You are not logged in.
Just a quick thought: has anyone ever considered retiring the shuttle orbiters in space. That is, non-return space missions to the ISS instead of decomissioning them. I'm sure they'll make useful additions to the space station, especially if fitted out with pressurized cargo bays, although they might not be worth the safety concerns. Still, could be a fitting tribute to the orbiters.
- Mike, Member of the [b][url=http://cleanslate.editboard.com]Clean Slate Society[/url][/b]
Offline
Like button can go here
It has been considered on this forum before. The problem is that they rely on fuel cells to operate and this means refueling on the ground. There is also the problem that the shuttle is heavy and increases the mass that the routine supply rockets have to push into higher orbits.
The shuttles wings also increase drag from the small amount of atmosphere present and this increases the rate that the spacestation will deorbit.
The small amount of fuel left in the shuttles tanks are highly corrosive and this cannot be stored for long periods.
And finally just what can we use the shuttle for. It is a transport vehicle and does not really increase the capability of the ISS while it will increase the cost of operation.
Chan eil mi aig a bheil ùidh ann an gleidheadh an status quo; Tha mi airson cur às e.
Offline
Like button can go here
Yeah, your right. Also, it won't be good when it re-enters uncontrolled after its been neglected in orbit. Case closed.
- Mike, Member of the [b][url=http://cleanslate.editboard.com]Clean Slate Society[/url][/b]
Offline
Like button can go here