASA site, for some, and yeah, when NASA shows the monolith with markings or writing on it, in 2033 when they land on one of Mars moons, these types need to be kept away from small firearms,...l guess.
;/
This is how ridiculous NASA is getting...
First two images are from around 1998, from Hubble and the ESA satellite, both show green areas on the planet and blue atmosphere, (eventhough it is harder to see on Hubble, the lakes) and then we have the most recent raw image l could find, (last one) on what Mars looks like from orbit.
I typed in raw images from NASA of Mars, but this image from last year is the only one l could find.
The blue atmosphere has vanished, as has all of the vegetation and lakes or inland oceans.
Well it shows no atmosphere at all from what l can see.
So if we trust in NASA and compare its Hubble library of Mars images with this one, that must mean that its blue atmosphere disappears and reappears on a regular bases, and it must also change color from red to blue constantly which covers all of the Spirit/Opp and Curiosity images, (about 25 years in total, and 99% red/orange, regardless of elevation, etc).
I would think that you need to be a little psychotic to buy this nonsense, and more so to keep buying it.
Well, same old ending elsewhere, after showing the image l posted here a while ago showing mars from orbit with the lakes and such, they wanted to know where, which is very hard to find, (or it has been pulled) so went to a NASA site and found this instead.
https://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/archi … 80x720.mp4
Confirms that Mars has a blue sky and plant life, but not really the lakes or oceans, but that is a given considering.
Completely ignored the three links l provided and instead trashed the author of the original ESA Mars image????
As Einstein said "human stupidity is infinite" or evidence does not convince.
Apparently others are asking reasonably nicely elsewhere, and at least until stupid comes into the conversation l will keep replying, but during some research l found this clever NASA video.
https://mars.nasa.gov/allaboutmars/nigh … -approach/
As you can see, they only show the true Mars with blue atmosphere and green in a collage image or small scale, then show the most recent closeup one, (58 seconds in) full screen on the video, and as usual, no atmosphere, and the no green joke we are used to.
Another v interesting find on Mars:
Yees, the statue isn't bad, but it is also reflecting a lot of the rover back to us, so l don't know?
I occasionally come across stuff like this then bin it, when l realize that it is ref, back the rover, and isn't a face or whatever.
Just had a run in with a troll elsewhere, and phew, bitched and moaned about everything l said, then l posted the ESA Mars image, with the blue atmosphere and green, etc, which is pretty much slamming NASA. And it did quiet down, then kept baiting his posts so l would post something else. No acknowledgement or apologies, or even recognition that l have something.
Yes, when NASA tells the truth to the mindless masses, these are the ones that l will keep an eye on.
0:55 - amazing image. WTF is it? A rock? I really don't think so. Very odd. Could be a skull but what is it attached to...?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Op5vXIfYiCA
Hoping Joe Wright will do a more detailed video on this with commentary...I think he rushed this out.
Probably a combination of the rover and reflective rock, but the thing in the distance behind it with the wire and pole isn't the rover at all, and is a legitimate artificial object.
And all images above, except the cloud one were taken from this image.
Mars sun still setting and a sky of rainbearing clouds, (top).
Next ones down naturally show puddles and water flows, (pretty obvious from the right hand one, reflecting the sunset back to us).
Obviously with little rain and small animals running about some tracks should be seen coming from and to the puddles, (bottom arrow shows that) and it doesn't fit the rovers tracks, or they disappear.
So l tried to track it down, and found this. Could be part of the rover or a white, skinny wild cat?
And last, appears to be a stand alone martain machine, or the surrounding landscape is behind this thing so it is not a ref, of the rover.
There appears to be a path going past this thing, so a more elaborate totem pole or letterbox is my best guess.
Right hand image, may be a closer look at the weird building, or there are details there that shouldn't be.
Left, middle arrow, sun setting, and the right arrow, l don't believe that this is the rover. Or it appears to be depicting a statue of a humanoid with big ears and a dark hat on. If smoke is rising from this then it is probably another restaurant, (l know smoke, but the next image add's a little more credibility to that idea.
Left sun still setting on an overcast sky, and some weird martian face above the sun, not sure if this is an hologram or a fluke but worth mentioning.
Right what appears to be smoke rising or it is in front of the hills so is not clouds. Might be the rovers dust rising, which at least shows there is no wind about today.
This one l have no idea? Best guess that this is one of the arms from the statue and is holding something related. The gray area above may be someone walking through their door with the lower part depicting plants perhaps. With their level of tech, this could be a giant 360d, holographic movie screen constantly running their wares.
If you have a business on mars, apparently giant models or holographic projectors are the way to get peoples attention.
https://www.upi.com/NASA-engineers-are- … 551116015/
Apparently Curiosity rebooted and then went into safe mode, (its critical systems are linix based and created by a software company) or something happened.
NASA is claiming it is looking into it, but a lame excuse is the most likely answer.
The rover landed in 2012, and has been driving over the landscape for 6 years, or 6 years of building up a static charge, and as we know mars has rain, so the rover being hit by lighting is the most likely answer.
Of course NASA will never admit that, so garbeging the software company is the most likely scapegoat.
Almost missed this one, or it shows the sun glistening off something, and also seems to show water running down this hill.
These are the kind of images l like since the rover is easily seen so any other strange things are not the rover.
Image on the right shows the rover, and its wheels; it also shows the sun behind it, blue hills and the sun partially obscured by a cloud.
Image on the left also shows the same rover, but also shows other weird things that are clearly not shadows on this rock, and the background hills are also visible.
So since the rover is taken out of this anomaly and it cannot be mineral deposits, (very unlikely that mineral deposits this fine and supporting heavier segments could stay intact over millions of years.
We are most likely seeing the root structure of a martian shrub.
Fascinating video.
This image doesn't seem to fit, (left) or if the arrow thing is the rover, then what is the dark thing behind it?
Probably the mountain,....or a burnt out house.
Top, right traces of rainfall, and bottom, r, this strange building again which seems to have antenna on the right and a pudgy, smiling grays face up top.
Radio station best guess; Mars is highly industrialized so no doubt even if they are a good thousand years ahead of us, some things will remain similar to Earth.
Left spotted this structure again, and yep there may also be a smiling grays face up top, (so much for the evil aliens Hollywood pushes). Right this humanoid structure that may be holding a sign, and also casting its reflection in the puddle.
Petrified jellyfish or art?
Another image showing recent waterflows.
The mars rover trungling over the landscape and throwing up some dust, the stuff on the right no idea.
Sol 594
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2a3kvVJkohA
Interesting video, and yep mars face, Viking showed it to be half a km high, with latest images showing it to be much shallower, or tampered with as one lady says in the video.
Plausible Deniability is NASA's game, or bury all of this since society couldn't handle it, eventhough 70% of the Earths population believe that there is something there, and it is more of the case of the elite losing its cushy oil profits.
As for someone blindly believing in an authority figure from NASA, nope, as l have recently witnessed, if the authority figure says something controversial then he won't be believed either.
The only ones that will be shocked are the ones, who refuse to be open to all of this, and yeah, they deserve to be shocked and then some.
Same old today, plants in the wind, humans so forth.
Doesn't look like much, but the lower you go the greener it becomes, which add's credibility to what SpaceNut mentioned earlier, but l tend to think that the base of this gully is damper or recently had flowing water.
Stand alone plant, and you may notice that the umm, leaves are pointing to the right, or this area is subject to strong winds. Yep look up lying in the dictionary and NASA will top the list.
Spotted these strange structures which almost looks like a park, then spotted what looks like a humanoid sitting on one. Impossible to tell what the lower element is l would like to say mother, etc but just too hard to make out.
But the guy looks overweight and is lowering the swing by sitting on it, not concrete evidence that humaniods are there, but in light of previous evidence pretty good.
Lets say its a statue and it had a rock impact to it while it was vertical. Then the left side of the frame would have more parts to the statue to say yey or ney but it sure is very interesting to see. The fact that its got a bowl shape crater would make it likely that its just burried in the sand. Its not what I would expect for a natural formation....
I have two natural rock formations in my state..There must be more..
Yep, thought of that, but the other rock, showing the eye or flower design shows that this is something else. An overly excited kid on YT showing something like this doesn't mean that it is real, only that he found this and didn't look into all possibilities before posting.
A good example is this one...
Looks like a furry, martian slug, but is it.
Nope!
Curiositys wheel rim, make up the end, on the left, and the front of this is the rovers, ref, or a plant?
YOu can see the blue hills and clouds and other greenish things dotting the lanscape, reflected back in this rock, but not a slug.
Insects are very hard to find, although l am hopeful that we may see a martian fly hovering around the rover one day, and apart from the spider being squished by the rover, (video, first post) havn't found much else, but l have only bee through 1/4 of all of these images, so who knows, what NASA will let slip.
Thanks TM for embedding the images.
![]()
I don't claim it's a statue or - even more - an "Egyptian" statue but I do claim if you came across that on Earth in a desert you would probably be startled and think it was made by a human being. So why isn't NASA startled by it? It is probably one of the top 20 image finds on Mars. Spectacular.
And the other close-by artefact you put up is also v. interesting. It is suggestive of another statue though much more heavily eroded.
Which made me think - if the prevailing wind is coming from the top right corner of the image, the more defined "statue" would have been well protected by the big rock almost adjacent to it while the second, more eroded, artefact would have been subject to violent eddies of wind being so much further from the big rock.
Also we have to remember that the wind on Mars is much weaker than on Earth (about 5% of its power if I remember rightly...but don't quote me). So any statues in a well protected position would resist erosion for much longer.
True, but if you saw that it was a shiny volcanic rock and it was reflecting back a closeby sunflour so it looked like a face, then no further study would be necessary.
And NASA has lied about the air pressure, (can't have rain with their air pressures) and the overnight temps, (minus 200df, would kill all plant life off) and we have seen overwhelming signs of that, or they most likely moved the decimal place across and minus 2 is the coldest, or typical desert overnight temps on Earth, then lying about wind strength is a given.
Since Mars has rain and storms then its wind speeds will likely be com probable to ours.
The other artifact l saw was confirming that it was a plant flour or possibly the rover, (although l have never seen that design on the rover).
And startled yes, even the skeptics cannot answer that one, since they want to believe that our world has no conspiracy theorys. But why isn't mass media reporting the rain drops on the rover, or that NASA is reporting a major leak in its nuclear reactor liquid system???
Because mass media is muzzled and cannot report this, and NASA knows that Mars is another habitable planet, and cannot report that, because of mass panic.
They have to one day, but because of oil profits, (free energy) and keeping power, we will only get evidence like this that they can BS their way out of if cornered.
Quite orinically if Mars had no past civilization or present and could support life, then we may have heard about it a long time ago.
Anybody want to put their hand up and claim that's "just a rock"?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T9dI-_3dTYw
If anyone can embed an image that would be great.
Oooh, that is good.
I have been trying to pass this off as the rovers ref,
But as the lower, left rock shows, it looks nothing like the rover.
And the dark part of the face, doesn't appear to be the hills being ref, back to us, but a shadow, and yep the shadow is curving around the blow of the face, adding more credibility.
But on closer inspection l can also see the sun setting in the face near the eye, and clouds and the blue hills, so l would love to say that this is an Egyption face, but cannot.
I would say that we are seeing a closeup of a martian plant or its flower, sorry.
This also explains why computer enhancement shows no replication at all, (l at least expected to see an eye outline).
So martian plant, but unlikely that this is anything else.
And l also spotted some strong green up the top.
More plants or probably one of the best ones l have found recently.
The thing on the left is probably ones as well, but the stand alone one, (arrow) is the most captivating.
CP shows strong to lime green, with spiky leaves and a sunflower up top.
This could also be another sculpture, since there may be a face also up top, but l can't be sure of that one, but close to slam dunk that this is a martian plant, that resembles a spicky leaved sunflower.