You are not logged in.
Yeah Alt, your pot-head friends might make up a small selective percentage of pot users. You forget to mention how screwed up the other 99% are.
Most of my friends toke up right before they go snowboarding, just to "make it more fun". I can imagine them right now getting high and running into a tree. I'll bet they work at Denny's the rest of their lives.
Nice job getting the children of America to toke up, Josh. If I gave you a $10 bill, would you score me some Bud?
HAS ANYONE EVER HAD TO TAKE A DARE CLASS?!
and what point would that be, my mysticist aquaintence?
LOL- Laughing out Loud
That's the only one I've seen used here.
What? What would cause NASA to focus research on legs between now and Mars when they crap themselves just playing with the ISS!
Can you guys accept a point for its surface value? I told you that my comment was trying to say that if you need to use tobacco to fight off boredom, find something better to do with your time. Personally, I don't own a PS2, and I'm pretty sure I have a new computer in a box under my Christmas tree right now, so I don't really care. You shouldn't smoke to keep from being bored.
There is what is Right,
There is what is Correct,
and there is what is True.Rarely are all three the same.
And I am 110% positive that my beliefs are where the 3 intersect.
No offense intended, but what is pitiful is the hard-nosed attitude that so many people have towards people less priveliged than themselves. THAT is what is pitiful. In fact, it makes one ashamed to be human, at times.
If you need pot to escape poverty, I feel sorry for you...
And I do know what I'm talking about, and I am not surprised at the size of the American populace that uses pot. It's very small. I'm talking regular users. My state (Colorado) has the highest percentage of pot users in the union, and I have to live with these people everyday. I, too, can name quite a few people I know who smoke pot. They're pitiful losers who will never do anything with their lives but hold grunt-jobs and stick around our small rural town.
Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson were living under an oppresive British crown when they said those things. And colonial states weren't being bombed by foreign terrorists. Nor were any other nations at that time.
And my question still stands:
What good are the rights in our constitution if we can't defend them?
Just because something isn't tangible doesn't mean it can't exist as a truth. I said I had adopted it as MY truth. I accept belief with no proven facts, and adopt it as MY truth.
Clark wrote:
If you can rationally accept that your truth may not be any more correct or any more incorrect than any other belief, why is their a need to choose?
I can't prove that my truth is any more correct than anyone elses, but I still know it is. It's called faith. I accept one truth over another out of nothing but a feeling and a hunch. It's called faith. I blindly throw my beliefs out on the table without anything to back them up with. It's called faith.
You don't have to choose one over the other; it's just the same as choosing not to believe anything at all.
The fact is, the majority of Americans don't smoke pot, and never will. I refuse to legalize it for a fractional minority, and then make the majority of responsible Americans pay for it through the health care system.
A heroine addict would steal your VCR that you worked for to pay for their next high, wouldn't they? I have lots of friends that smoke pot, and they have to steal from their mothers' purses to pay for it too. It's pitiful.
Because computers get outdated with every passing day, and your new computer games run slower and slower. Game platforms don't get surpassed for at least 18 months, and it remains very current for about 36 months.
A new computer costs $1000... a PS2 costs $150.
The Sims expansion packs cost $39... a PS2 game costs $35.
My underlying point was, if you're bored, there are a million ways to stay entertained. Pick one besides using tobacco, please Pagan.
If I've said it once, I've said it 10000 times
With my luck, on a space elevator, I'd get wedged between the fat Albanian woman and the guy with the coffee reading his New York Times. And once we got there, we could all look forward to a nice, dusty glass of unfrozen polar ice water!
And with all of this emphasis on bettering humanity, we could invest billions to build low-gravity martini glasses! Ah, the magic of science!
Let's not put the cart in front of the horse... have you seen the "latest" crawler on a scale of that size at MIT(?)? It had six legs, and it takes about 90 seconds to move one leg out in front of the others and stabilize it. I would much rather use a rover for the non-rocky areas of Mars
I forgot you're a New York socialite... so much more connected than this "jug-headed redneck" Colorado farmboy!
:0
i just smoke to becse im boared
Get a job and buy a PS2...
If marijuana users locked themselves in a room, and smoked one joint every once in a while, and got high-and-happy away from society, I wouldn't see any problem in legalizing it.
However, people smoke marijuana, and the high fades after a while, and you need better stuff to keep your high. You move to a worse and worse addiction, and you need to steal from innocent people to feed your addiction. Your desperate search for a high ruins your life.
I think we should legalize marijuana, tax it 50%, and issue a license to users of any age. By taking that license, they agree to forfeit all US government health benefits, and have to pay a yearly fee to the government to renew your license.
It gets rid of the black market by putting industry in charge of production, and it gets rid of government risk by eliminating the consequences of assumed health risks down the road.
In this new day and age of terrorism, we have to relinquish some of our rights to ensure our protection. Do I care if the FBI, or the CIA, or INS or Department of Homeland Security have a file on me? No. Why? Because I know that I'm not plotting or conspiring with terrorists, and I have nothing to fear.
Think for yourself.
Define your values.
I do think for myself. But the conservative point of view matches my personal beliefs in 99.9% of the time. Really the only thing I disagree with my party on is farm subsidies, where I take a slightly-left viewpoint.
Are you going to avoid my request that you substantiate your silly claim that people from middle eastern dissent are the only ones, of all the people in the country, who can't get their visas ?renewed on time??
Did I say Arabs are the only ones who can't renew their visas? Nope. Most Arabs can fill out a form and have it processed ahead of time, like a lot of other immigrants. I've been saying all along that we don't treat Arabs any differently, and when we get illegal Mexicans, Cubans, Chinesee etc., we do the same thing and deport them.
You guys are still really paranoid of this country becoming a KGB-Twilight-Zone nightmare. Yes, our freedoms may change a bit to protect us, but it won't come near a Stalinist Russia. People will still be able to speak out against the government, and hold peace rallies in public, and believe in their own religion without interference from the government. BUT WHAT THE HELL BIT OF GOOD DOES OUR CONSTITUTION DO IF WE CAN'T DEFEND IT?!
It's not that people in the current administration are evilly plotting the demise of western civilization. It's just the nature of power. Power wishes for more power. Power tries to centralize. Power is it's own means and ends.
That's why the authors of our constitution left so many back-doors and checks and balances... to keep this from happening.
You're being too intent on my examples, soph. My underlying point was that China's bulk of spending is in the form of soldiers and ground operations, whereas the US spends more on maintaining and building weapons of a higher technological nature. My point is, the US needs to spend a good deal of money to keep our tech-toys combat ready. And that $300 is your guess. I'm sure many different people would give us many different answers.
AltToWar, I'm not going to let you drag me through the mud like you have before. I don't call your party names, and I don't know why you have all this unbridled hate for someone you've never even met, let alone a teenager that was trying to have a civilized debate with people he thought were at a higher level. Thank you for crushing my hopes you bastard.
I'm still waiting for some hardcore liberal to respond to why liberalism pisses me off. And you still have these paranoid fantasies about the government having a black list, like this is Stalinist Russia. Get a life. Do you honestly think that the government and our leaders are in office dreaming about persecuting non-americans? It's alright to question the status quo, but damn dude, you really ARE scared of the black helicopters coming to get you (don't worry, son, they don't exist. Only those jug-headed rednecks that throw bricks through Arab's windows believe in them!)
I used to have no faith my generation's ability to lead when the time comes, but that fear has been erased by your commments, alt. What a miserable existence it must be to live in constant fear of your elected leaders...
And the US doesn't have 10% of the armed forces, they have ten percent of the full-time soldiers. We have to spend more money on maintaining our complex weaponry. China doesn't spend as much because they are primarily ground war people. The US, however, has to spend a pretty penny to keep planes that can take off in Missouri and be on the other side of the world in 12 hours. China doesn't have those toys, and they're on Santa's naughty list this year ![]()
caltech, its easy for countries with less people to spend more per capita. especially when the government has full control of funding.
the converse is true as well. China only spends $11-$50 per person because they have 1.2 billion people. And being totalitarian, as you have claimed, they should also have full control of funding.
Soph, the electoral college is in place to ensure that politicians care about the votes of small states. Wyoming, for instance, has 3 electoral votes for a population of about 475,000. Under a popular vote system, a good sized TOWN in California, Texas, or Florida would have more popular votes than that. Without the electoral college, there would be no reason for presidential candidates to campaign in smaller states, and they would focus on population centers. We would be effectively augmenting the less populated regions of the country from the denser sections.
And my question still stands, Alt. Why do thousands of immigrants of all races and origins, come to this country legally every year, and don't get into ANY trouble with the INS? Why can everyone else make sure their visas are renewed on time, yet somehow when it comes to Arab-almost-Americans, the government creates an evil conspiracy to have the beurocracy hold up their applications.
Tom Tancredo is still my favorite congressman... ![]()
And what about "jug-headed rednecks" Josh?
Sorry, Josh. I couldn't see all the way back to when that post was made. AltToWar made the comment. Sorry everybody...???